1. Introduction
Throughout this paper, let
V and
W be real vector spaces. The study of the stability of functional equations began with Hyers’ study of the additive functional equation
for all
(see [
6,
15]). Subsequently, Rassias [
14] and Găvruţa [
5] generalized Hyers’ result on the stability of the additive functional equation, and many mathematicians have since applied the methods of Rassias and Găvruţa to the study of the stability of various functional equations.
Some mathematicians have studied the stability of the additive-quadratic functional equation
for all
(see [
2,
4,
7,
10,
12,
13,
16]).
For a given mapping
, we use the following abbreviation:
for all
. We consider the functional equation
for all
. The functional equation (
1) is called
an additive-quadratic-cubic functional equation and its solution is called
an additive-quadratic-cubic mapping. For example, the function
given by
is a particular solution of the functional equation (
1), where
are real constants and
is the set of real numbers.
In this paper, we will prove the stability theorem of the additive quadratic-cubic functional equation (
1) in the sense of Găvruţa. Furthermore, as corollaries of this theorem, we will show stability theorems of functional equation (
1) in the sense of Hyers and Rassias.
2. Stability of a General Undecic Functional Equation
Throughout this section, we use the following definitions:
For a given mapping
, we use the following abbreviations:
for all
.
Note that
for all
, where
are positive integers..
The following theorem introduced by Albert and Baker [
1] can be obtained by Corollary 1, Theorem 3 and Corollary 3 in Djoković’s paper [
3].
Theorem 1. ([
1, Theorem C])
For a given mapping , the followings are equivalent:
A mapping satisfies the functional equation for all ;
There exist mappings that satisfy and
for all and each .
When
, if a mapping
satisfies the functional equation (
2), then
f is called an additive mapping, a quadratic mapping, and a cubic mapping, respectively.
Theorem 2. For a given mapping , the followings are equivalent:
for all .
for all with .
Proof. (i) ⇒ (ii) Assume that
satisfies
for all
. Since
, we get
and
for all
. If we put
, then it follows (
3) that
for all
. From (
3) and (
4), we obtain the desired result
for all
with
.
(ii) ⇒ (i) If satisfies for all with , then for all . □
According to Theorem 1 and Theorem 2, we know that a mapping satisfies the functional equation for all if and only if there exist an additive mapping A, a quadratic mapping Q, and a cubic mapping C such that for all .
A very useful equality for proving the main theorem is given in the following lemma.
Lemma 1.
For any mapping , the equality
holds for all .
Proof. We obtain the equality (
5) from the equalities
for all
. □
From the definitions of , , , and , we obtain the following lemma.
Lemma 2.
For any mapping , the equalities
hold for all and each .
Proof. The calculation process is omitted because the equalities (
6)–(12) can be shown simply by calculation. □
Lemma 3.
If a mapping satisfies the functional equation for all , then the mappings satisfies
for all and each .
Proof. If a mapping
satisfies the functional equation
for all
, then
f satisfies the functional equation
by (
5). Therefore, the equality (
13) follows from the equality (
6)–(8). □
From now on, let X be a real normed space and Y be a real Banach space.
According to Corollary 6 in [
9], we obtain following lemma.
Lemma 4.
For a given mapping , assume that there exist a mapping and a function that satisfy either
for all . And also if there exist mappings such that and for all and , then the mapping F is uniquely determined.
As a corollary of Lemma 3 and Lemma 4, we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 3. For a given mapping , if there exists an additive-quadratic-cubic-mapping and a function that satisfy either or or or for all , then the mapping F is uniquely determined.
The following inequalities and identities are needed to prove the main theorem.
Lemma 5.
The following inequalities hold:
for all . Moreover, the following identity holds:
when .
Proof. The verification of the above identity and inequalities requires only tedious calculations, so the proofs are omitted. □
Now, as the main theorem, we will show generalized stability of the additive-quadratic-cubic functional equation in the sense of Găvruţa.
Theorem 4.
Assume that a function satisfies either
for all . If a mapping satisfies the inequality
for all , then there exists a unique additive-quadratic-cubic mapping such that
for all , where is the function defined by
Proof. From (
5), (
27), and the definition of
, we obtain that
for all
.
(1) If
satisfies the inequality (
23) and
, then
for all
. It follows from (
6) and (
29) that
for all
. In the same way, we get the inequalities
for all
from (7) and (8). Together with the equality
for all
and all
, we obtain the inequalities
for all
and
. It follows from (
30), (
31), (32), and (33) that the sequence
is a Cauchy sequence for all
when
. Since
Y is complete, the sequence
converges for all
when
. Hence we can define a mapping
by
for all
when
. Since
for all
, we obtain the equation
for all
. In the same way, we can obtain the equation
for all
when
. If we put
for all
, then
satisfies
for all
, i.e,
F is an additive-quadratic-cubic mapping. From (
6), (7), (8), (12), (
18), and (
29), we get
for all
. According to Theorem 3,
F is a unique additive-quadratic-cubic mapping satisfying the inequality (
28) for all
.
(2) If
satisfies the inequality (24) for all
and
, then
for all
. By using the inequality (
34), we can obtain the inequalities (32) and (33) for all
and
. Hence we can define a mapping
by
for all
when
. Also we can obtain equation
for all
.
On the other hand, if
satisfies the inequality (24) for all
and
, then
for all
. It follows from (
13) and (
29) that
for all
. Together with the equality
for all
, we obtain the inequality
for all
and
. From (
35) and (
36), we can define a mapping
by
for all
. We observe that
by (24), i.e,
for all
. If we put
for all
, then
F is an additive-quadratic-cubic mapping.
From (7), (8), (
13), (12), (19), and (
29), we get
for all
. According to Theorem 3,
F is a unique additive-quadratic-cubic mapping satisfying the inequality (
28) for all
.
(3) If
satisfies the inequality (25) for all
and
, then
for all
. By using the inequality (
37), we can obtain the inequality (33) for all
and
. Hence we can define a mapping
by
for all
. Also we can obtain the equation
for all
.
On the other hand, if
satisfies the inequality (25) for all
and
, then
for all
. By using the inequality (
13), (10), and (
38), we can obtain the inequalities (
36) and
for all
and
.
From (
36), (
38), and (
39), we can define a mapping
by
for all
when
. We observe that
by (24), i.e,
for all
. In the same way, we can obtain the equation
for all
. If we put
for all
, then
F is an additive-quadratic-cubic mapping.
From (8), (
13), (10), (12), (21), and (
29), we get
for all
. According to Theorem 3,
F is a unique additive-quadratic-cubic mapping satisfying the inequality (
28) for all
.
(4) If
satisfies the inequality (26) for all
and
, then
for all
. By using the inequality (
13), (10), (11), and (
40), we can obtain the inequalities (
36), (
39), and
for all
and
.
From (
36), (
39), (
40), and (
41), we can define a mapping
by
for all
when
. We observe that
for all
, i.e,
for all
. In the same way, we can obtain the equation
for all
when
. If we put
for all
, then
F is an additive-quadratic-cubic mapping.
From (8), (
13), (10), (12), (20), (
22), and (
29), we get
for all
. According to Theorem 3,
F is a unique additive-quadratic-cubic mapping satisfying the inequality (
28) for all
. □
From Theorem 4, we obtain the generalized stability of the functional equation for all in the sense of Găvruţa.
Corollary 1.
Assume that a function satisfies either
for all . If a mapping satisfies the inequality
for all , then there exists a unique additive-quadratic-cubic mapping such that
for all , where is the mapping given by for all and is the function defined by
Proof. Let
be the function given by
for all
and let
be the mapping given by
for all
, where
. Since
for all
with
, we know that
for all
. From inequalities (
42), (43), (44), (45), and (
46),
and
satisfy inequalities (
23), (24), (25), (26), and (
27) in Theorem 4, so there exists a unique additive-quadratic-cubic mapping
that satisfies the inequality (
47). □
From Theorem 4, we obtain the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of the additive-quadratic-cubic functional equation (
1) in the sense of Rassias.
Theorem 5.
Let θ and p be positive real constants such that . If satisfies the inequality
for all , then there exists a unique additive-quadratic-cubic mapping F such that
for all .
Proof. If we substitute for in Theorem 4, then we get . From this, we can easily obtain this theorem as a corollary of Theorem 4. □
From Theorem 4, we obtain the stability of the additive-quadratic-cubic functional equation (
1) in the sense of Hyers.
Theorem 6.
Let δ be a positive real constant. If satisfies the inequality
for all , then there exists a unique additive-quadratic-cubic mapping F such that
for all .
Proof. If we substitute
for
in Theorem 4, then we get
. Applying the case in Theorem 4 where p satisfies (
23), we obtain this theorem. □
From Corollary 1, we obtain the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of the functional equation in the sense of Rassias.
Corollary 2.
Let θ and p be positive real numbers such that . If satisfies the inequality
for all , then there exists a unique additive-quadratic-cubic mapping F such that
for all .
From Corollary 1, we obtain the stability of the functional equation in the sense of Hyers.
Corollary 3.
Let δ be a positive real constant. If a mapping satisfies the inequality
for all , then there exists a unique additive-quadratic-cubic mapping F such that
for all .