Goldbach’s strong conjecture, asserting that every even integer greater than two can be expressed as the sum of two prime numbers, remains one of the oldest unresolved problems in mathematics. Despite overwhelming numerical verification and powerful partial results, a complete analytic proof has remained elusive. At the same time, extensive computations have revealed a striking empirical phenomenon known as Goldbach’s comet: the rapidly growing number of Goldbach representations as a function of the even integer E, forming a characteristic comet-like structure when plotted.This review article provides a comprehensive synthesis of classical analytic number theory, modern distributional results on primes, and recent structural insights in order to explain the existence, shape, and persistence of Goldbach’s comet. We introduce and develop a unified framework based on three complementary quantities: the dominance ratio Ω(E), measuring the growth of available prime density relative to local obstructions; the density field λ, encoding the smooth asymptotic behavior of primes; and the obstruction constant Κ, bounding the maximal effect of local gaps and covariance.We show that Ω(E) diverges, reflecting a fundamental scale separation between global prime density and local irregularities, and that λ-weighted obstructions remain bounded while density grows without bound. This framework explains why no gap-based or covariance-based mechanism can suppress Goldbach representations and why the number of representations necessarily increases. We argue that Goldbach’s conjecture is thereby reduced to a single, well-identified uniform realization problem within existing analytic methods.Rather than claiming a final proof, this article aims to clarify the conceptual structure underlying Goldbach’s conjecture, explain Goldbach’s comet as a necessary consequence of prime density dominance, and position the conjecture within a sharply defined analytic frontier. The result is a coherent, literature-grounded explanation of why Goldbach’s conjecture must be true and what precise technical step remains to complete its proof.