Submitted:
06 December 2025
Posted:
08 December 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Setting
2.2. Data Collection and Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Patient Characteristics and Pretreatment Assessment
3.3. Overall Treatment Tolerance
| Reason for non-administration of treatment | 100% (N=32) |
|---|---|
| Immunotherapy-related toxicity occurring during the neoadjuvant phase (irrespective of severity) | 50% |
| Isolated troponin elevation on the pre-treatment workup for adjuvant therapy, with normal findings on cardiological investigations | 18,8% |
| Disease progression | 6,2% |
| Pathological complete response and decision not to pursue with the adjuvant sequence | 9,4% |
| Patient’s preference | 12,5% |
| Anthracycline-related cardiac toxicity, with a preference to avoid adding immunotherapy in this context | 3,1% |
3.4. Liver Toxicity
3.5. Cutaneous Toxicity
3.6. Endocrine Toxicity
3.7. Colitis
3.8. Cardiac Toxicity
3.9. Pathological Response
4. Discussion and Conclusions
- Grades 3–4 toxicities occurred in 20% of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab for localized TNBC in our real-world practice.
- Patients with grades 3–4 irAEs tended to have higher pCR rates (80% vs. 56.8%; p = 0.079).
- The number of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab cycles did not influence the pCR rate.
- 16.3% of the cohort exhibited elevated troponin levels, 2% had documented immune-related myocarditis.
- Postoperative troponin elevation could be related to MINS; however, immune-related myocarditis should be ruled out first.
- Baseline ANA status does not appear to have predictive or prognostic value for severe toxicity occurrence.
Ethical approval
Patients consent
Availability of data and material
Competing interests
Authors’ Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
References
- Panorama des cancers en France – Édition 2024 [Internet]. 2025. Available online: https://www.cancer.fr/catalogue-des-publications/panorama-des-cancers-en-france-edition-2024.
- Ter Brugge, P; Moser, SC; Bièche, I; Kristel, P; Ibadioune, S; Eeckhoutte, A; et al. Homologous recombination deficiency derived from whole-genome sequencing predicts platinum response in triple-negative breast cancers. Nat Commun. 2023, 14(1), 1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Serrano García, L; Jávega, B; Llombart Cussac, A; Gión, M; Pérez-García, JM; Cortés, J; et al. Patterns of immune evasion in triple-negative breast cancer and new potential therapeutic targets: a review. Front Immunol 2024, 15, 1513421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gennari, A; André, F; Barrios, CH; Cortés, J; Azambuja, E; de; DeMichele, A; et al. ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer☆. Ann Oncol. 2021, 32(12), 1475-95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pembrolizumab in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2025, 392(11), 1140-3.
- Haute Autorité de Santé [Internet. KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) - Cancer du sein. 2025. Available online: https://www.has-sante.fr/jcms/p_3325988/fr/keytruda-pembrolizumab-cancer-du-sein.
- PORTAIL AP KEYTRUDA — MSD [Internet]. 2025. Available online: https://www.apkeytruda.fr/portail/.
- Pembrolizumab in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2025, 392(11), 1140-3.
- Freites-Martinez, A; Santana, N; Arias-Santiago, S; Viera, A. Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE - Version 5.0) to Evaluate the Severity of Adverse Events of Anticancer Therapies. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2021, 112(1), 90-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luetkens, JA; Faron, A; Isaak, A; Dabir, D; Kuetting, D; Feisst, A; et al. Comparison of Original and 2018 Lake Louise Criteria for Diagnosis of Acute Myocarditis: Results of a Validation Cohort. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2019, 1(3), e190010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- KEYNOTE-522 - Adverse Reactions & Safety Data [Internet]. 2025. Available online: https://www.keytrudahcp.com/safety/adverse-reactions/early-stage-triple-negative-breast-cancer/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
- Rached, L; Peyre-Pradat, F; Spotti, M; Baldini, C; Laparra, A; Lambotte, O; et al. Real-world safety and effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combination with pembrolizumab in triple-negative breast cancer. ESMO Real World Data Digit Oncol 2024, 5, 100061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kulkarni, A; Marcucci, M; Nguyen, JMV. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery. CMAJ 2024, 196(19), E661-E661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- American College of Cardiology [Internet. Combination Chemotherapy/Immunotherapy Regimens in Patients With Breast Cancer. 2025. Available online: https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Articles/2024/07/02/10/33/http%3a%2f%2fwww.acc.org%2fLatest-in-Cardiology%2fArticles%2f2024%2f07%2f02%2f10%2f33%2fCombination-Chemotherapy-Immunotherapy-Regimens-in-Patients-With-Breast-Cancer%3futm_source%3dchatgpt.com.
- Zhou, F; Liu, G; Zhang, S; Luo, C; Hu, S; Wan, S; et al. Cardiotoxicity in cancer immunotherapy: a systematic review and global meta-analysis. J Transl Med. 2025, 23, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmid, P; Cortes, J; Pusztai, L; McArthur, H; Kümmel, S; Bergh, J; et al. Pembrolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020, 382(9), 810-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hountondji, L; Ferreira De Matos, C; Lebossé, F; Quantin, X; Lesage, C; Palassin, P; et al. Clinical pattern of checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury in a multicentre cohort. JHEP Rep. 2023, 5(6), 100719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghosh, N; Chan, KK; Jivanelli, B; Bass, AR. Autoantibodies in Patients With Immune-Related Adverse Events From Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Literature Review. J Clin Rheumatol Pract Rep Rheum Musculoskelet Dis. 2022, 28(2), e498-505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hountondji, L; Faure, S; Palassin, P; Viel, PWD; Dupuy, M; Larrey, D; et al. Time to use the right classification to predict the severity of checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury, as assessed for causality using the updated RUCAM. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2024, 60(11-12), 1561-72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmid, P; Cortes, J; Dent, R; McArthur, H; Pusztai, L; Kümmel, S; et al. Overall Survival with Pembrolizumab in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024, 391(21), 1981-91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Belum, VR; Benhuri, B; Postow, MA; Hellmann, MD; Lesokhin, AM; Segal, NH; et al. Characterisation and management of dermatologic adverse events to agents targeting the PD-1 receptor. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 1990 2016, 60, 12-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kennedy, OJ; Ali, N; Lee, R; Monaghan, P; Adam, S; Cooksley, T; et al. Thyroid dysfunction after immune checkpoint inhibitors in a single-centre UK pan-cancer cohort: A retrospective study. Eur J Cancer [Internet]. 2024, 202. Available online: https://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049%2824%2900125-4/fulltext?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
- Osorio, JC; Ni, A; Chaft, JE; Pollina, R; Kasler, MK; Stephens, D; et al. Antibody-mediated thyroid dysfunction during T-cell checkpoint blockade in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017, 28(3), 583-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Neven, P; Floris, G; Desmedt, C. Pembrolizumab in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2025, 392(11), 1140-1. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Cardoso, F; O’Shaughnessy, J; Liu, Z; McArthur, H; Schmid, P; Cortes, J; et al. Pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in high-risk, early-stage, ER+/HER2− breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial. Nat Med. 2025, 31(2), 442-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Parameter | n (%) / Values |
| Age (years) | |
| Mean [range] | 50 [27–76] |
| Median [range] | 50 [27–76] |
| Performance status (PS) | |
| PS0 | 96.7 |
| PS1 | 3.3 |
| Menopausal status | |
| Menopausal | 47.8 |
| Premenopausal | 46.8 |
| Perimenopausal | 5.4 |
| History of hormonal intake | |
| Yes | 13.0 |
| No | 29.0 |
| Unknown |
58.0 |
| Active smoking | |
| Yes | 34.4 |
| No | 44.1 |
| Unknown |
21.5 |
| Alcohol intake | |
| Yes | 9.7 |
| No | 44.1 |
| Unknown |
46.2 |
| BMI | |
| Mean [range] | 25.2 [17–41.79] |
| Median |
24.17 |
| Comorbidities* | |
| Yes | 18.3 |
| No |
77.4 |
| History of autoimmune disease | |
| Yes | 3.3 |
| No |
96.7 |
| Personal history of breast cancer | |
| Yes | 7.6 |
| No |
92.4 |
| Pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations | |
| BRCA1 | 9.8 |
| BRCA2 | 1.1 |
| Parameter | n (%) |
| LDH | |
| Elevated | 7.7 |
| Normal | 54.3 |
| Unknown | 38 |
| Albumin | |
| Normal | 65 |
| Unknown | 35 |
| Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) | |
| Positive | 17.4 |
| Negative | 39.1 |
| Unknown | 43.5 |
| Rheumatoid factor | |
| Positive | 3.3 |
| Negative | 47.8 |
| Unknown | 48.9 |
| Anti-CCP Ab | |
| Positive | 0.0 |
| Negative | 45.7 |
| Unknown | 54.3 |
| Anti-TPO Ab | |
| Positive | 5.4 |
| Negative | 45.7 |
| Unknown | 48.9 |
| PC-pembrolizumab (N=92) | EC-pembrolizumab (N=91) | Adjuvant pembrolizumab (N=60)a | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toxicity | Grades 1-2 | Grades 3-4 | Grades 1-2 | Grades 3-4 | Grades 1-2 | Grades 3-4 |
| Allergic reaction | 18,5% | 0 | 4,3% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Skin toxicity* | 23,9% | 1,1% | 9,8% | 0 | 5% | 1,7% |
| Diarrhea | 38% | 2,2% | 8,7% | 1,1% | 3,3% | 0% |
| Nausea | 58,7 | 2,2% | 52,2% | 1,1% | 0% | 0% |
| Vomiting | 16,3% | 1,1% | 17,4% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Peripheral neuropathy |
41,3% | 1,1% | 0% | 0% | 0% ** |
0% |
| Arthralgias | 9,8% | 0% | 5,4% | 0% | 6% | 1,6% |
| Myalgias | 18,5% | 0% | 1,1% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Mucitis | 13% | 0% | 15,2% | 1,1% | 0% | 0% |
| Constipation (de novo) | 20,7% | 0% | 7,6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Thrombopenia | 12% | 1,1% | 4,3% | 1,1% | 0% | 0% |
| Anemia | 58,7% | 4,3% | 53,3% | 6,5% | 0% | 0% |
| Neutropenia | 20,7% | 43,5% | 12% | 18,5% | 0% | 0% |
| Febrile neutropenia | 2,2% | 17,4% | 0% | 0% | ||
| Fever | 16,3% | 12% | 19,6 | 1,1% | 0% | 0% |
| Infections | 22,8% | 0% | 14,1% | 0% | 5% | 0% |
| Elevated ALT levels | 16,5% | 5% | 4% | 3% | 15% | 0% |
| Elevated Troponin levels | 1% | 0% | 6,5% | 0% | *** | 1,6% |
| Dysthyroïdism (de novo) | 12% | 0% | 7,6% | 1% | 8,3% | 0% |
| Adrenal insufficiency | 3,2% | 0% | 2,1% | 1% | 3,3 | 0% |
| Renal toxicity | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| AIHA | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Sicca syndrome | 1% | 0% | 2,1% | 0 | 1% | 0% |
| Carpal tunnel syndrome | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% |
| N=33(=100%) | Grade 1 (58%, N=19) | Grade 2 (18% ,N=6) |
Grade 3 (18% , N=6) |
Grade 4 (6%, N=2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to onset * | 15,8 [1-57] | 5,5 [1-9] | 6 [1-18] | 20,5 [1-40] |
| Presentation | ||||
| Cholestatic | 42,4% | 0% | 3% | 0% |
| Cytolytic | 3% | 0% | 12% | 0% |
| Mixed | 12% | 18% | 3% | 6% |
| Immune antibodies | ||||
| Negative | 15% | 12% | 15% | 6% |
| Positive | ANA* 9% |
0% | ANA* 3% | 0% |
| Not tested | 34% | 6% | 0% | 0% |
| Infectious serology tests |
||||
| Positive | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Negative | 27% | 18% | 18% | 6.1% |
| Not tested | 31% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Biopsy | No | No | 3% |
6,1% |
| Corticosteroids | 0% | Yes 3% No 15% |
Yes 3% No 15% |
Yes 6,1% |
| Delursan | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6,1% |
| Clinico-biological course. | Favorable outcome | Favorable outcome | Favorable outcome | Favorable outcome |
| Variable | Value |
|---|---|
| Time to onset (weeks) | |
| Median | 2.5 [1–88] |
| Mean | 11.8 |
| Type of skin lesion | |
| Isolated pruritus | 26.7% (8%*) |
| Maculopapular exanthem (rash) | 23.3% (7.7%*) |
| Isolated skin xerosis | 6.7% (2%*) |
| Urticaria | 16.7% (5.4%*) |
| Eczema | 3.3% (1%*) |
| Acneiform eruption | 3.3% (1%*) |
| Psoriasis | 3.3% (1%*) |
| Disabling lichen | 10% (3.2%*) |
| Eczema + Acneiform eruption | 3.3% (1%*) |
| Suspicion of DRESS syndrome | 3.3% (1%*) |
| Clinical Grade (CTCAE v5.0) | |
| Grades 1–2 | 93.3% (30.4%*) |
| Grades 3–4 | 6.7% (2.2%*) |
| Thyroid dysfunction (N = 25; 100%) |
Adrenal insufficiency (N = 8; 100%) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Time to onset (weeks) | ||
| Mean | 17 [4–44] | 17.6 [8–33] |
| Median | 14 | 13 |
| Timing of onset | ||
| Neoadjuvant | 80% (21.7% of totalcohort) | 75% (6/8) |
| Adjuvant | 20% (5.4% of total cohort) | 25% (2/8) |
| Severity (CTCAE v5.0) | ||
| Grades 1–2 | 95.7% (26% of total cohort) |
87.5% (7/8) |
| Grades 3–4 | 4.3% (1 % of total cohort) | 12.5% (1/8) |
| Anti-TPO antibodies | ||
| Positive | 16% | |
| Negative | 32% | |
| Not tested | 52% | |
| Toxicity requiring hospitalization | 4% | 12.5% (1/8) |
| Anti-TPO Ab: Anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies; CTCAE v5.0: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
