Submitted:
04 December 2025
Posted:
05 December 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.1.1. Cement
2.1.2. Aggregates
3.1.3. Admixtures
2.2. Experimental Methodology
2.2.1. Concrete Mix Design
2.2.2. Sample Preparation
2.2.4. Fresh Concrete Properties
2.2.5. Conditioning of Samples
2.3. Concrete Core Testing of Delaware Bridges
2.3.1. Mechanical Testing Procedures
- a)
- Resonance Frequency Testing
- b) Compression Testing
- c) Modulus of Elasticity Testing
2.3.2. Resistivity Testing Procedure
3. Results
3.1. Physical Results
3.1.1. Resonance Frequency
3.2.2. Compressive strength
3.2.3. Modulus of Elasticity
3.2.4. Poisson’s Ratio
3.2.5. Compressive and Resonance Frequency Comparison
3.3. Chemical Results
4. Case study: Delaware Bridges
4.1. Selected Bridge Locations
4.2. Bridge Deck Cores
4.2.1. Core Sample Testing and Analysis
4.2.2. Compressive Testing of Bridge Cores and Lab Specimens
4.2.3. Chloride Measurements of Bridge Decks
5. Analysis and Discussion
5.1. Environmental Condition Trends
5.1.3. Wet-Dry Cycles Predictions
5.2. Experimental Trends
5.3. Predictive Model
5.4. Durability Envelope
5.5. Durability Index
6. Conclusions
- Laboratory testing demonstrated that concrete specimens exposed to alternating environmental stressors, wet-dry and freeze-thaw cycles combined with varying chloride concentrations, underwent progressive degradation over time.
- Among all measured properties, resonance frequency was the most sensitive and reliable indicator of internal damage. Resonance frequency measured in Hertz (Hz) consistently declined across all exposure conditions, signaling microstructural deterioration that preceded measurable strength loss. This makes resonance frequency a valuable early predictor of material degradation
- Chloride concentration increased with exposure time, even when no surface deterioration was visible. This shows that significant internal damage can develop long before visual symptoms appear, so subsurface monitoring is necessary.
- Core samples taken from bridges along Interstate 495 in Wilmington, DE showed good correlation with the laboratory findings. The cores covered a wide range of compressive strength and chloride content. Although these bridges were rated in “Good” condition according to National Bridge Inventory (NBI) standards, many samples already exhibited chloride accumulation and reduced strength, revealing the limitations of relying solely on surface-based inspection techniques.
- The disconnect between visual condition ratings and measured material performance shows that traditional inspections can overlook critical internal damage. This supports the need to incorporate material-based and nondestructive testing methods into routine bridge assessments, including subsurface monitoring techniques such as ground penetrating radar (GPR).
- A deterioration envelope framework was established, integrating laboratory results, field core data, and environmental exposure variables, including NOAA climate data and FHWA InfoBridge™ parameters (snow day frequency, freeze-thaw frequency, and time of wetness of bridge structures).
- The resulting models demonstrated a new multifaced technique in estimating structural aging trends and service life under various environmental conditions. These tools support more proactive and data-driven maintenance strategies, enhancing long-term planning and management of concrete infrastructure.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| DelDOT | Delaware Department of Transportation |
| NBI | National Bridge Inventory |
| GPR | Ground penetrating radar |
| ACI | American Concrete Institute |
| ASTM | American Society for Testing and Materials |
| CC | Chloride Content |
| FHWA | Federal Highway Administration's |
| NOAA | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration |
References
- Ibrahim, A.; Abdelkhalek, S.; Zayed, T.; Qureshi, A.H.; Abdelkader, E.M. A Comprehensive Review of the Key Deterioration Factors of Concrete Bridge Decks. Buildings 2024, 14, 3425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehman, M. The American Society of Civil Engineers’ Report Card on America’s Infrastructure. In Women in infrastructure; Springer, 2022; pp. 5–21. [Google Scholar]
- ASCE 2021 Infrastructure Report Card; The 2021 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure; 2021; pp. 1–171.
- Landers, J. ASCE’s 2021 Report Card Marks the Nations’s Infrastructure Progress. 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Weyers, R.E.; Prowell, B.D.; Sprinkel, M.M.; Vorster, M. Concrete Bridge Protection, Repair, and Rehabilitation Relative to Reinforcement Corrosion: A Methods Application Manual. Contract 1993, 100, 103. [Google Scholar]
- Kuosa, H.; Ferreira, R.; Holt, E.; Leivo, M.; Vesikari, E. Effect of coupled deterioration by freeze–thaw, carbonation and chlorides on concrete service life. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2014, 47, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roh, G.; Shim, C.; Song, H. Inspection Data-Driven Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Remaining Service Life of Deteriorating Bridge Decks. Buildings 2025, 15, 2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gode, K.; Paeglitis, A. Concrete bridge deterioration caused by de-icing salts in high traffic volume road environment in Latvia. Balt. J. Road Bridg. Eng. 2014, 9, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arezoumand, S.; Smadi, O. Equity in Transportation Asset Management: A Proposed Framework. Algorithms 2024, 17, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z. Transportation Asset Management: Methodology and Applications; CRC Press, 2018; ISBN 1-315-11796-7. [Google Scholar]
- Demich, G.F. Investigation of Bridge Deck Deterioration Caused by De-Icing Chemicals. In Bridge Condition Section, Washington State Department of Highways; 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Jia, Y. Strength Reduction of Bridge Decks with Loss of Reinforcement Cross-Sectional Area. Masters Thesis, Purdue University, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Hájková, K.; Šmilauer, V.; Jendele, L.; Červenka, J. Prediction of reinforcement corrosion due to chloride ingress and its effects on serviceability. Eng. Struct. 2018, 174, 768–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qasim, O.A.; Maula, B.H.; Moula, H.H.; Jassam, S.H. Effect of Salinity on Concrete Properties; IOP Publishing, 2020; Vol. 745, p. 012171. [Google Scholar]
- Penttala, V. Surface and internal deterioration of concrete due to saline and non-saline freeze–thaw loads. Cem. Concr. Res. 2006, 36, 921–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McConnell, J.; Wunder, L.; Tatar, J.; Head, M. National Cooperative Highway Research Program; Transportation Research Board State DOT Policies and Practices on the Use of Corrosion-Resistant Reinforcing Bars; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, United States; ISBN, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Ahlström, J. Corrosion of Steel in Concrete at Various Moisture and Chloride Levels. 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Abu-Tair, A.; McParland, C.; Lyness, J.; Nadjai, A. Predictive Models of Deterioration Rates of Concrete Bridges Using the Factor Method Based on Historic Inspection Data. 2002. [Google Scholar]
- National Academies of Sciences; E. Medicine State DOT Policies and Practices on the Use of Corrosion-Resistant Reinforcing Bars. 2025. [Google Scholar]
- ASTM, C. 70: Standard Test Method For Surface Moisture in Fine Aggregates; ASTM international: West Conshohocken, PA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Standard, A. ASTM C33/C33M–18 Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates; West Conshohocken, PA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- ASTM C143 Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete; Annual Book of ASTM Standards. 2015.
- ASTM, C. Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method. Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly mixed Concrete by The Pressure Method; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- American Society for Testing and Materials. Committee C-9 on Concrete and Concrete Aggregates Standard Test Method for Resistance of Concrete to Rapid Freezing and Thawing; ASTM international, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- ASTM, C. Standard Test Method for Fundamental Transverse, Longitudinal, and Torsional Resonant Frequencies of Concrete Specimens. Annual book of ASTM standards 2008, 69, 50. [Google Scholar]
- ASTM, C. 215: 2019; Standard Test Method for Fundamental Transverse, Longitudinal, and Torsional Resonant Frequencies of Concrete Specimens; American Concrete Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- ASTM C39 Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. Available online: https://store.astm.org/c0039_c0039m-21.html (accessed on 9 September 2025).
- Washa, G.W.; Wendt, K.F. Fifty Year Properties of Concrete; 1975; Vol. 72, pp. 20–28. [Google Scholar]
- ASTM International Committee C09 on Concrete and Concrete Aggregates Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens; ASTM international, 2014.
- Yu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Liu, P.; Wang, W. Accelerated simulation of chloride ingress into concrete under drying–wetting alternation condition chloride environment. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 93, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartt, W.H.; Powers, R.G.; Presuel-Moreno, F.; Paredes, M.A.; Simmons, R.; Yu, H.; Himiob, R.; Virmani, Y.P. Corrosion Resistant Alloys for Reinforced Concrete. 2009. [Google Scholar]
































| Parameter | Value | Selection Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Cement Specific Gravity | 3.15 | Standard value |
| Coarse Aggregate Specific Gravity | 2.7 | From documentation |
| Fine Agg Specific Gravity | 2.65 | From lab testing of material |
| Coarse Agg Dry Unit Wt. (Unit) | 99.6 | From lab testing of material |
| Coarse Agg Moisture Content (%) | 1 | Found prior to batching |
| Fine Agg Moisture Content (%) | 1 | Found prior to batching |
| Slump [mm.] | 127 | Design Selection |
| Air Content (%) | 6 | Design Selection |
| Compressive Strength [MPa] | 25 | Design Selection |
| Slump/max Aggregate | 305 | |
| Compressive Strength w/c | 0.4 | |
| Max Agg/Fine Mod | 0.6 | |
| Coarse Agg Volume [CBM] | 0.46 | |
| Coarse Agg Weight [kg] | 732 | Based on Dry Rodded Unit Weight |
| Density of water [kg/m3] | 1000 | At room temperature |
| Water Weight [kg] | 99.7 | From w/c ratio |
| Volume of water [CBM] | 3.77 | Calculated based on density |
| Cement Weight [kg] | 249.5 | From w/c ratio |
| Volume of Cement [CBM] | 0.079 | Calculated based on density |
| Volume of Coarse Agg [CBM] | 0.27 | Calculated based on density |
| Air Volume [CBM] | 0.046 | Calculated based on air content requirement |
| Total Volume [CBM] | 0.52 | |
| Fine Agg Volume [CBM] | 0.24 | Calculated based on remaining volume in 1 cu. yd. |
| Fine Agg Weight [kg.] | 638.88 | Calculated based on density |
| Stockpile [CBM] | [kg/CBM] | [kg/CBM] |
| Fine Agg Batch Weight [kg] | 645.27 | 60.53 |
| Coarse Agg Batch Weight [kg] | 739.2 | 69.35 |
| Cement Batch Weight [kg] | 249.5 | 23.4 |
| Water Batch Weight [kg] | 101.7 | 9.54 |
| Total Batch Weight [kg] | 1735.65 | 162.82 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).