Submitted:
25 November 2025
Posted:
26 November 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Need for Specialized Cyber Attack Detection in IIoS
2. Literature Review
2.1. State of Arts Cyber Attacks and Available Datasets
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Dataset
| Types of Attacks | Training | Testing | Validation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Normal | 775152 | 166264 | 166032 |
| 2 | DoS | 54817 | 11608 | 11880 |
| 3 | Reconnaissance | 5825 | 1220 | 1195 |
| 4 | Command Injection | 190 | 40 | 34 |
| 5 | Backdoor | 140 | 38 | 29 |
| 6 | Total Attack Dataset | 60972 | 12906 | 13138 |
3.2. Machine Learning Process

3.3. Feature Extraction with Denoising Autoencoders
3.4. Training and Evaluation Process

4. Results and Discussion
5. Conclusion
References
- Yalli, J.S.; M.H. Hasan; A. Badawi. Internet of things (iot): Origin, embedded technologies, smart applications and its growth in the last decade. IEEE access 2024.
- Pohan, M.M.; B. Soewito. Injection attack detection on internet of things device with machine learning method. Jurasik (Jurnal Riset Sistem Informasi dan Teknik Informatika) 2023, 8(1), 204-12.
- Chui, M.; M. Collins; M. Patel. The Internet of Things: Catching up to an accelerating opportunity. 2021.
- van den Berg, D.; T. Slooff; M. Brohet; K. Papagiannopoulos; F. Regazzoni. Data Under Siege: The Quest for the Optimal Convolutional Autoencoder in Side-Channel Attacks. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN); IEEE, Year; 01-09.
- Ibor, A.E.; F.A. Oladeji; O.B. Okunoye; C.O. Uwadia. Novel adaptive cyberattack prediction model using an enhanced genetic algorithm and deep learning (AdacDeep). Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective 2022, 31(1), 105-24.
- Brown, A.; M. Gupta; M. Abdelsalam. Automated machine learning for deep learning based malware detection. Computers & Security 2024, 137, 103582.
- Qaddos, A.; M.U. Yaseen; A.S. Al-Shamayleh; M. Imran; A. Akhunzada; S.Z. Alharthi. A novel intrusion detection framework for optimizing IoT security. Scientific Reports 2024, 14(1), 21789.
- Maaz, M.; G. Ahmed; A.S. Al-Shamayleh; A. Akhunzada; S. Siddiqui; A.H. Al-Ghushami. Empowering IoT resilience: hybrid deep learning techniques for enhanced security. IEEE access 2024.
- Huma, Z.E.; S. Latif; J. Ahmad; Z. Idrees; A. Ibrar; Z. Zou; F. Alqahtani; F. Baothman. A hybrid deep random neural network for cyberattack detection in the industrial internet of things. IEEE access 2021, 9, 55595-605.
- Jullian, O.; B. Otero; E. Rodriguez; N. Gutierrez; H. Antona; R. Canal. Deep-learning based detection for cyber-attacks in iot networks: A distributed attack detection framework. Journal of Network and Systems Management 2023, 31(2), 33.
- Nandanwar, H.; R. Katarya. Deep learning enabled intrusion detection system for Industrial IOT environment. Expert Systems with Applications 2024, 249, 123808.
- Ahmadi Abkenari, F.; A. Milani Fard; S. Khanchi. Hybrid Machine Learning-Based Approaches for Feature and Overfitting Reduction to Model Intrusion Patterns. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy 2023, 3(3), 544-57.
- Qureshi, S.; J. He; S. Tunio; N. Zhu; F. Akhtar; F. Ullah; A. Nazir; A. Wajahat. A hybrid DL-based detection mechanism for cyber threats in secure networks. IEEE access 2021, 9, 73938-47.
- Al-Turaiki, I.; N. Altwaijry. A convolutional neural network for improved anomaly-based network intrusion detection. Big Data 2021, 9(3), 233-52.
- Halbouni, A.; T.S. Gunawan; M.H. Habaebi; M. Halbouni; M. Kartiwi; R. Ahmad. CNN-LSTM: hybrid deep neural network for network intrusion detection system. IEEE access 2022, 10, 99837-49.
- Bibi, A.; G.A. Sampedro; A. Almadhor; A.R. Javed; T.-h. Kim. A hypertuned lightweight and scalable LSTM model for hybrid network intrusion detection. Technologies 2023, 11(5), 121.
- Ferrag, M.A.; O. Friha; D. Hamouda; L. Maglaras; H. Janicke. Edge-IIoTset: A new comprehensive realistic cyber security dataset of IoT and IIoT applications for centralized and federated learning. IEEE access 2022, 10, 40281-306.
- Alanazi, M.; A. Mahmood; M.J.M. Chowdhury. ICS-LTU2022: A dataset for ICS vulnerabilities. Computers & Security 2025, 148, 104143.
- Lamshöft, K.; T. Neubert; C. Krätzer; C. Vielhauer; J. Dittmann. Information hiding in cyber physical systems: Challenges for embedding, retrieval and detection using sensor data of the SWAT dataset. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security; , Year; 113-24.
- Highnam, K.; K. Arulkumaran; Z. Hanif; N.R. Jennings. Beth dataset: Real cybersecurity data for unsupervised anomaly detection research. In Proceedings of the CEUR Workshop Proc; , Year; 1-12.
- Al-Hawawreh, M.; E. Sitnikova; N. Aboutorab. X-IIoTID: A connectivity-agnostic and device-agnostic intrusion data set for industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 2021, 9(5), 3962-77.
- Ismail, S.; S. Dandan; A.a. Qushou. Intrusion Detection in IoT and IIoT: Comparing Lightweight Machine Learning Techniques Using TON_IoT, WUSTL-IIOT-2021, and EdgeIIoTset Datasets. IEEE access 2025.
- Moustafa, N.; J. Slay. UNSW-NB15: a comprehensive data set for network intrusion detection systems (UNSW-NB15 network data set). In Proceedings of the 2015 military communications and information systems conference (MilCIS); IEEE, Year; 1-6.
- Akgun, D.; S. Hizal; U. Cavusoglu. A new DDoS attacks intrusion detection model based on deep learning for cybersecurity. Computers & Security 2022, 118, 102748.
- Tavallaee, M.; E. Bagheri; W. Lu; A.A. Ghorbani. A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE symposium on computational intelligence for security and defense applications; Ieee, Year; 1-6.
- Liu, L.; G. Engelen; T. Lynar; D. Essam; W. Joosen. Error prevalence in nids datasets: A case study on cic-ids-2017 and cse-cic-ids-2018. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE conference on communications and network security (CNS); IEEE, Year; 254-62.
- Chetouane, A.; K. Karoui; G. Nemri. An Intelligent ML-Based IDS Framework for DDoS Detection in the SDN Environment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia Intelligence; Springer, Year; 18-31.
- Bala, R.; R. Nagpal. A review on kdd cup99 and nsl nsl-kdd dataset. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science 2019, 10(2).
- Ahmed, Y.; K. Beyioku; M. Yousefi. Securing smart cities through machine learning: A honeypot-driven approach to attack detection in Internet of Things ecosystems. IET Smart Cities 2024, 6(3), 180-98.
- Soheily-Khah, S.; P.-F. Marteau; N. Béchet. Intrusion detection in network systems through hybrid supervised and unsupervised mining process-a detailed case study on the ISCX benchmark dataset. 2017.
- Lippmann, R.; J.W. Haines; D.J. Fried; J. Korba; K. Das. The 1999 DARPA off-line intrusion detection evaluation. Computer networks 2000, 34(4), 579-95.
- Sekhar, C.; K.V. Rao; M.K. Prasad. Classification of the DDoS Attack over Flash Crowd with DNN using World Cup 1998 and CAIDA 2007 Datasets. i-Manager's Journal on Software Engineering 2021, 15(3), 29.
- Nigmatullin, R.; A. Ivchenko; S. Dorokhin. Differentiation of sliding rescaled ranges: New approach to encrypted and VPN traffic detection. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference Engineering and Telecommunication (En&T); IEEE, Year; 1-5.
- Jose, J.; D.V. Jose. Deep learning algorithms for intrusion detection systems in internet of things using CIC-IDS 2017 dataset. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) 2023, 13(1), 1134-41.
- Mirsky, Y.; T. Doitshman; Y. Elovici; A. Shabtai. Kitsune: an ensemble of autoencoders for online network intrusion detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.09089 2018.
- Lefoane, M.; I. Ghafir; S. Kabir; I.-U. Awan. Unsupervised learning for feature selection: A proposed solution for botnet detection in 5g networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 2022, 19(1), 921-29.
- Abbasi, F.; M. Naderan; S.E. Alavi. Anomaly detection in Internet of Things using feature selection and classification based on Logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Network on N-BaIoT dataset. In Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Internet of Things and Applications (IoT); IEEE, Year; 1-7.
- Peterson, J.M.; J.L. Leevy; T.M. Khoshgoftaar. A review and analysis of the bot-iot dataset. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE); IEEE, Year; 20-27.
- Daoudi, N.; K. Allix; T.F. Bissyandé; J. Klein. A deep dive inside drebin: An explorative analysis beyond android malware detection scores. ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security 2022, 25(2), 1-28.
- Düzgün, B.; A. Çayır; F. Demirkıran; C.N. Kahya; B. Gençaydın; H. Dağ. Benchmark Static API Call Datasets for Malware Family Classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.15205 2021.
- Shinde, O.; A. Khobragade; P. Agrawal. Static malware detection of Ember windows-PE API call using machine learning. In Proceedings of the AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing, Year.
- Sharma, A.; H. Babbar. Detecting Cyber Threats in Real-Time: A Supervised Learning Perspective on the CTU-13 Dataset. In Proceedings of the 2024 5th International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET); IEEE, Year; 1-5.
- Letteri, I.; G. Della Penna; L. Di Vita; M.T. Grifa. MTA-KDD'19: A Dataset for Malware Traffic Detection. In Proceedings of the Itasec; , Year; 153-65.
- Nkongolo, M.; J.P. Van Deventer; S.M. Kasongo. Ugransome1819: A novel dataset for anomaly detection and zero-day threats. Information 2021, 12(10), 405.
- Gad, A.R.; A.A. Nashat; T.M. Barkat. Intrusion detection system using machine learning for vehicular ad hoc networks based on ToN-IoT dataset. IEEE access 2021, 9, 142206-17.
- Zachos, G.; I. Essop; G. Mantas; K. Porfyrakis; J.C. Ribeiro; J. Rodriguez. Generating IoT edge network datasets based on the TON_IoT telemetry dataset. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 26th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD); IEEE, Year; 1-6.
- Rustam, F.; M. Salauddin; U. Saeed; A.D. Jurcut. Dual-Approach Machine Learning for Robust Cyber-Attack Detection in Water Distribution System. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Internet of Things;, Year; 248-54.
- Khan, A.A.Z. Misuse intrusion detection using machine learning for gas pipeline SCADA networks. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the international conference on security and management (SAM); The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer …, Year; 84-90.
- Tseng, S.-M.; Y.-Q. Wang; Y.-C. Wang. Multi-Class Intrusion Detection Based on Transformer for IoT Networks Using CIC-IoT-2023 Dataset. Future Internet 2024, 16(8), 284.
- Wardhani, R.W.; D.S.C. Putranto; U. Jo; H. Kim. Toward enhanced attack detection and explanation in intrusion detection system-based IoT environment data. IEEE access 2023, 11, 131661-76.
- Stoian, N.-A. Machine learning for anomaly detection in iot networks: Malware analysis on the iot-23 data set. University of Twente, 2020.
- Selvam, R.; S. Velliangiri. An improving intrusion detection model based on novel CNN technique using recent CIC-IDS datasets. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Distributed Computing and Optimization Techniques (ICDCOT); IEEE, Year; 1-6.
- Kalidindi, A.; B.R. Koti; C. Srilakshmi; K.M. Buddaraju; A.R. Kandi; G.S.S. Makutam. Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for Enhancing Network Intrusion Detection and Classification Using DarkNet CIC2020. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering 2024, 20(15).




| Ref | Dataset | Contribution | Attack Type | Category of Attack Types | Feature Selection | Feature Extraction | AL/ML-based Attack Detection Approach | Hyperparameters Tuning | Hybrid Approach | Accuracy/Results | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [4] | ASCAD | Optimization of Convolutional Autoencoders for Side-Channel Attacks | Side-Channel Attack (Power Analysis) | Network-based | - | Convolutional Autoencoder (CAE) | MLP, CNN, Template Attack (TA) | Optuna | No | 37% fewer traces needed for attack, reduced trainable parameters by factor of 29 | |
| [5] | CICIDS2017, UNSW_NB15 | AdacDeep: Enhanced Genetic Algorithm + Deep Autoencoder + DFFNN | Multiple attack types (e.g., DDoS, DoS, Brute Force) | Device-based | - | Deep Autoencoder (DAE) | Deep Feedforward Neural Network (DFFNN) | EGA | Yes, Enhanced Genetic Algorithm + Deep Autoencoder + DFFNN | Improvements in accuracy of 0.22% to 35% | |
| [6] | SOREL-20M, EMBER-2018 | AutoML for deep learning-based malware detection in both static and online environments. | Malware detection | Cloud services based | - | Deep learning-driven automated feature extraction | Feedforward Neural Network (FFNN), CNN | TPE | Yes, AutoML combines static, dynamic, and online analysis methods. | On the EMBER-2018 and SOREL-20M datasets, the models achieved accuracies of 95.8% and 99 %, respectively. | |
| [7] | IoTID20, UNSW-NB15 | Proposed a hybrid approach combining CNN and GRU to excel in capturing spatial and temporal dependencies in the data. | IoT-related intrusion detection | Network-based | PSO | CNN | CNN-GRU | Grid Search | Yes - CNN-GRU | 99.60% accuracy on IoTID20 and 99.14% on UNSW-NB15 dataset. | |
| [8] | Kitsune and TON-IoT | Proposed two hybrid models CNN-LSTM and CNN-GRU to enhance IoT security | Multiple attacks (DDoS, Telnet , password, Injection and backdoor) | Network-based | - | CNN | CNN-LSTM and CNN-GRU | Grid Search | Yes - CNN-LSTM and CNN-GRU | 99.6% accuracy on Kitsune and 99.00% TON_IoT dataset | |
| [9] | DS2OS and UNSW-NB15 | Proposed a novel hybrid deep random neural network for cyberattack detection in IIoT. | Multiple attacks (DoS, Worms, Scan, Spying and Fuzzers) | Network-based | ARM | DRaNN | HDRaNN | Manual approach |
Yes -HDRaNN | 98% and 99% for DS2OS and UNSW-NB15 | |
| [10] | NSL-KDD and BoT-IoT | Implementing a distributed framework based on deep learning to simultaneously control various sources of vulnerability. | Multiple attacks (DDoS, keylogging, Data theft, U2R and R2L) | Network-based | - | Standard feature selection methods. | FFNN and LSTM | Hyperband | No | Achieved up to 99.95% accuracy across various setups. | |
| [11] | N_BaIoT | Proposes a robust AttackNet model for the detection of various botnet attacks in IIoT. | Multiple attacks (DDoS, Malware, MiTM, and Zero day attacks) | Network-based | - | CNN | CNN-GRU | - | Yes - CNN-GRU | Accuracy of 99.75% across 10 given classes. | |
| [12] | CSE-CIC-IDS2018 | Develop a hybrid model for attack detection that leverages autoencoders for effective feature extraction and DT classifiers to achieve high accuracy and reduce overfitting. | Multiple attacks (DDoS, Malware, MiTM,, phishing, Supply chain and Zero-day attacks) | Network-based | Auto -encoders | LASSO, Random Forest and Boruta | Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes, neural networks, and ensemble methods | - | Yes - Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes, neural networks, Random Forest, and XGBoost | Overall accuracy reached around 94.54% | |
| [13] | N_BaIoT | Proposed a DNN for feature extraction using LSTM to manage sequential data. |
DDoS, Mirai and Gafgyt | Network-based | - | Done implicitly by the DNN layers | DNN-LSTM | - | Yes - Deep Neural Network(DNN) and Long Short-Term Memory(LSTM) | 99.96% | |
| [14] | NSL-KDD, UNSW-NB15 | Proposed hybrid pre-processing method combines PCA and feature engineering via DFS to develop meaningful features for network intrusion detection. | Multiple attacks (DDoS, Malware, MiTM,, phishing, Supply chain and Zero-day attacks) | Network-based | PCA | CNN | CNN, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, Decision Tree, Ada Boost, Bagging | Manual tuning | No | NSL-KDD Achieved 90.14% UNSW-NB15 Achieved 95.7% |
|
| [15] | CIC-IDS 2017, UNSW-NB15, and WSN-DS | Proposed a CNN-LSTM Hybrid Deep Learning model for an intrusion detection system that merges the strengths of both algorithms. | Multiple attacks (DDoS, Malware, MiTM, Brute force, Web based, Worms, Blackhole attacks) | Network-based | Select-K-Best | CNN | CNN-LSTM | Manual tuning | Yes – CNN-LSTM | CIC-IDS achieved 99.6%, UNSW-NB15 93.7%, and WSN-DS achieved 99.5% | |
| [16] | IOT23, CICIDS2017, and NSL KDD | Merge long short-term memory (LSTM) and autoencoder (AE) for feature-rich scalable attack detection. | Probe, R2L, U2R, DDoS, Botnet, and HeartBeat | Network-based | PCC | AE | LSTM and AE | Manual tuning | Yes - LSTM and AE | 97.7% achieved on NSL KDD dataset, 99% achieved on CICIDS2017 dataset, and 98.7% achieved on IOT23 dataset | |
|
Our Study |
Edge-IIoTset and WUSTL-IIOT-2021 | Proposed a multibranch hybrid model based on MLP and BiLSTM | DDoS, scanning, injection, brute force, infiltration, MiTM, and privilege escalation | Network-based | DAE | DAE | Hybrid model based on MLP and BiLSTM | Optuna | Yes – DA - MBA | Almost 99% accuracy on both datasets. |
| Dataset categorization | Available Datasets | Ref |
|---|---|---|
| IIoT and ICS Datasets | Edge IIoT Dataset | [17] |
| ICS-LTU2022 | [18] | |
| SWaT Dataset | [19] | |
| BETH Dataset | [20] | |
| X-IIoTID Dataset | [21] | |
| WUSTL-IIOT-2021 | [22] | |
| Network Traffic Datasets | UNSW-NB15 | [23] |
| CIC-DDoS 2019 | [24] | |
| KDD Cup 1999 | [25] | |
| CSE-CIC-IDS 2018 | [26] | |
| SDN-DDOS-TCP-SYN | [27] | |
| NSL-KDD Dataset | [28] | |
| Canadian Institute of Cybersecurity (CIC) honeynet | [29] | |
| ISCX IDS 2012 | [30] | |
| DARPA 1999 | [31] | |
| CAIDA 2007 | [32] | |
| ISCXVPN 2016 | [33] | |
| CIC-IDS 2017 | [34] | |
| Kitsune Network Attack | [35] | |
| NSS Mirai Dataset | [36] | |
| Botnet Datasets | N-BaIoT Dataset | [37] |
| Bot-IoT Dataset | [38] | |
| The Drebin Dataset | [39] | |
| Malware Analysis Datasets | VirusShare Datasets | [40] |
| EMBER-2018 | [41] | |
| CTU-13 Dataset | [42] | |
| Anomaly Detection Datasets | MTA-KDD'19 Dataset | [43] |
| UGR'16 (UG Ransom) | [44] | |
| TON-IoT Dataset | [45] | |
| Telemetry Datasets | Ton IoT Telemetry 2021 | [46] |
| BATADAL (Battle of the Attack Detection Algorithms) | [47] | |
| Operational Technology (OT) Datasets | Gas Pipeline Dataset | [48] |
| CIC IoT 2023 | [49] | |
| General IoT Datasets | IoTID2020 | [50] |
| IoT-23 | [51] | |
| CICIDS 2017 – CICIDS 2022 | [52] | |
| CICDarknet 2020 | [53] |
| Types of Attacks | Training | Testing | Validation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Backdoor | 17444 | 3716 | 3702 |
| 2 | DDoS HTTP | 34890 | 7466 | 7555 |
| 3 | DDoS ICMP | 81598 | 17389 | 17449 |
| 4 | DDoS TCP | 34897 | 7593 | 7572 |
| 5 | DDoS UDP | 84965 | 18346 | 18257 |
| 6 | Fingerprinting | 705 | 154 | 142 |
| 7 | MITM, Encoded Value | 840 | 189 | 185 |
| 8 | Normal | 1130977 | 242569 | 242097 |
| 9 | Password | 35084 | 7466 | 7603 |
| 10 | Port Scanning | 15774 | 3440 | 3350 |
| 11 | Ransomware | 7718 | 1597 | 1610 |
| 12 | SQL Injection | 35973 | 7578 | 7652 |
| 13 | Uploading | 26159 | 5637 | 5838 |
| 14 | Vulnerability Scanner | 35284 | 7335 | 7491 |
| 15 | XSS | 11132 | 2405 | 2378 |
| 16 | Total Attack Dataset | 343363 | 102311 | 102784 |
| Aspects | Specification | Version |
|---|---|---|
| Resources | Processor | Intel(R) Core(TM) Processor |
| Generation | 13th | |
| OS | Microsoft Windows 10 Enterprise | |
| RAM | 32 GB | |
| GPU | NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB | |
| Environment | PyCharm IDE | PyCharm 2024.1 (Professional Edition) |
| Python Language | 3.9.18 | |
| Libraries | Pandas | 2.2.2 |
| Numpy | 1.26.4 | |
| Tensorflow | 2.16.1 | |
| Scikit-Learn | 1.4.2 | |
| Keras | 3.3.3 | |
| Matplotlib | 3.9.0 | |
| Seaborn | 0.13.2 |
| Category | Hyperparameters | Model Component | Configurations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Encoding Dimension | DAE | 16 – 64 |
| Activation Function | DAE and Hybrid Model | Relu | |
| MLP Units | Hybrid Model | 16 – 64 | |
| LSTM Units | Hybrid Model | 16 – 64 | |
| Noise and Regularization | Noise Factor | DAE | 0.1 – 0.5 |
| L2 Regularization | DAE and Hybrid Model | 0.01 – 0.1 | |
| Dropout Rate | DAE and Hybrid Model | 0.3 – 0.6 | |
| Training | Batch Size | DAE and Hybrid Model | 256 |
| Epoch | DAE and Hybrid Model | 50 | |
| Early Stopping | DAE and Hybrid Model | 10 | |
| Learning Rate | DAE and Hybrid Model | 1e-5 – 1e-3 | |
| Optimizer | DAE and Hybrid Model | Adam | |
| Loss Function | Loss Type | DAE and Hybrid Model | MSE |
| Accuracy | Loss | Precision | Recall | F1 Score | Time per attack detection (Sec) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLP | WUSTL | 0.9279 | 0.6878 | 0.9399 | 0.9323 | 0.9234 | 0.000027 |
| EdgeIIoT | 0.9009 | 0.3172 | 0.8946 | 0.9146 | 0.9045 | 0.000029 | |
| BiLSTM | WUSTL | 0.9698 | 0.1134 | 0.9660 | 0.9754 | 0.9707 | 0.000020 |
| EdgeIIoT | 0.9717 | 0.1029 | 0.9655 | 0.9798 | 0.9726 | 0.000019 | |
| Proposed Model | WUSTL | 0.9948 | 0. 0297 | 0.9952 | 0.9917 | 0.9929 | 0.000050 |
| EdgeIIoT | 0.9984 | 0.0408 | 0.9867 | 0.9913 | 0.9753 | 0.000026 |
| Hyperparameters | Best Configurations | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| WUSTL | EdgeIIoT | ||
| 1 | Encoding Dimension | 38 | 53 |
| 2 | Noise Factor | 0.2298 | 0.1036 |
| 3 | LSTM Unit | 51 | 58 |
| 4 | MLP Unit | 24 | 56 |
| 5 | Dropout Rate | 0.55 | 0.51 |
| 6 | L2 Regularization | 0.029 | 0.041 |
| 7 | Learning Rate | 0.000024 | 0.000025 |
| 8 | Epoch | 50 | 50 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).