Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Anionic Detergents as Eluates for Microscale Isolation of Antigen-Specific Serum Immunoglobulins

Submitted:

17 November 2025

Posted:

19 November 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
The detailed characterization of antigen-specific serum antibodies is hindered by the lack of efficient, gentle isolation methods. Standard column affinity chromatography, despite being a powerful purification tool, presents practical challenges for this application, including high antigen consumption, and elution conditions that risk inducing antibody polyreactivity. Conventional acidic elution often compromises antibody integrity. This study introduces a novel microscale method for isolating specific immunoglobulins using anionic detergents as mild eluents. We employed antigen-functionalized hydrogel microarrays and magnetic beads as micro-immunosorbents. Among the detergents tested, sodium lauroyl glutamate (SLG) was optimal, achieving up to 78.3% recovery of functional antibodies. The optimized protocol including recovering G25-Sephadex gel filtration step effectively isolated specific antibodies from complex serum, with functional bioactivity retained between 58.5% and 85.3%. Multiplex immunoassays confirmed the high specificity of the isolated antibodies and the absence of detergent-induced polyreactivity. The method was successfully adapted for both specific antibody (virus, dietary and autoimmune) and total IgG isolation, demonstrating versatility across platforms. This work establishes a robust, efficient, and gentle workflow for obtaining high-purity, bioactive antibodies, enabling their subsequent in-depth analysis for research applications.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Disease progression can significantly alter antibody properties through distinct mechanisms. First, post-translational modifications, such as shifts in glycosylation patterns during diseases, can alter both antigen binding affinity and effector functions by altering Fc receptor interactions [1]. Current evidence indicates that IgG glycosylation profiles are altered in cancer, autoimmune, infectious and other diseases affecting both the total pool and certain antigen-specific antibodies [2]. Second, the context of persistent infection itself can drive the formation of polyreactive antibodies, a potential precursor to autoimmunity [3]. Finally, the hypothesis of molecular mimicry posits that structural homology between pathogen proteins and self-antigens can misdirect the immune response, leading to the production of autoreactive antibodies [4]. Consequently, investigating antibody glycosylation patterns, polyreactivity, and cross-reactivity is crucial for elucidating the mechanisms that initiate and drive disease progression. However, such analysis is severely constrained by the masking effect of the abundant, non-specific immunoglobulin pool in serum, which obscures critical changes in low-abundance, antigen-specific fractions. The methodology developed in this work directly addresses this bottleneck by enabling the isolation of purified antigen-specific antibodies, thereby providing a critical tool for elucidating their unique structural and functional characteristics in health and disease.
Affinity chromatography represents the benchmark technique for isolating specific proteins from complex biological mixtures. This method is particularly valuable for purifying serum antibodies, as it yields isolates that faithfully retain the native immunoglobulin classes, glycosylation profiles, and antigen-binding avidity. Despite its conceptual advantages, conventional column affinity chromatography presents significant practical limitations for the isolation of low-abundance specific antibodies. The method demands large quantities of purified, stable antigen for sorbent synthesis, creating a major cost barrier. The subsequent elution step further complicates the process, introducing sample dilution and frequent protein loss during concentration and buffer exchange. Consequently, the column chromatographic isolation of specific antibodies from multiple samples remains a labor-intensive, time-consuming, and resource-heavy endeavor. Alternative approaches have circumvented columns by utilizing other platforms, such as the Western blot membrane strips employed by Kurien et al. [5] or the immunoassay plates used by Mendis et al. [6]. Meanwhile, the advancement of magnetic particle-based technologies has facilitated the development of miniaturized methods for protein isolation from complex mixtures, significantly expanding their application potential [7].
Acidic buffers (pH 2.5-3.0) remain a common choice for eluting antibodies from antigen-affinity matrices due to their simplicity and low cost. However, even with brief exposure and immediate neutralization, the low pH can cause irreversible protein degradation, rendering the antibodies unsuitable for functional activity studies. Beyond degradation and aggregation [8], a more insidious consequence is the induction of polyreactivity, whereby previously monospecific antibodies can develop non-specific binding to multiple unrelated antigens following acid exposure[9,10,11].
Mild elution agents offer a gentler alternative for dissociating antibodies from affinity matrices. While the common anionic detergent sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) is a potent denaturant that irreversibly disrupts protein structures, several of its analogs interact with proteins in a milder, reversible manner [12]. Detergents like sodium lauryl sarcosinate (Sarkosyl) and sodium lauryl glutamate (SLG) are known for their ability to solubilize proteins from inclusion bodies with minimal denaturation [13,14]. It is hypothesized that these milder detergents engage in limited protein penetration, primarily interacting with surface hydrophobic regions to induce transient conformational changes without achieving complete denaturation. When applied to antigen-antibody complexes, this mechanism enables complex dissociation while minimizing damage to the antibody’s native structure. Critically, the subsequent removal of detergent residues following antibody isolation facilitates substantial recovery of bioactivity, representing a key advantage over conventional denaturing elution methods.
This study aimed to develop micro-scale workflow for isolating antigen-specific serum antibodies using array- and bead-based platforms, with anionic detergents employed as a gentle elution strategy to preserve antibody functionality.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Serum Sample

Serum samples were collected from a cohort of patients with autoimmune diseases and control subjects [15]. From this collection, a sample that was positive for IgG against bovine serum albumin (BSA), cytomegalovirus (CMV) protein pp150 or thyroglobulin (Tg) was selected based on a multiplex assay.

2.2. Protein Arrays

Hydrogel arrays with immobilized proteins were manufactured by co-polymerization immobilization, following a previously described protocol [16].

2.2.1. Single-Antigen Capture Arrays

For Capture array the following proteins were used for immobilization: BSA (A7030, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), recombinant thyroglobulin (8RTG4, HyTest, Turku, Finland), recombinant cytomegalovirus pp150 protein (RE003, Xema Co., Ltd., Moscow, Russia), recombinant human insulin protein (ab123768, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The array layout was identical for all Capture arrays, regardless of the antigen used (Figure 1).
For method development, a Capture array with immobilized insulin was employed in combination with Cy5.5 fluorescently labeled monoclonal antibodies against insulin (RC3A6, HyTest, Finland).

2.2.2. Multi-Antigen Array for Multiplex Assay

The multi-antigen array contained 120 elements with 58 immobilized proteins, corresponding to 47 unique proteins. The list of proteins for the multi-antigen array is provided in Table S1. The microarray layout is shown in Figure 2.

2.3. Magnetic Beads

Total IgG isolation was performed using ready-to-use, commercially available protein G-coated magnetic beads (786-904, Geno Technology, St. Louis, MO USA).
For specific antibodies isolation the following proteins were used for immobilization: BSA (A7030, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), recombinant Thyroglobulin (8RTG4, HyTest, Turku, Finland), recombinant Cytomegalovirus pp150 protein (RE003, Xema Co., Ltd., Moscow, Russia). Protein was covalently immobilized on amino-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles (iron oxide, 300–400 nm; K0501, Sileks, Moscow, Russia) using glutaraldehyde crosslinking, following the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief: 100 μl of magnetic particle solution (5 mg/ml) was washed, resuspended in 250 μl of PBS, 250 μl of 25% glutaraldehyde were added, and incubated in the dark for 3 hours with gentle rocking. After four washes with PBS, the particles were resuspended in 500 µl PBS, supplemented with 100 µl protein (0.2 mg/ml) in PBS containing 0.01% Tween20 (PBSt), incubated overnight with gentle rocking, washed four times with PBS again, and resuspended in 100 µl PBSt.

2.4. Anionic Detergents

The following detergents were used: sodium lauroyl glutamate (sc-495823, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA), N-Lauroylsarcosine (Sodium salt) (L-5125, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SB-GC204005-01, ServieceBio, Wuhan, China). The preparation of stock solutions differed for each anionic detergent. The protocol for SLG dissolution involved initial addition to milli-Q water (up to 20%) with subsequent gradual titration with a 10 M NaOH solution until clear. SDS was dissolved in water with gentle stirring and heating (~50 °C). Sarkosyl was readily soluble in water. The stock solutions were stored at room temperature and warmed before use if necessary. Working solutions of the detergents (SDS, 0.006–0.5%; Sarcosyl, 0.05–2.0%; SLG, 0.25–10.0%) were prepared fresh in milli-Q water immediately prior to use.

2.5. Micro-Scale Serum Derived Antibodies Isolation

2.5.1. Protein Array Protocol

The serum sample was diluted 1:50 in immunoassay buffer, and 100 µl of the dilution was applied to the array. Following an overnight incubation at 37 °C, the array was washed with PBSt for 20 minutes, rinsed with water, and dried. Subsequently, 100 µl of a freshly prepared eluent containing an anionic detergent was added, followed by incubation for 1 h at 37 °C. The final eluate was then carefully collected by pipette.

2.5.2. Magnetic Beads Protocol

Total IgG Isolation

Patient serum samples (20 µL) were added to tubes containing 50 µL of magnetic beads coated with Protein G (786-904, Geno Technology, St. Louis, MO USA) and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature under end-over-end rotation. Following incubation, the beads were washed three times with 200 µL of binding buffer, with the supernatant removed after each wash. After the final wash, 100 µL of elution buffer was added to the magnetic beads and incubated for 10 minutes, with periodic resuspension. When an acidic elution buffer (0.1 M Gly-HCL, pH 2.5) was used, the eluate was neutralized with 1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.5) at ratio of 1:7.

The Antigen-Specific Immunoglobulin Isolation

Antibodies were isolated from 20 µL of blood serum using 50 µL of magnetic particle suspension with immobilized protein. Magnetic particles were blocked for 1 hour in 100 μl of EveryBlot Blocking Buffer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), washed and resuspended in 500 μl of PBSt, a blood serum sample (20 μl) was added, incubated for 1 hour with gentle rocking, washed three times with 500 μl PBSt and resuspended in 100 μl of PBSt. 100 μl of Elution Buffer (0.1 M Gly-HCL, pH 2.5 or 2% SLG in PBS) were added to the particles, incubated for 10 minutes, periodically mixing by pipetting. In case of acidic elution, the eluate was immediately neutralized with 20 μl of 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.5).

2.6. Functional Recovery of Individual Antigen-Specific Immunoglobulins

2.6.1. Gel Filtration

The obtained eluates (100 µL) were applied to spin columns (7326204, Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA) filled with Sephadex G-25 coarse (17-0034-02, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) and pre-equilibrated with PBS and centrifuged at 1 500 g. The resulting probe was used for further analysis.

2.6.2. Dialisys

The obtained eluates (100 µL) were dialyzed using Slide-A-Lyzer MINI dialysis devices (3.5 kDa MWCO; Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) against three changes of PBS (pH 7.2, 300 mL) under constant stirring at RT.

2.7. Analysis of Isolated Immunoglobulins

2.7.1. SDS-PAGE and Western-Blot Analysis

The obtained samples were separated by electrophoresis under denaturing conditions using a 10% resolving gel. Protein bands were visualized by staining with either Coomassie R-250 (786-495, Geno Technology, USA) or silver nitrate (G2080, Servicebio, Wuhan, Hubei, China). The proteins were then transferred to a PVDF membrane (1620262, Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). Following the transfer, the membrane was blocked overnight with EveryBlot Blocking Buffer (12010020, Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). The membrane was incubated for one hour with polyclonal goat anti-human IgG antibodies (31163 Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and then for one hour with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-goat IgG antibodies (S0010, Affinity Biosciences, Loveland, CO, USA). After washing with PBS containing 0.01% Tween 20, the immune complexes were visualized using the Clarity™ Western ECL substrate kit (1705061, Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA).

2.7.2. Multiplex Immunoassay

For the multiplex immunoassay, both original blood serum samples and specific antibodies isolated from them were used. Serum samples were diluted at a 1:50 ratio, and isolated antibodies were analyzed without dilution. IgG antibodies targeting 60 immobilized proteins were detected using a previously developed assay [16]. Microarrays were blocked with 1% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) at room temperature (RT) for 1 hour. Samples (100 µL) were applied onto the microarrays. Following an overnight incubation at 37 °C, the arrays were subjected to an intermediate wash with PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 for 20 minutes. Antigen-antibody complexes were then detected using a fluorescently labeled anti-human IgG antibody (31163, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) during a two-hour incubation at 37 °C. Finally, the microarrays were washed with PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 for 30 minutes, rinsed with buffer, and dried prior to scanning.
Fluorescence images of microarrays were obtained using a proprietary laser-excited microarray analyzer [17]. Signal quantification was performed with proprietary software. For each group of n elements containing identical antigens, the resulting signal (In) was calculated as the mean fluorescence intensity of the corresponding spots. Elution efficiency (%) was calculated as the ratio of the median signal from the corresponding array elements after elution to their initial signal. Recovery efficiency (%) was calculated as the ratio of the median signal from the corresponding array elements for isolated specific antibodies to the signal obtained from the same element group during the initial sample analysis.

2.8. Direct Analysis of Fluorescently Labeled Antibodies on the Microarray

Cy5.5-labeled antibodies were diluted in PBS containing 0.14% PVA and 0.14% PVP. A 100 µL volume of the antibody solution (at concentrations ranging from 500 ng/mL to 2.0 µg/mL) was applied to the microarrays. After a two-hour incubation at 37 °C, the microarrays were washed with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 for 30 minutes, rinsed with distilled water, and dried. The following antibodies were used: monoclonal anti-insulin (clone RC3A6, HyTest, Finland), polyclonal anti-BSA (A11133, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and goat anti-human IgG (31163, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific).

3. Results

3.1. Anionic Detergents as Eluate

This study describes a mild elution method for recovering antibodies from an immunosorbent while preserving their specific antigen-binding activity. The approach utilized micro-immunosorbents, such as microarrays or magnetic particles, containing microquantities of covalently immobilized antigens. The procedure involved three stages: (1) incubation of a serum sample with the micro-immunosorbent to facilitate the formation of specific complexes between the immobilized antigens and target antibodies; (2) elution of the captured antibodies using a non-denaturing anionic detergent; and (3) subsequent purification of the isolated antibodies from the eluting agent to restore their antigen-binding activity for further analysis (Figure 3).
To optimize the elution protocol, a series of experiments was conducted using protein microarrays to evaluate key parameters, including the choice and concentration of the anionic detergent, buffer composition, elution time, temperature, and the subsequent detergent removal method. The experimental setup employed a capture microarray with immobilized insulin and fluorescently labeled (Cy5.5) monoclonal anti-insulin antibodies. The assay was designed in a direct format, forming a specific “immobilized insulin - anti-insulin antibody” complex within microarray elements (100 ± 20 µm in diameter). This design allowed for the direct fluorescence monitoring of three key processes: the initial antibody capture, their desorption during elution, and the functional re-binding capacity of the isolated antibodies to a fresh microarray.
Solutions of anionic detergents—SDS (0.006–0.5%), Sarcosyl (0.05–2.0%), and SLG (0.25–10.0%) were evaluated as eluents. The antibody recovery efficiency as a function of detergent concentration exhibited a distinct bell-shaped profile for all tested agents, as exemplified by the data for SLG in Figure 4a. Each detergent demonstrated a well-defined optimal concentration that yielded maximum recovery, with deviations to either lower or higher concentrations resulting in diminished efficiency. Subsequent analysis of the eluted antibodies’ functional integrity in a re-capture assay revealed maximum bioactivity recoveries of 16.9% for 0.025% SDS, 44.8% for 1% Sarcosyl, and 78.3% for 2% SLG, relative to the initial input (Figure 4b).
The elution kinetics for the 2% SLG solution was evaluated over a time range of 10 minutes to 16 hours (Figure 4c). An elution time of one hour was determined to be optimal, representing a saturation point beyond which no further increase in efficiency was observed. Shorter incubation times were insufficient for complete dissociation of the antigen-antibody complexes. The process was found to be largely temperature-independent, as similar recovery yields were obtained at 4 °C, room temperature, and 37 °C. For methodological consistency with the serum incubation and antibody assay steps, which were performed at 37 °C, this temperature was selected for the standard elution protocol.
The resulting eluates were purified either by dialysis or gel filtration using Sephadex G-25 spin columns. Gel filtration was selected as the primary method due to its comparable efficiency to dialysis coupled with significantly faster processing and highly reproducible eluate volumes. Under the optimized protocol (2% SLG, 37 °C for 1 hour, followed by gel filtration), the model system using fluorescently labeled anti-insulin antibodies spiked into serum (500 ng/ml) achieved an 80% desorption efficiency while preserving 78% of the antibodies’ specific bioactivity, as confirmed by a re-capture assay on a new microarray (Figure 4d).

3.2. Micro-Scale Isolation of Serum Antibodies Using Anionic Detergent Elution: Proof of Concept

Ten serum samples containing multiple autoantibodies, specifically IgG antibodies targeting thyroglobulin (Tg), bovine serum albumin (BSA) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) protein pp150, were selected from a previously characterized cohort [15] based on a multiplex assay. Following the developed protocol (Figure 3), the samples were incubated on capture microarrays (Figure 1) with the corresponding immobilized antigens. Subsequently, captured antibodies were eluted using a 2% SLG solution. The resulting eluate was purified via gel filtration on a spin column and then analyzed on a multi-antigen microarray (Figure 2). For each sample (n=10) and each target antigen (n=4), the isolation procedure yielded specific signals on the multi-antigen array with no detectable cross-reactivity. The procedure successfully preserved 58.5– 85.3% of the antibodies’ specific bioactivity, a range influenced by the initial antibody titer and the specific capture antigen used. The results for these samples are presented below to demonstrate the practical application of the method.
To validate the isolation specificity, the original sample (Figure 5a) and antibodies eluted from Tg-, and CMV-specific capture microarrays (Figure 5b-c, respectively) were analyzed in parallel on a multi-antigen microarray.

3.3. Evaluation of the Developed Elution Method Using Magnetic Particles as an Immunosorbent

The developed elution protocol was further validated using magnetic beads as an alternative immunosorbent platform. Three proteins — BSA, CMV pp150, and Tg — were covalently immobilized onto amino-functionalized magnetic particles via glutaraldehyde cross-linking. To ensure direct comparability with the microarray experiments, identical antigen preparations were used for both the magnetic beads and the microarray surfaces. Antigen-specific antibodies were isolated using two distinct elution methods: 1) a standard manufacturer’s protocol involving acidic elution (Glycine-HCl, pH 2.5) followed by immediate neutralization; b) the newly developed mild elution protocol using an anionic detergent (2% SLG) followed by purification on Sephadex G-25 spin columns.
All isolated specific antibody fractions targeting the three antigens (CMV, BSA, Tg), obtained through both 2% SLG elution method and a standard acidic buffer approach, were subsequently analyzed on a multi-antigen array (Figure 6). The resulting specific signals (Figure 6 c-e) were compared against reference signals derived from the original sample applied directly to the same array (Figure 6a). To account for potential nonspecific interactions, control experiments were performed by probing the multi-antigen microarray with the detection antibody alone (goat anti-human IgG; Figure 6b) and with fluorescently labeled anti-BSA antibodies (Figure 6f), the latter controlling for interference from anti-BSA antibodies in the immunoassay.
To further validate the broad applicability of the method, the mild anionic detergent elution protocol was adapted for the isolation of total immunoglobulin G (IgG) from blood sera. This was achieved using commercial magnetic beads conjugated with Protein G. The efficacy of the elution method was evaluated by comparing the total IgG fractions isolated via the standard acidic buffer versus the 2% SLG protocol. The integrity and purity of the isolated IgG fractions were subsequently analyzed by electrophoresis and Western blot (Figure 7).
Analysis of the total IgG fractions isolated from blood sera by electrophoresis revealed distinct bands at 50 and 25 kDa, corresponding to the molecular weights of reduced IgG (Figure 7b). The absence of clear differences between the bands from acid buffer elution and SLG elution (lanes 1 and 2) indicates comparable efficiency of the two methods. The presence of an additional weak band at 67 kDa in lane 2, co-migrating with human serum albumin (lane 3), suggests that the acidic buffer provides more stringent elution conditions. Both methods (lanes 1 and 2) showed a faint band at 22 kDa, consistent with the molecular weight of protein G. The efficiency of SLG elution was demonstrated using different blood serum samples (lanes 4, 5, 6). Western blot analysis confirmed the successful isolation of IgG using both acid buffer and SLG elution (Figure 7a).

4. Discussion

Affinity chromatography is a cornerstone technique for the selective purification of antibodies, leveraging the specific and reversible interaction between an immobilized antigen and its target. The process involves two phases: the capture of the target molecule from the solution onto the solid-phase ligand, followed by its elution, which involves disrupting the specific complex to release the purified protein. A critical requirement is that the elution process preserves the protein’s native conformation and biological activity. Various strategies can be employed to disrupt the antigen-antibody complex, including shifts in pH or ionic strength, and the application of chaotropic agents, organic solvents, high-charge eluents, or competitive elution [18]. The mechanism of the eluting agent is a key determinant, as it can induce either reversible, short-lived unfolding or irreversible denaturation of the antibody.
Acidic buffers, such as glycine-HCl (pH 2.5-3.0), represent a gold standard in laboratory practice for target antibodies elution due to its availability and versatility. The mechanism involves the protonation of charged amino acid residues, primarily histidines, within the antigen-antibody interface. This protonation disrupts electrostatic interactions by shifting the net charge of the molecule and can also compromise hydrogen bonding and alter the isoelectric point. However, this aggressive approach also perturbs the antibody’s tertiary structure, causing partial unfolding and exposure of hydrophobic regions. Such structural alterations frequently lead to a loss of specific antigen-binding activity and can induce undesirable polyreactivity or aggregation [9,10,11]. These detrimental effects are particularly problematic when the isolated antibodies are intended for functional studies or analytical techniques sensitive to structural integrity.
A critical limitation in current methodologies for the microscale isolation of specific antibodies from serum is the universal reliance on acidic buffers for elution, regardless of the sorbent employed. For example, Madara et al. used polyacrylamide gels to isolate antibodies by electrophoretically separating proteins, immobilizing them in situ with glutaraldehyde, and using the homogenized gel as a microsorbent [19]. Another approach purified serum autoantibodies using antigen-bound nitrocellulose membranes excised after Western blotting [5]. Brown et al. developed a high-throughput microscale method to purify antigen-specific antibodies for IgG glycan analysis, utilizing streptavidin-functionalized agarose cartridges conjugated with biotinylated antigens [20]. Similarly, Mendis et al. isolated specific autoantibodies from serum using MBP-fusion protein-coated plates [6]. Although these techniques demonstrate versatility in sorbent design, they share a fundamental drawback: the mandatory use of low-pH elution buffers, which can irreversibly compromise antibody structure and specificity.
To overcome the limitations of conventional elution, we developed a gentle method using anionic detergents to dissociate antibodies from micro-immunosorbents, such as microarrays or magnetic particles. The core of this technique lies in the transient, non-denaturing interaction of the detergent, which, after a subsequent purification via gel filtration, allows for the recovery of antibodies with high purity and minimal loss of native conformation.
Detergents are amphiphilic molecules consisting of a long-chain hydrophobic aliphatic tail and a hydrophilic polar head group. This structure enables their hydrophobic moieties to penetrate and disrupt phospholipid bilayers by displacing membrane lipids, making them highly effective for cell lysis [21]. Beyond membrane disruption, certain detergents have proven remarkably successful in extracting and refolding recombinant proteins from inclusion bodies. A seminal study by Arakawa et al. demonstrated that SLG could recover up to 100% of native protein, in stark contrast to SDS, which yielded 0% recovery after solubilization [12]. Inspired by the protein-refolding capabilities of these mild anionic detergents, we investigated their potential as gentle eluents for isolating specific antibodies from human serum.
The anionic detergents evaluated in this study exhibit distinct structural characteristics that govern their interactions with protein structures during antibody elution. While SDS acts as a strong denaturant that typically causes irreversible protein unfolding, both Sarcosyl and SLG function as milder alternatives capable of solubilizing proteins while maintaining their native conformation and biological activity (Table 1). This fundamental difference in protein-detergent interaction mechanisms directly influences their suitability for antibody isolation applications where preserving structural integrity is paramount.
Analysis of antibody recovery as a function of detergent concentration revealed a distinct optimum for each agent, with efficiency declining at both lower and higher concentrations (Figure 4a). At low concentrations, detergent levels remain below the critical micelle concentration (CMC), preventing effective disruption of the antibody-antigen complex and subsequent antibody release. In contrast, a sharp decline in functional yield observed at concentrations substantially above the CMC is likely attributable to protein denaturation, aggregation, and persistent detergent binding that hinders subsequent purification. Following the identification of these optimal concentrations (0.025% SDS, 1% Sarkosyl, 2% SLG), elution time and temperature were further refined (Figure 4b). The final recovery of functional antibodies under optimized conditions starkly highlighted the difference in detergent gentleness: SDS yielded only 17%, Sarkosyl 45%, and SLG achieved the highest recovery at 78% (Figure 4c).
The robustness of the method against matrix interference was confirmed by spiking experiments in blood serum. Neither the elution efficiency nor the specific activity of the recovered antibodies was compromised by the serum components, confirming the method’s applicability to complex biological samples (Figure 4d).
The isolation of specific antibodies from human serum using microarrays confirmed high functional recovery, with 58.5-85.3% of specific bioactivity retained. Comparative analysis between initial serum samples and isolated antibody fractions was performed using a multi-antigen microarray containing numerous immobilized proteins, including CMV pp150 and Tg (Figure 2). The results demonstrate that the developed method yields sufficient antibody quantities for downstream applications while maintaining structural integrity and antigen-binding capacity (Figure 5). Specific positive signals from microarray elements containing corresponding antigens confirm successful complex formation for both the original serum sample (Figure 5a) and isolated antibody fractions (Figure 5 b-d), verifying preserved bioactivity in the purified eluates. Crucially, the absence of cross-reactivity with non-cognate antigens on the microarray indicates that the SLG-based elution process does not induce polyreactivity in the isolated antibodies.
Despite the limited binding capacity of individual microarray gel elements, the platform offers several compelling advantages. Its primary strength lies in exceptional economic efficiency: the system requires only 6 µg of antigen protein to analyze up to 1,000 serum samples, enabling antibody isolation even against rare or expensive targets. Furthermore, antigen immobilization within a polyacrylamide hydrogel matrix stabilizes the protein’s tertiary structure, preserving epitopes in a native conformation for at least one year[22]. For applications demanding higher antibody yields, such as subsequent ELISA, the platform can be scaled by fabricating capture microarrays with increased numbers or larger dimensions of gel elements. In summary, this approach represents an inexpensive, rapid, and versatile platform for parallel isolation and analysis of specific antibodies from multiple samples.
The mild-elution-based antibody isolation method was successfully adapted also to a magnetic particle platform to demonstrate its versatility. Figure 6 presents the analysis of the isolated serum antibodies against CMV, Tg, and BSA captured with magnetic beads and 2% SLG elution. While the original sample contained antibodies against all three antigens (Figure 6a), each isolated fraction demonstrated high specificity: anti-CMV (Figure 6c), anti-Tg (Figure 6d), and anti-BSA antibodies (Figure 6e). The multiple interactions observed for anti-BSA antibodies (Figure 6f) are attributed to assay interference, as BSA is commonly used as a stabilizer in commercial protein preparations [15]. This was confirmed by direct analysis with fluorescently labeled anti-BSA antibodies (Figure 6f). The specificity of the detecting antibodies used was also validated in a separate control (Figure 6b). Multiplex analysis confirmed the highly selective extraction of target antibodies, with the isolated antibodies retaining functionality and showing no cross-reactivity against unrelated array antigens. These results demonstrate the reversible nature of the SLG-antibody interaction and underscore the method’s high selectivity.
The method’s specificity was demonstrated using a complex serum sample containing multiple distinct antibodies, including anti-CMV (viral), anti-BSA (dietary), anti-Tg (autoimmune) targets (Figure 5 and Figure 6). This successful parallel isolation confirms the platform’s capability for comparative studies of antibody populations across different categories—enabling direct investigation of interaction specificity between autoantibodies, pathogen-specific, and food-specific antibodies within the same experimental framework.
The mild anionic detergent elution method was further validated for isolating total IgG from human serum using Protein G-conjugated magnetic beads. A direct comparison was made between standard acidic elution (Gly-HCl, pH 2.5) and mild elution with 2% SLG. Western blot analysis confirmed successful IgG isolation with both methods (Figure 7a), while silver-stained gels demonstrated comparable purity with minimal co-elution of serum proteins such as albumin (Figure 7b). The consistent band patterns and high purity across multiple serum samples establish SLG elution as a robust alternative to conventional acidic conditions.
Consequently, this strategy enables the selective isolation of target antibodies through mild anionic detergents and versatile immunosorbents, yielding high-purity preparations with preserved structural integrity.

5. Conclusions

This study introduces a novel methodology for the microscale isolation of specific antibodies from human serum. The approach combines antigen-functionalized hydrogel arrays or magnetic beads as micro-immunosorbents with a gentle elution strategy using anionic detergents to dissociate antigen-antibody complexes while preserving antibody function. The presented method enables the highly selective isolation of serum antibodies, including autoantibodies, virus-specific antibodies and antibodies to a food protein, yielding preparations with minimal impurities, undetectable cross-reactivity in multiplex assays, and full retention of structural and functional integrity. This robust platform facilitates the recovery of bioactive antibodies for various downstream analytical and diagnostic applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org, Table S1: Protein Panel for the Multi-Antigen Array.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S.; methodology and validation, D.T.; microarray manufacturing, M.F.; subjects sample collection, A.T.; resources, D.G.; data curation, E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, E.S.; writing—review and editing, D.G.; visualization, E.S.; project administration, E.T. and D.G.; funding acquisition, D.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation to the EIMB Center for Precision Genetic Technologies for Medicine, agreement number 075-15-2025-519.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local ethics committee of the Endocrinology Research Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia (protocol .14 and date of approval 29 July 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for the publication of this article.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or its Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used DeepSeek-V3.2 for the purposes of grammar and language improvement. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
Ab Antibody
Ag Antigen
BSA Bovine serum albumin
CMV Сytomegalovirus
Ig Immunoglobulin
INS Insulin
Sarcosyl Sodium lauryl sarcosinate
SDS Sodium dodecyl sulfate
SDS-PAGE Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
SLG Sodium lauroyl glutamate
Tg Thyroglobulin

References

  1. Krištić, J.; Lauc, G. The importance of IgG glycosylation-What did we learn after analyzing over 100,000 individuals. Immunol. Rev. 2024, 328, 143–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gudelj, I.; Lauc, G.; Pezer, M. Immunoglobulin G glycosylation in aging and diseases. Cell. Immunol. 2018, 333, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mouquet, H.; Nussenzweig, M.C. Polyreactive antibodies in adaptive immune responses to viruses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69, 1435–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rojas, M.; Restrepo-jiménez, P.; Monsalve, D.M.; Pacheco, Y.; Acosta-ampudia, Y.; Ramírez-santana, C.; Leung, P.S.C.; Ansari, A.A.; Gershwin, M.E.; Anaya, J. Molecular mimicry and autoimmunity. J. Autoimmun. 2018, 95, 100–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kurien, B.T. Membrane Strip Affinity Purification of Autoantibodies. Methods Mol Biol. 2015, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mendis, T.; Filipova, B.; Wang, J.J.; Pietropaolo, M.; Jackson, M.W. Affinity purification of serum-derived anti-IA-2 autoantibodies in type 1 diabetes using a novel MBP-IA-2 fusion protein. Biochem. Biophys. Reports 2023, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Safarik, I.; Safarikova, M. Magnetic techniques for the isolation and purification of proteins and peptides. Biomagn. Res. Technol. 2004, 2, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arakawa, T.; Philo, J.S.; Tsumoto, K.; Yumioka, R.; Ejima, D. Elution of antibodies from a Protein-A column by aqueous arginine solutions. Protein Expr. Purif. 2004, 36, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. McMahon, M.J.; O’Kennedy, R. Polyreactivity as an acquired artefact, rather than a physiologic property, of antibodies: evidence that monoreactive antibodies may gain the ability to bind to multiple antigens after exposure to low pH. J. Immunol. Methods 2000, 241, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Djoumerska-Alexieva, I.K.; Dimitrov, J.D.; Nacheva, J.; Kaveri, S. V.; Vassilev, T.L. Protein destabilizing agents induce polyreactivity and enhanced immunomodulatory activity in IVIg preparations. Autoimmunity 2009, 42, 365–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Arakawa, T.; Akuta, T. Mechanistic Insight into Poly-Reactivity of Immune Antibodies upon Acid Denaturation or Arginine Mutation in Antigen-Binding Regions. Antibodies 2023, 12, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Arakawa, T.; Niikura, T.; Kita, Y.; Akuta, T. Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Analogs as a Potential Molecular Biology Reagent. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 621–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schlager, B.; Straessle, A.; Hafen, E. Use of anionic denaturing detergents to purify insoluble proteins after overexpression. BMC Biotechnol. 2012, 12, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chisnall, B.; Johnson, C.; Kulaberoglu, Y.; Chen, Y.W. Insoluble Protein Purification with Sarkosyl: Facts and Precautions. Methods Mol Biol. 2014, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Savvateeva, E.; Yukina, M.; Nuralieva, N.; Bykova, S.; Abramov, I.; Polyakova, V.; Bodunova, N.; Donnikov, M.; Kovalenko, L.; Mazurenko, E.; et al. IgA Antibodies to Bovine Serum Albumin in Adult Patients with Celiac Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 4988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Savvateeva, E.N.; Yukina, M.Y.; Nuralieva, N.F.; Filippova, M.A.; Gryadunov, D.A.; Troshina, E.A. Multiplex Autoantibody Detection in Patients with Autoimmune Polyglandular Syndromes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lysov, Y.; Barsky, V.; Urasov, D.; Urasov, R.; Cherepanov, A.; Mamaev, D.; Yegorov, Y.; Chudinov, A.; Surzhikov, S.; Rubina, A.; et al. Microarray analyzer based on wide field fluorescent microscopy with laser illumination and a device for speckle suppression. Biomed. Opt. Express 2017, 8, 4798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Firer, M. Efficient elution of functional proteins in affinity chromatography. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2001, 49, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Madara, P.J.; Banghart, L.R.; Jack, L.J.W.; Neira, L.M.; Mather, I.H. Affinity purification of polyclonal antibodies from antigen immobilized in situ in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 1990, 187, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Brown, E.P.; Normandin, E.; Osei-Owusu, N.Y.; Mahan, A.E.; Chan, Y.N.; Lai, J.I.; Vaccari, M.; Rao, M.; Franchini, G.; Alter, G.; et al. Microscale purification of antigen-specific antibodies. J. Immunol. Methods 2015, 425, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shehadul Islam, M.; Aryasomayajula, A.; Selvaganapathy, P. A Review on Macroscale and Microscale Cell Lysis Methods. Micromachines 2017, 8, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gryadunov, D.A.; Shaskolskiy, B.L.; Nasedkina, T. V.; Rubina, A.Y.; Zasedatelev, A.S. The EIMB Hydrogel Microarray Technology: Thirty Years Later. Acta Naturae 2018, 10, 4–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chen, Y.Q.; Pottanat, T.G.; Carter, Q.L.; Troutt, J.S.; Konrad, R.J.; Sloan, J.H. Affinity capture elution bridging assay: A novel immunoassay format for detection of anti-therapeutic protein antibodies. J. Immunol. Methods 2016, 431, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Capture array layout. Abbreviations: Ag – immobilized antigen, PBS – Empty gel elements without any protein.
Figure 1. Capture array layout. Abbreviations: Ag – immobilized antigen, PBS – Empty gel elements without any protein.
Preprints 185488 g001
Figure 2. Multi-antigen array layout. The microarray consisted of 120 elements, including six control elements with human immunoglobulins A, G, and M (IgA, IgG, IgM), four empty hydrogel elements without immobilized proteins (PBS), and four elements with a fluorescent marker (M).The catalogue number and the source for each of the immobilized proteins are listed in Table S1. Abbreviations: IgA - Immunoglobulin A, IgG - Immunoglobulin G, IgM - Immunoglobulin M, HSA - Human serum albumin, BSA - Bovine serum albumin, PoSA - Albumin from porcine serum, PBS - Empty gel, IFNa1 - Interferon alpha, INFa2a - Interferon alpha 2a, IFNω - Interferon omega, IL-22 - Interleukin 22, TNFα - Tumor necrosis factor alpha, TNF-β - Tumor necrosis factor beta, FGF2 - Fibroblast growth factor 2, IL-2 - Interleukin 2, IL-4 - Interleukin 4, IL-6 - Interleukin 6, , IL-15 - Interleukin 15, IL-18 - Interleukin 18, IL-21 - Interleukin 21, RF - Fc fragment from papain--digested human IgG (heavy chain dimer), PAD4 - Peptidylarginine Deiminase 4, Ca-Fib - Carbamylated Human Fibrinogen, MCV - Citrullinated Vimentin, dsDNA - Double stranded DNA, CD126 - sIL-6 Receptor α, CRP – C-reactive protein, LBP - Lipopolysaccharide binding protein, SAA - Serum amyloid A1, 21-ОН - Cytochrome P450c21, Р450scc - Cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme, СaSR - Сa-sensing receptor, GAD-65 - Glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 kDa, INS - Insulin human, CD220 - Insulin receptor, TSPAN7 - Tetraspanin-7, ICA - Islet cell autoantigen 1, IA-2 - Tyrosine phosphatase like autoantigen, TPO - Thyroid peroxidase, Tg – Thyroglobulin, TGM2 - Tissue transglutaminase 2, GIF - Gastric Intrinsic Factor, ATP4A - Alpha subunit of the parietal cell H+/K+-ATPase, ATP4B - Beta subunit of the parietal cell H+/K+-ATPase, DCT - Dopachrome delta-isomerase, KRT16 - Keratin 16, TCHH – Trichohyalin, CMV Ag - Cytomegalovirus pp150 protein.
Figure 2. Multi-antigen array layout. The microarray consisted of 120 elements, including six control elements with human immunoglobulins A, G, and M (IgA, IgG, IgM), four empty hydrogel elements without immobilized proteins (PBS), and four elements with a fluorescent marker (M).The catalogue number and the source for each of the immobilized proteins are listed in Table S1. Abbreviations: IgA - Immunoglobulin A, IgG - Immunoglobulin G, IgM - Immunoglobulin M, HSA - Human serum albumin, BSA - Bovine serum albumin, PoSA - Albumin from porcine serum, PBS - Empty gel, IFNa1 - Interferon alpha, INFa2a - Interferon alpha 2a, IFNω - Interferon omega, IL-22 - Interleukin 22, TNFα - Tumor necrosis factor alpha, TNF-β - Tumor necrosis factor beta, FGF2 - Fibroblast growth factor 2, IL-2 - Interleukin 2, IL-4 - Interleukin 4, IL-6 - Interleukin 6, , IL-15 - Interleukin 15, IL-18 - Interleukin 18, IL-21 - Interleukin 21, RF - Fc fragment from papain--digested human IgG (heavy chain dimer), PAD4 - Peptidylarginine Deiminase 4, Ca-Fib - Carbamylated Human Fibrinogen, MCV - Citrullinated Vimentin, dsDNA - Double stranded DNA, CD126 - sIL-6 Receptor α, CRP – C-reactive protein, LBP - Lipopolysaccharide binding protein, SAA - Serum amyloid A1, 21-ОН - Cytochrome P450c21, Р450scc - Cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme, СaSR - Сa-sensing receptor, GAD-65 - Glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 kDa, INS - Insulin human, CD220 - Insulin receptor, TSPAN7 - Tetraspanin-7, ICA - Islet cell autoantigen 1, IA-2 - Tyrosine phosphatase like autoantigen, TPO - Thyroid peroxidase, Tg – Thyroglobulin, TGM2 - Tissue transglutaminase 2, GIF - Gastric Intrinsic Factor, ATP4A - Alpha subunit of the parietal cell H+/K+-ATPase, ATP4B - Beta subunit of the parietal cell H+/K+-ATPase, DCT - Dopachrome delta-isomerase, KRT16 - Keratin 16, TCHH – Trichohyalin, CMV Ag - Cytomegalovirus pp150 protein.
Preprints 185488 g002
Figure 3. Workflow for the microscale isolation of antigen-specific antibodies from human serum. The diagram illustrates the three-stage process using micro-immunosorbents (microarrays or magnetic beads) and anionic detergent elution. The stages are: (1) Capture of specific antibodies (s-Ab) from serum onto the immobilized antigen; (2) Gentle elution using sodium lauroyl glutamate (SLG) to dissociate the complexes; (3) Purification via gel filtration to remove the detergent and recover functional antibodies; (4) Analysis of isolated antibodies.
Figure 3. Workflow for the microscale isolation of antigen-specific antibodies from human serum. The diagram illustrates the three-stage process using micro-immunosorbents (microarrays or magnetic beads) and anionic detergent elution. The stages are: (1) Capture of specific antibodies (s-Ab) from serum onto the immobilized antigen; (2) Gentle elution using sodium lauroyl glutamate (SLG) to dissociate the complexes; (3) Purification via gel filtration to remove the detergent and recover functional antibodies; (4) Analysis of isolated antibodies.
Preprints 185488 g003
Figure 4. Evaluation of anionic detergents as eluents for antibody isolation. (a) Antibody recovery efficiency as a function of SLG concentration; (b) Comparison of the maximum elution efficiency achieved by optimal concentrations of SDS, Sarcosyl, and SLG; (c) Effect of eluent exposure time on elution efficiency ; (d) Assessment of the matrix effect during antibody isolation from serum using a capture microarray. Schematic illustrates the experimental workflow: initial antibody capture from serum (“Capture”), elution with 2% SLG (“Elution”), and re-binding of the purified antibodies (“Re-capture”). Fluorescence images correspond to each step. Note: unless otherwise specified, a 2% aqueous SLG solution was used as the eluent in panels a, c, and d.
Figure 4. Evaluation of anionic detergents as eluents for antibody isolation. (a) Antibody recovery efficiency as a function of SLG concentration; (b) Comparison of the maximum elution efficiency achieved by optimal concentrations of SDS, Sarcosyl, and SLG; (c) Effect of eluent exposure time on elution efficiency ; (d) Assessment of the matrix effect during antibody isolation from serum using a capture microarray. Schematic illustrates the experimental workflow: initial antibody capture from serum (“Capture”), elution with 2% SLG (“Elution”), and re-binding of the purified antibodies (“Re-capture”). Fluorescence images correspond to each step. Note: unless otherwise specified, a 2% aqueous SLG solution was used as the eluent in panels a, c, and d.
Preprints 185488 g004
Figure 5. Multi-antigen microarray analysis of original serum and affinity-isolated antibodies. Fluorescence signals obtained from: (a) the original serum sample; and antibodies specifically eluted from capture microarrays functionalized with (b) thyroglobulin (Tg) and (c) cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigens. Legend: green rectangle - binding of the goat anti-human IgG detection antibody to control elements containing human IgG; red rectangle - antibody binding to elements containing CMV; purple rectangle - antibody binding to elements containing Tg.
Figure 5. Multi-antigen microarray analysis of original serum and affinity-isolated antibodies. Fluorescence signals obtained from: (a) the original serum sample; and antibodies specifically eluted from capture microarrays functionalized with (b) thyroglobulin (Tg) and (c) cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigens. Legend: green rectangle - binding of the goat anti-human IgG detection antibody to control elements containing human IgG; red rectangle - antibody binding to elements containing CMV; purple rectangle - antibody binding to elements containing Tg.
Preprints 185488 g005
Figure 6. Isolation of antigen-specific antibodies using magnetic beads and 2% SLG elution. Analysis of antibody specificity was performed on a multi-antigen microarray. (a) Fluorescence profile of the original serum sample. (c-e) Profiles of antibodies isolated via 2% SLG elution from magnetic beads functionalized with: (c) cytomegalovirus (CMV), (d) thyroglobulin (Tg), and (e) bovine serum albumin (BSA) antigens. Control experiments include: (b) direct application of fluorescently-labeled goat anti-human IgG detection antibody; (f) application of fluorescently-labeled anti-BSA antibodies to assess assay interference. Legend: green rectangle - binding of the goat anti-human IgG detection antibody to control elements containing human IgG; red rectangle - antibody binding to elements containing CMV; purple rectangle - antibody binding to elements containing Tg; blue rectangle - antibody binding to elements containing BSA; blue dashed oval - antibody binding to elements containing BSA used as a carrier protein.
Figure 6. Isolation of antigen-specific antibodies using magnetic beads and 2% SLG elution. Analysis of antibody specificity was performed on a multi-antigen microarray. (a) Fluorescence profile of the original serum sample. (c-e) Profiles of antibodies isolated via 2% SLG elution from magnetic beads functionalized with: (c) cytomegalovirus (CMV), (d) thyroglobulin (Tg), and (e) bovine serum albumin (BSA) antigens. Control experiments include: (b) direct application of fluorescently-labeled goat anti-human IgG detection antibody; (f) application of fluorescently-labeled anti-BSA antibodies to assess assay interference. Legend: green rectangle - binding of the goat anti-human IgG detection antibody to control elements containing human IgG; red rectangle - antibody binding to elements containing CMV; purple rectangle - antibody binding to elements containing Tg; blue rectangle - antibody binding to elements containing BSA; blue dashed oval - antibody binding to elements containing BSA used as a carrier protein.
Preprints 185488 g006
Figure 7. Comparative analysis of total IgG isolated by acidic and SLG elution from Protein G magnetic beads from serum samples. (a) Immunoblot analysis under acidic (Lane #1) and 2% SLG elution (Lane #2) conditions. (b) Total protein profile visualized by silver nitrate staining. Lanes: (M) molecular weight markers (values in kDa); (1) sample #1, SLG elution; (2) sample #1, Gly-HCl buffer (pH 2.5) elution; (3) human serum albumin reference; (4) sample #2, SLG elution; (5) sample #3, SLG elution; (6) sample #4, SLG elution.
Figure 7. Comparative analysis of total IgG isolated by acidic and SLG elution from Protein G magnetic beads from serum samples. (a) Immunoblot analysis under acidic (Lane #1) and 2% SLG elution (Lane #2) conditions. (b) Total protein profile visualized by silver nitrate staining. Lanes: (M) molecular weight markers (values in kDa); (1) sample #1, SLG elution; (2) sample #1, Gly-HCl buffer (pH 2.5) elution; (3) human serum albumin reference; (4) sample #2, SLG elution; (5) sample #3, SLG elution; (6) sample #4, SLG elution.
Preprints 185488 g007
Table 1. Comparison of anionic detergent properties.
Table 1. Comparison of anionic detergent properties.
SDS (Strong Denaturant) Sarcosyl (Mild) SLG (Mild)
Chemical structure CH₃-(CH₂)₁₁-
-O-SO₃⁻ Na⁺
CH₃-(CH₂)₁₀-
-C(O)-N(CH₃)-CH₂-COO⁻ Na⁺
CH₃-(CH₂)₁₀-
-C(O)-NH-CH(COO⁻)-(CH₂)₂-COO⁻ Na⁺
Alkyl tail length Longest Shorter Shorter
Head group polarity Least polar More polar Most polar
Interaction with
proteins
Strong, Aggressive Weaker, Gentle Weakest, Gentle
Effect on protein structure Irreversible denaturation Preserves native structure Preserves native structure
Known use Complete unfolding
SDS-PAGE, Western blot stripping
Gentle solubilization
Inclusion bodies protein extraction
Gentle solubilization
Inclusion bodies protein extraction
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated