Submitted:
11 November 2025
Posted:
12 November 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Geographical Location and Geological Characteristics
2.1. Geographical Location and Geomorphology
2.2. Geological Knowledge
3. Past and Background of Mass Movements in the Area
4. Methodology and Field Data Acquisition
4.1. Geological Field Data Acquisition Methodology
4.2. Social Knowledge and Methodology in the Analysis of Mass Movements
- a.
- Temporal and spatial characterization of the hamlets. Composed of an analysis of the history and development of the communities, economic activities, migration processes, and population growth, and finally, the identification of milestones that modified the social and territorial dynamics.
- b.
- Characterization of mass movements. This involved analyzing the location and names of drainage systems (ravines) according to local memory, describing land uses on hillsides (agriculture, grazing), and the relationship between the intensity and duration of rainfall and the occurrence of events.
- c.
- Analysis of precipitation and the event of June 16, 2024. This included comparing recorded rainfall with previous years, identifying and describing the mass movements documented by the community, and recognizing natural “premonitory” factors observed by the inhabitants.
- d.
- Reconstruction of the sequence of events of June 2024. Based on the accounts of the chronology of the events, the reported impacts, and the assessment of the perceived magnitude.
- Identifying the characteristics of the hillsides, ravines, and springs through the creation of interactive maps.
- Describing mass movement events, their relationship to rainfall, and their impacts at the community level.
- Documenting historical aspects of the communities, their livelihoods, and social and economic transformations.
- Group creation and development of interactive maps (Figure 8), where geographical features, ravines, and past events were located.
- b. Plenary session for comparison and validation, which allowed for the exchange of information between groups and the prioritization of events and rainfall using a subjective scale of 1 to 5, where 1 represents a minor event and five a major event, such as the one that occurred on June 16, 2024.
- c. Collective construction of a timeline to identify relevant milestones from the formation of the hamlet to the 2024 event.
- First campaign: unstructured interviews with two eyewitnesses (Darwin Recalde and Carlos Freire) of the events of June 15 and 16, 2024, complemented by visits to the impact zone in Quilloturo. This activity enabled the reconstruction of the temporal and spatial sequence of rainfall and landslides, as well as their primary impacts.
- Second campaign: semi-structured interviews and the creation of community maps with three residents of El Placer and three of La Merced, focusing on local history, the affected areas, risk perception, and community strategies in response to the events.
5. Results
5.1. Local Geology and Implications for Mass Movements
5.2. Field Verification and Inventory of Mass Movements
5.3. Field Distribution of Fallen Boulders and Typology
5.4. Complex Landslides Characterization
5.5. Social Perception of the Landslide Process
5.5.1. Community Perception and Classification of Historical Mass Movements and Associated Precipitation
- Level 1: very light rainfall, no flows related to.
- Level 2: light rainfall, related to the 2018 flow.
- Level 3: moderate rainfall linked to the Los Chivos ravine event (2022), of shorter duration and lower intensity, with peaks between 08:00–11:00 and 13:00–14:00.
- Level 4: normal winter rainfall, prolonged from night until midday, typical of June, July, and August.
- Level 5: heavy rain, similar or associated with the Quilloturo event (2024), beginning on June 15 around 8:00 PM and reaching maximum intensity between 2:00 AM and 6:00 AM the following day.
5.5.2. Community-Based Early Warning Indicators for Mass Movements
- Sudden drying of the ravine: in the Los Chivos ravine mudslide (2022), the flow stopped a day before the event, and in the Quilloturo ravine mudslide (2024), the water stopped flowing a few minutes before the mudslide.
- Increased sediment content: the water flows down like a stream, with a greater amount of mud and fine materials.
- Increased stream flow: visibly larger or more turbulent flow.
- Noises or roars in the headwaters: unusual sounds, similar to thunder or rockfalls, recorded days or hours before the event; for example, in Los Chivos (2022), roars were heard a week before, and in Quilloturo (2024) for several minutes before the mudslide.
- Sound of rocks rolling within the stream.
- Persistent rain: moderate-intensity rainfall (levels 2 to 3, according to the local scale) lasting for more than an hour.
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Summary of Institutional Technical Reports on the Quilloturo Landslide, 2024
Appendix B
Origin, Development, and Livelihoods of the Communities of La Merced, El Placer, and Quilloturo
Appendix C
Reconstruction of the Events of June 15 and 16, 2024, Based on Eyewitness Accounts



References
- Lavell, A. Riesgo, desastre y territorio. La necesidad de los enfoques regionales/transnacionales. Anuario Social y Político de América Latina y el Caribe. 2002, 5, p. 9.
- Aristizábal, E.; Martínez, H.; Vélez, J.I. Una Revisión Sobre El Estudio de Movimientos En Masa Detonados Por Lluvias. Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. Ex. Fis. Nat. 2023, 34, 209–227. [CrossRef]
- Kjekstad, O.; Highland, L. Economic and Social Impacts of Landslides. In Landslides – Disaster Risk Reduction; Sassa, K., Canuti, P., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009; pp. 573–587 ISBN 978-3-540-69966-8.
- Sandoval-Díaz, J.; Martínez-Labrín, S. Gestión Comunitaria Del Riesgo de Desastre: Una Propuesta Metodológica-Reflexiva Desde Las Metodologías Participativas. REDER 2021, 5, 75. [CrossRef]
- Rodas Toral, R. Análisis de Susceptibilidad a Deslizamientos Aplicado a Grupos Socioeconómicos Vulnerables, Mediante Máxima Entropía (MaxEnt), En Las Parroquias: Cuenca, Nulti, Paccha, El Valle y Turi, Del Cantón Cuenca. Master Thesis, Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar. Quito, Ecuador, 2025.
- Loor Salazar, V.E.; Paucar Camacho, J.A.; Bravo Rosillo, N.G. Percepción del riesgo de la población ante amenazas de sismo, inundación y deslizamiento del cantón Portoviejo. Revista San gregorio. 2022, p. 18.
- Narváez, L.; Lavell, A.; Pérez Ortega, G. La Gestión Del Riesgo de Desastres: Un Enfoque Basado En Procesos. Comunidad Andina. Secretaría General Editions. Quito, Ecuador, 2009.
- Zevallos Moreno, O. Las amenazas hidrometeorológicas en Quito. In Gestión de riesgos en Quito; Carrión, A., Rebotier, J., Metzger, P., Puente Sotomayor, F., Eds.; IRD Éditions, Flacso Ecuador: Marseille, Marseille, 2024; pp. 70–91 ISBN 978-2-7099-3051-2.
- Wang, Y.; Wu, X.; Lin, G.; Peng, B. Deciphering the Social Vulnerability of Landslides Using the Coefficient of Variation-Kullback-Leibler-TOPSIS at an Administrative Village Scale. Remote Sensing 2025, 17, 714. [CrossRef]
- Varnes, D.J. Slope Movement Types and Processes. In Landslides—Analysis and control: National Research Council, Washington, D.C.; Special Report; Transportation Research Board: Washington, D.C., 1978; Vol. 176, pp. 11–33.
- Cruden, D.M.; Varnes, D.J. Landslide Types and Processes. In Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation; Transportation Research Board; Turner, A.K. and Shuster, R.L., Eds., 1996; Vol. 247, pp. 36–75.
- Carrión, A., Rebotier, J., Metzger, P., Puente-Sotomayor, F. Gestión de Riesgos En Quito. Balance y Perspectivas de Treinta Años de Estudios; 1st ed.; FLACSO Quito. Ecuador / IRD, 2024; ISBN 978-9978-67-690-5.
- D’Ercole, R.; Trujillo, M. Amenazas, Vulnerabilidad, Capacidades y Riesgos En El Ecuador. Los Desastres, Un Reto Para El Desarrollo.; COOPI, IRD y Oxfam.; Quito, 2003; ISBN 9978-42-972-7.
- Saito, S.M.; Dias, M.C.D.A.; Alvalá, R.C.D.S.; Stenner, C.; Franco, C.; Ribeiro, J.V.M.; Souza, P.A.D.; Santana, R.A.S.D.M. População Urbana Exposta Aos Riscos de Deslizamentos, Inundações e Enxurradas No Brasil. SN 2019, 31. [CrossRef]
- Pilatasig, L.; Ibadango, E.; Troncoso, L.; Mateus, A.; Alulema, R.; Alonso Pandavenes, O. Evaluación del deslizamiento Casual Nuevo Alausí y su zona de influencia; FIGEMPA - Universidad Central del Ecuador: Quito, Ecuador, 2023; p. 25;
- Valdés Carrera, A.C.; Mendoza, M.E.; Allende, T.C.; Macías, J.L. A Review of Recent Studies on Landslide Hazard in Latin America. Physical Geography 2023, 44, 243–286. [CrossRef]
- Troncoso, L.; Pilatasig, L.; Ibadango, E.; Mateus, A.; Bermeo, A. Evaluación de Susceptibilidad a Movimientos En Masa de Las Laderas y Taludes Relacionados Con El Sector de La Merced Hasta Quilloturo, y Su Zona de Influencia; Quito, Ecuador, 2024; p. 111;
- Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería Geoportal SigTierra-MAG. Sistema Nacional de Información de Tierras Rurales e Infraestructura Tecnológica 2010.
- Litherland, M.; Aspden, J.A.; Jemielita, R. The Metamorphic Belts of Ecuador; Overseas Memoir; 1a.; British Geological Survey: Keyworth, Nottingham, UK, 1994; Vol. 11; ISBN 0-85272-239-7.
- Mercier, J.; Vergely, P. Tectónica; 1a Edición en español.; Limusa: Mexico DC, 2001;
- Troncoso, L. El Podcast Como Estrategia Para Difundir El Conocimiento Comunitario Sobre Peligros Volcánicos. Master Thesis, Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar: Quito, Ecuador, 2022.
- GADP RioVerde Plan de Desarrollo y Ordenamiento Territorial 2019-2023; Gad Parroquial de Rio Verde: Baños de Tungurahua, 2018; p. 175;
- Secretaría de Gestión de Riesgos Informe de Situación - Época Lluviosa, Ecuador; Secretaría de Gestión de Riesgos: Quito, 2018; p. 15;
- El Telégrafo editorial La Carretera Baños-Puyo Se Abrió Tras 24 Horas Sin Lluvias. El Telegrafo 2018.
- Diarioderio Dos Fallecidos Por Aluvión En RíoVerde. El Diario de Riobamba 2018.
- EcoAmazónico Tristeza y Desconsuelo Por La Muerte de 3 Personas En El Placer. EcoAmazónico comunica y une voces 2022.
- Radio Baños Online Dos Fallecidos Por Aluvión En RíoVerde. Se Realizó Sobrevuelo de Reconocimiento En El Sector de Quilloturo. Radio Baños Online 2022.
- El Telégrafo editorial Cerrada La Vía Baños-Puyo Por Deslizamientos de Tierra. El Telegrafo 2022.
- Hungr, O.; Leroueil, S.; Picarelli, L. The Varnes Classification of Landslide Types, an Update. Landslides 2014, 11, 167–194. [CrossRef]
- LaHusen, S.R.; Grant, A.R.R. Complex Landslide Patterns Explained by Local Intra-Unit Variability of Stratigraphy and Structure: Case Study in the Tyee Formation, Oregon, USA. Engineering Geology 2024, 329, 107387. [CrossRef]
- Riemer, W.; Locher, T.; Núñez, I. Mechanics of Deep Seated Mass Movements in Metamorphic Rocks of the Ecuadorian Andes. In Proceedings of the Proceedings Of The Fifth International Symposium On Landslides; A.A. Balkema, Brookfield, Rotterdam: Laussane, Suiza, 1988; Vol. 1, pp. 307–310.
- Correa Campués, C.J. Análisis de La Susceptibilidad de Los Fenómenos de Remoción En Masa de La Carretera Loja-Zamora. Bachelor degree Thesis, Escuela Politécnica Nacional: Quito, Ecuador, 2007.
- Xiao, Y.; Tang, X.; Li, Y.; Huang, H.; An, B.-W. Social Vulnerability Assessment of Landslide Disaster Based on Improved TOPSIS Method: Case Study of Eleven Small Towns in China. Ecological Indicators 2022, 143, 109316. [CrossRef]
- Cardona, O.D. The Need for Rethinking the Concepts of Vulnerability and Risk from a Holistic Perspective: A Necessary Review and Criticism for Effective Risk Management. In Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People; Routledge: London, UK, 2004; p. 256+ ISBN 978-1-84977-192-4.
- Van Westen, C.J.; Castellanos, E.; Kuriakose, S.L. Spatial Data for Landslide Susceptibility, Hazard, and Vulnerability Assessment: An Overview. Engineering Geology 2008, 102, 112–131. [CrossRef]
- García Acosta, V. El riesgo como construcción social y la construcción social de riesgos. Desacatos. 2005, pp. 11–24.
- Hernandez Cortes, N.L.; Ayala Macías, E. Resistir en el paisaje: voces y gestión de la comunidad ante los deslizamientos e inundaciones en la colonia Sánchez Taboada de Tijuana. DECUMANUS. Revista Interdisciplinaria sobre Estudios Urbanos. 2025, p. 32.
- Zúñiga Armjo, S. La memoria y resiliencia de habitantes de la comuna de Hualqui frente a desbordes del río Biobío. urbearq 2023, 93–110. [CrossRef]
- Pilatasig, L.; Torrijo, F.J.; Ibadango, E.; Troncoso, L.; Alonso-Pandavenes, O.; Mateus, A.; Solano, S.; Viteri, F.; Alulema, R. Casual-Nuevo Alausí Landslide (Ecuador, March 2023): A Case Study on the Influence of the Anthropogenic Factors. GeoHazards 2025, 6, 28. [CrossRef]
- Troncoso, L.; Torrijo, F.J.; Ibadango, E.; Pilatasig, L.; Alonso-Pandavenes, O.; Mateus, A.; Solano, S.; Cañar, R.; Rondal, N.; Viteri, F. Analysis of the Impact Area of the 2022 El Tejado Ravine Mudflow (Quito, Ecuador) from the Sedimentological and the Published Multimedia Documents Approach. GeoHazards 2024, 5, 596–620. [CrossRef]
- Valdés Carrera, A.C.; Mendoza, M.E.; Allende, T.C.; Macías, J.L. A Review of Recent Studies on Landslide Hazard in Latin America. Physical Geography 2023, 44, 243–286. [CrossRef]
- Fernández, M. ¿Cómo superar los retos de la vivienda rural en América Latina y el Caribe? ciudades Sostenibles 2023.
- Secretaría Nacional de Gestión de Riesgos SitRep N.01-Lluvias, 16 de Junio de 2024. Informe De Situación Cantonal Baños De Agua Santa; Monitoreo de Eventos Adversos; Secretaría Nacional de Gestión de Riesgos: Quito, 2024; p. 4;
- Secretaría Nacional de Gestión de Riesgos Informe de Análisis de Los Factores de Riesgo Presentes En Los Sectores El Placer y Quilloturo; Secretaría Nacional de Gestión de Riesgos: Quito, Ecuador, 2024; p. 72;
- Secretaría Nacional de Gestión de Riesgos SitRep N.32-Lluvias, 16 de Junio de 2024. INFORME DE SITUACIÓN CANTONAL BAÑOS DE AGUA SANTA; Monitoreo de Eventos Adversos; Secretaría Nacional de Gestión de Riesgos: Quito, 2024; p. 10;
- IIGE Informe de Asistencia Técnica de Emergencia Para El Levantamiento de Información Geológica, Fotogramétrica e Identificación de Movimientos En Masa En El Cantón Baños de Agua Santa, Provincia de Tungurahua; IIGE Instituto de Investigación Geológico y Energético: Quito, Ecuador, 2024; p. 26;














| Code | Type of slide | Area (m2) | Direction | Inclination (º) | State of activity | Height (m) | Length (m) | Wide (m) | Thickness (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EI-77 | Debris flow | 18816.6 | 150 | 12 | Pendent | 15.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
| EI-17 | Debris flow | 98676.2 | 165 | 12 | Pendent | 15.0 | 25.0 | 3.0 | |
| LP-65 | Debris flow | 5931.7 | 175 | Active | |||||
| LP-12 | Rotational | 2387.7 | 175 | Active | 2.0 | ||||
| EI-24 | Debris flow | 9153.8 | 180 | 50 | Pendent | 1.0 | 2.0 | ||
| LP-60 | Mud flow | 6578.9 | 145 | Active | 35.0 | 15.0 | |||
| EI-31 | Rock and debris flow | 1620.4 | 250 | 35 | Pendent | 1.0 | 2.0 | ||
| EI-30 | Rotational | 79174.3 | 210 | 28 | Pendent | 5.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | |
| EI-34 | Earth and debris flow | 1333.1 | 170 | 45 | Active | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| EI-39 | Debris flow | 1861.5 | 190 | 27 | Pendent | 1.0 | 5.0 | ||
| EI-41 | Translational | 2621.0 | 180 | 35 | Pendent | 5.0 | 3.0 | ||
| EI-37 | Earth and debris flow | 198.9 | 180 | 40 | Active | 3.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| EI-36 | Earth and debris flow | 480.0 | 215 | 50 | Active | 1.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 |
| EI-26 | Earth and debris flow | 24710.4 | 170 | 47 | Pendent | 5.0 | 4.0 | ||
| LP-13A | Avalanche | 620.2 | 235 | 35 | Active | 4.0 | 5.0 | ||
| EI-21 | Earth and debris flow | 416.3 | 235 | 65 | Active | 4.0 | 5.0 | ||
| AM-44 | Rotational | 2156.2 | 190 | Inactive | 3.0 | 9.0 | 15.0 | ||
| AM-42 | Translational | 806.8 | 120 | Active | |||||
| EI-11 | Debris flow | 478.3 | 150 | 35 | Pendent | 1.0 | 8.0 | ||
| AM-41 | Translational | 2741.1 | 150 | Active | |||||
| EI-18 | Earth and debris flow | 9345.7 | 343 | 47 | Pendent | 1.0 | 25.0 | ||
| EI-50 | Earth and debris flow | 3395.0 | 70 | 60 | Pendent | 15.0 | 25.0 | ||
| EI-10 | Earth and debris flow | 1452.6 | 130 | 28 | Active | 5.0 | 2.0 | ||
| EI-20 | Earth and debris flow | 99.3 | 180 | 35 | Pendent | 3.0 | 15.0 | 5.0 | |
| EI-01 | Earth and debris flow | 625.4 | 285 | 48 | Active | 5.0 | 5.0 | ||
| LP-01 | Avalanche | 53.9 | 225 | Active | 1.0 | 8.0 | |||
| EI-54 | Debris flow | 123.1 | 165 | 18 | Pendent | 5.0 | |||
| EI-53 | Earth and debris flow | 8116.6 | 192 | 35 | Pendent | 5.0 | 2.0 | ||
| EI-23 | Debris flow | 365.6 | 220 | 30 | Pendent | 1.0 | |||
| EI-43 | Earth and debris flow | 1654.1 | 188 | 74 | Active | 3.0 | 2.0 | ||
| EI-45 | Debris flow | 17565.6 | 280 | 35 | Pendent | 2.0 | 2.0 | ||
| EI-09 | Old landslide | 2291.0 | 135 | 28 | Inactive | 1.0 | 5.0 | ||
| EI-62 | Translational | 9950.9 | 130 | 35 | Pendent | 3.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | |
| LP-60A | Translational | 3827.2 | 170 | Active | 16.0 | 25.0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
