Submitted:
08 November 2025
Posted:
10 November 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Case Presentation
2.1. Initial History and Failed Intervention
2.2. Clinical and Radiological Evaluation at Our Institution
2.3. Therapeutic Intervention: Catheter Drainage and Sclerotherapy
- Catheter Placement: Under continuous real-time US guidance, a point of entry was selected on the anterior neck medial to the sternocleidomastoid muscle. After local infiltration with 2% lidocaine, a small 2 mm skin incision was made. A modified trocar system containing a soft, 7-French catheter with multiple side holes was advanced percutaneously into the center of the cyst cavity. The selection of a soft, atraumatic catheter over a rigid metal needle was a deliberate technical choice to minimize the risk of traumatizing the delicate and vascular cyst wall during fluid aspiration and subsequent cyst collapse, thereby reducing the likelihood of iatrogenic hemorrhage.
- Aspiration and Lavage: Once the catheter's position within the cyst was confirmed by US, the inner stylet was removed. The catheter was then connected to a 20 mL syringe, and a total of 100 mL of dark fluid was aspirated (Figure 2A). A sample of the fluid was sent for cytological analysis, which subsequently confirmed the presence of benign follicular cells and hemosiderin-laden macrophages, with no evidence of malignancy. Following complete aspiration, the cyst cavity was repeatedly lavaged with sterile saline until the aspirated fluid became clear. This step was deemed crucial for removing hemorrhagic debris and residual proteinaceous material that could potentially dilute the sclerosant and inhibit its efficacy.Following this, ultrasound could clearly observe the side-hole catheter positioned within the residual cavity(Figure 2B); this is safer than a metal needle. This is because a metal needle tip risks accidentally puncturing normal tissue, causing re-bleeding, or its tip may become displaced, preventing re-entry into the cavity and leading to risks associated with the drug injection.
- Sclerotherapy: A sclerosant foam was prepared using the Tessari method by vigorously mixing 4 mL of 3% polidocanol solution with 24 mL of room air between two syringes connected by a three-way stopcock. The resulting microfoam was then slowly injected into the completely collapsed cyst cavity via the indwelling catheter. Real-time US imaging confirmed the uniform distribution of the hyperechoic foam throughout the cavity, ensuring complete and intimate contact with the entire surface area of the secretory epithelial lining (Figure 2C).
- Prolonged Drainage: After the sclerosant injection, the catheter was secured to the skin with a suture and a sterile dressing. The distal end of the catheter was capped and sealed for the initial 24 hours. This dwell time was intended to maximize the contact period between the polidocanol and the cyst wall to ensure complete chemical ablation. After 24 hours, the catheter was connected to a portable negative pressure drainage bottle to facilitate continuous, active drainage of post-procedural fluid (Figure 2D).
2.4. Post-Procedural Course and Follow-Up
3. Discussion
3.1. Analysis of RFA Failure: A Predictable Outcome for a Giant Cyst
3.2. The Mechanistic Superiority of Chemical Sclerotherapy for Cystic Lesions
3.3. The Core Innovation: The Role of Prolonged Catheter Drainage
3.4. A Proposed New Treatment Algorithm
3.5. Limitations
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| PEI | Percutaneous Ethanol Injection |
| RFA | Radiofrequency Ablation |
References
- Yang C, Hsu Y, Liou J. Efficacy of Ethanol Ablation for Benign Thyroid Cysts and Predominantly Cystic Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul), 2021, 36(1):81-95. [CrossRef]
- Choi WJ, Baek JH, Choi YJ, et al. Management of cystic or predominantly cystic thyroid nodules: role of simple aspiration of internal fluid[J]. Endocr Res, 2015, 40(4):215-219. [CrossRef]
- Bennedbaek FN, Hegedüs L. Treatment of recurrent thyroid cysts with ethanol: a randomized double-blind controlled trial[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2003, 88(12):5773-5777. [CrossRef]
- Deandrea M, Trimboli P, Creanza A, et al. Long-term follow-up of cystic thyroid nodules treated with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) using two different approaches[J]. Eur J Endocrinol, 2020, 183(5):489-495. [CrossRef]
- Gong X, Wang F, Du H, et al. Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Polidocanol Injection Versus Percutaneous Ethanol Injection for Treatment of Benign Cystic Thyroid Nodules[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2018, 37(6):1423-1429. [CrossRef]
- Reverter JL, Alonso N, Avila M, et al. Evaluation of efficacy, safety, pain perception and health-related quality of life of percutaneous ethanol injection as first-line treatment in symptomatic thyroid cysts[J]. BMC Endocr Disord, 2015, 15:73. [CrossRef]
- Sung JY, Kim YS, Choi H, et al. Optimum first-line treatment technique for benign cystic thyroid nodules: ethanol ablation or radiofrequency ablation?[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2011, 196(2):W210-214. [CrossRef]
- Sung JY, Baek JH, Kim KS, et al. Single-session treatment of benign cystic thyroid nodules with ethanol versus radiofrequency ablation: a prospective randomized study[J]. Radiology, 2013, 269(1):293-300. [CrossRef]
- Gong X, Zhou Q, Wang F, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Polidocanol Sclerotherapy in Benign Cystic Thyroid Nodules: Preliminary Results[J]. Int J Endocrinol, 2017, 2017:8043429. [CrossRef]
- Zerem E, Imamović G, Omerović S. Percutaneous treatment of symptomatic non-parasitic benign liver cysts: single-session alcohol sclerotherapy versus prolonged catheter drainage with negative pressure[J]. Eur Radiol, 2008, 18(2):400-406. [CrossRef]
- Zerem E, Imamovíc G, Omerovíc S. Symptomatic simple renal cyst: comparison of continuous negative-pressure catheter drainage and single-session alcohol sclerotherapy[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 190(5):1193-1197. [CrossRef]


Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).