Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

No Safe Space: A Systematic Review of Violence Against Women and Girls Across Africa (ANULA-WP1)

Submitted:

05 November 2025

Posted:

07 November 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Introduction Violence against women and girls (VAWG) is a major public health and human rights issue in Africa, with prevalence consistently among the highest globally. According to WHO and UNFPA, one in three women worldwide experience violence in their lifetime, but in sub-Saharan Africa the burden is compounded by poverty, food insecurity, conflict, and weak health systems. Despite its scale, evidence is fragmented across countries and populations, often excluding vulnerable groups such as pregnant women, sex workers, healthcare workers, adolescents, and HIV-positive women. This review synthesises available data to provide a comprehensive understanding of the scope, determinants, outcomes, and interventions addressing VAWG in Africa.Methods We conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, African Journals Online, WHO, UNFPA, and Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) repositories were searched (2000–2024). Eligible studies were conducted in African countries and reported prevalence, determinants, outcomes, or interventions for VAWG, including IPV, sexual violence, workplace violence, reproductive coercion, in-law abuse, or community-based violence. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers, appraised for quality, and synthesised using thematic, contextual, trend, and intersectional analyses.Results Eighty studies from 22 African countries were included. Lifetime IPV ranged from 30–65%, pregnancy IPV 25–60%, childhood sexual abuse ~33%, workplace violence 30–62%, and >50% among sex workers. Determinants included alcohol use, poverty, food insecurity, conflict, and inequitable gender norms. Outcomes included maternal morbidity, depression, adverse birth outcomes, HIV/STI risk, and sexual dysfunction. Interventions such as SASA!, Indashyikirwa, CETA, and MAISHA reduced IPV and improved secondary outcomes.ConclusionVAWG in Africa is pervasive, persistent, and particularly concentrated among marginalised groups. Integrated, trauma-informed, and equity-sensitive responses are urgently required to reduce its health and social consequences.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

Background

Violence against women and girls (VAWG) is recognised globally as one of the most pressing public health and human rights challenges of our time. The United Nations describes VAWG as a “shadow pandemic” that undermines health, development, and gender equality, cutting across cultural, socioeconomic, and political contexts. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that one in three women worldwide have experienced physical and/or sexual violence in their lifetime, predominantly by an intimate partner [1]. The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) further highlights that VAWG has devastating intergenerational impacts, perpetuating cycles of poverty, ill-health, and social exclusion [2].
In Africa, the burden of VAWG is particularly acute. Regional estimates suggest that women and girls in sub-Saharan Africa experience some of the highest prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) globally, with lifetime exposure ranging from 33% to over 60% depending on context [1]. UNFPA and the African Union have underscored that VAWG intersects with broader challenges, including early and forced marriage, female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C), sexual exploitation in humanitarian settings, and economic disempowerment. Conflict and instability exacerbate these risks: according to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA), women in fragile and conflict-affected states face disproportionately high levels of sexual and gender-based violence, often used as a weapon of war [3]. In countries affected by protracted crises—such as the Democratic Republic of Congo, South Sudan, and parts of the Sahel—weak governance and poor infrastructure mean survivors frequently lack access to justice, health care, and psychosocial support.
The public health consequences of VAWG in Africa are profound. WHO has documented links between IPV and maternal morbidity, depression, anxiety, suicide, unintended pregnancy, unsafe abortion, adverse birth outcomes, HIV infection, and chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease [1]. The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) has highlighted the particularly strong associations between VAWG and HIV acquisition, especially in southern Africa where young women remain at the epicentre of the epidemic. Beyond health, VAWG undermines women’s participation in education, employment, and political life, contributing to lost productivity and slowing progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 3 (good health and wellbeing) and SDG 5 (gender equality) [4].
Despite increasing global attention, the African context presents unique structural drivers of violence. Poverty, food insecurity, gender-inequitable norms, polygamy, in-law dynamics, and patriarchal authority systems sustain high tolerance for violence. Weak health and legal infrastructures, combined with chronic underfunding, limit survivor-centred care and protection. In many settings, women’s economic dependency and lack of decision-making autonomy heighten their vulnerability, while limited data systems make it difficult to design targeted interventions. Conflict, displacement, and migration create conditions in which sexual violence, exploitation, and coercion thrive, yet accountability remains limited.
While national surveys such as the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) provide valuable estimates of IPV prevalence, they often focus narrowly on intimate partner dynamics and conceal the lived realities of marginalised populations. Groups such as pregnant women, female sex workers, healthcare workers, adolescents, HIV-positive women, and infertile women are either under-represented or excluded, despite being among those most affected. Furthermore, non-partner violence including workplace harassment, reproductive coercion, in-law abuse, and community-based sexual exploitation remains poorly documented. Evidence on interventions is also fragmented: although programmes such as SASA in Uganda, Indashyikirwa in Rwanda, and MAISHA in Tanzania demonstrate the potential of community mobilisation, couple-based training, and gender-transformative approaches, much of this evidence is concentrated in a few countries, leaving substantial regional gaps[5).
These gaps underscore the rationale for an evidence synthesis focused specifically on Africa. First, the high burden of VAWG in the region, coupled with overlapping crises of conflict, HIV, and poverty, demands a consolidated understanding of how violence manifests across diverse populations and contexts. Second, fragmented evidence prevents policymakers from distinguishing between broad national averages and concentrated vulnerabilities in hidden or high-risk groups. Third, there is an urgent need to integrate epidemiological data with emerging intervention evidence, to guide health systems and policy frameworks towards effective, scalable, and context-sensitive solutions. Finally, synthesising evidence through a multi-layered lens encompassing thematic, contextual, temporal, and intersectional analysis offers a more nuanced understanding of the drivers, consequences, and protective factors shaping VAWG in Africa.
In response, this systematic review collates and critically appraises evidence from 78 studies across 22 African countries published between 2000 and 2024. By adopting four complementary analytic approaches, it provides the most comprehensive account to date of VAWG in Africa. This synthesis is intended to support clinicians, researchers, and policymakers in developing integrated, trauma-informed, and equity-sensitive strategies to reduce violence, strengthen health systems, and accelerate progress towards global commitments on gender equality and women’s health.

Methods

Protocol and Reporting

This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. A review protocol was developed a priori, outlining the research questions, inclusion criteria, and planned analysis strategy.

Research Questions

The review aimed to:
  • Characterise the types of violence committed against women and girls in African countries.
  • Conduct a thematic and contextual synthesis of determinants and outcomes of such violence.
  • Provide a trend analysis across regions and populations over time.

Eligibility Criteria

Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were conducted in African countries and reported on violence against women and girls (VAWG), encompassing intimate partner violence (IPV), sexual violence (SV), workplace violence (WPV), reproductive coercion, in-law abuse, or community-based violence. Eligible studies employed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods designs and were required to report on at least one of the following: prevalence, determinants, outcomes, or interventions related to VAWG. Exclusion criteria comprised editorials, opinion pieces, studies lacking primary data, and research conducted outside the African context.

Information Sources and Search Strategy

Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, African Journals Online (AJOL), and grey literature repositories (WHO, UNFPA, DHS reports). Search terms combined “violence”, “women”, “girls”, “Africa”, and country names, using Boolean operators. The search spanned 2000–2024.

Study Selection

Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Disagreements were resolved by consensus or third-party adjudication. A PRISMA flow diagram documented the selection process.

Data Extraction

A structured form captured: author, year, country, population, setting, sample size, prevalence/type of violence, determinants, outcomes, and contextual notes (e.g., conflict, HIV, infertility, pregnancy, workplace -Table 1)

Risk of Bias Assessment

Quantitative studies were appraised using the AXIS tool for cross-sectional designs, CASP for qualitative studies, and RoB-2 for RCTs (Table 3 & 4).

Data Synthesis

Data from the included studies were synthesised using four complementary analytic approaches. First, a thematic analysis was conducted to categorise the forms of violence reported, their determinants, outcomes, and interventions. Findings were mapped against the WHO ecological model to capture risk and protective factors at the individual, relationship, community, and societal levels, ensuring comparability across heterogeneous study designs. Second, a contextual analysis was undertaken to situate evidence within specific population subgroups pregnant women, female sex workers, healthcare workers, adolescents, HIV-positive populations, infertile women, and women sampled through Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and across different African countries and regions. This enabled identification of population- and setting-specific vulnerabilities and protective factors. Third, a trend analysis was performed to assess temporal changes in prevalence and patterns of intimate partner violence (IPV) and other forms of violence against women and girls (VAWG). This drew on repeated DHS surveys, WHO multi-country data, and other longitudinal or nationally representative datasets to illustrate stability or shifts in prevalence across time and regions. Finally, an equity-focused intersectional analysis was applied to examine how overlapping structural inequalities including poverty, educational attainment, disability, HIV status, infertility, occupational role, pregnancy, and conflict exposure—intersect to exacerbate risk. This approach highlighted vulnerability clusters, demonstrated how compounded disadvantages amplify both exposure to and consequences of violence, and identified groups most likely to be left behind by universal interventions. Together, these four analytic layers provided a comprehensive synthesis that integrated thematic insights, contextual nuance, temporal patterns, and equity dimensions to inform policy and practice.

Results

Study Characteristics

A total of 78 studies conducted between 2000 and 2024 across 22 African countries were included, encompassing a mix of cross-sectional surveys (n=53), Demographic and Health Survey (DHS)-based analyses (n=9), randomised controlled trials (RCTs; n=7), longitudinal cohorts (n=5), and qualitative or mixed-methods studies (n=4). Sample sizes ranged from small clinic-based investigations of fewer than 200 participants to nationally representative DHS surveys exceeding 5,000 women. Populations studied included pregnant women (n=24), adolescents and young women (n=9), healthcare workers (n=7), female sex workers (n=6), HIV-positive individuals (n=9), infertile women (n=3), and community-based general female samples (n=20). Studies spanned diverse contexts including conflict-affected settings (e.g., Côte d’Ivoire, Uganda), HIV-prevalent communities (e.g., South Africa, Zambia, Ethiopia), and health service environments (e.g., Ethiopia, Rwanda, Gambia) (Lyons et al.,2018). Methodological quality varied, with most studies reporting validated IPV measures (e.g., WHO multi-country instrument, DHS modules), though recall bias, under-reporting, and facility-based sampling limited generalisability in some contexts.

Thematic Analysis

The thematic synthesis identified four dominant themes: forms of violence, determinants and risk factors, health and social outcomes, and protective factors and interventions (Table 2). Violence was consistently multi-faceted, spanning physical, sexual, psychological, economic, controlling behaviours, in-law violence, reproductive coercion, childhood sexual abuse, and workplace harassment. Determinants clustered at the individual (alcohol use, age, education, HIV status, infertility, disability), relationship (partner control, polygamy, marital status, in-law dynamics), community (poverty, displacement, adolescent marriage, workplace conditions), and societal (gender-inequitable norms, conflict, patriarchal backlash) levels.

Contextual Analysis

Contextual patterns were striking across subgroups. Pregnant women reported IPV prevalence exceeding 50% in Ethiopia, predominantly driven by partner alcohol use and women’s economic dependency[77, 78]. Female sex workers in Rwanda and Kenya faced pervasive violence (>50%) from clients and brothel managers, often linked to HIV/STI risk. Healthcare workers in Rwanda, Ethiopia, and Gambia experienced 30–62% workplace violence, with nurses and midwives at highest risk due to frontline exposure and understaffing[79, 80]. Adolescents in South Africa reported escalating IPV with age, with prevalence rising from 11% at 13–14 years to 32% at 17–20 years[80]. HIV-positive women and youth in Ethiopia and Zambia experienced the highest reported burdens, with 60–78% multi-type violence, underscoring syndemic interactions between HIV and violence. Infertile women in Nigeria and Egypt experienced IPV and in-law abuse rooted in reproductive stigma. In contrast, DHS-based national estimates in Nigeria, Ghana, and Kenya were lower (23–35%) but concealed subgroup vulnerabilities.

Trend Analysis

Temporal evidence from repeated DHS surveys and WHO multi-country studies showed persistent high prevalence of IPV across two decades, with no evidence of sustained declines. In Tanzania, physical IPV in pregnancy was ~7–12% in 2001–02 WHO surveys, yet multi-form IPV was ~48% in the 2015 DHS[81]. In Uganda, past-year IPV remained stable at ~30%, but reached >60% in conflict-affected districts. In Ethiopia, Oromia reported pregnancy IPV as high as 65%, contrasting with ~32% in Addis Ababa[9]. DHS data from Nigeria and Ghana remained stable (23–35%) between 2003 and 2018, while South Africa showed IPV prevalence consistently around 40% with syndemic clustering of HIV, poverty, and depression. Figure 1 is a multi-country trend figure (2000–2020) showing IPV prevalence from repeated DHS/WHO studies in Tanzania, Uganda, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Ghana, South Africa.

Intersectional Analysis

An intersectional lens highlighted how overlapping disadvantages exacerbate risk. HIV-positive women and youth were among the most vulnerable, with IPV prevalence >60%, amplifying poor ART adherence and HIV transmission risks. Pregnant women living in poverty experienced intensified IPV, with food insecurity (AOR 6.59 in Ethiopia) emerging as one of the strongest predictors. Adolescents experiencing school dropout or early marriage faced escalating IPV, particularly in South Africa and Eswatini[82]. Healthcare workers, particularly nurses and midwives, bore a dual burden of workplace and domestic violence, with violence concentrated in under-resourced settings[83]. Conflict exposure increased IPV and in-law abuse in Côte d’Ivoire and Uganda, with odds ratios of 1.7–2.0 for women from conflict-affected households. Importantly, in DHS analyses, women with greater decision-making autonomy sometimes reported higher IPV risk, reflecting patriarchal backlash in transitional empowerment contexts[31].

Discussion

This systematic review provides comprehensive evidence that violence against women and girls (VAWG) in Africa is pervasive, multi-dimensional, and deeply rooted in structural inequalities. Across 80 studies from 22 countries, we found that lifetime intimate partner violence (IPV) affects between one-third and two-thirds of women, with particularly high prevalence among pregnant women, HIV-positive populations, female sex workers, and healthcare workers[83]. Violence was not limited to the home: in-law abuse, reproductive coercion, childhood sexual violence, and workplace harassment were also prominent. Determinants clustered across the WHO ecological model, including alcohol use, poverty, food insecurity, gender-inequitable norms, and conflict exposure. Importantly, interventions such as SASA!, Indashyikirwa, CETA, and MAISHA demonstrated that well-designed, gender-transformative or trauma-focused programmes can reduce violence and deliver co-benefits in mental health, child wellbeing, and economic security[70]. Collectively, these findings highlight that VAWG is not only an endemic social issue but also a public health emergency demanding systemic, multi-sectoral responses.
The implications of these findings are profound. Population-level surveys such as DHS tend to report prevalence between 23% and 35%, but subgroup analyses reveal much higher burdens in marginalised groups, aligning with literature from South Asia and Latin America where structural vulnerability predicts concentrated violence exposure. Our synthesis shows that pregnant women, HIV-positive individuals, adolescents, infertile women, sex workers, and healthcare workers all experience overlapping risks that are seldom captured in national averages. This divergence illustrates a major gap in existing research: current epidemiological monitoring frameworks under-report hidden, high-risk populations and under-measure non-partner violence such as workplace harassment and in-law abuse. Furthermore, while a small but growing number of intervention trials in Africa demonstrate reductions in IPV, these remain concentrated in a few countries (Uganda, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania), with little coverage elsewhere. There is limited longitudinal evidence on how violence trajectories evolve across the life course, and insufficient integration of equity-focused analyses in existing reviews.
Clinically, the findings underscore the urgent need for trauma-informed, integrated care pathways. IPV was consistently linked to maternal morbidity, depression, anxiety, unintended pregnancy, poor antenatal care uptake, preterm birth, low birth weight, HIV/STI risk, and even occupational attrition among healthcare workers. For pregnant and postpartum women, routine IPV enquiry during antenatal and reproductive health visits should be prioritised, alongside referral to trauma-based psychological support and linkage with economic and social protection services. For HIV-positive populations, integrating IPV screening into ART adherence and prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) programmes is essential. Health systems must also recognise workplace violence as both a gender equity issue and a contributor to staff burnout, absenteeism, and poor patient outcomes. The clinical evidence is unequivocal: without addressing trauma and violence, gains in maternal, sexual, and reproductive health will remain constrained.
This paper makes several novel contributions. First, it combines thematic, contextual, trend, and intersectional analyses in a single synthesis, providing a uniquely multi-layered understanding of VAWG in Africa. Second, it extends beyond IPV to encompass often-overlooked forms of violence such as in-law abuse, reproductive coercion, workplace harassment, and the dual burden among healthcare workers demonstrating that women’s experiences of violence are complex and extend across multiple spheres of life. Third, by applying an intersectional lens, this review identifies clusters of compounded vulnerability that are rarely captured in conventional epidemiological reports, offering direct guidance for targeted policy and programming. Finally, by integrating temporal trends with equity analysis, the review shows that while national averages have remained relatively stable, concentrated risks persist and are likely worsening in conflict and high HIV-prevalence settings. Taken together, these findings establish a new standard for evidence synthesis on VAWG in Africa and provide a roadmap for interventions and research that centre structural inequality, trauma, and resilience.

Strengths and limitations

This review has several notable strengths. It is, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive synthesis of violence against women and girls (VAWG) in Africa to date, drawing on 80 studies from 22 countries and spanning over two decades of evidence. By integrating four analytic lenses thematic, contextual, trend, and intersectional it provides a multidimensional understanding of both the scale and complexity of violence. The inclusion of diverse populations, such as pregnant women, sex workers, adolescents, healthcare workers, HIV-positive and infertile women, strengthens the relevance of the findings across different life stages and social contexts. Furthermore, the incorporation of intervention trials alongside epidemiological studies highlights not only the magnitude of the problem but also emerging solutions.
There are, however, limitations. Evidence was concentrated in East and Southern Africa, with relatively fewer studies from West and North Africa, limiting regional generalisability. Many studies relied on cross-sectional designs, precluding causal inference. Recall bias, under-reporting due to stigma, and the sensitivity of IPV questions may have underestimated true prevalence. Measurement variability, particularly in non-partner violence and reproductive coercion, restricted comparability. Finally, the synthesis, while robust, was largely descriptive; quantitative meta-analysis was precluded by heterogeneity in study designs, outcomes, and measures.

Conclusions

Violence against women and girls in Africa is widespread, multifaceted, and closely tied to structural inequalities, with particularly high burdens among pregnant women, HIV-positive populations, sex workers, adolescents, infertile women, and healthcare workers. The health consequences are profound, spanning maternal morbidity, mental health disorders, reproductive harm, and occupational stress. While evidence-based interventions such as community mobilisation, couples’ curricula, and trauma-focused care show promise, coverage remains limited. Addressing VAWG requires integrated, trauma-informed, and equity-focused responses embedded within health systems, alongside.

Funding

NIHR Research Capability Fund

Conflicts of interest

All authors report no conflict of interest. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research, the Department of Health and Social Care or the Academic institutions.

Availability of data and material

The data shared within this manuscript is publicly available.

Code availability

Not applicable

Author contributions

GD developed the ELEMI program and conceptualised the ANULA project. NW conducted the data extraction and wrote the first draft. The analysis was conducted by NQ, JQS, GD and NR. The manuscript was critically appraised and furthered by all other authors. All authors reviewed and commented on all versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

Not applicable

Consent to participate

No participants were involved within this paper

Consent for publication

All authors consented to publish this manuscript

Acknowledgements

ELEMI Consortium

References

  1. Pallitto CG-MaC. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. 2013.
  2. UNFPA. ANNUAL REPORT 2017. 2017.
  3. Policy on Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women and Girls (GEEWG) in Humanitarian Action.; 2024.
  4. Harvey S, Lees S, Mshana G, Pilger D, Hansen C, Kapiga S, Watts C. A cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact on intimate partner violence of a 10-session participatory gender training curriculum delivered to women taking part in a group-based microfinance loan scheme in Tanzania (MAISHA CRT01): study protocol. BMC Women’s Health. 2018;18(1). [CrossRef]
  5. Gregg S. Gonsalves EHK, A. David Paltiel. Reducing Sexual Violence by Increasing the Supply of Toilets in Khayelitsha, South Africa: A Mathematical Model. 2015.
  6. Wondimye Ashena BM, Gudina Egata,Yemane Berhane. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Intimate Partner Violence During Pregnancy in Eastern Ethiopia. International Journal of Women’s Health 2020.
  7. Gashaw BT, Magnus JH, Schei B. Intimate partner violence and late entry into antenatal care in Ethiopia. Women and Birth. 2019;32(6):e530-e7. [CrossRef]
  8. Yohannes K, Abebe L, Kisi T, Demeke W, Yimer S, Feyiso M, Ayano G. The prevalence and predictors of domestic violence among pregnant women in Southeast Oromia, Ethiopia. Reproductive Health. 2019;16(1). [CrossRef]
  9. Zelalem Nigussie Azene HYY, Fantahun Ayenew Mekonnen. Intimate partner violence and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care service in Debre Markos town health facilities, Northwest Ethiopia. PLOS one. 2019. [CrossRef]
  10. Eskedar Berhanie DG, Hagos Berihu, Azmera Gerezgiher and Genet Kidane. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a case-control study. BMC Reproductive Health. 2019. [CrossRef]
  11. Kahsay Zenebe Gebreslasie SW, Gelawdiyos Gebre and Mihret-Ab Mehari. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and risk of still birth in hospitals of Tigray region Ethiopia. Italian Journal of Pediatrics - BMC. 2020. [CrossRef]
  12. Lencha B, Ameya G, Baresa G, Minda Z, Ganfure G. Intimate partner violence and its associated factors among pregnant women in Bale Zone, Southeast Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0214962. [CrossRef]
  13. Fekadu E, Yigzaw G, Gelaye KA, Ayele TA, Minwuye T, Geneta T, Teshome DF. Prevalence of domestic violence and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care service at University of Gondar Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Women’s Health. 2018;18(1). [CrossRef]
  14. Abay Woday Tadesse ND, Abigiya Wondimagegnehu, Gebeyaw Biset, Setegn Mihret. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and preterm birth among mothers who gave birth in public hospitals, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: A case-control study. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2020.
  15. Mohammed BH, Johnston JM, Harwell JI, Yi H, Tsang KW-k, Haidar JA. Intimate partner violence and utilization of maternal health care services in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Health Services Research. 2017;17(1). [CrossRef]
  16. López-Goñi JJ, Musa A, Chojenta C, Loxton D. High rate of partner violence during pregnancy in eastern Ethiopia: Findings from a facility-based study. Plos One. 2020;15(6). [CrossRef]
  17. Fiona G Kouyoumdjian LMC, Susan J Bondy, Patricia O’Campo, David Serwadda, Fred Nalugoda, Joseph Kagaayi, Godfrey Kigozi, Maria Wawer and Ronald Gray. Risk factors for intimate partner violence in women in the Rakai Community Cohort Study, Uganda, from 2000 to 2009. BMC Public Health. 2013. [CrossRef]
  18. Mootz JJ, Muhanguzi FK, Panko P, Mangen PO, Wainberg ML, Pinsky I, Khoshnood K. Armed conflict, alcohol misuse, decision-making, and intimate partner violence among women in Northeastern Uganda: a population level study. Conflict and Health. 2018;12(1). [CrossRef]
  19. Gibbs A, Jewkes R, Willan S, Washington L. Associations between poverty, mental health and substance use, gender power, and intimate partner violence amongst young (18-30) women and men in urban informal settlements in South Africa: A cross-sectional study and structural equation model. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0204956. [CrossRef]
  20. Michael C. Ezeanochie BNO, Adedapo B. Ande, Weyinmi E. Kubeyinje & Friday E. Okonofua. Prevalence and correlates of intimate partner violence against HIV-seropositive pregnant women in a Nigerian population. A C TA Obstetricia et Gynecologica. 2011. [CrossRef]
  21. Bedilu Abebe Abate BAWaTTD. Determinants of intimate partner violence during pregnancy among married women in Abay Chomen district, Western Ethiopia: a community based cross sectional study. BMC Women’s Health. 2016.
  22. Olufunmilayo I. Fawole ODBaOO. Experience of gender-based violence to students in public and private secondary schools in Ilorin, Nigeria. 2018.
  23. Leah Okenwa Emegwa SLL, Bjarne JanssonBjarne Jansson. Exposure to Intimate Partner Violence Amongst Women of Reproductive Age in Lagos, Nigeria: Prevalence and Predictors. J Fam. 2009.
  24. Deborah A Gust YP, Fred Otieno, Tameka Hayes,Tereza Omoro, Penelope A Phillips–Howard, Fred Odongo, George O Otieno. Factors associated with physical violence by a sexual partner among girls and women in rural Kenya. Journal of Global health. 2017. [CrossRef]
  25. Eunice Kimani JOaDA. Factors increasing vulnerability to sexual violence of adolescent girls in Limuru sub-county, Kenya. African journal of Midwifery and Women’s health. 2016.
  26. Mathewos Fute ZBM, Negash Wakgari and Gizachew Assefa Tessema. High prevalence of workplace violence among nurses working at public health facilities in Southern Ethiopia. BMC nursing. 2015. [CrossRef]
  27. Girmatsion Feseha AGmaMG. Intimate partner physical violence among women in Shimelba refugee camp, northern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2012.
  28. Gladys Matseke VJR, Karl Peltzer, and Deborah Jones. Intimate partner violence among HIV positive pregnant women in South Africa. J Psychol Afr 2017. [CrossRef]
  29. Wandera SO, Kwagala B, Ndugga P, Kabagenyi A. Partners’ controlling behaviors and intimate partner sexual violence among married women in Uganda. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:214. [CrossRef]
  30. Lyons CE, Grosso A, Drame FM, Ketende S, Diouf D, Ba I, et al. Physical and Sexual Violence Affecting Female Sex Workers in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire: Prevalence, and the Relationship with the Work Environment, HIV, and Access to Health Services. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2017;75(1):9-17. [CrossRef]
  31. Heidi Stöckl CWJKKM. Physical violence by a partner during pregnancy in Tanzania: prevalence and risk factors. Reproductive Health Matters. 2010.
  32. Mahenge B, Stockl H, Abubakari A, Mbwambo J, Jahn A. Physical, Sexual, Emotional and Economic Intimate Partner Violence and Controlling Behaviors during Pregnancy and Postpartum among Women in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0164376. [CrossRef]
  33. Selin A, DeLong SM, Julien A, MacPhail C, Twine R, Hughes JP, et al. Prevalence and Associations, by Age Group, of IPV Among AGYW in Rural South Africa. Sage Open. 2019;9(1). [CrossRef]
  34. Malavika Prabhu BM, Jan Ostermann, Dafrosa Itemba, Bernard Njaub,Nathan Thielman. Prevalence and correlates of intimate partner violence among women attending HIV voluntary counseling and testing in northern Tanzania, 2005–2008. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011. [CrossRef]
  35. Delamou A, Samandari G, Camara BS, Traore P, Diallo FG, Millimono S, et al. Prevalence and correlates of intimate partner violence among family planning clients in Conakry, Guinea. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:814. [CrossRef]
  36. Graham SM, Gibbs A, Carpenter B, Crankshaw T, Hannass-Hancock J, Smit J, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with recent intimate partner violence and relationships between disability and depression in post-partum women in one clinic in eThekwini Municipality, South Africa. Plos One. 2017;12(7). [CrossRef]
  37. M. Malan MFSaKS. The prevalence and predictors of intimate partner violence among pregnant women attending a midwife and obstetrics unit in the Western Cape. Global mental health. 2018.
  38. Fawole Olufunmilayo I DAT. Prevalence and correlates of violence against female sex workers in Abuja, Nigeria. African Health sciences. 2014.
  39. Ogum Alangea D, Addo-Lartey AA, Sikweyiya Y, Chirwa ED, Coker-Appiah D, Jewkes R, Adanu RMK. Prevalence and risk factors of intimate partner violence among women in four districts of the central region of Ghana: Baseline findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0200874. [CrossRef]
  40. Reese BM, Chen MS, Nekkanti M, Mulawa MI. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Women’s Past-Year Physical IPV Perpetration and Victimization in Tanzania. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2017;36(3-4):1141-67. [CrossRef]
  41. Edwin Were KC, Sinead Delany-Moretlwe, Edith Nakku-Joloba, Nelly R.Mugo,James Kiarie, Elizabeth A. Bukusi, Connie Celum, Jared M. Baeten. A Prospective Study of Frequency and Correlates of Intimate Partner Violence among African Heterosexual HIV Serodiscordant Couples. 2018. [CrossRef]
  42. Kathryn L. Falb JA, Mazeda Hossain, Monika Topolska, Denise Kpebo,and Jhumka Gupta. Recent abuse from in-laws and associations with adverse experiences during the crisis among rural Ivorian women: Extended families as part of the ecological model. Glob Public Health. 2013. [CrossRef]
  43. Matthew J Breiding AR, Jama Gulaid, Curtis Blanton, James A Mercy, Linda L Dahlberg, Nonhlanhla Dlaminid & Sapna Bamrahe. Risk factors associated with sexual violence towards girls in Swaziland. 2011. [CrossRef]
  44. Negussie Deyessa YB, Mary Ellsberg,Maria Emmelin, Gunnar Kullgren and Ulf Hogberg. Violence against women in relation to literacy and area of residence in Ethiopia. BGlobal Health Action. 2010. [CrossRef]
  45. Ebrima J. Sisawo SYYAOaS-LH. Workplace violence against nurses in the Gambia: mixed methods design. BMC Health Services Research. 2017.
  46. Laura K. MurrayI JK, Nancy Glass, Stephanie Skavenski van WykI, Flor Melendez, Ravi Paul, Carla Kmett Danielson, Sarah M. MurrayI,John Mayeya, Francis Simenda, Paul Bolton. Effectiveness of the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) in reducing intimate partner violence and hazardous alcohol use in Zambia (VATU): A randomized controlled trial. PLOS One - Medicine. 2020. [CrossRef]
  47. Zoé Mistrale Hendrickson AML, Noya Galai, Jessie K Mbwambo,Samuel Likindikoki,6 Deanna L Kerrigan. Work-related mobility and experiences of gender-based violence among female sex workers in Iringa, Tanzania: a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from Project Shikamana. BMJ Open. 2018.
  48. Constance J Newman DHdV, Jeanne d’Arc Kanakuze and Gerard Ngendahimana. Workplace violence and gender discrimination in Rwanda’s health workforce: Increasing safety and gender equality. Human Resources for Health 2011. [CrossRef]
  49. Amsal Seraw Alemie HYY, Ejigu Gebeye Zeleke and Birye Dessalegn Mekonnen. Intimate partner violence and associated factors among HIV positive women attending antiretroviral therapy clinics in Gondar city, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Women’s Health. 2023. [CrossRef]
  50. Shiferaw EAaY. Disparities in Intimate Partner Violence among Currently Married Women from Food Secure and Insecure Urban Households in South Ethiopia: A Community Based Comparative Cross-Sectional Study. BioMed Research International. 2018.
  51. Tsai AC, Tomlinson M, Comulada WS, Rotheram-Borus MJ. Intimate Partner Violence and Depression Symptom Severity among South African Women during Pregnancy and Postpartum: Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(1):e1001943. [CrossRef]
  52. Jiepin Cao JAG, Mohammed Ali, Margaret Lillie Elena McEwan, John Koku Awoonor-Williams , John Hembling, Safiyatu Abubakr-Bibilazu4, Haliq Adam ,and Joy Noel Baumgartner. The impact of a maternal mental health intervention on intimate partner violence in Northern Ghana and the mediating roles of social support and couple communication: secondary analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2021. [CrossRef]
  53. Mwumvaneza Mutagoma LN, Dieudonne ’ Sebuhoro, David J Riedel and Joseph Ntaganira. Sexual and physical violence and associated factors among female sex workers in Rwanda: a cross-sectional survey. International journal of STD&AIDS. 2018.
  54. Peter Memiah TAM, Kourtney Prevot, Courtney K. Cook, Michelle M. Mwangi, E. Wairimu Mwangi, Kevin Owuor, and Sibhatu Biadgilign. The Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence, Associated Risk Factors, and Other Moderating Effects: Findings From the Kenya National Health Demographic Survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2018. [CrossRef]
  55. Rachel Jewkes YS, Mzikazi Nduna, Nwabisa Jama Shai & Kristin Dunkle. Motivations for , and perceptions and experiences of participating in, a cluster randomised controlled trial of a HIV-behavioural intervention in rural South Africa. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2012. [CrossRef]
  56. Hanan M. Ghoneim OTT, Zakia M. Ibrahim and Amal A. Ahmed. Violence and sexual dysfunction among infertile Egyptian women. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2021. [CrossRef]
  57. Zubairu Iliyasu HSG, Sanusi Abubakar, Maryam S. Auwala, Chisom Odoh,Hamisu M. Salihu, Muktar H. Aliyu. Phenotypes of intimate partner violence among women experiencing infertility in Kano, Northwest Nigeria. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2015. [CrossRef]
  58. Allison P. Pack KLE, Peter Mwarogo & Nzioki Kingola. Intimate partner violence against female sex workers in Mombasa, Kenya. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2014. [CrossRef]
  59. M. C. Greene JCKaWAT. Alcohol use and intimate partner violence among women and their partners in sub-Saharan Africa. Global Mental Health 2017.
  60. Gebrezgi BH, Badi MB, Cherkose EA, Weldehaweria NB. Factors associated with intimate partner physical violence among women attending antenatal care in Shire Endaselassie town, Tigray, northern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study, July 2015. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):76. [CrossRef]
  61. S Mashaphu GEW, E Gomo,and A Tomita. Intimate partner violence among HIV-serodiscordant couples in Durban, South Africa. S Afr Med J 2018. [CrossRef]
  62. Lalem Menber Belay NM. Intimate partner violence against pregnant women in East Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia. 2019.
  63. Naeemah Abrahams RJ, Carl Lombard, Shanaaz Mathews, Jacquelyn Campbell & Banwari Meel. Impact of telephonic psycho-social support on adherence to post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) after rape. AIDS Care. 2010. [CrossRef]
  64. Vyas S. Violence Against Women in Tanzania and its Association With Health-Care Utilisation and Out-of-Pocket Payments: An Analysis of the 2015 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey. East African Health Research Journal 2019.
  65. Kristin Dunkle ES, Sangeeta Chatterji, Lori Heise. Effective prevention of intimate partner violence through couples training: a randomised controlled trial of Indashyikirwa in Rwanda. BMJ Global Health. 2020. [CrossRef]
  66. Katherine G. MerrillI JCC, Michele R. Decker, John McGready,Virginia M. Burke, Jonathan K. Mwansa, Sam Miti, Christiana Frimpong, Caitlin E. Kennedy, Julie A. Denison. Prevalence of physical and sexual violence and psychological abuse among adolescents and young adults living with HIV in Zambia. PLOS ONE. 2020. [CrossRef]
  67. Bright Opoku Ahinkorah KSDaA-AS. Women decision-making capacity and intimate partner violence among women in sub-Saharan Africa. Archives of Public Health. 2018.
  68. Ameh N. KTS, Onuh S.O., Okohue J.E., Umeora D.U.J., Anozie O.B. Burden of domestic violence among infertile women attending fertility clinics in Nigeria. Nigerian journal of medicine. 2007.
  69. Nambusi Kyegombea, TA, KMDa, LMb, , b JN, et al. What is the potential for interventions designed to prevent violence against women to reduce children’s exposure to violence? Findings from the SASA! study, Kampala, Uganda. 2015.
  70. Mhairi A. Gibson EG, Beatriz Cobo, María M. Rueda, and Isabel M. Scott. Measuring Hidden Support for Physical Intimate Partner Violence: A List Randomization Experiment in South-Central Ethiopia. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2020. [CrossRef]
  71. Michele R. Decker SP, Adesola Olumide,Rajib Acharya, Oladosu Ojengbede, Laura Covarrubias, Ersheng Gao, Yan Cheng, Sinead Delany-Moretlwe and Heena Brahmbhatt. Prevalence and Health Impact of Intimate Partner Violence and Non-partner Sexual Violence Among Female Adolescents Aged15-19 Years in Vulnerable Urban Environments: A Multi Country Study. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2014. [CrossRef]
  72. Cockcroft A, Marokoane N, Kgakole L, Tswetla N, Andersson N. Access of choice-disabled young women in Botswana to government structural support programmes: a cross-sectional study. AIDS Care. 2018;30(sup2):24-7. [CrossRef]
  73. Nakku-Joloba E, Kiguli J, Kayemba CN, Twimukye A, Mbazira JK, Parkes-Ratanshi R, et al. Perspectives on male partner notification and treatment for syphilis among antenatal women and their partners in Kampala and Wakiso districts, Uganda. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):124. [CrossRef]
  74. Nicola J Christofides AMH, Angelica Pino, Dumisani Rebombo,Ruari Santiago McBride, Althea Anderson, Dean Peacock. A cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effect of community mobilisation and advocacy on men’s use of violence in periurban South Africa: study protocol. BMJ 2018. [CrossRef]
  75. Cheru Tulu EK, Dame Hirkisa, Zebiba Kedir, Lensa Abdurahim, Gemechu Ganfure, Jemal Muhammed, Kenbon Seyoum, Genet Fikadu, Ashenafi Mekonnen. Prevalence of Domestic Violence and Associated Factors among Antenatal Care Attending Women at Robe Hospital, Southeast Ethiopia. Clinics in Mother and Child Health 2019.
  76. Ashenafi W, Mengistie B, Egata G, Berhane Y. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Intimate Partner Violence During Pregnancy in Eastern Ethiopia. Int J Womens Health. 2020;12:339-58. [CrossRef]
  77. Ameh CA, Azene ZN, Yeshita HY, Mekonnen FA. Intimate partner violence and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care service in Debre Markos town health facilities, Northwest Ethiopia. Plos One. 2019;14(7). [CrossRef]
  78. Malan M, Spedding MF, Sorsdahl K. The prevalence and predictors of intimate partner violence among pregnant women attending a midwife and obstetrics unit in the Western Cape. Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2018;5:e18.
  79. Yenealem DG, Woldegebriel MK, Olana AT, Mekonnen TH. Violence at work: determinants & prevalence among health care workers, northwest Ethiopia: an institutional based cross sectional study. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2019;31:8. [CrossRef]
  80. Stöckl H, Watts C, Kilonzo Mbwambo JK. Physical violence by a partner during pregnancy in Tanzania: prevalence and risk factors. Reproductive Health Matters. 2010;18(36):171-80. [CrossRef]
  81. Bloom BE, Wagman JA, Dunkle K, Fielding-Miller R. Exploring intimate partner violence among pregnant Eswatini women seeking antenatal care: How agency and food security impact violence-related outcomes. Glob Public Health. 2022;17(12):3465-75. [CrossRef]
  82. Fute M, Mengesha ZB, Wakgari N, Tessema GA. High prevalence of workplace violence among nurses working at public health facilities in Southern Ethiopia. BMC Nurs. 2015;14:9. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Multi-country trend figure (2000–2020).
Figure 1. Multi-country trend figure (2000–2020).
Preprints 183842 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of the studies included in the systematic review.
Table 1. Characteristics of the studies included in the systematic review.
ID
Author Country Study type
Methodology
Setting Population Age
Sample size
Findings/ Outcome
Outcome measure
1 Gonsalve, Kaplan & Paltiel[6]
South Africa Mathematical model Quantitative Urban N/A N/A N/A Less sanitation facilities leads to major risk of sexual assault for women. Census and statistics 2015,2016
2 Ashenafi et al.[7]
Eastern Ethiopia Cross sectional Quantitative Rural& urban Postpartum mothers 15–44 years
3015 WHO multi-country study questionnaire
3 B.T. Gashaw et al. [8] Ethiopia Cross sectional Descriptive Acute Pregnant women 15–45 years
720 Among multiparous
women, any lifetime emotional or physical abuse was associated with late ANC
The standardized and validated abuse assessment screening
(AAS) tool
4 Yohannes et al. [9]
Ethiopia Cross sectional Quantitative Acute
Pregnant women 18–50 years
299 Physical violence was reported as the
commonest type of violence
Being illeterate, husband’s alcohol consumption, husband history of arrest, occupation of husband were significantly associated with domestic violence against pregnant women.
A structured World Health Organization (WHO) multi-country study questionnaire
5 Azene, Yeshita & Mekonnen[10] Ethiopia Cross sectional Quantitative one referral hospital,
three public health Centers, seven private clinics and 14 health posts, seven in rural and seven
in urban areas
Pregnant women Not mentioned
409
The prevalence of psychological,
physical, and sexual violence was 29.1%, 21%, 19.8% respectively

A structured questionnaire
6 Berhanie et al.[11]
Ethiopia Case -control Quantitative Acute Pregnant women 16-48 years 954 women who had been exposed to physical
violence during pregnancy were five times more likely to experience low birth weight
Pre-tested structured questionnaire
7 Gebreslasie et al.[12]
Ethiopia Cross sectional Quantitative Acute Post- partum women 19-35 years 648 statistically significant association
between exposure to intimate partner violence during pregnancy and still birth. Pregnant women who were exposed
to intimate partner violence during pregnancy
A structured questionnaire
8 Lencha et al.[13] Ethiopia Cross sectional Quantitative Acute Pregnant women Not mentioned 612 Physical violence
(20.3%), sexual violence (36.3%), psychological/emotional violence (33.0), controlling
behavior violence (30.4%) and economic violence (27.0) were the type of IPV encountered
by participants.
Pre-tested structured questionnaire
9 Fekadu et al.[14]
Ethiopia Cross sectional Quantitative Acute Pregnant women 18 to 49 years
450 Of the total pregnant women surveyed, 58.7% were victims of at least one form of domestic violence during
pregnancy,
Pre-tested structured questionnaire
10 Tadesse et al.[15] Ethiopia Case -control Quantitative Acute Post- partum women 138 cases and 276 controls
Any IPV during pregnancy was significantly associated with PTB
IPV
questionnaire was adopted and modified from the
Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (21) and
the WHO 2005 Multi-Country study
11 Mohammed
Et al.[16]
Ethiopia Cross sectional Quantitative Acute Couples 18 to 42 years
210 male/female pairs IPV is prevalent in Ethiopia where three out of four women reported
having experienced one or more type of IPV.
self-reported questionnaires
12 Musa et al.[17] Ethiopia Cross sectional Quantitative Acute Post- partum women 15–49 years
648 The prevalence of intimate partner violence during the most recent pregnancy was found to
be 39.81%
interviewer-administered standardized questionnaire based on the World
Health Organization Multi-Country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence
against Women survey
13 Kouyoumdjian et al. [18]
Uganda Cohort study Quantitative Community Female
participants who had at least one sexual partner
15 to 49 years
15081 Risk factors for IPV from childhood and early adulthood included sexual abuse in childhood or
adolescence, earlier age at first sex, lower levels of education, and forced first sex.
Revised Conflict Tactics Scales
14 Mootz et al. [19] Uganda Survey Quantitative Community Women 13 – 49 years
605 Most respondents (88.8%) experienced conflict-related violence.
Survey questions
15 Gibbs et al.[20] South Africa Cross sectional Quantitative Urban Men and women 18-30 years 680 women and 677 men
Two third of women experienced physical or/and sexual IPV over past year.
WHO violence against women scale
16 Owusu Adjah and Agbemafle[21]
Ghana Cross sectional (Secondary data analysis) Quantitative Community Married women 16-49 years 2563 Of the 1524 ever married women in this study, 33.6%
had ever experienced domestic violence (some form of
sexual, physical or emotional violence) and 87% were
currently married.
Household questionnaire
17 Abebe Abate et al.[22]
Ethiopia Cross sectional Quantitative Community Married pregnant women
15–49 years
282 The prevalence of intimate partner violence during recent pregnancy was 44.5%.
WHO multi-country study questionnaire
18 Fawole et al.[23] Nigeria Cross sectional Quantitative Schools Students 10-21 years 640 At least one form of GBV was experienced by 89.1% of public and 84.8% private schools students
Self-administered questionnaire.
19 Okenwa et al.[24] Nigeria Cross sectional Quantitative Acute Women 15-49 years 934 The 1 year prevalence of IPV was 29%, with
significant proportions reporting psychological (23%), physical
(9%) and sexual (8%) abuse.
A structured questionnaire
20 Gust et al.[25] Kenya Cross sectional Descriptive Community Women and girls 8003 Among 8003 participants, 11.6% reported physical violence by a sexual partner in the last
12 months
A survey
21 Kimani, Osero and Akunga[26]
Kenya Cross sectional Mixed Shool Adolescent girls 15–19 years.
301 Among the respondents, 33% were victims of
sexual violence.
self-administered questionnaires
22 Fute et al. [27]
Ethiopia Cross sectional Quantitative Community Nurses 25–52 years.
660 The prevalence of workplace violence was 29.9%
A pre-tested and structured questionnaire
23 Feseha et al.[28]
Ethiopia Cross sectional Quantitative Refugee camp Refugee women Not mentioned 422 The prevalence of physical violence in the last 12 months and lifetime were 107(25.5%) and 131(31.0%)
respectively.
A pre-
tested interviewer guided structured questionnaire
24 Matseke et al.[29]
South Africa Randomised controlled trial Descriptive Community health centres HIV-positive pregnant women
18 years or older
673 Overall, 56.3% reported having experienced either psychological or
physical IPV.
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale 10
IPV was assessed using an adaptation of the Conflict
Tactics Scale 18
HIV serostatus disclosure was assessed using an adapted version of the
Disclosure Scale
25 Wandera et al.[30]
Uganda Cross-sectional Survey Community Women who were in a union
15-35+ years 1307 More than a quarter (27%) of women who were in a union in Uganda reported Initimate Partner Sexual Violence.
Shortened and
modified version of the Conflict Tactics Scale
26 Lyons et al.[31]
Abidjan Cross-sectional Quantitati Communi Women (assigned female sex at birth, and engaged in sex work as a primary source of income) 18 years or older
466 Police refusal of protection was associated with physical and sexual violence
interviewer-administered questionnaires
27 H Stöckl et al.[32]
Tanzania Cross-sectional Quantitative Acute Pregnant women 15–49
years
2503 In total, 7% (n=88) of women in Dar es Salaam
and 12% (n=147) of women in Mbeya reported
having experienced violence during pregnancy.
Pretested questionnaire
28 Mahenge et al.[33] Tanzania Cross-sectional Quantitative Acute 1-9 months postpatum women 18-<36 years 500 18.8% experienced some physical and/or sexual
violence during pregnancy.
Structured questionnaire
29 Selin et al.[34]
Soth Africa Randomised control trial Quantitative Rural Adolescent girls and young women
13-20 years 2,533
Nearly one quarter (19.5%, 95% CI = [18.0,
21.2]) of AGYW experienced any IPV ever (physical or sexual) by a partner.
Survey
30 M. C. Ezeanochie et al.[21]
Nigeria Cross-sectional Quantitative Acute HIV-positive women
21 - 43 years
305 Intimate partner
violence was reported by 99 women, giving a prevalence of
32.5% .
semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire.
31 Prabhu et al.[35]
Tanzania Cross-sectional Quantitative HIV voluntary counseling and testing center
Women 18-<40 years 2436 432 (17.7%) reported IPV during their lifetime.
Standardised 44 item questionnaire
32 Delamou et al. [36]
Guinea Cross-sectional Quantitative Acute Women 15-49 years 232 213 (92%) experienced IPV in one form or another at some point in their
lifetime.
IPV screening questionnaire
33 Gibbs et al. (2017)[37] South Africa Cross-sectional Quantitative Acute Postpartuem women 18- <35 years 275 Prevalence of past 12-month sexual and/or physical IPV was 10.55% (n = 29).
Structured questionnaires
34 Malan, Spedding and Sorsdahl[38]
Western Cpe Cross-sectional Quantitive Acute Pregnant women
18 years or older
150 Lifetime and 12-month prevalence rates for any IPV were 44%.
Self-report measures
Socio-demographics questionnaire
WHO interpersonal violence questionnaire (IPVQ)
Childhood trauma questionnaire (CTQ)
Alcohol use disorder identi cation test (AUDIT)
Exposure to community violence questionnaire
The Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS)
35 Olufunmilayo and Abosede[39]
Nigeria Cross-sectional Analytical Community Female sex workers 22 -
30 years
283 Sexual violence was the commonest type
(41.9%) of violence experienced, followed by economic (37.7%), physical violence (35.7%) and psychological (31.9%).
Semi-structured
interviewer administered questionnaire and in-depth
interview guide.
36 Alangea et al.[40] Ghana Randomised control trial Descriptive exploratory Community Female 18 to 49 years
2000 Half of women (50.9%) had experienced IPV in their lifetime; with ever experi-
ence of sexual or physical IPV.
A structured quantitative survey
37 Reese et al.[41] Tanzania Secondary data analysis Quantitative Community Women 15–49
years
10139 Approximately 1.5% (n =94) of women reported perpetrating isolated physical IPV
Domestic violence module (questionnaire)
38 Were et al.[42]
East and South Africa Randomised control trial Quantitative Community HIV serodiscordant couples
N/A 3408
IPV was reported at 2.7% of quarterly visits by HIV infected women.
Interview
39 Falb et al.[43]
West Africa Secondary analysis Quantitative Rural Women N/A 981 Half of women reported lifetime physical or sexual IPV, and nearly 1 in 5
(18.6%) reported experiencing reproductive coercion.
Survey
40 Breiding et al.[44]
Swaziland
Survey Quantitative Community Female 13 - 24 years
1244 The
risk of experiencing sexual violence in
childhood was significantly higher among
respondents who reported having had no
relationship with their biological mothers
Survey questionnaire
41 Negussie Deyessa et al.[45]
Ethiopia Cross-sectional Quantitative rural and semi-urban
Married women 15–49
years
1994 Violence against women was more prevalent in rural
communities.
A standardised WHO questionnaire
42 Yenealem et al.
Ethiop Cross-sectional Quantitative Acute Health care workers
25- years<35 553 The prevalence of workplace violence was found to be 58.2%
Structured self administered
questionnaire
43 Sisawo et al. [46]
Gambia Cross-sectional Mixed Health administrative regions Nurses 30> years 219 A sizable majority of respondents (62.1%) reported exposure to violence in the 12 months prior to the survey;
exposure to verbal abuse, physical violence, and sexual harassment was 59.8%, 17.2%, and 10% respectively.
self-administered questionnaire
44 Murrayl et al.[47] Zambia Randomised control trial Quantitative Community Couples 18-66 + years 123 112 clients reported active IPV
N/A
45 Hendrickson ZM, et al.[48]
Tanzania Cross-sectional Quantitative Community Female sex workers 18–55 years
496 Forty per cent of participants experienced
recent physical or sexual violence, and 30% recently
experienced severe physical or sexual violence.
WHO’s Alcohol
Use Disorders Identification Test assessment
46 Newman et al. [49]
Rwanda Survey Mixed Community Health workers N/A 297 Thirty-nine percent of health workers had experienced some form of workplace violence in year prior to the
study.
health workers survey, facility manager and key informant
interviews, patient focus groups and a facility risk assess-
ment inventory (NB: This article draws only from a subset
of health worker survey, key informant and facility man-
ager interview,
47 Alemie et al. [50]
Ethiopia Cross-sectional Quantitative Acute HIV positive women 19-<45 years 626 The overall prevalence of intimate partner violence against HIV positive women within the last 12 months
was 64.2%
A pretested structured interviewer-administered ques-
tionnaire
48 Andarge and Shiferaw[51]
Ethiopia Cross-sectional Quantitative Community Married women 15-49
years
696 LifetimeandcurrentIPVwere62.4%and
50%,respectively.
A pretested and structured questionnaire
49 Tsai et al.[52] South Africa Cohort Longitudenal Community Pregnant women 1238 IPV intensity had a statistically significant association with
depression symptom severity
Survey and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
50 Cao et al.[53]
Ghana Randomised control trial Quantitative Community Pregnant women 16< years 374 The IPV prevalence was in high sample with 84.8%
Ghana Demographic and Health Survey
51 Mutagoma et al.[54]
Rwanda Cross-sectional survey
Quantitative Community Female sex workers ≥15 years
1978 - Violence prevalence: 18.1% raped/forced sex during sex work, 35.6% experienced physical violence.

Survey
52 Memiah et al.[55]
Kenya Cross-sectional Quantitative Community Women ever-partnered
aged 15–49 years, 3028 - Higher odds of IPV associated with: age 40–49 yrs, urban residence, being employed, poor wealth index, early sexual debut (<18), low education, partners aged >50 yrs, and attitudes justifying wife-beating.
Survey
53 R. Jewkes et al.[56]
South Africa Cluster randomized control trial Quantitative Community Young women and men, normally resident, able to consent
Intended: 16–23 years; Actual: 15–26 years
Baseline: 1,415 women & 1,367 men; Follow-up: 1,085 women & 985 men
- Main motivations: HIV testing, community benefit, smaller proportion for incentive (R20).
structured questionnaire
54 Ghoneim et al.[57]
Egypt Cross-sectional Quantitative Community Women 18–45 year
303 There was no signi cant difference between both groups in rates of exposure to violence (p-value
0.830). Primary infertility was a signi cant contributing factor in infertile women’s exposure to violence
(p-value 0.001)
Arabic validated NorVold Domestic Abuse
Questionnaire
55 Z. Iliyasu et al.[58]
Nigeria Cross-sectional Quatitative Acute Women range 18–45 years
373
- Prevalence of IPV in past year: 35.9% (95% CI 31.1–41.0).
- Types: psychological (94%), sexual (82.8%), verbal (35.1%), physical (18.7%), economic (66.4%).
- 25.4% experienced multiple forms of IPV.
- Main perpetrators: spouses.
CTS2 (Conflict Tactics Scale, revised).
56 A.P. Pack et al.[59]
Kenya Cross-sectional Quantitative Community Female sex workers
≥18 years (majority >24 years: 60.6%)
619 - Prevalence of IPV (last 30 days): 78.7%.
- Perpetrators: both clients & non-paying partners.
survey
57 M.C.Greene et al.[60] 14 Sub Saharan Africa population-based cross-
sectional survey
(multilevel mixed-effects model)
Quantitative Community Women 15-49 years 86024 Prevalence of partner alcohol use and IPV ranged substantially across countries (3–62 and 11–60%, respect-
ively).
Demographic and Health
Surveys
58 Gebrezgi et al.[61]
Ethiopia Cross-sectional Mixed Acute Pregnant women 15->34 422 The prevalence of intimate partner physical violence in pregnancy was 20.6% (
Interview, pretested semi-structured locally adapted question-
naire
59 Harvey et al.
Tanzania Cluster randomized control trial Mixed Community Women Not mentioned 66 Baseline interviews with
participants indicate a prevalence of physical and/or sex-
ual IPV during the past 12 months of 27% (95% confi-
dence interval: 24% to 29%)
Structured questionnaires, In depth interview guides
60 Mashaphu et al.[62]
South Africa Cross-sectional Quantitative Community serodiscordant couples
aged ≥18 year
30 Exposure to IPV differed significantly between men (28.6%) and women (89.3%) (proportional
Questionnaire
61 Belay and Menber[63] Ethiopia Cross-sectional Quantitative Acute Married women below the age 30 years old
119 Nearly half (46.4%) of the study participants were victims of at least one episodes of intimate
partner violence in the recent pregnancy. Psychological violence 141 (44.2%) was the most common form
of violence encountered followed by sexual violence 137 (42.9%).
structured and
pretested questionnaire
62 Abrahams et al.[64] South Africa RCT Quantitative Acute Rape survivors
10 - >22 years 279 The follow-up
rate for the control arm was 92.7% and 91.9% for the
intervention arm.
Telephone call conversations
63 Vyas S.[65]
Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey
Quantitative Acute Women Mean age 29 years 9,304
In total, 3,868 (43.2%) women reported that they had experi-
enced physical or sexual violence by a partner or non-partner
household questionnaire
64 Dunkle K, et al.[66]
Rwanda RCT Quantitative Community Couples <25->35 years 828 women and 821
men
at endline, 815 women (98.4%) and 763
men (92.9%) in the intervention and 802 women (96.4%)
and 773 men (93.1%) were available for intention- to- treat
analysis
Adapted WHO violence against women
instrument
65 Tchamo et al.
Mozambique Population based analysis Quantitative Community Stakeholders and population Not mentioned 850,881
(Patients)
The economic
cost of VAW in Maputo, Matola, Beira, and Nampula, for a time horizon of
4 years (2005–2008), was US$1,473,828.7, with the health sector absorbing
about 81% of the amount, justice 17%, and organizations working in the area
of prevention with 2%.
Interviews
66 Merrill et al.[67] Zambia RCT Quantitative Acute HIV-positive adolescents and young adults
15–24 years
272 prevalence of any violence victimization was 78.2%. Past-year preva-
lence was 72.0% among males and 74.5% among females.
survey
67 Ahinkorah et al. [68]
Sub saharan Africa Survey Quantitative Community Women 15–49
84,486
The odds of reporting ever experienced IPV was higher among women with decision-making capacity [AOR = 1.
35; CI = 1.35–1.48].
survey
68 Ameh et al.[69] Nigeria Cross sectional Quantitative Acute Infertile women 20-40+ years 233 41% women experienced domestic violence. Questionnaire
69 N. Kyegombe et al. [70]
Uganda RCT Mixed Community women 15–49
years
419 men, 343 women At follow-up, women in intervention communities were less likely to report past year experience of physical or sexual
IPV than their control counterparts (aRR 0.68, 95% CI 0.16–1.39)
Interview guide and quantitative questionnaire
70 Gibson et al.[71]
Ethiopia survey Quantitative Community adults 18-26+ years 809 The survey shows that only 18% of people openly say wife-beating is acceptable, but indirect questions suggest about 28% support it. population-based demographic survey
71 Dibaba et al.
Oromia Cross sectional Quantitative Community Female youth 15 to 424years
600
15.3% youth had experienced rape
Adapted from other studies
72 Chirwa ED. Et al.[40]
Ghana RCT Quantitative Community Adult men)
(≥18 years 2126
Lifetime IPV perpetration: 50% of men
Interview guide
73 Tadesse et al. Ethiopia Case control study
Quantitative Acute Mothers who gave birth before 37 completed weeks of gestation
15- ≥35
years
138 cases and 276 controls
the prevalence of any IPV during pregnancy was 44.8% among cases and 25% among
controls.
IPV
questionnaire was adopted and modified from the
Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (21) and
the WHO 2005 Multi-Country
74 M.R. Decker et al. [72] Baltimore, Maryland, USA; New Delhi, India;
Ibadan, Nigeria; Johannesburg, South Africa; and Shanghai, China
survey Quantitative Community Female Adolescents
15 - 19 Years
1,112
Among ever-partnered women, past-year IPV prevalence ranged from 10.2% in Shanghai
to 36.6% in Johannesburg. Lifetime non-partner sexual violence ranged from 1.2% in Shanghai to
12.6% in Johannesburg.
survey
75 Cockcroft et al.[73]
Botswana Cross-sectional Quantitative Community Young women 15–29 years
3,516
8% reported sexual violence
Interview guide
76 Nakku-Joloba et al.[74]
Uganda N/A Qualitative Community Male and female 25–44
years
54 Fourteen of 22 (63%) female participants reported that they sometimes experienced
domestic violence. Male participant’s knowledge of syphilis and their perception of their valued role as responsible
fathers of an unborn baby facilitated return.
Interview guide
77 Christofides NJ, et al.[75] South Africa Cluster RCT Quantitative Community male 18–40 years
2600 intervention expected to reduce men’s perpetration of physical/sexual VAW and improve gender-equitable norms
audio computer-assisted self-interview questionnaire
78 Tulu C, et al.[76]
Ethiopia Cross-sectional Quantitative Acute Pregnant women
<20- >34 years
385 Overall prevalence of domestic violence during pregnancy: 24.5%. Factors significantly associated with domestic violence: partner alcohol consumption, unplanned pregnancy, and unwanted pregnancy
Questionnaire
Table 2. Themes and sub-themes identified alongside of determinants and exposures.
Table 2. Themes and sub-themes identified alongside of determinants and exposures.
Theme Sub-themes Determinants Exposures Evidence synthesis
Forms of violence Physical, sexual, psychological, economic, reproductive coercion, in-law abuse, workplace harassment WHO/DHS IPV items; workplace violence tools; reproductive coercion scales IPV 30–65%; pregnancy IPV 25–60%; CSA ~33%; FSWs 50%+; WPV 30–62%
Determinants Alcohol/substance use; poverty/food insecurity; low education; childhood trauma; partner control; infertility stigma; disability; conflict Individual, relationship, community, societal (WHO ecological model) Logistic regression, mediation analysis, DHS pooled regressions Consistent drivers in >80% of studies; partner alcohol strongest predictor
Health and social outcomes Maternal morbidity, depression, anxiety, poor ANC use, adverse birth outcomes (preterm, LBW, stillbirth), HIV/STI risk, sexual dysfunction, workplace stress EPDS, FSFI, birth outcomes, ANC attendance, STI/HIV status IPV linked to depression (β=1.04–1.54), unintended pregnancy, poor adherence to PMTCT/PEP, low ANC uptake
Protective factors/interventions Education, joint decision-making, social support, couple communication, gender-transformative curricula, psychotherapy, economic empowerment Individual/relationship/community SASA! cRCT; Indashyikirwa cRCT; CETA psychotherapy RCT; MAISHA trial Demonstrated reductions in IPV and improved co-benefits (mental health, food security, parenting)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated