Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Elevated Cardiac Troponin in Non-Cardiac Conditions Unrelated to Acute Myocardial Infarction

Submitted:

04 November 2025

Posted:

05 November 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Cardiac troponins (cTn) T and I are biochemical markers of myocardial injury. In this systematic review article, we aim to summarize the mechanisms and significance of cardiac troponin (cTn) elevation unrelated to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the most frequently occurring non-cardiac conditions, where the accurate interpretation of elevated cTn levels is often challenging. Different mechanisms in non-cardiac conditions can cause non-ischemic myocardial injury. Understanding the pathophysiology of cTn release is an essential precondition for minimizing unnecessary, costly, and potentially risky (cardiac) interventions and for providing timely and appropriate medical care. Elevated cTn in critically ill patients, in patients with chronic disease/conditions, is an independent predictor (risk factor) of cardiovascular and overall mortality. Treatment of underlying conditions is of primary importance, and close monitoring for the occurrence of cardiovascular complications during hospitalizations should be considered in these patients. Also, when the patient recovers from the underlying disease, clinical judgement should be employed to decide whether, and to what extent, further cardiological evaluation is indicated.
Keywords: 
cardiac troponins
;  
non-cardiac conditions
;  
prognosis
Subject: 
Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems

Introduction

Cardiac troponins T and I (cTnT and cTnI) are regulatory proteins located in cardiomyocytes that are released when cardiomyocyte injury occurs. Since cTnT and cTnI are expressed exclusively in myocardial tissue, their elevated levels in the serum are considered ideal markers for the detection of myocardial injury [1,2]. Myocardial injury can be acute and chronic [3,4]
Acute myocardial injury can be ischemic and non-ischemic and does not always lead to irreversible necrosis with scar formation [3,5]. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one form of acute myocardial injury that is caused exclusively by ischemia. According to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, an elevated cardiac troponin (cTn) level is necessary, but not the only criterion for diagnosing AMI; at least two other criteria in addition to elevated cTn are required for establishing the diagnosis of AMI [4]. When there are sufficient criteria for diagnosing AMI, the next step is to categorize AMI as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI, and then further distinguish it into 5 groups based on the mechanisms of ischemia [1,4,6,7]. Acute myocardial injury is frequently encountered in different clinical conditions, and especially in critically ill patients. Although elevated cTn level in these patients may be caused by myocardial ischemia due to severe anemia or hypoxemia (the so-called type II AMI), it is most often caused by non-ischemic acute myocardial injury. Regardless of the cause, an elevated cTn level in acute myocardial injury is characterized by a rise and fall in the cTn level (the so-called dynamic change) [1,4].
Chronic myocardial injury can be found in some chronic conditions/diseases. It is characterized by a constant small increase (above the reference value) in the serum cTn level, and the absence of dynamic change [1,4,8,9].
Emergency departments and intensive care units often test cTn values independently of patients' symptoms or other clinical characteristics. According to data found in literature, testing for cTn is ordered in 16.9% of patients presenting in emergency departments (ED) in the United States. However, chest pain or chest pain equivalent symptoms account for approximately 5.3% of these patients [10]. Also, more than 50% of the said patients with an elevated cTn level are without AMI, suffer from non-ischemic myocardial injury [3,6,11,12]. These data show that it is unnecessary to test cTn in many patients, especially those with low pre-test probability for the presence of coronary artery disease [13,14,15].
Understanding the mechanisms that lead to elevated serum cTn levels is important for the differential diagnosis of myocardial injury. If the increase in cTn is equated with AMI without considering other possible causes, a therapeutic problem may arise. Therapies approved for AMI are very often contraindicated and may actually harm patients with certain diagnoses, such as peptic ulcer, severe anemia, or intracranial hemorrhage. Also, by focusing solely on the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, the presence of another disease or condition that requires specific treatment, and wherein an increase in cTn, i.e., a non-ischemic myocardial injury, has occurred, may be overlooked. Although elevated cTn levels often present interpretative challenges in patients with non-cardiac and multifactorial conditions, an increased cTn value can almost always be correctly interpreted and explained through careful clinical evaluation of the patient [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23].
This review aims to present the most important pathophysiological mechanisms leading to myocardial injury and the increase in serum cTn concentration, as well as to discuss the significance of elevated cTn unrelated to myocardial infarction in different non-cardiac conditions.

Mechanism of cTn Release into the Serum

Troponins are present in cardiomyocytes at two sites – in the contractile apparatus and in the cytosol of the cell, where only a small portion (about 5%-8%) can be found. The cytosolic cTn pool, which is weakly bound to myofilaments, is called the easily releasable pool. From this easily releasable pool, cTn is readily released into the serum during normal cellular turnover (regeneration and renewal of myocardial cells), in conditions that increase cell membrane permeability (such as hypothyroidism), during myocardial strain or stress, and under strong sympathetic stimulation via beta-adrenergic receptors. The release of cTn from the easily releasable pool during normal cell turnover accounts for the small amount of circulating cTn (within the cut-off values) found in the serum of healthy individuals [2,24,25,26]. Mildly elevated cTn levels during minor, reversible myocardial injuries wherein the cell membrane remains intact (the so-called leakage) arise due to the activation of the calcium-sensitive protease – calpain, which degrades cTn into smaller fragments. These degradation products, due to their reduced size may exit from cells more easily and rapidly than the intact cTn molecule. Clinical conditions causing leakage of cTn from cardiomyocytes can sometimes lead to transient myocardial dysfunction [3,25,26,27,28]. Also, calpain activation may explain the modest and persistent elevation of cTn in serum which occurs in patients with systemic inflammatory processes [1,24].
If the process of myocardial tissue injury continues, in the next phase, degradation of the contractile apparatus (sarcomere) and cell necrosis occur, and a smaller or larger scar may form. Myofibrils are repeating units of Ca2+-activated ATP consuming sarcomere and constitute 50-60% of cardiomyocyte volume. If Ca2+ leaks in the cytoplasm, as a consequence of myocardial cell injury, the sarcomeres contract and consume all ATP resulting in cardiomyocyte cell necrosis and release of cTn with other cellular contents [29].
Every acute myocardial injury is accompanied by a dynamic change in serum cTn levels (baseline value vs. subsequent value). An expert consensus group has recommended that serial changes greater than 20% be used to define significant change (e.g., cTn dynamics) [4,17]. An elevated serum cTn level usually is detected 7-14 days after acute myocardial injury, but it may persist for 7-21 days (so called troponin kinetics). This is particularly true when there is a larger zone of myocardial necrosis and/or when myocardial blood flow is not adequate [1,2]. There is no significant difference in cTn kinetics between patients with AMI and patients with acute non-ischemic myocardial injury [30]. Only in cases, when there are scattered small zones of acute myocardial injury, elevated serum cTn levels may be detected only a few days (and sometimes only 24 hours) after the injury [2].
In conditions that lead to chronic myocardial injury, the dominant source of serum cTn is the easily releasable pool, while a significantly smaller amount is released through the degradation of the contractile apparatus, resulting in so-called micro-necroses without scar formation. In chronic myocardial injury, serum cTn levels are constant, i.e., without dynamic change, and can be continuously detected [4].
Finally, released into the bloodstream cardiac troponins or their fragments circulate some time and then they are eliminated. The exact mechanism for cTn elimination is not completely understood, but it probably include: reticuloendothelial system, cleavage of cTn molecules by proteolytic enzymes directly in the bloodstream and elimination through glomerular filtration. There are also some data that cTnT and I are eliminated across blood-salvary barriers. However, the specific mechanism is not determined, but this can be the explanation for elevated cTn concentration in the oral fluid in patients with AMI [24].

Basic Facts about Laboratory Detection of cTn in the Serum

High-sensitivity cTn assays (hs-Tn) for determining the troponin level are recommended by guidelines as they are more sensitive than standard assays; they allow detecting very low, but diagnostically significant concentrations of cTn molecules in the blood serum [4,17,31,32,33,34]. High-sensitivity Tn assays differ from many other laboratory assays in that the assay-specific 99th percentile for healthy population, rather than a precisely defined upper cut-off value, serves as the diagnostic cut-off value for myocardial injury. Cardiac troponin levels in the serum concentration less than 99th percentile are considered as normal myocardial metabolites [24]. The upper cut-off value, i.e., the 99th percentile for healthy individuals, indicates that, at the time it was defined, it excluded individuals with any cardiovascular or other diseases and conditions (including well-managed hypertension, smoking, use of various medications, etc.) and that it differs for each assay. There is some evidence that the 99th percentile value in the healthy population may vary depending on age and sex; however, adjusting the reference limits by age or sex is not currently recommended, either in the biochemical or clinical approach [21,35].
Biochemical evidence indicates that injuries and diseases of the aorta and smooth muscle organs, such as those of the gastrointestinal system, urinary bladder and skelethal muscle disorders, can lead to the release of proteins into the serum that are detected as cTnT in laboratory tests. This explains elevated cTnT levels in cases of aortic dissection, bladder injury, ileus, and similar conditions [1,2,4,36]. On the other hand, increases in cTnI values have not been reported following the injury of non-cardiac tissues (the so-called cTnT/I mismatch) [4].
Finally, (rarely) falsely elevated cTn levels in the serum can be detected in the laboratory and there are few reasons for this. Biological interference in otherwise healthy individuals may occur if so-called macrotroponins or heterophilic autoantibodies are present in the serum. The presence of these molecules shifts the 99th percentile value for the healthy population toward higher levels. Routine testing for these autoantibodies is not recommended, except in cases of repeatedly mildly elevated hs-Tn values without clinical explanation [5,23,35]. The presence of rheumatoid factor in serum is detected in around 5% of healthy persons. Approximately 1% of healthy persons with positive rheumatoid factor in serum have elevated cTnI solely because of the rheumatoid factor and using rheumatoid-blocking agents can be used if this situation is suspected. Excess fibrin is another reason for falsely elevated cTnI levels. There are three possible biochemical approaches to correct this interference: heparinizing the tubes before analysis, removing excess fibrin by repeating centrifugation and adding specific serum which contains protamine sulfate, thrombin and snake venom [5]. Interference with microparticles can also be avoided with repeated centrifugation. And finally, the malfunction of the analyzer can cause falsely elevated cTn levels [5]. The reasons for genuinely and falsely elevated cTn levels in the serum are shown in Table 1.
There are different assays for measuring hs-cTnI and one for measuring hs-cTnT levels. The analytical sensitivity (limit of detection) of hs-cTnI and hs-nT assays varies 10-fold, and values from one assay cannot be directly compared with those from another assay. Also, values may differ between assay generation or changes can even occur when the same assay reagents are measured on different instruments. Although there are biochemical differences among them, in clinical practice, there are no significant differences, and detection of both hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT is used equally in everyday clinical practice, except in specific (and already known) clinical conditions such as skelethal muscle disorders/diseases in which hs-cTnI level should be determined to check if weather heart is also involved [4].

Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Clinical Conditions Other than AMI Causing Genuinely hs-cTn Elevation

Acute and chronic clinical conditions that cause elevated cTn levels are presented in Table 2. They can be classified as cardiac conditions (other than acute myocardial ischemia) and other non-cardiac and multifactorial conditions. Non-ischemic myocardial injury in all of these diseases/conditions may result from a single pathophysiological mechanism, but more often arises from a combination of several mechanisms. Although elevated cTn levels in the serum reflect acute and chronic myocardial cell injury, they do not indicate the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms [4]. Non-cardiac conditions wherein cTn elevation can be found are presented in Table 2.
Table 2. Reasons for laboratory detection of elevated hs-cTn in the serum (above 99th percentile).
Table 2. Reasons for laboratory detection of elevated hs-cTn in the serum (above 99th percentile).
Genuinely elevated
cTn leakage from the easily releasable pool
Release from the myofibril-bound troponin pool (apoptosis, necrosis)
False positive/elevated
Presence of heterophilic antibodies in the serum
Rheumatoid factor in the serum
Microparticles
Hemolysis
Elevated alkaline phosphatase
Fibrin clot in the serum
Malfunction of the analyzer
Table 3. Non-cardiac conditions that can present with genuinely elevated cTn levels (unrelated to myocardial infarction).
Table 3. Non-cardiac conditions that can present with genuinely elevated cTn levels (unrelated to myocardial infarction).
Critically ill patients
Sepsis/septic shock/systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)
Acute pancreatitis
Burns (affecting >30% of body surface area)
Acute brain injury – ischemic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage
Chronic kidney disease
Acute kidney injury
Hyper- or hypothyroidism
Strenuous exercise
Neuromuscular disease (only cTnT)
Myositis (only cTnT)
Rhabdomyolysis (only cTnT)
Table 4. Mechanisms of non-ischemic myocardial injury that lead to cTn elevation in conditions presented in Table 2 .
Table 4. Mechanisms of non-ischemic myocardial injury that lead to cTn elevation in conditions presented in Table 2 .
Direct cell damage
Catecholamine excess (via beta1-adrenergic receptors)
Increased ventricular wall tension and strain
Myocyte trauma

Sepsis and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition characterized by a dysregulated immune response to infection, leading to multiple organ dysfunction, including cardiac involvement [37]. According to data from the literature, elevated serum hs-cTn levels are found in 36% to 85% of patients admitted to hospital with sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). The varying prevalence of patients with elevated cTn values is most likely due to differences in the causative agents of sepsis, the varying degrees of immune response, and the use of different laboratory assays for determining serum cTn levels (high-sensitivity or standard assays) [37].
Information on chest pain is often unobtainable in patients with sepsis/SIRS (patients on mechanical ventilation, sedated patients, patients with delirium, etc.), and transient ECG changes, most commonly T-wave abnormalities, may be present. Although it is possible for a patient with sepsis/SIRS to develop AMI, in almost all patients with elevated cTn values after completion of sepsis treatment, angiography has excluded the presence of significant coronary artery disease. These findings indicate that acute myocardial injury in sepsis and/or SIRS is predominantly of non-ischemic origin [25].
Non-ischemic acute myocardial injury in sepsis/SIRS may occur for several reasons [1,11,25]. Elevated levels of circulating catecholamines and inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and interleukin-6 (IL-6), can cause the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS interact with phospholipids in cell membranes, altering membrane permeability and promoting the extracellular leakage of cytosolic proteins. Inflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha, IL-1, IL-6 cause degradation free cTn in cytosol (calpain activation) to low molecular-weights fragments, which are then released into systemic circulation through highly permeable cell membrane of cardiac myocytes [38]. The detection of these small cTn fragments may be the explanation of troponinemia in the absence of myocyte necrosis [1]. Furthermore, IL-6, TNF-α, and catecholamines induce a hypercatabolic state, stimulating muscle fiber proteolysis and necrosis, most notably in skeletal muscle but also in cardiac myocytes, thereby contributing to overall catabolic stress. TNF-α can also cause cardiomyocyte apoptosis [38]. Bacterial endotoxins may exert direct cardiotoxic and/or cardiodepressive effects [39,40]. In addition, due to hemodynamic alterations, patients with sepsis/SIRS experience significant myocardial mechanical stretch, which can also increase cell membrane permeability without causing necrosis [4,7]. Finally, acute kidney injury (AKI) and exacerbation of chronic kidney disease, through their specific pathophysiological mechanisms, can lead to myocardial injury accompanied by cTn release [1].
Patients exhibiting elevated cTn levels during sepsis or SIRS are frequently found to develop sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. This condition is characterized by a spectrum of cardiac abnormalities, including left ventricular dilation, a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with normal or increased filling pressures, and right ventricular dysfunction. In a study involving 58 consecutive patients admitted to the ICU with sepsis, all individuals with an LVEF <45% demonstrated elevated cTn levels, with higher concentrations observed in those with a more severely reduced LVEF [37].
The therapeutic approach for patients with sepsis/SIRS, elevated cTn, and sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy primarily involves treating sepsis using evidence-based, guideline-directed therapy. Cardiological treatment is based on providing recommended treatments for any complications that may develop (e.g., heart failure, arrhythmias, etc.) [1]. Myocardial function usually recovers within 7-10 days if the underlying condition is resolved [4,39,40].

Elevated cTn Levels in Acute Neurological Conditions

Acute brain injury, including ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage, may lead to elevated cTn levels as a result of acute myocardial injury [41,42,43,44,45]. Elevated cTn levels are observed in 30%-60% of patients during the early phase of ischemic stroke and also in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage [41,42]. Although official guidelines recommend measuring cTn levels in all patients with stroke, there are no clear guidelines on how to manage patients with elevated cTn, or which further diagnostic workup, if any, should be performed [45].
Several reasons can lead to elevated cTn levels in patients with acute brain injury: acute non-ischemic myocardial injury as part of stroke-heart syndrome, acute myocardial infarction (given that ischemic stroke and coronary artery disease share almost identical risk factors) and stress-induced cardiomyopathy (Takotsubo syndrome) [43]. However, coronary angiographic findings have shown that only a small percentage of patients with ischemic stroke and elevated cTn have significant coronary artery stenoses, indicating that the majority of cases are due to (non-ischemic) stroke-associated myocardial injury [42,45].
The most frequently observed pathophysiological mechanisms leading to stroke-associated myocardial injury are the following: a catecholamine surge caused by centrally mediated release of catecholamines in response to hypoperfusion of the posterior hypothalamus, and neurogenic cardiac damage in patients with stroke affecting the insular cortex, which plays a central role in the autonomic control of cardiac function [1,44]. Brain regions associated with specific cTnT elevations include the right posterior, superior, and medial insula, as well as the right inferior parietal lobe. Excessive catecholamine (and cortisol) levels lead to increased sarcoplasmic calcium influx, resulting in consecutive hypercontraction of sarcomeres, metabolic and oxidative stress, and electrical instability. There are also inflammatory responses associated with stroke. All these pathological processes can induce cardiomyocyte apoptosis, contraction band necrosis and an interstitial inflammatory reaction in the myocardial tissue. Cardiac dysfunction, including transient wall motion abnormalities (other than stress-induced Takotsubo cardiomyopathy) and reduced ejection fraction (EF), is frequently observed in patients with acute stroke and other severe acute neurological conditions who have dynamic elevations of cTn [46].
Elevated cTn levels in patients with acute brain injury should always be interpreted with caution, and conclusions regarding the potential cause should be made only after a multidisciplinary assessment of the patient. Such an approach is absolutely necessary in this patient population because dual antiplatelet therapy carries a risk of secondary intracerebral hemorrhage in patients with ischemic stroke, and in young patients with intracranial hemorrhage who have a very low likelihood of coronary artery disease, the use of antiplatelet therapy is absolutely contraindicated [1,43]. Therapeutic options for this form of acute myocardial injury lack scientific evidence and are limited to symptomatic treatment [46].

Troponin Elevation in Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)

Reduced kidney function, whether due to chronic kidney disease (CKD) or the development of acute kidney injury (AKI), is of particular importance when interpreting elevated cTn levels. It has been reported that over 50% of patients with severe CKD and over 75% of hemodialysis patients have elevated serum cTn of varying degrees. The mechanisms of cTn elevation are complex and, beyond reduced cTn clearance, likely include left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial stretch, cardiomyocyte apoptosis, or direct toxic effects on cardiac and skeletal muscles associated with the uremic state [47,48,49]. Two studies found that cTn in serum in patients with CKD only existed in the free intact form (and not in the fragmented version) [50,51].
Numerous studies have shown a correlation between serum cTn levels and serum creatinine levels [33]. Furthermore, according to the majority of published analyses, in hemodialysis patients, cTn levels do not depend on the timing of dialysis, i.e., significant decreases or normalization of cTn are not observed after hemodialysis. Although some data indicate that cTn levels may slightly drop after hemodialysis, they do not reach the normal baseline values (defined by the 99th percentile of the healthy population) [2,47]. The methodology and type of dialysis may influence cTn levels by either resulting in more cardiac injury or actually cleaning cTn molecules or fragmenting them, so they are no longer recognizable for laboratory assays [47].
In patients on hemodialysis, it has been observed that the elevation of cTnT levels is more frequent than the elevation of cTnI levels. This can be explained by a specific mechanism: cTnI, but not cTnT, adheres to the dialyzer membrane during hemodialysis. This phenomenon was first described with polysulfone dialyzer membranes, and since these membranes are not the only type used for hemodialysis, it suggests that cTnI may also adhere to other types of synthetic dialysis membranes [3,5].
In addition to the kidneys, cTn can also be eliminated extrarenally via the reticuloendothelial system (RES) via scavenger receptors. Since not all patients with CKD have elevated cTn levels, and because the levels of elevated cTn vary among patients (with some showing higher and others lower values), it is believed that individual patients have differing extrarenal clearance via scavenger receptors. This phenomenon is likely due to genetic variations in scavenger receptors, and its significance remains a subject of further research [2].

Strenuous Exercise

Elevated cTnT and cTnI levels can be detected after strenuous and ultra-endurance exercise (e.g., long-distance running or triathlon) in almost all individuals (professional athletes and amateur runners or triathletes) [24,25,33,52,53]. Higher cTn levels have been registered in marathon runners who were men, older age and had less athletic experience. Also, the degree of hs-cTn elevation was related to the intensity and duration of physical exertion [32].
It has been reported that elevated cTn levels upon intense exercise decline rapidly, 24 hours after rest, and faster than cTn elevations caused by other forms of acute myocardial injury. The initially proposed mechanisms include increased myocardial stress/strain with “leakage” of cTn from the easily releasable pool through intact cell membranes, excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, acid-base imbalance and passive transport of cTn from intracellular to extracellular compartment, although the possibility of cardiomyocyte injury leading to apoptosis has also been suggested [25,33,52,53]. In addition to these mechanisms, so-called transient ischemic acute myocardial injury may also occur due to extremely high myocardial oxygen demand during strenuous exercise. The kinetics of cTn levels in serum after strenuous exercise differ from the kinetics seen in acute myocardial injury from other causes: after physical activity, elevated cTn levels persist for only 1-3 days [32].

Skeletal Muscle Disorders

In inflammatory skeletal muscle diseases, as well as in rhabdomyolysis, elevated cTnT levels can be detected in over 85% of patients, whereas cTnI levels are rarely registered. The initial explanation for these findings was that older cTnT laboratory assays exhibited cross-reactivity with certain troponin T epitopes released from skeletal muscle. However, even with the refinement of laboratory assays and the introduction of hs-cTnT, elevated cTn levels are still being detected in the absence of myocardial injury [54].
It is believed that the specific mechanism leading to the detection of hs-cTnT involves re-expression of the TNNT2 gene, which encodes cTnT in skeletal muscles that exhibit active disease on biopsy, as well as during tissue repair. This leads to the conclusion that an elevated cTnT level in patients with skeletal muscle disorders is genuine, i.e., it is not falsely elevated. However, the presence of a cTnT/I mismatch indicates that the source of the elevated cTnT is not myocardial tissue. This is why cTnI measurement is recommended for diagnosing myocardial injury in patients with skeletal muscle diseases and/or rhabdomyolysis [54].

The Clinical Significance of cTn Elevation in Patients with Non-Cardiac Diseases

Critically ill patients and patients with sepsis/SIRS who have elevated cTn levels usually present with multiple comorbidities and a higher Charlson comorbidity index compared with patients with the same conditions but without elevated cTn. Their hemodynamic status is worse, in the sense of more frequent hypotension, tachycardia, and hypoxemia. On ECG, atrial fibrillation or nonspecifically prolonged QRS complexes are more commonly observed [12,16].
Elevated cTn in critically ill patients and those with sepsis/SIRS reflects the severity of the underlying disease and serves as an independent predictor of both in-hospital and long-term mortality [6,11,16,20,29,33,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]. In a study by Lim et al., cTn was elevated in 43% of non-cardiac ICU patients, and these patients had a 250% higher mortality compared with patients without elevated cTn levels [61]. In patients with sepsis/SIRS, thirty-day mortality was four times higher in those with elevated cTn levels, as compared to patients whose cTn levels were within the reference range [57]. This finding is expected, as elevated cTn in patients with sepsis indicates the development of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. Since elevated cTn is a biomarker of poor prognosis in critically ill patients, the question has been raised regarding the practical application of this finding and the use of cTn in improving risk stratification for these patients. Studies have shown that higher cTn levels are associated with increased Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU [16,26]. These findings initially suggested that incorporating elevated cTn levels might improve risk prediction models for critically ill patients [33,59,60,61,62] . However, adding cTnI values to the APACHE II score did not enhance its predictive performance [26]. Given the cost of testing and the lack of additional benefit compared to existing prediction models, routine measurement of cTn in all ICU patients is not recommended. If there is any suspicion of developing cardiac complications in critically ill patients – such as unexplained hemodynamic instability or the occurrence of arrhythmias – measuring serum cTn levels is justified, since these patients may benefit from closer hemodynamic monitoring, more aggressive treatment of the underlying condition, and the introduction of cardiac medications such as beta-blockers or ACE inhibitors, when clinically feasible [26].
In patients with ischemic stroke, elevated cTn levels are associated with poorer functional outcomes, more than a twofold increase in mortality, and a higher risk of major cardiovascular events during both short- and long-term follow-up. Moreover, elevated hs-cTn levels are also linked to the degree of severity of cerebral small vessel disease and impaired cognitive function. Elevated cTn level in patients with acute ischemic stroke may be associated with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and is also an independent predictor for mortality [46]. Similar findings are reported among patients with subarachnoidal hemorrhage. One retrospective study of 617 consecutive patients showed increased mortality in patients with elevated cTnI level (as compared with patients with no cTnI elevation) [63]. All patients with elevated cTn and ischemic stroke should undergo 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring and echocardiography. Given that patients with ischemic stroke are generally at high risk of cardiovascular disease, they require continued follow-up by both a cardiologist and a neurologist. A similar approach is recommended for patients with intracranial hemorrhage and elevated hs-cTn levels [42].
In patients with CKD, persistently elevated hs-cTn is a predictor of many adverse events, including incident heart failure, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality [33]. Previous analyses have demonstrated the negative prognostic impact of elevated cTn levels in patients with CKD and a significant correlation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction [44]. The large National Institutes of Health (NIH)-sponsored multicenter Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study, which included 3,243 well-characterized subjects, provided the most definitive data regarding baseline hs-cTnT levels, their cross-sectional associations with cardiovascular risk factors, echocardiographic evidence of cardiac abnormalities, and longitudinal outcomes [64,65,66,67]. In this cohort, hs-cTnT was detectable in 84% of CKD patients; higher levels were strongly and independently associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and, to a lesser extent, with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, as assessed by echocardiography [64]. Longitudinal outcomes from the recently published CRIC study showed increased incident heart failure (adjusted HR 4.77, 95% CI 2.49-9.14) when comparing patients with normal hs-cTnT levels to those in the highest quartile of hs-cTnT after a median follow-up of six years [63,64]. These findings confirmed the results from the earlier large PREVEND observational study involving 1,505 patients, mostly with mild CKD, which reported similar findings, although it lacked detailed structural cardiac data apart from LVH defined by ECG criteria. In the PREVEND study, elevated hs-cTnT remained a significant prognostic marker of cardiovascular events, after adjustment for demographics, kidney function, urinary albumin excretion, cardiovascular risk factors, and ECG abnormalities [66,67]. Additionally, in patients undergoing kidney transplantation, elevated pre-transplant cTn levels have been shown to correlate with an increased risk of post-transplant mortality and adverse cardiovascular events, independent of other risk factors [68]. Overall, cardiac troponins can be valuable in the management of CKD patients by aiding in more accurate cardiovascular risk stratification [32].
The diagnostic value of elevated cTn levels following physical exertion remains controversial, and discussions on this topic are still ongoing. Elevated cTn levels after intense exercise is more likely to reflect the heart adaptation to significant and prolonged physical exertion, rather than permanent cardiac damage [52,53]. Studies suggest that the rise in cTn is caused by transient myocardial injury, as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium-based contrast agents has shown no evidence of cardiomyocyte necrosis and fibrosis with scar formation [33,52]. However, as a result of repeated episodes of myocardial injury and insufficient recovery (in professional athletes), progressive myocardial remodeling may occur [52]. Detailed cardiological evaluations performed after ultra-endurance physical activity have revealed structural cardiac changes in many athletes, and, less frequently, previously undiagnosed coronary artery disease in older professional athletes (above the age of 35) who had previously been considered healthy. As such, any elevation of cTn following physical activity should be thoroughly investigated. The patient should be briefly hospitalized to allow for the possible detection of subclinical heart disease that may have become unmasked as a result of intense physical exertion [25,33,52].
Finally, studies have found that elevated baseline cTnT levels and changes in cTnT levels measured with a highly sensitive assay are also significantly associated with incident HF and cardiovascular death in the general population, and in older people without previous cardiovascular disease [31,32,33,69].

Conclusion

Myocardial injury accompanied by significant hs-cTn elevation is often detected in patients with non-cardiac and multifactorial conditions. Numerous mechanisms other than ischemia can lead to acute myocardial injury in such cases. Therefore, an elevated cTn level should not be regarded as synonymous with acute myocardial infarction. A thorough understanding of the pathophysiology of cTn release is an essential prerequisite for minimizing unnecessary, costly, and potentially risky (cardiac) interventions, while ensuring timely and appropriate medical care directed toward the primary (underlying) condition or disease. Elevated cTn in critically ill patients, in patients with chronic disease/conditions, is a risk factor for cardiovascular and overall mortality. Treatment of the underlying condition or disease remains the primary priority, and close monitoring for the development of cardiovascular complications during hospitalization should be considered in these patients. Furthermore, once the patient has recovered from the underlying illness, clinical judgment should be employed to determine whether, and to what extent, additional cardiologic evaluation is indicated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.S. and S.S; data curation L.S. and S.S. writing—original draft preparation, L.S., R.L. and D.M.; writing—review and editing, M.A. and N.-A.visualization, L.S. and G.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

not applicable

Informed Consent Statement

not applicable

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable since no new data were recorded or analyzed in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors report that there are no competing interests to declare.

References

  1. Sternberg, M.; Pasini, E.; Chen-Scarabelli, C.; Corsetti, G.; Patel, H.; Linardi, D.; et al. Elevated Cardiac Troponin in Clinical Scenarios Beyond Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease. Med Sci Monit 2019, 25, 7115–7125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hammarsten, O.; Mair, J.; Möckel, M.; Lindahl, B.; Jaffe, A.S. Possible mechanisms behind cardiac troponin elevations. Biomarkers 2018, 23, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Park, K.C.; Gaze, D.C.; Collinson, P.O.; Marber, M.S. Cardiac troponins: from myocardial infarction to chronic disease. Cardiovasc Res 2017, 113, 1708–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Thygesen, K.; Alpert, J.S.; Jaffe, A.S.; Chaitman, B.R.; Bax, J.J.; Morrow, D.A.; et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J 2019, 40, 237–269. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Roongsritong, C.; Warraich, I.; Bradley, C. Common causes of troponin elevations in the absence of acute myocardial infarction: incidence and clinical significance. Chest 2004, 125, 1877–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Meigher, S.; Thode, H.C.; Peacock, W.F.; Bock, J.L.; Gruberg, L.; Singer, A.J. Causes of Elevated Cardiac Troponins in the Emergency Department and Their Associated Mortality. Acad Emerg Med 2016, 23, 1267–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chapman, A.R.; Taggart, C.; Boeddinghaus, J.; Mills, N.L.; Fox, K.A.A. Type 2 myocardial infarction: challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Eur Heart J 2025, 46, 504–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, X.Y.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, C.; Zheng, L.R.; Yang, J. The Biomarkers for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure. Biomed Res Int 2020, 2020, 2018035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wildi, K.; Twerenbold, R.; Mueller, C. How acute changes in cardiac troponin concentrations help to handle the challenges posed by troponin elevations in non-ACS-patients. Clin Biochem. 2015, 48, 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Makam, A.N.; Nguyen, O.K. Use of cardiac biomarker testing in the emergency department. JAMA Intern Med 2015, 175, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Oh, A.R.; Lee, S.H.; Park, J.; Choi, D.C.; Yang, K. Association between cardiac troponin testing at scheduled admission and mortality in patients with comorbidities. Ann Transl Med 2023, 11, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bardají, A.; Cediel, G.; Carrasquer, A.; de Castro, R.; Sánchez, R.; Boqué, C. Troponin elevation in patients without acute coronary syndrome. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2015, 68, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fihn, S.D.; Gardin, J.M.; Abrams, J.; Berra, K.; Blankenship, J.C.; Dallas, A.P.; et al.; American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2012, 126, e354–e471. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Newby, L.K.; Jesse, R.L.; Babb, J.D.; Christenson, R.H.; De Fer, T.M.; Diamond, G.A.; et al. ACCF 2012 expert consensus document on practical clinical considerations in the interpretation of troponin elevations: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation task force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012, 60, 2427–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Penumetsa, S.C.; Mallidi, J.; Friderici, J.L.; Hiser, W.; Rothberg, M.B. Outcomes of patients admitted for observation of chest pain. Arch Intern Med 2012, 172, 873–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Akbas, T. Elevated Cardiac Troponin Levels as a Predictor of Increased Mortality Risk in Non-Cardiac Critically Ill Patients Admitted to a Medical Intensive Care Unit. J Clin Med 2024, 13, 6025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mair, J.; Lindahl, B.; Müller, C.; Giannitsis, E.; Huber, K.; Möckel, M.; Plebani, M.; Thygesen, K.; Jaffe, A.S. What to do when you question cardiac troponin values. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2018, 7, 577–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wildi, K.; Gimenez, M.R.; Twerenbold, R.; Reichlin, T.; Jaeger, C.; Heinzelmann, A.; et al. Misdiagnosis of Myocardial Infarction Related to Limitations of the Current Regulatory Approach to Define Clinical Decision Values for Cardiac Troponin. Circulation 2015, 131, 2032–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wildi, K.; Gimenez, M.R.; Boeddinghaus, J.; Nestelberger, T.; Lopez-Ayala, P.; Koechlin, L.; et al. Possible Misdiagnosis of Myocardial Infarction Using Regulatory-Approved and Close-to-Bioequivalent Upper Limits of Normal for Cardiac Troponin. J Am Heart Assoc 2025, 14, e040468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nseir, M.; Mokhtari, A.; Stanisic, M.; Ekström, U.; Labaf, A. Validation and correlation of high-sensitive troponin I and troponin T in the emergency department. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2024, 24, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sayed Masri, S.N.N.; Basri, F.; Yunus, S.N.; Cheah, S.K. Cardiac Troponin as a Prognostic Indicator for Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025, 15, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Netala, V.R.; Hou, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Teertam, S.K. Cardiovascular Biomarkers: Tools for Precision Diagnosis and Prognosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025, 26, 3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Salvatici, M.; Sommese, C.; Corsi Romanelli, M.M.; Drago, L. Review of Literature and Recommended Procedures for Management of Unusual Cases of False Positive Troponin Tests. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025, 26, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chaulin, A.M. Cardiac Troponins Metabolism: From Biochemical Mechanisms to Clinical Practice (Literature Review). Int J Mol Sci 2021, 22, 10928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zaki, H.A.; Shaban, A.E.; Shaban, A.E.; Shaban, E.E. Interpretation of Cardiac and Non-Cardiac Causes of Elevated Troponin T Levels in Non-Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients in the Emergency Department. Cureus 2022, 14, e22703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cole, E.M.; Docherty, A.B. Troponin in critical care patients and outcomes. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2020, 81, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sandoval, Y.; Jaffe, A.S. Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019, 73, 1846–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Morrow, D.A.; Cannon, C.P.; Jesse, R.L.; Newby, L.K.; Ravkilde, J.; Storrow, A.B.; et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Clinical characteristics and utilization of biochemical markers in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2007, 115, e356–e75. [Google Scholar]
  29. Piper, H.M.; Meuter, K.; Schäfer, C. Cellular mechanisms of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Ann Thorac Surg 2003, 75, S644–S648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wereski, R.; Kimenai, D.M.; Taggart, C.; Doudesis, D.; Lee, K.K.; Lowry, M.T.H.; et al. Cardiac Troponin Thresholds and Kinetics to Differentiate Myocardial Injury and Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2021, 144, 528–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. van der Linden, N.; Klinkenberg, L.J.J.; Bekers, O.; Loon, L.J.C.V.; Dieijen-Visser, M.P.V.; Zeegers, M.P.; et al. Prognostic value of basal high-sensitive cardiac troponin levels on mortality in the general population: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016, 95, e5703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. McEvoy, J.W.; Daya, N.; Tang, O.; Fang, M.; Ndumele, C.E.; Coresh, J.; Christenson, R.H.; Selvin, E. High-sensitivity troponins and mortality in the general population. Eur Heart J 2023, 44, 2595–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Aimo, A.; Georgiopoulos, G.; Panichella, G.; Vergaro, G.; Passino, C.; Emdin, M.; et al. High-sensitivity troponins for outcome prediction in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med 2022, 98, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chauin, A. The Main Causes and Mechanisms of Increase in Cardiac Troponin Concentrations Other Than Acute Myocardial Infarction (Part 1): Physical Exertion, Inflammatory Heart Disease, Pulmonary Embolism, Renal Failure, Sepsis. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2021, 17, 601–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aakre, K.M.; Saenger, A.K.; Body, R.; Collinson, P.; Hammarsten, O.; Jaffe, A.S.; et al. Analytical Considerations in Deriving 99th Percentile Upper Reference Limits for High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assays: Educational Recommendations from the IFCC Committee on Clinical Application of Cardiac Bio-Markers. Clin Chem 2022, 68, 1022–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kajioka, S.; Takahashi-Yanaga, F.; Shahab, N.; Onimaru, M.; Matsuda, M.; Takahashi, R.; et al. Endogenous cardiac troponin T modulates Ca(2+)-mediated smooth muscle contraction. Sci Rep. 2012, 2, 979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shvilkina, T.; Shapiro, N. Sepsis-Induced myocardial dysfunction: heterogeneity of functional effects and clinical significance. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023, 10, 1200441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pasini, E.; Corsetti, G.; Aquilani, R.; Romano, C.; Picca, A.; Calvani, R.; et al. Protein-Amino Acid Metabolism Disarrangements: The Hidden Enemy of Chronic Age-Related Conditions. Nutrients 2018, 10, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sato, R.; Nasu, M. A review of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. J Intensive Care. 2015, 3, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Antonucci, E.; Fiaccadori, E.; Donadello, K.; Taccone, F.S.; Franchi, F.; Scolletta, S. Myocardial depression in sepsis: from pathogenesis to clinical manifestations and treatment. J Crit Care 2014, 29, 500–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, L.; Wang, Z.; Qi, S. Cardiac Troponin Elevation and Outcome after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015, 24, 2375–2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kruska, M.; Fastner, C.; Scheitz, J.F.; Kolb, A.; Rutsch, M.; Papavassiliu, T.; et al. Troponinerhöhung beim akuten ischämischen Schlaganfall – unspezifisch oder Ausdruck eines akuten Myokardinfarkts? : Diagnostik und klinische Implikationen [Troponin elevation in acute ischemic stroke-unspecific or acute myocardial infarction? : Diagnostics and clinical implications]. Herz. 2021, 46, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Scheitz, J.F.; Stengl, H.; Nolte, C.H.; Landmesser, U.; Endres, M. Neurological update: use of cardiac troponin in patients with stroke. J Neurol 2021, 268, 2284–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Krishnamoorthy, V.; Mackensen, G.B.; Gibbons, E.F.; Vavilala, M.S. Cardiac Dysfunction After Neurologic Injury: What Do We Know and Where Are We Going? Chest 2016, 149, 1325–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Stengl, H.; Ganeshan, R.; Hellwig, S.; Blaszczyk, E.; Fiebach, J.B.; Nolte, C.H.; et al. Cardiomyocyte Injury Following Acute Ischemic Stroke: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Cohort Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021, 10, e24186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xu, C.; Zheng, A.; He, T.; Cao, Z. Brain-Heart Axis and Biomarkers of Cardiac Damage and Dysfunction after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020, 21, 2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Parikh, R.H.; Seliger, S.L.; deFilippi, C.R. Use and interpretation of high sensitivity cardiac troponins in patients with chronic kidney disease with and without acute myocardial infarction. Clin Biochem 2015, 48, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Long, B.; Belcher, C.N.; Koyfman, A.; Bronner, J.M. Interpreting troponin in renal disease: A narrative review for emergency clinicians. Am J Emerg Med 2020, 38, 990–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cyon, L.; Kadesjö, E.; Edgren, G.; Roos, A. Acute Kidney Injury and High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Levels in the Emergency Department. JAMA Netw Open. 2024, 7, e2419602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bates, K.J.; Hall, E.M.; Fahie-Wilson, M.N.; Kindler, H.; Bailey, C.; Lythall, D.; et al. Circulating immunoreactive cardiac troponin forms determined by gel filtration chromatography after acute myocardial infarction. Clin Chem. 2010, 56, 952–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fahie-Wilson, M.N.; Carmichael, D.J.; Delaney, M.P.; Stevens, P.E.; Hall, E.M.; Lamb, E.J. Cardiac troponin T circulates in the free, intact form in patients with kidney failure. Clin Chem 2006, 52, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Janik, M.; Blachut, D.; Czogalik, Ł.; Tomasik, A.R.; Wojciechowska, C.; Kukulski, T. Adaptive Changes in Endurance Athletes: A Review of Molecular, Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Findings. International Journal of Molecular Science 2025, 26, 8329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wuestenfeld, J.C.; Kastner, T.; Hesse, J.; Fesseler, L.; Frohberg, F.; Rossbach, C.; Wolfarth, B. Differences in Troponin I and Troponin T Release in High-Performance Athletes Outside of Competition. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024, 25, 1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. du Fay de Lavallaz, J.; Prepoudis, A.; Wendebourg, M.J.; Kesenheimer, E.; Kyburz, D.; Daikeler, T.; etal., *!!! REPLACE !!!*. BASEL XII Investigators. Skeletal Muscle Disorders: A Noncardiac Source of Cardiac Troponin T. Circulation 2022, 145, 1764–1779. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Árnadóttir, Á.; Vestergaard, K.R.; Pallisgaard, J.; Sölétormos, G.; Steffensen, R.; Goetze, J.P.; et al. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T is superior to troponin I in the prediction of mortality in patients without acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiol 2018, 259, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kaldal, A.; Tonstad, S.; Jortveit, J. Association of Troponin T measurements with long-term outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease participating in a secondary prevention trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023, 23, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kim, J.S.; Kim, M.; Kim, Y.J.; Ryoo, S.M.; Sohn, C.H.; Ahn, S.; Kim, W.Y. Troponin Testing for Assessing Sepsis-Induced Myocardial Dysfunction in Patients with Septic Shock. J Clin Med. 2019, 8, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Vallabhajosyula, S.; Sakhuja, A.; Geske, J.B.; Kumar, M.; Poterucha, J.T.; Kashyap, R.; et al. Role of Admission Troponin-T and Serial Troponin-T Testing in Predicting Outcomes in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017, 6, e005930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bessière, F.; Khenifer, S.; Dubourg, J.; Durieu, I.; Lega, J.C. Prognostic value of troponins in sepsis: a meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2013, 39, 1181–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lim, W.; Qushmaq, I.; Devereaux, P.J.; Heels-Ansdell, D.; Lauzier, F.; Ismaila, A.S.; Crowther, M.A.; Cook, D.J. Elevated cardiac troponin measurements in critically ill patients. Arch Intern Med 2006, 166, 2446–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Eggers, K.M.; Venge, P.; Lindahl, B.; Lind, L. Cardiac troponin I levels measured with a high-sensitive assay increase over time and are strong predictors of mortality in an elderly population. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013, 61, 1906–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. de Lemos, J.A.; Drazner, M.H.; Omland, T.; Ayers, C.R.; Khera, A.; Rohatgi, A.; etal., *!!! REPLACE !!!*. Association of troponin T detected with a highly sensitive assay and cardiac structure and mortality risk in the general population. JAMA 2010, 304, 2503–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ahmadian, A.; Mizzi, A.; Banasiak, M.; Downes, K.; Camporesi, E.M.; Thompson Sullebarger, J.; Vasan, R.; Mangar, D.; van Loveren, H.R.; Agazzi, S. Cardiac manifestations of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Heart Lung Vessel 2013, 5, 168–178. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. 64. Mishra, R.K.; Li, Y.; DeFilippi, C.; Fischer, M.J.; Yang, W.; Keane, M.; Chen, J.; He, J.; Kallem, R.; Horwitz, E.J.; Rafey, M.; Raj, D.S.; Go, A.S.; Shlipak, M.G. CRICStudy Investigators Association of cardiac troponin Twith left ventricular structure function in, C.K.D. Am J Kidney Dis 2013, 61, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Dubin, R.F.; Li, Y.; He, J.; Jaar, B.G.; Kallem, R.; Lash, J.P.; Makos, G.; Rosas, S.E.; Soliman, E.Z.; Townsend, R.R.; Yang, W.; Go, A.S.; Keane, M.; Defilippi, C.; Mishra, R.; Wolf, M.; Shlipak, M.G.; CRIC Study Investigators. Predictors of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T in chronic kidney disease patients: a cross-sectional study in the chronic renal insufficiency cohort (CRIC). BMC Nephrol. 2013, 14, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bansal, N.; Hyre Anderson, A.; Yang, W.; Christenson, R.H.; deFilippi, C.R.; Deo, R.; Dries, D.L.; Go, A.S.; He, J.; Kusek, J.W.; Lash, J.P.; Raj, D.; Rosas, S.; Wolf, M.; Zhang, X.; Shlipak, M.G.; Feldman, H.I. High-sensitivity troponin T and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and risk of incident heart failure in patients with CKD: the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015, 26, 946–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Scheven, L.; de Jong, P.E.; Hillege, H.L.; Lambers Heerspink, H.J.; van Pelt, L.J.; Kootstra, J.E.; Bakker, S.J.; Gansevoort, R.T.; PREVEND study group. High-sensitive troponin T and N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide are associated with cardiovascular events despite the cross-sectional association with albuminuria and glomerular filtration rate. Eur Heart J 2012, 33, 2272–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Keddis, M.T.; El-Zoghby, Z.M.; El Ters, M.; Rodrigo, E.; Pellikka, P.A.; Jaffe, A.S.; Cosio, F.G. Cardiac troponin T before and after kidney transplantation: determinants and implications for posttransplant survival. Am J Transplant 2013, 13, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. deFilippi, C.R.; de Lemos, J.A.; Christenson, R.H.; Gottdiener, J.S.; Kop, W.J.; Zhan, M.; Seliger, S.L. Association of serial measures of cardiac troponin T using a sensitive assay with incident heart failure and cardiovascular mortality in older adults. JAMA. 2010, 304, 2494–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Mechanisms that lead to cTn elevation in serum.
Table 1. Mechanisms that lead to cTn elevation in serum.
Increased membrane permeability
Myocardial cell necrosis
Myocardial cell apoptosis
Decreased cTn clearance (elimination)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
bsky
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated