Submitted:
14 October 2025
Posted:
15 October 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mattern, O.; Young, A.; Walch, G. Open Latarjet: Tried, Tested and True. Ann. Jt. 2017, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roulet, S.; Borel, F.; Franger, G.; Liotard, J.-P.; Michelet, A.; Godenèche, A. Immediate Self-Rehabilitation after Open Latarjet Procedures Enables Recovery of Preoperative Shoulder Mobility at 3 Months. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. Off. J. ESSKA 2019, 27, 3979–3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- An, V.V.G.; Sivakumar, B.S.; Phan, K.; Trantalis, J. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Two Procedures for Recurrent Traumatic Anterior Instability of the Shoulder: Latarjet Procedure vs. Bankart Repair. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016, 25, 853–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tashjian, R.Z.; Deloach, J.; Porucznik, C.A.; Powell, A.P. Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) for Visual Analog Scales (VAS) Measuring Pain in Patients Treated for Rotator Cuff Disease. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009, 18, 927–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cerciello, S.; Corona, K.; Morris, B.J.; Santagada, D.A.; Maccauro, G. Early Outcomes and Perioperative Complications of the Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Sports Med. 2019, 47, 2232–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rm, F.; B, G.; M, O.; E, B.; Nn, V.; Bj, C.; Gp, N.; Aa, R. Ninety-Day Complications Following the Latarjet Procedure. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hurley, E.T.; Jamal, M.S.; Ali, Z.S.; Montgomery, C.; Pauzenberger, L.; Mullett, H. Long-Term Outcomes of the Latarjet Procedure for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review of Studies at 10-Year Follow-Up. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019, 28, e33–e39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abdul-Rassoul, H.; Galvin, J.W.; Curry, E.J.; Simon, J.; Li, X. Return to Sport After Surgical Treatment for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review. Am. J. Sports Med. 2019, 47, 1507–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beletsky, A.; Cancienne, J.M.; Manderle, B.J.; Mehta, N.; Wilk, K.E.; Verma, N.N. A Comparison of Physical Therapy Protocols Between Open Latarjet Coracoid Transfer and Arthroscopic Bankart Repair. Sports Health 2020, 12, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mazzocca, A.D.; Arciero, R.A.; Shea, K.P.; Apostolakos, J.M.; Solovyova, O.; Gomlinski, G.; Wojcik, K.E.; Tafuto, V.; Stock, H.; Cote, M.P. The Effect of Early Range of Motion on Quality of Life, Clinical Outcome, and Repair Integrity After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. Off. Publ. Arthrosc. Assoc. N. Am. Int. Arthrosc. Assoc. 2017, 33, 1138–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mazuquin, B.F.; Wright, A.C.; Russell, S.; Monga, P.; Selfe, J.; Richards, J. Effectiveness of Early Compared with Conservative Rehabilitation for Patients Having Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Br. J. Sports Med. 2018, 52, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sonoda, Y.; Nishioka, T.; Nakajima, R.; Imai, S.; Vigers, P.; Kawasaki, T. Use of a Shoulder Abduction Brace after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Study on Gait Performance and Falls. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 2018, 42, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barth, J.; Boutsiadis, A.; Neyton, L.; Lafosse, L.; Walch, G. Can a Drill Guide Improve the Coracoid Graft Placement During the Latarjet Procedure? A Prospective Comparative Study With the Freehand Technique. Orthop. J. Sports Med. 2017, 5, 2325967117734218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boutsiadis, A.; Bampis, I.; Swan, J.; Barth, J. Best Implant Choice for Coracoid Graft Fixation during the Latarjet Procedure Depends on Patients’ Morphometric Considerations. J. Exp. Orthop. 2020, 7, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Griesser, M.J.; Harris, J.D.; McCoy, B.W.; Hussain, W.M.; Jones, M.H.; Bishop, J.Y.; Miniaci, A. Complications and Re-Operations after Bristow-Latarjet Shoulder Stabilization: A Systematic Review. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013, 22, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rollick, N.C.; Ono, Y.; Kurji, H.M.; Nelson, A.A.; Boorman, R.S.; Thornton, G.M.; Lo, I.K. Long-Term Outcomes of the Bankart and Latarjet Repairs: A Systematic Review. Open Access J. Sports Med. 2017, 8, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McHale, K.J.; Sanchez, G.; Lavery, K.P.; Rossy, W.H.; Sanchez, A.; Ferrari, M.B.; Provencher, M.T. Latarjet Technique for Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability With Glenoid Bone Loss. Arthrosc. Tech. 2017, 6, e791–e799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]





| Outcome | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 |
| VAS (0–10) | 1.2 ± 0.6 | 0.8 ± 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Forward Flexion (°) | 155 ± 10 | 170 ± 5 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| External Rotation (°) | - | - | 60 ± 5 | 75 ± 4 | 80 ± 3 |
| Internal Rotation Level | - | - | L3 | T7 | T7 |
| Complications | None | None | None | None | None |
| Satisfaction (0–10) | - | - | - | - | 9.5 ± 0.4 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).