4. Results and Discussion
The tax inspection process carried out by the traffic auditor in the state of Goiás until April 2023 presented several control risks. Due to the lack of systemic and technological tools, it depended solely on the experience of each auditor. As observed in
Figure 7, one notes the process of evidencing the mitigation of risks.
Experienced auditors, with years of experience on the road, already possessed the scepticism to suspect situations that lead to tax fraud. Thus, when approaching vehicles, analysing their physical characteristics and documents, they already knew how to use the available desktop systems for research and analysis. Even so, it was often necessary to obtain additional information, which made the process more costly and inefficient, as it depended on other personnel. Due to strategic confidentiality, it will not be possible to present all the details in this study, but we will describe some examples to highlight how the available applications aided the inspection work by introducing new controls that helped mitigate the risks of these controls and tax fraud.
Initially, traffic inspectors chose locations to conduct their operations, and at that location, they would stop vehicles. At that point, they would request tax documents and begin validation. They would ask drivers where they loaded the goods, which route they plied, and if the inspector found anything unusual, they would conduct a more in-depth investigation using the department's systems. However, if they "found" everything to be in order, they would release the vehicle; in other words, the number of validations depended heavily on each inspector. Noteworthy, to consider several points in this process: first, the selection of the vehicle to be inspected was as per
Figure 8.
The degree of complexity of the tax document validation process varied from case to case; evidence regarding the locations the truck actually travelled depended heavily on PRF equipment and systems or on events recorded in the ONE system.
After implementing the mobile app on the auditor's cell phone, the process began to change. As in
Figure 9
Each auditor was given the freedom to choose how they would use the app, but all were trained to understand the tool's full functionality, from the theoretical part to practical operation on the roads using the app. Auditors began using the license plate lookup service. During the operation, they simply entered the license plate number and immediately knew where the vehicle had been traveling. The app displayed which roads it had been on, including a visual map, and also indicated whether any valid tax documents were available at the time the vehicle was driven. Thus, before the driver stopped the vehicle, the inspector already had sufficient data to detect any irregularities or possible fraud. When questioning the driver about the information, they could immediately verify whether the driver was telling the truth, thus reducing the risk of fraud.
Noteworthy to explain that, for ICMS inspections, the actual route a vehicle travelled makes all the difference, as the tax isn't levied on domestic routes, only interstate or intercity routes. Another recurring issue is the reuse of valid tax documents. Drivers often make numerous trips using the same documentation. However, if they do this now, the app will have the entire trip history, as well as alerts in case of trips without a valid tax document. Furthermore, the auditor, with the information at their disposal, can easily detect inconsistencies. For example, a driver may present a tax document indicating that they departed from state X and are going to state Y, but when analysing the tickets in the app, it's possible to see that they never came from X and are traveling in a completely off-route direction solely to reduce the tax burden. Furthermore, it's also possible to consider the time factor, as the trip history allows us to calculate whether the distance travelled matches the estimated time and the route that should have been taken according to the tax document (MDF-e).
One feature that has been widely used is the lists of suspicious license plates that auditors themselves register. In this case, the system acts proactively, generating alerts and notifying auditors when registered vehicles pass through an antenna. This allows for immediate inspection and enforcement. Thus
Figure 10 describes the process.
Note that properly functioning OCR equipment located throughout the state serves as a control system to assist inspectors, functioning as virtual tax offices serving the tax authorities and helping to reduce cases of potential irregularities or tax fraud. Another feature that has expedited inspectors' work is the availability of the Accreditation Form on the mobile app, allowing them to perform the search themselves and verify whether the taxpayer could indeed be driving without paying ICMS in advance, right on the road without having to go to an office, open their laptop, log into the mainframe system, and finally verify this information.
The features implemented in the mobile app were chosen based on development time, impact, and return on investment. Only high-impact, fast-return features were implemented initially. Therefore, within the week the app was released, it already demonstrated significant results for traffic enforcement, and since then, the effectiveness of the enforcement process and the consequent increase in revenue have been notable (
Figure 11).
An important question: is this increase solely due to the app's availability, or were there other factors contributing to this increase? An important point to consider is that there had not been a new public exam for new tax auditors in the state of Goiás for 18 years, and consequently, the number of traffic auditors was very small. In 2018, a new exam appointed approximately 10 new auditors by 2023, increasing the number of auditors specifically for traffic by 50%. These new auditors lacked experience in inspections, so without the tool that was made available, would they have been able, without prior experience, to account for the 85% increase in the number of traffic violation notices? Another important point is that the use of the mobile app depends heavily on the user's ability. Perhaps we can consider that both factors combined were responsible for this success. In other words, the tool, coupled with the user's ability and ease of use and adaptation to mobile applications, contributed to obtaining the maximum return from the tool.
Therefore, the need for and importance of IT tools to help auditors perform their duties in an agile, timely, and effective manner is crucial. It's difficult to believe that in 2023 we'll still be using desktop and client/server tools to perform such a critical and important activity as tax auditing. Another important point that needs to be emphasized is the difficulty in improving an existing application, as the first impression of the application is the one that remains in the users' eyes. Convincing them that the application has changed and is now better much more difficult than creating a new application, even if similar, from scratch, as resistance and previous history are very difficult to overcome.
The key to being assertive and gaining your user's empathy is to understand their needs intimately, as only then will it be possible to offer something truly effective. You need to put yourself in the other person's shoes to create a tool that is truly useful in decision-making. There is no better way.
To overcome user resistance and present the actual changes that were made, the only way was to present the technical side (the application's internal structure), explaining that, although the application appears to be the same, the internals have been completely redesigned. Presenting the internals and providing users with an understanding of the entire process allows them to understand the process and move from being just another critic to becoming a contributor to improving the application and, consequently, improving the auditors' own work. It's about bringing the user, in this case the auditor, into the role of partner, not merely a user of an application that wasn't designed for them and for their own benefit.
It is believed that promoting the app through training was crucial to breaking down the barrier experienced auditors faced with a new tool. Therefore, the training sessions were held in three different locations to facilitate the auditors' transition. This training was sponsored and supported by all the managers who became project partners. The training was divided into two main parts: the theoretical part, which explained everything that had been built and how it worked, as well as real-life cases presented by the traffic auditors themselves, the same ones who participated in the first project meeting; and the practical part, which involved using the app in real-world situations on the roads, demonstrating that it was working, timely, and effective enough for real-world use. The training session was the initial milestone, demonstrating that despite the app's name, it had been completely redesigned internally and was now functioning in real-time, as they needed.
Implementing this tool for tax auditors can even change the way they approach the conductor, demonstrating that the state is using technological solutions to make progress in identifying tax evasion fraud. The tool allows drivers to be approached with a personalized "Good morning." The former approaches used to both scare drivers and demonstrate a more alert inspection team to what's happening on the roads. This all aims to eliminate unfair competition, as a product that arrives in an untrustworthy manner ends up being sold at a lower price than an honest company that pays all its taxes.
Thus, the implementation and use of technological tools by traffic inspectors ensures, according to the legitimacy theory, that their actions are legitimized—that is, their actions are recognized by the public as effective in combating tax evasion. With assertive information, the inspector can demonstrate the legality and accuracy of their approach and, consequently, legitimize the work of tax authorities. The controls implemented by the tax authorities aim to catch recurring frauds that previously escaped more assertive oversight. However, it is important to emphasize that this is a daily struggle, as new ways to circumvent oversight emerge every day. However, with the use of technology, it is possible to quickly, efficiently, and assertively seek new ways to assist tax audits by providing information for an effective approach.
directions may also be highlighted.