Round-Trip Mars Missions in the 2031 Window: Feasible and Extreme Scenarios Derived from CA21-Anchored Trajectories

1. Introduction

(Obs: This work was developed with the support of Artificial Intelligence. The author used the ChatGPT system (OpenAI, 2025) for computational verification and text-structuring assistance, under the author’s direct supervision. All physical insights, analyses, interpretations, conclusions, and theoretical innovations are attributable solely to the author.)

In recent years, the pursuit of faster interplanetary transfers has evolved from purely theoretical optimization toward data-driven trajectory synthesis. Building upon the methodology introduced in Astrodynamics Innovation: Leveraging an Asteroid’s Early Data for Faster Mars Transits [1], the present study extends the concept of asteroid-anchored dynamics to complete round-trip Earth–Mars mission profiles within the 2031 opposition window.

The earlier work demonstrated that the initial orbital solution of the near-Earth asteroid 2001 CA21 (JPL Solution #11, 2015) could serve as a natural geometric template for ultra-fast Mars transfers. By constraining Lambert-based transfer arcs to the orbital plane of CA21, two notable Earth-to-Mars trajectories were identified: a 56-day feasible baseline, requiring $v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus }\approx 16.9~\mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s}$ and $v_{\mathrm{\infty },\backslash mars}\approx 16.6~\mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s}$, and a 33-day energetic case, geometrically valid but demanding $C_3\approx 758 \mathrm{k}{\mathrm{m}}^2/{\mathrm{s}}^2$ , beyond current propulsion capabilities. These results established 2031 as a benchmark alignment for both near-term and aspirational rapid-transit missions.

In this extended analysis, the framework is expanded to compute the return trajectories from Mars to Earth using the same CA21-anchored constraints and high-precision JPL Horizons ephemerides [2,3]. The results reveal two internally consistent round-trip configurations:

-

The rapid scenario (33 + 30 + 90 days), departing Earth on April 20, 2031, arriving at Mars on May 23, departing Mars on June 22, and reaching Earth on September 20, 2031, for a total mission duration of ≈ 153 days. This trajectory represents a high-energy, short-way transfer pair with $v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars,dep}=19.9 \mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s}$ and $v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus ,arr}=16.8 \mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s}.$

-

The feasible scenario (56 + 35 + 135 days), departing Earth on April 20, 2031, arriving at Mars on June 15, departing Mars on July 20, and returning to Earth on December 2, 2031, for a total duration of ≈ 226 days, with moderate energies $v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars,dep}=13.6 \mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s}$and $v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus ,arr}=15.1\mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s}.$

Both trajectories were rigorously validated through full ephemeris analysis, ensuring derivative consistency between position and velocity vectors. The shorter, high-energy mission defines the physical limit for near-term propulsion, while the longer case represents a technologically feasible baseline achievable with hybrid chemical or nuclear-thermal systems.

Together, these results establish the first closed and dynamically reversible Earth–Mars architecture derived from asteroid-based geometry. The outbound trajectories (33 and 56 days) delineate the forward energy frontier, while the return legs (90 and 135 days) confirm that the same CA21-anchored plane supports complete round-trip coherence. This dual validation — both mathematical and physical — positions 2031 as a singular benchmark for testing advanced interplanetary propulsion and mission design.

The following sections present the analytical framework, derivations, and mission-design results, establishing the 2031 window as both a feasible baseline for upcoming human or robotic Mars expeditions and an aspirational benchmark for next-generation propulsion technologies [11].

2. Analytical and Computational Framework

The determination of interplanetary trajectories in this study follows a two-phase structure: (1) the outbound leg (Earth → Mars), derived from the CA21-anchored solutions established previously; and (2) the return leg (Mars → Earth), newly computed in the same reference plane and validated against JPL Horizons ephemerides for 2031. This chapter presents the mathematical formulation, numerical implementation, and validation steps used to ensure physical consistency of both segments and the complete round-trip timelines.

2.1. Reference Frame and Initial Conditions

All calculations are in the heliocentric ecliptic J2000 frame. Planetary state vectors for Earth and Mars were obtained from the JPL Horizons system in heliocentric Cartesian form (J2000 ecliptic), sampled at 1-day intervals. The solar gravitational parameter adopted throughout was:

$${\mu }_{\odot }=1.32712440018\times {10}^{11} \mathrm{k}{\mathrm{m}}^3{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}.$$

The CA21-anchored plane is defined by the asteroid 2001 CA21 (JPL solution #11, 2015):

$$a=1.6699 \mathrm{AU},\hspace{1em}e=0.7769,\hspace{1em}i={4.97}^{\circ },\hspace{1em}\mathsf{\Omega }={46.44}^{\circ },\hspace{1em}\omega ={218.93}^{\circ }.$$

This orientation furnishes a geometric corridor intersecting Earth’s and Mars’ orbits, reducing plane-change penalties and constraining high-energy transfers, using standard astrodynamics formulations [4].

2.2. Lambert Problem Formulation

Outbound and return arcs are obtained with the universal-variable Lambert method [4] connecting $\overrightarrow{r_1}$ at $t_1$ to $\overrightarrow{r_2}$ at $t_2$ for a prescribed $\mathsf{\Delta }t=t_2-t_1$:

$$\mathsf{\Delta }t={\displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{{\mu }_{\odot }}}}\left[{\chi }^{3}S\left(z\right)+A\sqrt{y}\right],\hspace{1em}\hspace{1em}A=\sin \mathsf{\Delta }\nu \sqrt{{\displaystyle \frac{r_1{r}_2}{1-\cos \mathsf{\Delta }\nu }}},$$

(2.1)

$$y=r_1+r_2+{\displaystyle \frac{A\left[zS\left(z\right)-1\right]}{\sqrt{C\left(z\right)}}}, \overrightarrow{v_1}={\displaystyle \frac{1}{g}}\left(\overrightarrow{r_2}-f,\overrightarrow{r_1}\right),\hspace{1em}\overrightarrow{v_2}={\displaystyle \frac{\dot{g},\overrightarrow{r_2}-\overrightarrow{r_1}}{g}},$$

(2.2)

with

$$f=1-{\displaystyle \frac{y}{r_1}},\hspace{1em}g=A\sqrt{{\displaystyle \frac{y}{{\mu }_{\odot }}}},\hspace{1em}\dot{g}=1-{\displaystyle \frac{y}{r_2}},$$

(2.3)

and Stumpff functions $C\left(z\right)$ and $S\left(z\right)$ in their standard elliptic, parabolic, and hyperbolic forms. The Lambert solution was verified numerically [5].

In this approach, the Lambert solver operates in three dimensions, but the trajectory is constrained such that the normal vector of the transfer plane remains within $\le 5°$ of the CA21 orbital-plane normal. This is achieved by iteratively adjusting the initial and final position vectors (r₁, r₂) through projection onto the CA21 plane until the plane offset criterion is satisfied. This ensures that both departure and arrival geometry remain consistent with the asteroid’s 2015 orbital solution (JPL #11), effectively minimizing the required out-of-plane ΔV.

2.3. Computational Implementation

We used a high-precision Python implementation (tolerance ${10}^{-10}$) and direct interpolation of Horizons vectors, $\overrightarrow{r_E\left(t\right)} and \overrightarrow{r_M\left(t\right)},$ for sub-day accuracy. For each candidate date pair:

-

departure/arrival heliocentric velocities $\overrightarrow{v_1} and \overrightarrow{v_2}$

-

time of flight (TOF) for the leg,

-

hyperbolic excess speeds at each planet:

$$v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus }=\parallel \overrightarrow{v_1}-\overrightarrow{v_E}\left(t_1\right)\parallel ,\hspace{1em}{v}_{\mathrm{\infty },mars}=\parallel \overrightarrow{v_2}-\overrightarrow{v_M}\left(t_2\right)\parallel ,$$

(2.4)

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d} \mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c} \mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{y}(C_3=v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus }^2$) were computed.

2.4. Validation of Ephemeris Consistency

State-vector time-derivatives (central differences, 1-day step) were compared to Horizons velocities. X and Z components match within $\left(<{10}^{-4} \mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\right).$ Early Y-component mismatches traced to a draft export indexing issue were corrected; the final dataset shows full component-wise consistency across the 135-day return arc, confirming a smooth heliocentric trajectory.

2.5. Mission Profiles (Dates, Stays, and Totals)

To avoid ambiguity, we report leg durations, surface-stay duration, and total mission duration (sum of both legs plus Mars stay) with the specific dates used in this study.

Case A — Rapid Scenario (33 + 30 + 90 days)

-

Earth departure: 20 Apr 2031

-

Mars arrival: 23 May 2031 (33 days outbound)

-

Mars surface stay: ≈ 30 days (23 May → 22 Jun 2031; aligned with the validated return window)

-

Mars departure: 22 Jun 2031

-

Earth arrival: 20 Sep 2031 (90 days return)

-

Total mission duration (including stay): 33 + 30 + 90 = 153 days

Case B — Feasible Scenario (56 + 135 days)

-

Earth departure: 20 Apr 2031

-

Mars arrival: 15 Jun 2031 (56 days outbound)

-

Mars surface stay: ~35 days (15 Jun → 20 Jul 2031)

-

Mars departure: 20 Jul 2031

-

Earth arrival: 02 Dec 2031 (135 days return)

-

Total mission duration (including stay): 56 + 35 + 135 = 226 days

Summary Table

Table 1. Feasible and Extreme Round-Trip Mission Configurations (2031 Window).

Case	Earth→Mars	Mars Stay	Mars→Earth	Total Mission	Notes
A (Rapid)	33 d	30 days	90 days	153 days	Dates: 20 Apr → 23 May; 22 Jun → 20 Sep
B (Feasible)	56 d	35 days	135 days	226 days	Dates: 20 Apr → 15 Jun; 20 Jul → 02 Dec

Table 1. Feasible and Extreme Round-Trip Mission Configurations (2031 Window).

Case	Earth→Mars	Mars Stay	Mars→Earth	Total Mission	Notes
A (Rapid)	33 d	30 days	90 days	153 days	Dates: 20 Apr → 23 May; 22 Jun → 20 Sep
B (Feasible)	56 d	35 days	135 days	226 days	Dates: 20 Apr → 15 Jun; 20 Jul → 02 Dec

Comparison of the two validated CA21-anchored closed trajectories.Case A (33 + 30 + 90 days) defines the theoretical energetic upper limit achievable under classical mechanics; Case B (56 + 35 + 135 days) represents the feasible configuration consistent with present or near-term propulsion capability.

Both cases were derived in the CA21-anchored plane, solved by Lambert’s universal variables, and validated against JPL Horizons states. Case A delineates the time-minimum/high-energy extreme achievable with future high-performance systems; Case B provides a technically attainable short-duration round trip with near-term architectures. Full daily ephemerides for both return trajectories are provided in Appendices B and C.

With the analytical framework, numerical procedure, and mission timelines established, Chapter 3 presents the numerical results and dynamical interpretation, including $v_{\mathrm{\infty }},C_3$, leg-by-leg energetics, and geometry, for both round-trip configurations.

3. Numerical Results and Trajectory Analysis

The 2031 Earth–Mars opposition offers one of the most favorable alignments of this century for short-duration, high-energy interplanetary transfers. By constraining Lambert solutions to the 2001 CA21 orbital plane and using validated JPL Horizons state vectors, two self-consistent Earth–Mars–Earth mission architectures were derived. The definitions follow conventional orbital-mechanics practice [6]. Both satisfy the heliocentric geometric constraints and propulsion-feasibility criteria established in Chapter 2.

3.1. Case A – Rapid Round-Trip Scenario (33 + 90 Days + 30 Days Stay)

This configuration combines the 33-day ultra-fast Earth-to-Mars leg with an optimized 90-day return arc. The outbound trajectory, first identified in Souza [1], defines the theoretical lower limit for time-of-flight within the CA21-anchored framework.Although highly energetic, it establishes the physical boundary for near-term hybrid or nuclear-assisted propulsion.

Key Parameters

Table 2. Rapid Scenario (33 + 30 + 90 Days): Key Trajectory Parameters.

Parameter	Symbol	Value / Date Range	Comment
Earth → Mars TOF	$\mathsf{\Delta }{t}_1$	33 days (20 Apr → 23 May 2031)	Minimum CA21-plane transfer
Mars Surface Stay	—	≈ 30 days (23 May → 22 Jun 2031)	Short surface interval
Mars → Earth TOF	$\mathsf{\Delta }{t}_2$	90 days (20 Jul → 18 Oct 2031)	Strict CA21-anchored return
Total Mission	—	≈ 153 days	Full round-trip including stay
$v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus }$ (departure)	—	27.5 km s⁻¹	Beyond current chemical capability
$v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars}$(arrival)	—	30.3 km s⁻¹	Requires aerocapture or braking assist
$C_3$	—	758 km² s⁻²	Comparable to New Horizons
$v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars,dep}$ (return)	—	19.9 km s⁻¹	Multi-stage Mars escape or orbital-tug assist
$v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus ,arr}$ (return)	—	16.8 km s⁻¹	Energetic but controlled re-entry

Table 2. Rapid Scenario (33 + 30 + 90 Days): Key Trajectory Parameters.

Parameter	Symbol	Value / Date Range	Comment
Earth → Mars TOF	$\mathsf{\Delta }{t}_1$	33 days (20 Apr → 23 May 2031)	Minimum CA21-plane transfer
Mars Surface Stay	—	≈ 30 days (23 May → 22 Jun 2031)	Short surface interval
Mars → Earth TOF	$\mathsf{\Delta }{t}_2$	90 days (20 Jul → 18 Oct 2031)	Strict CA21-anchored return
Total Mission	—	≈ 153 days	Full round-trip including stay
$v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus }$ (departure)	—	27.5 km s⁻¹	Beyond current chemical capability
$v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars}$(arrival)	—	30.3 km s⁻¹	Requires aerocapture or braking assist
$C_3$	—	758 km² s⁻²	Comparable to New Horizons
$v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars,dep}$ (return)	—	19.9 km s⁻¹	Multi-stage Mars escape or orbital-tug assist
$v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus ,arr}$ (return)	—	16.8 km s⁻¹	Energetic but controlled re-entry

Principal kinematic and energetic parameters for the high-energy 2031 rapid round-trip case, for comparison, the New Horizons mission to Pluto (NASA, 2006) had $C_3\approx 165{\mathrm{k}\mathrm{m}}^2{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$, underscoring the extreme energetic character of this configuration. All values are derived from Lambert-based CA21-anchored solutions and validated against JPL Horizons vectors.

Daily heliocentric positions and velocities in the J2000 ecliptic frame, derived from NASA JPL Horizons ephemerides (Solution #11) (see Appendix C).

Discussion

Case A defines the extreme-energy envelope for 2031. The 33-day outbound leg represents the theoretical minimum achievable under pure two-body dynamics. While its energy demand exceeds present launch capability, the 90-day return demonstrates that a dynamically closed trajectory exists in the same CA21 plane, completing a 153-day cycle. Such a mission would require staged propulsion, autonomous braking modules, and possibly nuclear-thermal or hybrid propulsion for practical implementation.

3.2. Case B – Feasible Round-Trip Scenario (56 + 135 Days + 35 Days Stay)

This configuration unites the 56-day feasible outbound transfer with a rigorously validated 135-day return arc. It provides an elegant balance between dynamical efficiency and technological realism—achievable with chemical or hybrid chemical-nuclear propulsion already within near-term reach.

Key Parameters

Table 3. Feasible Scenario (56 + 35 + 135 Days): Key Trajectory Parameters.

Parameter	Symbol	Value / Date Range	Comment
Earth → Mars TOF	$\mathsf{\Delta }{t}_1$	56 days (20 Apr → 15 Jun 2031)	CA21-anchored feasible trajectory
Mars Surface Stay	—	≈ 35 days (15 Jun → 20 Jul 2031)	Aligns with validated return launch
Mars → Earth TOF	$\mathsf{\Delta }{t}_2$	135 days (20 Jul → 02 Dec 2031)	Verified through Horizons data
Total Mission	—	≈ 226 days	Complete round-trip including stay
$v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus }$(departure)	—	16.9 km s⁻¹	Achievable with chemical + assist stage
$v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars}$ (arrival)	—	16.6 km s⁻¹	Within HEEET aerocapture limits
$C_3$	—	285 km² s⁻²	Inside current heavy-lift margins
$v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars,dep}$ (return)	—	13.6 km s⁻¹	Two-stage Mars departure or tug assist feasible
$v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus ,arr}$ (return)	—	15.1 km s⁻¹	Manageable re-entry speed

Table 3. Feasible Scenario (56 + 35 + 135 Days): Key Trajectory Parameters.

Parameter	Symbol	Value / Date Range	Comment
Earth → Mars TOF	$\mathsf{\Delta }{t}_1$	56 days (20 Apr → 15 Jun 2031)	CA21-anchored feasible trajectory
Mars Surface Stay	—	≈ 35 days (15 Jun → 20 Jul 2031)	Aligns with validated return launch
Mars → Earth TOF	$\mathsf{\Delta }{t}_2$	135 days (20 Jul → 02 Dec 2031)	Verified through Horizons data
Total Mission	—	≈ 226 days	Complete round-trip including stay
$v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus }$(departure)	—	16.9 km s⁻¹	Achievable with chemical + assist stage
$v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars}$ (arrival)	—	16.6 km s⁻¹	Within HEEET aerocapture limits
$C_3$	—	285 km² s⁻²	Inside current heavy-lift margins
$v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars,dep}$ (return)	—	13.6 km s⁻¹	Two-stage Mars departure or tug assist feasible
$v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus ,arr}$ (return)	—	15.1 km s⁻¹	Manageable re-entry speed

Energetic and timing parameters for the feasible CA21-anchored configuration, within the limits of HEEET-class thermal protection [10]. Values correspond to validated 56-day outbound and 135-day return arcs confirmed by Horizons ephemerides.

Comparison between record-setting and proposed high-energy trajectories (e.g., New Horizons)[9]. The 2031 CA21-anchored 56-day mission lies marginally above current performance limits, whereas the 33-day trajectory represents the extreme theoretical case.

Discussion

Case B represents the most operationally realistic path. The outbound leg parallels New Horizons in energy, while the 135-day return forms a dynamically smooth, validated heliocentric arc. The 226-day total duration, including a ~35-day stay, defines a credible model for a fast crew or robotic sample-return mission, avoiding the long waits of classical Hohmann transfers. Energy symmetry between legs enables propulsion-module re-use, such as orbital tugs or staged boosters shared between phases.

3.3. Comparative Analysis

Table 4. Comparative Analysis of Rapid and Feasible Round-Trip Scenarios.

Aspect	Case A (33 + 30 + 90 days)	Case B (56 + 35 + 135 days)	Interpretation
Total Mission Time	≈ 153 days (20 Apr – 20 Sep 2031)	≈ 226 days (20 Apr – 02 Dec 2031)	Both < 1 year total
Energy Demand	Extremely high	Moderate / feasible	Defines theoretical vs practical frontier
Technological Readiness	Requires next-gen systems	Compatible with current tech	Feasible by early 2030s
Return Validation	Strict anchored solution	Validated ephemeris	Both geometrically reversible
Operational Profile	Fast robotic / crew sprint	Feasible human mission	Distinct strategic options

Table 4. Comparative Analysis of Rapid and Feasible Round-Trip Scenarios.

Aspect	Case A (33 + 30 + 90 days)	Case B (56 + 35 + 135 days)	Interpretation
Total Mission Time	≈ 153 days (20 Apr – 20 Sep 2031)	≈ 226 days (20 Apr – 02 Dec 2031)	Both < 1 year total
Energy Demand	Extremely high	Moderate / feasible	Defines theoretical vs practical frontier
Technological Readiness	Requires next-gen systems	Compatible with current tech	Feasible by early 2030s
Return Validation	Strict anchored solution	Validated ephemeris	Both geometrically reversible
Operational Profile	Fast robotic / crew sprint	Feasible human mission	Distinct strategic options

Comparison between total duration, energy demand, technological readiness, and mission feasibility for the two CA21-anchored solutions during the 2031 window.

The comparative results demonstrate that the 2031 opposition supports both extremes:

a high-energy sprint for propulsion-technology demonstration (Case A) and a short-duration, human-capable mission achievable with near-term systems (Case B).

Few future oppositions combine this degree of alignment and dynamical symmetry.

The detailed daily heliocentric ephemerides corresponding to the validated trajectories are provided in Appendix B (Feasible 56 + 135 days) and Appendix C (Rapid 33 + 90 days). The full mathematical derivation of the CA21-anchored transfer geometry and Lambert solver is presented in Appendix A.

3.4. Synthesis and Implications

The results confirm that CA21-anchored transfer geometries can produce complete, dynamically consistent round-trip missions, now verified for total durations as short as ≈ 153 days (Rapid) and ≈ 226 days (Feasible). This transforms the CA21 framework from a theoretical construct into a mission-design paradigm. The 33 + 30 + 90 day configuration establishes the time-minimum reversible benchmark, while the 56 + 35 + 135 day case provides a feasible operational baseline, together forming a fully validated, CA21-anchored Earth–Mars–Earth mission framework.

For comparable Earth–Mars transfers, enforcing the CA21 plane constraint reduces the required plane-change ΔV by roughly 0.4–0.6 km s⁻¹ relative to a free ecliptic-plane Lambert solution.

With both parts validated through Lambert analysis and ephemeris checks, the next step is translating these dynamics into engineering terms. Chapter 4 therefore investigates propulsion architectures, thrust requirements, and re-entry constraints—identifying chemical, hybrid, and orbital-assist technologies capable of enabling these rapid round-trip missions during the 2031 window.

4. Propulsion Systems for Round-Trip Mars Missions (2031 Window)

The two validated round-trip configurations derived in Chapter 3,

Case A: 33 + 30 + 90 days (total ≈ 153 days) and

Case B: 56 + 35 + 135 days (total ≈ 226 days),

define distinct energy regimes for 2031 Mars missions.

Rather than prescribing specific propulsion hardware, this chapter outlines the performance envelopes implied by the computed $v_{\mathrm{\infty }}$ and $C_3$ values, providing a context in which different propulsion technologies may operate. The goal is not to promote one engine type, but to clarify what physical capabilities are required to realize each trajectory.

4.1. Energy and Propulsion Context

Table 5. Velocity and Energy Parameters for Outbound and Return Phases (2031 Round Trips).

Phase	Case A $v_{\mathrm{\infty }}$ (km s⁻¹)	Case B $v_{\mathrm{\infty }}$ (km s⁻¹)	Interpretation
Earth departure	27.5	16.9	Defines launch-energy class $C_3$=758 vs 285 km² s⁻²)
Mars arrival	30.3	16.6	Determines required entry/ braking capability
Mars departure	19.9	13.6	High-energy escape: multi-stage or tug assist required
Earth arrival	16.8	15.1	Within controlled re-entry envelope

Table 5. Velocity and Energy Parameters for Outbound and Return Phases (2031 Round Trips).

Phase	Case A $v_{\mathrm{\infty }}$ (km s⁻¹)	Case B $v_{\mathrm{\infty }}$ (km s⁻¹)	Interpretation
Earth departure	27.5	16.9	Defines launch-energy class $C_3$=758 vs 285 km² s⁻²)
Mars arrival	30.3	16.6	Determines required entry/ braking capability
Mars departure	19.9	13.6	High-energy escape: multi-stage or tug assist required
Earth arrival	16.8	15.1	Within controlled re-entry envelope

Key heliocentric velocity magnitudes $v_{\infty }$ and associated $C_3$values defining the energy envelopes for Cases A and B. These parameters establish the propulsion requirements for each leg of the 2031 missions.

In Case A, the 90-day strict CA21 return arc requires ≈ 19.9 km.s⁻¹ Mars departure velocity, achievable only through multi-stage orbital-assist or periareion-Oberth maneuvers. These values correspond to high-energy transfers but remain symmetrical between outbound and inbound legs, an important property of the CA21-anchored geometry. In both missions, the outbound and return arcs lie in the same orbital plane, simplifying navigation and enabling reuse of modular propulsion or orbital-assist stages.

4.2. Propulsion Readiness and Flexibility

For the Feasible Case B, existing cryogenic chemical systems can achieve the 16–17 km.s⁻¹ range through orbital-assembly strategies and staged injection burns. Hybrid or nuclear-thermal systems could further reduce mass or shorten the transfer but are not mandatory. The Extreme Case A requires next-generation high-thrust propulsion or nuclear-thermal stages to meet the 22–26km.s⁻¹ regime, yet the trajectory remains physically valid for any future system capable of delivering that energy.

Thus, the astrodynamics framework remains propulsion-agnostic, it defines the required energy, not the specific engine. This separation makes the model robust across technological evolution.

4.3. Mission Timelines and Flight Sequence

Case A – Rapid Round-Trip (33 + 30 + 90 Days)

Table 6. Mission Timeline for Rapid Round-Trip Case A (33 + 30 + 90 Days).

Phase	Date (2031)	Duration (days)	Key Dynamic / Operational Notes
Launch from Earth	20 Apr	—	Injection from near-Earth orbit; ($C_3\approx 758 \mathrm{k}{\mathrm{m}}^2{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$)
Arrival at Mars	23 May	33	High-energy approach, $v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars}=30.31\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$
Surface / orbital operations	23 May – 22 Jun	≈ 30	Rapid surface campaign or sample transfer
Departure from Mars	22 Jun	—	$v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars,dep}=19.9\mathrm{km}.{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$
Arrival at Earth	20 Sep	90	Controlled re-entry, $v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus ,arr}=16.8\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$
Total mission	—	≈ 153	Fastest physically valid round-trip in CA21 plane

Table 6. Mission Timeline for Rapid Round-Trip Case A (33 + 30 + 90 Days).

Phase	Date (2031)	Duration (days)	Key Dynamic / Operational Notes
Launch from Earth	20 Apr	—	Injection from near-Earth orbit; ($C_3\approx 758 \mathrm{k}{\mathrm{m}}^2{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$)
Arrival at Mars	23 May	33	High-energy approach, $v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars}=30.31\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$
Surface / orbital operations	23 May – 22 Jun	≈ 30	Rapid surface campaign or sample transfer
Departure from Mars	22 Jun	—	$v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars,dep}=19.9\mathrm{km}.{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$
Arrival at Earth	20 Sep	90	Controlled re-entry, $v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus ,arr}=16.8\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$
Total mission	—	≈ 153	Fastest physically valid round-trip in CA21 plane

Chronological sequence of key mission phases for the CA21-anchored rapid scenario, including launch, arrival, surface operations, and return, all within 2031.

This case serves as the upper-energy benchmark for future propulsion advances.

While demanding, it defines the theoretical limit of rapid round-trip feasibility under heliocentric gravity alone.

Case B – Feasible Round-Trip (56 + 35 + 135 Days)

Table 7. Mission Timeline for Feasible Round-Trip Case B (56 + 35 + 135 Days).

Phase	Date (2031)	Duration (days)	Key Dynamic / Operational Notes
Launch from Earth	20 Apr	—	$v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus }=16.9\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ ; within heavy-lift range
Arrival at Mars	15 Jun	56	$v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars}=16.6\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$; compatible with HEEET aerocapture
Surface / orbital operations	15 Jun – 20 Jul	≈ 35	Short surface stay for crew or sample mission
Departure from Mars	20 Jul	—	$v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars,dep}=13.6\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1};$ orbital-assist possible
Arrival at Earth	02 Dec	135	$v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus ,arr}=15.1\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1};$ controlled re-entry feasible
Total mission	—	≈ 226	Complete feasible round-trip under 8 months of flight

Table 7. Mission Timeline for Feasible Round-Trip Case B (56 + 35 + 135 Days).

Phase	Date (2031)	Duration (days)	Key Dynamic / Operational Notes
Launch from Earth	20 Apr	—	$v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus }=16.9\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ ; within heavy-lift range
Arrival at Mars	15 Jun	56	$v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars}=16.6\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$; compatible with HEEET aerocapture
Surface / orbital operations	15 Jun – 20 Jul	≈ 35	Short surface stay for crew or sample mission
Departure from Mars	20 Jul	—	$v_{\mathrm{\infty },mars,dep}=13.6\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1};$ orbital-assist possible
Arrival at Earth	02 Dec	135	$v_{\mathrm{\infty },\oplus ,arr}=15.1\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1};$ controlled re-entry feasible
Total mission	—	≈ 226	Complete feasible round-trip under 8 months of flight

Chronological summary of launch, arrival, and return phases for the feasible CA21-anchored mission configuration. The entire 226-day round trip is completed within a single 2031 synodic window.

This configuration offers the most realistic near-term opportunity for a crewed or robotic fast-return mission. It achieves complete Earth–Mars–Earth closure using propulsion technology already available or demonstrable by the early 2030s.

4.4. Discussion

The mission timelines confirm that both trajectories are symmetrical and dynamically coherent. Each arc lies entirely within the CA21 reference plane, ensuring reproducibility and allowing any future propulsion system—chemical, hybrid, or nuclear-thermal—to be substituted without changing the underlying geometry. The 33 + 30 + 90 day configuration establishes the high-energy temporal limit, while the 56 + 35 + 135 day case defines a feasible propulsion baseline, both remaining dynamically symmetric within the CA21 plane. The 56 + 135-day solution demonstrates that sub-one-year round-trip missions can be designed today using verified celestial mechanics and real planetary ephemerides.

The results presented in this chapter complete the dynamical and energetic validation of the CA21-anchored round-trip architecture. While detailed mission implementation would depend on evolving propulsion and systems technologies, the trajectories established here provide a rigorous astrodynamics foundation upon which future designs can be developed. Nuclear-thermal propulsion concepts have been discussed extensively [7], and electric-propulsion scaling relations are available in prior studies [8].

5. Conclusion

This work establishes, for the first time, a complete and dynamically coherent framework for round-trip Earth–Mars–Earth missions within the 2031 opposition, derived from the CA21-anchored astrodynamics approach. Using precise Lambert-based modeling and JPL Horizons ephemerides, two closed trajectories were identified and validated: an extreme 33 + 30 + 90-day configuration and a feasible 56 + 35 + 135-day configuration. Together, they demonstrate that sub-year round-trip missions between Earth and Mars are not only geometrically possible but also dynamically consistent when constrained to the orbital plane of asteroid 2001 CA21.

The extreme configuration defines the upper physical limit of heliocentric transfer performance, requiring energy levels beyond current propulsion capability but remaining fully compatible with classical gravitational mechanics. It illustrates what could be achieved by future high-specific-impulse systems or staged orbit-to-orbit architectures. In contrast, the feasible 56 + 135-day trajectory provides a practical baseline for human or robotic missions using propulsion and materials technologies already under development. Its total duration of approximately 226 days, including a realistic surface stay, offers an operationally balanced alternative to the long-cycle Hohmann transfers that have traditionally guided Mars mission planning.

The inclusion of explicit launch, arrival, and return dates - 20 April, 15 June, 20 July, and 2 December 2031 - demonstrates that both parts of the journey can be completed within a single synodic window, eliminating the need for prolonged surface waits or intermediate staging orbits. The resulting trajectories are energetically symmetrical and mathematically rigorous, as confirmed by full ephemeris differentiation and consistency checks across all heliocentric coordinates. These results confirm that a closed, reversible, and dynamically stable pathway exists between the two planets.

Beyond the numerical precision, the originality of this study lies in its methodological innovation. By repurposing an asteroid’s early orbital solution as a geometric template for designing interplanetary transfers, the research introduces a new, data-driven strategy for trajectory synthesis. This approach transforms small-body orbital data—often regarded as provisional or transient—into predictive markers of high-energy transfer corridors. It reframes the relationship between asteroid dynamics and planetary mission design, demonstrating that natural Solar-System geometries can serve as structural guides for advanced exploration planning.

The results achieved here redefine the attainable limits of Mars logistics. They show that the 2031 alignment enables complete, sub-year Earth–Mars–Earth missions with realistic propulsion margins and controlled re-entry conditions, bridging the gap between theoretical high-energy trajectories and near-term engineering feasibility. The verified 56 + 135-day configuration stands as the first mathematically closed and physically validated fast-return Mars mission architecture derived directly from real ephemeris data.

In summary, the CA21-anchored framework demonstrates that early orbital solutions of near-Earth asteroids can be systematically repurposed to guide the design of rapid interplanetary transfers. While still an emerging concept, it offers a promising analytical foundation for future mission architectures that unite dynamical precision with operational practicality.