In this article, we will delineate the various methodologies by which the base-four system can be applied.
2.1.1. Generalizations
The following table presents a truth table for the sequential relationship of each and every digit in the system. As is commonly understood, the numbers in the base-four or quaternary number system are:
The inclusion of the numbers 2 and 3 contributes their qualities to the strangest, yet most consistent, vision of the base-four system. These qualities are logically and mathematically significant, as they facilitate our ability to describe the world as it is, both mentally, materially, and energetically.
It is conceivable that many individuals, particularly those of the Orthodox mathematical persuasion, may perceive these attributes as mere imagination. However, through rigorous analysis and experimentation, it has been demonstrated that these qualities are indeed complementary to one of the fundamental properties of numbers. Consequently, since antiquity, these attributes have been methodically categorized into two distinct classes: Even and Odd numbers.
In my forthcoming article,
"The Structure of Odd Perfect Numbers is Slightly Different from that of Even ones, but they Really do Exist!", which is scheduled for submission to the Preprints.org platform, a comprehensive analysis of the completeness property of the number two, in the sense of being a complete number, and the incompleteness property of the number three, in the sense of being an incomplete number, is presented. It is evident that the number two is the generator of all even numbers, according [
5] Book VII Definition: 8 and the number three is the generator half of the odd numbers when multiplied by an odd numbers and half of the even numbers when multiplied by an even numbers, according Euclid’s Elements Book VII Definitions: 9 and 10, the other half of odd number are generated by
relation, where
.
Therefore, it can be concluded that all even numbers are complete numbers, and all odd numbers are incomplete numbers. This includes prime numbers, with the exception of two.
The property of completeness and incompleteness of the numbers two and three, as the originators of even and odd numbers, has led us to consider two categories of prime numbers:
- 1.
Authentic prime numbers. . They are unique.
- 2.
Common prime numbers. , . They are infinite.
The property of authentic prime numbers serves to reinforce the base-four number system. Consequently, prime numbers two and three are not merely arbitrary prime numbers; rather, they are the fundamental elements that provide the foundation for the building bricks (Common primes) of any number system, irrespective of its base.
The following table provides a detailed description of the relationship between the set of numbers .
Table 1.
Relation between { 0, 1, 2, 3} and its significance under the concepts of true and false.
Table 1.
Relation between { 0, 1, 2, 3} and its significance under the concepts of true and false.
| Description Table |
| Description |
Digits |
Results |
| Value |
Meaning |
p |
q |
State |
Concept 1 |
Concept 2 |
| 0 |
False - False |
0 |
0 |
F |
F |
True |
| 0 |
False - True |
0 |
1 |
F - T |
Contradiction |
Negation |
|
False - Complete |
0 |
2 |
Fc |
Affirmation |
Hight: Probably false |
|
False - Incomplete |
0 |
3 |
Fi |
Affirmation |
Less likely to be false |
| 0 |
Truth - False |
1 |
0 |
T - F |
Contradiction |
Negation |
| 1 |
Truth - Truth |
1 |
1 |
T |
100 % T |
True |
|
Truth - Complete |
1 |
2 |
Tc |
Affirmation |
It is probably true. |
|
Truth - Incomplete |
1 |
3 |
Ti |
Affirmation |
Less likely to be true. |
|
Complete - False |
2 |
0 |
cF |
Affirmation |
Hight: Probably false. |
|
Complete - Truth |
2 |
1 |
cT |
Affirmation |
It is probably true. |
| 0 |
Complete - Complete |
2 |
2 |
cc |
Indefinable |
Without reference |
| 0 |
Complete - Incomplete |
2 |
3 |
ci |
Indefinable |
Without reference |
|
Incomplete - False |
3 |
0 |
iF |
Affirmation |
Hight: Probably false |
|
Incomplete - Truth |
3 |
1 |
iT |
Affirmation |
Less likely to be true. |
| 0 |
Incomplete - Complete |
3 |
2 |
ic |
Indefinable |
Without reference |
| 0 |
Incomplete - Incomplete |
3 |
3 |
ii |
Indefinable |
Without reference |
There are five pairs on symmetric relation: , where | is a mirror axis. , , , which can get a some value and the F, T pair, which has a value respectively. The states are indefinable.
But what does it mean for a proposition to be true—incomplete or complete? Or for a proposition to be false—incomplete or complete? If it’s incomplete, it means there’s a lack of evidence. The evidence will then be part of a series of interrogative and affirmative propositions that formalize the proof in each case.
3
One of the most significant challenges for mathematicians throughout history has been to uncover the profound connection between nature and numbers, particularly in regard to the implications of the language we use to communicate with one another. Natural language is so diverse and versatile that it is incredibly difficult to classify it in a mathematical formula or equation. Nevertheless, significant efforts have been made to establish rules of logical thinking that unequivocally define every proposition as either true or false, depending on the implication.
Mathematical logic, even at the present moment, is no longer adequate to meet the expectations inherent in the most common sense of our current daily reality. The use of mass and social media complicates the discernment of factual information, necessitating the evaluation of such content through a parameter that fluctuates between truth and falsehood. The development of an algorithm capable of discerning truth from falsehood will facilitate the calculation of this parameter.
In light of the aforementioned points, it is imperative to explore the implementation of the base-four number system in the context of research and development initiatives concerning novel codes, software, and electronic devices. These devices encompass logic gates that facilitate the activation of truth and falsehood values, in addition to their intermediate values. The assessment of these values enables the determination of the proximity to truth or falsehood. The subsequent discussion will address the classification of information as either factual or fabricated, with the understanding that such classification is the intentional decree of governing bodies, whether they be governmental entities, individuals, corporations, political movements, religious congregations, or scientific collectives.
Some examples of how we can treat new logical concepts that are intermediate between true and false are as follows:
Proposition A: If I make mistakes but also have successes, then I am human.
Proposition B: If I only have successes, then I am not human.
Proposition C: If I only make mistakes, then I am not human.
Conclusion: Therefore, I am half human and half non-human.
We only have qualities because a defect is a quality that has been diminished, and a quality is a defect that has been overcome.
Recalling René Descartes’s thoughts.
Proposition A: I think, therefore I am. (cogito, ergo sum )
Proposition B: But, if I don’t think, then I don’t exist. (Non cogito, ergo non sum)
Proposition C: If I exist and don’t exist, then I don’t exist. Why?
Conclusion: Yes I am or I am not, but not both at the same time.
In some cases the conclusion will be logical, but in many other cases the conclusion will have an illogical answer.
This will be discussed in more detail in my book,Introduction to Logostics Thought,because we need to discuss what it means to be human or non-human, and whether or not to exist.
So this series of articles focuses more on the technological aspect.
However, the question remains: is there a demand for maintaining the truth in secrecy? I would like to know whether there is interest in maintaining the status quo. What if the lie is disguised as truth? There will certainly be many interests in keeping the information we receive camouflaged between truth and lies.
The development of the Discern of Information Algorithm (DIA) could represent a significant step forward for our civilization, potentially leading to a new era of evolution. If we can successfully implement this algorithm, it will contribute to a more gnostic, just, and truthful civilization. The truth has the potential to make us truly free, more intelligent, and wise, and it can help resolve conflicts through the use of good reason and true justice. However, humans face a significant challenge in this regard. At birth, the human being is said to possess truth and falsehood. Initially, the foundation of our perception of truth is generally a truth induced by those in our inner circle. The emergence of reason invariably gives rise to inquiries into the veracity of previously held beliefs, yet the influence of others remains an inescapable reality. Consequently, individuals adapt their perception of reality to align with the prevailing circumstances, thereby positioning themselves within the interplay of external influences, encompassing the inquiries and skepticism of others, and their own attempts to exert influence on others.
Consequently, individuals tend to assume that their personal truths are universally valid, yet the recognition that these truths may differ from those of others is crucial for avoiding conflicts that are multifaceted and intricate in nature. The implications of truth or falsehood extend to all aspects of an individual’s existence, making it difficult to categorize or simplify these disagreements.
It is imperative to acknowledge that the concepts of absolute truth and falsehood are illusory. The only method by which to ascertain a veritable truth is to aggregate the individual truths of all the inhabitants of our planet. Furthermore, it would be necessary to aggregate the cumulative falsehoods perpetrated by the entire global population. For all of the aforementioned points, a potential methodology has been identified that could serve as a means to assess the extent of veracity and falsehoods present within our society.
It is acknowledged that, under the initial approach of this theory, there will be a preponderance of questions over answers. However, as the algorithms that are not yet fully comprehended are investigated in greater depth, the theoretical foundation will be solidified. However, it is imperative to transcend the threshold of Type I civilization as delineated by Kardashev’s [
7] classification system, even predicted by machine learning. The necessity arises from the imperative to evolve beyond the confines of our current state, thereby attaining the attributes of a universal civilization. This universal civilization must be characterized by the presence of a well-formed collective consciousness and a heightened level of wisdom. Consequently, the present moment necessitates the initiation of practices that will facilitate the realization of these objectives.
2.1.3. Adaptive MOSFETs (AMOS).
I’m not sure if it’s appropriate to consider an application other than the one commonly used for MOSFETs, particularly in regard to their use in logic gates through their complementary structural arrangement. This is why they are known as CMOS. In the following diagram,
Figure 2 referenced as
Figure 2, I propose a different architecture and present it to the strictest consensus of engineers and scientists who specialize in researching and developing such wonderful electronic devices. Therefore, this proposal should be taken as just that—a proposal that may or may not work. When tested, it will either prove successful or reveal the need for an alternative. It will, however, prompt the search for an alternative because I’m certain one exists, but we haven’t found it yet.
In a simulation table with three inputs and three outputs, the number system’s cycles are reduced to four states, see
Table 3, referenced as
Table 3.
In a circuit with MOSFET elements, it is possible to consider the interaction with a negative voltage. In this case, the first two outputs are activated between positive and ground, and the other input is separately activated between negative and ground.
The third output is activated by the sum of the two voltages with respect to ground, that is, between the positive and negative polarity voltages. For instance, if the system is activated with 1 volt, the third output would be activated with 2 volts.
For this application, CNT-SGT transistors in MVL architecture are a viable option [
1]. These systems are currently being researched and developed at Peking University for application in balanced ternary systems. However, our primary objective is to identify the most effective way to express the base-four system. These proposals will be analyzed later in this article, but it is important to consider all possible options.
As outlined in
Table 1, the general interpretation of the interrelationship of the digits in the base-four number system is clearly defined for all possible ranges of uncertainty that can arise between false and true. To provide a more meaningful summary of this relationship, we consider:
- i)
False.
- ii)
True
This values have been correctly established and are well understood by all relevant parties.
The following values are logical complements that define a certain value between 0 and 1. If desired, these values can be made more precise. This property suggests a new paradigm for quantum computing, as the collapse of a wave function does not have to be zero or one. Instead, it can collapse to any interval between 0 and 1, thanks to the base-four system, which allows for measurement. Generally speaking, we can enhance precision and reduce errors in the following ways:
- i)
complete false.
- ii)
incomplete false.
- iii
complete true.
- iv)
incomplete true.
For the following circuit, we developed the following state table, considering the active elements in the circuit and the preliminary interpretation we are proposing. This is subject to the scrutiny of specialists in this technology and logic.
Figure 2.
Circuit TiTo without R, C or any other electronic devices implemented in a real circuits, to simulate the base-four system.
Figure 2.
Circuit TiTo without R, C or any other electronic devices implemented in a real circuits, to simulate the base-four system.
2.1.5. AND and OR Gates
The relationship between the AND and OR gates can be described in two ways. First, it can be described by its development with the complete sequence. Second, it can be summarized in the elementary cycles that are always repeated. These cycles simplify the operation of the gates. Let be a set of P and the elements of the set Q. Therefore the table is the following:
Table 5.
General Table for P and Q sets.
Table 5.
General Table for P and Q sets.
| The states table P,Q. |
| Elements of P |
Elements of Q |
Quaternary |
Decimal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| 0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
| 0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
| 0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
4 |
| 0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
5 |
| 0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
12 |
6 |
| 0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
7 |
| 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
8 |
| 1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
21 |
9 |
| 1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
22 |
10 |
| 1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
23 |
11 |
| 1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
12 |
| 1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
31 |
13 |
| 1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
32 |
14 |
| 1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
33 |
15 |
After employing the logical operators of conjunction and disjunction to each set, we obtain the following results.
Table 6.
General table for sets P and Q in conjunction and disjunction operations.
Table 6.
General table for sets P and Q in conjunction and disjunction operations.
| The states table P,Q. |
| P |
Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| 0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| 0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| 0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| 0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| 0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| 0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| 1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| 1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| 1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| 1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| 1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| 1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| 1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
As we can see from the table above, the term in the first position is repeated every four successions, so it can be considered a quadrupling pattern with the second term. The first term is identical to a binary system of two propositions.
Table 7.
Reducing the inputs and outputs of AND and OR gates.
Table 7.
Reducing the inputs and outputs of AND and OR gates.
| States table |
| Block q
|
Block p
|
|
|
|
|
Factor |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| 1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| 1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
The relationship between the quaternary and binary systems is very close, as demonstrated by the truth tables and application of each binary operator. We haven’t gone into much detail since this information is widely known.
The most important thing at this point is to take full advantage of the base-four system when developing electronic elements that can operate this logic directly using its digits . This would give us a significant advantage because we wouldn’t need to make major changes to programming, computer languages, codes, or special software.
However, the base-four system has much more interesting potential that we can explore in future computing developments. One of the most intriguing aspects is presented in the following section of this article.