Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Epidemics of Antimicrobial Resistance in Conflict Areas: Representative Recent Examples from the Middle East and Ukraine: The Time for Action Is Now

Submitted:

06 October 2025

Posted:

07 October 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a pressing global health concern, and its impact is magnified in the setting of armed conflict. Wars undermine health systems by disrupting infection prevention and control, damaging water and sanitation infrastructure, limiting access to diagnostics, and driving unregulated use of antimicrobials. Infections of war wounds typically follow a temporal pattern: gram-positive organisms dominate the early phase, whereas gram-negative pathogens increasingly complicate care in the following days. Reports consistently describe high rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), while among gram-negative bacteria, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae are the principal multidrug-resistant agents. In the Eastern Mediterranean Region, resistance levels are among the highest recorded worldwide, with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales being especially common. In Ukraine, recent analyses highlight the predominance of metallo-β-lactamases, particularly NDM in Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa, and OXA-23/-72 in A. baumannii. Forced displacement on an unprecedented scale further accelerates the cross-border spread of resistant strains. Surveillance, however, remains patchy: laboratory capacity is frequently impaired, and available studies are heterogeneous in methods and quality, limiting accurate assessment of the burden. This review brings together evidence from recent conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine, examining resistance trends, underlying drivers, and their implications for clinical practice. Addressing AMR in conflict requires immediate, pragmatic steps: restoration of infection control and water systems, targeted screening of high-risk patients, context-specific antimicrobial stewardship, and the development of lean but standardized surveillance systems suited to resource-limited and insecure environments.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has been identified as a global public health problem with implications extending beyond health into social and economic domains. Recent estimates indicate that more than one million deaths were attributable to AMR in 2019 [1]. The economic burden on healthcare systems due to infections by resistant pathogens may reach thousands of dollars per case [2,3], while projections suggest that global gross domestic product (GDP) could shrink significantly, potentially pushing 28 million people into poverty by 2050, according to World Bank estimates [4]. The 2024 WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List classifies Enterobacterales resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, Enterobacterales and Acinetobacter baumannii resistant to carbapenems (CRAB), as “critical” pathogens, given their limited treatment options and high associated morbidity and mortality [5].
The burden of AMR is aggravated in conflict areas where political instability, economic collapse, and environmental destruction undermine healthcare systems [6]. Historically, during World War II, most of the patients experienced nosocomial infections, revealing the importance of infection prevention and control [7]. AMR, potentially driven by heavy metals used in weaponry, was hypothesized as early as World War II [8]. The widespread introduction of penicillin, followed by its combination with other antibiotic classes, contributed to the emergence of resistant pathogens, a trend that became more evident during the Vietnam War [7]. However, AMR was most clearly highlighted during and following the Iraq wars of the 1980s, where evidence supported an increasing proportion of resistant gram-negative pathogens during the period 1981-1988 of the Iran-Iraq war [9]. This review article describes the epidemiology and emergence of AMR in recent conflict zones of the Middle East and Ukraine.

Epidemiology of Resistant Pathogens: The Examples of the Recent Conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine

Indicative data of the epidemiology of MDR pathogens in areas of conflict are presented in Table 1.

Data from Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan

Retrospective data from Iran (1981, 1985, 1987), based on blood, cerebrospinal fluid, stool, and pus cultures, demonstrated a steady predominance of gram-negative pathogens, with increasing resistance to multiple antibiotic classes [9]. E. coli and Klebsiella spp. were the most frequent urinary pathogens, while Enterobacter emerged as a major cause of central nervous system infection, together with Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter. Over the same period, gram-negative bacteremia showed a rising trend [9]. Although gram-negative organisms were identified in a study from 1987 evaluating war injury data from 1983-4 and after, they were not yet widely recognized as dominant contributors to war-related infections at the time(10). Additional Iranian data from head wound, bone, and brain tissue infections identified Acinetobacter spp. and staphylococci among the most common pathogens [10].
In more recent conflicts, AMR epidemiology has been better characterized. A retrospective analysis of open tibial fractures from wounded U.S. military personnel from Iran or Afghanistan, between March 2003 and September 2006, revealed gram-negative organisms (mostly Acinetobacter, Enterobacter spp., and P.aeruginosa) as the main cause of infection, while staphylococci were primarily associated with recurrent infections [11]. A study from a tertiary U.S. military hospital in Baghdad (August 2003–July 2004) analyzed blood, wound, sputum, and urine cultures from both U.S. personnel and Iraqi civilians. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) were the most frequent isolates, followed by gram-negative pathogens (K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, E. coli) [12]. Resistant gram-negative organisms were more common among Iraqi patients, raising concerns about nosocomial transmission to American military personnel. Despite broad resistance, gram-negative isolates generally remained susceptible to amikacin and, particularly, carbapenems [12]. The proportion of MRSA among S. aureus was reported as high as 68%. Supporting this, Kaspar et al. found evidence of nosocomial acquisition of MDR pathogens in evacuated patients, based on serial screening cultures demonstrating increased colonization after transfer from Iraq to the U.S. [13].
Reports from the Iraq war in the 2000s consistently identified resistant A. baumannii as a major pathogen in injured personnel, both in wounds and the bloodstream [14,15]. In a retrospective analysis of Iraqi and American patients admitted to the U.S. Navy Hospital Ship (March–April 2003), A. baumannii was the leading cause of injury-related infections, followed by E. coli and Pseudomonas spp. More than 80% of Acinetobacter isolates were susceptible only to imipenem. The pathogen was recorded as the major cause of injury-related infections, followed by E.coli and Pseudomonas spp. in a retrospective analysis from Iraqi and American patients admitted to the U.S. Navy Hospital Ship during the period March-April 2003 [16]. More than 80% of Acinetobacter spp. isolates were susceptible only to imipenem [16]. Studying A. baumannii bacteremia in one of these reports revealed that 62% of cases occurred within the first 48 hours after hospital admission [15]; 35% of the isolates were susceptible only to imipenem, while 4% were pan-drug-resistant [15]. According to Turton et al., the identification of common strains of A. baumannii in both U.S. and U.K. casualties when returning to their home countries suggests in acquisition in Iraq [14]. This underscores the risk that resistant pathogens originating in conflict zones can spread internationally if infection prevention and control measures are inadequate, highlighting the urgent need for robust AMR surveillance and global biosecurity strategies in conflict-affected regions.

Data from Syria

In Syria, surveillance data were sparse before the 2011 conflict, generally relying on single-center studies with small sample sizes and methodological limitations [17]. A retrospective analysis of data from the Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) surgical project in Jordan, that admitted Syrian patients, with war-related injuries and suspected infections, described the microbiologic profile based on intraoperative specimens [18] (Table 1). In that series, an MDR pathogen was isolated in 69% of confirmed infection cases. MRSA was identified in 42% of staphylococcal isolates. Overall, gram-negative bacteria predominated (56% vs. 44% gram-positive), with P. aeruginosa and E. coli leading, followed by A. baumannii. [18]. Characteristically, most of the patients were late presenters (median 5 to > 6 months).
A separate study of Syrian refugees in Jordan with post-traumatic infections (20% of whom had osteomyelitis; more than half had metal implants) mainly used deep wound swabs. Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in 97% of the cases; 66% were MDR, and approximately 37% exhibited carbapenem-resistance [19] (Table 1).
Additional microbiological data indicate variable rates of ESBL producers in Syria. Estimates range from 26% [20] to 52% in E.coli urine isolates in community and hospital settings [21,22]. In 3 hospitals in Aleppo, the proportion of MDR E.coli reached 63% [22]. Prior exposure to third-generation cephalosporin and quinolones, along with hospitalization and use of a urine catheter, were recognized as risk factors for a subsequent infection by ESBL E.coli [22]. Another report showed that 66% of ESBL producers (including E. coli and K. pneumoniae) exhibited a ciprofloxacin-resistance phenotype [23]. Relevant data for P. aeruginosa isolated in urinary and respiratory samples in a hospital setting, revealed high resistance rates; for example, susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, amikacin, cefepime, and ceftazidime was approximately 29.2%, 27%, 42.8%, 21.7%, and 28.6%, respectively [24]. The overall percentage of MDR P. aeruginosa was 54% [24]. Nonetheless, relatively good susceptibility rates to imipenem (56.1%) and meropenem (59.1%) were recorded [24].
Data retrieved from host countries (in refugee camps or treating hospitals) further inform the MDR epidemiology during the civil war (Table 1). In two Israeli hospitals admitting Syrian civilians, the proportion of MDR pathogens was 66% in children and 47% in adults [25]. Among the 28 adult patients with MDR isolates, 5 had carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (2 harboring NDM), 11 had MRSA, 5 had A. baumannii, and 7 had ESBL producers [25]. Relevant data for children revealed that 20 among 21 cases with MDR Gram (-) pathogens were ESBL producers [25]. The first report of CRAB producing only NDM was isolated from wounded civilians in Lebanon in 2012 [26]. In one Israeli screening of 107 Syrian injured or ill children, 83% had carriage of MDR organisms; 9% carried CRE (7/10 NDM, 3/10 OXA-48), 3% VRE, 5% MRSA, 7% MDR A. baumannii, and 78% ESBL (95% E. coli) [27]. CRE and MDR A. baumannii were only susceptible to colistin [27]. Nineteen percent of these patients later developed MDR infections (mostly ESBL); importantly, 58% of those infections were caused by the same species as their carriage isolates [27].

Data from Lebanon

Lebanon has experienced recurrent conflicts since 1975, beginning with the civil war (1975–1978) and later the war with Israel. In parallel, as with other neighboring countries, the health system has also been burdened with caring for displaced populations, particularly during the U.S.-led “War on Terror” [7]. Between 1975 and 1984, data from more than 1,000 patients (civilians and military personnel) with head and neck war-related injuries showed an infection rate of 12%. S. aureus was the most prevalent pathogen, followed by P. aeruginosa and E. coli [28]. Sepsis was reported as the second leading cause of death after hemorrhage, responsible for 2.1% of fatalities [29].
Since 1984 and up to 2006, there is a lack of publishing data. During the war with Israel, prospective data from 350 trauma patients (2006–2012), all treated with surgical debridement and antibiotics, indicated an infection rate of ~20%. P. aeruginosa was the leading pathogen (30.5%), followed by other gram-negative organisms (52.5%; including Acinetobacter spp., E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Proteus, and Enterobacter spp.), and gram-positive pathogens (17%; including CNS and Enterococcus spp.) [30]. In 2012, NDM-1–producing K. pneumoniae and E. coli were reported for the first time in Lebanon, in patients admitted from Iraq [31]; during that period, it was the first time that carbapenem-resistant strains of A.baumannii expressing the blaNDM-1 gene were isolated from wounded civilians of the Syrian war [26]. Between 2009-2012, the molecular analysis of A.baumannii detected blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-24for the first time in the country [32]. From 2011 to 2013, among 116 isolates of A.baumannii retrieved from wounded Lebanese and Syrian war patients, 60% had a carbapenem-resistant phenotype [33]; blaOXA-23was the predominant mechanism (found in 65 from 70 isolates), while 5 isolates were NDM-1 producers [33].
More recent data from the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) Weapon Traumatology Training Center in Lebanon (2016–2019) analyzed specimens from 672 patients with war-related injuries, including skin and soft tissue samples and bone biopsies. These data mix patients from Lebanon, Syria, Palestine, and Yemen [34]. S.aureus was the most common pathogen (49.1%), followed by Enterobacterales (28.5%), P. aeruginosa (13.2%), Enterococci spp. (3.2%), and A.baumannii (2%) [34]. More than half of the isolates were MDR (n=186); the highest proportion of multi-drug resistance was observed in Enterobacterales and S. aureus (n=83, 44.6% of the total MDR, for each one) followed by P.aeruginosa (7.6%) [34]. MRSA accounted for 48.5% of the total S.aureus strains and was more likely to be isolated in bone samples [34]. Resistance rates in Enterobacterales were high: >50% resistant to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins and piperacillin-tazobactam, while resistance to imipenem (4%) and meropenem (10.1%) remained low [34]. Ciprofloxacin resistance was >40%, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance ~60% [34]. For P. aeruginosa, resistance rates were 24% to aminoglycosides, 17.4% to ceftazidime, 26.1% to cefepime, 21.7% to piperacillin-tazobactam, and 19.6% to aztreonam. Carbapenem resistance ranged from 14.7% (imipenem) to 23.9% (meropenem)(34).

Data from the Occupied Territories of Palestine

The Gaza Strip has experienced prolonged conflict and blockade, resulting in chronic shortages of food, medicine, energy, and healthcare access [35]. Although the West Bank maintains a network with Jordan for medical support and healthcare access, both territories suffer from an under-resourced healthcare system [35] with limited staff and equipment [36]. These conditions contributed to the emergence of AMR even before the escalation of hostilities in October 2023 [35]. A systematic review of AMR in the occupied Palestinian territories (West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza) reported overall rates of ~27% for both MRSA and ESBL-producing organisms in human samples [35]. Among ESBL producers, ~6% displayed carbapenem resistance, E. coli ESBL prevalence increased over time, and ~8% of Acinetobacter isolates were carbapenem-resistant (A. baumannii, CRAB) [35].
In Gaza, a decade ago, a cross-sectional study of clinical, environmental, and air samples showed carbapenem resistance in 12.1% of gram-negative isolates, particularly from intensive care units; Klebsiella spp. was the most frequent carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales [37]. More recently in 2022, a cross-sectional study showed the presence of Pseudomonas spp. in more than half of the water samples from primary healthcare settings in Gaza, with high resistance to imipenem and piperacillin; the NDM gene was detected in over a quarter of them [38]. Contaminated water supplies may therefore act as reservoirs for resistant pathogens and contribute to community AMR spread.
Clinical data highlight a substantial MDR burden. In osteomyelitis cases, MRSA accounted for 65% of S. aureus isolates; 30% of gram-negatives were ESBL producers, and ~25% of Enterobacterales were carbapenem-resistant(36). At Al-Nasser Pediatric Hospital (2021), ESBL-producing gram-negatives were identified in ~59% of isolates (mainly from urine, followed by pus, blood, and sputum), exceeding earlier reports [39,40]. The same study recorded for the first time in the Gaza Strip the presence of bla KPC-2 in K. pneumoniae from the pediatric population [39].
Analysis of fecal and rectal carriage, which is thought as a way for transmission of resistance both in community and healthcare settings, revealed ESBL-producers in 37% of the samples (including specimens from community health centers and hospitals). The majority were E.coli (52.8%), followed by K. pneumoniae (39.1%), Citrobacter freundii (26.7%), Proteus mirabilis (2.8%), and K. aerogenes (2.1%) [41]. Notably, K. pneumoniae with an ESBL phenotype was also observed in the community, suggesting spread beyond healthcare settings [41]. The dominant resistant mechanisms were blaCTX-M , followed by blaTEM and blaSHV [41]. A prospective study analyzing human samples from a pediatric and a tertiary hospital before October 2023 supported that 40% of the K.pneumoniae isolates from blood cultures had a carbapenem-resistant profile, with the vast majority producing metallo-β-lactamases (MBL), followed by a small proportion of OXA-48 [42].

Data from Ukraine

Ukraine has faced armed conflict since 2014, escalating dramatically after the 2022 Russian invasion [43]. From 2014–2020, data from war-injured patients in Eastern Ukraine military hospitals showed high carbapenem resistance: 67.9% of A. baumannii (class A/D β-lactamases), 55.6% of P. aeruginosa (class A/B/D β-lactamases, including RmtB4), 42.9% of E. coli, and 32.8% of K. pneumoniae (mostly class A/D β-lactamases, with rare blaNDM-1 [44]. Genomic analysis confirmed that A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa strains isolated pre- and post-2022 were genetically related, suggesting continuity of resistant lineages across a decade of conflict [43].
In 2022, samples from burn, wound, and fracture patients revealed meropenem resistance in 58% overall, including Klebsiella spp. (76%), A. baumannii (73%), P. aeruginosa (57%), and Enterobacter spp. (18%) [45]. Approximately half of the strains were resistant to cefiderocol (78% of Enterobacterales, 38% of P.aeruginosa, 24% of A.baumannii ) [45]. Resistance to newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations was alarmingly high: ceftazidime-avibactam (80%), ceftolozane-tazobactam (95%), imipenem-relebactam (84%), and meropenem-vaborbactam (80%) [45].
A large 2023–2024 hospital dataset (>6800 isolates) confirmed high resistance rates: K. pneumoniae was most prevalent (>50% ESBL-positive, up to 60% carbapenem-resistant, and 28% pan-drug resistant). Acinetobacter spp. showed >75% carbapenem resistance and 37% pan-drug resistance, exceeding global averages [46]. Emerging mechanisms include MBL-producing P. aeruginosa with limited treatment options. In one series, 8/12 isolates produced MBLs (4 NDM only, 1 IMP only, 1 NDM/OXA-48, 1 NDM/IMP, 1 KPC/NDM). All remained colistin-susceptible; most were cefiderocol-susceptible [47]. Similarly, wound-related A. baumannii isolates were 95% MDR, 17.6% XDR, and 76.5% carbapenem-resistant, mainly via blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-72 [48].
Surveillance from the Netherlands on Ukrainian patients (March–December 2022) identified blaNDM as the main driver of resistance to last-resort drugs, including ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, imipenem-relebactam, and aminoglycosides [49]. A parallel study confirmed that dominant resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales were NDM/OXA-48-like and NDM, with KPC less frequent. In A. baumannii, NDM and OXA-23-like were dominant, while in P. aeruginosa NDM was most common [50]. Early-onset infections (<7 days) were more often carbapenemase-positive, suggesting community/field acquisition, whereas later-onset cases likely reflected nosocomial spread [50].

Discussion

Wound infections account for a significant proportion of war-related infections. Early after injury, gram-positive organisms tend to predominate; as time passes, gram-negative pathogens increasingly drive morbidity, in line with trauma microbiology from Middle Eastern conflicts [7]. According to data based on the WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS), the antimicrobial resistance in the Eastern Mediterranean Region is higher than the global average [51]. A meta-analysis focusing on GLASS Priority Pathogens exclusively in conflict zones of the Eastern Mediterranean Region showed that S.aureus was the predominant pathogen isolated [52]. Despite the heterogeneity and low quality of data, it is worth mentioning that the proportion of MRSA was 55.6% of the total S.aureus isolates; among gram-negative pathogens with carbapenem-resistance profile, the most prevalent was A. baumannii (60.3%), followed by P.aeruginosa and K.pneumoniae with a proportion of approximately 22% and 12%, respectively [52]. The recorded ceftriaxone resistance proportion for E.coli and K. pneumoniae was 76% and approximately 81%, respectively [52]. These figures align with country-level reports across Syria and Lebanon, and mirror the historically observed shift toward late, gram-negative, often device- or hospital-associated infections in protracted conflicts [7,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34].
When conflict vs. non-conflict settings in the Middle East are compared, one synthesis suggested similarly high carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter spp. in both contexts (78% vs. 72.7%) [53] underscoring the fact that AMR pressure is not confined to battlefields alone. However, data for K. pneumoniae were sparse; where available, carbapenem resistance was ~15% without a clear conflict effect, whereas ESBL prevalence was markedly higher in conflict zones (75.5% vs. 22.5%) [53]. Together with our regional summaries, this suggests that conflict amplifies transmission opportunities and selection pressures (overcrowding, antimicrobial overuse, disrupted IPC/WASH), particularly for ESBL and non-fermenters, even where baseline resistance is already high [6,52,53].
Human displacement is a critical accelerant. In the background of the new conflicts unravelling in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Global Trends Report for 2024 reported a growing trend of people forced to flee over the last decade [54]. For 2024, more than 120 million people were displaced, representing 1 human in every 64 worldwide, with the vast majority coming from low- and middle-income countries [54]. This intensification of human displacement could function as a catalyst for the rapid inter-regional spread of multidrug-resistant pathogens emerging from war zones to the host countries.
The Ukrainian data summarized are particularly concerning: high meropenem resistance across Enterobacterales and non-fermenters, substantial resistance to newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and MBL dominance (especially NDM) in Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa, with OXA-23/-72 in A. baumannii [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. These patterns differ from many non-conflicts European settings and complicate empiric therapy and infection control (45, 49, 50). European guidance has therefore weighed targeted screening and isolation when patients were recently hospitalized in Ukrainian facilities [55] consistent with evidence that prior hospitalization in Ukraine predicts carriage of carbapenemase-producing organisms [49].
Conflict-driven determinants are now well characterized: breakdown of hygiene and IPC; damage to water and sewage systems; interruptions in vaccination; workforce depletion and training gaps; and heavy, often empiric, broad-spectrum antibiotic use [6]. These factors promote both colonization and clinical infection by MDR organisms and make mass-casualty care particularly vulnerable to nosocomial transmission [56]. The Gaza findings exemplify several of these pathways: carbapenem-resistant gram-negatives in clinical and environmental samples [37], MDR Pseudomonas carrying NDM in primary-care water sources [38], high ESBL burdens in pediatric hospitals and community carriage [39,40,41], and MBL-mediated carbapenem resistance in bloodstream K. pneumoniae [42]. Such water- and infrastructure-linked reservoirs plausibly sustain community-healthcare transmission loops and widen the AMR footprint [36,37,38,39,40,41].
Yet the very environments that generate AMR also undermine surveillance. Conflict zones report fewer bloodstream infections per million inhabitants (a proxy for under-ascertainment) and conduct less systematic surveillance than non-conflict comparators [57]. However, the active surveillance with screening for MDR and consequently, contact isolation of patients is encouraged since evidence supports, for example, the decrease of carriage of A.baumannii or a stable proportion of MRSA by the implementation of such measures [58].
On the ground, problems include damaged facilities, unsafe transport of specimens, reagent stock-outs, and loss of skilled personnel [6]. Coverage gaps in GLASS and national systems are substantial: Gaza is under-represented relative to the West Bank; parts of Iraq and Syria have minimal or geographically skewed participation. For instance, in 2021, areas of Iraq were not included in the AMR strategy, while poor geographical representation was also observed in the case of Syria, where most of the data retrieved from the host countries, such as Lebanon or Jordan, that admitted refugees [59]. At the same time, the collapse of infrastructure jeopardizes access to surveillance sites [59]. Additional challenges are the lack of functional laboratories providing reliable diagnosis, as in the case of Afghanistan, where only 28% of the hospitals with operating laboratories, as well as the limited access to essential antibiotics, such as in the case of Iraq [59]. The result is fragmented, methodologically heterogeneous data—with small samples, inconsistent case definitions (including MDR/XDR), varied specimen sources (e.g., deep tissue vs. swabs), and unclear separation of colonization vs. infection—limiting comparability and trending [52,59].
Despite these limitations, several pragmatic implications emerge:
  • Early IPC & WASH restoration are core clinical interventions. Immediate investment in clean water, sanitation, cohorting, decontamination workflows, and basic surgical infection prevention can reduce late gram-negative burdens [6,56,59].
  • Targeted screening and isolation policies should be risk-based. For patients with recent hospitalization in high-AMR conflict settings (e.g., Ukraine), admission screening for CRE/CRAB and contact precautions are justified [49,50,55,58].
  • Antibiotic stewardship must be feasible and field-adapted. Given high ESBL/MBL prevalence and frequent resistance to newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors in Ukrainian cohorts, empiric regimens and escalation pathways should be locally calibrated and rapidly revised as resistance data accrue [45,49,50,56].
  • Surveillance needs minimum viable standards. Even in austere settings, standardized case definitions, simple antibiogram reporting, sentinel blood-culture capacity, and referral networks can yield actionable data [57,59]. Where possible, it is important to harmonize MDR/XDR definitions and distinguish colonization vs. infection to enable cross-study comparison [52,57,59].
  • Environmental monitoring can be high-yield. Incorporating water system surveillance (e.g., for Pseudomonas and Enterobacterales carbapenemases) into humanitarian WASH assessments may identify remediable reservoirs [38,59].
  • Global health security link. Cross-border spread documented among repatriated casualties and refugees argues for joined-up AMR preparedness between origin and host countries—laboratory twinning, data sharing, and surge procurement for diagnostics and last-resort agents [14,49,55,59].
In conclusion, conflict acts as a force multiplier for AMR by amplifying transmission opportunities, selection pressure, and healthcare fragmentation. While current evidence is limited by heterogeneity, under-reporting, and variable methodology [52,57,59], the convergent signals—high MRSA, dominant CRAB, rising ESBL with CTX-M, and MBL-driven carbapenem resistance in key hubs—support immediate, context-appropriate action across IPC/WASH, stewardship, targeted screening, and lean surveillance systems [6,51,52,53,56,59]. Careful interpretation remains essential, but inaction while awaiting for perfect data risks entrenching patterns that will be far harder—and costlier—to reverse.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org.

Abbreviation List

AMR antimicrobial resistance
CNS coagulase-negative staphylococci
CRAB Acinetobacter baumanii resistant to carbapenems
CRE Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales
ECDC European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
ESBL Extended-spectrum β-lactamase
GDP global gross domestic product
GLASS WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System
MBL metallo-β-lactamase
MDR multi-drug resistant
MSF Médecins Sans Frontières
NDM New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM),
VRE Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci
UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

References

  1. Murray CJL, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Robles Aguilar G, Gray A, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. The Lancet. 2022 Feb;399(10325):629–55. [CrossRef]
  2. Poudel AN, Zhu S, Cooper N, Little P, Tarrant C, Hickman M, et al. The economic burden of antibiotic resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Karunasagar I, editor. PLoS ONE. 2023 May 8;18(5):e0285170. [CrossRef]
  3. Nelson RE, Hatfield KM, Wolford H, Samore MH, Scott RD, Reddy SC, et al. National Estimates of Healthcare Costs Associated With Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections Among Hospitalized Patients in the United States. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2021 Jan 29;72(Supplement_1):S17–26.
  4. World Bank Group. Drug-resistant infections. A Threat to Our Economic Future [Internet]. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; 2017. Available from: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/323311493396993758/pdf/final-report.pdf.
  5. World Health Organization. 2024 WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240093461.
  6. Abbara A, Shortall C, Sullivan R, Zwijnenburg W, Moussally K, Aboshamr R, et al. Unravelling the linkages between conflict and antimicrobial resistance. npj Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Apr 12;3(1):29. [CrossRef]
  7. Sahli ZT, Bizri AR, Abu-Sittah GS. Microbiology and risk factors associated with war-related wound infections in the Middle East. Epidemiol Infect. 2016 Oct;144(13):2848–57.
  8. Abou Fayad A, Rizk A, El Sayed S, Kaddoura M, Jawad NK, Al-Attar A, et al. Antimicrobial resistance and the Iraq wars: armed conflict as an underinvestigated pathway with growing significance. BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jan;7(Suppl 8):e010863. [CrossRef]
  9. Sadeghi E. Type, Frequency, and Antimicrobial Sensitivity Pattern of Bacteria in an Iranian Hospital During the 1980s. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1990 May 1;12(3):543–6.
  10. Aarabi B. Comparative Study of Bacteriological Contamination between Primary and Secondary Exploration of Missile Head Wounds: Neurosurgery. 1987 Apr;20(4):610–6.
  11. Johnson EN, Burns TC, Hayda RA, Hospenthal DR, Murray CK. Infectious Complications of Open Type III Tibial Fractures among Combat Casualties. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2007 Aug 15;45(4):409–15.
  12. Yun HC, Murray CK, Roop SA, Hospenthal DR, Gourdine E, Dooley DP. Bacteria Recovered from Patients Admitted to a Deployed U.S. Military Hospital in Baghdad, Iraq. Military Medicine. 2006 Sep;171(9):821–5.
  13. Kaspar RL, Griffith ME, Mann PB, Lehman DJ, Conger NG, Hospenthal DR, et al. Association of Bacterial Colonization at the Time of Presentation to a Combat Support Hospital in a Combat Zone With Subsequent 30-Day Colonization or Infection. Military Medicine. 2009 Sep;174(9):899–903. [CrossRef]
  14. Turton JF, Kaufmann ME, Gill MJ, Pike R, Scott PT, Fishbain J, et al. Comparison of Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates from the United Kingdom and the United States That Were Associated with Repatriated Casualties of the Iraq Conflict. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Jul;44(7):2630–4. [CrossRef]
  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Acinetobacter baumannii infections among patients at military medical facilities treating injured U.S. service members, 2002-2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004 Nov 19;53(45):1063–6.
  16. Petersen K, Riddle MS, Danko JR, Blazes DL, Hayden R, Tasker SA, et al. Trauma-related Infections in Battlefield Casualties From Iraq. Annals of Surgery. 2007 May;245(5):803–11.
  17. Abbara A, Rawson TM, Karah N, El-Amin W, Hatcher J, Tajaldin B, et al. A summary and appraisal of existing evidence of antimicrobial resistance in the Syrian conflict. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2018 Oct;75:26–33.
  18. Teicher CL, Ronat JB, Fakhri RM, Basel M, Labar AS, Herard P, et al. Antimicrobial Drug–Resistant Bacteria Isolated from Syrian War–Injured Patients, August 2011–March 2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Nov;20(11):1949–51.
  19. Abbara A, Al-Harbat N, Karah N, Abo-Yahya B, El-Amin W, Hatcher J, et al. Antimicrobial Drug Resistance among Refugees from Syria, Jordan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 May;23(5):885–6.
  20. Baaity Z, Almahmoud I, Khamis A. Prevalence of Extended Spectrum β Lactamases (ESBL) in E. coli at Al-Assad Teaching Hospital. Rese Jour of Pharm and Technol. 2017;10(7):2433.
  21. Al-Assil B, Mahfoud M, Hamzeh AR. First report on class 1 integrons and Trimethoprim-resistance genes from dfrA group in uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) from the Aleppo area in Syria. Mobile Genetic Elements. 2013 May 24;3(3):e25204. [CrossRef]
  22. Al-Assil B, Mahfoud M, Hamzeh AR. Resistance trends and risk factors of extended spectrum β-lactamases in Escherichia coli infections in Aleppo, Syria. American Journal of Infection Control. 2013 Jul;41(7):597–600.
  23. Alheib O, Al Kayali R, Abajy MY. Prevalence of Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance (PMQR) Determinants Among Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBL)-Producing Isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Aleppo, Syria. Arch Clin Infect Dis [Internet]. 2015 Jul 25 [cited 2025 Aug 7];10(3). Available from: https://brieflands.com/articles/archcid-20941.html.
  24. Mahfoud M, Al Najjar M, Hamzeh AR. Multidrug resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from nosocomial respiratory and urinary infections in Aleppo, Syria. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015 Feb 19;9(02):210–3. [CrossRef]
  25. Peretz A, Labay K, Zonis Z, Glikman D. Disengagement Does Not Apply to Bacteria: A High Carriage Rate of Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens Among Syrian Civilians Treated in Israeli Hospitals. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2014 Sep 1;59(5):753–4. [CrossRef]
  26. Rafei R, Dabboussi F, Hamze M, Eveillard M, Lemarié C, Mallat H, et al. First report of blaNDM-1-producing Acinetobacter baumannii isolated in Lebanon from civilians wounded during the Syrian war. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2014 Apr;21:21–3.
  27. Kassem DF, Hoffmann Y, Shahar N, Ocampo S, Salomon L, Zonis Z, et al. Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens in Hospitalized Syrian Children. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Jan;23(1):166–8.
  28. Zaytoun GM, Shikhani AH, Salman SD. Head and neck war injuries: 10-year experience at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. Laryngoscope. 1986 Aug;96(8):899–903.
  29. Nassoura Z, Hajj H, Dajani O, Jabbour N, Ismail M, Tarazi T, et al. Trauma Management in a War Zone: The Lebanese War Experience: The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 1991 Dec;31(12):1596–9. [CrossRef]
  30. Fares Y, El-Zaatari M, Fares J, Bedrosian N, Yared N. Trauma-related infections due to cluster munitions. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2013 Dec;6(6):482–6. [CrossRef]
  31. El-Herte RI, Araj GF, Matar GM, Baroud M, Kanafani ZA, Kanj SS. Detection of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae producing NDM-1 in Lebanon. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2012 Jan 27;6(05):457–61. [CrossRef]
  32. Rafei R, Dabboussi F, Hamze M, Eveillard M, Lemarié C, Gaultier MP, et al. Molecular Analysis of Acinetobacter baumannii Strains Isolated in Lebanon Using Four Different Typing Methods. Hakami RM, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e115969.
  33. Rafei R, Pailhoriès H, Hamze M, Eveillard M, Mallat H, Dabboussi F, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Acinetobacter baumannii in different hospitals in Tripoli, Lebanon using bla OXA-51-like sequence based typing. BMC Microbiol. 2015 Dec;15(1):103.
  34. Yaacoub S, Truppa C, Pedersen TI, Abdo H, Rossi R. Antibiotic resistance among bacteria isolated from war-wounded patients at the Weapon Traumatology Training Center of the International Committee of the Red Cross from 2016 to 2019: a secondary analysis of WHONET surveillance data. BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Dec;22(1):257.
  35. Kumar R, Tanous O, Mills D, Wispelwey B, Asi Y, Hammoudeh W, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in a protracted war setting: a review of the literature from Palestine. Ishaq SL, editor. mSystems. 2025 Jun 17;10(6):e01679-24. [CrossRef]
  36. Moussally K, Abu-Sittah G, Gomez FG, Fayad AA, Farra A. Antimicrobial resistance in the ongoing Gaza war: a silent threat. The Lancet. 2023 Nov;402(10416):1972–3.
  37. Rida RH, Al Laham NA, Elmanama AA. Carbapenem resistance among clinical and environmental Gram-negative isolates recovered from hospitals in Gaza strip, Palestine. Germs. 2018 Sep 3;8(3):147–54.
  38. Abu-Shomar R, Zeitoun M, Abbara A, Elmanama A. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas isolated from water at primary health care centers in Gaza, Palestine: a cross-sectional study. IJID Regions. 2025 Jun;15:100671. [CrossRef]
  39. El Aila NA, Al Laham NA, Doijad SP, Imirzalioglu C, Mraheil MA. First report of carbapenems encoding multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria from a pediatric hospital in Gaza Strip, Palestine. BMC Microbiol. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):393.
  40. El Aila NA, Al Laham NA, Ayesh BM. Prevalence of extended spectrum beta lactamase and molecular detection of blaTEM, blaSHV and blaCTX-M genotypes among Gram negative bacilli isolates from pediatric patient population in Gaza strip. BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 20;23(1):99.
  41. El Aila NA, Laham NAA, Ayesh BM, Naas T. Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing enterobacterales from hospitals and community settings in Gaza Strip, Palestine. BMC Microbiol. 2023 Nov 30;23(1):376.
  42. Laham NA, Afifi AA, Mellmann A, Schaumburg F. Characterization of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from blood cultures in Gaza Strip hospitals, Palestine. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2025 Mar;318:151645.
  43. Lebreton F, Kondratiuk V, Kovalchuk V, Pfennigwerth N, Luo TL, Jones BT, et al. High genetic relatedness between multidrug resistant bacteria before and after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Genome Med. 2025 Jul 1;17(1):74. [CrossRef]
  44. Kondratiuk V, Jones BT, Kovalchuk V, Kovalenko I, Ganiuk V, Kondratiuk O, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of antibiotic resistance in military hospital-associated bacteria from war injuries in the Eastern Ukraine conflict between 2014 and 2020. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2021 Jun;112:69–76.
  45. Ljungquist O, Nazarchuk O, Kahlmeter G, Andrews V, Koithan T, Wasserstrom L, et al. Highly multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections in war victims in Ukraine, 2022. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2023 Jul;23(7):784–6.
  46. Uren H, Aliieva N, Matolinets N, Hemsley C, Holcomb JB, Samchuk O, et al. Cumulative antibiogram results of over 6800 diagnostic isolates from the First Lviv Territorial Medical Union, Ukraine. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2025 Apr;25(4):e200–1. [CrossRef]
  47. Pallett SJC, Morkowska A, Woolley SD, O’Shea MK, Moore LSP, Moshynets O. Severe conflict-associated wound infections complicated by the discovery of carbapenemase-coproducing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Ukraine. The Lancet Microbe. 2025 Apr;6(4):101046.
  48. Kondratiuk VM, Jones BT, Luo TL, Fomina NS, Lebreton F, Bennett JW, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from combat wounds in Ukraine during 2022 and 2023. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance. 2025 Jul 2;7(4):dlaf140.
  49. Verkaik NJ, Wielders CCH, Den Boer H, Langerak D, Vogel M, Witteveen S, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility to last-resort antibiotics in carbapenemase-producing bacteria from Ukrainian patients. Papp-Wallace KM, editor. Microbiol Spectr [Internet]. 2024 Nov 5 [cited 2025 Jul 23];12(11). Available from: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.01142-24.
  50. Pallett SJC, Morkowska A, Woolley SD, Potochilova VV, Rudnieva KL, Iungin OS, et al. Evolving antimicrobial resistance of extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative severe infections associated with conflict wounds in Ukraine: an observational study. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe. 2025 May;52:101274. [CrossRef]
  51. World Health Organisation Eastern Mediterranean Region. Statement by the Regional Director at the World Antimicrobial Resistance Awareness Week 2023 press conference. [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https:// www. emro. who. int/ media/ news/ state ment- by- the- regio nal- direc tor- at- the- world- antim icrob ial- resis tance- aware ness- week- 2023- pressconfe rence. html.
  52. Wild A, Shortall C, Dewachi O, Naim C, Green A, Hussain S, et al. Conflict-associated wounds and burns infected with GLASS pathogens in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A systematic review. BMC Infect Dis [Internet]. 2025 Feb 7 [cited 2025 Jul 10];25(1). Available from: https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-025-10569-3. [CrossRef]
  53. Truppa C, Abo-Shehada MN. Antimicrobial resistance among GLASS pathogens in conflict and non-conflict affected settings in the Middle East: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;20(1):936.
  54. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Mid-year Trends [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/mid-year-trends.
  55. European Center for Disease Prevention and Control. Antimicrobial resistance in the EU/EEA (EARS-Net) Annual Epidemiological Report for 2023 [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/antimicrobial-resistance-annual-epidemiological-report-EARS-Net-2023.pdf.
  56. Granata G, Petersen E, Capone A, Donati D, Andriolo B, Gross M, et al. The impact of armed conflict on the development and global spread of antibiotic resistance: a systematic review. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2024 Jul;30(7):858–65.
  57. Moghnieh R, Bizri N, Abdallah D, Sayegh MH. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance and trends in armed conflict, fragile, and non-conflict countries of the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Infect Dis Poverty. 2025 Feb 28;14(1):14. [CrossRef]
  58. Murray CK, Yun HC, Griffith ME, Thompson B, Crouch HK, Monson LS, et al. Recovery of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria From Combat Personnel Evacuated From Iraq and Afghanistan at a Single Military Treatment Facility. Military Medicine. 2009 Jun;174(6):598–604.
  59. MSF. The Broken Lens: Antimicrobial Resistance in Humanitarian Settings [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.msf.org/broken-lens-antimicrobial-resistance-humanitarian-settings.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated