Submitted:
25 September 2025
Posted:
26 September 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- By preventing the formation of pyrolysis residues, the surface of the recovered fillers is accessible by the elastomer phase, thus promoting reinforcing behaviour.
- The biogenic carbon contained within the feedstock is recovered in the TPO and gas phases where it adds value by reducing scope 1 emissions when using these materials directly, or after refinement, as fuels.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Tyre Granulate Preparation and Characterisation
2.2. rCB Materials Preparation
2.3. rCB Materials Preparation
2.4. In-Rubber Characterisation
- Tensile properties were determined using a Llyod LR5K following ASTM D412 [38].
- Shore A Hardness was determined using a Wallace H17A in accordance with ASTM D2240 [39].
- Filler dispersion was assessed by examining surfaces cut with fresh razor blades at 250x magnification using a Hitachi TM3030 Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Surface roughness plots and average surface roughness (Ra) values were generated using 3D-Image Viewer software (Denshi Kougaku Kenkyusyo Co. Ltd.).
- Strain sweeps were conducted using a Perkin-Elmer DM8000 configured in tension mode. 2x2x10mm specimens were tested at 40 oC, 10 Hz, and a double strain amplitude (DSA) range of ~0.04 to 4%.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Feedstock Characterisation
3.2. rCB Characterisation
3.3. In-Rubber Characterisation



4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| rCB | Recovered carbon black |
| TPO | Tyre pyrolysis oil |
| CB | Carbon black |
| VM | Volatile Matter |
| FC | Fixed Carbon |
| HCR | High carbonaceous residue |
| BET | Brunauer-Emmett-Teller |
| TGA | Thermogravimetric analysis |
| ICP-OES | Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer |
| EDX | Energy dispersive X-ray |
| S/TEM | Scanning/transmission electron microscope |
| MDR | Moving die rheometer |
| SEM | Scanning electron microscope |
References
- Zerin, N.H., et al. End-of-life tyre conversion to energy: A review on pyrolysis and activated carbon production processes and their challenges. Sci. Total Environ 2023, 905, 166981. [CrossRef]
- European Commission, The European Green Deal, COM(2019) 640 final, Brussels, 2019.
- Banar, M. Life cycle assessment of waste tire pyrolysis. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2015, 24, 1215.
- Briones-Hidrovo, A., et al. Recovering carbon black from end-of-life tires: A consequential life cycle assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2025, 115, 108044. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y., et al. Microwave Absorption Characteristics of Tire. In Characterization of Minerals, Metals, and Materials; Carpenter, J.S., et al. Springer, Cham: Hoboken, USA, 2015; pp. 235–243.
- Garcia, D.B., et al. Green rubber composites, Chapter 14. In Green Sustainable Process for Chemical and Environmental Engineering and Science; Altalhi, T., Inamuddin. Elsevier: 2022; pp. 273-312.
- ASTM D8178-20 Standard Terminology Relating to Recovered Carbon Black (rCB), 2020.
- Norris, C.J., Lopez-Cerdan, A., ter Haar, P. Understanding Recovered Carbon Black. Rubber Chem. Technol. 2023, 96, 196. [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Z., et al. Material recovery and recycling of waste tyres – A review. Cleaner Materials 2022, 5, 100115. [CrossRef]
- Martinez, J.D., et al. Waste tyre pyrolysis – A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 23, 179.
- Hoyer, S., Kroll, L., Sykutera, D. Technology comparison for the production of fine rubber powder from end of life tyres. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 43, 193. [CrossRef]
- Valentini, F., Pegoretti, A. End-of-life options of tyres. A review. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2022, 5, 203. [CrossRef]
- Bowles, A.J., Fowler, G.D. Assessing the impacts of feedstock and process control on pyrolysis outputs for tyre recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 182, 106277. [CrossRef]
- Union, T. Regulation (EU) 2020/740 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 2020 on the labelling of tyres with respect to fuel efficiency and other parameters, amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1222/2009. Official Journal of the European Union, 2020.
- Bowles, A.J., Wilson, A.L., Fowler, G.D. Synergistic benefits of recovered carbon black demineralisation for tyre recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 198, 107124. [CrossRef]
- Silva, C., et al. Recovered carbon black: A comprehensive review of activation, demineralization, and incorporation in rubber matrices. Carbon Resour. Convers. 2025, 100334.
- Moulin, L., et al. Assessment of Recovered Carbon Black Obtained by Waste Tires Steam Water Thermolysis: An Industrial Application. Waste Biomass Valor. 2017, 8, 2757. [CrossRef]
- Hewitt, N. Compounding Precipitated Silica in Elastomers, William Andrew Publishing, Norwich, NY, USA, 2007.
- Bridgestone & Michelin, Recovered Carbon Black Guidelines. 2023. Available online: https://business.michelinman.com/blog/articles/michelin-and-bridgestone-tackle-environmental-initiative (accessed on 26 August 2025).
- Norris, C.J., Hale, M., Bennett, M. Pyrolytic carbon: factors controlling in-rubber performance. Plast. Rubber Compos. 2014, 43, 245. [CrossRef]
- ASTM D1618-18 Standard Test Method for Carbon Black Extractables—Transmittance of Toluene Extract, 2018.
- ASTM D8474-23 Standard Test Method for Recovered Carbon Black (rCB)—Compositional Analysis by Thermogravimetry (TGA), 2023.
- Darmstadt, H., et al. Fractal Analysis of Commercial and Pyrolytic Carbon Blacks Using Nitrogen Adsorption Data. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1995, 68, 330. [CrossRef]
- Karthikeyan, S., Sathiskumar, C., Moorthy, R. Effect of process parameters on tire pyrolysis: a review. J. Sci. Ind. Res. India 2012, 71, 309.
- Darmstadt, H., Roy, C., Kaliaguine, S. ESCA characterisation of commercial carbon blacks and of carbon blacks from vacuum pyrolysis of used tires. Carbon 1994, 32, 1399. [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y., Wang, J., Yan, L. Surface character of pyrolytic carbon black. J. Chem. Ind. Eng. 2005, 56, 720.
- Pantea, D., et al. Heat-treatment of carbon blacks obtained by pyrolysis of used tires. Effect on the surface chemistry, porosity and electrical conductivity. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2003, 67, 55. [CrossRef]
- Darmstadt, H., et al. Surface energy of commercial and pyrolytic carbon blacks by inverse gas chromatography. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1997, 70, 759. [CrossRef]
- Chen, J., et al, Significant Influence of Bound Rubber Thickness on the Rubber Reinfrocement Effect, Polymers 2023, 15, 2051. [CrossRef]
- ASTM D6556-21 Standard Test Method for Carbon Black—Total and External Surface Area by Nitrogen Adsorption, 2021.
- ASTM WK87480 New Test Method for Dry Powder rCB Particle Size Analysis via Laser Diffraction. Available online: https://www.astm.org/membership-participation/technical-committees/workitems/workitem-wk87480 (accessed on 26 August 2025).
- ASTM D5230-21 Standard Test Method for Carbon Black—Automated Individual Pellet Hardness, 2021.
- ASTM D3849-22 Standard Test Method for Carbon Black-Morphological Characterization of Carbon Black Using Electron Microscopy, 2022.
- Grulke, E. A. et al. Size and Shape distributions of carbon lack aggregates by transmission electron microscopy, Carbon 2018, 130, 822. [CrossRef]
- ASTM D3191-10 Standard Test Methods for Carbon Black in SBR (Styrene-Butadiene Rubber)—Recipe and Evaluation Procedures, 2010.
- ASTM D8491-23 Standard Test Method for Recovered Carbon Black—Rheological Non-Linearity of a Rubber Compound by Fourier Transform Rheology, 2023.
- ASTM D5289-19a Standard Test Method for Rubber Property—Vulcanization Using Rotorless Cure Meters, 2019.
- ASTM D412 -16 Standard Test Methods for Vulcanized Rubber and Thermoplastic Elastomers—Tension, 2016.
- ASTM D2240-15 Standard Test Method for Rubber Property—Durometer Hardness, 2015.
- Hu, Y., et al. Waste tire valorization: Advanced technologies, process simulation, system optimization, and sustainability. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 942, 173561. [CrossRef]
- Czajczynska, D., et al. Waste tyre pyrolysis – Impact of the process on its products on the environment. TSEP 2020, 20, 100690. [CrossRef]
- Czajczynska, D., et al. Experimental investigation of waste tyres pyrolysis gas desulfurization through absorption in alkanolamines solutions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 52, 1006. [CrossRef]
- Tricas, N., et al. Influence of carbon black amorphous phase content on rubber filled compounds Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 1155. [CrossRef]
- Medalia, A.I. Effective degree of immobilization of rubber occluded within carbon black aggregates. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1972, 45, 1171. [CrossRef]
- Dannenberg, E.M. Bound rubber and carbon black reinforcement. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1986, 59, 512. [CrossRef]
- Hallett, J. Dispersion kinetics of carbonaceous materials during elastomer mixing. Proceedings of Tire Tech, Hannover, Germany, 2025.
- Payne, A.R. Dynamic mechanical properties of filler loaded vulcanisates. Rubber Plast. Age 1961, 42, 963.
- Norris, C.J., Lopez-Cerdan, A., Murfitt, M. Ash. Proceedings of Recovered Carbon Black, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2024.
- ASTM D1506-15 Standard Test Methods for Carbon Black—Ash Content, 2015.
- Costa, S., et al, Production and Upgrading of Recovered Carbon Black from the Pyrolysis of End-of-Life Tires, Materials 2022, 15, 2030. [CrossRef]
- Zainal, N., Halim, S. A review on demineralization, activation, and potential applications of the solid fraction obtained from the pyrolyzed waste tires. Cleaner Waste Systems 2025, 11, 100285. [CrossRef]




| Parameter | Unit | Truck Granulate | Car Granulate |
|---|---|---|---|
| VM Content | wt% | 64.7 (64.0→65.3) | 62.5 (61.8→63.0) |
| FC Content | wt% | 28.2 (27.6→28.8) | 24.5 (23.4→25.7) |
| Ash Content | wt% | 7.1 (6.5→7.8) | 13.1 (12.1→14.0) |
| Theoretical rCB Yield (FC + Ash) | wt% | 35.3 | 37.6 |
| Theoretical rCB Ash Content | wt% | 20.1 | 34.8 |
| Parameter | Unit | Truck rCB (Mi360HP) | Car rCB (Mi360+) |
Car rCB HCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured rCB Yield | wt% | 36 | 38 | 55 |
| Toluene Transmission | % | 98 | 99 | 100 |
| VM – TGA | wt% | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
| FC – TGA | wt% | 79.0 | 67.6 | 79.4 |
| Ash – TGA | wt% | 18.9 | 30.8 | 18.7 |
| Si – ICP | wt% | 3.7 | 9.1 | 7.0 |
| SiO2 – Calculated* | wt% | 7.9 | 19.5 | 15.0 |
| Zn – ICP | wt% | 5.0 | 3.5 | 2.5 |
| ZnS – Calculated* | wt% | 7.5 | 5.2 | 3.7 |
| BET Surface Area – Raw rCB | m2/g | 79.3 | 82.7 | 44.7 |
| BET Surface Area – rCB | m2/g | 89.9 | 85.8 | 75.0 |
| Milled Particle Size, d97 | µm | 10.3 | 9.5 | 10.3 |
| Average Pellet Hardness | gF | 33 | 35 | 39 |
| Parameter | Unit | N550 | Truck rCB (Mi360HP) | Car rCB (Mi360+) |
Car rCB HCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dispersion – Ra | µm | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.75 |
| Shore A Hardness | o | 80 | 78 | 76 | 70 |
| M100% | MPa | 8.38 | 8.51 | 5.08 | 4.74 |
| M200% | MPa | 17.92 | 17.39 | 11.72 | 10.72 |
| Break Stress | MPa | 21.6 | 21.3 | 17.1 | 13.6 |
| Break Strain | % | 252 | 247 | 296 | 303 |
| E’0 | MPa | 24.1 | 23.0 | 19.4 | 15.0 |
| E’∞ | MPa | 14.6 | 14.6 | 13.0 | 11.3 |
| ∆E’ | MPa | 9.5 | 8.4 | 6.4 | 3.8 |
| Tan δmax | - | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.16 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).