Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Phytochemical Compounds of Sumatra Camphor Oleoresin Originating from the West Coast of Sumatra, Indonesia

Submitted:

15 September 2025

Posted:

16 September 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Sumatra camphor (Dryobalanops aromatica Gaertn.) is a high-value non-timber forest product (NTFP) traditionally harvested by forest-dependent communities in northern Sumatra, Indonesia. Despite its extensive ethnobotanical utilization in medicinal and olfactory applications, scientific data on its phytochemical composition remain limited. This study aims to characterize the physical and phytochemical properties of Sumatra camphor oleoresin, collected from natural population in the Pakpak Bharat of Sumatra, one of few remaining endemic habitats for this vulnerable species. Using traditional oleoresin extraction methods, two fractions—camphor oil and aqueous camphor—were collected and analysed. Phytochemical identification was conducted using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. The analysis identified 79 compounds in camphor oil and 11 in the aqueous fraction, each with distinct profiles. Camphor oil was dominated by non-polar volatile compounds with pronounced olfactory properties and prospects bioactive activities, while aqueous camphor contained polar compounds such as carboxylic acids, esters, and alcohols, which have pharmacological and functional potential. These findings provide scientific evidence supporting the traditional utilization of Sumatran camphor and its bioactive potential for valorisation in plant-based cosmetic products, aromatherapy, and pharmaceutical industries. Furthermore, the results contribute to conservation-based bioeconomic strategies for managing Sumatra camphor sustainably as part of community-based forest management systems in Indonesia.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Indonesia is one of the world’s largest tropical forest ecosystems, with approximately 95,5 million hectares of forest cover—nearly half of the country’s land area [1]. This rich biodiversity supports thousands of vascular plant species—around 29,375 species, with approximately 60% endemism [2]. The history of national development in Indonesia is closely tied to forest management practices [3,4]. However, forest loss and degradation—amounting to tens of millions of hectares over the past two decades [1,5,6]—have undermined the ecosystem’s capacity to provide timber, non-timber forest products (NTFPs), and environmental services, contributing to socio-economic vulnerability among forest-dependent communities [3,4].
The Indonesian government has developed a forest management scheme that emphasises active community involvement, with NTFPs as the main commodity–as outlined in Minister of Forestry Regulation No. 35 of 2007. This initiative aims to combat the forest degradation rate by developing alternative local community income source from forest that does not involve cutting down trees [3,4,7]. Among various NTFP practices, camphor oleoresin extraction has long been a livelihood source of communities’ livelihood on the west coast of Sumatra.
Natural camphor oleoresin, also known locally as kapur barus, is an NTFP that has been commercially exploited, even before the Dutch East Indies period. Historical records from the colonial era indicate that this forest-derived product was primarily sourced from the Barus and Singkil regions, located along the western coastal area of Sumatra [8,9]. The oleoresin from Sumatran camphor tree (Dryobalanops aromatica Gaertn) has been used commercially as a medicinal ingredient, natural preservative, fragrance, and part of cultural rituals [9,10].
Due to the harvesting scheme that employs non-destructive methods, camphor oleoresin offers excellent potential in community-based forest management systems. However, in-depth scientific studies on the physical characteristics and phytochemical content of Sumatran camphor oleoresin are limited [9,11,12]. This contrasts with the extensive investigation on Cinnamomum camphora, a species originating from East Asia [9,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Different from the extraction process in C. camphora, where camphor oil is currently obtained from leaf distillation [13,14,15,16], in D. aromatica, camphor oleoresin is exuded through fluid flowing from the resin ducts in response to mechanical injury [9,10,19].
Sumatran camphor has been a highly prized global commodity since the seventh century [20]. Recognising the physical properties and phytochemical composition remains relevant, particularly for enhancing its pharmacological potential. These analyses allow the identification of active compounds with significant pharmacological and aromatic properties [14,16,17]. The increasing demand for natural bioactive compounds is driven by global health awareness [21,22]. Sumatran camphor, supported by traditional knowledge on ethnomedicinal applications, is a promising candidate for the development of future medicines, aromatherapy products, and cosmetics.
There is a growing need for this research, especially considering the conservation status of D. aromatica, which is classified as vulnerable, previously critically endangered by the IUCN Red List [9,11,12]. In natural habitat, this endemic species continues to experience population reductions due to pressures from deforestation, illegal logging, and land conversion, particularly in the tropical rainforests of Sumatra [9]. This situation calls for evidence-based conservation efforts, including an understanding of the phytochemical content of oleoresins, which serves as the basis for designing conservation strategies through a bioeconomic approach and sustainable NTFP management.
The objective of the study is to characterize the physical and phytochemical properties of Sumatran camphor oleoresin across different quality grades. This research aims to provide scientific insight into a high-value endemic NTFP that is currently under sustainability threat, and to support the development of a sustainable local bioindustry within a community-based forest management system in Indonesia.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Oleoresin Hasvesting

Traditionally, local communities in Pakpak Bharat, North Sumatra, use two methods to harvest camphor oleoresin. Although both involve mechanically disrupting the resin duct, there are differences between these techniques, based on the oleoresin yield: oil (balsam) or aqueous-like oleoresin fraction. A 10 cm deep notch is made at the tree base (100-130 cm above ground) to obtain camphor oil. As a result, a slow-flowing balsam fluid (known locally as ombil) will exude from the notch. Whereas aqueous-like oleoresin fraction, namely aqueous camphor, is obtained through a shallower V-shaped incision (3-5 cm deep) made at a height of 100-130 cm above ground, and a horizontal cut at a height of 3-5 m with the same depth, orthogonal to the base incision point (Figure 4). Due to gravity, in a V-shaped tapping, the fluid in tapped resin duct will exude aqueous camphor at a faster flow rate than camphor oil. The harvested trees typically exhibit a minimum diameter of 40 cm.
Based on tapping on each of five sample trees using these two techniques, aqueous camphor and camphor oil were harvested, with the yields, collection time, and physical properties of oleoresin as in Table 1.
Table 1 shows that the diameters of the harvested trees range from 48 to 54 cm. Figure 1 shows that there was no significant correlation between tree diameter and production of aqueous camphor or camphor oil, as the largest diameter tree (Tree 3) had an aqueous camphor yield of 712 ml and an oil yield of 91 ml, while the smallest diameter tree (Tree 5) had a slightly higher oil yield (94 ml). These findings indicate that other factors, such as tissue age, internal pressure, tree health, and secondary metabolic processes in the plant itself, may influence oleoresin production.
Extended collection times did not necessarily correlate with increased yields. Tree 5 recorded the highest flow rate (175.61 ml/min), with an aqueous camphor yield of 720 ml in 4.10 minutes. Conversely, Tree 1, with the longest time (4.52 minutes), exhibits the lowest flow rate (159.85 ml/min). Despite the longer harvest time (248–305 minutes), the flow rate in camphor oil is around 0.315–0.331 ml/min. Tree 5 had an oil yield of up to 94 ml and a flow rate of 0.331 ml/min with a harvest time of 284 minutes, while Tree 1 had the lowest flow rate (0.315 ml/min) with the longest harvest time (305 minutes).
The weak correlation between harvesting time and the yield of both aqueous camphor and oil is also influenced by the saturation point of the compound present in the tapped resin ducts, as well as its viscosity. The average flow rate of aqueous camphor (±170 ml/min) is much higher than that of camphor oil (±0.3 ml/min), as low-viscosity fluids exhibit enhanced flow characteristics through narrow resin duct. Figure 1 illustrates an inverse relationship between viscosity and flow rate, consistent with the principle of fluid dynamics that lower viscosity results in faster flow.
Based on Table 1, Tree 5 exhibited low viscosity and the highest flow rate, indicating that the aqueous camphor was more fluid and higher flow velocity. In comparison, Tree 1 exhibits the highest viscosity (1.713 cP) and the lowest flow rate, which may be attributed to a higher concentration of active components or differences in compound composition. In general, when viscosity is lower, friction against the resin duct walls is reduced, resulting in increased flow speed. Conversely, more viscous oleoresins tend to lower flow velocity. They are more easily retained and accumulated in the resin ducts, which can eventually lead to saturation or blockage, thereby extending the oleoresin collection time e.
Camphor oil shows higher viscosity than aqueous camphor, in accordance with the natural properties of oils that are thicker than aqueous fractions. The highest oil yield (96 ml) with the highest viscosity (6.579 cP) and the lowest flow rate (0.315 ml/minutes) was shown by Tree 1, indicating that camphor oil rich in heavier compounds requires more time. In contrast, Tree 5 yielded slightly less oil compared to Tree 1 but exhibited the lowest viscosity. Consequently, lower viscosity and reduced molecular weight fractions contributed to a higher flow rate (0.331 ml/min), enhancing oleoresin mobility through the resin duct system. These results confirm that higher viscosity is associated with increased flow resistance [23,24]. Viscosity variations suggest distinctions in physical properties attributed to chemical composition or molecular structure. In general, viscosity increases with larger molecular size and weight, as higher weight fractions contribute to greater specific gravity.

2.3. Analysis of Phytochemical Component

This study identified 79 volatile compounds through GC-MS-based chemical profiling on camphor oil samples from five trees (Figure 2). These compounds were grouped into eight major chemical classes, predominantly composed of hydrocarbons, followed by alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, esters, ethers, oxides, and carboxylic acids, respectively. The hydrocarbon compounds were identified as monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and oxygenated hydrocarbons, which contribute significantly to the aroma profile, and exhibit various biological activity, and pharmacological properties.
Table 2 presents the monoterpene identified, including α-pinene, β-pinene, camphene, β-ocimene, myrcene, and d-limonene. The components 1,3,6-Heptatriene and 2,5,5-trimethyl- were highly dominant in the CO2 sample (33.71%), indicating their key role in the compound profile. β-Ocimene was present in high amounts in the CO3, CO4, and CO5 samples, contributing to the aromatic profile and therapeutic properties. Furthermore, sesquiterpene such as caryophyllene were present in high relative abundance in the CO5 sample (36.02%) and were also identified in all samples. Additionally, other hydrocarbon compounds such as humulene, germacrene D, copaene, and muurolene contributed to the aroma and possibly some biological activity.
Based on Table 3, hydrocarbons represent the predominant chemical class in camphor oil, comprising 34 identified constituents, followed by alcohols [15] and ketones [10]. Among the five samples analyzed, CO1 showed the highest chemical diversity (33 compounds), while CO2 had the fewest [21], though it presented a high relative abundance in specific compound categories. Hydrocarbons were predominant across all samples.
The alcohol compounds were predominated by monoterpenols, which have a distinct aromatic profile and exhibit antioxidant, antimicrobial, and neuroactive properties. Terpineol was identified at elevated levels in CO2 (16.55%) and CO3 (10.40%), although it was present in all samples (Table 2). Other alcohols, including menthol, borneol, isoborneol, (−)-pinanediol, and caryophyllenyl alcohol, were also identified. The CO4 and CO5 samples also contained moderate concentrations of caryophyllenyl alcohol, enriching the oxygenated compound profile. Table 3 shows that the alcohol group makes a significant contribution, especially to CO3 (29.28%) and CO2 (23.34%).
Based on Table 2, the ketone group was identified as consisting of eight compounds, including camphor [(+)-2-Bornanone], verbenone, and d-carvone. Among these, camphor compounds were dominant in sample CO1 (5.41% of 12.01% of the total area of the ketone group) and were also present in samples CO2, CO4, and CO5 (Table 3). These ketone compounds contribute to the aromas of mint, camphor, and spices, and exhibit bioactivities such as antimicrobial and respiratory stimulant properties.
Although not the predominant group, oxide compounds constituted a notable fraction of the phytochemical composition of CO1 (23.28%) and CO2 (9.80%) but were not detected in CO3 and CO4. Caryophyllene oxide, a key compound, contributes to herbaceous scent profiles and antifungal and insecticidal properties [25] In addition, aldehydes, such as neral dimethyl acetal and α-campholenal, were detected in low concentrations, with the highest levels identified in CO1 (5.83%).
Ether compounds, such as 1,8-cineole (eucalyptol), were found in CO1 (5.25%) and CO3 (0.06%), while esters like bornyl acetate and fenchyl acetate occurred consistently in all samples, with the highest concentration observed in CO1 (6.19%). Carboxylic acids were primarily detected in CO1 (20.79%), with palmitic acid (14.92%) associated with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities [26,27]. Overall, CO1 displayed a more complex and compositionally balanced chemical profile, whereas CO5 and CO4 were hydrocarbon-rich, indicating a more intense, and aromatic-dominant volatile composition. Despite originating from a relatively homogenous forest stand, inter-sample variability in phytochemical content is likely attributed to differences in secondary metabolism, influenced by genetic variation, the physiological status of individual trees, and site-specific microhabitat conditions [28,29,30].
Phytochemical screening via GC-MS of aqueous camphor oleoresin from five individual trees identified 11 major constituents: camphene, (+)-2-bornanone (camphor), borneol, methyl cinnamate, caryophyllene, trans-cinnamic acid, cyclohexane, 1-ethenyl-1-methyl-2-(1-methyl), caryophyllenyl alcohol, (E)-9-octadecene, onocerin, and 28-norolean-17-en-3-one (see Figure 3).
Table 4 presents the volatile compound profile, which comprises five main groups: hydrocarbons, alcohols, ketones, esters, and carboxylic acids, with varying compositions among samples. These differences reflect the dynamics of secondary metabolism influenced by genetic and microenvironmental factors in each tree.
Cinnamic acid, a carboxylic acid compound, was the predominant constituent in AC1 (85.07%), AC2 (56.51%), and AW3 (59.76%). This aromatic phenolic acid exhibits antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-microbial activities. However, this compound was absent in AC4 and AC5, indicating variations in secondary metabolic production among the tree samples. Borneol, a monoterpenoid alcohol was consistently abundant across all aqueous camphor samples, particularly in AC5 (44.80%) and AC4 (29.52%). This component is characterized by a distinctive camphor-like aroma and is reported to exhibit antibacterial, analgesic, and sedative properties.
Camphene, a hydrocarbon compound, were identified in considerable concentrations in AC4 (13.77%) and AC5 (22.67%), exhibiting fresh olfactory profiles and insect-repellent properties. Furthermore, caryophyllene, a sesquiterpene, was detected in AC2 (11.47%) and AC5 (3.27%), This compound contributes its analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. Other hydrocarbons, such as 9-octadecene (E) and cyclohexane derivatives, were observed in AC4, contributed to the volatile complexity of the samples.
Three main ketones were detected: (+)-2-bornanone (camphor), onocerin, and 28-norolean-17-en-3-one. Camphor concentrations exhibited elevated levels in AC5 (13.67%), acting as an antiseptic and respiratory stimulant. 28-Norolean-17-en-3-one, a triterpenoid compound, was predominant in CW1 (12.53%) but minimal in the other samples, indicating that AC1 possesses distinctive chemical characteristics with strong biological activity.
Methyl cinnamate, an ester of cinnamic acid, showed a marked increase in AC3 (15.38%) and was the highest in AC4 (41.97%). This compound is known to impart a sweet and floral aroma and exhibit antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. Caryophyllenyl alcohol, an alcohol derivative of caryophyllene, was recorded in minor quantities in AC1 to AC3, but was not detected in AC4 and AC5.
Overall, each sample exhibited a distinctive chemical profile, depending on the concentration of key compounds, including trans-cinnamic acid, borneol, methyl cinnamate, and camphene. AC1 presents high potential for pharmaceutical applications, AC4 and AC5 are potentially effective for aromatherapy products or natural cosmetics. In contrast, AC2 and AC3 provide a favourable balance between biological activity and aroma quality.
Table 5 shows the differences between camphor oil and liquid camphor, especially regarding compound composition and solubility based on polarity. Non-polar hydrocarbon compounds dominated camphor oil, particularly in sample CO5 (84.60%), followed by CO2 (62.98%), CO3 (60.29%), and CO4 (58.21%). In contrast, the hydrocarbon content in aqueous camphor was very low or absent, except in AC4 (18.92%) and AC5 (25.94%). Alcohol compounds, which exhibit higher polarity, were identified in high concentrations in both fractions, but were more stable and predominant in aqueous camphor, particularly in AC5 (44.80%). This indicates that alcohol has a prominent contribution to the composition of the aqueous fraction, potentially functioning as a bioactive component with antiseptic or aromatic properties, thereby providing an added advantage to this non-timber forest products.
Other polar compounds, such as ketones, esters, and carboxylic acids, are more abundant in aqueous camphor. Esters reach their highest concentration in AC4 (41.97%). Carboxylic acids, especially trans-cinnamic acid, are the predominant compounds in AC1–AC3 at over 50%. This indicates that carboxylic acids are highly polar and readily dissolve in water. High acid content can affect acidic properties and chemical reactivity. This may provide antiseptic, anti-inflammatory, and preservative activities. In industrial applications, carboxylic acids serve as raw materials for pharmaceuticals, food, and cosmetics [31,32].
Esters influence aroma and potential applications [9,10]. Semi-polar oxides and ethers, stable in oil, appear mainly in camphor oil—CO1 (23.28%) and CO2 (9.80%). Aldehydes are typically found in oil, reflecting their tendency to degrade or oxidize in the presence of water. These compounds contribute to a distinctive aroma and pharmacological activity [33,34].
In general, camphor oil contains non-polar volatile compounds with intense aromatic and bioactive properties, while aqueous camphor is more abundant in polar compounds, such as carboxylic acids, esters, and alcohols, with pharmacological and functional potential. Alcohols, due to their polar characteristic, are more soluble in water and contribute to the aroma profile and antimicrobial activity observed in the aqueous fraction. Serving as solvents and active agents, alcohols enhance the overall functional value of the aqueous camphor. This distinction helps determine how each fraction can be used in flavour, fragrance, cosmetics, medicine, or aromatherapy.
Table 6 shows that camphor oil and aqueous camphor have characteristic plant aromas: herbal/woody (pinene, camphene, thujene, borneol, caryophyllene); citrus/fruity (D-limonene, γ-terpinene, methyl cinnamate); camphor/fresh (eucalyptol, camphor, borneol); and sweet/balsamic (methyl cinnamate, cinnamic acid, bornyl acetate). This aroma profile makes camphor oleoresin suitable for aromatherapy, perfumes, cosmetics, and natural flavourings.
Most compounds in Table 6 exhibit biological activities, particularly anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antifungal, and antioxidant properties. Anti-inflammatory properties are the predominant activity, possessed by almost all the main compounds, including pinene, ocimene, camphene, myrcene, borneol, camphor, D-limonene, terpineol, caryophyllene, cinnamic acid, and bornyl acetate. These compounds, known for their refreshing aromas and analgesic, transdermal absorption effects, are highly relevant for developing topical products (ointments, balms), herbal supplements, or natural pain relief therapies [10,14,16,35,36,38,41,42,50,55,63,67,71,79,80].
In the flavour industry, compounds such as D-Limonene, methyl cinnamate, pinene, and eucalyptol provide citrus, sweet, herbal, fruity, and refreshing aromas [50,75,81,82,83,84,85,86]., enhancing food aroma profile. Terpineol, ocimene, camphor, borneol, eucalyptol, camphene, caryophyllene oxide, methyl cinnamate, cinnamic acid, and ocimene exhibit antimicrobial and antifungal properties [25,38,46,72,75], which can extend the shelf life of food products.
In the cosmetics industry, compounds such as α-thujene, bornyl acetate, and cinnamic acid offer antioxidant, brightening, and antimicrobial benefits. These compounds present potential as natural alternatives to synthetic preservatives in cosmetics and personal care products. Compounds such as camphor, borneol, cinnamyl cinnamate, and caryophyllene oxide provide distinctive, intense aromas—ranging from woody to balsamic—and function as fixatives to extend the longevity of perfumes [14,16,25,87,88]. Terpineol, camphene, limonene, thujene, and humulene exhibit antioxidant properties by scavenge free radicals. These compounds are suitable for anti-aging, skincare, and natural UV protection formulations.
One compound that stands out is cinnamic acid, notable for its applications and therapeutic potential. Specifically, cinnamic acid is an aromatic compound with a mild, sweet, and balsamic aroma profile. It is used in flavourings for its ability to add depth to the sweet-spicy flavours, and in cosmetics as an active agent for skin lightening and UV protection [89]. In medicine, cinnamic acid exhibits various important biological activities, including anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, anticancer, antidiabetic, and antioxidant properties [70,71]. Furthermore, pharmacological studies have demonstrated that cinnamic acid derivatives can inhibit pro-inflammatory enzymes and induce apoptosis in cancer cells, rendering them a potential source for the development of natural compound-based drugs. Other compounds, such as β-caryophyllene, exhibit further therapeutic potential by interacting with CB2 receptors in the endocannabinoid system, opening opportunities for neuroprotective or pain-relieving applications [25,67]. Thus, beyond their pleasant aroma, these biological activities make these aromatic compounds not only additives but also functional components in various consumer products.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Two grades of oleoresin, aqueous and camphor oil, were harvested from each of five sample trees by tapping the trunk to break the resin channels, allowing the oleoresin to exude. The sample Sumatra camphor trees grew naturally in a lowland tropical forest area located in the Sibagindar Village forest (2o30’53”N 98o09’05”E), Pakpak Bharat Regency, North Sumatra Province. This area was the hinterland of the port cities of Barus and Singkil in the past. Currently, this natural forest is the only remaining endemic habitat of the camphor species in Sumatra. The sample trees had a diameter of about 50 cm and a total height of 30-40 meters.

3.1. Methods

3.1.1. Sample Collection

Oleoresin collection is carried out following traditional harvesting practices by local communities in Pakpak Bharat, North Sumatra. First, to obtain the oil fraction, a 10 cm deep notch is made at the base of the tree (100-130 cm above ground or 20 cm above the buttress). As a result, a slow-flowing balsam liquid will exude from the notch. Next, aqueous camphor is obtained through a shallower V-shaped incision (3-5 cm deep) made at a height of 100-130 cm above ground, and a horizontal cut at a height of 3-5 meters of the same depth, orthogonal to the base incision point (Figure 4). All oleoresin is collected, and the time from completion of tapping until the last drop flows is recorded. The viscosity of each sample, both aqueous camphor (5 samples) and camphor oil (5 samples), was measured using a Brookfield DV2T Viscometer.

3.2. Analysis Methods

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used to identify Sumatra oleoresin components (aqueous and oil fraction) in the injected samples. The obtained samples were then identified for their phytochemical compounds using a Shimazu GC-MS-QP2010 Ultra device at the Integrated Laboratory for Bioproducts (i-Lab) BRIN in Cibinong, West Java Indonesia. Since the target compound is an aromatic compound, the column used was Rtx-1 (30m x 0.25mm, thickness 0.25um), with a column temperature of 40-250oC, a temperature rise rate of 4oC/min, a detector temperature of 285oC with a carrier gas of nitrogen at a column rate of 1.78 mL/min and a flow rate of 3.0 mL/min. Identification of phytochemical compounds was carried out by searching the standard spectrum library and the NIST literature. The area of content percentage of each component was calculated using the peak area normalization method.

4. Conclusions

This research identified 79 bioactive compounds in camphor oil and 11 in aqueous camphor. Both have distinct, valuable chemical profiles with broad aromatherapeutic and biological potential. Camphor oil is characterized by non-polar volatile compounds— apart from sample CO1, which exhibits a more balanced compound profile, with notable aroma and bioactivity. In contrast, aqueous camphor emphasizes polar compounds, including carboxylic acids, esters, and alcohols, that offer pharmacological and functional benefits. These findings highlight opportunities for developing natural products in areas such as flavour, fragrance, cosmetics, and medicine, as well as topical applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, A,A., C.R.K., and M.N.I.; validation, formal analysis, and investigation, A.A., C.R.K., M.N.I., M.A.R. and R.Y..; writing—original draft preparation, A.A., C.R.K., M.N.I., M.A.R., Y.S.L., S.W., L.K.P., N.N., R.Y., P.H.S, and D.M.B.; writing—review and editing, A.A., C.R.K., M.N.I., M.A.R., Y.S.L., S.W., L.K.P., N.N., R.Y., P.H.S, and D.M.B.; visualization, A.A.; supervision, A.A.; project administration, A.A. and C.R.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the support of Regents of Pakpak Bharat, Province of North Sumatra, Indonesia. We also gratefully acknowledge the use of BRIN’s e-LSA for conducting the phytochemical analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest

References

  1. Ministry of Environment and Forestry. The State of Indonesia’s Forests 2020. Jakarta; 2021.
  2. Sun, J.; Liu, B.; Rustiami, H.; Xiao, H.; Shen, X.; Ma, K. Mapping Asia Plants: Plant Diversity and a Checklist of Vascular Plants in Indonesia. Plants 2024, 13, 2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nugroho, H.Y.S.H.; Nurfatriani, F.; Indrajaya, Y.; Yuwati, T.W.; Ekawati, S.; Salminah, M.; et al. Mainstreaming Ecosystem Services from Indonesia’s Remaining Forests. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Indrajaya, Y.; Yuwati, T.W.; Lestari, S.; Winarno, B.; Narendra, B.H.; Nugroho, H.Y.S.H.; et al. Tropical Forest Landscape Restoration in Indonesia: A Review. Land (Basel) 2022, 11, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Margono, B.A.; Potapov, P.V.; Turubanova, S.; Stolle, F.; Hansen, M.C. Primary forest cover loss in Indonesia over 2000–2012. Nat Clim Chang 2014, 4, 730–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, B.; Kennedy, C.M.; Xu, B. Effective moratoria on land acquisitions reduce tropical deforestation: evidence from Indonesia. Environmental Research Letters 2019, 14, 044009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Santika, T.; Meijaard, E.; Budiharta, S.; Law, E.A.; Kusworo, A.; Hutabarat, J.A.; et al. Community forest management in Indonesia: Avoided deforestation in the context of anthropogenic and climate complexities. Global Environmental Change 2017, 46:60–71.
  8. Heyne, K. Tumbuhan Berguna Indonesia. Vol. III. Jakarta, Indonesia: Yayasan Sarana Wana Jaya; 1987.
  9. Aswandi, A.; Kholibrina, C.R. New insights into Sumatran camphor (Dryobalanops aromatica Gaertn) management and conservation in western coast Sumatra, Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2021, 739, 012061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aswandi, A.; Kholibrina, C.R. Essential oil and hydrosol production from leaves and resin of Sumatran camphor (Dryobalanops aromatica). In: AIP Conference Proceedings [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 85189243235&doi=10.1063%2f5.0184706&partnerID=40&md5=042218f8065bdd3e3a8f491cc753bc8e.
  11. Axelsson, E.P.; Franco, F.M. Popular Cultural Keystone Species are also understudied — the case of the camphor tree (Dryobalanops aromatica). Trees, Forests and People 2023, 13:100416.
  12. RITONGAFN; DWIYANTIFG; KUSMANAC; SIREGARUJ; SIREGARIZ Population genetics and ecology of Sumatran camphor (Dryobalanops aromatica) in natural and community-owned forests in Indonesia. Biodiversitas 2018, 19, 2175–82. [CrossRef]
  13. Jiang, H.; Wang, J.; Song, L.; Cao, X.; Yao, X.; Tang, F.; et al. GC×GC-TOFMS Analysis of Essential Oils Composition from Leaves, Twigs and Seeds of Cinnamomum camphora L. Presl and Their Insecticidal and Repellent Activities. Molecules 2016, 21, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fazmiya, M.J.A.; Sultana, A.; Rahman, K.; Heyat MBBin Sumbul Akhtar, F.; et al. Current Insights on Bioactive Molecules, Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Other Pharmacological Activities of Cinnamomum camphora Linn. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2022, 2022(1).
  15. Zhang, H.; Huang, T.; Liao, X.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, S.; Chen, J.; et al. Extraction of Camphor Tree Essential Oil by Steam Distillation and Supercritical CO2 Extraction. Molecules 2022, 27, 5385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lee, S.H.; Kim, D.S.; Park, S.H.; Park, H. Phytochemistry and Applications of Cinnamomum camphora Essential Oils. Molecules 2022, 27, 2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Singh, R.; Jawaid, T. Cinnamomum camphora (Kapur): Review. Pharmacognosy Journal 2012, 4, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bhandari, U.; Kumar, A.; Lohani, H.; Chauhan, N. Chemical Composition of Essential Oil of Camphor Tree ( Cinnamomum camphora ) Leaves Grown in Doon Valley of Uttarakhand. Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants 2022, 25, 548–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pasaribu, G.; Winarni, I.; Gusti, R.E.P.; Maharani, R.; Fernandes, A.; Harianja, A.H.; et al. Current Challenges and Prospects of Indonesian Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs): A Review. Forests 2021, 12, 1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abu Bakar Said, Aswandi Anas. Kafur: Bahan Aromatika Alami Asal Indonesia untuk Dunia Islam masa Umayyah dan Abbasiyah (Abad 7 M – 13 M). Solo: Literasinesia; 2023.
  21. Narayanankutty, A.; Famurewa, A.C.; Oprea, E. Natural Bioactive Compounds and Human Health. Molecules 2024, 29, 3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chelliah, R.; Vijayalakshmi, S.; Karuvelan, M.; Barathikannan, K.; Ghimeray, S.; Oh, D.H. Revitalizing natural products for sustainable drug Discovery: Innovations bridging food bioscience and green therapeutic development. Sustain Chem Pharm 2025, 46:102082.
  23. Muhammed, N.S.; Haq, B.; Al Shehri, D.; Al-Ahmed, A.; Rahman, M.M.; Zaman, E. A review on underground hydrogen storage: Insight into geological sites, influencing factors and future outlook. Energy Reports 2022, 8:461–99.
  24. Van Canneyt, K.; Verdonck, P. Mechanics of Biofluids in Living Body. In: Comprehensive Biomedical Physics. Elsevier; 2014. p. 39–53.
  25. Gyrdymova, Y.V.; Rubtsova, S.A. Caryophyllene and caryophyllene oxide: a variety of chemical transformations and biological activities. Chemical Papers 2022, 76, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Prasath, K.G.; Alexpandi, R.; Parasuraman, R.; Pavithra, M.; Ravi, A.V.; Pandian, S.K. Anti-inflammatory potential of myristic acid and palmitic acid synergism against systemic candidiasis in Danio rerio (Zebrafish). Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 2021, 133:111043.
  27. Korbecki, J.; Bajdak-Rusinek, K. The effect of palmitic acid on inflammatory response in macrophages: an overview of molecular mechanisms. Inflammation Research 2019, 68, 915–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Semmar, N. Variational Aspects of Secondary Metabolites. In 2024. p. 3–8.
  29. Jadaun, J.S.; Yadav, R.; Yadav, N.; Bansal, S.; Sangwan, N.S. Influence of Genetics on the Secondary Metabolites of Plants. In: Natural Secondary Metabolites. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 403–33.
  30. Aggarwal, P.R.; Mehanathan, M.; Choudhary, P. Exploring genetics and genomics trends to understand the link between secondary metabolic genes and agronomic traits in cereals under stress. J Plant Physiol 2024, 303:154379.
  31. Samanta, A.; Ojha, K.; Mandal, A. Interactions between Acidic Crude Oil and Alkali and Their Effects on Enhanced Oil Recovery. Energy & Fuels 2011, 25, 1642–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Meredith, W.; Kelland, S.J.; Jones, D.M. Influence of biodegradation on crude oil acidity and carboxylic acid composition. Org Geochem 2000, 31, 1059–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kisiriko, M.; Anastasiadi, M.; Terry, L.A.; Yasri, A.; Beale, M.H.; Ward, J.L. Phenolics from Medicinal and Aromatic Plants: Characterisation and Potential as Biostimulants and Bioprotectants. Molecules 2021, 26, 6343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, Y.; Cai, P.; Cheng, G.; Zhang, Y. A Brief Review of Phenolic Compounds Identified from Plants: Their Extraction, Analysis, and Biological Activity. Nat Prod Commun 2022, 17(1).
  35. Salehi, B.; Upadhyay, S.; Erdogan Orhan, I.; Kumar Jugran, A.; LD Jayaweera S, A. Dias D, et al. Therapeutic Potential of α- and β-Pinene: A Miracle Gift of Nature. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 738. [Google Scholar]
  36. Allenspach, M.; Steuer, C. α-Pinene: A never-ending story. Phytochemistry 2021, 190:112857.
  37. Valente, J.; Zuzarte, M.; Gonçalves, M.J.; Lopes, M.C.; Cavaleiro, C.; Salgueiro, L.; et al. Antifungal, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of Oenanthe crocata L. essential oil. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2013, 62:349–54.
  38. Thakre, A.D.; Mulange, S.V.; Kodgire, S.S.; Zore, G.B.; Karuppayil, S.M. Effects of Cinnamaldehyde, Ocimene, Camphene, Curcumin and Farnesene on <i>Candida albicans</i> Adv Microbiol. 2016;06, 627–43.
  39. Hachlafi, N.E.L.; Aanniz, T.; Menyiy NEl Baaboua AEl Omari NEl Balahbib, A.; et al. In Vitro and in Vivo Biological Investigations of Camphene and Its Mechanism Insights: A Review. Food Reviews International 2023, 39, 1799–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gadotti, V.M.; Huang, S.; Zamponi, G.W. The terpenes camphene and alpha-bisabolol inhibit inflammatory and neuropathic pain via Cav3. 2 T-type calcium channels. Mol Brain 2021, 14, 166. [Google Scholar]
  41. Surendran, S.; Qassadi, F.; Surendran, G.; Lilley, D.; Heinrich, M. Myrcene—What Are the Potential Health Benefits of This Flavouring and Aroma Agent? Front Nutr 2021, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bai, X.; Tang, J. Myrcene Exhibits Antitumor Activity Against Lung Cancer Cells by Inducing Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis Mechanisms. Nat Prod Commun 2020, 15(9).
  43. Kazemi, M. Phytochemical Composition, Antioxidant, Anti-inflammatory and Antimicrobial Activity of Nigella sativa L. Essential Oil. Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants 2014, 17, 1002–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kuete, V. Canarium schweinfurthii. In: Medicinal Spices and Vegetables from Africa. Elsevier; 2017. p. 379–84.
  45. Shiekh RAEl Atwa, A.M.; Elgindy, A.M.; Mustafa, A.M.; Senna, M.M.; Alkabbani, M.A.; et al. Therapeutic applications of eucalyptus essential oils. Inflammopharmacology 2025, 33, 163–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Arooj, B.; Asghar, S.; Saleem, M.; Khalid, S.H.; Asif, M.; Chohan, T.; et al. Anti-inflammatory mechanisms of eucalyptol rich Eucalyptus globulus essential oil alone and in combination with flurbiprofen. Inflammopharmacology 2023, 31, 1849–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Salvatori, E.S.; Morgan, L.V.; Ferrarini, S.; Zilli, G.A.L.; Rosina, A.; Almeida, M.O.P.; et al. Anti-Inflammatory and Antimicrobial Effects of Eucalyptus spp. Essential Oils: A Potential Valuable Use for an Industry Byproduct. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2023, 2023(1).
  48. Ahmad, R.S.; Imran, M.; Ahmad, M.H.; Khan, M.K.; Yasmin, A.; Saima, H.; et al. Eucalyptus essential oils. In: Essential Oils: Extraction, Characterization and Applications [Internet]. 2023. p. 217–39. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85158949163&doi=10.1016%2fB978-0-323-91740-7. 0000. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kardinan, A.; Maris, P.; Darwati, I.; Mustapha, Z.; Ngah, N. Efficacy of Eucalyptus citriodora and Syzygium aromaticum essential oil as insecticidal, antiovipositant, and fumigant against Callosobruchus maculatus F (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Entomological and Acarological Research [Internet]. 2023;55(1). Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85175183725&doi=10.4081%2fjear.2023. 1167. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lin, H.; Li, Z.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Q.; et al. D-Limonene: Promising and Sustainable Natural Bioactive Compound. Applied Sciences 2024, 14, 4605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Anandakumar, P.; Kamaraj, S.; Vanitha, M.K. D-limonene: A multifunctional compound with potent therapeutic effects. J Food Biochem 2021, 45(1).
  52. Masyita, A.; Mustika Sari, R.; Dwi Astuti, A.; Yasir, B.; Rahma Rumata, N.; Emran TBin et, a.l. Terpenes and terpenoids as main bioactive compounds of essential oils, their roles in human health and potential application as natural food preservatives. Food Chem X 2022, 13:100217.
  53. Souza, R.P.; Reis ACdos Pimentel, V.D.; Leal Bde, S.; Freitas MMde Esteves Jda, C.; et al. Toxicogenetic profile and antioxidant evaluation of gamma-terpinene: Molecular docking and in vitro and in vivo assays. Drug Chem Toxicol 2025, 48, 959–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bicas, J.L.; Neri-Numa, I.A.; Ruiz, A.L.T.G.; De Carvalho, J.E.; Pastore, G.M. Evaluation of the antioxidant and antiproliferative potential of bioflavors. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2011, 49, 1610–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sales, A.; Felipe Lde, O.; Bicas, J.L. Production, Properties, and Applications of α-Terpineol. Food Bioproc Tech 2020, 13, 1261–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lin, J.J.; Lin, J.H.; Hsu, S.C.; Weng, S.W.; Huang, Y.P.; Tang, N.Y.; et al. Alpha-phellandrene promotes immune responses in normal mice through enhancing macrophage phagocytosis and natural killer cell activities. In Vivo. 2013;27, 809–14.
  57. Radice, M.; Durofil, A.; Buzzi, R.; Baldini, E.; Martínez, A.P.; Scalvenzi, L.; et al. Alpha-Phellandrene and Alpha-Phellandrene-Rich Essential Oils: A Systematic Review of Biological Activities, Pharmaceutical and Food Applications. Life 2022, 12, 1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang J hong, Sun H long, Chen S yang, Zeng L, Wang T tao. Anti-fungal activity, mechanism studies on α-Phellandrene and Nonanal against Penicillium cyclopium. Bot Stud 2017, 58, 13.
  59. Hu, X.; Yan, Y.; Liu, W.; Liu, J.; Fan, T.; Deng, H.; et al. Advances and perspectives on pharmacological activities and mechanisms of the monoterpene borneol. Phytomedicine 2024, 132:155848.
  60. Bracalini, M.; Tellini Florenzano, G.; Panzavolta, T. Verbenone Differently Affects the Behavior of Saproxylic Beetles: Trials in Pheromone-Baited Bark Beetle Traps. 2024.
  61. Bracalini, M.; Florenzano, G.T.; Panzavolta, T. Verbenone Affects the Behavior of Insect Predators and Other Saproxylic Beetles Differently: Trials Using Pheromone-Baited Bark Beetle Traps. Insects 2024, 15, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yang, H.; Zhao, R.; Chen, H.; Jia, P.; Bao, L.; Tang, H. Bornyl acetate has an anti-inflammatory effect in human chondrocytes via induction of IL-11. IUBMB Life 2014, 66, 854–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhao Z jun, Sun Y long, Ruan X fen. Bornyl acetate: A promising agent in phytomedicine for inflammation and immune modulation. Phytomedicine 2023, 114:154781.
  64. Magnani, R.F.; Volpe, H.X.L.; Luvizotto, R.A.G.; Mulinari, T.A.; Agostini, T.T.; Bastos, J.K.; et al. α-Copaene is a potent repellent against the Asian Citrus Psyllid Diaphorina citri. Sci Rep 2025, 15, 3564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Magnani, R.F.; Volpe, H.X.L.; Luvizotto, R.A.G.; Mulinari, T.A.; Agostini, T.T.; Bastos, J.K.; et al. α-Copaene is a potent repellent against the Asian Citrus Psyllid Diaphorina citri. Sci Rep 2025, 15, 3564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Scandiffio, R.; Geddo, F.; Cottone, E.; Querio, G.; Antoniotti, S.; Gallo, M.P.; et al. Protective Effects of (E)-β-Caryophyllene (BCP) in Chronic Inflammation. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Francomano, F.; Caruso, A.; Barbarossa, A.; Fazio, A.; La Torre, C.; Ceramella, J.; et al. β-Caryophyllene: A Sesquiterpene with Countless Biological Properties. Applied Sciences 2019, 9, 5420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mendes de Lacerda Leite, G.; de Oliveira Barbosa, M.; Pereira Lopes, M.J.; de Araújo Delmondes, G.; Bezerra, D.S.; Araújo, I.M.; et al. Pharmacological and toxicological activities of α-humulene and its isomers: A systematic review. Trends Food Sci Technol 2021, 115:255–74.
  69. Dalavaye, N.; Nicholas, M.; Pillai, M.; Erridge, S.; Sodergren, M.H. The Clinical Translation of α-humulene – A Scoping Review. Planta Med 2024, 90, 664–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ruwizhi, N.; Aderibigbe, B.A. Cinnamic Acid Derivatives and Their Biological Efficacy. Int J Mol Sci 2020, 21, 5712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Freitas, M.; Ribeiro, D.; Janela, J.S.; Varela, C.L.; Costa, S.C.; da Silva, E.T.; et al. Plant-derived and dietary phenolic cinnamic acid derivatives: Anti-inflammatory properties. Food Chem 2024, 459:140080.
  72. Ruwizhi, N.; Aderibigbe, B.A. Cinnamic Acid Derivatives and Their Biological Efficacy. Int J Mol Sci 2020, 21, 5712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bhatia, S.P.; Letizia, C.S.; Api, A.M. Fragrance material review on β-caryophyllene alcohol. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2008, 46, S95–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Fidyt, K.; Fiedorowicz, A.; Strządała, L.; Szumny, A. β -caryophyllene and β -caryophyllene oxide—natural compounds of anticancer and analgesic properties. Cancer Med 2016, 5, 3007–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Huang, Q.S.; Zhu, Y.J.; Li, H.L.; Zhuang, J.X.; Zhang, C.L.; Zhou, J.J.; et al. Inhibitory Effects of Methyl trans -Cinnamate on Mushroom Tyrosinase and Its Antimicrobial Activities. J Agric Food Chem 2009, 57, 2565–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Purushothaman, R.; Vishnuram, G.; Ramanathan, T. Antiinflammatory efficacy of n-Hexadecanoic acid from a mangrove plant Excoecaria agallocha L. through in silico, in vitro and in vivo. Pharmacological Research - Natural Products 2025, 7:100203.
  77. Aparna, V.; Dileep, K.V.; Mandal, P.K.; Karthe, P.; Sadasivan, C.; Haridas, M. Anti-Inflammatory Property of n -Hexadecanoic Acid: Structural Evidence and Kinetic Assessment. Chem Biol Drug Des 2012, 80, 434–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Aparna, V.; Dileep, K.V.; Mandal, P.K.; Karthe, P.; Sadasivan, C.; Haridas, M. Anti-Inflammatory Property of n -Hexadecanoic Acid: Structural Evidence and Kinetic Assessment. Chem Biol Drug Des 2012, 80, 434–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pastorova, I.; de Koster, C.G.; Boon, J.J. Analytical Study of Free and Ester Bound Benzoic and Cinnamic Acids of Gum Benzoin Resins by GC-MS and HPLC-frit FAB-MS. Phytochemical Analysis 1997, 8, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chung, K.S.; Hong, J.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, H.J.; Park, J.Y.; Choi, J.H.; et al. β-Caryophyllene in the Essential Oil from Chrysanthemum Boreale Induces G1 Phase Cell Cycle Arrest in Human Lung Cancer Cells. Molecules 2019, 24, 3754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, J.; An, W.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Han, B.; Tao, H.; et al. Vanillin Has Potent Antibacterial, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities In Vitro and in Mouse Colitis Induced by Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kafali, M.; Finos, M.A.; Tsoupras, A. Vanillin and Its Derivatives: A Critical Review of Their Anti-Inflammatory, Anti-Infective, Wound-Healing, Neuroprotective, and Anti-Cancer Health-Promoting Benefits. Nutraceuticals 2024, 4, 522–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zari, A.T.; Zari, T.A.; Hakeem, K.R. Anticancer properties of eugenol: A review. Molecules [Internet]. 2021;26(23). Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85121119547&doi=10. 3390. [Google Scholar]
  84. Ulanowska, M.; Olas, B. Biological Properties and Prospects for the Application of Eugenol—A Review. Int J Mol Sci 2021, 22, 3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Nisar, M.F.; Khadim, M.; Rafiq, M.; Chen, J.; Yang, Y.; Wan, C.C. Pharmacological Properties and Health Benefits of Eugenol: A Comprehensive Review. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2021, 2021(1).
  86. Daniel, A.N.; Sartoretto, S.M.; Schmidt, G.; Caparroz-Assef, S.M.; Bersani-Amado, C.A.; Cuman, R.K.N. Anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activities of eugenol essential oil in experimental animal models. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia [Internet]. 2009;19(1 B):212–7. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-69949085117&doi=10. 1590. [Google Scholar]
  87. Kholibrina, C.R.; Aswandi, A. The Consumer Preferences for New Sumatran Camphor Essential Oil-based Products using a Conjoint Analysis Approach. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85104173132&doi=10.1088%2f1755-1315%2f715%2f1%2f012078&partnerID=40&md5=e80b926df0942f65655fd4f797329f1c.
  88. Bhatia, S.P.; Wellington, G.A.; Cocchiara, J.; Lalko, J.; Letizia, C.S.; Api, A.M. Fragrance material review on cinnamyl cinnamate. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2007, 45, S66–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Gunia-Krzyżak, A.; Słoczyńska, K.; Popiół, J.; Koczurkiewicz, P.; Marona, H.; Pękala, E. Cinnamic acid derivatives in cosmetics: current use and future prospects. Int J Cosmet Sci 2018, 40, 356–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Relationship between tree diameter, viscosity and flow rate.
Figure 1. Relationship between tree diameter, viscosity and flow rate.
Preprints 176813 g001
Figure 2. GC-MS of Sumatra camphor oil.
Figure 2. GC-MS of Sumatra camphor oil.
Preprints 176813 g002
Figure 3. GC-MS of aqueous camphor.
Figure 3. GC-MS of aqueous camphor.
Preprints 176813 g003
Figure 4. Oleoresin tapping of Sumatra camphor oleoresin.
Figure 4. Oleoresin tapping of Sumatra camphor oleoresin.
Preprints 176813 g004
Table 1. Sumatra camphor oleoresin production.
Table 1. Sumatra camphor oleoresin production.
Sample Diameter
(cm)
Aqueous camphor Camphor oil
Time (minutes) Yield
(ml)
Flow rate (ml/min) Viscocity
(cP)
Time (minutes) Yield
(ml)
Flow rate (ml/min) Viscocity
(cP)
Tree 1 52 4.52 722 159.85 1.713 305 96 0.315 6.579
Tree 2 48 3.90 678 173.85 1.648 264 87 0.330 5.325
Tree 3 54 4.15 712 171.57 1.675 286 91 0.318 5.914
Tree 4 50 3.78 664 175.51 1.613 248 81 0.327 4.072
Tree 5 48 4.10 720 175.61 1.549 284 94 0.331 3.225
Time is measured starting from the trunk tapping is completed until the final drop of oleoresin is gathered.
Table 2. Phytochemical content of Sumatra camphor oil.
Table 2. Phytochemical content of Sumatra camphor oil.
No RTime Component Group Area content (%)
CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5
1 7.015 α-Pinene Hydrocarbon 2.52 - - - -
2 7.186 1,3,6-Heptatriene, 2,5,5-trimethyl- Hydrocarbon - 33.71 1.28 3.19 3.74
3 7.325 β-Ocimene Hydrocarbon - - 11.76 7.82 10.46
4 7.385 1,4-Cyclohexadiene, 3,3,6,6-tetramethyl Hydrocarbon - - - - 5.78
5 7.390 8-Methylenebicyclo [4.2.0]oct-2-ene Hydrocarbon - - - 5.26 -
6 7.520 6-Propenylbicyclo [3.1.0]hexan-2-one Ketone - - 4.04 - -
7 7.537 Camphene Hydrocarbon - 1.92 1.59 2.89 1.31
8 8.309 β-Pinene Hydrocarbon - 3.41 - 1.49 -
9 8.493 Bicyclo [2.2.1]heptane, 2,2-dimethyl-3-methyl Hydrocarbon - - 4.54 - 5.53
10 8.504 Cyclohexane, 1-isopropyl-1-methyl- Hydrocarbon - - - 0.31 -
11 8.643 Cyclohexane, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-, cis Hydrocarbon - - 1.32 - -
12 8.759 Bicyclo [4.1.0]heptane, 3,7,7-trimethyl- Hydrocarbon - - 0.49 - -
13 8.893 β-Myrcene Hydrocarbon - - 0.14 - 0.13
14 9.174 4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 2,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahy Hydrocarbon - 0.16 - - -
15 9.236 α-Thujene Hydrocarbon - - 0.68 0.64 0.68
16 9.515 Eucalyptol Ether 0.99 - 0.06 0.54 -
17 9.646 2-Carene Hydrocarbon - - - - 0.58
18 9.718 Cymene Hydrocarbon 1.08 1.08 - 0.80 0.48
19 10.036 D-Limonene Hydrocarbon - 4.43 - - 1.00
20 10.135 para-Menthadiene Hydrocarbon - - - - 4.88
21 10.162 1,5-Cyclodecadiene, (E,Z)- hydrocarbon - - 11.80 4.35 -
22 10.330 trans-β-Ocimene Hydrocarbon - 0.07 - - -
23 11.008 γ-Terpinene Hydrocarbon - - 0.64 0.55 0.46
24 11.298 Terpineol Alcohol 7.70 16.55 10.40 7.13 3.65
25 11.567 D-Fenchone Ketone 0.18 - 0.13 - 0.09
26 11.793 p-(1-Propenyl)-toluene Hydrocarbon 0.43 0.11 - - -
27 12.062 α-Phellandrene Hydrocarbon - - 1.35 1.36 -
28 12.667 Neral dimethyl acetal Aldehyde 3.97 0.88 - - -
29 12.831 α-Campholenal Aldehyde - 0.24 - - -
30 13.394 (+)-2-Bornanone (camphor) Ketone 5.41 1.00 - 1.26 1.31
31 13.570 Menthol Alcohol - - 2.46 - -
32 13.710 Linalool Alcohol - 0.14 - - -
33 13.756 Octanal, 7-hydroxy-3,7-dimethyl- Aldehyde - - - - 0.42
34 13.798 Borneol Alcohol - 6.39 - 0.82 3.41
35 13.836 Cyclohexanemethanol, α, α.,4-trimet Alcohol - - 2.35 - -
36 13.940 7-Octen-2-ol, 2,6-dimethyl- Alcohol 0.78 - - - -
37 14.805 Fenchyl acetate Ester 0.60 - - - -
38 15.055 Bicyclo [3.1.1]hept-2-ene-2-carboxaldehyde, 6 Aldehyde 1.86 - - - -
39 15.138 Bicyclo [3.1.0]hexan-3-ol, 4-methyl-1-(1-meth Alcohol - - 12.84 - -
40 15.647 Verbenone Ketone 3.70 - - - -
41 16.688 D-Carvone Ketone 0.75 - - - -
42 17.325 (−)-Pinanediol Alcohol 0.83 0.10 - - -
43 18.508 Bornyl acetate Ester 4.01 1.47 0.12 0.53 0.13
44 18.590 Carvenone Ketone 0.28 - - - -
45 18.868 Isoborneol Alcohol 0.49 - - - -
46 21.478 Isobornyl propionate Ester 0.42 - - - -
47 22.026 Copaene Hydrocarbon - - - 4.11 -
48 23.300 Caryophyllene Hydrocarbon 1.29 13.64 18.11 17.30 36.02
49 23.329 2-Heptanone, 7,7-dimethoxy-5-(1-methylethy Ketone 0.39 - - - -
50 24.194 Humulene Hydrocarbon - 4.45 6.59 - 11.96
51 24.297 Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 1,7,7-trimethylbicy Carboxylic acid 0.68 - 0.13 - -
52 24.531 Cyclohexene, 4-[(1E)-1,5-dimethyl-1,4-hexad Hydrocarbon - - - 6.70 -
53 24.932 (3R,4aS,5R)-4a,5-Dimethyl-3-(prop-1-en-2-yl Hydrocarbon - - - 0.25 -
54 25.163 Germacrene D Hydrocarbon - - - - 0.69
55 25.532 Bicyclo [5.2.0]nonane, 2-methylene-4,8,8- trimethylnonane bicyclic Hydrocarbon - - - - 0.26
56 25.589 Muurolene Hydrocarbon - - - 0.19 0.16
57 25.920 1H-Cycloprop[e]azulene, decahydro-1,1,7-tri Hydrocarbon - - - 0.12 -
58 26.277 1-Isopropyl-4,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,5,6,8a-hexahy Hydrocarbon - - - 0.88 0.48
59 26.700 2,5,9-Trimethylcycloundeca-4,8-dienone Ketone 0.44 - - - -
60 27.035 2-Naphthalenemethanol, 1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-oct Alcohol - - - 0.21 0.15
61 27.326 Bornyl isovalerate Ester - - 0.23 - -
62 27.553 Caryophyllenyl alcohol Alcohol - - 1.23 3.30 2.65
63 27.835 Caryophyllene oxide Oxide 21.27 8.45 - - 0.30
64 28.331 3,7-Cycloundecadien-1-ol, 1,5,5,8-tetramethyl- Alcohol - - - 0.34 -
65 28.361 Terpene oxide Oxide - 1.35 - - -
66 28.364 Ledol Alcohol - - - - 0.62
67 28.428 (1R,3E,7E,11R)-1,5,5,8-Tetramethyl-12-oxab Ether 4.26 - - - -
68 28.900 Bicyclo [3.1.0]hexane-6-methanol, 2-hydroxy- Alcohol - 0.16 - - -
69 28.900 2(1H)-Naphthalenone, octahydro-1,1,4a-trime Ketone - - 0.28 - -
70 29.970 11-Hexadecyn-1-ol Alcohol 1.49 - - - -
71 31.247 7-Oxabicyclo [4.1.0]heptane, 1-methyl-4-(2-m Oxide 2.01 - - - -
72 32.135 (1R,2S,4S,5R,7R)-5-isopropyl-1-methyl-3,8-d Hydrocarbon 0.40 - - - -
73 33.220 9-Undecenal, 2,10-dimethyl- Aldehyde - - 0.14 - -
74 34.713 3-Carene, 2-acetyl- Ketone 0.86 - - - -
75 36.841 Methyl palmitate Ester 0.56 - - - -
76 38.440 n-Hexadecanoic acid Carboxylic acid 14.92 - - - -
77 40.383 Eicosanoic acid Carboxylic acid 1.14 - - - -
78 41.680 Methyl stearate Ester 0.60 - - - -
79 42.733 Octadecanoic acid Carboxylic acid 4.05 - - - -
Table 3. Summary of phytochemical content of camphor oil.
Table 3. Summary of phytochemical content of camphor oil.
Group Number of Component Sample CO1 Sample CO2 Sample CO3 Sample CO4 Sample CO5
n % n % n % n % n %
Hydrocarbon 34 5 5.72 10 62.98 13 60.29 18 58.21 18 84.60
Alcohol 15 5 11.29 5 23.34 5 29.28 5 11.8 5 10.48
Aldehyde 5 2 5.83 2 1.12 1 0.14 - 1 0.42
Ketone 10 8 12.01 1 1.00 3 4.45 1 1.26 2 1.40
Ether 2 2 5.25 - 1 0.06 1 0.54 - -
Oxide 3 2 23.28 2 9.80 - - - 1 0.30
Ester 6 5 6.19 1 1.47 2 0.35 1 0.53 1 0.13
Carboxylic acid 4 4 20.79 - 1 0.13 - - - -
Grand Total 79 33 21 26 26 28
Table 4. The chemical composition and area content of aqueous camphor.
Table 4. The chemical composition and area content of aqueous camphor.
No R. Time Component Group Area content (%)
AC1 AC2 AC3 AC4 AC5
1 7.451 Camphene Hydrocarbon - 1.77 - 13.77 22.67
2 13.284 (+)-2-Bornanone (Camphor) Ketone 1.13 3.58 2.61 5.40 13.67
3 14.835 Borneol Alcohol 11.18 21.87 18.52 29.52 44.80
4 21.119 Methyl cinnamate Ester 1.99 1.80 15.38 41.97 -
5 23.034 Caryophyllene Hydrocarbon - 11.47 - - 3.27
6 23.059 trans-Cinnamic acid Carboxylic acid 85.07 56.51 59.76 - -
7 24.057 Cyclohexane, 1-ethenyl-1-methyl-2-(1-methyl Hydrocarbon - - - 3.58 -
8 27.335 Caryophyllenyl alcohol Alcohol 0.63 1.43 1.91 - -
9 28.567 9-Octadecene, (E)- Hydrocarbon - - - 1.57 -
10 60.604 Onocerin Ketone 3.07 - - - -
11 61.499 28-Norolean-17-en-3-one Ketone 12.53 1.58 1.83 4.19 -
Table 5. Summary of the phytochemical component group and area content.
Table 5. Summary of the phytochemical component group and area content.
Group Area content (%)
Camphor oil Aqueous camphor
CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5 AC1 AC2 AC3 AC4 AC5
Hydrocarbon 5.72 62.98 60.29 58.21 84.60 - 13.24 - 18.92 25.94
Alcohol 11.29 23.34 29.28 11.8 10.48 11.81 23.30 20.43 29.52 44.80
Aldehyde 5.83 1.12 0.14 - 0.42 - - - - -
Ketone 12.01 1.00 4.45 1.26 1.40 1.13 5.16 4.44 9.59 29.27
Ether 5.25 - 0.06 0.54 - - - - - -
Oxide 23.28 9.80 - - 0.30 - - - - -
Ester 6.19 1.47 0.35 0.53 0.13 1.99 1.80 15.38 41.97 -
Carboxylic acid 20.79 - 0.13 - - 85.07 56.51 59.76 - -
Table 6. Aromatic and bioactivity profiles of some of major phytochemical compounds in camphor oleoresin.
Table 6. Aromatic and bioactivity profiles of some of major phytochemical compounds in camphor oleoresin.
Compound Aroma Profile Bioactivity Application
Flavour Fragrance Cosmetic Medicine
Pinene Piney, resinous, herbal Anti-inflammatory, bronchodilator, AChE inhibitor, GABA modulator, antimicrobial (solvent, biofuel)[35,36]
β-Ocimene Sweet, fruity, herbaceous, floral Antifungal, anti-inflammatory, plant defense [37,38]
Camphene Herbal, woody, fir, camphor Antibacterial, antifungal, anticancer, antioxidant, antiparasitic, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, anti-leishmanial, hepatoprotective, antiviral, anti-acetylcholinesterase inhibitory and hypolipidemic activities [38,39,40] -
β-Myrcene Fruity, herbal, musky, earthy Anti-inflammatory, analgesic, sedative, anti-cancer, antitumor [41,42]. - - -
α-Thujene woody, herbal, spicy Antioxidant, antimalarial, antibacterial, antimicrobial [43,44] -
Eucalyptol fresh, camphor, spicy Anti-inflammatory, expectorant, antimicrobial, antiseptic, insecticidal [45,46,47,48,49]
D-Limonene citrusy, sweet Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antibacterial, and natural solvent of topical drugs [50,51]
γ-Terpinene Herbal, citrus, spicy, fresh Antimicrobial, antiparasitic, anticancer, antinociceptive, antiplatelet, natural preservative [52,53] - -
Terpineol Floral, fresh, pine, citrusy Antioxidant, antiproliferative [54,55]
α-Phellandrene Peppery, herbal, citrusy, minty Antifungal, immunostimulant [56,57,58] -
Borneol Soft, woody, balsamic camphor. anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antibacterial, antiviral, relieves pain and fever, repellent [59]
(+)-2-Bornanone (camphor) Sharp, refreshing, minty camphor anti-inflammatory, antiseptic, topical analgesic, rubefacient - improves blood circulation [14,16,17] -
Verbenone verbena, rosemary-like Beetle pheromone/inhibitor, anti-microbial [60,61] - -
Bornyl acetate Balsamic, resin-like, sweet Anti-inflammatory, immune modulator [62,63]. -
Copaene Balsamic, woody, peppery, herbal Insect-repellent, attracts/repels certain pests [64,65]. - -
β-Caryophyllene Woody, spicy, dry anti-inflammatory, anticancer, analgesic, interaction with CB2 (cannabinoid) receptors, [66,67] -
Humulene earthy, woody, slightly spicy anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antibacterial, [68,69] - - -
Cinnamic acid Sweet, balsamic, cinnamon-like anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antibacterial, antidiabetic, sunscreen and skin lightening product [70,71,72] -
Caryophyllenyl alcohol Woody, slightly floral anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, sedative effects [73] - -
Caryophyllene oxide Woody, spicy, fresh antioxidant, anticancer, antifungal [25,74] - -
Methyl cinnamate Sweet, fruity, like strawberries anti-inflammatory, antifungal, antimicrobial [75] -
n-Hexadecanoic acid Waxy, faint (olive oil-like) anti-inflammatory, prostaglandin E2 9 reductase inhibitor [76,77,78] - - -
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated