Submitted:
12 September 2025
Posted:
16 September 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental design and treatments
2.2. Performance
2.3. Biochemical variables related to oxidative stress
2.4. Physical-chemical analysis of the meat
2.5. Statistical analysis
3. Results
3.1. Fertility, hatching and biochemical parameters
3.2. Performance
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| BA | Breeder age |
| IT | Incubator type |
| TBARS | Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances |
| SS | Single-stage |
| MS | Multi-stage |
| ROS | Reactive oxygen species |
| TP | Protein thiols |
| NOX | NADP Oxidase |
References
- FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Gateway to poultry production and products. Available at http://www.fao.
- ABPA (Associação Brasileira de Proteína Animal) Annual Report, 2023. Available at https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=abpa+relat%C3%B3rio+anual+2023.
- Muerer, R.F.P.; Valle, F.L.P.; Santos, A.S.; Zanatta, C.P.; Dahlke, F.; Maiorka, A.; Oliveira, E. G. Interaction of breeder age and egg weight on performance of broilers. Arch. Vet. Science, 2008, 13, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emamverdi, M.; Zare-Shahneh, A.; Zhandi, M.; Zaghari, M.; Minai-Tehrani, D.; Khodaei-Motlagh, M. An improvement in productive and reproductive performance of aged broiler breeder hens by dietary supplementation of organic selenium. Theriogenology, 2019, 126, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uyanga, V.A.; Onagbesan, O.M.; Oke, O.E.; Abiona, J.A.; Egbeyale, L.T. Influence of age of broiler breeders and storage duration on egg quality and blastoderm of Marshall broiler breeders. J.Ap. Poultry Research, 2020, 29, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lourens, A.; Van Den Brand, H.; Heetkamp, M.J.W.; Meijerhof, R.; Kemp, B. Effect of egg size on heat production and the transition of energy from egg to hatchling. Poult. Science, 2006, 85, 770–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baracho, M.S.; Naas, I.A.; Gigli, A.C.S. Impacto das variáveis ambientais em incubatório de estágio múltiplo de frangos de corte. Eng. Agrícola, 2010, 30, 563–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molenaar, R.I.; Reijrink, I.A.M.I.; Meijerhof, R.I.I.; Van den Brand, H. Meeting embryonic requirements of broilers throughout hatching: A review. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 2010, 12, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yassin, H.; Velthuis, A.G.J.; Boerjan, M.; Van Riel, J.; Huirne, R.B.M. Field study on broiler eggs hatchability. Poultry Science, 2008, 87, 2408–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulmer-Franco, A.M.; Fasenko, G.M.; Christopher, E.E.O.D. Hatching egg characteristics, chick quality, and broiler performance at 2 breeder flock ages and from 3 egg weights. Poultry Science, 2010, 89, 2735–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rostagno, H.S.; Albino, L.F.T.; Donzele, J.L.; Oliveira, R.F.; Lopes, D.C.; Ferreira, A.S.; Barreto, S.L.T. Tabelas Brasileiras para Aves e Suínos. 2. ed. Viçosa, Brasil, 2011.
- Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. 3. ed. [s.l.] Oxford University Press, v. 1, 2015.
- Hoyland, D.V.; Taylor, A.J. A review of the methodology of the 2-Thiobarbituric Acid Test. Food Chem., 1990, 40, 271–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellman, G.L. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 1959, 82, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miranda, K.M.; Espey, M.G.; Wink, D.A.A. A rapid, simple spectrophotometric method for simultaneous detection of nitrate and nitrite. Nitric oxide : biology and chemistry, 2001, 5, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamm, R. Biochemistry Of Meat Hydration. Advances in Food Research, 1961, 10, 355–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Honikel, K.O. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Science, 1998, 49, 447–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyon, C.E.; Lyon, B.G.; Dickens, J. A. Effects of carcass stimulation, deboning time, and marination on color and texture of broiler breast meat. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 1998, 7, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jabbar, A.; Ditta, Y.A. Effect of Broiler Breeders Age on Hatchability, Candling, Water Loss, Chick Yield and Dead in Shell. World Veterinary Journal 2017, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peebles, E.D.; Doyle, S.M.; Zumwalt, C.D.; Gerard, P.D.; Latour, M.A.; Boyle, C.R.; Smith, T.W. Breeder age influences embryogenesis in broiler hatching eggs. Poultry Science, 2001, 80, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, C.; Reeves, R. ‘High Value Opportunities from the Chicken Egg: A Report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation’ 1st ed. RIRDC: AUSTRALIA, 2002.
- Lara, L.J.C.; Baião, N.C.; Cançado, S.V.; Teixeira, J.L.; López, C.A.; Duarte, F.D.; Michalsky, V.B. Effect of chick weight on performance and carcass yield of broilers. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia, 2005, 57, 799–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rocha, J.S.R.; Lara, L.J.C.; Baião, N.C.; Cançado, M.V.; Triginelli, S.V.; Leite, J.F.C. Effect of egg classification prior to setting on broiler chicken uniformity, performance and meat yields. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia, 2008, 60, 1181–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsobayel, A.A.; Almarshade, M.A.; Albadry, M.A. Effect of breed, age and storage period on egg weight, egg weight loss and chick weight of commercial broiler breeders raised in Saudi Arabia. J.of the Saudi Society of Ag. Sciences, 2013, 12, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grochowska, E.; Kinal, A.; Sobek, Z.; Siatkowski, I.; Bednarczyk, M. Field study on the factors affecting egg weight loss, early embryonic mortality, hatchability, and chick mortality with the use of classification tree technique. Poult. Science, 2019, 98, 3626–3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mesquita, M.A.; Araújo, I.C.S.; Café, M.B.; Arnhold, E.; Mascarenhas, A.G.; Carvalho, F.B.; Stringhini, J.H.; Leandro, N.S.M.; Gonzales, E. Results of hatching and rearing broiler chickens in different hatching systems. Poult. Science, 2021, 100, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araújo, I.C.S.; Leandro, N.S.M.; Mesquina, M.A.; Café, M.B.; Gonzales, E. Effect of incubator type and broiler breeder age on hatchability and chick quality. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 2016, 18, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lourens, A.; Van Den Brand, H.; Heetkamp, M.J.W.; Meijerhof, R.; Kemp, B. Effects of eggshell temperature and oxygen concentration on embryo growth and metabolism during incubation. Poultry Science, 2007, 86, 2194–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belhadj Slimen, I.; Najar, T.; Ghram, A.; Abdrrabba, M. Heat stress effects on livestock: Molecular, cellular and metabolic aspects, a review. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2016, 100, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nawab, A.; Li, G.; Na, L.; Wu, J.; Chao, L.; Xiao, M.; Zhao, Y.; Birmani, M.W.; Ghani, M.W. Effect of curcumin supplementation on TLR4 mediated non-specific immune responses in liver of laying hens under high-temperature conditions. Journal of Thermal Biology, 2019, 84, 384–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Bazhin, A.V.; Werner, J.; Karakhanova, S. Reactive oxygen species in the immune system. International Reviews of Immunology, 2013, 32, 249–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Damaziak, K.; Paweska, M.; Gozdowski, D.; Niemiec, J. Short periods of hatching, egg turning during storage and broiler breeder hens age for early development of embryos, hatching results, chicks quality and juvenile growth. P. Science, 2018, 97, 3264–3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machado, J.P.; Mesquita, M.A.; Café, M.B.; Assis, S.D.; Veríssimo, S.; Santos, R.R.; Leandro, N.S.M.; Araújo, I.C.S. Effects of breeder age on embryonic development, hatching results, chick quality, and growing performance of the slow-growing genotype. P. Science, 2020, 99, 6697–6704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meijerhof, R. The effect of litter material on productivity and health of broiler chickens. Australian Poultry, 2009, 107–116.
- Karaoglu, M.; Aksu, M.I.; Esenbuga, N.; Kaya, A.; Macit, M. Carcass and commercial cuts yield in broilers of different ages fed diets supplemented with probiotics. African Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2014, 5, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaboli, G. Huang, X.; Feng, X.; Ahn, D.U. How can heat stress affect chicken meat quality? - A review. Poult. Science, 2019, 98, 1551–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
Breeder Age (Week - BA) |
Incubator Type (IT) |
P BA x IT |
CV (%) |
||||||
| 35 | 61 | P | SS | MS | P | ||||
| IE | 1.19 | 13.02 | * | 7.86 | 6.32 | 0.249 | 0.115 | 52.87 | |
| HAT | 93.75 | 79.34 | ** | 85.22 | 87.87 | 0.080 | 0.079 | 4.74 | |
| HFE | 94.85 | 90.73 | ** | 91.85 | 93.73 | 0.078 | 0.198 | 3.13 | |
| M4 | 2.63 | 5.30 | ** | 4.92 | 3.02 | ** | ** | 39.44 | |
| M5-18 | 0.67 | 1.69 | 0.014 | 1.71 | 0.65 | 0.010 | 0.960 | 49.40 | |
| M19-21 | 1.10 | 3.17 | 0.014 | 2.11 | 2.17 | 0.92 | 0.343 | 56.66 | |
| TEM. | 5.14 | 9.26 | ** | 8.14 | 6.26 | 0.078 | 0.197 | 40.37 | |
| HWL | 12.09 | 13.57 | ** | 11.96 | 13.70 | ** | 0.158 | 2.97 | |
| Breeder Age (Weeks) | |||
| Incubator | 35 | 61 | |
| Single Stage | 2.24 | 7.60 | P<0.001 |
| Multi-stage | 3.03 | 3.02 | P = 1.00 |
| P = 0.740 | P<0.001 | ||
|
Breeder Age (Week - BA) |
Incubator Type (IT) |
P BA x IT |
CV (%) |
||||||
| 35 | 61 | P | SS | MS | P | ||||
| ROS | 18117 | 14611 | 0.122 | 17560 | 15168 | 0.286 | 0.077 | 37.14 | |
| TBARS | 51.25 | 41.86 | 0.091 | 47.51 | 45.60 | 0.724 | 0.148 | 31.71 | |
| TP | 0.054 | 0.053 | 0.808 | 0.049 | 0.058 | 0.042 | 0.034 | 22.23 | |
| NOX | 7.23 | 6.81 | 0.541 | 6.20 | 7.85 | 0.022 | 0.197 | 27.43 | |
| Breeder Age (Weeks) | |||
| Incubator | 35 | 61 | |
| Single Stage | 0.055 | 0.044 | P= 0.33 |
| Multi-stage | 0.054 | 0.062 | P= 0.49 |
| P= 0.99 | P=0.030 | ||
|
Breeder Age (Week - BA) |
Incubator Type (IT) |
P BA x IT |
CV (%) | ||||||
| 35 | 61 | P | SS | MS | P | ||||
| 1 to 7 d. | |||||||||
| IW | 0.042 | 0.050 | * | 0.046 | 0.046 | 0.941 | 0.161 | 1.95 | |
| FI | 0.167 | 0.178 | 0.056 | 0.181 | 0.169 | ** | 0.423 | 8.65 | |
| WG | 0.143 | 0.156 | * | 0.155 | 0.143 | * | 0.703 | 5.52 | |
| FC | 1.17 | 1.14 | 0.14 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 0.141 | 0.231 | 7.14 | |
| FV | 100 | 100 | --- | 100 | 100 | --- | --- | --- | |
| 1 to 21 d. | |||||||||
| FI | 1.222 | 1.300 | ** | 1.469 | 1.177 | 0.587 | 0.417 | 4.14 | |
| WG | 0.978 | 1.057 | * | 0.985 | 0.957 | 0.077 | 0.181 | 3.80 | |
| FC | 1.250 | 1.230 | 0.124 | 1.240 | 1.230 | 0.75 | 0. 311 | 2.74 | |
| FV | 98.33 | 97.77 | 0.672 | 98.88 | 97.22 | 0.211 | 0.671 | 3.22 | |
| 1 to 35 d. | |||||||||
| FI | 3.560 | 3.734 | ** | 3.645 | 3.649 | 0.979 | 0.384 | 3.77 | |
| WG | 2.552 | 2.704 | ** | 2.624 | 2.631 | 0.869 | 0.236 | 4.03 | |
| FC | 1.395 | 1.381 | 0.291 | 1.389 | 1.387 | 0.863 | 0.477 | 2.07 | |
| FV | 96.66 | 97.22 | 0.764 | 97.22 | 96.66 | 0.761 | 0.140 | 4.57 | |
| 1 to 42 d. | |||||||||
| FI | 5.029 | 5.237 | ** | 5.141 | 5.121 | 0.721 | 0.857 | 3.83 | |
| WG | 3.311 | 3.464 | ** | 3.414 | 3.360 | 0.329 | 0.863 | 3.94 | |
| FC | 1.519 | 1.512 | 0.641 | 1.506 | 1.524 | 0.269 | 0.582 | 2.20 | |
| FV | 96.11 | 96.11 | 0.999 | 96.11 | 96.11 | 1.00 | 0.999 | 5.73 | |
|
Breeder Age (Week - BA) |
Incubator Type (IT) |
P BA x IT |
CV (%) |
||||||
| 35 | 61 | P | SS | MS | P | ||||
| Carcass | 75.42 | 76.19 | 0.148 | 75.88 | 75.72 | 0.759 | 0.428 | 1.64 | |
| Breast | 40.30 | 42.10 | 0.013 | 41.28 | 41.11 | 0.792 | 0.276 | 3.93 | |
| Leg | 30.18 | 28.77 | 0.054 | 29.30 | 29.65 | 0.442 | 0.743 | 3.76 | |
| Wings | 10.26 | 9.94 | 0.360 | 10.18 | 10.01 | 0.611 | 0.529 | 8.12 | |
| Back | 18.30 | 17.88 | 0.449 | 17.89 | 18.28 | 0.479 | 0.432 | 7.34 | |
| A. F. | 1.07 | 0.84 | 0.141 | 0.91 | 0.99 | 0.579 | 0.654 | 37.79 | |
|
Breeder Age (Week - BA) |
Incubator Type (IT) |
P BA x IT |
CV (%) |
||||||
| 35 | 61 | P | SS | MS | P | ||||
| pH | 5.68 | 5.71 | 0.441 | 5.69 | 5.70 | 0.941 | 0.159 | 1.91 | |
| L | 54.14 | 54.26 | 0.866 | 54.38 | 54.02 | 0.586 | 0.744 | 3.01 | |
| a* | -0.64 | -0.93 | 0.503 | -0.79 | -0.77 | 0.533 | 0.781 | 73.04 | |
| b* | 9.86 | 9.50 | 0.593 | 9.27 | 10.09 | 0.238 | 0.241 | 16.97 | |
| WHC | 70.69 | 70.88 | 0.833 | 69.43 | 72.14 | ** | 0.821 | 3.07 | |
| CL | 17.51 | 15.78 | 0.408 | 17.05 | 16.24 | 0.695 | 0.382 | 30.08 | |
| SF | 2.081 | 2.174 | 0.683 | 2.025 | 2.234 | 0.365 | 0.607 | 26.81 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).