Submitted:
09 September 2025
Posted:
11 September 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. The Critical Role of Hygiene in the Indian Dairy Industry
1.2. The Chemistry and Formation of Dairy Fouling
1.3. Biofilm: The Resilient Microbiological Threat
1.4. Limitations of Conventional CIP and Alternative Approaches
1.5. Paper Objective
2. The ClogBuster System: Design and Principles
2.1. System Architecture
2.2. Material Selection and Standards
2.3. Nanobubble-Enhanced Chemical Action
- Physics of Nanobubbles: Due to their small size and negatively charged surfaces (high zeta potential), nanobubbles remain suspended in solution for extended periods via Brownian motion, creating a stable, high-concentration cleaning fluid. Their high internal pressure, a consequence of surface tension, is a key factor in their cleaning mechanism.
- Mechanism of Action: When these nanobubbles collapse on a surface (a process known as cavitation), they generate a localized energy burst, producing highly reactive hydroxyl radicals (•OH) from the dissociation of water and ozone. This intense oxidative effect can chemically cleave the complex organic molecules within the biofilm matrix and lyse bacterial cell walls, proving highly effective against even sanitizer-resistant pathogens like Listeria and spore-forming Bacillus species [8,16].
2.4. Slug Flow for Enhanced Mechanical Scouring
- Fluid Dynamics: Slug flow is characterized by large, bullet-shaped bubbles (known as Taylor bubbles) that occupy a significant portion of the pipe diameter, driving plugs of the nanobubble-rich liquid ahead of them.
- Mechanism of Action: This creates a powerful piston-like effect, pushing bulk debris out of the line. More importantly, the turbulent mixing zone at the front of each liquid slug generates extremely high wall shear stress, which acts as a “hydrodynamic scrubbing” force, physically tearing away the biofilm and fouling layers that have been chemically weakened by the nanobubbles. This mechanism is a proven strategy for mitigating clogs and ensuring the entire pipe circumference is aggressively cleaned [17].
2.5. Advanced Process Automation with ABB System 800xA
- Continuous Monitoring & Control: The platform integrates data from a suite of inline sensors—measuring nanobubble concentration, liquid velocity, system pressure, and cycle time—to gain a complete real-time understanding of the cleaning process.
- Dynamic Optimization: Based on this live data, the ABB System 800xA’s control algorithms dynamically adjust operational parameters. If turbidity in the return line is high, it can extend the cycle; if pressure rises, it can modulate the air injection rate. This ensures a perfect clean is achieved with the absolute minimum expenditure of water, energy, and time.
- Data Logging for Compliance and Analytics: Every parameter from every cleaning cycle is logged, time-stamped, and archived. This creates an unimpeachable record for quality assurance and regulatory audits (e.g., FSSAI). This data can also be analyzed over time to predict maintenance needs and further optimize the process.
3. Performance Analysis and Discussion
3.1. Efficacy Against Complex Biofilms
3.2. Economic Impact Analysis: A Detailed Case Study
-
Baseline (Conventional CIP):
- o
- Cycles per Day: 3
- o
- Water per Cycle: 5,000 L (Total: 15,000 L/day)
- o
- Cost of Water & Effluent Treatment (@ ₹100/1000L): ₹1,500/day
- o
- Cost of Chemicals & Energy per Day: ~₹3,500
- o
- Annual Baseline Operational Cost: ~₹18,25,000
-
Projected Performance (ClogBuster with ABB 800xA):
- o
- Resource Reduction (Conservative Estimate): 35%
- o
- Annual Operational Savings: ₹18,25,000 * 0.35 = ₹6,38,750
- Downtime Prevention: A single 8-hour production stoppage due to a severe clog is conservatively estimated to cost the plant ₹5,00,000 in lost revenue and labor. Preventing just one such event per year brings the total tangible benefit to over ₹11,00,000 annually.
3.3. Sustainability and Environmental Considerations
4. Implementation Challenges and Mitigation
- Financial Hurdles: The significant CAPEX for the hardware and the ABB System 800xA platform requires a strong, data-driven business case focused on long-term OPEX savings and ROI.
- Technical Hurdles: The system requires plant technicians skilled in maintaining not just mechanical components but also advanced automation and control systems.
- Regulatory Hurdles: The process would require thorough validation to meet the stringent standards of food safety authorities like the FSSAI.
5. Future Research and Development
- Phase 1 (Lab-Scale Prototype): Develop a lab-scale model to optimize the nanobubble generation and slug flow parameters for different pipe diameters and soil types. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) will include log reduction in microbial counts and % removal of a standardized fouling deposit.
- Phase 2 (Pilot-Plant Study): Install a full-scale ClogBuster unit at a partner dairy or research institution. This phase will focus on collecting long-term data on resource savings, maintenance requirements, and cleaning performance under real-world conditions.
- Phase 3 (Commercialization): Leverage the data from the pilot study to refine the design, standardize manufacturing, and develop a market-ready commercial product with a robust service and support network.
6. Conclusions
References
- Thomas, A., & Sathian, C. T. (2014). Cleaning-In-Place (CIP) System in Dairy Plant-.
- Review. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology, 8(6), 41-44.
- Bansal, B.,; Chen, X. D. Fouling of heat exchangers by dairy fluids – A review. International Journal of Dairy Technology 2006, 59, 105–124. [Google Scholar]
- Paneras, E. D.,; Jordan, W. K. Effects on Milk of Transportation Through a Pilot-Plant Pipeline. Journal of Dairy Science 1973, 56, 743–747. [Google Scholar]
- LaPointe, G., Wilson, T., Tarrah, A., Gagnon, M., & Roy, D. (2023). Biofilm Formation in Dairy: A Food Safety Concern. Journal of Dairy Science.
- Weber, M., Liedtke, J., Plattes, S.,; Lipski, A. Bacterial community composition of biofilms in milking machines of two dairy farms. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169346. [Google Scholar]
- Catania, A. M., Di Ciccio, P., Ferrocino, I., et al. (2023). Evaluation of the biofilmforming ability and molecular characterization of dairy Bacillus spp. isolates. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 13.
- Bassi, D., Cappa, F., Gazzola, S., Orrù, L., & Cocconcelli, P. S. (2015). Biofilm.
- Formation on Stainless Steel by Streptococcus thermophilus UC8547 in Milk Environments Is Mediated by the Proteinase PrtS. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 81(24).
- Unger, P., Sekhon, A. S., Sharma, S., et al. (2023). Impact of gas ultrafine bubbles on the efficacy of antimicrobials for eliminating Listeria monocytogenes biofilms on dairy processing surfaces. Food Control, 153. [CrossRef]
- Pant, K. J., Cotter, P. D., Wilkinson, M. G., & Sheehan, J. J. (2023). Towards sustainable Cleaning-in-Place (CIP) in dairy processing: Exploring enzyme-based approaches to cleaning in the Cheese industry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture.
- Guerrero-Navarro, A. E., Zamora, A., Ríos-Castillo, A. G., et al. (2023). Effectiveness of enzymatic treatment for reducing dairy fouling at pilot-plant scale under real cleaning conditions. Food Control, 153.
- Southgate, J. (2004). Wax Removal Using Pipeline Pigs [Doctoral Thesis, University of Durham].
- Schmidt, R. H., Erickson, D. J., Sims, S., & Wolff, P. (2009). Characteristics of Food Contact surface materials: stainless steel. Food Protection Trends, 29(7), 416-422.
- Dewangan, A. K. , Patel, A. D., & Bhadania, A. G. (2015). Stainless Steel for Dairy and Food Industry: A Review. Journal of Food Processing & Technology, 6(11).
- IS 3382 (1965): Stainless Steel Milk Pipes and Fittings. Bureau of Indian Standards.
- Chung, M. M. S. (2022). Development of Novel Cleaning-in-Place Operations for Food Processing Equipment Using Microbubbles [Doctoral Dissertation, Purdue University].
- Henderson, R. M. (2020). Efficacy of microscale/nanoscale aqueous ozone on the removal of Bacillus spp. biofilms from polyethersulfone membranes in the dairy industry [Master’s Thesis, Kansas State University].
- Dincau, B. , Tang, C., Dressaire, E., & Sauret, A. (2022). Clog mitigation in a microfluidic array via pulsatile flows. arXiv:2201.05725.
- Gates, R. S., Sagi, R., & Guest, R. W. (1983). Criteria for Optimizing Size and Configuration of Milk Pipelines. Journal of Dairy Science, 66(1), 143-152.
- Gajewska, J. , Chajęcka-Wierzchowska, W., Byczkowska-Rostkowska, Z., & Saki, M. (2021). Biofilm Formation in Dairy: A Food Safety Concern—Microbial community tracking from dairy farm to factory. Pathogens, 10(11), 1461.
- Slavov, A. K. (2017). General Characteristics and Treatment Possibilities of Dairy Wastewater – A Review. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 55(1), 14-28.
- ABB. (2016). System 800xA system planning, system version 6.0 (Document No. 3BSE041389-600 B).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).