Submitted:
09 September 2025
Posted:
09 September 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data acquisition
2.2. Modelling
3. Results
| Model | Relative | Attribute weight | |||||
| error (%) | Name | Time | Population | Inflation* | GDP | Unemployment* | |
| GLM | 1.2±0.3 | 0.257 | 0.022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Random forest | 1.1±0.5 | 0.232 | 0.030 | 0.019 | 0 | 0.004 | 0 |
| Decision trees | 0.4±0.3 | 0.237 | 0.012 | 0.005 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Deep Learning | 2.3±0.8 | 0.242 | 0.018 | 0 | 0.019 | 0 | 0 |
| GBT | 0.9±0.4 | 0.251 | 0.025 | 0.016 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Average | 0.24±0.01 | 0.021±0.007 | 0.008±0.009 | 0.004±0.008 | 0.001±0.002 | 0 | |
4. Discussion
Limitations of VIIRS Sensitivity to LED Wavelengths
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Longcore, T.; Rich, C. Ecological light pollution. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2004, 2, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaston, K.; Visser, M.; Hölker, F. The biological impacts of artificial light at night: The research challenge. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2015, 370, 20140133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kyba, C.C.M.; Kuester, T.; de Miguel, A.S.; Baugh, K.; Jechow, A.; Hölker, F.; Bennie, J.; Elvidge, C.D.; Gaston, K.J.; Guanter, L. Artificially lit surface of Earth at night increasing in radiance and extent. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1701528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falchi, F.; Cinzano, P.; Duriscoe, D.; Kyba, C.C.M.; Elvidge, C.D.; Baugh, K.; Portnov, B.A.; Rybnikova, N.A.; Furgoni, R. The new world atlas of artificial night sky brightness. Sci. Adv. 2016, arXiv:astro-ph.IM/1609.01041]2, e1600377–e1600377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bará, S. Local and global contributions to the artificial sky brightness. MNRAS 2021, 500, 5393–5403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barentine, J.C. Trends in light pollution: A comparative review of recent developments in measurement and policy. JQSRT 2022, 278, 108090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elvidge, C.D.; Baugh, K.; Zhizhin, M.; Hsu, F.; Ghosh, T. VIIRS night-time lights. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2017, 38, 5860–5879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cinzano, P.; Falchi, F.; Elvidge, C.D. The first World Atlas of the artificial night sky brightness. MNRAS 2001, 328, 689–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grauer, A.D.; Grauer, P.A.; Davies, N.; Davies, G. Impact of Space Weather on the Natural Night Sky. PASP 2019, 131, 114508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alarcon, M.R.; Serra-Ricart, M.; Lemes-Perera, S.; Mallorquín, M. Natural Night Sky Brightness during Solar Minimum. AJ 2021, 162, 25, [astro-ph.IM/2105.01066]. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallaway, T.; Olsen, R.N.; Mitchell, D.M. The economics of global light pollution. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 658–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borth, D.J.; Hopp, M.E. Human influence on light levels in the terrestrial environment. Environ. Rev. 2008, 16, 329–341. [Google Scholar]
- Hölker, F.; Wolter, C.; Perkin, E.K.; Tockner, K. Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25, 681–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Fan, Z.; Yan, J.; Bharat Kumar, Y.; Li, H.; Gao, D.Y.; Jiang, X.J. The Night Sky Spectrum of Xinglong Observatory: Changes from 2004 to 2015. PASP 2016, 128, 105004, [astro-ph.IM/1609.00137]. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelder, J.A.; Wedderburn, R.W.M. Generalized Linear Models. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 1972, 135, 370–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breiman, L. Data Mining with Decision Trees. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- LeCun, Y.; Bengio, Y.; Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 2015, 521, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.; Guestrin, C. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, NY, USA, 2016; KDD ’16, p. 785–794. [CrossRef]
- Mahmood, Y.; Kama, N.; Azmi, A.; Khan, A.S.; Ali, M. Software effort estimation accuracy prediction of machine learning techniques: A systematic performance evaluation. Softw. Pract. Exp. 2022, 52, 39–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, C.; Bai, Y. Evaluation of VIIRS night-time light data for mapping global urban lighting and its environmental impacts. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 9129–9158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CPRE. Campaign to Protect Rural England - Shedding light on light pollution: tackling artificial light at night. 2020.
- Department for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy. Guidance on lighting and minimising light pollution. 2019.
- Ozawa, L. Operation of FL Lamps with ±3G Electron Sources in Ar Gas Space as a Most Clean Energy Light Source. Int. J. Adv. Res. Phys. Sci. 2019, 6, 10–23. [Google Scholar]





| Class | Colour | Ratio | Artificial brightness | Approximate total sky | Visual impacts |
| code | [Art./Nat.] | (cd m−2) | brightness(mcd m−2) | ||
| 1 | Black | <0.01 | <1.74 | <0.176 | Pristine sky |
| 2 | Dark gray | 0.01-0.02 | 1.74–3.48 | 0.176–0.177 | Degraded near horizon |
| 3 | Gray | 0.02-0.04 | 3.48–6.96 | 0.177–0.181 | Degraded near horizon |
| 4 | Dark blue | 0.04-0.08 | 6.96–13.9 | 0.181–0.188 | Degraded near horizon |
| 5 | Blue | 0.08-0.16 | 13.9–27.8 | 0.188–0.202 | Degraded to zenith |
| 6 | Light blue | 0.16-0.32 | 27.8–55.7 | 0.202–0.230 | Degraded to zenith |
| 7 | Dark green | 0.32-0.64 | 55.7–111 | 0.230–0.285 | Degraded to zenith - Natural sky lost |
| 8 | Green | 0.64-1.28 | 111–223 | 0.285–0.397 | Natural sky lost |
| 9 | Yellow | 1.28-2.56 | 223–445 | 0.397–0.619 | Natural sky lost |
| 10 | Orange | 2.56-5.12 | 445–890 | 0.619–1.065 | Natural sky lost - Milky Way lost |
| 11 | Red | 5.12-10.2 | 890–1780 | 1.07–1.96 | Milky Way lost |
| 12 | Magenta | 10.2-20.5 | 1780–3560 | 1.96–3.74 | Milky Way lost - Cone stimulation |
| 13 | Pink | 20.5-41 | 3560–7130 | 3.74–7.30 | Cone stimulation |
| 14 | White | >41 | >7130 | >7.30 | Cone stimulation |







Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).