Submitted:
08 September 2025
Posted:
09 September 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Participant Criteria
2.2. Genetic Mutation Detection
2.3. Data Collection
2.4. Statistical Analysis
2.5. Ethical Considerations
3. Results
3.1. Patient Demographics and Baseline Characteristics
3.2. Genetic Mutation Analysis
3.3. Clinical Correlations
4. Discussion
4.1. Prevalence and Patterns of Genetic Mutations
4.2. Resistance Patterns and Clinical Implications
4.3. Clinical Correlations and Disease Severity
4.4. Therapeutic Implications
4.5. Global Context and Comparative Analysis
5. Conclusions
Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Global Tuberculosis Report 2023. 1st ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. 1 p.
- Salari N, Kanjoori AH, Hosseinian-Far A, Hasheminezhad R, Mansouri K, Mohammadi M. Global prevalence of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Dis Poverty. 2023 May 25;12(1):57. [CrossRef]
- Yu S, Girotto S, Lee C, Magliozzo RS. Reduced Affinity for Isoniazid in the S315T Mutant ofMycobacterium tuberculosis KatG Is a Key Factor in Antibiotic Resistance*. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003 Apr 25;278(17):14769–75. [CrossRef]
- Unissa AN, Subbian S, Hanna LE, Selvakumar N. Overview on mechanisms of isoniazid action and resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Genet Evol. 2016 Nov;45:474–92. [CrossRef]
- Seifert M, Catanzaro D, Catanzaro A, Rodwell TC. Genetic mutations associated with isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119628. [CrossRef]
- Prevalence and molecular characteristics of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Hainan, China: from 2014 to 2019 | BMC Microbiology | Full Text [Internet]. [cited 2025 Aug 1]. Available from: https://bmcmicrobiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12866-021-02246-7.
- Ng KCS, Supply P, Cobelens FGJ, Gaudin C, Gonzalez-Martin J, de Jong BC, et al. How Well Do Routine Molecular Diagnostics Detect Rifampin Heteroresistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis? J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Nov;57(11):e00717-19. [CrossRef]
- Walker TM, Kohl TA, Omar SV, Hedge J, Del Ojo Elias C, Bradley P, et al. Whole-genome sequencing for prediction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug susceptibility and resistance: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Oct;15(10):1193–202. [CrossRef]
- Miotto P, Tessema B, Tagliani E, Chindelevitch L, Starks AM, Emerson C, et al. A standardised method for interpreting the association between mutations and phenotypic drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Eur Respir J. 2017 Dec;50(6):1701354. [CrossRef]
- Vilchèze C, Wang F, Arai M, Hazbón MH, Colangeli R, Kremer L, et al. Transfer of a point mutation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis inhA resolves the target of isoniazid. Nat Med. 2006 Sep;12(9):1027–9. [CrossRef]
- Jo KW, Yoon YS, Kim HW, Kim JY, Kang YA. Diagnosis and Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Adults in South Korea. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2024 Oct 4;88(1):56–68. [CrossRef]
- Zhou A, Nawaz M, Duan Y, Moore JE, Millar BC, Xu J, et al. Molecular characterization of isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Xi’an, China. Microb Drug Resist. 2011 Jun;17(2):275–81. [CrossRef]
- Unissa AN, Selvakumar N, Narayanan S, Suganthi C, Hanna LE. Investigation of Ser315 Substitutions within katG Gene in Isoniazid-Resistant Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from South India. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:257983.
- Anukool U, Phunpae P, Tharinjaroen CS, Butr-Indr B, Saikaew S, Netirat N, et al. Genotypic Distribution and a Potential Diagnostic Assay of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Northern Thailand. Infection and Drug Resistance. 2020 Sep 30;13:3375–82. [CrossRef]
- Wengenack NL, Uhl JR, St Amand AL, Tomlinson AJ, Benson LM, Naylor S, et al. Recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis KatG(S315T) is a competent catalase-peroxidase with reduced activity toward isoniazid. J Infect Dis. 1997 Sep;176(3):722–7.
- Marttila HJ, Soini H, Huovinen P, Viljanen MK. katG mutations in isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates recovered from Finnish patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Sep;40(9):2187–9. [CrossRef]
- Bertrand T, Eady NAJ, Jones JN, Jesmin null, Nagy JM, Jamart-Grégoire B, et al. Crystal structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis catalase-peroxidase. J Biol Chem. 2004 Sep 10;279(37):38991–9. [CrossRef]
- Hazbón MH, Brimacombe M, Bobadilla del Valle M, Cavatore M, Guerrero MI, Varma-Basil M, et al. Population Genetics Study of Isoniazid Resistance Mutations and Evolution of Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Aug;50(8):2640–9. [CrossRef]
- Machado D, Couto I, Perdigão J, Rodrigues L, Portugal I, Baptista P, et al. Contribution of efflux to the emergence of isoniazid and multidrug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34538. [CrossRef]
- Banerjee A, Dubnau E, Quemard A, Balasubramanian V, Um KS, Wilson T, et al. inhA, a gene encoding a target for isoniazid and ethionamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science. 1994 Jan 14;263(5144):227–30. [CrossRef]
- Rozwarski DA, Grant GA, Barton DH, Jacobs WR, Sacchettini JC. Modification of the NADH of the isoniazid target (InhA) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science. 1998 Jan 2;279(5347):98–102. [CrossRef]
- Basso LA, Zheng R, Musser JM, Jacobs WR, Blanchard JS. Mechanisms of isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: enzymatic characterization of enoyl reductase mutants identified in isoniazid-resistant clinical isolates. J Infect Dis. 1998 Sep;178(3):769–75. [CrossRef]
- Operario DJ, Koeppel AF, Turner SD, Bao Y, Pholwat S, Banu S, et al. Prevalence and extent of heteroresistance by next generation sequencing of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176522. [CrossRef]
- Resistance to Isoniazid and Ethionamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Genes, Mutations, and Causalities | Microbiology Spectrum [Internet]. [cited 2025 Aug 1]. [CrossRef]
- Huyen MNT, Cobelens FGJ, Buu TN, Lan NTN, Dung NH, Kremer K, et al. Epidemiology of isoniazid resistance mutations and their effect on tuberculosis treatment outcomes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Aug;57(8):3620–7. [CrossRef]
- Nguyen HQ, Nguyen NV, Contamin L, Tran THT, Vu TT, Nguyen HV, et al. Quadruple-first line drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Vietnam: What can we learn from genes? Infect Genet Evol. 2017 Jun;50:55–61. [CrossRef]
- Gagneux S, Long CD, Small PM, Van T, Schoolnik GK, Bohannan BJM. The competitive cost of antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science. 2006 Jun 30;312(5782):1944–6. [CrossRef]
- Casali N, Nikolayevskyy V, Balabanova Y, Harris SR, Ignatyeva O, Kontsevaya I, et al. Evolution and transmission of drug resistant tuberculosis in a Russian population. Nat Genet. 2014 Mar;46(3):279–86. [CrossRef]
- Borrell S, Gagneux S. Infectiousness, reproductive fitness and evolution of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009 Dec;13(12):1456–66.
- Vilchèze C, Hartman T, Weinrick B, Jacobs WR. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is extraordinarily sensitive to killing by a vitamin C-induced Fenton reaction. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1881. [CrossRef]
- Whole-genome sequencing of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains identifies compensatory mutations in RNA polymerase genes | Nature Genetics [Internet]. [cited 2025 Aug 1]. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/ng.1038.
- Cohen T, Sommers B, Murray M. The effect of drug resistance on the fitness of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003 Jan;3(1):13–21. [CrossRef]
- Müller B, Borrell S, Rose G, Gagneux S. The heterogeneous evolution of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Trends Genet. 2013 Mar;29(3):160–9. [CrossRef]
- WHO consolidated guidelines on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment [Internet]. [cited 2025 Aug 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550529.
- Nahid P, Dorman SE, Alipanah N, Barry PM, Brozek JL, Cattamanchi A, et al. Executive Summary: Official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines: Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2016 Oct 1;63(7):853–67.
- Dheda K, Gumbo T, Maartens G, Dooley KE, McNerney R, Murray M, et al. The epidemiology, pathogenesis, transmission, diagnosis, and management of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, and incurable tuberculosis. Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Mar 15;S2213-2600(17)30079-6. [CrossRef]
- Somoskovi A, Parsons LM, Salfinger M. The molecular basis of resistance to isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Respir Res. 2001;2(3):164–8. [CrossRef]
- Rigouts L, Gumusboga M, de Rijk WB, Nduwamahoro E, Uwizeye C, de Jong B, et al. Rifampin Resistance Missed in Automated Liquid Culture System for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates with Specific rpoB Mutations. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Aug;51(8):2641–5. [CrossRef]
- Alsaad N, van Altena R, Pranger AD, van Soolingen D, de Lange WCM, van der Werf TS, et al. Evaluation of co-trimoxazole in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Eur Respir J. 2013 Aug;42(2):504–12.
- Dawson R, Diacon AH, Everitt D, van Niekerk C, Donald PR, Burger DA, et al. Efficiency and safety of the combination of moxifloxacin, pretomanid (PA-824), and pyrazinamide during the first 8 weeks of antituberculosis treatment: a phase 2b, open-label, partly randomised trial in patients with drug-susceptible or drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Lancet. 2015 May 2;385(9979):1738–47. [CrossRef]
- Pasipanodya JG, Gumbo T. A meta-analysis of self-administered vs directly observed therapy effect on microbiologic failure, relapse, and acquired drug resistance in tuberculosis patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jul;57(1):21–31. [CrossRef]
- Ahmad S, Mokaddas E. Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Respir Med. 2009 Dec;103(12):1777–90.
- Conradie F, Diacon AH, Ngubane N, Howell P, Everitt D, Crook AM, et al. Treatment of Highly Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):893–902. [CrossRef]
- Nunn AJ, Phillips PPJ, Meredith SK, Chiang CY, Conradie F, Dalai D, et al. A Trial of a Shorter Regimen for Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 28;380(13):1201–13. [CrossRef]
- Boehme CC, Nabeta P, Hillemann D, Nicol MP, Shenai S, Krapp F, et al. Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 9;363(11):1005–15. [CrossRef]
- Chakravorty S, Simmons AM, Rowneki M, Parmar H, Cao Y, Ryan J, et al. The New Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra: Improving Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Resistance to Rifampin in an Assay Suitable for Point-of-Care Testing. mBio. 2017 Aug 29;8(4):e00812-17. [CrossRef]
- Saglik I, Oz Y, Kiraz N. Evaluation of the GenoType MTBDR assay for detection of rifampicin and isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2014;32(3):318–22. [CrossRef]
- CRyPTIC Consortium and the 100,000 Genomes Project, Allix-Béguec C, Arandjelovic I, Bi L, Beckert P, Bonnet M, et al. Prediction of Susceptibility to First-Line Tuberculosis Drugs by DNA Sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 11;379(15):1403–15.
- Gygli SM, Borrell S, Trauner A, Gagneux S. Antimicrobial resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: mechanistic and evolutionary perspectives. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2017 May 1;41(3):354–73. [CrossRef]
- Banu S, Honoré N, Saint-Joanis B, Philpott D, Prévost MC, Cole ST. Are the PE-PGRS proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis variable surface antigens? Mol Microbiol. 2002 Apr;44(1):9–19. [CrossRef]
- Sandgren A, Strong M, Muthukrishnan P, Weiner BK, Church GM, Murray MB. Tuberculosis drug resistance mutation database. PLoS Med. 2009 Feb 10;6(2):e2. [CrossRef]
- Eldholm V, Monteserin J, Rieux A, Lopez B, Sobkowiak B, Ritacco V, et al. Four decades of transmission of a multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis outbreak strain. Nat Commun. 2015 May 11;6(1):7119. [CrossRef]
- Farhat MR, Shapiro BJ, Kieser KJ, Sultana R, Jacobson KR, Victor TC, et al. Genomic analysis identifies targets of convergent positive selection in drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Genet. 2013 Oct;45(10):1183–9. [CrossRef]
- Liu Q, Luo T, Dong X, Sun G, Liu Z, Gan M, et al. Genetic features of Mycobacterium tuberculosis modern Beijing sublineage. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2016 Feb 24;5(2):e14. [CrossRef]
- Merker M, Blin C, Mona S, et al. Evolutionary history and global spread of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing lineage. Nat Genet. 2015;47(3):242-9. [CrossRef]
| Characteristic | n | % |
| Age (years) | ||
| Mean ± SD | 46.62 ± 17.59 | |
| Range | 18-75 | |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 33 | 58.92 |
| Female | 23 | 41.08 |
| Body Mass Index (kg/m2) | ||
| Mean ± SD | 19.5 ± 2.12 | |
| Underweight (<18.5) | 18 | 32.14 |
| Normal (18.5-24.9) | 35 | 62.50 |
| Overweight (≥25) | 3 | 5.36 |
| Treatment History | ||
| Previously treated | 14 | 25.00 |
| Treatment-naïve | 42 | 75.00 |
| Comorbidities | ||
| Diabetes mellitus | 7 | 12.50 |
| Hepatitis B/C | 6 | 10.71 |
| Other conditions | 9 | 16.07 |
| No comorbidities | 34 | 60.72 |
| Clinical Feature | n | % |
| Constitutional Symptoms | ||
| Fever | 19 | 33.92 |
| Weight loss | 45 | 80.36 |
| Night sweats | 28 | 50.00 |
| Respiratory Symptoms | ||
| Persistent cough | 46 | 82.14 |
| Hemoptysis | 13 | 23.21 |
| Dyspnea | 18 | 32.14 |
| Chest pain | 31 | 55.35 |
| Physical Examination | ||
| Pulmonary rales | 47 | 83.92 |
| Decreased breath sounds | 22 | 39.29 |
| Lymphadenopathy | 8 | 14.29 |
| Parameter | n | % |
| Chest X-ray Findings | ||
| Cavitary lesions | 22 | 39.28 |
| Bilateral involvement | 27 | 48.21 |
| Upper lobe predominance | 35 | 62.50 |
| Pleural effusion | 8 | 14.29 |
| AFB Smear Results | ||
| Negative | 30 | 53.57 |
| Scanty | 4 | 7.14 |
| 1+ | 10 | 17.86 |
| 2+ | 6 | 10.71 |
| 3+ | 6 | 10.71 |
| GeneXpert MTB/Rif | ||
| MTB detected | 50 | 89.28 |
| Rifampicin resistance detected | 25 | 44.64 |
| Rifampicin resistance not detected | 25 | 44.64 |
| Drug Resistance Pattern | ||
| INH mono-resistance | 18 | 32.14 |
| MDR-TB (INH + RIF) | 25 | 44.64 |
| Poly-resistance | 13 | 23.22 |
| Gene | Patients with mutations | Percentage | Total mutations detected |
| katG only | 11 | 19.6% | 17 |
| inhA only | 7 | 12.5% | 96 |
| Both katG and inhA | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| No mutations detected | 38 | 67.9% | 0 |
| Codon Position | Nucleotide Change | Amino Acid Change | Patients (n) | % of katG-positive patients | % of total mutations |
| 315 | C>G | Ser>Thr | 11 | 100.0 | 64.7 |
| 174 | T>C | Glu>Gly | 2 | 18.2 | 11.8 |
| 447 | Multiple nucleotide | Complex change* | 1 | 9.1 | 5.9 |
| 454 | C>T | Glu>Glu | 1 | 9.1 | 5.9 |
| 458 | G>A/A>T | Leu>Phe/Leu>Leu | 2 | 18.2 | 11.8 |
| Mutation Characteristic | Number of Patients | Percentage | Number of Mutations | Percentage of Total |
| Location | ||||
| Codon cluster 233-240 | 7 | 100.0% | 37 | 42.5% |
| Other regions | 0 | 0% | 59 | 57.5% |
| Functional Impact | ||||
| Amino acid changing (missense) | 7 | 100.0% | 63 | 65.6% |
| Silent mutations | 0 | 0% | 33 | 34.4% |
| Total mutations per patient | ||||
| Range | 8-18 mutations per patient | |||
| Mean ± SD | 13.7 ± 4.2 mutations per patient |
| Resistance Pattern | Total (n) | katG mutations | inhA mutations | No mutations |
| INH mono-resistance | 18 | 3 (16.7%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (83.3%) |
| MDR-TB (INH + RIF) | 25 | 6 (24.0%) | 6 (24.0%) | 13 (52.0%) |
| Poly-resistance | 13 | 2 (15.4%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (84.6%) |
| P-value | 0.678 | 0.012 | 0.023 |
| Characteristic | katG positive (n=11) | inhA positive (n=7) | No mutations (n=38) | P-value |
| Demographics | ||||
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 42.5 ± 16.6 | 39.4 ± 18.8 | 49.1 ± 17.5 | >0.05 |
| Male gender, n (%) | 6 (54.5) | 4 (57.1) | 23 (60.5) | >0.05 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD | 20.2 ± 2.8 | 19.8 ± 1.5 | 19.5 ± 2.9 | >0.05 |
| Clinical History | ||||
| Previous TB treatment, n (%) | 3 (27.3) | 1 (14.3) | 10 (26.3) | >0.05 |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 2 (18.2) | 1 (14.3) | 4 (10.5) | >0.05 |
| Symptoms | ||||
| Fever, n (%) | 5 (45.5) | 3 (42.9) | 11 (28.9) | >0.05 |
| Persistent cough, n (%) | 11 (100.0) | 7 (100.0) | 36 (94.7) | >0.05 |
| Hemoptysis, n (%) | 2 (18.2) | 4 (57.1) | 7 (18.4) | 0.067 |
| Dyspnea, n (%) | 4 (36.4) | 3 (42.9) | 11 (28.9) | >0.05 |
| Chest pain, n (%) | 7 (63.6) | 4 (57.1) | 20 (52.6) | >0.05 |
| Physical Examination | ||||
| Pulmonary rales, n (%) | 10 (90.9) | 6 (85.7) | 13 (34.2) | <0.001 |
| Weight loss, n (%) | 9 (81.8) | 6 (85.7) | 30 (78.9) | >0.05 |
| Characteristic | katG positive (n=11) | inhA positive (n=7) | No mutations (n=38) | P-value |
| Radiological Findings | ||||
| Cavitary lesions, n (%) | 3 (27.3) | 3 (42.9) | 16 (42.1) | >0.05 |
| Bilateral involvement, n (%) | 4 (36.4) | 3 (42.9) | 20 (52.6) | >0.05 |
| Upper lobe predominance, n (%) | 8 (72.7) | 5 (71.4) | 22 (57.9) | >0.05 |
| Laboratory Results | ||||
| AFB smear positive, n (%) | 5 (45.5) | 3 (42.9) | 18 (47.4) | >0.05 |
| GeneXpert MTB positive, n (%) | 10 (90.9) | 6 (85.7) | 34 (89.5) | >0.05 |
| Bacterial Load (AFB grade) | ||||
| Scanty/1+, n (%) | 3 (27.3) | 2 (28.6) | 9 (23.7) | >0.05 |
| 2+/3+, n (%) | 2 (18.2) | 1 (14.3) | 9 (23.7) | >0.05 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).