Submitted:
30 August 2025
Posted:
02 September 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Problem Statement
1.2. Objectives
- Review and evaluate current research on low-cost IoT and computer vision applications in smart irrigation, focusing on water efficiency, crop productivity, and scalability in diverse agricultural contexts.
- Identify core technologies, including IoT sensors, communication protocols, computer vision algorithms, and microcontrollers, used in cost-effective smart irrigation systems.
1.3. Scope
1.4. Motivation
1.5. Methodology
2. Literature Review
2.1. IoT-Driven Irrigation Systems
2.2. Machine Learning and Intelligent Decision Support Systems
2.3. Advanced Control and Automation Techniques
2.4. Low-Cost, Scalable, and Sustainable Solutions
2.5. Novel and Sustainable Approaches
2.6. Few Case Studies
2.7. Summary
3. Study on Cost-Effective Irrigation Systems
4. Discussion
4.1. Integration of IoT and Computer Vision in Smart Irrigation
4.2. Communication Technologies in IoT-Based Irrigation
4.3. Computer Vision Technologies in Smart Irrigation
4.4. Benefits of IoT and Computer Vision in Irrigation
5. Basic Steps of an IoT and Computer Vision Integrated Smart Irrigation System
5.1. Data Collection
5.2. Error and Fault Detection
5.3. Data Processing
5.4. Wireless Communication
5.5. System Activation and Irrigation Control
6. Cost Efficiency of the Irrigation System
- Low-Cost and Energy-Efficient Hardware: Selection of inexpensive, energy-efficient components such as soil moisture, temperature, and humidity sensors, along with low-power microcontrollers (e.g., ESP32, Arduino) and computer vision cameras with power-saving modes, significantly reduces hardware and energy expenses.
- Open-Source Software: Leveraging open-source platforms for control logic, data processing, and analytics eliminates licensing fees and lowers software development costs. Libraries like TensorFlow Lite, OpenCV, and Node-RED can support advanced functionalities at minimal expense.
- Cloud-Based Services: Utilizing cloud infrastructure for data storage and processing offers scalable, pay-as-you-go pricing models. This avoids large upfront infrastructure investments while enabling flexible data management and system expansion.
- Optimized Communication Protocols: Employing low-bandwidth, long-range wireless technologies such as LoRaWAN or Zigbee minimizes data transmission costs, particularly in rural or large-scale deployments with limited cellular coverage.
- Data Compression and Aggregation: Aggregating and compressing sensor and image data before transmission conserves bandwidth and reduces cloud storage requirements. Techniques such as local filtering and threshold-based reporting can significantly lower recurring operational costs.
- Edge Computing: Processing data locally on IoT nodes or edge gateways reduces cloud dependency and network latency. This approach not only lowers data transmission costs but also enables faster decision-making in real-time irrigation control.
- Modular and Scalable Architecture: Designing systems with modular components allows for incremental expansion as needed. This ensures that investment scales with demand, avoiding unnecessary upfront expenditure.
- Lifecycle Cost Consideration: A comprehensive lifecycle cost analysis—including procurement, installation, maintenance, and eventual replacement—enables more informed budgeting and investment strategies that prioritize long-term savings over short-term gains.
- Return on Investment (ROI) Evaluation: Conducting ROI analyses that account for water savings, enhanced crop yield, labor reduction, and decreased input costs helps to justify the initial investment. Quantifiable economic benefits can support farmer adoption and policy support.
7. Techniques Used in Smart Irrigation Systems
Arduino-Based Systems
Fuzzy Logic Controllers
NodeMCU and ESP8266 Modules
FIWARE Framework
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs)
8. Gaps Identified
- Cost-effectiveness: Many current systems are prohibitively expensive for smallholder or resource-limited farmers.
- Robust design and durability: Field-deployed devices must withstand harsh environmental conditions and function reliably over time.
- Portability and autonomy: Systems need to be lightweight, self-powered, and easily deployable across different farming landscapes.
- Low maintenance: Maintenance-free or low-maintenance systems are essential to reduce operational burdens on farmers.
- Reliability: Accurate and uninterrupted data collection and decision-making are vital for trust and effectiveness.
9. General Architecture of IoT-Based Irrigation Systems
Four-Layer Model
- Things Layer: Comprising the physical sensors and actuators embedded in the field.
- Edge Layer: Responsible for preliminary data processing and control operations near the source.
- Communication Layer: Facilitates reliable data exchange between edge devices and cloud systems.
- Cloud Layer: Offers scalable storage, advanced analytics, and remote management capabilities.
Tiered Functional Architecture
- Lower Tier: Sensor nodes and actuators directly interact with the agricultural environment.
- Intermediate Tier: Gateways or edge devices handle data aggregation and local decision-making.
- Upper Tier: Cloud infrastructure supports high-level analytics, application interfaces, and long-term data storage [4].
10. Future Direction
10.1. Enhanced Sensor–Vision Integration
10.2. Edge Computing for Real-Time Decision Making
10.3. Energy Harvesting and Low-Power Design
10.4. Development of Cost-Effective Sensors
10.5. Privacy and Data Security
10.6. Localization and Adaptive Systems
10.7. Interoperability and Open Standards
10.8. Field Testing and Participatory Design
11. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| Abbreviation | Definition |
| IoT | Internet of Things |
| GSM | Global System for Mobile Communications |
| LoRa | Long Range |
| NodeMCU | Node Microcontroller Unit |
| ML | Machine Learning |
| MQTT | Message Queuing Telemetry Transport |
| NDVI | Normalized Difference Vegetation Index |
| YOLO | You Only Look Once |
| UAV | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle |
| CNN | Convolutional Neural Network |
References
- Daniel T. Afolayan, Bamidele Adeyemi, and Halimat Yusuf. Economic viability of solar-powered iot-based irrigation systems in sub-saharan africa. Sustainable Agriculture Technologies, 5(1):33–44, 2024.
- Javier Alanya-Arango, Joel Alanya-Beltran, Sathish Kumar Ravichandran, Barinderjit Singh, Archana Sasi, and Durgaprasad Gangodkar. Internet of things and machine learning based intelligent irrigation system for agriculture. In 2022 5th International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I), pages 67–72. IEEE, 2022.
- A Sherly Alphonse, V Suresh Kumar, N Meenakshisundaram, S Gomathi, et al. Iot and svm-based smart irrigation system for sustainable water usage. In 2022 International Conference on Innovative Computing, Intelligent Communication and Smart Electrical Systems (ICSES), pages 1–8. IEEE, 2022.
- Muhammad Ayaz, Mohammad Ammad-Uddin, Zubair Sharif, Ali Mansour, and El-Hadi M. Aggoune. Internet-of-things (iot)-based smart agriculture: Toward making the fields talk. IEEE Access, 7:129551–129583, 2019. [CrossRef]
- Yohannes Bekuma Bakare. Machine learning-based smart irrigation system and soil nutrients analysis to increase productivity in agriculture field. In Proceedings of the AIP Conference, volume 2523, page 020030, 2023. [CrossRef]
- R Baskar, G Arun Kumar, and D Karan. Smart agricultural remote monitoring system for better soil health using iot. International journal of health sciences, 6(S8):1239–1251, 2022. [CrossRef]
- T. Anil Chowdary, D. V. Chakravarthy, R. V. Siva Rupesh, T. Sai Charan Ashish, and V. Hemanth Sai Charan. Effective implementation of low-cost smart irrigation system. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 8(6):1805–1809, 2019. URL https://www.ijitee.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/v8i6/F4084048619.pdf. Retrieval Number: F4084048619/19©BEIESP.
- Rafiq Das, Tania Hossain, and Aminur Rahman. Lifecycle cost analysis of smart drip irrigation in smallholder farms in bangladesh. Irrigation Science, 41(2):211–225, 2023.
- R. K. Deka and M. Saikia. Cost-effective smart irrigation systems in agriculture. [CrossRef]
- Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Neil Houlsby. An image is worth 16×16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2021), 2021. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=YicbFdNTTy. Published as an oral presentation.
- Elgaali Elgaali, Jamil Al Titi, Ahmed Ismail, and Omer Alhajri. Smart irrigation system using arduino. In 2023 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2023.
- O. Elijah, T.A. Rahman, I. Orikumhi, C.Y. Leow, and M.N. Hindia. An overview of internet of things (iot) and data analytics in agriculture: Benefits and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(5):3758–3773, 2018. [CrossRef]
- FAO. The State of Food and Agriculture 2022: Leveraging Automation for Sustainable Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2022. Available at: https://www.fao.org/publications/sofa/2022/en.
- Francisco Javier Ferrández-Pastor, Juan Manuel García-Chamizo, Mario Nieto-Hidalgo, Jerónimo Mora-Pascual, and José Mora-Martínez. Precision agriculture design method using a distributed computing architecture on internet of things context. Sensors, 18(6):1731, 2018. [CrossRef]
- Mohamed Haziq, Wai Leong Pang, Kah Yoong Chan, It Ee Lee, Gwo Chin Chung, and Sew Kin Wong. High-efficiency low-cost smart iot agriculture irrigation, soil’s fertility and moisture controlling system. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(6):785–793, 2022. [CrossRef]
- E. Raymond Hunt Jr, Michel Cavigelli, Craig S.T. Daughtry, James E. McMurtrey III, and Charles L. Walthall. Evaluation of digital photography from model aircraft for remote sensing of crop biomass and nitrogen status. Precision Agriculture, 11(6):587–601, 2010. [CrossRef]
- Saikumar Iyer, PankajKumar Patro, Rajdeep Kapadia, Abhishek Das, Sanish Cheriyan, and Namrata Ansari. Iot based cost-effective centralised smart irrigation system using lora. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advances in Science & Technology (ICAST), 2020.
- E Srie Vidhya Janani and A Rehash Rushmi Pavitra. Cost effective smart farming with fars-based underwater wireless sensor networks. In Research Anthology on Strategies for Achieving Agricultural Sustainability, pages 628–649. IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2022.
- K. Jha, A. Doshi, P. Patel, and M. Shah. A comprehensive review on automation in agriculture using artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, 2:1–12, 2019. [CrossRef]
- Min Jiang, Reeva Patel, and Lars Schneider. Farm-lightseek: A lightweight edge aiot system for real-time irrigation optimization using multimodal data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 213:108325, 2025.
- Harsh Joshi. Edge-ai for agriculture: Lightweight vision models for disease detection in resource-limited settings. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18635, 2024.
- Denis Mamba Kabala, Adel Hafiane, Laurent Bobelin, and Raphael Canals. Loss-guided model sharing and local learning correction in decentralized federated learning for crop disease classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23063, arXiv:2505.23063, 2025.
- N. Khan, R.L. Ray, G.R. Sargani, M. Ihtisham, M. Khayyam, and S. Ismail. Current progress and future prospects of agriculture technology: gateway to sustainable agriculture. Sustainability, 13(9):4883, 2021. [CrossRef]
- V Anand Kumar, S Vishnupriyan, K Sheikdavood, P Gomathi, et al. Iot and artificial intelligence-based low-cost smart modules for smart irrigation systems. In 2022 International Conference on Automation, Computing and Renewable Systems (ICACRS), pages 254–260. IEEE, 2022.
- A. Li, M. Markovic, P. Edwards, and G. Leontidis. A blockchain-assisted trusted federated learning for smart agriculture. SN Computer Science, 6(2):167, 2025a.
- Long Li, Jiajia Li, Dong Chen, Lina Pu, Haibo Yao, and Yanbo Huang. Vllfl: A vision-language model based lightweight federated learning framework for smart agriculture. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13365, arXiv:2504.13365, 2025b.
- K.G. Liakos, P. Busato, D. Moshou, S. Pearson, and D. Bochtis. Machine learning in agriculture: a review. Sensors, 18(8):2674, 2018. [CrossRef]
- Jyotsna Malla, J. Jayashree, and J. Vijayashree. Low-cost smart irrigation control system using temperature and distance sensors. In Smart Applications and Data Analysis. SADASC 2022, volume 1677 of Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer, Cham, 2023. [CrossRef]
- A. Mhaned, S. Mouatassim, M. El Haji, and J. Benhra. Low-cost smart irrigation system based on internet of things and fuzzy logic. In Laurent Koutti et al., editors, Smart Applications and Data Analysis. SADASC 2022, volume 1677 of Communications in Computer and Information Science, pages 125–135. Springer, Cham, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Hema Nagaraja and Krishna Kant. Cost-effective smart irrigation controller using automatic weather stations. International Journal of Hydrology Science and Technology, 9(1):1––27, 2019. [CrossRef]
- Emilio Navarro, Nuno Costa, and António Pereira. A systematic review of iot solutions for smart farming. Sensors, 20(15):4231, 2020. [CrossRef]
- Minal Patil, Abhishek Madankar, and Shital Telrandhe. An iot-based cost-effective intelligent irrigation system for farmers. In 2023 7th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), pages 458–462. IEEE, 2023.
- Nyakuri Jean Pierre, Bikorimana Sefu, Bahizi Venuste, Mirembe Jean D’Amour, Kanyarwanda Daniel, Nzemerimana Jean Pierre, Kalisa Jean Bosco, and Harerimana Felix. Smart crops irrigation system with low energy consumption. Journal of Appropriate Technology, 9(1):9–19, 2023. [CrossRef]
- Francisco Puig, Juan Antonio Rodríguez Díaz, and María Auxiliadora Soriano. Development of a low-cost open-source platform for smart irrigation systems. Agronomy, 12(12):2909–2927, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Md MU Saleheen, Md S Islam, R Fahad, Md JB Belal, and Riasat Khan. Iot-based smart agriculture monitoring system. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Engineering and Technology (IICAIET), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2022.
- Mane Siddhesh Sampatrao. Design and development of cost effective real time soil moisture based automatic irrigation system with gsm. M.tech thesis, Dr. Mane Siddhesh Sampatrao. Design and development of cost effective real time soil moisture based automatic irrigation system with gsm. M.tech thesis, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth (DBSKKV), Dapoli, 2019. URL https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810117106. Accessed on , 2025.
- M. Senthil Vadivu, M. Purushotham Reddy, Kantilal Rane, Narendra Kumar, A. Karthikayen, and Nitesh Behare. An iot-based system for managing and monitoring smart irrigation through mobile integration. Journal of Machine and Computing, 3(3):196–205, 2023. [CrossRef]
- Najmus Sakib Sizan, Md Abu Layek, and Khondokar Fida Hasan. A secured triad of iot, machine learning, and blockchain for crop forecasting in agriculture. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.01196, arXiv:2505.01196, 2025.
- Diksha Srivastava, J Divya, Appani Sudarshanam, M Praveen, U Mutheeswaran, and R Krishnamoorthy. Wireless sensor network and internet of things-based smart irrigation system for farming. In 2023 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT), pages 1246–1250. IEEE, 2023.
- N. Tantalaki, S. Souravlas, and M. Roumeliotis. Data-driven decision making in precision agriculture: The rise of big data in agricultural systems. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 20(4):344–380, 2019. [CrossRef]
- Harold M. Van Es and Joshua D. Woodard. Innovation in agriculture and food systems in the digital age. In Soumitra Dutta, Bruno Lanvin, and Sacha Wunsch-Vincent, editors, Global Innovation Index 2017: Innovation Feeding the World, pages 97–104. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), 2017. [CrossRef]
- L Vijayaraja, R Dhanasekar, Rupa Kesavan, D Tamizhmalar, R Premkumar, and N Saravanan. A cost effective agriculture system based on iot using sustainable energy. In 2022 6th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), pages 546–549. IEEE, 2022.
- Chien-Yao Wang, Alexey Bochkovskiy, and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao. Yolov7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 7464–7475, 2023.
- Lei Wang and Hao Jin. Mapping tree-level water stress in walnut orchards using multispectral uav imagery and random forest. Precision Agriculture, 24(4):765–781, 2023.
- Xiaoyang Zhou, Zhen Li, and Liang Zhao. A comprehensive overview of federated learning for next-generation smart agriculture: Current trends, challenges, and future directions. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(3):239–256, 2024.





| Region | Agricultural Water Use (%) | Water Stress Level | Projected Impact on Crop Yield by 2030 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Middle East & North Africa | 80–90% | Extremely High | ↓ 20–30% in cereal yields |
| South Asia | 90% | High | ↓ 10–20% in rice and wheat yields |
| Sub-Saharan Africa | 85% | Moderate to High | ↓ 5–15% in maize and sorghum yields |
| North America | 40% | Moderate | ↓ 5–10% in wheat and soybean yields |
| Europe | 30–40% | Low to Moderate | ↓ 5–10% in fruit and vegetable yields |
| Latin America | 70% | Moderate | ↓ 10–15% in maize and soybean yields |
| Protocol | Range (km) | Power Consumption | Cost | Application Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi (802.11) | 0.05–0.1 | High | Low | Short-range, high-data transmission; suitable for areas with infrastructure |
| GSM (2G/3G) | 2–5 | Medium to High | Medium | Widely available; works well in rural areas with mobile coverage |
| LoRa | 2–15 | Low | Low to Medium | Ideal for rural, remote areas with limited power and connectivity |
| Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) | 0.01–0.05 | Very Low | Low | Short-range, energy-efficient; suitable for small-scale systems |
| MQTT (Protocol) | Dependent on carrier | Very Low | Low | Lightweight; used with Wi-Fi, GSM, or LoRa for efficient message transfer |
| System | Components | Estimated Cost (USD) | Scalability |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIAS (Haziq et al., 2022) | ESP8266, soil moisture sensor, pH sensor, water pump | $46 | Small farms, experimental plots |
| Vijayaraja et al. (2022) | NodeMCU, solar panel, moisture sensors, Adafruit cloud | $55–70 | Scalable to medium farms with solar support |
| Senthil Vadivu et al. (2023) | GSM module, soil sensors, remote controller | $60 | Small to medium farms, remote regions |
| Chowdary et al. (2019) | NodeMCU, PIR, Bluetooth/Wi-Fi modules | $35–45 | Suitable for home gardens or small plots |
| Mhaned et al. (2022) | Raspberry Pi, solenoid valve, WSN, MQTT module | $70–90 | Medium-scale farms; modular expansion possible |
| Authors | Year | Technologies Used | Methodology | Key Results and Contributions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saleheen et al. | 2022 | NodeMCU, Adafruit IO, soil/air sensors | Real-time monitoring and dashboard data relay | 30–40% less manual irrigation; improved tracking |
| Srivastava et al. | 2023 | GSM, WSN, moisture sensors | Automated irrigation with GSM IoT nodes | 22% better water efficiency; reduced labor |
| Elgaali & Ismail | 2023 | Arduino Mega, DHT11, solenoids | Tomato irrigation automation | 27% higher yield; 35% water savings |
| Baskar et al. | 2022 | NodeMCU, LoRa, Blynk | Cloud-triggered irrigation from soil moisture | 50% water savings; 18% better crop health |
| Sampatrao | 2019 | GSM, Android app | Real-time manual override with app feedback | 32% water savings; reduced labor cost |
| Bakare | 2023 | BPN, nutrient sensors | ML trained on crop growth data | 15–25% more output; 20% lower disease rates |
| Alphonse et al. | 2023 | Decision tree, sensors | ML-based irrigation on humidity/temp | 92% accuracy; 35% more water-use efficiency |
| Alanya-Arango et al. | 2022 | Weather sensors, ML | Weather/soil modeling for irrigation timing | 28% fewer irrigations; quality maintained |
| Pierre et al. | 2023 | IoT, fuzzy logic, mobile UI | Energy-aware fuzzy irrigation control | 50% energy savings; 20% yield increase |
| Puig et al. | 2022 | FIWARE, edge, ET models | Irrigation via soil balance + ET forecast | 33% water saving in vineyards; no yield loss |
| Haziq et al. | 2022 | ESP8266, pH sensor | Fertility-moisture control system ($46) | 85% water savings; 23% biomass gain |
| Vijayaraja et al. | 2022 | NodeMCU, solar, Adafruit | Off-grid irrigation with smart drainage | 48% less power; remote reliability |
| Senthil Vadivu et al. | 2023 | GSM, remote sensors | GSM-linked real-time automation | 38% more yield; 50% less labor |
| Janani & Pavitra | 2019 | UWSNs, RO reuse | Coastal saline irrigation for salicornia | Promising reuse method; early stage |
| Kumar et al. | 2022 | MQTT, BLYNK, NodeMCU | Moisture-based pump control | 87% control accuracy; robust in fields |
| Study | Technology | Key Features | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patil et al. (2023) | Arduino Uno, relay module, pump | Soil moisture-based automation | 80% water waste reduction, lower energy costs |
| Malla et al. (2023) | Temperature/distance sensors, piezo actuator | Dual-purpose actuator, farmer alerts | Reduced water and energy waste |
| Mhaned et al. (2022) | Raspberry Pi, WSN, MQTT, fuzzy logic | IoT-based automation | Optimized water use, reduced manual intervention |
| Chowdary et al. (2019) | PIR, NodeMCU, Bluetooth/Wi-Fi | Low-power sleep modes | Reduced energy consumption |
| Iyer et al. (2020) | LoRa, cloud storage | Centralized data collection, automation | Efficient water use, scalable |
| Nagaraja and Kant (2019) | AWS data, evapotranspiration | No on-site weather stations | Precise irrigation, cost savings |
| Study | Initial Cost ($) | Water Savings (%) | Yield Increase (%) | ROI Estimate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazic et al. (2022) | 46 | 85 | 23 | High |
| Vijayaraja et al. (2022) | 100–150 | 48 | 20 | Moderate |
| Senthil Vadivu et al. (2023) | 200–300 | 40 | 38 | Moderate |
| Patil et al. (2023) | 50–100 | 80 | 15–25 | High |
| Layer | Technologies | Functions |
|---|---|---|
| Things | Sensors, actuators | Collects soil moisture, temperature; controls irrigation devices |
| Edge | Microcontrollers, gateways | Local data processing, real-time decision-making |
| Communication | LoRa, MQTT, Wi-Fi | Transmits data between devices and cloud |
| Cloud | Databases, analytics platforms | Stores data, performs analytics, provides user interfaces |
| Technology | Potential Impact | Challenges | Example Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edge Computing | Enables real-time decision-making; reduces latency and cloud dependency | High initial hardware complexity; limited processing power on edge devices | LoRa-based edge irrigation controllers (e.g., Puig et al., 2022) |
| Energy Harvesting | Supports autonomous operation in off-grid or rural areas | Efficiency and durability of energy systems under harsh conditions | Solar-powered NodeMCU systems (e.g., Vijayaraja et al., 2022) |
| AI-Driven Forecasting | Improves irrigation accuracy via predictive models; enhances crop yield | Requires large datasets and model interpretability | Decision tree and neural network systems (e.g., Alphonse et al., 2023; Bakare, 2023) |
| Flexible/Printed Sensors | Reduces sensor cost; enables deployment on diverse surfaces (e.g., leaves, soil) | Durability and accuracy under environmental stress | Early-stage research in plant-wearable moisture sensors |
| Blockchain for Data Integrity | Secures data sharing and traceability in precision farming ecosystems | Scalability, energy use, and technical complexity | Pilot projects in agricultural supply chains and IoT trust layers |
| Interoperable IoT Standards | Promotes integration with existing farm management platforms | Lack of unified standards; vendor lock-in risks | FIWARE-based frameworks enabling modular sensor integration |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).