Submitted:
14 August 2025
Posted:
15 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Principle
3. Experimental Design and Monitoring Plan
3.1. Typical Flexible Subgrade Structure Composition
3.2. Deployment Plan
- High-temperature conditions for ATB-25 upper and lower layers: The paving temperature of the ATB layer can reach 160–180°C, and traditional epoxy encapsulation is prone to failure due to thermal degradation. To ensure the stability of the sensor optical cable under high-temperature conditions, a high-temperature-resistant slot-cutting process is adopted: after the surface layer has cooled to a constructable temperature, a specialized slot-cutting device is used to excavate a rectangular slot measuring 4 cm (width) × 3 cm (depth). After laying the optical cable, the slot is filled and sealed with asphalt cold patch material.
- Granular Base Course and Cement-Treated Base to resist mechanical damage: The middle and lower layers are at risk of being crushed by the tracks of the paver during construction. Longitudinal cable laying can avoid equipment operation paths, while transverse laying requires enhanced protection. This involves excavating a protective trench with dimensions of 5 cm (width) × 4 cm (depth) using a pre-cut slot method, and then backfilling with cement mortar after cable laying to enhance mechanical resistance and stability.
- Subgrade:In the soil layer,trenches are dug and cables are laid. The trench dimensions are 10 cm (width) × 25 cm (depth).After laying the optical cable, the original soil is used to backfill the trench in layers and compacted to ensure the burial depth, positioning accuracy, and long-term stability.
3.3. System Configuration and Data Acquisition Plan
- Grating Array Sensing Network: This section constitutes the first sensing layer of the system, primarily composed of fiber optic grating strain sensing cables and temperature sensing cables deployed across various structural layers. By adopting weak reflectivity grating (WFBG) array technology, the system can deploy thousands of measurement points on a single fiber optic cable, meeting the real-time monitoring requirements for multi-layer, multi-dimensional, and multi-parameter monitoring of roadbed structures. The sensing network achieves high-density, long-term, and highly sensitive sampling of structural conditions, with strong resistance to electromagnetic interference and high temperature and humidity, demonstrating excellent engineering adaptability.
- Grating Signal Demodulation System: This module is the data collection hub of the entire system. It uses a high-speed spectral demodulator to convert the optical signals transmitted from the sensing network into raw electrical signals containing physical quantity information such as strain and temperature. The demodulation process supports wavelength division/time division multiplexing demodulation mechanisms and has high-frequency sampling capabilities to ensure distortion-free capture of the entire dynamic response process.
- Edge computing and data preprocessing: The demodulated raw electrical signals will undergo preliminary analysis and preprocessing by the edge computing server to extract key feature indicators, such as peak strain, strain frequency spectrum, and structural response curves. The edge server is deployed in a roadside machine room, supporting local rapid computation and data caching, effectively alleviating transmission pressure and improving response efficiency.
- Network transmission channel: The system uses a low-latency, high-reliability industrial communication network to transmit edge preprocessing results back to the upper-level high-speed cloud platform via 4G/5G, dedicated lines, or fiber optic links, ensuring data real-time and integrity, and constructing a structure-communication-computing integrated closed loop.
- Intelligent Analysis Software Platform: This module is deployed on a high-speed cloud platform and integrates a variety of intelligent functions, including structural condition sensing, dynamic response analysis, health assessment, early warning and prediction, and service life assessment. The platform enables functional modules such as “multi-layer strain field visualization,” “multi-time-period load-temperature coupling diagnosis,” and “zoned health risk warning,” and provides data support and decision-making basis for operational needs such as smart mobility, smart management, smart maintenance, and smart guidance.
3.4. Load Test Plan
3.4.1. Controlled Loading Tests Before Opening to Traffic
3.4.2. Actual Traffic Load Monitoring After Opening to Traffic
- Vehicle gross weight > 10 tons;
- Maximum tensile strain of graded crushed stone layer > 5 με
3.4.3. Actual Traffic Temperature Monitoring After Opening to Traffic
4. Experimental Results and Data Analysis
4.1. Strain Propagation Patterns in Roadbeds Under Dynamic Loads
4.2. Layered Characteristics of Structural Thermal Response to Temperature Gradients
- The layering pattern of the temperature field is distinct: temperature variations across layers exhibit consistency in long-term trends and seasonal fluctuations, but the amplitude of short-term daily temperature fluctuations decreases with increasing burial depth. Among these, the ATB layer, as a shallow structural layer, is most significantly influenced by external environmental factors (such as temperature fluctuations and solar radiation), exhibiting the most pronounced temperature fluctuations. Compared to the graded layer, the ATB layer exhibits a wider daily temperature variation range. For example, on June 10, its daily maximum temperature was significantly higher than that of the graded layer, while its daily minimum temperature was notably lower. This phenomenon clearly reflects the rapid response characteristic of the shallow structural layer to surface thermal conditions.
- Consistency at different mileage locations: The thermal response patterns at the 10 m and 30 m measurement points are highly consistent, indicating that the layered differences in the road temperature field can be regarded as a spatially uniform phenomenon, primarily dominated by burial depth and unrelated to the local location of the mileage points.
4.3. Verification of the Stability of Sensor Systems in Long-Term Service
5. Conclusion
- Grating array sensors feature convenient installation, high survival rate, and extended service life (the system has been in stable operation for over two years).
- Compared with electrical sensors, grating array sensors enable distributed full-field measurement of strain and temperature with high accuracy, providing reliable technical support for continuous monitoring of strain and temperature fields.
- Analysis of grating array monitoring data has revealed preliminary mechanisms governing highway subgrade structural responses to modulus variations, burial depth effects, temperature gradients, loading parameters, and vehicle speeds.
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- W.Chen,“Health monitoring of highway bridge structures based on non-destructive testing technology,”Transportation Technology and Management,4(12),1-3(2023).
- W.Hua, Lu. W.Hua, Lu.Yaobang, F.Guofeng, et al.,“Research and Application of Big Data Platform for Tunnel Structural Health Management,”tunnel construction43(8),1425-1437(2023).
- Z.Xiaoding,“Research on Health Monitoring Technology for Expressway Bridge Structures,”City Intelligence 20,199-201(2023).
- H.Min, L. H.Min, L.Panpan, Y.Gang, et al., “Decision Support System for Tunnel Operation and Maintenance Basedon BIM and Tunnel Whole Life Cycle Information,” Tunnel Construction 37(4), 394-400(2017).
- N.Qian, L. N.Qian, L.Yang, M.Huilin, “Mechanical Response and Applicable Layer Analysis of High Modulus Asphalt Pavement Structure,” Transportation Science & Technolgy 50(5),13-18(2024).
- C.Guangwei, M. C.Guangwei, M.Yonglei, Z.Dingyi, “Method for identifying the interlayer contact state of asphalt pavement based on FWD deflection basin parameters and durability assessment,” Science and Technology and Engineering 24(24), 10508-10519(2024).
- W.Runhua, Z. W.Runhua, Z.Haihu, “Mechanical Performance Analysis of Asphalt Pavements Considering Interlayer Contact Conditions,” Science and Technology and Engineering 22(25),11203-11211(2022).
- L.Ling, Z. L.Ling, Z.Yu, Z.Yongbo, “Estimation of asphalt pavement fatigue performance considering interlayer contact conditions,” Journal of Dalian University of Technology 61(3), 280-287(2021).
- L.Qun, L. L.Qun, L.Tingyu, C.Yuliang, “Study on the Influence of Interlayer Contact Condition on the Performance of Rigid-Flexible Composite Pavement Structures,” highway engineering 45(6), 181-184+206(2025).
- Z.Weitian, Y. Z.Weitian, Y.Qun, “Fatigue performance assessment of old cement concrete pavements based on three-dimensional ground-penetrating radar and drop hammer deflectometer,” Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science Edition) 5, 732-740 (2025).
- L.Zhichao, L. L.Zhichao, L.Huiwen, L.Tianci, et al., “Experimental Study on the Evaluation of Subgrade Modulus Using a Drop Weight Deflectometer,” Highway 70(3), 62-69(2025).
- L.Bo, G. L.Bo, G.Xiao, Z.Gui, et al., “High-temperature rheological and fatigue performance testing of recycled asphalt undergoing secondary aging,” Highway 69(12), 366-372(2024).
- Z.Jianping, L. Z.Jianping, L.Chuntao, T.Zhaoyang, “Research on the Application of Distributed Fiber Optic Strain Sensors for Monitoring Concrete Structure Strain in Tunnels,” Sichuan Architecture 44(6), 113-116(2024).
- J.Hongwei, “Structural health monitoring based on resistive strain gauges,” Heilongjiang Water Conservancy Science and Technology 40(08), 49-51(2012).
- Spencer, B.F., Jr.; Hoskere, V.; Narazaki, Y. Advances in Computer Vision-Based Civil Infrastructure Inspection and Monitoring. Engineering 2019, 5, 199–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yozo Fujino,Dionysius, M. Siringoringo,Yoshiki Ikeda,Tomonori Nagayama,Tsukasa Mizutani.High Performance Structures: Building Structures and Materials—Review Research and Implementations of Structural Monitoring for Bridges and Buildings in Japan[J].Engineering,(6),2019.
- H.Junbin, D. H.Junbin, D.Peng, T.Jinsong, “Progress in the Preparation, Demodulation, and Application of Weakly Reflective Fiber Bragg Grating Arrays,” Advances in Lasers and Optoelectronics 58(17),62-79(2021).
- W.Yu, L. W.Yu, L.Nian, Z.Yixuan, et al., “Research on grating array pipeline leak detection and localization methods based on delay estimation,” Optics& Optoelecteonic Techno;ogy 21(6), 44(2023).
- C,Jiahui, F.Haiwei, C.Miao, et al., “Temperature sensing demodulation system based on weak reflection fiber grating,” Optical communications research (03), 82-87(2025).
- J.Zhengze, H. J.Zhengze, H.Wenzhu, Z.Yuanjing, et al., “High-Spatial-Resolution High-Accuracy OFDR Distributed Sensors Based on Seamless fs-WFBG Array”[J].Photonics12(4), 352(2025).
- D.Langni, L. D.Langni, L.Yanbing, L.Hua, et al., “Performance of intelligent CFRP tendon based on long gauge FBG sensing technology,” Journal of Railway Science & Engineering 21(7), 2815-2826(2024).
- S.Yi, G. S.Yi, G.Jianfei, L.Chaozheng, et al., “Leakage Monitoring Model for Concrete Panel Rockfill Dams Based on Fiber Bragg Grating Sensing Technology,” Journal of Sensing Technology, 36(2),329-336(2023).
- G.Hongchan, Y. G.Hongchan, Y.Gaofei, H.Junbin, et al., “Preparation of weak reflection gratings in conventional optical fibers based on phase mask templates,” laser technology 46(2), 149-154(2022).
- K.Hanpeng, N. K.Hanpeng, N.Zhaojun, C.Xuefeng, et al., “OPGW pole tilt monitoring array based on weak reflection fiber optic grating,” Optical and Optoelectronic Technology 22(1), 46-51(2024).
- D.Wenfang, “Research on Fiber Optic Grating Demodulation System Based on Time-Division Wavelength-Division Multiplexing Technology,” MA.Eng Thesis,.Anhui University of Science and Technology(2023).
- B.Jilong, Z. B.Jilong, Z.Xianmin, C.Kangsheng, et al., “Research on FBG Sensor Network Technology,” optical communication technology 25(2), 84-89(2001).
- Y.Yingping, W. Y.Yingping, W.Guoqing, J.Zhentao, et al., “Structural displacement and strain field inversion method based on inverse finite element method,” Sensors and microsystems 43(7), 114-117(2024).













| Material Name | Design Modulus(MPa) | Pavement Thickness(cm) | Tensile Splitting Strength(MPa) | |
| 20℃ | 15℃ | |||
| AC-16C Modified Asphalt Concrete (Anti-skid Wearing Course) | 1300 | 1900 | 4.5 | 1.1 |
| AC-20C Medium-graded Modified Asphalt Concrete (Binder Course) | 1200 | 1800 | 5.5 | 1.0 |
| ATB-25 Dense Graded Asphalt Treated Base (Upper Base) | 1200 | 1400 | 16 | 0.8 |
| Graded Crushed Stone (Lower Base) | 400 | 18 | — | |
| 3% Cement Stabilized Gravel (Subbase) | 1000(Deflection Calculation) | 32 | 0.8 | |
| 2400(Tensile Stress Calculation) | ||||
| Earthwork Subgrade | 40.5 | — | — | |
| Structural Layer | Dominant Strain Type | Characteristic Value( με @10km/h) |
| ATB-25 | Compressive | -48.07 |
| Granular Base Course | Tensile | 80.50 |
| Cement-Treated Base | Compressive | -25.71 |
| Subgrade | Tensile | 87.45 |
| Structural Layer | Tensile Strain Reduction | Compressive Strain Reduction | Sensitivity Ranking | Similarity Coefficient |
| ATB-25 | 10.8% | 32.7% | 2 | 0.9654 |
| Granular Base Course | 27.9% | 44.6% | 1 | 0.9660 |
| Cement-Treated Base | 12.8% | 18.2% | 3 | 0.9815 |
| Subgrade | 14.8% | 11.3% | 4 | 0.9625 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).