Submitted:
09 August 2025
Posted:
11 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- Combinatorial Structure
- An NP-complete decision problem instance encodes discrete constraints.
- Topological Representation
- These constraints are deterministically woven into a braid whose closure’s Jones polynomial indicates triviality or complexity.
- Dynamical Signature
- The braid’s structure is derived from the orbital behavior of a point c under the Mandelbrot iteration, where dynamical stability is conjectured to signal problem solvability.
2. A Proposed Correspondence
2.1. The Partition Problem
2.2. Topological Triviality and the Unknot
2.3. Dynamical Stability and the Mandelbrot Set
3. The Dynamic Weaving Algorithm
3.1. The S to c Mapping Problem
3.2. Path Generation from Dynamics
3.3. The Weaving Algorithm
- A crossing position is determined by the angle (phase) of . The complex plane is divided into sectors, and the sector containing determines j.
-
A crossing direction (a braid generator or its inverse ) is determined by the change in magnitude from the previous step. An increasing magnitude corresponds to one direction, and a decreasing magnitude to the other.This deterministic process converts the dynamic path into a static braid word, a unique topological signature of the problem’s dynamics.
4. Experimental Verification
4.1. Results for a Solvable Instance
- The generated dynamic path was a simple, stable, fixed-point orbit.
- The weaving algorithm processed this stable path and produced an empty braid word.
- Subsequent analysis confirmed this represents the unknot, with a Jones Polynomial .
4.2. Results for an Unsolvable Instance
- The generated dynamic path was chaotic and escaped after 34 iterations.
- The weaver translated this chaotic path into a complex 33-operator braid word (e.g., ).
-
Analysis in SageMath of the braid’s closure computed the Jones Polynomial as:This is a highly non-trivial polynomial, confirming the braid represents a complex topological link.
5. Discussion and Conclusion
References
- S. Cook, “The complexity of theorem-proving procedures”, Proceedings of the Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1971, pp. 151–158. [CrossRef]
- R. M. Karp, “Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems”, Complexity of Computer Computations, 1972, pp. 85–103. [CrossRef]
- V. F. R. Jones, “A polynomial invariant for knots via von Neumann algebras”, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 12(1), 1985, pp. 103–111. [CrossRef]
- B. B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature, W. H. Freeman and Company, 1982.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 1996 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).