Submitted:
28 July 2025
Posted:
29 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Methods
3. Results
3.1. Geopolymer Stability
| Data from Integrity Tests | GP | GPSW1 | GPSW2 | GPSW3 | GPSW4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC (mS/m)-7D | 2.2 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 17.5 | 4.6 |
| IC (mS/m)-14D | 2.0 | 2.1 | 3.3 | 12.6 | 4.4 |
| IC (mS/m)-28D | 2.8 | 2.2 | 3.3 | 12.7 | 3.2 |
| pH-7D | 10.9 | 10.9 | 11.0 | 11.0 | 10.9 |
| pH-14D | 11.2 | 11.5 | 11.7 | 11.8 | 11.6 |
| pH-28D | 10.9 | 10.9 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 11.0 |
3.2. Thermal Behaviour and Thermal Stability
3.3. Mechanical Behavior
3.4. Leaching Test
3.5. Antimicrobial Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| MK | Metakaolin |
| GP | Geopolymer |
| SW | Solid Waste |
| SEM | Scanning Electron Microscopy |
| FT-IR | Fourier-Transform Infrared |
| TG/DTA | Thermogravimetry-differential thermal analysis |
| RT | Room Temperature |
| IC | Ionic Conductivity |
| IHD | Inhibition Halo Diameter |
References
- Arias, A.; Feijoo, G.; Moreira, M.T.; Tukker, A.; Cucurachi, S. Advancing Waste Valorization and End-of-Life Strategies in the Bioeconomy through Multi-Criteria Approaches and the Safe and Sustainable by Design Framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2025, 207, 114907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obah Edom Tawo; Martin Ifeanyi Mbamalu Advancing Waste Valorization Techniques for Sustainable Industrial Operations and Improved Environmental Safety. Int. J. Sci. Res. Arch. 2025, 14, 127–149. [CrossRef]
- Tejaswini, M.S.S.R.; Pathak, P.; Gupta, D.K. Sustainable Approach for Valorization of Solid Wastes as a Secondary Resource through Urban Mining. Journal of Environmental Management 2022, 319, 115727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Deventer, J.S.J.; Provis, J.L.; Duxson, P.; Brice, D.G. Chemical Research and Climate Change as Drivers in the Commercial Adoption of Alkali Activated Materials. Waste Biomass Valor 2010, 1, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elgarahy, A.M.; Maged, A.; Eloffy, M.G.; Zahran, M.; Kharbish, S.; Elwakeel, K.Z.; Bhatnagar, A. Geopolymers as Sustainable Eco-Friendly Materials: Classification, Synthesis Routes, and Applications in Wastewater Treatment. Separation and Purification Technology 2023, 324, 124631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jwaida, Z.; Dulaimi, A.; Mashaan, N.; Othuman Mydin, M.A. Geopolymers: The Green Alternative to Traditional Materials for Engineering Applications. Infrastructures 2023, 8, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, M.; Dana, K. Partial Replacement of Metakaolin with Red Ceramic Waste in Geopolymer. Ceramics International 2021, 47, 3473–3483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adesanya, E.; Perumal, P.; Luukkonen, T.; Yliniemi, J.; Ohenoja, K.; Kinnunen, P.; Illikainen, M. Opportunities to Improve Sustainability of Alkali-Activated Materials: A Review of Side-Stream Based Activators. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021, 286, 125558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiventerä, J.; Perumal, P.; Yliniemi, J.; Illikainen, M. Mine Tailings as a Raw Material in Alkali Activation: A Review. Int J Miner Metall Mater 2020, 27, 1009–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geisendorf, S.; Pietrulla, F. The Circular Economy and Circular Economic Concepts—a Literature Analysis and Redefinition. Thunderbird Intl Bus Rev 2018, 60, 771–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, N.B.; Middendorf, B. Geopolymers as an Alternative to Portland Cement: An Overview. Construction and Building Materials 2020, 237, 117455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sá Ribeiro, R.A.; Sá Ribeiro, M.G.; Kutyla, G.P.; Kriven, W.M. Amazonian Metakaolin Reactivity for Geopolymer Synthesis. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering 2019, 2019, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Provis, J.L. Alkali-Activated Materials. Cement and Concrete Research 2018, 114, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papa, E.; Minelli, M.; Marchioni, M.C.; Landi, E.; Miccio, F.; Natali Murri, A.; Benito, P.; Vaccari, A.; Medri, V. Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer – Zeolite NaA Composites as CO2 Adsorbents. Applied Clay Science 2023, 237, 106900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duxson, P. Geopolymer Precursor Design. In Geopolymers; Elsevier, 2009; pp. 37–49 ISBN 978-1-84569-449-4.
- Albidah, A.; Alghannam, M.; Abbas, H.; Almusallam, T.; Al-Salloum, Y. Characteristics of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer Concrete for Different Mix Design Parameters. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 2021, 10, 84–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalifa, A.Z.; Cizer, Ö.; Pontikes, Y.; Heath, A.; Patureau, P.; Bernal, S.A.; Marsh, A.T.M. Advances in Alkali-Activation of Clay Minerals. Cement and Concrete Research 2020, 132, 106050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Catauro, M.; Bollino, F.; Dell’Era, A.; Ciprioti, S.V. Pure Al2O3·2SiO2 Synthesized via a Sol-Gel Technique as a Raw Material to Replace Metakaolin: Chemical and Structural Characterization and Thermal Behavior. Ceramics International 2016, 42, 16303–16309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, L.; Zhao, Y.; Lv, G.; Duan, Y.; Liu, X.; Jiang, X. Improving Stabilization/Solidification of MSWI Fly Ash with Coal Gangue Based Geopolymer via Increasing Active Calcium Content. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 854, 158594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Oliveira, L.B.; De Azevedo, A.R.G.; Marvila, M.T.; Pereira, E.C.; Fediuk, R.; Vieira, C.M.F. Durability of Geopolymers with Industrial Waste. Case Studies in Construction Materials 2022, 16, e00839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dal Poggetto, G.; D’Angelo, A.; Blanco, I.; Piccolella, S.; Leonelli, C.; Catauro, M. FT-IR Study, Thermal Analysis, and Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of a MK-Geopolymer Mortar Using Glass Waste as Fine Aggregate. Polymers 2021, 13, 2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Angelo, A.; Vertuccio, L.; Leonelli, C.; Alzeer, M.I.M.; Catauro, M. Entrapment of Acridine Orange in Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer: A Feasibility Study. Polymers 2023, 15, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Viola, V.; D’Angelo, A.; Vertuccio, L.; Catauro, M. Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers Filled with Industrial Wastes: Improvement of Physicochemical Properties through Sustainable Waste Recycling. Polymers 2024, 16, 2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sgarlata, C.; Formia, A.; Siligardi, C.; Ferrari, F.; Leonelli, C. Mine Clay Washing Residues as a Source for Alkali-Activated Binders. Materials 2021, 15, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davidovits, J. Geopolymer: Chemistry & Applications; 5th ed.; Institut Géopolymère: Saint-Quentin, 2020; ISBN 978-2-9544531-1-8. [Google Scholar]
- Catauro, M.; Viola, V.; D’Amore, A. Mosses on Geopolymers: Preliminary Durability Study and Chemical Characterization of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers Filled with Wood Ash. Polymers 2023, 15, 1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabbah (France, Chairman), R. ; Xu-wu (China), A.; Chickos (Usa), J.S.; Leitão (Portugal), M.L.P.; Roux (Spain), M.V.; Torres (México), L.A. Reference Materials for Calorimetry and Differential Thermal Analysis. Thermochimica Acta 1999, 331, 93–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ente Nazionale di Unificazione EN 12457-2:2004; 2004; p. 27;
- Hudzicki, J. Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Test Protocol 2009.
- Sikora, A.; Zahra, F. Nosocomial Infections. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island (FL), 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Feng, J. Preparation and Properties of Alkali Activated Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer. Materials 2016, 9, 767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duxson, P.; Lukey, G.C.; Van Deventer, J.S.J. Evolution of Gel Structure during Thermal Processing of Na-Geopolymer Gels. Langmuir 2006, 22, 8750–8757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamath, M.; Prashant, S.; Ralegaonkar, R. Microstructure Properties of Popular Alkali-Activated Pastes Cured in Ambient Temperature. Buildings 2023, 13, 858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silverstein, R.M.; Webster, F.X.; Kiemle, D.J.; Bryce, D.L. Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds; Eighth edition.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2015; ISBN 978-0-470-61637-6. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, S.; Aswath, M.U.; Das Biswas, R.; Ranganath, R.V.; Choudhary, H.K.; Kumar, R.; Sahoo, B. Role of Iron in the Enhanced Reactivity of Pulverized Red Mud: Analysis by Mössbauer Spectroscopy and FTIR Spectroscopy. Case Studies in Construction Materials 2019, 11, e00266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inaty, F.E.; Nasreddine, H.; Djerbi, A.; Gautron, L.; Marchetti, M.; Quiertant, M.; Metalssi, O.O. Mechanical and Durability Performance of Metakaolin and Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers Compared to Cement Systems. Results in Engineering 2025, 27, 105788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rihan, M.A.M.; Onchiri, R.O.; Gathimba, N.; Sabuni, B. Assessing the Durability Performance of Geopolymer Concrete Utilizing Fly Ash and Sugarcane Bagasse Ash as Sustainable Binders. Open Ceramics 2024, 20, 100687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simão, L.; Fernandes, E.; Hotza, D.; Ribeiro, M.J.; Montedo, O.R.K.; Raupp-Pereira, F. Controlling Efflorescence in Geopolymers: A New Approach. Case Studies in Construction Materials 2021, 15, e00740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Longhi, M.A.; Zhang, Z.; Walkley, B.; Rodríguez, E.D.; Kirchheim, A.P. Strategies for Control and Mitigation of Efflorescence in Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers. Cement and Concrete Research 2021, 144, 106431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tesovnik, A.; Horvat, B. Rapid Immobilisation of Chemical Reactions in Alkali-Activated Materials Using Solely Microwave Irradiation. Minerals 2024, 14, 1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Genua, F.; Giovini, M.; Santoni, E.; Berrettoni, M.; Lancellotti, I.; Leonelli, C. Factors Affecting Consolidation in Geopolymers for Stabilization of Galvanic Sludge. Materials 2025, 18, 3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aly, Z.; Vance, E.R.; Perera, D.S.; Hanna, J.V.; Griffith, C.S.; Davis, J.; Durce, D. Aqueous Leachability of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers with Molar Ratios of Si/Al = 1.5–4. Journal of Nuclear Materials 2008, 378, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Callister, W.D. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction; Seventh edition.; Wiley: New York, NY, 2007; ISBN 978-0-471-73696-7. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, M. Differential Scanning Calorimetry — An Introduction for Practitioners: G. Höhne, W. Hemminger and H.-J. Flammersheim, Springer — Verlag, Berlin, 1996 (ISBN: 3-340-59012-9). 222 Pages, 136 Figures and 13 Tables. Price: DM 178,000 (Hardback). Thermochimica Acta 1997, 303, 117–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duxson, P.; Provis, J.L.; Lukey, G.C.; Mallicoat, S.W.; Kriven, W.M.; Van Deventer, J.S.J. Understanding the Relationship between Geopolymer Composition, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2005, 269, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castillo, H.; Collado, H.; Droguett, T.; Sánchez, S.; Vesely, M.; Garrido, P.; Palma, S. Factors Affecting the Compressive Strength of Geopolymers: A Review. Minerals 2021, 11, 1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, R.; Iqbal, S.; Soliyeva, M.; Ali, A.; Elboughdiri, N. Advanced Clay-Based Geopolymer: Influence of Structural and Material Parameters on Its Performance and Applications. RSC Adv. 2025, 15, 12443–12471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weckwerth, P.H.; Zapata, R.O.; Vivan, R.R.; Tanomaru Filho, M.; Maliza, A.G.A.; Duarte, M.A.H. In Vitro Alkaline pH Resistance of Enterococcus Faecalis. Braz. Dent. J. 2013, 24, 474–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padan, E.; Bibi, E.; Ito, M.; Krulwich, T.A. Alkaline pH Homeostasis in Bacteria: New Insights. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes 2005, 1717, 67–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adhikary, S.K.; D’Angelo, A.; Viola, V.; Catauro, M.; Perumal, P. Alternative Construction Materials from Industrial Side Streams: Are They Safe? Energ. Ecol. Environ. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Angelo, A.; Viola, V.; Fiorentino, M.; Dal Poggetto, G.; Blanco, I. Use of Natural Dyes to Color Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer Materials. Ceramics International 2024, S0272884224019692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| Type of Waste | Suction dust | Red mud a | Electro-filter dust | Extraction sludge b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample label | SW1 | SW2 | SW3 | SW4 |
| European waste catalogue (EWC) | 06 04 05 | 11 01 09 | 19 01 05 | 16 03 06 |
| Characteristics | Powdery, grey-black color | Powdery, grey-green color | Powdery, white color | Grainy, beige color |
| Residue (%) at 105 °C | 99.1±0.8 | 58.3±2.0 | 98.6±2.5 | 65.0±3.7 |
| pH | 7.2 | 3.0 | 11.2 | 7.1 |
| Chlorides (mg/L) | < 5 | 25678 | 25980 | - |
| Sulphides (mg/L) | < 5 | 64.4 | 16510 | - |
| Fluorides (mg/L) | < 5 | 0.35 | 3900 | - |
| Nitrates (mg/L) | < 5 | 17.5 | - | - |
| Phosphates (mg/L) | < 5 | - | - | - |
| Cyanides (mg/L) | - | < 50 | - | - |
| Hydrocarbons (mg/L) | < 100 | C10-C40 < 2.5 C5-C8 = 294 |
C10-C40 < 18 C5-C8 < 1 |
C10-C40 < 100 |
| Metal content (mg/kg) | As = 870 Sb = 145265 Ca = 369 Fe = 219 Ni = 23 Pb = 228 K = 171 Sn = 257741 Zn = 60 |
Al = 114 Cr = 130 Fe = 371 Mn = 371 Ni = 176 Pb = 25 Cu = 52 Zn = 25426 |
As < 2.3 Cd < 2.3 Co = 1.35 Cr = 15.5 Mn = 15.5 Mn = 2.7 Mg = 43.2 Ni = 7.43 Pb = 21.5 Cu = 25.7 Sn = 7.4 Tl = 0.676 V = 1.35 Zn = 7.43 |
Sb < 10 As < 5 Cd < 0.6 Cr < 10 Mn = 22 Mg < 0.5 Ni = 2 Pb < 5 Cu < 5 Se < 100 V < 5 Zn = 25 |
| Geopolymer name | Mass/g | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na2SiO3 | NaOH | MK | SW1 | SW2 | SW3 | SW4 | |
| GP0 | 145.63 | 13.31 | 100.00 | - | - | - | - |
| GPSW1 | 116.50 | 10.65 | 80.00 | 20.00 | - | - | - |
| GPSW2 | 116.50 | 10.65 | 80.00 | - | 20.00 | - | - |
| GPSW3 | 116.50 | 10.65 | 80.00 | - | - | 20.00 | - |
| GPSW4 | 116.50 | 10.65 | 80.00 | - | - | - | 20.00 |
| Sample | 7D | 28D | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trange/°C | Mass/% | Trange/°C | Mass/% | |
| GP | 14 – 275 | 19.9 | 16 – 277 | 21.0 |
| GPSW1 | 11 – 258 | 16.9 | 12 – 290 | 16.6 |
| GPSW2 | 32 – 263 | 18.4 | 20 – 253 | 16.3 |
| GPSW3 | 27 – 283 | 25.1 | 19 – 276 | 23.3 |
| GPSW4 | 12 – 285 | 20.0 | 24 – 278 | 17.5 |
| Parameter | Cr | Ni | Cu | Zn | As | Cd | Pb | Ba | Mo | Sb | Se |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inert | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.05 | 0.004 | 0.05 | 2.00 | 0.05 | 0.006 | 0.01 |
| Non-Hazardous | 1.00 | 1.00 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.20 | 0.100 | 1.00 | 10.0 | 1.00 | 0.070 | 0.05 |
| Hazardous | 7.00 | 4.00 | 10.0 | 20.0 | 2.50 | 0.500 | 5.00 | 30.0 | 3.00 | 0.500 | 0.70 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).