Submitted:
26 July 2025
Posted:
28 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Procedure
2.2. Sample
2.3. Methods
- ‒ the technique of variational cardiointervalometry ("VCM") on the UPFT-1/30- "Psychophysiologist" device [29], which allows determining the level of one’s functional state by analyzing 128 cardiocycles (ECG signal, the time of RR intervals and their standard deviation are recorded).
- ‒ methods for assessing the characteristics of the cardiovascular system using the AngioCode mobile health tracker (ZMT LLC, Izhevsk, Russia) [30]. This device is included in the program for assessing the functional state of workers due to its active use at various enterprises by psychological services and labor protection services of industrial enterprises.
- ‒ "State Scale" by E. Grol, M. Heider, adapted by A. B. Leonova. The test consists of 40 questions; the answers of the subjects are assessed using four-point scales (where 1 is "almost never", and 4 is "almost always"), identifying four levels of severity of symptoms of the following mental states: monotony, mental satiety, tension/stress, fatigue [32,33,34].
- ‒ the brief eight-color test of M. Luscher [35], using the interpretation coefficients developed by G.A. Aminev [36]; All coefficients were calculated using the corresponding formulas reflecting a particular combination of colors. A more detailed description of each parameter and its calculation based on the colors choice by the respondent is presented in our previous work [24]. M. Luscher assessed high performance using green, red and yellow colors, which stand next to each other at the beginning of the row. This parameter is reflected in Aminev’s performance coefficient, varying from 9.1 to 20.9. According to M. Luscher’s theory, stress indicators are the presence of primary active colors in the last positions of the subjects’ choice and the presence of brown, black and gray cards in the first places of the row. The parameter varies from 0 to 41.8. The vegetative balance is calculated by correlating the red and yellow colors with blue and green at the beginning or end of the row and reflects the relationship between the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system, that is, between the activating and inhibitory processes in the body. The personal balance is calculated based on the ratio of violet and brown with green and blue at the beginning and end of the row and reflects the relationship between internal (subjective) and external (objective) factors in human behavior. It shows how much a person is focused on their own experiences or on external circumstances. Heteronomy shows how much a person is influenced by the external environment, social norms or other people’s opinions. Aminev’s interpretation coefficients have been repeatedly used in empirical studies and correlate well with other parameters of human functional states [8,24].

2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Social-Psychological Characteristics of Teams of Two Divisions at the Beginning, Middle and End of the Shift Period
| Parameter, methodology |
Beginning of shift period | Middle of shift period | End of shift period | ||||||
| К | Ya | p | К | Ya | p | К | Ya | p | |
| Group motivation, V.A. Rozanova | 142.8; 22.00 | 126.5; 21.86 | 0.057 | 139.3; 22.49 | 124.2; 18.89 | 0.047 | 135.3; 26.37 | 124.7; 17.98 | 0.204 |
| Group cohesion, K.E. Seashore | 14.9; 1.78 | 13.9; 2.45 | 0.026 | 14.3; 1.96 | 14.16; 2.39 | 0.947 | 15.0; 1.80 | 14.0; 1.86 | 0.001 |
| Psychological atmosphere, F. Fiedler | 17.7; 10.98 | 25.3; 10.38 | 0.001 | 17.9; 7.03 | 24.5; 9.7 | 0.001 | 19.4; 5.62 | 27.2; 7.91 | 0.001 |
3.2. Peculiarities of Professional Stress in Loggers of Two Divisions at the Beginning, Middle and End of the Shift Period
| Condition parameter, methodology |
Beginning of shift period (M; SD) | Middle of shift period (M; SD) | End of shift period (M; SD) | ||||||
| К N=63 |
Ya N=98 |
p | К N=79 |
Ya N=115 |
p | К N=61 |
Ya N=103 |
p | |
| Stress level* | 175.9; 269.19 | 180.9; 147.74 | 0.05 | 200.7; 238.01 | 165.2; 194.79 | 0.011 | 159.5; 200.24 | 111.2; 126.27 | 0.016 |
| Systolic pressure** | 131.9; 17.00 | 137;1 7.56 | - | 127.6; 13.97 | 136.1; 17.71 | 0.001 | 127.4; 14.07 | 129.7; 15.97 | - |
| Quasa endurance coefficient** | 16.2; 4.51 | 14.5; 3.97 | 0.018 | 17.0; 4.52 | 14.9; 4.53 | 0.001 | 17.1; 4.61 | 15.3; 4.61 | 0.008 |
| Adaptive potential** | 2.8; 0.46 | 3.1; 0.35 | 0.001 | 2.7; 0.41 | 3.1; 0.36 | 0.001 | 2.7; 0.43 | 3.0; 0.37 | 0.001 |
| Physical condition index** | 0.5; 0.20 | 0.6; 0.14 | 0.001 | 0.5; 0.18 | 0.6; 0.15 | 0.001 | 0.5; 0.21 | 0.7; 0.17 | 0.001 |
| Speed*** | 4.3; 1.09 | 3.3; 0.98 | 0.001 | 4.4; 1.08 | 3.3; 1.09 | - | 4.6; 0.99 | 3.5; 0.97 | 0.001 |
| Operator performance*** | 3.3; 1.44 | 2.5; 0.95 | 0.001 | 3.5; 1.65 | 2.8; 0.89 | 0.003 | 3.8; 1.63 | 2.8; 0.88 | 0.001 |
| Functional capacity level **** | 5.2; 1.7 | 3.7; 1.3 | 0.001 | 5.5; 1.5 | 3.5; 1.26 | 0.001 | 5.0; 1.75 | 3.7; 1.46 | 0.001 |
| Functional condition level **** | 3.2; 1.33 | 4.2; 1.22 | 0.001 | 3.4; 1.23 | 4.0; 1.19 | 0.003 | 3.4; 1.07 | 4.3; 1.49 | 0.001 |
| Condition parameter, methodology |
Beginning of shift period (M; SD) | Middle of shift period (M; SD) | End of shift period (M; SD) | ||||||
| К N=63 |
Ya N=98 |
p | К N=63 |
Ya N=98 |
p | К N=63 |
Ya N=98 |
p | |
| Psychological parameters of stress and working capacity | |||||||||
| Vegetative balance* | 4.8; 4.32 | 5.8; 3.75 | - | 3.8; 5.12 | 5.3; 3.87 | - | 2.9; 5.28 | 6.1; 3.22 | 0.001 |
| Subjective comfort** | 53.8; 8.88 | 52.8; 8.55 | - | 54.7; 8.68 | 53.4; 9.7 | - | 55.7; 9.02 | 51.8; 9.95 | 0.03 |
| Fatigue*** | 16.9; 3.86 | 15.3; 2.62 | 0.004 | 17; 3.67 | 15.6; 3.5 | 0.005 | 17.2; 3.71 | 16.6; 3.71 | - |
| Monotony*** | 17.9; 2.35 | 17.1; 2.38 | 0.046 | 18.3; 2.76 | 18.1; 2.53 | - | 18.1; 2.89 | 18.7; 2.48 | - |
| Satiety*** | 18.9; 4.2 | 17; 3.38 | 0.004 | 18.2; 4.36 | 17.8; 3.52 | - | 19.8; 4.85 | 18.3; 4.64 | - |
| Stress*** | 17.8; 3.6 | 18.6; 3.42 | - | 17.5; 3.07 | 18; 2.73 | - | 17.7; 3.24 | 19.7; 2.42 | 0.001 |
| Depression**** | 1.1; 1.69 | 2.4; 2.18 | 0.001 | 0.3; 0.79 | 2.3; 2.29 | 0.001 | 0.2; 0.52 | 2.4; 2.71 | 0.001 |
| Anxiety**** | 1.7; 3.07 | 1.8; 1.82 | 0.05 | 0.4; 1.04 | 1.7; 1.67 | 0.001 | 0.2; 0.64 | 1.9; 1.7 | 0.001 |
| Stress**** | 2.1; 3.11 | 3.9; 2.66 | 0.001 | 1.2; 1.81 | 3.8; 2.97 | 0.001 | 0.6; 1.59 | 4.2; 3.18 | 0.001 |
| Labor productivity | |||||||||
| Volume of timber per shift | 144.2; 52.92 | 144.9; 38.75 | - | 97.7; 52.23 | 174.9; 48.87 | 0.001 | 145.5; 37.4 | 195.7; 60 | 0.003 |
3.3. The Relationship Between Psychophysiological and Psychological Parameters of Professional Stress in Loggers in the Far North at the Beginning, Middle and End of the Shift Period



4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pecyna, A.; Buczaj, A.; Lachowski, S.; Choina, P. Occupational hazards in opinions of forestry employees in Poland. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2019, 26, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fonseca, A.; Aghazadeh, F.; de Hoop, C.; Ikuma, L.; Al-Qaisi, S. Effect of noise emitted by forestry equipment on workers’ hearing capacity. Int J Ind Ergon. 2015, 46, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poje, A.; Spinelli, R.; Magagnotti, N.; Mihelic, M. Exposure to noise in wood chipping operations under the conditions of agro-forestry. Int J Ind Ergon. 2015, 50, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naskrent, B.; Grzywiński, W.; Polowy, K.; Tomczak, A.; Jelonek, T. Eye-Tracking in Assessment of the Mental Workload of Harvester Operators. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jankovský, M.; Messingerová, V.; Ferenčík, M.; Allman, M. Objective and subjective assessment of selected factors of the work environment of forest harvesters and forwarders. J. For. Sci. 2016, 62, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masci, F.; Spatari, G.; Bortolotti, S.; Giorgianni, C.M.; Antonangeli, L.M.; Rosecrance, J.; Colosio, C. Assessing the Impact of Work Activities on the Physiological Load in a Sample of Loggers in Sicily (Italy). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choina, P.; Solecki, L.; Goździewska, M.; Buczaj. A. Assessment of musculoskeletal system pain complaints reported by forestry workers. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2018, 25(2), 338–344. [CrossRef]
- Korneeva, Y.; Shadrina, N.; Simonova, N.; Trofimova, A. Job stress, working capacity, professional performance and safety of shift workers at forest harvesting in the North of Russian Federation. Forests 2024, 15, 2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monsey, L. M.; Harrington, M.; Clonch, A.; Spector, J.; Vignola, E. F.; Baker, M.G. Exploring barriers and facilitators to well-being among logging industry workers: a mixed methods study. International Journal of Forest Engineering 2025, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lotfalian, M.; Emadian, S.F.; Riahi, F.N.; Salimi, M.; Sheikhmoonesi, F. EPA-0056 - Occupational Stress Impact on Mental Health Status of Forest Workers. European Psychiatry 2014, 29(S1), 1–1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Postolache, R.-G.; Timofte, A.I. Considerations on the health status of loggers in summer and winter working conditions. Annals of the University of Oradea, Fascicle: Environmental Protection 2024, 2, 105–108. [Google Scholar]
- Škvor, P.; Jankovský, M.; Natov, P.; Dvořák, J. Evaluation of stress loading for logging truck drivers by monitoring changes in muscle tension during a work shift. Silva Fennica 2023, 57, 1, 10709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wasmund, W.L.; Westrholm, E.C.; Watenpaugh, D.E.; Wasmund, S.L.; Smith, M.L. Interactive effects of mental and physical stress on cardiovascular control. J Appl Physiol 2002, 92, 1828–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuzewicz, K.; Roman-Liu, D.; Konarska, M.; Bartuzi, P.; Matusiak, K.; Korczak, D.; Guzek, M. Heart rate variability (HRV) and muscular system activity (EMG) in cases of crash threat during simulated driving of a passenger car. Int J Occup Med Env. 2013, 26, 710–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jodłowski, K.; Kalinowski, M. Current Possibilities of Mechanized Logging in Mountain Areas. Forest Research Papers 2018, 79, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spinelli, R.; Magagnotti, N.; Labelle, E.R. The Effect of New Silvicultural Trends on Mental Workload of Harvester Operators. Croatian journal of forest engineering 2020, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Driskell, J.E.; Driskell, T.; & Salas, E. Teams in Extreme Environments: Alterations in Team Development and Team Functioning In: Team Dynamics Over Time (Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 18). Editors: E. Salas, W.B. Vessey, A.X. Estrada. Publisher: Emerald Publishing, 2017 Pages: 161-185. [CrossRef]
- Bishop, SL. Team dynamics analysis of the Huautla cave diving expedition: a case study. Journal of Human Performance in Extreme Environments 1998, 3, 37–41. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, O. Monitoring changes in cohesion over time in expedition teams; the role of daily events and team composition. 14th International Naturalistic Decision-Making Conference At: San Francisco, USA, 2019; Mode of access : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341407404_Monitoring_changes_in_cohesion_over_time_in_expedition_teams_the_role_of_daily_events_and_team_composition, free access (10.03.2025). [Google Scholar]
- Palinkas, L.A. & Suedfeld, P. Psychological effects of polar expeditions. The Lancet 2008, 371(9607), 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stuster, J. Behavioral Issues Associated with Isolation and Confinement: Review and Analysis of Astronaut Journals. NASA Technical Report (NASA/TM-2011-216146)* Publisher: NASA Ames Research Center, 2011, Pages: 1-192 URL: https://ntrs.nasa. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leon, G.R.; Kanfer, R.; Hoffman, R.G.; Dupre, L. Group processes and task effectiveness in a Soviet-American expedition team. Environment and Behavior 1994, 26(2), 149–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korneeva, Ya.A.; Simonova, N.N.; Korneeva, A.V.; Trofimova, A.A. Functional states of workers in the logging industry in the Far North during the shift period. Acta Biomedica Scientifica 2022, 7(4), 138–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korneeva, Y.; Simonova, N. Job stress and working capacity among fly-in-fly-out workers in the oil and gas extraction industries in the Arctic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parkes, K.R. Psychosocial aspects of work and health in the north. sea oil and gas industry: summaries of reports published 1996–2001. Norwich, UK Health Safety Executive: 2002, 98.
- Gent, V.M. The impacts of fly-in/fly-out work on well-being and work-life satisfaction. master’s thesis, school of psychology. Perth, Australia: Murdoch University, 2004.
- Gallegos, D. Fly-In Fly-Out Employment: Managing the Parenting Transitions. Summary and Key Findings. Perth, Australia: Ngala & Meerilinga, 2006.
- Clifford, S. The Effects of Fly-In/Fly-Out Commute Arrangements and Extended Working Hours on the Stress, Lifestyle, Relationship and Health Characteristics of Western Australian Mining Employees and their Partners: Report of Research Findings. Master’s Thesis, . Crawley, Australia: School of Anatomy and Human Biology, The University of Western Australia, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- NPKF “Medicom MTD”. Methodological Guide A_2556-05_MS. Psychophysiological Testing Device UPFT-1/30—"Psychophysiologist”; NPKF “Medicom MTD”: Taganrog, Russia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Health tracker AngioCode-301. User manual. [Electronic resource] https://angiocode.ru/files/RU/AngioCodePersonal/SFX/AC-301_Device_Manual.pdf.
- Gliko, L.I.; Reshetnev, V.G.; Reshetneva, E.M. Mathematical method for assessing individual indicators of human hemodynamics. Series: Diagnostic hemodynamics. Issue 3. Clinical diagnostic criteria of the mathematical method. St. Petersburg, Russia: 1 Central Research Institute of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, 1996; 20.
- Leonova, A. B.; Kapitsa, M. S. Methods for assessing mental performance and functional states. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology 1998, 2. [Google Scholar]
- Bullinger, M.; Morfeld, M.; Hoppe-Tarnowski, D. POMS. Profile of Mood States. In: Schumacher J, Klaiberg A, Braehler E (Hrsg) Diagnostische Verfahren zu Lebensqualität und Wohlbefinden. Hogrefe, Göttingen, 2003, 262–264.
- Zerssen, von D.; Koeller, D.M. Die Befindlichkeits-Skala. Parallelformen Bf-S und Bf-SI aus: Klinische Selbstbeurteilungs-Skalen (Ksb-S) aus dem Münchener Psychiatrischen Informations-System (PSYCHIS München). Beltz, Weinheim. 1976.
- Luscher, M. The Luscher Colour Test; Sydney, L., Ed.; Pocket Books: New York, NY, USA. 1983.
- Aminev, G.A. Mathematical Methods in Engineering Psychology; Bashkir State University: Ufa, Russia, 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Leonova, A.B.; Velichkovskaya, S.B. Differential diagnostics of states of reduced performance. In Psychology of Mental States: Dedicated to the 200th Anniversary of Kazan University; Center for Innovation Technologies: Kazan, Russia, 2002; pp. 326–343. [Google Scholar]
- Plath, H.; Richter, P. Ermüdung, Monotonie, Sättigung, Stress: Verfahren zur skalierten Erfassung erlebter Beanspruchungsfolgen; BMS Psychodiagnostisches Zentrum: Berlin, Germany, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Lovibond, P.F.; Lovibond, S.H. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1995, 33, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lovibond, S.H. , & Lovibond, P.F. Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia. 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Ruzhenkova, V. V.; Ruzhenkov, V. A.; Khamskaya, I. S. Russian-language adaptation of the DASS-21 test for screening diagnostics of depression, anxiety and stress. Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery 2019, 10, 39–46. [Google Scholar]
- Zolotareva, A.A. Psychometric assessment of the russian-language version of the depression, anxiety, and stress scale (DASS-21). Psychological journal 2021, 42, 5, 80–88. [Google Scholar]
- Seashore, S.E. Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group. Ann Arbor (USA): University of Michigan, 1954.
- Dontsov, A.I. Psychology of the collective. Moscow: Publishing house of Moscow University, 1984.
- Fiedler, F. E. A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
- Fiedler, F. E. The contingency model and the dynamics of the leadership process. University Of Washington, Seattle. Washington, 1978.
- Khanin, Yu.L. Psychology of Communication in Sports. Moscow: Physical Education and Sport. 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Rozanova, V. A. Psychology of Management: a tutorial. Moscow: Alfa-Press Publishing House, 2007.
- Mikhalyuk, O. S.; Shalyto, A. Yu. Social and psychological climate of the team and personality. Psychological problems of social regulation of behavior, Moscow: Science. 1976; 300–312. [Google Scholar]
- Hjortskov, N.; Garde, A.H.; Ørbæk, P.; Hansen, A.M. Evaluation of salivary cortisol as a biomarker of self-reported mental stress in field studies. Stress Health 2004, 20, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Passicot, P.; Murphy, G.E. Effect of work schedule design on productivity of mechanised harvesting operations in Chile. N. Z. J. For. Sci. 2013, 43, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lagerstrom, E.; Magzamen, S.; Rosecrance, J. A mixed-methods analysis of logging injuries in Montana and Idaho. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2017, 60, 1077–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Eck, M.; Berkhof, H.; Nicolson, N.; Sulon, J. The effects of perceived stress, traits, mood states, and stressful daily events on salivary cortisol. Psychosom. Med. 1996, 58, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pruessner, J.C.; Hellhammer, D.H.; Kirschbaum, C. Burnout, perceived stress, and cortisol responses to awakening. Psychosom. Med. 1999, 61, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frankenhaeuser, M. A Psychobiological Framework for Research on Human Stress and Coping. In Dynamics of Stress; Appley, M.H., Trumbull, R., Eds.; New York, NY, USA: Plenum, 1986; pp. 101–106. [Google Scholar]
- Kymalainen, H.; Laitila, J.; Väätäinen, K.; Malinen, J. Workability and well-being at work among cut-to-length forest machine operators. Croatian journal of forest engineering, 2021, 42. [CrossRef]
- Kjærgaard, A.; Leon, G. R.; Fink, B.A. Personal challenges, communication processes, and team effectiveness in military special patrol teams operating in a polar environment. Environment and Behavior 2015, 47(6), 644–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shchurov, A. G.; Lobzha, M. T.; Koshkarev, P. V.; Tikhonov, S. Yu. Formation of cohesion of the crew of a surface ship as one of the specific tasks of physical training. Psychological, pedagogical and medical-biological support of physical education and sports 2020, 4, 183–186. [Google Scholar]
- Lebedev, V. I. Psychology and psychopathology of loneliness and group isolation: a textbook for students of the psychological faculties of medical and humanitarian institutes, cadets of transport schools, Unity-Dana: Moscow, 2002.
- Sharipov, D. K. Adaptation of the human body in conditions of aggressively low temperature and isolated environment of Antarctica. Bulletin of KazNMU 2017, 1. Access mode: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/adaptatsiya-chelovecheskogo-organizma-v-usloviyah-agressivno-nizkoy-temperatury-i-izolirovannoy-sredy-antarktidy.

| v. Karpogory | s. Yasny | |
| Number of participants | 20 | 27 |
| Age (average age) | 26 - 59 years (38,26±9,350) | 27 - 60 years (44,85±9,607) |
| Experience in shift work (average length of service) | 1,5 - 25 years (8, 26±6,701), |
0,1 - 36 years (10,20±9,527) |
| Experience in position (average length of service) | 0,1 - 18 years (5,40±4,765). | 0,1 - 38 years (10,77±12,166) |
| Education level | 25% general secondary 60% secondary vocational 15% higher |
45% - general secondary, 35% - secondary vocational, 20% - higher education |
| Positions | 65% forestry machine operators (harvester, forwarder) 15% drivers 10% motor grader and excavator operators 10% maintenance specialists (welders, general workers) |
37.04% - forestry machine operators (harvester, forwarder); 33.33% - drivers; 11.11% - machine operators (motor grader, excavator); 14.82% - maintenance specialists; 3.70% - foremen |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).