Submitted:
25 July 2025
Posted:
28 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Relevance of the Topic and Research Motivation
1.2. Historical Development, Current State and Future Trends
1.3. Global Issues of the Sustainable Development of Cybersecurity of Infocommunicanion Networks
1.4. Main Aim, Objectives and Approaches to the Research
2. Methodology
2.1. Information Sources and Search Strategy
2.2. Data Items
3. Technical and Functional Features of the Studied Infocommunication Technologies
3.1. Distinctive Features of Mobile Communication
3.2. Distinctive Features of Satellite Communication
3.3. Classification of Cyberthreats
4. Classification and Characterisation of Cyberthreats at the Architectural Levels of Information and Communication Systems
4.1. Threats at the Physical Level
4.2.‘Man-in-the-Middle’ in Radio Channels
4.3. DDoS and Jamming Cyberthreats
4.4. Cyberthreats in Cryptographic Protocols and Authentication
4.5. Problems of Symmetric and Asymmetric Cryptography
4.6. Quantum Challenges and Post-Quantum Cryptography
5. Evaluation of Existing Research Results
5.1. Systematic Analysis of the Results of Scientific and Applied Research
5.2. Current Trends in Cyberattacks
5.3. Identify Research Gaps in Existing Approaches
6. Discussions and Suggestions for Future Research
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- IATA: IATA Releases 2024 Safety Report. Available online: https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2025-releases/2025-02-26-01/ (accessed on 02 July 2025).
- IATA: EASA and IATA Publish Comprehensive Plan to Mitigate the Risks of GNSS Interference. Available online: https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2025-releases/2025-06-18-01/ (accessed on 03 July 2025).
- Blatnik, A.; Batagelj, B. Evaluating GNSS Receiver Resilience: A Study on Simulation Environment Repeatability. Electronics 2025, 14, 1797. [CrossRef]
- SeRo Systems: Detecting and Monitoring GPS Jamming and Spoofing in the Airspace. Available online: https://www.sero-systems.de/case-studies/tracking-the-threat? (accessed on 03 July 2025).
- NIST: Post-Quantum Cryptography. Available online: https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-cryptography (accessed on 04 July 2025).
- NIST: Status Report on the Fourth Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process. Available online: https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/ir/8545/final (accessed on 04 July 2025).
- ITU: SG17: Security. Available online: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/studygroups/2017-2020/17/Pages/default.aspx (accessed on 05 July 2025).
- ITU: X.1303: Common alerting protocol. Available online: https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-X.1303-200709-I/en (accessed on 05 July 2025).
- ENISA: State of cybersecurity in the EU. Available online: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/ (accessed on 07 July 2025).
- 3GPP: A Global Initiative. Available online: https://www.3gpp.org/ftp//Specs/archive/33_series/33.501/ (accessed on 07 July 2025).
- 3GPP: Portal. Available online: https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=3622 (accessed on 07 July 2025).
- Ghanbarzadeh, A.; Soleimani, M.; Soleimani, H. GNSS/GPS Spoofing and Jamming Identification Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning. arXiv:2501.02352 2025, 1–9. [CrossRef]
- Tedeschi, P.; Sciancalepore, S.; Di Pietro, R. Satellite-based communications security: A survey of threats, solutions, and research challenges. Computer Networks 2022, 216, 1–18. [CrossRef]
- Williams, L.; Khan, H.; Burnap, P. The Evolution of Digital Security by Design Using Temporal Network Analysis. Informatics 2025, 12, 8. [CrossRef]
- Trim, P.R.J.; Lee, Y.-I. Advances in Cybersecurity: Challenges and Solutions. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 4300. [CrossRef]
- Brezavšček, A.; Baggia, A. Recent Trends in Information and Cyber Security Maturity Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review. Systems 2025, 13, 52. [CrossRef]
- Kaur, J.; Ramkumar, K.R. The recent trends in cyber security: A review. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences 2022, 34 (8), 5766–5781. [CrossRef]
- Tarhan, K. Historical Development of Cybersecurity Studies: A Literature Review and Its Place in Security Studies. Przegląd Strategiczny 2022, 15, 393–414. [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Liu, Q. A comprehensive review study of cyber-attacks and cyber security; Emerging trends and recent developments. Energy Reports 2021, 7, 8176–8186. [CrossRef]
- Choi, J.; Lee, J. Secure and Scalable Internet of Things Model Using Post-Quantum MACsec. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 4215. [CrossRef]
- Hoque, S.; Aydeger, A.; Zeydan, E. Exploring Post Quantum Cryptography with Quantum Key Distribution for Sustainable Mobile Network Architecture Design. arXiv:2404.10602 2024, 1–8. [CrossRef]
- Mahmood, S.; Chadhar, M.; Firmin, S. Addressing Cybersecurity Challenges in Times of Crisis: Extending the Sociotechnical Systems Perspective. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 11610. [CrossRef]
- Saeed, S.; Altamimi, S.A.; Alkayyal, N.A.; Alshehri, E.; Alabbad, D.A. Digital Transformation and Cybersecurity Challenges for Businesses Resilience: Issues and Recommendations. Sensors 2023, 23, 6666. [CrossRef]
- Alaeifar, P.; Pal, S.; Jadidi, Z.; Hussain, M.; Foo, E. Current approaches and future directions for Cyber Threat Intelligence sharing: A survey. Journal of Information Security and Applications 2024, 83, 1–30. [CrossRef]
- Dritsas, E.; Trigka, M. A Survey on Cybersecurity in IoT. Future Internet 2025, 17, 30. [CrossRef]
- Han, D.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Lu, Y. Game-theoretic private blockchain design in edge computing networks. Digital Communications and Networks 2024, 10 (6), 1622–1634. [CrossRef]
- Gkonis, P.K.; Giannopoulos, A.; Nomikos, N.; Trakadas, P.; Sarakis, L.; Masip-Bruin, X. A Survey on Architectural Approaches for 6G Networks: Implementation Challenges, Current Trends, and Future Directions. Telecom 2025, 6, 27. [CrossRef]
- Lee, W.; Suh, E.S.; Kwak, W.Y.; Han, H. Comparative Analysis of 5G Mobile Communication Network Architectures. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2478. [CrossRef]
- Aziz, F.M.; Shamma, J.S.; Stüber, G.L. Resilience of LTE networks against smart jamming attacks: Wideband model. In 2015 IEEE 26th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Hong Kong, China, 30 August – 02 September 2015, pp. 1344-1348. [CrossRef]
- Winter, A.; Morrison, A.; Hasler, O.; Sokolova, N. Exploitation of 5G, LTE, and Automatic Identification System Signals for Fallback Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Navigation. Eng. Proc. 2025, 88, 49. [CrossRef]
- Boodai, J.; Alqahtani, A.; Frikha, M. Review of Physical Layer Security in 5G Wireless Networks. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 7277. [CrossRef]
- Scalise, P.; Garcia, R.; Boeding, M.; Hempel, M.; Sharif, H. An Applied Analysis of Securing 5G/6G Core Networks with Post-Quantum Key Encapsulation Methods. Electronics 2024, 13, 4258. [CrossRef]
- Vega-Sánchez, J.D.; Urquiza-Aguiar, L.; Paredes Paredes, M.C.; Moya Osorio, D.P. Survey on Physical Layer Security for 5G Wireless Networks. arXiv:2006.08044 2020, 1–15. [CrossRef]
- Kara, M.; Karampidis, K.; Panagiotakis, S.; Hammoudeh, M.; Felemban, M.; Papadourakis, G. Lightweight and Efficient Post Quantum Key Encapsulation Mechanism Based on Q-Problem. Electronics 2025, 14, 728. [CrossRef]
- Ehsan, M.A.; Alayed, W.; Rehman, A.U.; Hassan, W.U.; Zeeshan, A. Post-Quantum KEMs for IoT: A Study of Kyber and NTRU. Symmetry 2025, 17, 881. [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Ma, X.; Wu, C. The concept, technical architecture, applications and impacts of satellite internet: A systematic literature review. Heliyon 2024, 10 (13), e33793, . [CrossRef]
- Gao, S.; Cao, W.; Fan, L.; Liu, J. MBSE for Satellite Communication System Architecting. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 164051–164067. [CrossRef]
- Kang, M.; Park, S.; Lee, Y. A Survey on Satellite Communication System Security. Sensors 2024, 24, 2897. [CrossRef]
- Abdelsalam, N.; Al-Kuwari, S.; Erbad, A. Physical layer security in satellite communication: State-of-the-art and open problems. IET Commun. 2025, 19, e12830. [CrossRef]
- Salim, S.; Moustafa, N.; Reisslein, M.. 2025. Cybersecurity of Satellite Communications Systems: A Comprehensive Survey of the Space, Ground, and Links Segments. Commun. Surveys Tuts. 2025, 27 (1), 372–425. [CrossRef]
- Lichtman, M.; Jover, R.P.; Labib, M.; Rao, R.; Marojevic, V.; Reed, J.H.. LTE/LTE-a jamming, spoofing, and sniffing: threat assessment and mitigation. Comm. Mag. 2016, 54 (4), 54–61. [CrossRef]
- Radoš, K.; Brkić, M.; Begušić, D. Recent Advances on Jamming and Spoofing Detection in GNSS. Sensors 2024, 24, 4210. [CrossRef]
- Gallardo, F.; Pérez-Yuste, A.; Konovaltsev, A. Satellite Fingerprinting Methods for GNSS Spoofing Detection. Sensors 2024, 24, 7698. [CrossRef]
- Meng, L.; Yang, L.; Yang, W.; Zhang, L. A Survey of GNSS Spoofing and Anti-Spoofing Technology. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4826. [CrossRef]
- Yu, C.; Chen, S.; Wang, F.; Wei, Z. Improving 4G/5G air interface security: A survey of existing attacks on different LTE layers. Computer Networks 2021, 201, 108532. [CrossRef]
- Lichtman, M.; Rao, R.; Marojevic, V.; Reed, J.; Jover, R.P. 5G NR Jamming, Spoofing, and Sniffing: Threat Assessment and Mitigation. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), Kansas City, MO, USA, 20–24 May 2018, pp. 1–6. [CrossRef]
- Harvanek, M.; Bolcek, J.; Kufa, J.; Polak, L.; Simka, M.; Marsalek, R. Survey on 5G Physical Layer Security Threats and Countermeasures. Sensors 2024, 24, 5523. [CrossRef]
- Borhani-Darian, P.; Li, H.; Wu, P.; Closas, P. Deep neural network approach to detect GNSS spoofing attacks. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+2020), Online, 22-25 September 2020, pp. 3241–3252. [CrossRef]
- Al-Shareeda, M.A.; Manickam, S. Man-in-the-Middle Attacks in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs): Analysis and Evaluation. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1543. [CrossRef]
- Anthi, E.; Williams, L.; Ieropoulos, V.; Spyridopoulos, T. Investigating Radio Frequency Vulnerabilities in the Internet of Things (IoT). IoT 2024, 5, 356-380. [CrossRef]
- Osanaiye, O.; Alfa, A.S.; Hancke, G.P. A Statistical Approach to Detect Jamming Attacks in Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors 2018, 18, 1691. [CrossRef]
- Capotă, C.; Popescu, M.; Bădulă, E.-M.; Halunga, S.; Fratu, O.; Popescu, M. Intelligent Jammer on Mobile Network LTE Technology: A Study Case in Bucharest. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 12286. [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Chen, L.; Lu, Z.; Wang, F.; Liu, W.; Xiao, W.; Liu, P. Overview of Jamming Technology for Satellite Navigation. Machines 2023, 11, 768. [CrossRef]
- Rijnsdorp, J.; van Zwol, A.; Snijders, M. Satellite Navigation Signal Interference Detection and Machine Learning-Based Classification Techniques towards Product Implementation. Eng. Proc. 2023, 54, 60. [CrossRef]
- Ahn, J.; Hussain, R.; Kang, K.; Son, J. Exploring Encryption Algorithms and Network Protocols: A Comprehensive Survey of Threats and Vulnerabilities. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 2025. [CrossRef]
- Tsantikidou, K.; Sklavos, N. Threats, Attacks, and Cryptography Frameworks of Cybersecurity in Critical Infrastructures. Cryptography 2024, 8, 7. [CrossRef]
- Hernández-Álvarez, L.; Bullón Pérez, J.J.; Batista, F.K.; Queiruga-Dios, A. Security Threats and Cryptographic Protocols for Medical Wearables. Mathematics 2022, 10, 886. [CrossRef]
- Althamir, M.; Alabdulhay, A.; Yasin, M.M. A Systematic Literature Review on Symmetric and Asymmetric Encryption Comparison Key Size. In 2023 3rd International Conference on Smart Data Intelligence (ICSMDI), Trichy, India, 30–31 March 2023, pp. 110–117. [CrossRef]
- Huang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Li, M.; Zhu, L.; Zhu, Z.; Yang, X. A mutual authentication and key update protocol in satellite communication network. Automatika 2020, 61 (3), 334–344. [CrossRef]
- Ahmadi, M.; Kaur, J.; Rani Nayak, D.; Nutan, R.; Taw, S.; Afaq, Y. A Review of Various Symmetric Encryption Algorithms for Multiple Applications. In Proceedings of the KILBY 100 7th International Conference on Computing Sciences 2023 (ICCS 2023), Phagwara, India, 5 May 2023, pp. 1–6. [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y. An Asymmetric Encryption-Based Key Distribution Method for Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors 2023, 23, 6460. [CrossRef]
- Cherkaoui Dekkaki, K.; Tasic, I.; Cano, M.-D. Exploring Post-Quantum Cryptography: Review and Directions for the Transition Process. Technologies 2024, 12, 241. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Wang, J.; Lai, J.; Dong, M.; Zhu, Z.; Ma, R.; Yang, J. Research on Development Progress and Test Evaluation of Post-Quantum Cryptography. Entropy 2025, 27, 212. [CrossRef]
- Dam, D.-T.; Tran, T.-H.; Hoang, V.-P.; Pham, C.-K.; Hoang, T.-T. A Survey of Post-Quantum Cryptography: Start of a New Race. Cryptography 2023, 7, 40. [CrossRef]
- Demir, E.D.; Bilgin, B.; Onbasli, M.C. Performance Analysis and Industry Deployment of Post-Quantum Cryptography Algorithms. arXiv:2503.12952 2025, 1–6. [CrossRef]
- Ricci, S.; Dobias, P.; Malina, L.; Hajny, J.; Jedlicka, P. Hybrid Keys in Practice: Combining Classical, Quantum and Post-Quantum Cryptography. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 23206–23219. [CrossRef]
- SoftBank R&D: SoftBank Corp. and SandboxAQ Jointly Verify Hybrid Mode Quantum-safe Technology. Available online: https://www.softbank.jp/en/corp/technology/research/story-event/008/ (accessed on 12 July 2025).
- PostQuantum: Telecom’s Quantum-Safe Imperative: Challenges in Adopting Post-Quantum Cryptography. Available online: https://postquantum.com/post-quantum/telecom-pqc-challenges/ (accessed on 12 July 2025).
- NIST: Post-Quantum Cryptography and 5G Security: Tutorial. Available online: https://www.nist.gov/publications/post-quantum-cryptography-and-5g-security-tutorial (accessed on 12 July 2025).
- Rani, A.; Ai, X.; Gupta, A.; Adhikari, R.S.; Malaney, R. Combined Quantum and Post-Quantum Security for Earth-Satellite Channels. arXiv:2502.14240 2025, 1–9. [CrossRef]
- Schöffel, M.; Lauer, F.; Rheinländer, C.C.; Wehn, N. Secure IoT in the Era of Quantum Computers—Where Are the Bottlenecks? Sensors 2022, 22, 2484. [CrossRef]
- Borhani-Darian, P.; Li, H.; Wu, P.; Closas, P. Detecting GNSS spoofing using deep learning. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2024, 14, 1–19. [CrossRef]
- Birutis, A.; Mykkeltveit, A. Practical Jamming of a Commercial 5G Radio System at 3.6 GHz. Procedia Computer Science 2022, 205, 58-67. [CrossRef]
- Santo, A.D.; Tiberti, W.; Cassioli, D. An Adaptive Dual-Stack QKD-PQC Framework for Secure and Reliable Inter-Site Communication. In Joint National Conference on Cybersecurity (ITASEC & SERICS 2025), Bologna, Italy, 03–08 February 2025, pp. 1–12. URL: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3962/paper56.pdf.
- Chawla, D.; Mehra, P.S. A roadmap from classical cryptography to post-quantum resistant cryptography for 5G-enabled IoT: Challenges, opportunities and solutions. Internet of Things 2023, 24, 100950, . [CrossRef]
- Malina, L.; Popelova, L.; Dzurenda, P.; Hajny, J.; Martinasek, Z. On Feasibility of Post-Quantum Cryptography on Small Devices. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2018, 51 (6), 462-467. [CrossRef]
- Zeydan, E.; Baranda, J.; Mangues-Bafalluy, J. Post-Quantum Blockchain-Based Secure Service Orchestration in Multi-Cloud Networks. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 129520–129530. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, M. Post-quantum cryptography Algorithm’s standardization and performance analysis. Array 2022, 15, 100242. [CrossRef]
- Astarloa, A.; Lázaro, J.; Gárate, J.I. CRYSTALS-Dilithium post-quantum cyber-secure SoC for wired communications in critical systems. Internet of Things 2025, 33, 101656, . [CrossRef]
- Ojetunde, B.; Kurihara, T.; Yano, K.; Sakano, T.; Yokoyama, H. A Practical Implementation of Post-Quantum Cryptography for Secure Wireless Communication. Network 2025, 5, 20. [CrossRef]
- Wani, M.S.; Rademacher, M.; Horstmann, T.; Kretschmer, M. Security Vulnerabilities in 5G Non-Stand-Alone Networks: A Systematic Analysis and Attack Taxonomy. J. Cybersecur. Priv. 2024, 4, 23-40. [CrossRef]
- Erni, S.; Kotuliak, M.; Leu, P.; Roeschlin, M.; Capkun, S. AdaptOver: Adaptive Overshadowing Attacks in Cellular Networks. arXiv:2106.05039 2021, 1–13. [CrossRef]
- PatentPC: 5G & Cybersecurity: Network Threats Stats. Available online: https://patentpc.com/blog/5g-cybersecurity-network-threat-stats (accessed on 20 July 2025).
- Laktionov, I.; Diachenko, G.; Koval, V.; Yevstratiev, M. Computer-Oriented Model for Network Aggregation of Measurement Data in IoT Monitoring of Soil and Climatic Parameters of Agricultural Crop Production Enterprises. Baltic J. Modern Computing 2023, 11 (3), 500–522. [CrossRef]
- Laktionov, I.; Diachenko, G.; Kashtan, V.; Vizniuk, A.; Gorev, V.; Khabarlak, K.; Shedlovska, Y. A Comprehensive Review of Recent Approaches and Hardware-Software Technologies for Digitalisation and Intellectualisation of Open-Field Crop Production: Ukrainian Case Study in the Global Context. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2024, 225, 1–31. [CrossRef]
- Laktionov, I.S.; Vovna, O.V.; Kabanets, M.M.; Sheina, H.O.; Getman, I.A. Information model of the computer-integrated technology for wireless monitoring of the state of microclimate of industrial agricultural greenhouses. Instrumentation Mesure Metrologie 2021, 20 (6), 289 – 300. [CrossRef]
- Kashtan, V.Yu.; Hnatushenko, V.V.; Laktionov, I.S.; Diachenko, H.H. Intelligent Sentinel satellite image processing technology for land cover mapping. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu 2024, 5, 143–150. [CrossRef]









| Category | Criteria for the Selection and Evaluation of Scientific Literature |
|---|---|
| Primary publication time range | 2020–2025 |
| Extended publication time range | 2015–2025 |
| Scientometric databases | Web of Science, Scopus |
| Main digital libraries | MDPI, Elsevier, IEEE Xplore, ArXiv |
| Types of literature | Scientific papers in peer-reviewed periodicals, international conference proceedings, preprints, information and analytical web resources |
| Primary language | English |
| Main subject areas | Cybersecurity, computer networks and communications, signal processing, artificial intelligence |
| Additional subject areas | Computer science applications, control and systems engineering, electrical and electronic engineering |
| Main search query | Cybersecurity AND (Post-quantum cryptography OR PQC) AND (Mobile communication OR Satellite communication OR Infocommunication) |
| Additional keywords | 5G, 6G, LTE, RF spoofing, security, IoT encryption, GNSS jamming, cryptography algorithms, communication protocols, cyberattacks, network |
| Hierarchical level | Mobile communication | Satellite communication |
|---|---|---|
| Physical | Radio channel jamming, signal spoofing, passive eavesdropping, signal distortion or delay (signal overshadowing) | jamming of satellite signals, radio interception of broadcast signals, unauthorised signal capture in receivers, spoofing of navigation or relay data |
| Channel | use of fake base stations for a ‘man-in-the-middle’ cyberattack, impact on retransmission algorithms (RLC-layer manipulation), resource exhaustion through creation of fake connections | injection of malicious data into open channels, formation of false messages |
| Signal | forced downgrading of encryption or technology, attacks on the handover process to overload | compromise of telemetry, substitution of control signals for navigation systems |
| Authentication | vulnerabilities of authentication protocols, lack of encryption at the level of certain messages | absence or weak means of checking the integrity of commands |
| Infrastructure | compromise of kernel nodes, attacks on key management systems, DNS spoofing | disruption of communication between network segments, unauthorised access to satellite system gateways |
| The subject of the study | Technologies and approaches used | Scientific and applied effect obtained | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Approaches to the utilisation of potential post-quantum key encapsulation mechanisms and digital signature algorithms to modern low-power IoT infrastructure | Public-key infrastructures (PKI), IoT, PQC | It has been proven that a rational combination of several DSAs yields the most energy-, latency-, and memory-efficient public key infrastructure, and that isogeny-based, code-based, and lattice-based algorithms can be efficiently implemented on low-power IoT edge devices equipped with off-the-shelf Cortex-M4 microcontrollers while still ensuring acceptable battery life | [71] |
| GNSS spoofing detection technologies using RF interference and fingerprinting | Application of machine learning based on RF fingerprinting and CNN for identification of fake signals | It has been proven that the methods of fingerprinting proposed by the authors can increase the detection accuracy of existing methods from 95.68 % to 99.7 % and can be combined with other methods to improve the overall performance of detection systems | [43] |
| A systematic analysis of methods for detecting cyberthreats such as jamming and spoofing in GNSS | Comparative analysis and systematic generalisation of methods based on indicators using direction of arrival (DoA), time of arrival (ToA) and National Marine Electronics Association (NMEA) messages analysis | The selected methods are organized and classified based on specific parameters and characteristics, with particular emphasis on the latest developments in the field | [42] |
| Technologies and approaches to GNSS spoofing detection based on ML classification algorithms. | Using signal pre-processing based on wavelet transform and SVM/CNN models for the classification of abnormal signal behaviour | A data-driven classifier has been proposed, combining a parallelised deep learning model with a clustering algorithm to estimate spoofing signal parameters. Experiments show it outperforms existing methods, particularly at moderate to high signal-to-noise levels | [72] |
| Detecting the reaction of a commercial 5G radio system to jamming and determining the jamming signal strength required to disrupt 5G communications | 5G, multiple-input multiple-output antenna operating at the 3.6 GHz frequency band | The authors proved that the 5G radio system has been able to adapt to the interference by lowering the modulation and coding order until a breaking point was reached, at which the interference signal overwhelmed the user equipment signal in the uplink, resulting in a 5G connection failure. | [73] |
| A flexible dual-layer QKD-PQC Architecture for secure and stable site-to-site communication | Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) and Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) | The authors developed a modular, hybrid, and adaptive protocol that combines QKD with PQC, enabling uninterrupted quantum-safe key exchanges even in challenging network environments where traditional QKD methods often fail | [74] |
| An approach to the transformational transition from classical to PQC in 5G-enabled IoT networks, taking into account current solutions, challenges and development prospects. | 5G, IoT, PQC, QKD | The authors provided a comprehensive survey of a structured roadmap for quantum-secured communication in 5G-enabled IoT systems, encompassing current research developments, enabling technologies, security threats, and the latest quantum-based solutions and initiatives | [75] |
| The practicality of implementing post-quantum cryptography on resource-constrained devices commonly found in mobile and IoT networks | ARM-based platforms, PQC, IoT | The authors analysed and evaluated the performance and message sizes of selected post-quantum key exchange schemes on various ARM-based platforms. | [76] |
| Applied evaluation of PQK encapsulation for enhancing security in 5G/6G core networks | 5G, 6G, PQK, PQC | This study details the integration process, emphasizing the latency characteristics of various PQC encapsulations during the initial handshakes between virtual network functions and their impact on packet size and relevance within 5G environments. The findings reveal only a minimal increase in UE connection setup time and a modest rise in data usage, suggesting that the security advantages of incorporating PQC into 5G and 6G core services significantly outweigh the associated performance trade-offs. | [32] |
| An approach to PQC blockchain framework for service orchestration across multi-cloud networks | PQC, blockchain, cloud technologies | This paper investigates managing network services across multiple administrative domains using blockchain networks secured by PQC. Employing a PQC algorithm leveraging Toom-Cook parallelization at various security levels demonstrates that Quorum achieves lower average write times compared to Ethereum and Hyperledger | [77] |
| Approaches to standardisation and performance evaluation of PQC algorithms | PQC, information and communications technology | This research reviewed the global efforts in designing and standardising quantum-safe cryptography algorithms and analysed the performance of key candidates. It has been highlighted that most quantum-safe algorithms require more CPU, memory, and larger keys, and aim to assess their overall feasibility. | [78] |
| A novel proof-of-concept semiconductor implementation that meets the power consumption, resource efficiency, and PQC security requirements for Industrial IoT applications. | PQC, industrial IoT (IIOT) | This work introduces a novel semiconductor proof-of-concept that addresses resource usage, power efficiency, and PQC security requirements for IIoT applications. The study details the RTL architecture of the CRYSTALS-Dilithium IP and develops a System-on-Chip integrating a RISC-V CPU with this IP to evaluate PQC feasibility on resource-constrained IIoT hardware. | [79] |
| An approach to the practical deployment of PQC algorithms in wireless communication security | PQC, PQC–AES hybrid schemes, wireless communication networks | This paper presents a novel framework for standalone and hybrid PQC–AES public-key encryption protocols. Results show improved balance between security and performance compared to traditional methods, supported by a thorough security analysis confirming their robustness against various attacks. | [80] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).