Submitted:
24 July 2025
Posted:
25 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Solar Chimney Working Principles and Fundamental Components
3. Geometrical Characteristics of Solar Chimney Components
3.1. Chimney Height
3.2. Chimney Diameter
3.3. Collector Inlet Height
3.4. Collector Diameter
3.5. Examination of Geometrical Specifications and Thermal Performance
4. Other Geometrical Assesments
4.1. Turbine Design
4.2. Collector Outlet to Inlet Ratio
4.3. Vertical Collector
4.4. Collector Geometry
4.5. Divergent Chimney
5. Enhanced Configurations
5.1. Metalic Tubes Inside the Collector
5.2. Baffles
5.3. Guide Vanes
6. Material Selection
7. Optical Properties
8. Energy Storage to Mitigate Intermittency
9. Environmental Conditions
9.1. Effect of Wind On the Performance of Solar Chimney
9.2. Effect of Solar Radiation Intensity
9.3. Effect of Ambient Temperature
10. Innovative Structures
11. Combined Solar Mechanisms With Solar Chimney
11.1. Desalination
11.2. Photovoltaics
11.3. Solar Dryer
11.4. Other Systems
12. Conclusions and Future Work
- •
- Moving forward, we recommend a significant shift towards experimental investigations that address the limitations of current research. Firstly, while small-scale solar chimney performance has been extensively studied, there is a pressing need for experimental data from medium- and large-scale prototypes to validate scaling effects and assess real-world energy generation potential. Understanding the performance characteristics and potential challenges associated with larger systems is crucial for their eventual deployment.
- •
- The material selection in experimental studies has predominantly focused on the solar collector. To gain a more holistic understanding of system performance, future experiments should place greater emphasis on the material properties of the chimney itself, investigating their impact on airflow and overall efficiency.
- •
- The incident angle of solar radiation, a known significant factor for solar collectors, has often been overlooked in experimental studies of solar chimneys. Future work should prioritize detailed investigations into the transient behavior of solar chimneys under varying incident angles throughout the day, providing crucial insights for optimizing collector design and system operation.
- •
- Given the geographical dependence of solar energy systems, exploring the impact of collector orientation is vital. Specifically, for the northern hemisphere, experimental studies investigating the performance of south-facing collectors, including novel designs like half-circular configurations, warrant further attention.
- •
- Considering the ultimate goal of electricity generation, there is a significant lack of experimental studies integrating turbines within solar chimney setups. Future research must focus on the practical challenges and performance characteristics of solar chimneys coupled with turbine systems to better evaluate their power generation capabilities.
- •
- Exploring alternative collector designs, such as vertical collectors combined with concentrators, represents a promising avenue for performance enhancement that has received limited experimental attention. Future studies should investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of such configurations.
- •
- The integration of energy storage remains a critical area for development. Future experimental work should focus on testing a wider range of materials for thermal energy storage within solar chimneys, alongside optimizing parameters like material thickness and placement to improve system efficiency and dispatchability.
- •
- Recognizing the growing global challenge of freshwater scarcity, further experimental investigation into solar-driven desalination chimneys is essential. Research should focus on optimizing the integration of desalination [100] units with solar chimneys to enhance the economic viability and efficiency of this sustainable solution.
- •
- The influence of atmospheric optical properties such as sky clearness and air pollution on solar radiation collection deserves more detailed experimental analysis. Additionally, exploring the use of advanced materials like iron-free glasses and Fresnel lenses for the collector cover to increase transmissivity warrants experimental investigation. Furthermore, the impact of environmental parameters such as relative humidity and air density on solar chimney performance should be more thoroughly examined through controlled experiments.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Nomenclature
| CFD | Computational Fluid Dynamics |
| EAHE | Earth to Air Heat Exchanger |
| EHD | Electrohydrodynamic |
| IGV | Inlet Guide Vane |
| PCM | Phase change Material |
| PV | Photovoltaic |
| SCPP | Solar Chimney Power Plant |
| TES | Thermal Energy Storage |
| Height of the chimney (m) | |
| g | Gravitational acceleration (m/s2) |
| Turbine pressure drop (Pa) | |
| Volumetric flow rate of air (m3/s) | |
| Efficiency of the turbine-generator system (dimensionless) | |
| Air density (kg/m3) | |
| Velocity of air at the chimney inlet (m/s) | |
| Specific heat capacity of air (J/kg·K) | |
| Temperature difference between the collector inlet and outlet (K) | |
| G | Solar radiation intensity (W/m2) |
| A | Area (m2) |
| Ambient temperature (K) |
References
- Kasaeian, A.; Molana, S.; Rahmani, K.; Wen, D. A review on solar chimney systems. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews 2017, 67, 954–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kassaei, F.; Ghodsi, A.; Jadidi, A.M.; Valipour, M.S. Experimental studies on solar chimneys for natural ventilation in domestic applications: a comprehensive review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022, 29, 73842–73855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Kayiem, H.H.; Aja, O.C. Historic and recent progress in solar chimney power plant enhancing technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2016, 58, 1269–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuce, E.; Cuce, P.M. Chapter Five - Investigation of mathematical and theoretical models of the solar chimney power plants. In Solar Chimney Power Plants; Cuce, E.; Cuce, P.M., Eds.; Wind Energy Engineering, Academic Press, 2025; pp. 115–138. [CrossRef]
- Shi, L.; Zhang, G.; Yang, W.; Huang, D.; Cheng, X.; Setunge, S. Determining the influencing factors on the performance of solar chimney in buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018, 88, 223–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rishak, Q.A.; Sultan, H.S.; Jawad, I.N. Experimental Study of The Performance of a Solar Chimney Power Plant Model in Basrah City. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research and Developments 2021, pp. 340–351.
- Bansod, P.; Thakre, S.; Wankhade, N. Expermentational data analysis of chimney operated solar power plant. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Tech 2016, 7, 225–231. [Google Scholar]
- Jemli, M.R.; Naili, N.; Farhat, A.; Guizani, A. Experimental investigation of solar tower with chimney effect installed in CRTEn, Tunisia. international journal of hydrogen energy 2017, 42, 8650–8660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, P.; Wang, Y.; Meng, Q.; Li, J. Experimental study on an indoor scale solar chimney setup in an artificial environment simulation laboratory. Applied Thermal Engineering 2016, 107, 818–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghalamchi, M.; Kasaeian, A.; Ghalamchi, M.; Mirzahosseini, A.H. An experimental study on the thermal performance of a solar chimney with different dimensional parameters. Renewable Energy 2016, 91, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fluri, T.; Pretorius, J.; Van Dyk, C.; Von Backström, T.; Kröger, D.; Van Zijl, G. Cost analysis of solar chimney power plants. Solar Energy 2009, 83, 246–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalbarczyk, E. The impact of solar power facilities on landscape. Architektura krajobrazu 2016, 2, 30–39. [Google Scholar]
- Cuce, E.; Cuce, P.M.; Carlucci, S.; Sen, H.; Sudhakar, K.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Daneshazarian, R. Solar chimney power plants: a review of the concepts, designs and performances. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehla, N.; Makade, R.; Thakur, N. Experimental analysis of a velocity field using variable chimney diameter for solar updraft tower. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 2011, 3, 3167–3171. [Google Scholar]
- Toghraie, D.; Karami, A.; Afrand, M.; Karimipour, A. Effects of geometric parameters on the performance of solar chimney power plants. Energy 2018, 162, 1052–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golzardi, S.; Mehdipour, R.; Baniamerian, Z. How collector entrance influences the solar chimney performance: experimental assessment. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 2021, 146, 813–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kasaeian, A.; Heidari, E.; Vatan, S.N. Experimental investigation of climatic effects on the efficiency of a solar chimney pilot power plant. Renewable and Sustainable energy reviews 2011, 15, 5202–5206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adamsab, K.; Vega, E.; Al-Hinai, A.H. An Experimental Investigation of a Small-scale Solar Updraft Tower in the Sultanate of Oman. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 2022, 93, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nia, E.S.; Ghazikhani, M. Dimensional investigation of solar chimney power plant based on numerical and experimental results. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 2023, 37, 101548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, E.F.; Tahseen, T.A.; Hassan, S.Y. Experimental investigation for a laboratory solar chimney; a practical study in Iraq. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER) 2020, 10, 1054–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haaf, W.; Friedrich, K.; Mayr, G.; Schlaich, J. Solar chimneys part I: principle and construction of the pilot plant in Manzanares. International Journal of solar energy 1983, 2, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasumarthi, N.; Sherif, S. Experimental and theoretical performance of a demonstration solar chimney model—Part II: experimental and theoretical results and economic analysis. International journal of energy research 1998, 22, 443–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gannon, A.J.; von Backstrom, T.W. Solar chimney turbine performance. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2003, 125, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gholamalizadeh, E.; Mansouri, S. A comprehensive approach to design and improve a solar chimney power plant: A special case–Kerman project. Applied Energy 2013, 102, 975–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, B.; Hou, G. Experimental study of temperature field in a solar chimney power setup. Applied Thermal Engineering 2007, 27, 2044–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, A.G.; Maia, C.B.; Cortez, M.F.; Valle, R.M. Technical feasibility assessment of a solar chimney for food drying. Solar Energy 2008, 82, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.; Yang, J. Temperature field of solar collector and application potential of solar chimney power systems in China. Journal of the Energy Institute 2008, 81, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maia, C.B.; Ferreira, A.G.; Valle, R.M.; Cortez, M.F. Analysis of the airflow in a prototype of a solar chimney dryer. Heat Transfer Engineering 2009, 30, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbarzadeh, A.; Johnson, P.; Singh, R. Examining potential benefits of combining a chimney with a salinity gradient solar pond for production of power in salt affected areas. Solar Energy 2009, 83, 1345–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buğutekin, A. An experimental investigation of the effect of periphery height and ground temperature changes on the solar chimney system. Isi Bilimi ve Teknigi Dergisi–Journal of Thermal Science and Technology 2012, 32, 51–58. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Dabbas, M.A. The first pilot demonstration: solar updraft tower power plant in Jordan. International Journal of Sustainable Energy 2012, 31, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuo, L.; Yuan, Y.; Li, Z.; Zheng, Y. Experimental research on solar chimneys integrated with seawater desalination under practical weather condition. Desalination 2012, 298, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Yu, Y.; Niu, F.; Shafik, M.; Chen, B. Performance of a coupled cooling system with earth-to-air heat exchanger and solar chimney. Renewable Energy 2014, 62, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalash, S.; Naimeh, W.; Ajib, S. Experimental investigation of the solar collector temperature field of a sloped solar updraft power plant prototype. Solar energy 2013, 98, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aja, O.C.; Al-Kayiem, H.H.; Karim, Z.A. Experimental investigation of the effect of wind speed and wind direction on a solar chimney power plant. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 2013, 179, 945–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakir, M.T.; Piash, M.B.K.; Akhter, M.S. Design, construction and performance test of a small solar chimney power plant. Global Journals Inc.(USA) 2014, 14. [Google Scholar]
- Okada, S.; Uchida, T.; Karasudani, T.; Ohya, Y. Improvement in solar chimney power generation by using a diffuser tower. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 2015, 137, 031009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kinan, A.; Sidik, N.C. Experimental studies on small scale of solar updraft power plant. Journal of Advanced Research Design 2016, 22, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Ohya, Y.; Wataka, M.; Watanabe, K.; Uchida, T. Laboratory experiment and numerical analysis of a new type of solar tower efficiently generating a thermal updraft. Energies 2016, 9, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, S.; Leung, D.Y.; Chen, M.Z.; Chan, J.C. Effect of guide wall on the potential of a solar chimney power plant. Renewable energy 2016, 96, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mekhail, T.; Rekaby, A.; Fathy, M.; Bassily, M.; Harte, R. Experimental and theoretical performance of mini solar chimney power plant. J. Clean Energy Technol 2017, 5, 294–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayadi, A.; Bouabidi, A.; Driss, Z.; Abid, M.S. Experimental and numerical analysis of the collector roof height effect on the solar chimney performance. Renewable energy 2018, 115, 649–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ridwan, A.; Hafizh, H.; Fauzi, M. Design and experimental test for solar chimney power plant: Case study in Riau Province, Indonesia. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing; 2018; Vol. 403, p. 012092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbood, M.H.; Abbas, M.R. Experimental study for ground type effect on solar chimney power plant. Kufa Journal of Engineering 2018, 9, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maia, C.B.; Ferreira, A.G.; Cabezas-Gómez, L.; Silva, J.d.O.C.; de Morais Hanriot, S. Thermodynamic analysis of the drying process of bananas in a small-scale solar updraft tower in Brazil. Renewable energy 2017, 114, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hadj, A.E.; Noureddine, S.; Mabrouk, D.M.; Belkhir, N.; Soumia, R. Experimental investigation of a small solar chimney in the south of Algeria. In Proceedings of the AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing; 2018; Vol. 1968, p. 030052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fadaei, N.; Yan, W.M.; Tafarroj, M.M.; Kasaeian, A. The application of artificial neural networks to predict the performance of solar chimney filled with phase change materials. Energy conversion and management 2018, 171, 1255–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, F.M.; Al-Sulaiman, F.A. Performance analysis of a solar chimney power plant design aided with reflectors. Energy conversion and management 2018, 177, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bashirnezhad, K.; Kebriyaee, S.A.; Moosavi, A.; et al. The experimental appraisement of the effect of energy storage on the performance of solar chimney using phase change material. Solar Energy 2018, 169, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasraoui, H.; Driss, Z.; Ayadi, A.; Bouabidi, A.; Kchaou, H. Numerical and experimental study of the impact of conical chimney angle on the thermodynamic characteristics of a solar chimney power plant. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering 2019, 233, 1185–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balijepalli, R.; Chandramohan, V.; Kirankumar, K. Development of a small scale plant for a solar chimney power plant (SCPP): A detailed fabrication procedure, experiments and performance parameters evaluation. Renewable Energy 2020, 148, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehla, N.; Kumar, K.; Kumar, M. Thermal analysis of solar updraft tower by using different absorbers with convergent chimney. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2019, 21, 1251–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Kayiem, H.H.; Aurybi, M.A.; Gilani, S.I. Influence of canopy condensate film on the performance of solar chimney power plant. Renewable energy 2019, 136, 1012–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahrainirad, L.; Hasan, M.K.; Fasel, H.F.; Gross, A. Experimental and numerical investigation of a roof-scale solar chimney. In Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum; 2020; p. 0838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avcı, A.S.; Karakaya, H.; Durmuş, A. Numerical and experimental investigation of solar chimney power plant system performance. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 2023, 45, 11296–11314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehdipour, R.; Golzardi, S.; Baniamerian, Z. Experimental justification of poor thermal and flow performance of solar chimney by an innovative indoor experimental setup. Renewable Energy 2020, 157, 1089–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuscu, H.; Eryener, D. The effect of flow rate on small solar chimney performance. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 2020, pp. 1–15. [CrossRef]
- Mokrani, O.B.E.K.; Ouahrani, M.R.; Sellami, M.H.; Segni, L. Experimental investigations of hybrid: geothermal water/solar chimney power plant. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 2020, pp. 1–18. [CrossRef]
- Mehdipour, R.; Baniamerian, Z.; Golzardi, S.; Murshed, S.S. Geometry modification of solar collector to improve performance of solar chimneys. Renewable Energy 2020, 162, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khidhir, D.K.; Atrooshi, S.A. Investigation of thermal concentration effect in a modified solar chimney. Solar Energy 2020, 206, 799–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, M.H.; Chen, L.; Lei, L.; He, P.; Cao, J.J.; He, Y.L.; Feng, Z.P.; Tao, W.Q. Experimental and numerical studies for applying hybrid solar chimney and photovoltaic system to the solar-assisted air cleaning system. Applied Energy 2020, 269, 115150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guzel, M.H.; Unal, R.E.; Kose, F. Experimental study of a micro-scale sloped solar chimney power plant. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 2021, 35, 5773–5779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belkhode, P.N.; Shelare, S.D.; Sakhale, C.N.; Kumar, R.; Shanmugan, S.; Soudagar, M.E.M.; Mujtaba, M. Performance analysis of roof collector used in the solar updraft tower. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2021, 48, 101619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Chen, J.; Dai, P.; Zhang, F.; Li, Q. Simulation and experimental study of the influence of the baffles on solar chimney power plant system. Processes 2021, 9, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajamurugu, N. Experimental Studies on an Inclined Collector Divergent Chimney Pilot Plant. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing; 2021; Vol. 850, p. 012008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aliaga, D.; Feick, R.; Brooks, W.; Mery, M.; Gers, R.; Levi, J.; Romero, C. Modified solar chimney configuration with a heat exchanger: Experiment and CFD simulation. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 2021, 22, 100850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, O.; Hassan, A.; Doud, R.; et al. Numerical and experimental assessment of PV/Solar Chimney. NTU Journal of Renewable Energy 2022, 2, 50–60. [Google Scholar]
- Maia, C.B.; Silva, J.d.O.C. Thermodynamic assessment of a small-scale solar chimney. Renewable Energy 2022, 186, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandal, D.K.; Pradhan, S.; Chakraborty, R.; Barman, A.; Biswas, N. Experimental investigation of a solar chimney power plant and its numerical verification of thermo-physical flow parameters for performance enhancement. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2022, 50, 101786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esmail, M.F.; Khodary, A.; Mekhail, T.; Hares, E. Effect of wind speed over the chimney on the updraft velocity of a solar chimney power plant: An experimental study. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 2022, 37, 102265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Nie, J.; Jia, J.; Su, H.; Tian, R.; Yan, S.; Gao, H. Structural optimization to reduce the environmental crosswind negative influence on the performance of a solar chimney power plant system. Solar Energy 2022, 241, 693–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuo, L.; Yan, Z.; Dai, P.; Zhou, T.; Qu, B.; Yuan, Y.; Ge, Y. Experimental research on the operation characteristics of solar chimney power plant combined with distillation (SCPPCD). Applied Energy 2022, 326, 120029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ikhlef, K.; Larbi, S.; Üçgül, İ. Experimental study of different thermal storage system effects on the performance of a small prototype solar chimney power plant. Renewable Energy 2022, 200, 516–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Likhith Raj, P.; Hemanth, P.; Phani Raju, N.; Rajamurugu, N.; S, Y. Studies on divergent solar chimney subjected to variable collector configurartions. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 2022, 44, 9522–9544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arefian, A.; Hosseini Abardeh, R. Ambient crosswind effect on the first integrated pilot of a floating solar chimney power plant: experimental and numerical approach. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 2021, pp. 1–19. [CrossRef]
- Kang, H.G.; So, H.S.; Lee, H.W.; Park, S.; Shin, J.H.; Seo, J.H. Airflow change and exergy analysis due to the installation of various types of partitions in the collector of a solar chimney power plant. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 2023, 37, 3807–3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussein, S.A.A.; Nima, M.A. NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF SEMICIRCULAR SOLAR UPDRAFT TOWER SYSTEM EMPLOYING POROUS COPPER METAL FOAM. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development 2023, 27, 596–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afsari, H.; Yousefi, M.R.; Sajjadi, M.; Shirvani, M. Experimental and numerical study on the integrated solar chimney system with solar still for water desalination. Energy Technology 2023, 11, 2300462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezaei, L.; Saeidi, S.; Sápi, A.; Senoukesh, M.A.; Gróf, G.; Chen, W.H.; Kónya, Z.; Klemeš, J.J. Efficiency improvement of the solar chimneys by insertion of hanging metallic tubes in the collector: Experiment and computational fluid dynamics simulation. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023, 415, 137692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagheri, S.; Hassanabad, M.G. Numerical and experimental investigation of a novel vertical solar chimney power plant for renewable energy production in urban areas. Sustainable Cities and Society 2023, p. 104700. [CrossRef]
- Hu, Q.; Wang, X.; Gamil, A.; Li, P. Experimental study of desalination using a system integrated by a glass-covered solar collection water basin and a heat dissipating chimney. Energy Nexus 2023, 9, 100171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nie, J.; Xu, J.; Su, H.; Gao, H.; Jia, J.; Guo, T. Optimization of characteristic parameters of rectangular solar chimney adapted to agricultural greenhouses. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 2024, 54, 103971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasad, R.; Ahmed, M.R. Experimental evaluation of the performance and power output enhancement of a divergent solar chimney power plant by increasing the chimney height. Frontiers in Energy Research 2024, 11, 1283818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsayed, A.M.; Gaheen, O.A.; Abdelrahman, M.; Aziz, M.A. An Experimental Investigation of a Solar Chimney Integrated with a Bladeless Wind Turbine for Sustainable Energy Harvesting. Energy 2024, p. 132154. [CrossRef]
- Moreno, S.; Hinojosa, J.; Dévora-Isiordia, G. Exploring water desalination in an arid climate: An experimental and numerical analysis of a compact solar chimney. Desalination 2024, 583, 117671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuo, L.; Xiao, C.; Yan, Z.; Guo, Z.; Huang, L.; Ge, Y. Experimental and simulation study on the performance of corrugated plate enhanced solar chimney power plant combined with distillation system. Desalination 2025, 600, 118534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merie, F.H.; Ahmed, O.K. Performance Augumation of PV/Solar Chimney Using Gravel Bed: Experimental Appraisal. Energy Storage 2025, 7, e70149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Ghezi, M.K.; Ashour, A.M.; Ali Kadhim, S.; Rashid, F.L. Influence study of different types of grounds on the solar chimney power plant performance. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 2025, 47, 6976–6995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Natarajan, R.; Yaknesh, S.; Prakash, K.; Al Awadh, M.; Al-Mdallal, Q.M. Parametric optimization of flow in a solar chimney power plant under variable semi elliptical constraints. Scientific reports 2025, 15, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haaf, W. Solar chimneys: part ii: preliminary test results from the Manzanares pilot plant. International Journal of Sustainable Energy 1984, 2, 141–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhtar, Z.; Rao, K. Study of economic viability of 200 MW solar chimney power plant in Rajasthan, India. In Proceedings of the 2014 1st International Conference on Non Conventional Energy (ICONCE 2014). IEEE; 2014; pp. 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasraoui, H.; Driss, Z.; Kchaou, H. Novel collector design for enhancing the performance of solar chimney power plant. Renewable Energy 2020, 145, 1658–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, M.R.; Patel, S.K. Computational and experimental studies on solar chimney power plants for power generation in Pacific Island countries. Energy Conversion and Management 2017, 149, 61–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, P.; Chandramohan, V. An experimental study on performance assessment of solar updraft tower power plant with guide vanes. Heat Transfer Engineering 2022, 44, 650–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afsari, H.; Yousefi, M.R.; Sajjadi, M.; Shirvani, M. Experimental and numerical study on effects of additional air height and existing soil layer under the collector of solar chimney. Energy Systems 2024, pp. 1–17. [CrossRef]
- Hassan, A.; Ahmed, O.K.; Abbas, E. Experimental study of performance of solar chimney. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing; 2021; Vol. 1094, p. 012046. [Google Scholar]
- Eryener, D.; Kuscu, H. Hybrid transpired solar collector updraft tower. Solar Energy 2018, 159, 561–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Kayiem, H.H.; Aurybi, M.A.; Gilani, S.I.; Ismaeel, A.A.; Mohammad, S.T. Performance evaluation of hybrid solar chimney for uninterrupted power generation. Energy 2019, 166, 490–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghalamchi, M.; Kasaeian, A.; Ghalamchi, M.; Fadaei, N.; Daneshazarian, R. Optimizing of solar chimney performance using electrohydrodynamic system based on array geometry. Energy Conversion and Management 2017, 135, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abedi, M.; Tan, X.; Klausner, J.F.; Bénard, A. Solar desalination chimneys: Investigation on the feasibility of integrating solar chimneys with humidification–dehumidification systems. Renewable Energy 2023, 202, 88–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]












| Reference | Year | Location | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haaf et al. [21] | 1983 | 244 | 1.85 | 10.16 | 194.6 | 15 | Manzanares, Spain | |
| Pasumarthi and Sherif [22] | 1998 | 9.14 | 0.15 | 0.61 | 7.92 | 2.4 | 30 | Gainesville, USA |
| Gannon and von Backstrom [23] | 2003 | 4.5 | - | 1.6 | - | 1.48 | - | stellenbosch, South Africa |
| Gholamalizade et al. [24] | 2005 | 1600 | - | 3 | 60 | - | - | Kerman, Iran |
| Zhou et al. [25] | 2007 | 10 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 8 | Hust, China | ||
| Ferreira et al. [26] | 2008 | 25 | 0.05 | 1 | 12.3 | Belo Horizonte, Brazil | ||
| Zhou and Yang [27] | 2008 | 10 | 0.05 | 0.3 | 8 | 24 | Wuhan, China | |
| Maia et al. [28] | 2009 | 25 | 0.5 | 1 | 11 | Belo Horizonte, Brazil | ||
| Akbarzadeh et al. [29] | 2009 | - | - | 0.35 | 8 | - | - | Victoria, Australia |
| Buğutekin [30] | 2010 | 27 | 0.05 | 0.8 | 17.15 | 5 | 25 | Adiyaman, Turkey |
| Al-Dabbas [31] | 2011 | 6 | - | 0.29 | 4 | 7 | - | Mutah, Jordan |
| Kasaeian et al. [17] | 2011 | 10 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 12 | 3 | 23 | Zanjan, Iran |
| Mehla et al. [14] | 2011 | 1.4 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 13 | Shimla, India |
| Zuo et al. [32] | 2012 | 4.5 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 2.5 | - | Nanjing, China | |
| Li et al. [33] | 2013 | - | - | 0.457 | 12.2 | - | Omaha, USA | |
| Kalash et al. [34] | 2013 | - | 0.05 | 0.31 | 9 | 2.9 | Damascus, Syria | |
| Aja et al. [35] | 2013 | - | 0.075 | 0.15 | 6 | 6 | 21 | Seri Iskandar, Malaysia |
| Sakir et al. [36] | 2014 | 4.57 | 0.2 | 0.152 | 3.05 | 1.8 | 4.5 | Rajshahi, Bangladesh |
| Okada et al. [37] | 2015 | 0.66 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 30 | Laboratory Condition |
| Guo et al. [9] | 2016 | 1.22 | 0.013 | 0.05 | 1 | 14.6 | Laboratory Condition | |
| Kinan and Sidik [38] | 2016 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.08 | 1.5 | 1.3 | - | Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
| Ohya et al. [39] | 2016 | 0.66 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 30 | Laboratory Condition |
| Bansod et al. [7] | 2016 | 1.8 | 0.003 | 0.04 | 2 | 9872 | 10 | Amravati, India |
| Ghalamchi et al. [10] | 2016 | 3 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 3 | 1.55 | 20 | Tehran, Iran |
| Hu et al. [40] | 2016 | 25 | 0.05 | 1 | 11 | Laboratory Condition | ||
| Mekhail et al. [41] | 2017 | 6 | 0.25 | 0.15 | 6 | - | - | Aswan, Egypt |
| Jemli et al. [8] | 2017 | 8 | - | 0.3 | 4 | - | 26.3 | Borj Cedria, Tunisia |
| Ayadi et al. [42] | 2017 | 2.75 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 3 | 1.3 | - | Sfax, Tunisia |
| Ridwan et al. [43] | 2017 | 0.575 | 0.06 | 0.083 | 1.93 | 2.2 | 10 | Riau, Indonesia |
| Abbood and Abbas [44] | 2017 | 6 | 0.03 | 0.25 | 6 | - | 23.2 | Kerbala, Iraq |
| Maia et al. [45] | 2017 | 25 | 0.05 | 1 | 12.3 | Belo Horizonte, Brazil | ||
| Hadj et al. [46] | 2018 | 3 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 4 | 2.4 | 18 | Ouargla, Algeria |
| Fadaei et al. [47] | 2018 | 3 | 0.06 | 0.2 | 3 | 2 | - | Tehran, Iran |
| Hussain and Al-Sulaiman [48] | 2018 | 1.6 | 0.003 | 0.15 | 2 | - | - | Dhahran, Saudi Arabia |
| Bashirnezhad et al. [49] | 2018 | 11 | 0.05 | 0.315 | 12 | - | Mashhad, Iran | |
| Nasraoui et al. [50] | 2018 | 3.7 | 0.1 | 0.154 | 2.95 | 1.65 | - | Sfax, Tunisia |
| Balijepalli et al. [51] | 2019 | 3.5 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 6 | Warangal, India | ||
| Mehla et al. [52] | 2019 | 1.86 | 0.09 | 0.3 | 1.78 | Panchkula, India | ||
| Al-Kayiem et al. [53] | 2019 | 6 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 6.65 | Seri Iskandar, Malaysia | ||
| Bahrainirad et al. [54] | 2020 | 4.13 | 0.15 | 0.3 | 5.9 | 1.1 | 15 | Tucson, Arizona |
| Avcı et al. [55] | 2020 | 25.2 | 0.6 | 1 | 11.5 | - | Batman, Turkey | |
| Mehdipour et al. [56] | 2020 | 2.25 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 2.5 | Laboratory condition | ||
| Kuscu and Eryener [57] | 2020 | 19.54 | 0.02 | 1.13 | 16.5 | Edirne, Turkey | ||
| Mokrani et al. [58] | 2020 | 12 | 0.05 | 0.2 | 8 | Algeria | ||
| Abbas et al. [20] | 2020 | 2 | 0.03 | 0.074 | 3 | 2.29 | - | Laboratory Condition |
| Mehdipour et al. [59] | 2020 | 2.26 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 1.94 | 1.63 | 39.02 | Laboratory Condition |
| Khidhir and Atrooshi [60] | 2020 | 9 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 6 | 2.4 | Erbil, Iraq | |
| Huang et al. [61] | 2020 | 2.6 | 0.035 | 0.08 | 2.05 | - | - | Laboratory Condition |
| Guzel et al. [62] | 2021 | 6.4 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 8 | 2.2 | 2.4 | Turkey |
| Rishak et al. [6] | 2021 | 3 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 5 | Basrah, Iraq |
| Belkhode et al. [63] | 2021 | 4.5 | 0.6 | 0.15 | 4.8 | 8.321 | 2.386 | Nagpur, India |
| Wang et al. [64] | 2021 | 2.44 | 0.06 | 0.2 | 2 | - | - | Qingdao, china |
| Rajamurugu [65] | 2021 | 3.6 | 0.2 | 0.37 | 3.2 | 3.1 | - | Chennai, India |
| Golzardi et al. [16] | 2021 | 2.257 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 1.94 | Laboratory Condition | ||
| Aliaga et al. [66] | 2021 | - | - | 0.15 | 2 | - | - | Laboratory Condition |
| Ahmed et al. [67] | 2022 | 3.485 | 0.035 | 0.1016 | 3 | - | Kirkuk, Iraq | |
| Maia and Silva [68] | 2022 | 5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 1.322 | - | Belo Horizonte, Brazil |
| Mandal et al. [69] | 2022 | 2.5 | 0.15 | 0.1 | 6 | 1.5 | - | Kolaghat, india |
| Esmail et al. [70] | 2022 | 28.5 | 1.25 | 1 | 19 | Aswan, Egypt | ||
| Wang et al. [71] | 2022 | 4 | 0.1 | 0.12 | 2.5 | - | Hohhot, China | |
| Zuo et al. [72] | 2022 | 6.25 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 4 | Nanjing, China | ||
| Ikhlef et al. [73] | 2022 | 5.93 | 0.05 | 0.24 | 4.2 | 12 | Algiers, Algeria | |
| Adamsab et al. [18] | 2022 | 1.7 | 0.07 | 0.023 | 2.14 | 1.4 | Al Musannah, Oman | |
| Likhith Raj et al. [74] | 2022 | 2.44 | 0.03 - 3 | 0.12 | 2 | Chennai, india | ||
| Arefian and Hosseini Abardeh [75] | 2022 | 8 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 8 | - | Tehran, Iran | |
| Kang et al. [76] | 2023 | 3 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 3 | Seoul, South Korea | ||
| Hussein and Nima [77] | 2023 | 4 | 0.03 | 0.065 | 3.5 | 1.7 | - | Baghdad, Iraq |
| Afsari et al. [78] | 2023 | 3.4 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 12 | 2.3 | 15 | Tehran, Iran |
| Nia and Ghazikhani [19] | 2023 | 5 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 4 | 2.1 | 10.6 | Zanjan, Iran |
| Rezaei et al. [79] | 2023 | 3.44 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 12 | Tehran, Iran | ||
| Bagheri and Hassanabad [80] | 2023 | 0.886 | 0.075 | 0.09 | 1.26 | Tehran, Iran | ||
| Hu et al. [81] | 2023 | 2 | 0.08 | 0.254 | 3 | - | Laboratory Condition | |
| Nie et al. [82] | 2024 | 2.4 | 0.1 | 0.08 | 1.3 | 1.535 | Bayannur, China | |
| Prasad and Ahmed [83] | 2024 | 3.2 | - | 0.658 | 8 | Suva, Fiji | ||
| Elsayed et al. [84] | 2024 | 5 | - | 0.25 | 3 | Giza, Egypt | ||
| Moreno et al. [85] | 2024 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.273 | 3 | - | - | Sonora, Mexico |
| Zuo et al. [86] | 2025 | 6.5 | 0.3 | 0.315 | 5.3 | - | Nanjing, China | |
| Merie and Ahmed [87] | 2025 | 5.6 | - | 0.1 | 3 | - | Kirkuk, Iraq | |
| Al-Ghezi et al. [88] | 2025 | 2 | 0.08 | 0.1 | 2 | - | Baghdad, Iraq | |
| Natarajan et al. [89] | 2025 | 2.6 | 0.03 | 0.18 | 4 | Chennai, India |
| Parameter | Effect | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Chimney height ↑ [6,7,8,9,10] | updraft velocity ↑, heat loss ↑, flow loss ↑, construction cost ↑ | There is an upper limit due to stability and function. |
| Chimney diameter ↓[10,13,14] | updraft velocity ↑ | There is a lower limit due to stability and turbine structure. |
| Collector inlet height ↓ [6,13,15,16,17,18,19] | temperature difference ↑, updraft velocity ↑ | Larger inlet height results in secondary flow pattern with heat and flow loss. |
| Collector diameter ↑ [8] | updraft velocity ↑ | Has an upper limit due to heat dispersion. |
| Collector outlet to inlet ratio ↑ [65,74] | updraft velocity ↑ | Different optimal values were reported. |
| Collector geometry [22,34,38,59,80,92] | Different results based on structure and environmental conditions | No specific shape was reported as the most efficient. |
| Divergent chimney [37,39,65,93] | updraft velocity ↑ | All reports are in agreement. |
| Baffles [64,71] | temperature rise ↑, updraft velocity ↑ | It results in more uniform temperature distribution and also regulates the incoming air velocity. |
| Guide vanes [40,73] | overall efficiency ↑, power output ↑ | Their most significant effect is mitigating turbulance. |
| Utilizing reflectors [48,53,60] | temperature difference ↑, updraft velocity ↑ | Reflectors increase the temperature gradient by enhancing the radiation intesity. |
| Energy storage [44,47,49,52,73,95] | temperature difference ↑, efficiency ↑ | They are suitable for continues power production at night hours. |
| Wind [35,70] | Increases updraft velocity at high speeds; if low, can cause downward flow in the chimney. Also induces convective heat loss through the collector cover. | Wind direction is a key factor to be utilized for enhancing updraft velocity inside the chimney. |
| Ambient temperature [8,17] | Can cause air inversion if low | It generally can control the temperature distribution inside the chimney. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).