Submitted:
03 July 2025
Posted:
04 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- Descriptive analysis
- Visual analysis
- Exploratory analysis with AI
3. Results
- (1)
-
Overall results: descriptive analysis of key indicators Analysis of the seven matches played by Morocco reveals remarkable defensive stability, accompanied by tactical adaptability depending on the opponent. Table 1 below summarizes the main collective indicators per match.Key observations: Morocco often allowed their opponents to have possession of the ball (less than 40 percent possession in 5 out of 7 matches) but showed excellent efficiency in transition. They applied a high level of pressure, particularly against Spain and France (> 285 actions). The number of shots on target remains low, reflecting a style based on verticality and managing periods of low intensity.
- (2)
-
Visual results: performance dynamics and profiles by phasea. Radar charts and average performance profile per match: Radar charts were generated for each match by normalizing key indicators (values ranging from 0 to 10). The profile for the semi-final against France shows a peak in possession and successful passes but a drop in offensive efficiency (shots on target/xG). The match against Spain shows an extreme defensive profile (low possession, high intensity, effective low block).b. Heatmaps and density of actions and receptions in the final third: Collective heatmaps reveal a high density on the right side (Hakimi–Ziyech) in offensive phases. A left-side recovery zone is exploited for quick transitions, Asymmetrical progression, depending on the opponent: the central axis is exploited against Portugal, while the wings are targeted against Croatia and Canada.c. Passing networks, cohesion, and structure: Passing networks indicate: Dominance of Hakimi/Ziyech connections (3.7 percent of total passes), A pivotal role for Amrabat and Ounahi in restarting play, a concentration of passes in the middle zone (4-1-4-1 playing model evolving to 5-4-1).
- (3)
-
Exploratory analysis: performance typologiesPCA (Principal Component Analysis) PCA reveals two major axes explaining 76 percent of the variance: Axis 1 (52 percent): Physical intensity vs. technical mastery; Axis 2 (24 percent): Verticality vs. build-up play. The matches against Belgium and Portugal feature a fast transition profile, whereas those against France and Canada are more closely aligned with an adaptive possession model. Unsupervised clustering The K-Means algorithm (k=3) identified three match profiles: tactically dominated but effective in transition (vs. Belgium, Portugal), matches played with a low block and intense defensive pressure (vs. Spain, Croatia 1), Open matches with defensive exposure (vs. France, Croatia 2). This typology provides an overview of Morocco’s adaptability depending on the context and stage of the tournament.The results highlight several clear findings: Morocco’s defensive consistency, supported by a structured midfield; low raw offensive output but a good efficiency ratio; an ability to adapt its playing style to the constraints imposed by its opponents (tactics, fatigue, stakes), and the crucial role of certain key players in creating chances (Amrabat, Ziyech, Hakimi). Here are the initial in-depth scientific findings.
| Match | Possession (%) | Shots (on target) | Passes completed (%) | Total distance (km) | High intensity (km) | Pressure applied | Total shots |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Croatia (1) | 35.2 | 2 | 81 | 106.3 | 14.5 | 250 | 5 |
| Belgium | 33.5 | 2 | 80 | 108.4 | 13.9 | 261 | 7 |
| Canada | 41.5 | 2 | 83 | 109.1 | 15.2 | 245 | 6 |
| Spain | 23.0 | 1 | 70 | 120.2 | 16.1 | 288 | 3 |
| Portugal | 27.5 | 1 | 75 | 112.6 | 14.8 | 277 | 5 |
| France | 49.1 | 3 | 89 | 118.9 | 16.0 | 299 | 13 |
| Croatia (2) | 45.1 | 2 | 87 | 111.5 | 15.5 | 277 | 7 |

| Match | Possession (%) | Shots (on target) | Passes completed (%) | Total distance (km) | High intensity (km) | Pressure applied | Total shots |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Croatia (1) | 35.2 | 2 | 81 | 106.3 | 14.5 | 250 | 5 |
| Belgium | 33.5 | 2 | 80 | 108.4 | 13.9 | 261 | 7 |
| Canada | 41.5 | 2 | 83 | 109.1 | 15.2 | 245 | 6 |
| Spain | 23.0 | 1 | 70 | 120.2 | 16.1 | 288 | 3 |
| Portugal | 27.5 | 1 | 75 | 112.6 | 14.8 | 277 | 5 |
| France | 49.1 | 3 | 89 | 118.9 | 16.0 | 299 | 13 |
| Croatia (2) | 45.1 | 2 | 87 | 111.5 | 15.5 | 277 | 7 |
| Match | Total distance (km) | High intensity (km) | Number of sprints | Accelerations | Decelerations | Avg. distance per player (km) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Croatia (1) | 106.3 | 14.5 | 118 | 415 | 410 | 9.66 |
| Belgium | 108.4 | 13.9 | 105 | 398 | 390 | 9.85 |
| Canada | 109.1 | 15.2 | 125 | 432 | 429 | 9.92 |
| Spain | 120.2 | 16.1 | 134 | 461 | 455 | 10.40 |
| Portugal | 112.6 | 14.8 | 121 | 444 | 438 | 9.91 |
| France | 118.9 | 16.0 | 139 | 470 | 463 | 10.30 |
| Croatia (2) | 111.5 | 15.5 | 132 | 452 | 447 | 9.97 |
| Player | Match | Distance (km) | High intensity (km) | Sprints |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amrabat | Croatia (1) | 9.43 | 1.63 | 21 |
| Amrabat | Belgium | 9.55 | 1.83 | 19 |
| Amrabat | Canada | 9.58 | 1.93 | 24 |
| Amrabat | Spain | 10.32 | 1.71 | 15 |
| Amrabat | Portugal | 9.85 | 1.88 | 15 |
| Amrabat | France | 9.68 | 1.67 | 15 |
| Amrabat | Croatia (2) | 9.87 | 2.01 | 27 |
| Hakimi | Croatia (1) | 9.86 | 1.91 | 22 |
| Hakimi | Belgium | 10.15 | 1.89 | 25 |
| Hakimi | Canada | 9.79 | 1.98 | 22 |
| Hakimi | Spain | 10.06 | 1.89 | 23 |
| Hakimi | Portugal | 10.19 | 1.83 | 24 |
| Hakimi | France | 9.66 | 1.74 | 16 |
| Hakimi | Croatia (2) | 10.02 | 1.89 | 27 |
| Ounahi | Croatia (1) | 9.78 | 1.65 | 17 |
| Ounahi | Belgium | 10.31 | 2.07 | 18 |
| Ounahi | Canada | 9.34 | 2.03 | 26 |
| Ounahi | Spain | 10.13 | 2.04 | 15 |
| Ounahi | Portugal | 10.48 | 1.73 | 20 |
| Ounahi | France | 10.35 | 2.06 | 18 |
| Ounahi | Croatia (2) | 9.86 | 1.81 | 18 |
| Ziyech | Croatia (1) | 9.64 | 1.74 | 27 |
| Ziyech | Belgium | 9.84 | 1.86 | 22 |
| Ziyech | Canada | 10.53 | 1.80 | 23 |
| Ziyech | Spain | 10.27 | 1.70 | 21 |
| Ziyech | Portugal | 10.41 | 2.09 | 17 |
| Ziyech | France | 9.92 | 1.68 | 16 |
| Ziyech | Croatia (2) | 9.78 | 2.16 | 26 |

4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- Outlook
6. Patents
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AI | Artificial Intelligence |
| FIFA | Fédération Internationale de Football Association |
| FRMF | Fédération Royale Marocaine de Football |
| GPS | Global Positioning System |
| HIA | High-Intensity Activity |
| PCA | Principal Component Analysis |
| xG | Expected Goals |
| WC | World Cup |
References
- Andrienko, G.; Andrienko, N.; Fuchs, G.; Wood, J. Visual analytics methodology for eye movement studies in football. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2021, 35, 1234–1255. [Google Scholar]
- Bilek, L.; Ugrinovic, I. Individual performance profiles in elite football: A multi-contextual analysis. Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 2023, 18, 33–45. [Google Scholar]
- McLoughlin, E.; O’Donoghue, P.; Sampaio, J. Performance indicators in football: A critical review and research agenda. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2021, 21, 135–151. [Google Scholar]
- McLoughlin, G.; O’Donoghue, P.; Hughes, M. Automated football performance analysis using machine learning: A systematic review. Int. J. Perform. Anal. Sport 2021, 21, 735–757. [Google Scholar]
- Perl, J.; Memmert, D.; Hagemann, N. Data analytics in elite sports: Tactical, physical and psychological dimensions. J. Sports Anal. 2020, 6, 145–162. [Google Scholar]
- Perl, J.; Memmert, D.; Lames, M. 3D spatiotemporal analysis of team sports: New perspectives for performance assessment. J. Sports Anal. 2020, 6, 89–104. [Google Scholar]
- Rein, R.; Memmert, D. Big data and tactical analysis in elite soccer: Future challenges and opportunities for sports science. SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sampaio, J.; Leite, N. Tactical behavior and match analysis in soccer: From descriptive to predictive models. Front. Sports Act. Living 2022, 4, 905478. [Google Scholar]
- Sampaio, J.; Leite, N. AI-based decision support systems in elite football: From match statistics to tactical modeling. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2022, 22, 1121–1135. [Google Scholar]
- Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA). FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022™ – Post-Match Reports; FIFA: Zurich, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Bourbousson, J.; Poizat, G.; Saury, J.; Seve, C. Team coordination in basketball: Description of the cognitive connections among teammates. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2010, 22, 150–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Gómez, M.A.; Lago-Peñas, C. Match performance profiles of goalkeepers of elite football teams. Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 2015, 10, 669–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russomanno, T.; Linke, D.; Geromiller, M.; Lames, M. Performance of performance indicators in football. Int. J. Perform. Anal. Sport 2020, 20, 1000–1015. [Google Scholar]
- Pappalardo, L.; Cintia, P.; Ferragina, P.; Massucco, E.; Pedreschi, D.; Giannotti, F. PlayeRank: Data-driven performance evaluation and player ranking in soccer via a machine learning approach. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2019, 10, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossi, A.; Pappalardo, L.; Cintia, P.; Iaia, M.; Fernandez, J.; Medina, D. Effective injury forecasting in soccer with GPS training data and machine learning. PLOS ONE 2018, 13, e0201264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Kim, B.; Chung, D.; Yoon, J.; Ko, S.-K. SoccerCPD: Formation and role change-point detection in soccer matches using spatiotemporal tracking data. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2022, 34, 4912–4925. [Google Scholar]
- Silvino, M.P.F.; Sarmento, H.; Teoldo, I. Comparing the tactical behavior of young soccer players in full- and small-sided games. J. Sports Sci. 2024, 42, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castellano, J.; Blanco-Villaseñor, Á.; Álvarez, D. Contextual variables and time-motion analysis in soccer. Int. J. Sports Med. 2011, 32, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Link, D.; Lang, S.; Seidenschwarz, P. Real-time quantification of danger in football using spatiotemporal tracking data. PLOS ONE 2016, 11, e0168768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Memmert, D.; Raabe, D. Data Analytics in Football: Positional Data Collection, Modelling and Analysis; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Lames, M.; McGarry, T. On the search for reliable performance indicators in game sports. Int. J. Perform. Anal. Sport 2007, 7, 62–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sampaio, J.; Leite, N. Performance indicators in game sports. In Routledge Handbook of Sports Performance Analysis; McGarry, T., O’Donoghue, P., Sampaio, J., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2013; pp. 115–126. [Google Scholar]
- Memmert, D. Teaching Tactical Creativity in Sport: Research and Practice; Routledge: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Gómez, M.A.; Lago-Peñas, C.; Pollard, R. Situational variables. In Routledge Handbook of Sports Performance Analysis; McGarry, T., O’Donoghue, P., Sampaio, J., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2013; pp. 259–269. [Google Scholar]
- Coutinho, D.; Gonçalves, B.; Travassos, B.; Folgado, H.; Figueira, B.; Sampaio, J. Different marks in the pitch constraint youth players’ performances during football small-sided games. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 2020, 91, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Llana, S.; Burriel, B.; Madrero, P.; Fernández, J. Is it worth the effort? Understanding and Contextualizing Physical Metrics in Soccer. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2204.02313. [Google Scholar]
- Sampaio, J.; Lago-Peñas, C.; Gómez, M.A. Tactical performance analysis in soccer: New trends and future directions. Sports Med. 2013, 43, 713–728. [Google Scholar]
- Memmert, D.; König, S. Künstliche Intelligenz und maschinelles Lernen in der Sportwissenschaft; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Gamble, D. Team performance indicators in Gaelic football. Ph.D. Thesis, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Fernández, J.; Bornn, L.; Cervone, D. Decomposing the immeasurable sport: A deep learning expected possession value framework for soccer. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, London, UK; 2018; pp. 320–328. [Google Scholar]
- Memmert, D.; Raabe, D. Data Analytics in Football: Positional Data Collection, Modelling and Analysis, 3rd ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, P.; Garganta, J.; Santos, R.; Teoldo, I. Application of entropy measures to analysis of patterns of play in soccer. Int. J. Perform. Anal. Sport 2014, 14, 421–433. [Google Scholar]








![]() |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
