Submitted:
04 July 2025
Posted:
07 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animal Cares
2.2. Animals, Diets, and Experimental Design
2.3. Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality
2.4. Bone Characteristics
2.5. Determinations of Oxidative Stress and Humeral Immunity
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Growth Performance
3.2. Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality
3.3. Bone Characteristics
3.4. Oxidative Stress and Immunity
4. Discussion
4.1. Growth Performance
4.2. Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality
4.3. Bone Characteristics
4.4. Oxidation Stress and Immunity
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bao, Y.; Choct, M.; Iji, P.; Bruerton, K. Trace mineral interactions in broiler chicken diets. Br Poult Sci 2010, 51, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Surai, P.F.; Fisinin, V.I. Selenium in poultry breeder nutrition: An update. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2014, 191, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surai, P.F.; Kochish, I.I.; Fisinin, V.I.; Velichko, O.A. Selenium in poultry nutrition: from sodium selenite to organic selenium sources. J Poult Sci 2018, 2, 79–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Güz, B.C.; de Jong, I.C.; Bol, U.E.; Kemp, B.; van Krimpen, M.; Molenaar, R.; van den Brand, H. Effects of organic macro and trace minerals in fast and slower growing broiler breeders’ diet on offspring growth performance and tibia characteristics. Poult Sci 2022, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byrne, L.; Murphy, R.A. Relative bioavailability of trace minerals in production animal nutrition: A Review. Animals 2022, 4, 1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brugger, D.; Wagner, B.; Windisch, W.M.; Schenkel, H.; Schulz, K.; Südekum, K.H.; Berk, A.; Pieper, R.; Kowalczyk, J.; Spolders, M. Review: Bioavailability of trace elements in farm animals: definition and practical considerations for improved assessment of efficacy and safety. Animal 2022, 16, 100598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.H.; Lu, L.; Wang, R.L.; Lei, H.L.; Li, S.F.; Zhang, L.Y.; Luo, X.G. Effects of supplemental zinc source and level on antioxidant ability and fat metabolism-related enzymes of broilers1. Poult Sci 2015, 94, 2686–2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alharbi, K.; Asnayanti, A.; Do, A.D.T.; Perera, R.; Al-Mitib, L.; Shwani, A.; Rebollo, M.A.; Kidd, M.T.; Alrubaye, A.A.K. Identifying dietary timing of organic trace minerals to reduce the incidence of osteomyelitis lameness in broiler chickens using the aerosol transmission model. Animals 2024, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.L.; Lu, L.; Luo, X.G.; Liu, B. An optimal dietary zinc level of broiler chicks fed a corn-soybean meal diet. Poult Sci 2007, 86, 2582–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vieira, R.; Ferket, P.; Malheiros, R.; Hannas, M.; Crivellari, R.; Moraes, V.; Elliott, S. Feeding low dietary levels of organic trace minerals improves broiler performance and reduces excretion of minerals in litter. Br Poult Sci 2020, 61, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franklin, S.B.; Young, M.B.; Ciacciariello, M. The impact of different sources of zinc, manganese, and copper on broiler performance and excreta output. Animals 2022, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro, M.V.; Bittencourt, L.C.; Hermes, R.G.; Rönnau, M.; Rorig, A.I.; Lima, F.K.; Fernandes, J.I.M. Mineral source and vitamin level in broiler diets: Effects on performance, yield, and meat quality. Braz J Poult Sci 2020, 22, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, A.; Caesar, D.D.; Pradesh Pashu-Chikitsa, M.; Vishwavidyalaya, V.; Jain, A.K.; Kumar Jain, A.; Shakkarpude, J.; Mourya, A.; Baghel, R.; Sharma, R.K. Can different concentration of chelated and inorganic trace minerals (Zn, Se and Cr) be an effective supplement for better production performance and carcass traits in broilers? J Entomol Zool Stud 2020, 8, 197–204. [Google Scholar]
- NRC. Nutrient Requirement of Poultry; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 20th ed.; Association of Official Analytic Chemists: Washington, DC, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Nollet, L.; Van Der Klis, J.D.; Lensing, M.; Spring, P. The effect of replacing inorganic with organic trace minerals in broiler diets on productive performance and mineral excretion. J Appl Poultry Res 2007, 16, 592–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- M’Sadeq, S.A.; Wu, S.B.; Choct, M.; Swick, R.A. Influence of trace mineral sources on broiler performance, lymphoid organ weights, apparent digestibility, and bone mineralization. Poult Sci 2018, 97, 3176–3182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Núñez, R.; Elliott, S.; Riboty, R. The effect of dietary supplementation of organic trace minerals on performance, mineral retention, lymphoid organs and antibody titres of broilers. J Appl Anim Nutr 2023, 11, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Świaȩtkiewicz, S.; Arczewska-WŁosek, A.; Józefiak, D. The efficacy of organic minerals in poultry nutrition: Review and implications of recent studies. World Poult Sci J 2014, 70(3), 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashmead, H. The absorption and metabolism iron amino acid chelate. Arch Latinoam Nutr 2001, 51, 13–21. [Google Scholar]
- Wedekind, K.J.; Hortin, A.E.; Baker, D.H.; Wedekind, K.J.; Baker, D. Methodology for assessing zinc bioavailability: efficacy estimates for zinc-methionine, zinc sulfate, and zinc oxide. J Anim Sci 1992, 70, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winiarska-Mieczan, A.; Kwiecień, M.; Purwin, C.; Jachimowicz-Rogowska, K.; Borsuk-Stanulewicz, M.; Pogorzelska-Przybyłek, P.; Kiczorowska, B. Fatty acid profile and dietary value of thigh meat of broiler chickens receiving mineral or organic forms of Zn. Animals 2024, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leeson, S.; Summers, J.D. Nutrition of the Chicken; University Books, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Underwood, E.J.; Suttle, N.F. The Mineral Nutrition of Livestock; CABI Pub, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Perry, T.W.; Cullison, A.E.; Lowrey, R.S. Feeds & Feeding; Prentice Hall, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Church, D.C.; Pond, W.G. Basic Animal Nutrition and Feeding; Wiley, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- van der Eijk, J.A.J.; Bakker, J.; Güz, B.C.; van Krimpen, M.M.; Molenaar, R.; van den Brand, H.; de Jong, I.C. Providing organic macro minerals and an elevated platform improved tibia characteristics, and increased locomotion and performance of fast- and slower-growing broilers. Poult Sci 2022, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frandson, R.D.; Wilke, W.L.; Fails, A.D. Anatomy and Physiology of Farm Animals; Wiley-Blackwell, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Azad, S.K.; Shariatmadari, F.; Torshizi, M.A.K.; Chiba, L. Comparative effect of zinc concentration and sources on growth performance, accumulation in tissues, tibia status, mineral excretion and immunity of broiler chickens. Braz J Poult Sci 2020, 22, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, A.K.; Mishra, A.; Singh, A.P.; Patel, P.; Sheikh, A.A.; Chandraker, T.R.; Vandre, R. Effects of different concentration of organic and inorganic trace minerals (zinc, selenium, and chromium) supplementation on expression of chTLR4 gene and humoral immune response in broilers. Vet World 2021, 14, 1093–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Ingredients (%) | Starter (1 – 21 days) | Grower (22 – 35 days) |
|---|---|---|
| Corn | 48.35 | 51.87 |
| Soybean meal 44% | 32.57 | 29.30 |
| Full fat soybean | 10.00 | 7.50 |
| Soybean oil | 4.80 | 5.73 |
| Lysine | 0.12 | 0.16 |
| Methionine | 0.25 | 0.31 |
| Limestone | 1.44 | 1.26 |
| Mono-calcium phosphate (MCP) | 1.47 | 1.36 |
| Choline chloride 60% | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| Salt | 0.44 | 0.45 |
| Premix* | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Calculated nutrient analysis | ||
| Metabolizable energy (ME, kcal/kg) | 3,100.00 | 3,150.00 |
| Crude protein (%) | 22.00 | 20.00 |
| Calcium (%) | 0.90 | 0.80 |
| Total phosphorus (%) | 0.70 | 0.65 |
| Available phosphorus (%) | 0.46 | 0.42 |
| Total Lysine (%) | 1.30 | 1.20 |
| Total Methionine (%) | 0.58 | 0.61 |
| Parameters | Groups | SEM | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILI | LLO | LLI | |||
| 1-21 days | |||||
| Initial weight (g/bird) | 48.87 | 48.87 | 48.65 | 0.08 | 0.50 |
| BWG (g/bird) | 963.39 | 982.63 | 963.43 | 6.05 | 0.34 |
| FI (g/bird) | 1,216.20 | 1,204.37 | 1,208.24 | 5.91 | 0.72 |
| FCR | 1.26a | 1.23b | 1.26a | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Mortality (%) | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 0.12 |
| 22-35 days | |||||
| BWG (g/bird) | 1,289.65 | 1,316.58 | 1,329.03 | 17.17 | 0.65 |
| FI (g/bird) | 2,191.26 | 2,228.20 | 2,157.18 | 19.62 | 0.35 |
| FCR | 1.71 | 1.70 | 1.62 | 0.02 | 0.15 |
| Mortality (%) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 1-35 days | |||||
| BWG (g/bird) | 2,253.04 | 2,299.21 | 2,292.46 | 19.43 | 0.60 |
| FI (g/bird) | 3,407.46 | 3,432.56 | 3,365.42 | 22.07 | 0.47 |
| FCR | 1.51 | 1.50 | 1.47 | 0.01 | 0.21 |
| Mortality (%) | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 0.12 |
| Parameters | Groups | SEM | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILI | LLO | LLI | |||
| Live weight (g/bird) | 2,577.94 | 2,595.63 | 2,619.75 | 38.81 | 0.91 |
| Plucked weight (g/bird) | 2,322.47 | 2,337.88 | 2,357.56 | 34.79 | 0.92 |
| Carcass weight (%) | 90.07 | 90.11 | 89.98 | 0.15 | 0.94 |
| Relative weight of primal cut (% of live weight) | |||||
| Head & neck (%) | 5.19 | 5.59 | 5.56 | 0.13 | 0.38 |
| Wing (%) | 7.35 | 7.94 | 7.68 | 0.16 | 0.31 |
| Breast (%) | 18.58 | 19.42 | 17.71 | 0.33 | 0.10 |
| Fillet (%) | 3.45b | 3.86a | 3.52b | 0.07 | 0.03 |
| Thigh (%) | 10.52a | 11.99b | 11.18ab | 0.23 | 0.02 |
| Drumstick (%) | 9.05 | 9.13 | 9.34 | 0.10 | 0.50 |
| Leg & feet (%) | 3.51 | 3.65 | 3.50 | 0.05 | 0.37 |
| Ribs (%) | 18.18 | 16.56 | 17.70 | 0.43 | 0.30 |
| Internal organs (% of live weight) | |||||
| Heart (%) | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.01 | 0.93 |
| Liver (%) | 2.28 | 2.25 | 2.34 | 0.06 | 0.84 |
| Gizzard (%) | 1.44 | 1.42 | 1.50 | 0.04 | 0.63 |
| Meat quality | |||||
| Ultimate pH | 5.95 | 5.96 | 5.94 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Drip loss (%) | 1.40 | 1.37 | 1.45 | 0.03 | 0.09 |
| Parameters | Groups | SEM | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILI | LLO | LLI | |||
| 21 days | |||||
| Fresh weight (mg) | 5,754.47 | 6,137.59 | 6,054.38 | 113.69 | 0.37 |
| Ash (%) | 41.16 | 40.28 | 38.80 | 0.51 | 0.16 |
| Length (mm) | 76.71 | 76.45 | 76.45 | 0.38 | 0.96 |
| Weight : length | 74.85 | 80.25 | 79.16 | 1.27 | 0.19 |
| Breaking strength (N) | 196.69 | 197.10 | 192.82 | 4.06 | 0.90 |
| Small outer diameter (mm) | 7.03 | 7.09 | 7.15 | 0.07 | 0.82 |
| Large outer diameter (mm) | 19.20 | 19.84 | 19.87 | 0.14 | 0.10 |
| 35 days | |||||
| Fresh weight (mg) | 13,913.04 | 14,355.36 | 13,714.88 | 368.55 | 0.78 |
| Ash (%) | 39.16 | 37.02 | 40.70 | 0.84 | 0.21 |
| Length (mm) | 101.42 | 101.87 | 101.43 | 1.17 | 0.99 |
| Weight : length | 136.52 | 139.90 | 133.98 | 2.46 | 0.63 |
| Breaking strength (N) | 406.40a | 345.01b | 342.62b | 11.00 | 0.02 |
| Small outer diameter (mm) | 9.03 | 8.78 | 8.98 | 0.11 | 0.64 |
| Large outer diameter (mm) | 26.18 | 26.15 | 25.66 | 0.20 | 0.49 |
| Parameters | Groups | SEM | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILI | LLO | LLI | |||
| Superoxide dismutase activity (SOD inhibition rate %) | |||||
| 21 days | 65.76 | 66.00 | 58.76 | 0.42 | 0.61 |
| 35 days | 61.94 | 65.62 | 67.68 | 0.59 | 0.99 |
| Malondialdehyde (MDA, nmol/ml) | |||||
| 21 days | 6.39 | 6.15 | 6.34 | 0.10 | 0.31 |
| 35 days | 7.88 | 7.52 | 6.77 | 0.08 | 0.70 |
|
Total IgG antibodies (ng/mL) | |||||
| 35 days | 103.51 | 106.40 | 100.09 | 1.23 | 0.91 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).