Introduction
Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is the major oilseed crop of India. It belongs to subfamily Papilionaceae of family Leguminosae and is highly self-pollinated due to cleistogamous flowers. It is an important cash crop for the farmers of the arid and semi-arid tropics, where most of the peanut cultivation is concentrated (Janila et al., 2016). Groundnut is a significant source of oil (45 to 50%), carbohydrates (20%), fibre, magnesium, zinc, folacin, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, iron, vitamins and three forms of fat-soluble tocopherols (α, γ and δ) hence, it is called “poor man’s almond” and play a key role in combating malnutrition (Mukri et al., 2014).
In India Groundnut is grown in an area of 5.396 M ha with a production of 11.31 Mt and productivity of 2,097 kg ha-1 and in Andhra Pradesh, it is grown in an area of 0.346 Mha and producing 0.360 Mt and the productivity on average is 1041 kg ha-1 (INDIASTAT, 2024-2025). Obtaining high yielding groundnut varieties is of prime importance to ensure food security needs.
Yield is a complex trait governed by many component characters with considerable degree of association in both positive and negative directions. Determining the relationship between yield and its constituent traits is extremely valuable since it serves as the foundation for selection. correlation is the biometrical technique that can be used to assess how strongly the character pairs are associated and to identify potential selection criteria for a breeding program. The present investigation was carried out to assess the nature and magnitude associations between pod yield and its component characters in F2 generation of groundnut.
Materials and Methods
The experimental material comprised 244 F₂ plants derived from the cross TCGS 1694 × ICGV 201179, developed and provided by the Groundnut Breeding Department, Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), ANGRAU, Tirupati. The field experiment was conducted at the Dryland Farm of RARS, ANGRAU, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, during the kharif season of 2024. Sowing was undertaken on 1st August 2024. The parental lines, TCGS 1694 and ICGV 201179, were sown on either side of the F₂ population—TCGS 1694 on the right and ICGV 201179 on the left—to facilitate comparative evaluation.
The F₂ population was sown in rows of 4 meters in length, with a spacing of 30 cm between rows and 10 cm between plants within the row. Standard agronomic practices were followed throughout the crop growth period to ensure optimal plant development.
Phenotypic observations were recorded on all 244 individual F₂ plants for the following traits: number of pods per plant, pod yield per plant (g), number of seeds per plant, seed yield per plant (g), shelling out-turn (%), hundred pod weight (g), and hundred seed weight (g). Correlation analysis among these traits was performed using OPSTAT statistical software to identify relationships contributing to yield improvement.
Results and Discussion
Correlation coefficients among yield and yield-related traits in the F₂ population of the cross TCGS 1694 × ICGV 201179 were computed and presented in
Table 1. The analysis revealed that pod yield per plant exhibited a highly significant and strong positive correlation with several key traits, including seed yield per plant (r = 0.954**), number of pods per plant (r = 0.940**), number of seeds per plant (r = 0.931**), hundred pod weight (r = 0.392**), hundred seed weight (r = 0.225**), and shelling out-turn (r = 0.131*). These associations suggest that these traits are directly and mutually associated with pod yield, making them important selection criteria for enhancing productivity in groundnut. Similar findings were reported by Prabhu
et al. (2015), Devi
et al. (2018), Wadikar
et al. (2018), Kumar
et al. (2019), Khan
et al. (2022), Yadav
et al. (2023), and Vaghasiya
et al. (2025). The positive correlation of pod yield with hundred pod weight aligns with results from Adlak (2019) and Vargheese
et al. (2024), while its association with shelling out-turn is consistent with Saritha
et al. (2018).
The number of pods per plant showed a strong positive and highly significant correlation with number of seeds per plant (r = 0.929**) and seed yield per plant (r = 0.867**), reinforcing their collective importance in yield improvement. These results corroborate previous findings by Anitha et al. (2014), Jain et al. (2016), Reddy et al. (2017), Hampannavar et al. (2018), Wadikar et al. (2018), Khan et al. (2022), Gali et al. (2023), Yadav et al. (2023), and Vaghasiya et al. (2025). However, number of pods per plant showed a non-significant and weak positive association with hundred pod weight (r = 0.119), hundred seed weight (r = 0.039), and shelling out-turn (r = 0.011). Similar trends were reported by Sravanthi et al. (2024) and Vaghasiya et al. (2025).
The number of seeds per plant showed a highly significant positive correlation with seed yield per plant (r = 0.923**), hundred seed weight (r = 0.251**), and shelling out-turn (r = 0.215**), whereas a non-significant negative correlation was observed with hundred pod weight (r = -0.014).
The seed yield per plant had a strong positive and highly significant association with hundred seed weight (r = 0.442**), shelling out-turn (r = 0.375**), and hundred pod weight (r = 0.297**). These findings are supported by Prabhu et al. (2015), Reddy et al. (2017), Khan et al. (2022), and Vaghasiya et al. (2025) for hundred seed weight; by Anitha et al. (2014), Jain et al. (2016), Hampannavar et al. (2018), Khan et al. (2022), and Yadav et al. (2023) for shelling out-turn; and by Kumari and Sasidharan (2020) for hundred seed weight.
Shelling out-turn exhibited a moderate but highly significant positive correlation with hundred pod weight (r = 0.392**) and hundred seed weight (r = 0.391**). These results are consistent with Suvarna (2020), Prabhu et al. (2015), Kannappan et al. (2022), and Kumar (2023).
Lastly, a highly significant positive association was observed between hundred pod weight and hundred seed weight (r = 0.657**), which is in agreement with findings of Anitha et al. (2014), Prabhu et al. (2015), Kumar et al. (2019), Kannappan et al. (2022), Kumar (2023), and Sravanthi et al. (2024).
These interrelationships highlight the importance of pod and seed traits in yield improvement and provide a robust basis for the selection of promising segregants in early generations.
Conclusion
The present investigation on the F₂ population derived from the cross TCGS 1694 × ICGV 201179 revealed significant genetic variability and strong positive correlations among key yield and yield-attributing traits. Pod yield per plant showed highly significant and positive associations with seed yield per plant, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant, hundred pod weight, hundred seed weight, and shelling out-turn, indicating their direct contribution to yield improvement. These traits can thus serve as effective selection indices in early-generation breeding for enhancing productivity in groundnut. The identified relationships provide valuable insights for groundnut breeders to formulate effective selection strategies and accelerate the development of high-yielding genotypes through phenotypic selection.
References
- Anitha, B.K., Manivannan, N., Anandakumar, C.R and Ganesamurthy, K. 2014. Correlation analysis among oil yield and component traits in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Madras Agricultural Journal. 101: 312-315. [CrossRef]
- Devi, G.M., Priya, M.S., Sekhar, M.R and Latha, P., Correlation and path analysis studies in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under organic and inorganic fertilizer managements. Andhra Pradesh Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 4(3): 199-206.
- Gali, S., Reddy, D.L., Prasanna, R.A., John, K., Sudhakar, P and Rao, V.S. 2023. Correlation and path coefficient analyses in large seeded peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) for kernel yield. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 14(1): 272-278.
- Hampannavar, M.R., Khan, H., Temburne, B.V., Janila, P and Amaregouda, A. 2018. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis studies for yield and yield attributes in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 7(1): 870-874.
- Janila, P., Pandey, M.K., Shasidhar, Y., Variath, M.T., Sriswathi, M., Khera, P., Manohar, S.S., Nagesh, P., Vishwakarma, M.K., Mishra, G.P. and Radhakrishnan, T. 2016. Molecular breeding for introgression of fatty acid desaturase mutant alleles (ahFAD2A and ahFAD2B) enhances oil quality in high and low oil containing peanut genotypes. Plant Science. 242: 203-213. [CrossRef]
- Kannappan, P.A., Viswanathan, P.L., Manivannan, N and Rajendran, L. 2022. Variability, correlation and path analyse in segregating population of groundnut (Arachis hypogaeae L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 13(3): 1099-1104. [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.M.H., Rafii, M.Y., Ramlee, S.I., Jusoh, M and Al Mamun, M. 2022. Path-coefficient and correlation analysis in Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea [L.] Verdc.) accessions over environments. Scientific Reports. 12(1): 1-12. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N., Ajay, B.C., Rathanakumar, A.L., Radhakrishnan, T., Mahatma, M.K., Kona, P and Chikani, B.M. 2019. Assessment of genetic variability for yield and quality traits in groundnut genotypes. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 10(1): 196-206. [CrossRef]
- Kumari, K and Sasidharan, N. 2020. Studies on genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis for morphological and yield traits in different Arachis spp. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 9(11): 1030-1039.
- Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India. Indiastat. 2024-2025. www.indiastatagri.com.
- Mukri, G., Jakkeral, S and Nadaf, H.L. 2014. Nutrition and fatty acid composition in different botanical groups of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in ICRISAT mini core collection. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 5(3): 489-494.
- Prabhu, R., Manivannan, N., Mothilal, A and Ibrahim, S.M., 2015. Correlation coefficient analysis for yield and yield attributes in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Archives. 15(2): 685-689.
- Rathode, S.S and Toprope, V.N. 2018. Studies on variability, character association and path analysis in Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). International Journal of Pure and Applied Biosciences. 6(2): 1381-1388.
- Reddy, A.T., Sekhar, M.R., Vijayabharathi, A., Pathy, T.L., Reddy, G.L and Jayalakshmi, V. 2017. Correlation and path analysis of kernel yield and its components in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 6(12): 10-16. [CrossRef]
- Saritha, K., Vasanthi, R., PriyA, M.S and Latha, P., genetic variability and correlation studies on physiological, yield and yield attributes in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Andhra Pradesh Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 4(3):218-222.
- Sravanti, K., Reddy, V.R., Mamatha, K., Navatha, N., Shankar, M., Vanisri, S and Reddy, M.M. 2024. Correlation and Path Coefficient Studies of Yield and Its Contributing Traits in Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology. 27(12): 1076-1082. [CrossRef]
- Vaghasiya, D.R., Dholariya, N.D., Mungala, M.P., Chaudhary, Y.J and Jambukiya, R.M. 2025. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in spanish bunch groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Archhives. 25: 291-296.
- Vargheese, R.L., Saravanan, S., Hepziba, S.J., Premkumari, S.M., Pushpam, A.K and Pillai, M.A. 2024. Genetic variability, correlation, and path analysis in the BC2F2 population of groundnut. Plant Science Today. 11(2): 723-729. 10.14719/pst.3282.
- Wadikar, P.B., Dake, A.D., Chavan, M.V and Thorat, G.S. 2018. Character association and variability studies of yield and its attributing characters in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 6: 924-929.
Table 1.
Pearson correlation coefficients among yield and yield-attributing traits in the F₂ population of the cross TCGS 1694 × ICGV 201179.
Table 1.
Pearson correlation coefficients among yield and yield-attributing traits in the F₂ population of the cross TCGS 1694 × ICGV 201179.
| |
NPP |
PYP |
NSP |
SYP |
SOT |
HPW |
HSW |
| NPP |
1.000 |
0.940** |
0.929** |
0.867** |
0.011 |
0.119 |
0.039 |
| PYP |
|
1.000 |
0.931** |
0.954** |
0131* |
0.392** |
0.225** |
| NSP |
|
|
1.000 |
0.923** |
0.215** |
0.251** |
-0.014 |
| SYP |
|
|
|
1.000 |
0.374** |
0.442** |
0.297** |
| SOT |
|
|
|
|
1.000 |
0.392** |
0.391** |
| HPW |
|
|
|
|
|
1.000 |
0.657** |
| HSW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.000 |
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).