Submitted:
20 June 2025
Posted:
24 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Descriptive Statistics
2.2. Correlation Analyses
2.3. Mediation Analyses
2.3.1. Methylation Levels of CpGs Mediate the Effect of Maternal Objective Hardship on Components of BAP (Table 3)
2.3.2. Methylation Levels of CpGs Mediate the Effect of Maternal Cognitive Appraisal on Components of BAP (Table 3)
2.4. Summary
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Participants
4.2. Questionnaires
4.3. Blood Collection and DNA Extraction
4.4. Infinium Human Methylation 450K BeadChip Array and Data Analysis
4.5. Selection of CpGs Within Genes of the PI3K-AKT/mTOR Pathway
4.6. Statistical Analysis
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| Abbreviations | The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript |
| AKT | AKT Serine/Threonine Kinase |
| ASD | Autism Spectrum Disorder |
| BCL2L1 | BCL2 Like |
| DNA | Deoxyribonucleic Acid |
| FNBP1 | Formin Binding Protein 1 |
| IES-R | Impact of Event Scale—Revised |
| mTOR | mechanistic target of rapamycin |
| NFKBIA | NFKB Inhibitor Alpha |
| P13K | phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase |
| PBMCs | Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells |
| PIK3CD | Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-Bisphosphate 3-Kinase Catalytic Subunit Delta |
| PNMS | Prenatal Maternal Stress |
| PPP2R5C | Protein Phosphatase 2 Regulatory Subunit B’Gamma |
| PPP2R5E | Protein Phosphatase 2 Regulatory Subunit B’Epsilon |
| PRKCH | Protein Kinase C Eta |
| PRRSL | Proline Rich 5 Like |
| PTSD | Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder |
| RPTOR | Regulatory Associated Protein of mTOR Complex 1 |
References
- American Psychiatric Association, D.; American Psychiatric Association, D. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5; American psychiatric association Washington, DC: 2013; Volume 5.
- Piven, J. The broad autism phenotype: a complementary strategy for molecular genetic studies of autism. American journal of medical genetics 2001, 105, 34–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hurley, R.S.; Losh, M.; Parlier, M.; Reznick, J.S.; Piven, J. The broad autism phenotype questionnaire. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2007, 37, 1679–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sasson, N.J.; Lam, K.S.; Childress, D.; Parlier, M.; Daniels, J.L.; Piven, J. The B road A utism P henotype Q uestionnaire: Prevalence and Diagnostic Classification. Autism Research 2013, 6, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wazana, A.; Székely, E.; Oberlander, T.F. Prenatal stress and child development; Springer: 2021.
- Lei, G.; Xi, Q.Q.; Jun, W.; Yu, H.; Wei, D.; Su, Y.Y.; Zhang, X. Association between prenatal environmental factors and child autism: a case control study in Tianjin, China. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 2015, 28, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Say, G.N.; Karabekiroğlu, K.; Babadağı, Z.; Yüce, M. Maternal stress and perinatal features in autism and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatr Int 2016, 58, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lafortune, S.; Laplante, D.P.; Elgbeili, G.; Li, X.; Lebel, S.; Dagenais, C.; King, S. Effect of Natural Disaster-Related Prenatal Maternal Stress on Child Development and Health: A Meta-Analytic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Alberts, I.; Li, X. Dysregulation of the IGF-I/PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in autism spectrum disorders. Int J Dev Neurosci 2014, 35, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, A.; Mehan, S. Targeting PI3K-AKT/mTOR signaling in the prevention of autism. Neurochem Int 2021, 147, 105067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahrling, J.B.; Laberge, R.M. Age-Related Neurodegeneration Prevention Through mTOR Inhibition: Potential Mechanisms and Remaining Questions. Curr Top Med Chem 2015, 15, 2139–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enriquez-Barreto, L.; Morales, M. The PI3K signaling pathway as a pharmacological target in Autism related disorders and Schizophrenia. Mol Cell Ther 2016, 4, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, S.; Dancause, K.; Turcotte-Tremblay, A.M.; Veru, F.; Laplante, D.P. Using natural disasters to study the effects of prenatal maternal stress on child health and development. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2012, 96, 273–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walder, D.J.; Laplante, D.P.; Sousa-Pires, A.; Veru, F.; Brunet, A.; King, S. Prenatal maternal stress predicts autism traits in 6½ year-old children: Project Ice Storm. Psychiatry Res 2014, 219, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, X.; Laplante, D.P.; Elgbeili, G.; King, S. Preconception and prenatal maternal stress are associated with broad autism phenotype in young adults: Project Ice Storm. J Dev Orig Health Dis 2023, 14, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cao-Lei, L.; Veru, F.; Elgbeili, G.; Szyf, M.; Laplante, D.P.; King, S. DNA methylation mediates the effect of exposure to prenatal maternal stress on cytokine production in children at age 13½ years: Project Ice Storm. Clin Epigenetics 2016, 8, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cao-Lei, L.; Massart, R.; Suderman, M.J.; Machnes, Z.; Elgbeili, G.; Laplante, D.P.; Szyf, M.; King, S. DNA methylation signatures triggered by prenatal maternal stress exposure to a natural disaster: Project Ice Storm. PLoS One 2014, 9, e107653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao-Lei, L.; Elgbeili, G.; Szyf, M.; Laplante, D.P.; King, S. Differential genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in childhood obesity. BMC Res Notes 2019, 12, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao-Lei, L.; Elgbeili, G.; Massart, R.; Laplante, D.P.; Szyf, M.; King, S. Pregnant women’s cognitive appraisal of a natural disaster affects DNA methylation in their children 13 years later: Project Ice Storm. Transl Psychiatry 2015, 5, e515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao-Lei, L.; Dancause, K.N.; Elgbeili, G.; Massart, R.; Szyf, M.; Liu, A.; Laplante, D.P.; King, S. DNA methylation mediates the impact of exposure to prenatal maternal stress on BMI and central adiposity in children at age 13½ years: Project Ice Storm. Epigenetics 2015, 10, 749–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao-Lei, L.; Dancause, K.N.; Elgbeili, G.; Laplante, D.P.; Szyf, M.; King, S. DNA methylation mediates the effect of maternal cognitive appraisal of a disaster in pregnancy on the child’s C-peptide secretion in adolescence: Project Ice Storm. PLoS One 2018, 13, e0192199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao-Lei, L.; Dancause, K.N.; Elgbeili, G.; Laplante, D.P.; Szyf, M.; King, S. Pregnant women’s cognitive appraisal of a natural disaster affects their children’s BMI and central adiposity via DNA methylation: Project Ice Storm. Early Hum Dev 2016, 103, 189–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weaver, I.C.; Cervoni, N.; Champagne, F.A.; D’Alessio, A.C.; Sharma, S.; Seckl, J.R.; Dymov, S.; Szyf, M.; Meaney, M.J. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat Neurosci 2004, 7, 847–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szyf, M.; Weaver, I.; Meaney, M. Maternal care, the epigenome and phenotypic differences in behavior. Reprod Toxicol 2007, 24, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bateson, P.; Gluckman, P.; Hanson, M. The biology of developmental plasticity and the Predictive Adaptive Response hypothesis. J Physiol 2014, 592, 2357–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hales, C.N.; Barker, D.J. The thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Br Med Bull 2001, 60, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, X.; Qureshi, M.N.I.; Laplante, D.P.; Elgbeili, G.; Jones, S.L.; Long, X.; Paquin, V.; Bezgin, G.; Lussier, F.; King, S.; et al. Atypical brain structure and function in young adults exposed to disaster-related prenatal maternal stress: Project Ice Storm. J Neurosci Res 2023, 101, 1849–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, X. Amygdala and hippocampal connectivity mediate the association between prenatal maternal stress and broad autism phenotype in young adults: Project Ice Storm. 2023.
- Cao-Lei, L.; Elgbeili, G.; Massart, R.; Laplante, D.P.; Szyf, M.; King, S. Pregnant women’s cognitive appraisal from a natural disaster affects DNA methylation in their children 13 years later: Project Ice Storm. Translational Psychiatry 2015, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunet, A.; St-Hilaire, A.; Jehel, L.; King, S. Validation of a French version of the impact of event scale-revised. Can J Psychiatry 2003, 48, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao-Lei, L.; Massart, R.; Suderman, M.; Machnes, Z.; Laplante, D.; Szyf, M.; King, S. DNA methylation signatures of prenatal maternal objective stress exposure to a natural disaster: Project Ice Storm. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e107653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krause, M.R.; Serlin, R.C.; Ward, S.E.; Rony, R.Y.; Ezenwa, M.O.; Naab, F. Testing mediation in nursing research: beyond Baron and Kenny. Nursing research 2010, 59, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preacher, K.J.; Hayes, A.F. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers: a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2004, 36, 717–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shrout, P.E.; Bolger, N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological methods 2002, 7, 422–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Efron, B.; Tibshirani, R. An introduction to the bootstrap, 1st ed.; Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Hayes, A.F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis; The Guilford Press: New York, 2013. [Google Scholar]

| Age 15 years (n = 27) | Age 16 years (n = 22) | Age 19 years (n = 13) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (or n) |
SD | Min. | Max. | Mean (or n) |
SD | Min. | Max. | Mean (or n) |
SD | Min. | Max. | |
| Sex of child | ||||||||||||
| Male | 15 | 13 | 4 | |||||||||
| Female | 12 | 9 | 9 | |||||||||
| Objective Hardship | 10.9615 | 3.96465 | 5.00 | 21.00 | 11.2857 | 4.38341 | 5.00 | 21.00 | 10.1538 | 3.02341 | 6.00 | 15.00 |
| Cognitive Appraisal | ||||||||||||
| Very Positive | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||||||||
| Neutral/Positive | 18 | 14 | 8 | |||||||||
| Negative | 8 | 7 | 5 | |||||||||
| Very Negative | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
| BAPQ_Aloof | 2.27333 | .600103 | 1.170 | 3.180 | 2.63273 | .902395 | 1.080 | 4.750 | 2.63538 | .933601 | 1.330 | 4.420 |
| BAPQ_PragLan | 2.37926 | .451407 | 1.330 | 3.170 | 2.42364 | .553186 | 1.080 | 3.580 | 2.15385 | .607447 | 1.000 | 2.750 |
| BAPQ_Rigid | 2.56741 | .564314 | 1.000 | 3.420 | 2.88591 | .712558 | 1.750 | 4.670 | 2.85846 | .687300 | 1.920 | 3.830 |
| BAPQ_Total | 2.40667 | .430724 | 1.470 | 3.030 | 2.64773 | .603221 | 1.610 | 3.670 | 2.55000 | .652712 | 1.530 | 3.310 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Objective Hardship | 1 | |||||||||||||
| 2. Cognitive Appraisal | .276 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| 3, K15_BAPQ_Aloof | .186 | .112 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 4. K15_BAPQ_PragLan | .083 | -.069 | .485* | 1 | ||||||||||
| 5. K15_BAPQ_Rigid | .312 | .140 | .481* | .407* | 1 | |||||||||
| 6. K15_BAPQ_ToT | .249 | .088 | .842** | .751** | .800** | 1 | ||||||||
| 7. K16_BAPQ_Aloof | .028 | -.191 | .534* | .324 | .347 | .548* | 1 | |||||||
| 8. K16_BAPQ_PragLan | .083 | -.174 | .517* | .774** | .378 | .719** | .435* | 1 | ||||||
| 9. K16_BAPQ_Rigid | .394 | -.021 | .410 | .394 | .688** | .667** | .601** | .555** | 1 | |||||
| 10. K16_BAPQ_ToT | .204 | -.156 | .589** | .555* | .541* | .750** | .868** | .741** | .864** | 1 | ||||
| 11. K19_BAPQ_Aloof | .370 | .015 | .708** | .225 | .471 | .596* | .538 | .364 | .626 | .582 | 1 | |||
| 12. K19_BAPQ_PragLan | .051 | -.116 | .659* | .754** | .620* | .827** | .518 | .849** | .474 | .677 | .650* | 1 | ||
| 13. K19_BAPQ_Rigid | .396 | .426 | .202 | -.072 | .644* | .350 | .218 | -.044 | .548 | .268 | .709** | .555* | 1 | |
| 14. K19_BAPQ_ToT | .329 | .119 | .623* | .308 | .659* | .672* | .501 | .405 | .657 | .586 | .929** | .817** | .861** | 1 |
| Significant Mediation Effects | Significant Effect Sizes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CpGs (genes) | Range of significant mediating effects |
Range of significant effect sizes (R2) |
||||||||
| PNMS | BAPQ | age | Total Tested |
Significant Mediating |
Minimum (Location) |
Maximum (Location) |
Mean Mediation |
Minimum (Location) |
Maximum (Location) |
Mean R2 |
| Objective Hardship | Aloof | 15 | 27 (18) | 20 (15) | -0.0200 (cg08792630 in FOXO3) |
-0.0361 (cg00689225 in NFKBIA) |
-0.0284 | 0.1791 (cg20171453 in RHOH) |
0.3119 (cg00689225 in NFKBIA) |
0.2260 |
| 16 | 18 (13) | -0.0262 (cg17904575 in PPP2R5C) |
-0.0547 (cg00689225 in NFKBIA) |
-0.0343 | 0.0941 (cg01320698 in PIK3CD) |
0.3823 (cg00689225 in NFKBIA) |
0.1967 | |||
| 19 | 7 (7) | -0.0945 (cg00689225 located in NFKBIA) |
-0.1161 (cg26360197 located in RPTOR) |
-0.1028 | 0.3378 (cg00689225 located in NFKBIA) |
0.4512 (cg11833768 located in PPP2R5E) |
0.4064 | |||
| Pragmatic language impairment | 15 | 17 (13) | -0.0129 (cg16518861 located in NFKBIA) |
-0.0251 (cg06491415 located in RPS6KA2) |
-0.0179 | 0.1007 (cg08223235 located in BCL2) |
0.2519 (cg05651511 located in RPTOR) |
0.1531 | ||
| 16 | 11 (8) | -0.0203 (cg07499142 in PIK3CD) |
-0.0506 (cg01320698 in PIK3CD) |
-0.0287 | 0.1544 (cg18758433 in RPTOR) |
0.3609 (cg01320698 in PIK3CD) |
0.2339 | |||
| 19 | 11 (10) | -0.0500 (cg18758433 in RPTOR) |
-0.0929 (cg26360197 in RPTOR) |
-0.0777 | 0.1834 (cg18758433 in RPTOR) |
0.4273 (cg23575275 in CDKN1A) |
0.3277 | |||
| Rigid personality | 15 | |||||||||
| 16 | 1(1) | -0.0283 (cg26601310 located in PRR5L) |
0.2867 (cg26601310 in PRR5L) |
|||||||
| 19 | ||||||||||
| Total BAP score | 15 | 18 (14) | -0.0138 (cg07499142 located in PIK3CD) |
-0.0237 (cg06491415 located in RPS6KA2) |
-0.0189 | 0.1512 (cg07499142 located in PIK3CD) |
0.3432 (cg05651511 located in RPTOR) |
0.2256 | ||
| 16 | 15 (11) | -0.0196 (cg17306848 in PRKCH) |
-0.0381 (cg01320698 in PIK3CD) |
-0.0258 | 0.1777 (cg13989999 in BCL2L1) |
0.3834 (cg00689225 in NFKBIA) |
0.2492 | |||
| 19 | 4 (4) | -0.0640 (cg23575275 in CDKN1A) |
-0.0785 (cg26360197 in RPTOR) |
-0.0686 | 0.0578 (cg23575275 in DKN1A) |
0.3849 (cg11833768 in PPP2R5E) |
0.2823 | |||
| Cognitive Appraisal | Aloof | 15 | 61(41) | 39 (33) | -0.0876 (cg14001486 in PRKCH) |
-0.2037 (cg04610450 in PIK3R2) |
-0.1458 | .1121 (cg22666015 in INPP5D) |
0.3008 (cg12873919 in BCL2L1) |
0.1891 |
| 16 | 31 (27) | -0.1370 (cg13916261 in FNBP1) |
-0.3626 (cg18758433 in RPTOR) |
-0.2278 | 0.1422 (cg00278517 in PS6KA2) |
0.3870 (cg18758433 in RPTOR) |
0.2166 | |||
| 19 | 4 (3) | -0.3259 (cg02481000 in PRKCZ) |
-0.3947 (cg22666015 in INPP5D) |
-0.3633 | 0.2544 (cg00300046 in PRKCZ) |
0.4497 (cg23575275 in CDKN1A) |
0.3273 | |||
| Pragmatic language impairment | 15 | 29 (24) | -0.0673 (cg25342409 in PIK3R5) |
-0.1180 (cg08557970 in RPS6KA2) |
-0.0897 | 0.0817 (cg25342409 in PIK3R5) |
0.1867 (cg16994041 in PRKAG2) |
0.1350 | ||
|
1 Positive Mediation |
0.0531 cg08257293 in BCL2L1 |
0.0966 cg08257293 in BCL2L1 |
||||||||
| 16 | 14 (13) | -0.0940 (cg00319686 in MAP2K1) |
-0.1519 (cg17904575 in PPP2R5C) |
-0.1259 | 0.1533 (cg26601310 in PRR5L) |
0.2632 (cg02015053 in EIF3J) |
0.1975 | |||
| 19 | 22 (18) | -0.1339 (cg24585377 in RPS6KA1) |
-0.3377 (cg02481000 in PRKCZ) |
-0.2165 | 0.2089 (cg24585377 in PS6KA1) |
0.7253 (cg02481000 in PRKCZ) |
0.3304 | |||
| Rigid personality | 15 | |||||||||
| 16 | 1(1) | -0.1577cg13916261 in FNBP1 | 0.2440cg13916261 in FNBP1 | |||||||
| 19 | ||||||||||
| Total BAP score | 15 | 31 (28) | -0.1242 (cg04610450 in PIK3R2) |
-0.0570 (cg23174662 in HIF1A) |
-0.0925 | 0.0889 (cg25342409 in PIK3R5) |
0.2234 (cg12873919 in BCL2L1) |
0.1454 | ||
| 16 | 10 (9) | -0.1123 (cg00319686 in MAP2K1) |
-0.1897 (cg18758433 in RPTOR) |
-0.1468 | 0.1772 (cg05581469 in RKAG1) |
0.2390 (cg18758433 in RPTOR) |
0.2071 | |||
| 19 | 4 (3) | -0.1966 (cg23575275 in CDKN1A) |
-0.3006 (cg22666015 in INPP5D) |
-0.2571 | 0.2741 (cg23575275 in DKN1A) |
0.4031 (cg02481000 in PRKCZ) |
0.3406 | |||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).