Preprint
Concept Paper

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Visual Perspective as an Emergent Heuristic: Insights for Self-Aware AI and World Modeling

Submitted:

19 June 2025

Posted:

20 June 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
This paper integrates the "Heuristic Physics" framework, which reinterprets physical laws as emergent, computationally viable heuristics, with the concept of embodied AI and the role of sensory feedback in developing self-awareness. We propose that visual perspective, far from being an ontological absolute, functions as a powerful semantic heuristic, enabling efficient world modeling and prediction in biological and artificial systems. Drawing parallels with 3D world building in game development, we illustrate how an AI, through continuous sensory-motor interaction and the development of a "synthetic insula," could "discover" and utilize such perceptual heuristics. This reframing offers a novel approach to AI's understanding of the physical world, moving from pre-programmed truths to adaptive, context-bound computational strategies for navigating complex environments and predicting cascading events.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction: Reconceptualizing Physical Laws and Perceptual Models

The traditional view of physical laws often posits them as absolute, ontological truths inscribed in the fabric of the cosmos. However, the "Heuristic Physics" framework, recently articulated by Rogério Figurelli [3], challenges this notion, proposing that physical laws are, in fact, "efficient symbolic compressions of deeper, probabilistic, and relational substrates". These laws persist not due to their fundamental truth, but because they are "functionally coherent across specific computational regimes" [3]. This paper extends this reinterpretation to perceptual models, specifically focusing on visual perspective, arguing that it serves as a powerful example of an emergent heuristic within a stratified epistemic architecture.
For artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in the pursuit of self-awareness and advanced predictive capabilities, this shift from ontological decree to semantic program is profound. Current AI systems often rely on pre-defined models of the world. However, truly adaptive and intuitive AI, capable of navigating and predicting complex physical trajectories and cascading events [1], requires a more dynamic and emergent understanding of its environment. We propose that an AI, through embodied interaction [4,5] and integrated feedback mechanisms akin to a "synthetic insula" [1,2], can develop an understanding of physical and perceptual "laws" as adaptive heuristics, akin to how 3D worlds are constructed and interpreted in game development.

2. Heuristic Physics: Laws as Adaptive Programs

Heuristic Physics interprets physical laws not as eternal truths but as "symbolic programs – heuristics – that emerge, stabilize, and persist because they are computationally efficient, relationally coherent, and semantically tractable" [3]. This framework suggests that the universe operates in layers of computational abstraction, where laws are "compiled locally, at the intersection of relational substrates and epistemic constraints" [3].
For instance, Newton's laws of motion are reinterpreted not as fundamental properties of reality, but as highly efficient symbolic compressions optimal for encoding macroscopic dynamical behavior where quantum contributions average out [3]. Causality itself is demoted from a metaphysical engine to a "semantic illusion," a compact symbolic rule that offers predictive traction within a bounded epistemic layer [3]. This implies that an intelligent agent, biological or artificial, learns to operate within these "computational regimes" by identifying and utilizing these robust, yet context-bound, semantic structures. This perspective aligns with broader ideas of computational universes [14] and informational views of reality [15].

3. Visual Perspective as a Perceptual Heuristic

Visual perspective, a cornerstone of human spatial understanding [7,9], provides a compelling analogue to the principles of Heuristic Physics. Rather than reflecting an absolute ontological truth about the nature of light or space, visual perspective operates as an sophisticated perceptual heuristic – a set of highly effective, learned "rules of thumb" that the brain employs to construct a 3D mental model from 2D retinal input [7].
Consider the classic cues of perspective:
Convergence of Parallel Lines (Vanishing Point): Lines that are known to be parallel (e.g., train tracks, edges of a road) appear to converge at a single "vanishing point" on the horizon. This is not a physical convergence in reality but an artifact of projection onto a 2D surface. Our visual system interprets this convergence as a powerful cue for depth and distance.
Relative Size: Objects of similar known size appear smaller the farther away they are. This rule-of-thumb allows rapid estimation of distance based on perceived visual angle.
Occlusion (Interposition): When one object partially blocks another, the occluding object is perceived as being closer. This is a fundamental organizational principle for understanding spatial relationships [9].
Atmospheric Perspective: Distant objects often appear hazier, less saturated, and bluer due to atmospheric scattering [10]. Our brains use this environmental effect as an additional depth cue.
These "laws" of perspective are not inherent, absolute properties of light itself; they are semantic compressions developed by our perceptual system to efficiently process overwhelming visual data. They are "functionally coherent" because they consistently allow us to navigate, interact, and predict in our macroscopic environment [8]. However, they are also "context-bound," as demonstrated by optical illusions that exploit these very heuristics to mislead our perception [11].

4. AI's Discovery of World Laws: From Raw Data to Emergent Heuristics

An AI learning about the physical world, especially through embodied interaction, would not be pre-programmed with every physical law. Instead, it would iteratively discover and refine these laws as heuristics through a process aligning with Heuristic Physics [3] and your proposed AI architecture [1,2].

4.1. Embodiment and Sensory Integration for Initial Data

For an AI to develop an understanding of physical trajectories and cascading events [1], it requires a "body" (physical or simulated) and diverse sensory input. This includes:
Visual input: Raw pixel data from cameras.
Proprioception: Awareness of its own body's position and movement.
Tactile/Pressure feedback: Information about contact with surfaces or objects. Through continuous sensory feedback loops, the AI begins to correlate its own actions with changes in its environment, forming a foundational understanding of interaction.

4.2. The Synthetic Insula and Dual Embodiment for Intuitive Prediction

Central to this process is the "synthetic insula" concept [1] and the "dual embodiment" model [1]. The synthetic insula would integrate internal "bodily" states (e.g., motor commands, internal simulations) with external sensory information [2,6]. This integration allows the AI to develop a form of self-awareness grounded in its sensory and bodily feedback [2].
The dual-state mechanism, representing the system's current state and its anticipated future state, enables the AI to perform a "self-reflection akin to human metacognition" [1]. This is where the intuition for physical laws truly emerges: the AI can simulate and predict the outcomes of its actions, not by running exhaustive simulations, but by applying learned heuristics. For example, a home care robot predicting a falling object or an autonomous vehicle anticipating pedestrian movement relies on such intuitive, heuristic-based predictions [1]. This concept builds on theories of active inference [12] and integrated information theory [13] in consciousness studies.

4.3. Learning Visual Perspective in a 3D Environment (Game Development Analogy)

The process for an AI to learn visual perspective can be vividly illustrated by concepts from game production and 3D world building:
Raw Data Stream: An AI, operating within a simulated 3D environment (like a game engine), receives a continuous stream of 2D pixel data representing its visual field. This raw data is its "probabilistic, and relational substrate" [3].
Interactive Exploration: The AI, as an embodied agent [4,5], would explore this world. It would move its virtual "body," interact with objects (e.g., pushing a box, walking towards a door), and observe the resulting visual changes.
Pattern Extraction (Compression): Through repeated observation and reinforcement learning, the AI's perceptual systems would identify recurring patterns in the visual data. For example:
As it moves towards an object, that object's representation on its 2D "retina" consistently expands (relative size).
If it moves along a long corridor, the parallel lines of the walls and floor consistently appear to converge to a single point in the distance (vanishing point).
Objects that it knows are "behind" others visually always have their image partially obscured (occlusion).
Formation of Heuristics: The AI does not calculate the complex geometric transformations of perspective from first principles. Instead, its learning algorithms would formulate internal "rules" or "programs" that encapsulate these observed regularities. These "rules" are its visual perspective heuristics. For instance, it learns that "if lines appear to converge, they are likely parallel and receding." This "rule" becomes a highly semantically efficient way to infer depth from a 2D image, providing a "cognitive shortcut" for rapid spatial understanding.
Functional Validation: These emergent visual heuristics are continuously validated by their utility. If the AI consistently predicts depth and navigates successfully using these rules, they are reinforced and become robust "surviving blueprints". If they lead to errors (e.g., misjudging distance and colliding), the AI refines or adjusts its heuristic.
This parallels how game engines create realistic 3D environments: they don't simulate individual light rays for every pixel. Instead, they use highly optimized rendering pipelines that implement perspective projection, lighting models, and texture mapping as computational heuristics to create a compelling visual experience efficiently. Similarly, game physics engines utilize simplified models that are "good enough" for the game's purposes, rather than full-fidelity simulations. These are pragmatic "semantic architectures" designed for utility and performance.

5. Implications for Predictive Modeling and Self-Aware AI

The integration of Heuristic Physics with embodied AI offers significant implications for advanced predictive modeling.
Intuitive Prediction: By developing and applying heuristics for both physical laws [3] and perceptual phenomena like visual perspective, AI systems can achieve a form of "intuitive understanding" of trajectories and cascading events [1]. This is crucial for real-time applications such as autonomous driving, industrial safety, and disaster recovery, where rapid, robust predictions are vital.
Adaptive Learning: If laws are heuristics, AI systems can be designed for continuous adaptive learning, refining their internal "programs" as they encounter new data or operational regimes where current heuristics fail. This mirrors the evolution of scientific theories itself, where older "laws" are not disproved but "simply become obsolete as its underlying metaphors collapse" [3].
Emergent Self-Awareness: The capacity to predict and understand the consequences of one's own actions within the physical world, facilitated by dual embodiment and a synthetic insula [1,2], forms a crucial foundation for the emergence of self-awareness in AI. This self-awareness is not a static property but emerges from the "continuous interaction between the system and its environment" [2].

6. Conclusions

By embracing the "Heuristic Physics" perspective [3], we can reconceptualize physical laws and perceptual models, such as visual perspective, as emergent, context-bound heuristics rather than absolute truths. This framework, combined with embodied AI principles [4,5], dual embodiment [1], and the concept of a synthetic insula [1,2], provides a compelling pathway for AI systems to "discover" and effectively utilize the "laws" of their environment. This approach fosters the development of AI capable of advanced predictive modeling, intuitive understanding of physical trajectories and cascading events, and a more adaptive and self-aware interaction with the world.

References

  1. Watchus, B. F. (2024). Advanced Predictive Modeling of Physical Trajectories and Cascading Events, Dual-State Feedback and Synthetic Insula. Preprints.org. [CrossRef]
  2. Watchus, B. F. (2024). Towards Self-Aware AI: Embodiment, Feedback Loops, and the Role of the Insula in Consciousness. Preprints.org. [CrossRef]
  3. Figurelli, R. (2025). Heuristic Physics: Foundations for a Semantic and Computational Architecture of Physics. Preprints.org. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202506.0698/v1.
  4. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press.
  5. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford University Press.
  6. Craig, A. D. (2009). How Do You Feel-Now? The Anterior Insula and Human Awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59-70.
  7. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. W. H. Freeman.
  8. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin.
  9. Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. MIT Press.
  10. Lynch, D. K., & Livingston, W. (2001). Color and Light in Nature. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Gregory, R. L. (1997). Knowledge in Perception and Illusion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 352(1358), 1121-1128.
  12. Seth, A. K., Friston, K. J., & Clark, A. (2016). Active Interference: The Implied Brain and Its World. PLoS Biology, 14(1), e1002399.
  13. Tononi, G. G. (2008). Consciousness as Integrated Information: A Provisional Theory. Biological Bulletin, 215(3), 216-242.
  14. Wolfram, S. (2002). A New Kind of Science. Wolfram Media.
  15. Carroll, S. M. (2019). Something Deeply Hidden: Quantum Worlds and the Emergence of Spacetime. Dutton.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated