Preprint
Essay

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Architectural Module in Ancient China: The Tianqi Hall of Yedi Village, Jincheng

Submitted:

16 June 2025

Posted:

17 June 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
The construction ruler (营造尺,Yingzao chi) for this hall is 320.6 mm. It adopts the system of large and small rulers that has been in practice since the Tang and Song dynasties. Each large ruler is divided into 10 cun(寸), which is equivalent to 12 small cun(小寸). It uses architectural modulus similar to modern ones. The basic module is 1 chi. Based on this, the macroscopic dimensions are determined and the proportion of the main body is controlled. Four small cun are used as the sub-module, which is one-third of the basic module. Half a chi, that is, six small cun, is also a sub-module of one chi. Based on this, the height of columns, the height of bracket sets, etc. are determined. 0.4 small cun are also a sub-module, which is one-thirtieth of the basic module. This is used to measure various components, such as dou (斗,square blocks), gong (栱,cross-shaped brackets), and fang (枋,horizontal bars).
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Overview and Existing Research

The Dai Temple(岱庙) is located in Yedi Village, Nancun Town, Zezhou County, Shanxi Province. Facing south, the temple is situated on a high ground in the west of the village. The terrain of the temple site is divided into three terraces. Along the central axis from south to north, the mountain gate(山门) and Yuzhao(鱼沼) Pond are on the first terrace. The wulou(舞楼,dance tower) is on the second terrace. The foundation of Tianqi(天齐) Hall serves as the third terrace. There are side halls, verandas, etc. built on both sides. In 2001, it was listed among the fifth batch of key cultural relics under national protection, with the cultural relic protection information spanning from the Song Dynasty to the Ming Dynasty.
Tianqi Hall is the main building of the temple. The inscription on the stone columns of the front eaves indicates that they were donated in the third year of the Yuanyou(元祐) reign of the Song Dynasty (1080 AD). There is an inscription on the blue stone doorframe of the front slot dating back to the 27th year of the Dading(大定) reign of the Jin Dynasty. Based on this, it can be inferred that this hall was built in the Song Dynasty and partially renovated in the Jin Dynasty (1187 AD).
Renovation started in November 2009 and was completed in May 2011. In 2019, the “Completion Report of the Renovation Project of Zezhou Dai Temple” was published, releasing relatively detailed survey and mapping drawings (SXZDGJ.2019). There is also one study on the artistic style among the research related to this hall(Li,Ym,.and Bl,Liu.2008).

2. Construction Ruler (营造尺, Yingzao Chi) and the Width of the Bay

As shown in Table 1, the Tong MianKuo( 通面阔,The sum of all the widths of the bays) is 10,900 mm, and the Tong Jinshen(通进深,The sum of all depths of the bays) is 10,260 mm. The difference between the two is 640 mm, approximately 2 chi. Usually, the width and depth are in integer chi or integer half-chi and are proportional. The ratio of the depth to the width is 0.9412 to 1, approximately 16 to 17. This non-canonical proportion suggests that the design must derive from integer ratios constrained by whole-chi measurements.
Some scholars have determined through research that the length of various Song Dynasty chi ranges from 280 mm to 370 mm (Lu,Jx,.and Gm,Qiu. 2001:370). Taking into account the contemporary existing buildings and regional factors, the length of the chi is restricted to the range of 280 mm to 329 mm. Within this range, there are six hypotheses. As shown in the table( Table 1), the depth of Tianqi Hall ranges from 32 chi to 36 chi, and the corresponding width is also in integer chi. From this, six lengths of the chi are calculated.
During the Tang Dynasty and subsequent dynasties, the system of short and long rulers was adopted. In the north, 100 millet grains(黍,Panicum miliaceum) were used to define a short ruler, and 120 millet grains made up a long ruler. The long ruler was the official and commonly used measuring tool, while the short ruler was employed for rituals, music, astronomy, and medical measurements. Among the 41 Tang Dynasty rulers collected in A History of Chinese Science and Technology: Weights and Measures, one was a short ruler and 40 were long rulers. Each ruler was divided into 10 grids. Apparently, the commonly used rulers were all long rulers, and they followed the decimal system. Each long ruler was 10 cun(寸), which was equivalent to 12 small cun(小寸). The length of a small cun was the length of 10 millet grains, and the length of the cun was the length of 12 millet grains (Lu,Jx,.and Gm,Qiu. 2001:318-326,353). This is quite similar to the relationship between inches and feet. This system has been widely applied in many other existing ancient structures. Therefore, when measuring this hall, the use of small cun should also be taken into consideration (Xu,Xg.2025a;Xx,Xg.2025b.).
As shown in the table( Table 2), the main data such as the width of the bay and the height of the column are also restricted by the construction chi. When comparing from three aspects: integer dimensions, proportions, and similarity ratios, Plan 1 is the most reasonable. Based on this, the fitted length of the construction chi is 320.6 mm. See the figure (Figure 1).
The construction ruler should not be only used for the main framework but also for other parts of the building. The following will be verified separately.

3. Cai(材,Similar to Dimension Lumber)

The cai data are listed in table( Table 3). The cai of the Neizhu Puzuo(内柱铺作,inner column bracket sets) are the same as those of the Waiyan Puzuo(外檐铺作,exterior eave bracket set), and they are obviously of the same specification.The width of the cai is 4.4 small cun, the Dang cai(单材,single-sized timbers) is 7.2 small cun, the qi(栔) is 2.8 small cun, and the Zucai(足材,the full-sized timbers) is 10 small cun. Obviously, cun is not the measurement method for cai, but small cun. By comparison, it can be seen that the measurement of cai is expanded in multiples of 0.4 small cun. Therefore, 0.4 small cun is the smallest measurement unit of cai.
In “Yingzao Fashi” (营造法式,the Song Dynasty’s building standard manual), there is the concept of “fen”(份,The absolute value varies with the grade of the “cai” and is one-tenth of the width of the “cai”.). “Fen” is a relative length and the smallest measurement unit of “cai”. This is a relative measurement method derived from the cross-sectional proportion of “cai”( Pan,G,.and Jz,He.2017). Borrowing the concept of “fen” in “Yingzao Fashi”, if we define 0.4 small cun as each “fen”, then the materials used for this palace can be described as follows: the width of “cai” is 11 fen, the “Dang cai” is 18 fen, the “qi” is 7 fen, and the “Zucai” is 25 fen..
As shown in table(Table 3), the cai used for the ridge purlin, each node of the upper and lower purlins, and the Timu(替木,cantilevered timbers) at each node can also be expressed in terms of fen. The cai used in these parts are similar to those of the exterior eave bracket sets. The width of the cai is basically 11 fen, while the height of the cai shows flexible minor variations.
The cross-section of beam-like components can also be constrained by fen. The Sichuanfu (四椽栿,5-purlin beam) is the thickest and strongest. Its diameter is 60 fen, which exactly equals 2 chi. The Pinglang(平梁,3-purlin beam), the Dingfu(丁栿,ding beam),and the Xitou fu(系头栿,side beam frame) are all round timbers. Their diameters range from 32 fen to 35 fen, approximately half of the diameter of the Sichuanfu . The Dajiaolain(大角梁,large corner beam) and the rufu(乳栿,beam tie) have rectangular cross-sections and are also constrained by fen values.
The width of the pu-pai-fang(普拍枋) is 30 fen, which is equivalent to 1 chi, and its height is 12 fen, equivalent to 4.8 small cun. The outer Laner(阑额, architrave) is larger than the inner Laner, and can also be constrained by fen values. These cai are slightly larger than the Zucai of the bracket sets.
There are Chuanfang(串枋,linking member) on the upper framework. This cai is a connecting component and does not bear weight, so it is the smallest. It is also set at 0.4 small cun.

4. Dou(斗,Bearing Block)

The data of dou are converted into cun and small cun. Comparatively speaking, taking 0.4 small cun as the smallest measurement unit is the most reasonable, as shown in table(Table 4). It can be divided into three categories according to size, as shown in figure(Figure 2).
The largest structural components are the neizhu ludou (内柱栌斗, inner column cap block) and waiyan ludou (外檐栌斗, eaves cap block) . Although there are slight differences in their external dimensions, they belong to the same category. The upper width is approximately 42 fen, equivalent to 16.8 small cun, and the height of the qi is 5.2 small cun.
There are ludou at three nodes: under the lower purlin, under the upper purlin, and at the ridge. They have little difference and similar shapes. The upper width of each is 32 fen, equivalent to 12.8 small cun, and the height of the qi is 10 to 11 fen.
The sizes of other dou are similar and are classified into the category of small dou. The sizes of this type of dou are slightly adjusted according to their positions. The upper width of the sandou(散斗,scattered block) on the outer eave columns is 19 fen, the upper width of the jiaohu dou(交互斗,connection block) is 22 fen, The upper width of the sandou at each node of the beam and purlins is 18 fen, and the height of the qi is mainly 7 fen.
On the basis of being divided into three major categories according to the size of the dou, the dimensions of each part of the dou vary slightly. Obviously, there are precision errors in the data in table(Table 4). Such errors include the manufacturing errors during the initial construction, as well as the later wind and rain erosion and surveying and mapping errors. However, beyond these errors, there are obvious differences in the design dimensions of the dou. The dou is not a standard, interchangeable part that is universally applicable. Instead, its size is determined according to the structural requirements. Only the size of the dou is relatively unified for the same type of structure and in the same type of position. Essentially, it is the result of being designed in units of 0.4 small cun.This is the result of being set according to the building modulus.

5. Gong (栱,Bracketarm)

The data of gong are listed in table(Table 5). According to the assembly relationship between gong and dou, the length of the center(栱心长,The center distance relevant to assembly) of gong can be deduced by subtracting the lower width of dou from the length of gong. The distance between the outer ends of the two dous above the gong is obtained by adding the upper width of a small dou to the length of the center. Each set of brackets is shown in Figure(Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 8).

5.1. Neizhu Puzuo

As shown in figure(Figure 4). The length of the nidao-gong (泥道栱,axial bracket arm) is 36 small cun. The bottom width of the sandou is 6 small cun. The length of the center is 30 small cun. There is only half of the nidao man-gong(泥道慢栱, second-layer axial bracket arm). The length of half of the nidao man-gong is 28 small cun, and the bottom of half of a sandou is 3 small cun. Thus, the length of the half nidao man-gong is 25 small cun. As shown in table(Table 5), the length of the tatou(榻头,The bracket arm of the inclined end under the beam) is 54 small cun.
The width of the narrowest bay of this hall is 120 small cun. There is no bujian-puzuo(补间铺作,bracket sets between columns) between the inner columns, and the length of the gong is not affected by the spacing and width of the sets of bracket arms. Therefore, the dimensions of these three components are all in integer small cun and It is also designed in integer ‘fens’.

5.2. Zhuanjiao-Puzuo(转角铺作,Bracket Set on Corner)

As shown in table and Figure(Table 5Figure 6). The zhuanjiao - puzuo has three inward jumps at a 45-degree angle. The lengths of the half gong are 22 small cun, 34 small cun, and 44 small cun respectively. Calculated based on the width of half the bottom of a small dou being 2.8 small cun, it can be deduced that the lengths from the center of the half gong are 19.2 small cun, 31.2 small cun, and 41.2 small cun. Judging from the data, the integer value of the small cun of the bracket length is prioritized here, and the length of the center of the gong is determined according to the size of the bottom of the dou.

5.3. Waiyan Puzuo

As shown in figures and table(Figure 3 and Figure 4 and Table 5). The Waiyan Puzuo are relatively complex, with multiple horizontal and vertical gong intersecting with each other. Constrained by the assembly relationship and also influenced by the bay width and the bujian-puzuo, they are crucial to the architectural image.
The length of the ling-gong( 令栱,regular arm) be 36 small cun, the length of the guazi-gong(瓜子栱,oval arm) be 33 small cun, A gong is carved on the body of the third layer of the fang. The length of the gong is 30 small cun. The lengths of these three horizontal arches are set in integer small cun, and the length of the central part is determined by the assembly relationship between the dou and the gong.
The length of the nidao-gong is 28 cun, and the length of the nidao man-gong is 44 cun. Different from before, the length of the gong conforms to an integer number of cun. But it is still an integer multiple of 0.4 small cun.
The outer jump length of the hua-gong (华栱,flower-shaped bracket arms) is 15.6 small cun, which is equivalent to 13 cun. The inner jump length is 14.4 small cun, which is equivalent to 12 cun. The length of the center of the hua-gong is 25 cun, which is equivalent to 30 small cun. This set of data gives priority to ensuring integer cun.
The total inner jump of the Shanmian Puzuo(山面铺作,eave bracket set on the gable side) is 24.8 small cun. The outer jump is 28 small cun. The sum of the inner and outer jumps is 52.8 small cun, which is equivalent to 44 cun. For this set of data, the target of 44 cun was first determined, and then each inner and outer node was divided. The measurement was completed in small cun.
Overall, in the design of the gong, efforts are made to ensure that the length of the gong or the length of the center is an integer number of cun or an integer number of small cun. When affected by the structure, it will follow the structure. However, all are integer multiples of 0.4 small cun.

6. The Parameters of the Puzuo (铺作,Bracket Set) and the Building

6.1. The Parameters of the Waiyan Puzuo

As shown in table and figures (Table 6 and Figure 3 and Figure 4), the cai and qi of each layer of the Waiyan Puzuoare clear. The total height of the pu-pai-fang and the ludou is 10 small cun. Above it, the three layers of Zucai measure 30 small cun. The height of the Timu is 155 mm, approximately 5.8 small cun. The diameter of the liao-yan-tuan(撩檐榑,eaves purlin) is 290 mm, approximately 10.8 small cun. However, since the liao-yan-tuan and the Timu need to be cut to form a mating surface, the actual height of the liao-yan-tuan is approximately 10.4 small cun, and the Timu is approximately 5.6 small cun. The combined height of the liao-yan-tuan and the Timu is approximately 16 small cun. Thus, from the bottom surface of the pu-pai-fang to the upper surface of the Timu of the bracket set, it is a total of 56 small cun, which is the height parameter.
The length of the nidao man-gong is 44 cun. The distance between the outer skins of the two dou on the arch is 54.8 small cun, and this is the widest part of the Puzuo.
The total length of the inner and outer jumps of the Shanmian Puzuo is 44 cun, with the outer jump being 28 small cun. These are the depth parameters of the Puzuo.

6.2. Neizhu Puzuo, Beams and Indoor Space

The Neizhu Puzuo is the structural intersection point of the longitudinal and transverse beams, and it is the key to the structure of the building. The cai and qi are stacked in layers as shown in figures(Figure 4 and Figure 7). The inner column is 14.8 small cun higher than the outer eaves column. The distance from the bottom of the front rufu(乳栿) to the bottom surface of the pu-pai-fang is 30 small cun, and the height of the flat column is 174 small cun. Then the height from the indoor floor level to the bottom surface of the front rufu is 204 small cun, which is equivalent to 17 chi. These are the main parameters of the indoor space.
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of the Shang Jia (Draw by oneself).
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of the Shang Jia (Draw by oneself).
Preprints 163892 g007
Figure 8. Front View Schematic Diagram (Draw by oneself).
Figure 8. Front View Schematic Diagram (Draw by oneself).
Preprints 163892 g008

7. Foundation of the Hall

The relevant data is shown in table(Table 6). The foundation of Tianqi Hall is rather special as it takes advantage of the terrain of the terrace. The front of the terrace foundation is about 1,685 mm high, which is approximately 64 small cun when converted, about at the same level as an adult’s head and shoulders. The left and right terrace foundations are connected with those of the east and west side halls to form an integrated whole, with only a height difference of 14 to 15 centimeters. The ground level behind the hall is higher than that in front of the hall. The rear terrace foundation is integrated with the ground, and the eave wall is built from the ground level behind the hall. There are no steps in the middle in front of the hall. On the left and right of the front terrace foundation, corner columns are erected as the boundaries of the terrace foundation. There are two sets of steps, one on the east and one on the west, outside the corner columns.
As shown in figure(Figure 1, Figure 8, and Figure 9). The width of the hall foundation is 568 small cun, and the depth of the hall foundation is 544 small cun. The height is 64 small cun.Neither of them is an integer number of cun, but both are multiples of 4 small cun.

8. Shang Jia (上架,Beam Frame)

The relevant data fitting is shown in table and figures(Table 7 and Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10).
Figure 9. Side View Schematic Diagram (Draw by oneself).
Figure 9. Side View Schematic Diagram (Draw by oneself).
Preprints 163892 g009

8.1. Ceyang (侧样,Lateral Structural Elevation)

The Tong Jinshen is 320 cun, which is equivalent to 384 small cun. The Length of the out-jump of the puzuo is 28 small cun. The horizontal distance from the ridge purlin to the upper purlin is 72 small cun. The horizontal distance from the lower purlin to the upper purlin is 72 small cun. The horizontal distance from the liao-yan-tuan(撩檐榑,eaves purlin) to the lower purlin is 76 small cun. They are all integer multiples of 4 small cun.

8.2. Zhengyang(正样,Principal Structural Framework)

The Tong MianKuo is 408 small cun. The Length of the out-jump of the puzuo is 28 small cun. The distance between the purlins at the eaves on the east and west sides is 464 small cun. Excluding the tile, taking the surface of the gable fascia board as the boundary, the length of the main ridge (between the chu-ji) is 420 small cun. When including the tile components, the estimated length of the main ridge is 432 small cun,equivalent to 360 cun. the chu-ji(出际,outward extension of the gable purlins)is 54 small cun.

9. Ju Zhe(举折,Raising the Purlin)

As shown in table ( Table 7 and Table 8). The total lift is 144 small cun. The result of the fitting is as shown in figures(Figure 11). By taking 13/15 of the total rise and connecting it to the upper surface of the liao-yan-tuan, the height of the upper purlin can be obtained. By taking 12/15 of the total rise and connecting it to the upper surface of the liao-yan-tuan, the height of the lower purlin can be known. The essence of this calculation method is proportional distribution.

10. External Shape Parameters

Roofing tiles, decorative ridge beasts and the like are exposed to the elements for a long time and are very likely to have been replaced in history. However, (Li,Ym,.and Bl,Liu.2008) mentions that more than 85% of the roofing tiles and ridge beasts on the roof are original items from the Song Dynasty. The renovation report contains more detailed records of the roofing tiles. The roofing tiles were severely damaged, with differences in age, specifications. During the maintenance, a large number of roofing tiles were replenished according to the old ones (SXZDGJ.2019: P34, 39, 47, 63, 64). Apparently, the roofing tiles are the most vulnerable part. Every time in history when maintenance was carried out, old tiles were replaced and new ones were added. However, if old and new tiles are used simultaneously during each maintenance, tiles of the same size or with little difference must be given priority, and the maintenance will also be carried out according to the original state of the roof. When the main framework of the building is the original one, the current state of the roof can still reflect the appearance of its initial construction..

10.1. Jiao Liang (角梁, Corner Rafter), Tao Shou (套兽, Mythical Beast Ornament at the End of the Corner Rafter) and Boundaries

As shown in table and figures(Table 9 and Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10).the Da Jiao liang( 大角梁,large corner beam) is placed at a 45-degree angle, with the Zi Jiaoliang (仔角梁,secondary corner beam) positioned above it. The beam ends are adorned with taoshou . The taoshou heads protrude from the column center at a 45-degree angle, with a horizontal length of 168 small cun, and a front-side horizontal length of 120 smal cun,Exactly 1 zhang(丈,a traditional Chinese unit of length, equal to 10 chi).
As illustrated in figures(Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10), the distance between the eastern and western taoshou heads is 648 small cun, equivalent to 5 zhang 4 chi, while the distance between the northern and southern taoshou heads is 624 small cun, equivalent to 5 zhang 2 chi .This is the boundary of the building and is very important for building layout, planning, and design.

10.2. Chiwen(鸱吻,Ridge-Swallowing Ornament)

As shown in table and figures(Table 9 and Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10), the net height of the chiwen is fitted to 88 small cun, the distance from the upper surface of the ridge purlin to the upper surface of the chiwen is fitted to 114 small cun, and the distance from the bottom of the platform base to the upper surface of the chiwen is 552 small cun, which is equivalent to 4 zhang and 6 chi. These are the height parameters of the building.

10.3. Main Parameters and Proportions

As shown in table and figures(Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10 and Table 10).This hall is 5 zhang and 2 chi deep from north to south, 5 zhang and 4 chi wide from east to west, and 4 zhang and 6 chi high. These are three parameters designed in integer chi, not classical proportions.
Excluding the tiles and the Bofengban(博风板,gable eave board) on the gable ends, the length of the main ridge is 420 small cun. Estimating that the overhang of the tile ends is 6 small cun, the length of the main ridge is then 432 small cun, which is equivalent to 3 zhang and 6 chi. The ratio of this length to the distance of 5 zhang and 4 chi between the east and west tao shouis 2:3.
The overall height of the Damuzuo (from the bottom surface of the column to the upper surface of the ridge purlin) is 374 small cun. The height from the bottom surface of the column to the upper surface of the liao-yan-tuan is 230 small cun. The ratio is 0.6149, which is the golden ratio of 8 to 13.

11. Conclusions

11.1. Construction Ruler

The construction ruler is 320.6 mm long. It conforms to the system of large and small rulers implemented since the Tang and Song Dynasties. The large ruler is the official ruler, the commonly used ruler in daily life, and also the construction ruler for this palace hall. One chi (Chinese foot) is equal to 10 cun, which is equivalent to 12 small cun.

11.2. Architectural Modulus

This palace hall adopts a series of modular systems.
The basic module is 1 chi. Based on this, the macroscopic dimensions of the building are determined, and the main body proportion is controlled.
4 small cun serves as a sub-module, which is one-third of the basic module. 6 small cun is equivalent to half a chi and is also a sub-module, which is one-half of the basic module. Based on these, the height of the palace foundation, the width and depth of the palace foundation, the height of the columns, the height of the bracket sets, the length of the purlin bays, chu-ji, etc. are set.
0.4 small cun is also a sub-module, which is one-thirtieth of the basic module. It is used for various small-sized components, such as the cross-sections of dou, gong , fang (枋,horizontal members), and beam elements.
This set of modular systems is different from the cai-fen system. Its basic theory is the same as that of modern architectural modular systems. (MOHURD.2013.)

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org.

References

  1. Lu,Jx,.and Gm,Qiu. 2001. History of Science and Technology in China.Vol.of Metrology. Beijing: Science Press.
  2. Li,Ym,.and Bl,Liu.2008. Analysis of the Architecture and Artistic Style of the Tianqi Hall in Yedi Temple, Jincheng. Cultural Relics World, no. 6: 50–54.
  3. MOHURD(Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China).2013. GB/T 50002 – 2013, Standard for modular coordination of building.
  4. Pan,G,.and Jz,He.2017. Interpretation of Yingzao Fashi.2rd ed.Nanjing: Southeast University Press.
  5. SXZDGJ(Shanxi Zhongde Ancient Architecture Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd).2019. Completion Report of the Renovation Project of Zezhou Dai Temple [泽州岱庙修缮工程峻工报告]. Taiyuan. Beiyue Literature and Art Publishing House.
  6. Xu,Xg.2025a.Ancient Chinese Architectural Modulus-Main Hall of the Erxian Temple at Jincheng Preprints. [CrossRef]
  7. Xu,Xg.2025b.中国古代建筑模数-平遥镇国寺万佛殿(ancient Chinese Architectural Modulus -Wanfo Hall in Zhenguo Temple,Pingyao) OSF Preprints. February 11. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the column grid arrangement on the Hall Foundation(Draw by oneself).
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the column grid arrangement on the Hall Foundation(Draw by oneself).
Preprints 163892 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of some dou (Draw by oneself).
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of some dou (Draw by oneself).
Preprints 163892 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of Waiyan Puzuo (Draw by oneself).
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of Waiyan Puzuo (Draw by oneself).
Preprints 163892 g003
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of Shanmian Puzuo (Draw by oneself).
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of Shanmian Puzuo (Draw by oneself).
Preprints 163892 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of zhuanjiao-puzuo (Draw by oneself).
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of zhuanjiao-puzuo (Draw by oneself).
Preprints 163892 g005
Figure 6. 45-degree sectional view of the zhuanjiao-puzuo (Draw by oneself).
Figure 6. 45-degree sectional view of the zhuanjiao-puzuo (Draw by oneself).
Preprints 163892 g006
Figure 10. Upward View Schematic Diagram (Draw by oneself).
Figure 10. Upward View Schematic Diagram (Draw by oneself).
Preprints 163892 g010
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of Ju Zhe(Raising the Purlin) (Draw by oneself).
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of Ju Zhe(Raising the Purlin) (Draw by oneself).
Preprints 163892 g011
Table 1. Six Hypothetical Lengths of the Chi (Construction Ruler).
Table 1. Six Hypothetical Lengths of the Chi (Construction Ruler).
Raw data Hypothesis 1 Hypothesis 2 Hypothesis 3 Hypothesis 4 Hypothesis 5 Hypothesis 6
mm Integer Chi Ancient Chi Length (mm) Integer Chi Ancient Chi Length (mm) Integer Chi Ancient Chi Length (mm) Integer Chi Ancient Chi Length (mm) Integer Chi Ancient Chi Length (mm) Integer Chi Ancient Chi Length (mm)
Tong Jinshen 10260 32 320.625 33 310.909 34 301.765 35 293.143 35.5 289.014 36 285.000
Tong MianKuo 10900 34 320.588 35 311.429 36 302.778 37 294.595 38 286.842 38.5 283.117
mean value 320.607 311.169 302.271 293.869 287.928 284.058
Table 2. Validation of Six Hypotheses.
Table 2. Validation of Six Hypotheses.
Hypothesis 1: 320.6 mm/Chi (Fitted)
Raw data Fitted Value
mm Convert tol cun cun small cun Multiples of 0.4 small cun Similarity rate
Tong Jinshen 10260 320.025 320 384 96 99.992%
Tong MianKuo 10900 339.988 340 408 102 100.004%
Column height 4640 144.729 145 174 43.5 100.188%
width of the central bay 4500 140.362 140 168 42 99.742%
width of the secondary bay 3200 99.813 100 120 30 100.188%
width of the secondary bay in depth 3210 100.125 100 120 30 99.875%
width of the central bay in depth 3840 119.775 120 144 36 99.998%
Difference between Bay Width and Depth 640 19.963 20 24 6 100.188%
Hypothesis 2: 311.2 mm/Chi (Fitted)
Raw data Fitted Value
mm Convert tol cun cun small cun Multiples of 0.4 small cun Similarity rate
Tong Jinshen 10260 329.692 330 396 99 100.094%
Tong MianKuo 10900 350.257 350 420 105 99.927%
Column height 4640 149.100 150 180 45 100.603%
width of the central bay 4500 144.602 145 174 43.5 100.276%
width of the secondary bay 3200 102.828 102.5 123 30.75 99.681%
width of the secondary bay in depth 3210 103.149 102.5 123 30.75 99.371%
width of the central bay in depth 3840 123.393 125 150 37.5 101.302%
Difference between Bay Width and Depth 640 20.566 20 24 6 97.250%
Hypothesis 3: 311.2 mm/Chi (Fitted)
Raw data Fitted Value
mm Convert tol cun cun small cun Multiples of 0.4 small cun Similarity rate
Tong Jinshen 10260 339.432 340 408 102 100.167%
Tong MianKuo 10900 360.605 360 432 108 99.832%
Column height 4640 153.505 155 186 46.5 100.974%
width of the central bay 4500 148.874 150 180 45 100.757%
width of the secondary bay 3200 105.866 105 126 31.5 99.182%
width of the secondary bay in depth 3210 106.196 105 126 31.5 98.873%
width of the central bay in depth 3840 127.039 130 156 39 102.331%
Difference between Bay Width and Depth 640 21.173 20 24 6 94.459%
Hypothesis 4: 293.87 mm/Chi (Fitted)
Raw data Fitted Value
mm Convert tol cun cun small cun Multiples of 0.4 small cun Similarity rate
Tong Jinshen 10260 349.134 350 420 105 100.248%
Tong MianKuo 10900 370.912 370 444 111 99.754%
Column height 4640 157.893 157.5 189 47.25 99.751%
width of the central bay 4500 153.129 152 182.4 45.6 99.263%
width of the secondary bay 3200 108.892 109 130.8 32.7 100.099%
width of the secondary bay in depth 3210 109.232 109 130.8 32.7 99.788%
width of the central bay in depth 3840 130.670 132 158.4 39.6 101.018%
Difference between Bay Width and Depth 640 21.778 20 24 6 91.834%
Hypothesis 5: 287.93 mm/Chi (Fitted)
Raw data Fitted Value
mm Convert tol cun cun small cun Multiples of 0.4 small cun Similarity rate
Tong Jinshen 10260 356.337 355 426 106.5 99.625%
Tong MianKuo 10900 378.564 380 456 114 100.379%
Column height 4640 161.150 160 192 48 99.286%
width of the central bay 4500 156.288 155 186 46.5 99.176%
width of the secondary bay 3200 111.138 112.5 135 33.75 101.225%
width of the secondary bay in depth 3210 111.485 112.5 135 33.75 100.910%
width of the central bay in depth 3840 133.366 130 156 39 97.476%
Difference between Bay Width and Depth 640 22.228 25 30 7.5 112.473%
Hypothesis 6: 284 mm/Chi (Fitted)
Raw data Fitted Value
mm Convert tol cun cun small cun Multiples of 0.4 small cun Similarity rate
Tong Jinshen 10260 361.268 360 432 108 99.649%
Tong MianKuo 10900 383.803 385 462 115.5 100.312%
Column height 4640 163.380 165 198 49.5 100.991%
width of the central bay 4500 158.451 160 192 48 100.978%
width of the secondary bay 3200 112.676 112.5 135 33.75 99.844%
width of the secondary bay in depth 3210 113.028 112.5 135 33.75 99.533%
width of the central bay in depth 3840 135.211 135 162 40.5 100.218%
Difference between Bay Width and Depth 640 22.535 25 30 7.5 110.938%
Table 3. Cai(Similar to dimension lumber).
Table 3. Cai(Similar to dimension lumber).
Each chi is 320.6 mm
Raw data Fitted Value
nn Convert to cun Convert to small cun small cun Convert to cun Multiples of 0.4 small cun Similarity rate
Puzuo widthofthecai 120 3.743 4.492 4.4 3.667 11 97.961%
heightofdangcai 195 6.082 7.299 7.2 6 18 98.646%
qi 75 2.339 2.807 2.8 2.333 7 99.742%
heightofZucai 270 8.422 10.106 10 8.333 25 98.951%
Ridge Purlin Joint widthofthecai 120 3.743 4.492 4.4 3.667 11 97.961%
heightofdangcai 185 5.770 6.925 6.8 5.667 17 98.202%
qi 75 2.339 2.807 2.8 2.333 7 99.742%
upper purlin Joint widthofthecai 120 3.743 4.492 4.4 3.667 11 97.961%
heightofdangcai 200 6.238 7.486 7.4 6.167 18.5 98.852%
qi 70 2.183 2.620 2.6 2.167 6.5 99.233%
heightofZucai 270 8.422 10.106 10 8.333 25 98.951%
lower purlin Joint widthofthecai 120 3.743 4.492 4.4 3.667 11 97.961%
heightofZucai 270 8.422 10.106 10 8.333 25 98.951%
heightofdangcai 170 5.303 6.363 6.4 5.333 16 100.580%
Sichuanfu (5-purlin beam) diameter 640 19.963 23.955 24 20 60 100.188%
Pinglang(平梁,3-purlin beam) diameter 340 10.605 12.726 12.8 10.667 32 100.580%
Dingfu(ding beam) diameter 360 11.229 13.475 13.6 11.333 34 100.930%
Xitou fu(,side beam frame) diameter 370 11.541 13.849 14 11.667 35 101.090%
rufu(beam tie) width 270 8.422 10.106 10 8.333 25 98.951%
height 410 12.789 15.346 15.2 12.667 38 99.047%
Da Jiao liang( large corner beam) height 310 9.669 11.603 11.6 9.667 29 99.972%
width 280 8.734 10.480 10.4 8.667 26 99.233%
Timu(cantilevered timbers) of Puzuo width 120 3.743 4.492 4.4 3.667 11 97.961%
height 155 4.835 5.802 5.8 4.833 14.5 99.972%
Timu of upper purlin width 120 3.743 4.492 4.4 3.667 11 97.961%
height 130 4.055 4.866 4.8 4 12 98.646%
Timu of lower purlin width 120 3.743 4.492 4.4 3.667 11 97.961%
height 135 4.211 5.053 5 4.167 12.5 98.951%
Timu of ridge Purlin width 120 3.743 4.492 4.4 3.667 11 97.961%
height 150 4.679 5.614 5.6 4.667 14 99.742%
pu-pai-fang width 320 9.981 11.978 12 10 30 100.188%
height 130 4.055 4.866 4.8 4 12 98.646%
outer Laner( architrave) width 165 5.147 6.176 6 5 15 97.152%
height 335 10.449 12.539 12.8 10.667 32 102.082%
inner Laner width 150 4.679 5.614 5.6 4.667 14 99.742%
height 290 9.046 10.855 10.8 9 27 99.497%
Chuanfang(linking member) of Xitou fu width 75 2.339 2.807 2.8 2.333 7 99.742%
height 170 5.303 6.363 6.4 5.333 16 100.580%
Chuanfang(linking member) of lower purlin Joint width 70 2.183 2.620 2.8 2.333 7 106.867%
height 170 5.303 6.363 6.4 5.333 16 100.580%
Chuanfang(linking member) of ridge Purlin Joint width 90 2.807 3.369 3.4 2.833 8.5 100.930%
height 230 7.174 8.609 8.6 7.167 21.5 99.897%
Table 4. dou (斗,square blocks).
Table 4. dou (斗,square blocks).
Each chi is 320.6 mm
waiyan ludou Upper width Lower width Upper depth Lower depth Er(耳) ping(平) dou-qi(欹) qi(栔) Total height
Raw data mm 460 350 430 320 105 50 90 140 245
cun 14.348 10.917 13.412 9.981 3.275 1.560 2.807 4.367 7.642
small cun 17.218 13.100 16.095 11.978 3.930 1.871 3.369 5.240 9.170
Fitted Value small cun 17.2 13.2 16 12 4 1.8 3.4 5.2 9.2
cun 14.333 11 13.333 10 3.333 1.5 2.833 4.333 7.667
fen 43 33 40 30 10 4.5 8.5 13 23
Similarity rate 99.897% 100.760% 99.411% 100.188% 101.778% 96.180% 100.930% 99.233% 100.324%
waiyan sandou Upper width Lower width Upper depth Lower depth Er(耳) ping(平) dou-qi(欹) qi(栔) Total height
Raw data mm 200 140 205 150 50 25 50 75 125
cun 6.238 4.367 6.394 4.679 1.560 0.780 1.560 2.339 3.899
small cun 7.486 5.240 7.673 5.614 1.871 0.936 1.871 2.807 4.679
Fitted Value small cun 7.6 5.6 7.6 5.6 2 0.8 2 2.8 4.8
cun 6.333 4.667 6.333 4.667 1.667 0.667 1.667 2.333 4
fen 19 14 19 14 5 2 5 7 12
Similarity rate 101.523% 106.867% 99.047% 99.742% 106.867% 85.493% 106.867% 99.742% 102.592%
waiyan jiaohu dou Upper width Lower width Upper depth Lower depth Er(耳) ping(平) dou-qi(欹) qi(栔) Total height
Raw data mm 240 180 205 150 50 25 50 75 125
cun 7.486 5.614 6.394 4.679 1.560 0.780 1.560 2.339 3.899
small cun 8.983 6.737 7.673 5.614 1.871 0.936 1.871 2.807 4.679
Fitted Value small cun 8.8 6.8 7.6 5.6 2 0.8 2 2.8 4.8
cun 7.333 5.667 6.333 4.667 1.667 0.667 1.667 2.333 4
fen 22 17 19 14 5 2 5 7 12
Similarity rate 97.961% 100.930% 99.047% 99.742% 106.867% 85.493% 106.867% 99.742% 102.592%
neizhu ludou Upper width Lower width Upper depth Lower depth Er(耳) ping(平) dou-qi(欹) qi(栔) Total height
Raw data mm 450 340 425 325 105 50 90 140 245
cun 14.036 10.605 13.256 10.137 3.275 1.560 2.807 4.367 7.642
small cun 16.843 12.726 15.908 12.165 3.930 1.871 3.369 5.240 9.170
Fitted Value small cun 16.8 12.8 16 12 4 1.8 3.4 5.2 9.2
cun 14.000 10.667 13.333 10.000 3.333 1.500 2.833 4.333 7.667
fen 42 32 40 30 10 4.5 8.5 13 23
Similarity rate 99.742% 100.580% 100.580% 98.646% 101.778% 96.180% 100.930% 99.233% 100.324%
ridge purlin ludou Upper width Lower width Upper depth Lower depth Er(耳) ping(平) dou-qi(欹) qi(栔) Total height
Raw data mm 335 265 285 200 85 40 75 115 200
cun 10.449 8.266 8.890 6.238 2.651 1.248 2.339 3.587 6.238
small cun 12.539 9.919 10.667 7.486 3.182 1.497 2.807 4.304 7.486
Fitted Value small cun 12.8 10 10.8 7.6 3.2 1.6 2.8 4.4 7.4
cun 10.667 8.333 9.000 6.333 2.667 1.333 2.333 3.667 6.167
fen 32 25 27 19 8 4 7 11 18.5
Similarity rate 102.082% 100.818% 101.242% 101.523% 100.580% 106.867% 99.742% 102.220% 98.852%
upper purlin ludou Upper width Lower width Upper depth Lower depth Er(耳) ping(平) dou-qi(欹) qi(栔) Total height
Raw data mm 345 260 325 250 85 35 70 105 190
cun 10.761 8.110 10.137 7.798 2.651 1.092 2.183 3.275 5.926
small cun 12.913 9.732 12.165 9.357 3.182 1.310 2.620 3.930 7.112
Fitted Value small cun 12.8 9.6 12 9.6 3.2 1.2 2.8 4 7.2
cun 10.667 8 10 8 2.667 1 2.333 3.333 6
fen 32 24 30 24 8 3 7 10 18
Similarity rate 99.123% 98.646% 98.646% 102.592% 100.580% 91.600% 106.867% 101.778% 101.242%
lower purlin ludou Upper width Lower width Upper depth Lower depth Er(耳) ping(平) dou-qi(欹) qi(栔) Total height
Raw data mm 350 255 330 235 65 45 75 120 185
cun 10.917 7.954 10.293 7.330 2.027 1.404 2.339 3.743 5.770
small cun 13.100 9.545 12.352 8.796 2.433 1.684 2.807 4.492 6.925
Fitted Value small cun 12.8 9.6 12.4 8.8 2.4 1.6 2.8 4.4 6.8
cun 10.667 8.000 10.333 7.333 2.000 1.333 2.333 3.667 5.667
fen 32 24 31 22 6 4 7 11 17
Similarity rate 97.707% 100.580% 100.390% 100.045% 98.646% 94.993% 99.742% 97.961% 98.202%
lower purlin sandou Upper width Lower width Upper depth Lower depth Er(耳) ping(平) dou-qi(欹) qi(栔) Total height
Raw data mm 190 135 205 165 40 30 45 75 115
cun 5.926 4.211 6.394 5.147 1.248 0.936 1.404 2.339 3.587
small cun 7.112 5.053 7.673 6.176 1.497 1.123 1.684 2.807 4.304
Fitted Value small cun 7.2 5.2 7.6 6 1.6 1.2 1.6 2.8 4.4
cun 6.000 4.333 6.333 5.000 1.333 1.000 1.333 2.333 3.667
fen 18 13 19 15 4 3 4 7 11
Similarity rate 101.242% 102.909% 99.047% 97.152% 106.867% 106.867% 94.993% 99.742% 102.220%
upper purlin sandou Upper width Lower width Upper depth Lower depth Er(耳) ping(平) dou-qi(欹) qi(栔) Total height
Raw data mm 195 150 205 155 40 35 70 105 145
cun 6.082 4.679 6.394 4.835 1.248 1.092 2.183 3.275 4.523
small cun 7.299 5.614 7.673 5.802 1.497 1.310 2.620 3.930 5.427
Fitted Value small cun 7.2 5.6 7.6 6 1.6 1.2 2.8 4 5.6
cun 6.000 4.667 6.333 5.000 1.333 1.000 2.333 3.333 4.667
fen 18 14 19 15 4 3 7 10 14
Similarity rate 98.646% 99.742% 99.047% 103.419% 106.867% 91.600% 106.867% 101.778% 103.182%
lower purlin sandou Upper width Lower width Upper depth Lower depth Er(耳) ping(平) dou-qi(欹) qi(栔) Total height
Raw data mm 190 135 190 135 45 25 45 70 115
cun 5.926 4.211 5.926 4.211 1.404 0.780 1.404 2.183 3.587
small cun 7.112 5.053 7.112 5.053 1.684 0.936 1.684 2.620 4.304
Fitted Value small cun 7.2 5.2 7.2 5.2 1.6 1.2 1.6 2.8 4.4
cun 6.000 4.333 6.000 4.333 1.333 1.000 1.333 2.333 3.667
fen 18 13 18 13 4 3 4 7 11
Similarity rate 101.242% 102.909% 101.242% 102.909% 94.993% 128.240% 94.993% 106.867% 102.220%
neizhu sandou Upper width Lower width Upper depth Lower depth Er(耳) ping(平) dou-qi(欹) qi(栔) Total height
Raw data mm 210 160 210 160 50 25 50 75 125
cun 6.550 4.991 6.550 4.991 1.560 0.780 1.560 2.339 3.899
small cun 7.860 5.989 7.860 5.989 1.871 0.936 1.871 2.807 4.679
Fitted Value small cun 7.6 6 7.6 6 2 0.8 2 2.8 4.8
cun 6.333 5.000 6.333 5.000 1.667 0.667 1.667 2.333 4.000
fen 19 15 19 15 5 2 5 7 12
Similarity rate 96.689% 100.188% 96.689% 100.188% 106.867% 85.493% 106.867% 99.742% 102.592%
Table 5. length of gong and center(The center distance relevant to assembly).
Table 5. length of gong and center(The center distance relevant to assembly).
Each chi is 320.6 mm
Raw data Fitted Value lower width of dou length of the center/or half of center
nn Convert to cun Convert to small cun small cun Convert to cun Multiples of 0.4 small cun Similarity rate small cun small cun Multiples of 0.4 small cun Convert to cun
waiyan puzuo nidao-gong 900 28.072 33.687 33.6 28 84 99.742% 5.6 28 70 23.333
nidao man-gong 1400 43.668 52.402 52.8 44 132 100.760% 5.6 47.2 118 39.333
gong is carved into the third-tier fang (horizontal timber) 800 24.953 29.944 30 25 75 100.188% 5.6 24.4 61 20.333
guazi-gong 880 27.449 32.938 33 27.5 82.5 100.188% 5.6 27.4 68.5 22.833
ling-gong 960 29.944 35.933 36 30 90 100.188% 5.6 30.4 76 25.333
outer jump length of the hua-gong 410 12.789 15.346 15.6 13 39 101.654%
inner jump length of the hua-gong 385 12.009 14.410 14.4 12 36 99.927%
Second jump 330 10.293 12.352 12.4 10.333 31 100.390%
total inner and outer jump length of waiyan puzuo 1125 35.090 42.109 42.4 35.333 106 100.692%
outer jump length of waiyan puzuo 740 23.082 27.698 28 23.333 70 101.090%
shanmian Puzuo outer jump length ofshanmian puzuo 740 23.082 27.698 28 23.333 70 101.090%
first inner jump length 385 12.009 14.410 14.4 12 36 99.927%
Second inner jump length 280 8.734 10.480 10.4 8.667 26 99.233%
total inner jump length 665 20.742 24.891 24.8 20.667 62 99.635%
total inner and outer jump length of shanmian Puzuo 1405 43.824 52.589 52.8 44 132 100.401%
three-layer gong of the inner jump of the zhuanjiao-puzuo first laye 585 18.247 21.896 22 18.333 55 100.473% 2.8 19.2 48 16
second layer 895 27.916 33.500 34 28.333 85 101.493% 2.8 31.2 78 26
third layer 1175 36.650 43.980 44 36.667 110 100.045% 2.8 41.2 103 34.333
Neizhu Puzuo nidao-gong 960 29.944 35.933 36 30 90 100.188% 6 30 75 25
nidao man-gong(half) 745 23.238 27.885 28 23.333 70 100.412% 3 25 62.5 20.833
tatou 1435 44.760 53.712 54 45 135 100.537%
Table 6. Foundation and height of Puzuo.
Table 6. Foundation and height of Puzuo.
Each chi is 320.6 mm
Raw data Fitted Value
nn Convert to cun Convert to small cun small cun Convert to cun Multiples of 0.4 small cun Similarity rate
Foundation of the Hall Height 1685 52.558 63.069 64 53.333 160 101.476%
Width 15240 475.359 570.430 568 473.333 1420 99.574%
From the left and right edges of the platform base to the column center 2150 67.062 80.474 80 66.667 200 99.411%
From the front edge of the platform base to the column center 2140 66.750 80.100 80 66.667 200 99.875%
Theoretical depth 544 453.333 1360 calculate
tiered component heights of puzuo pu-pai-fang 130 4.055 4.866 4.8 4 12 98.646%
ludou 140 4.367 5.240 5.2 4.333 13 99.233%
three zucai 810 25.265 30.318 30 25 75 98.951%
Timu 155 4.835 5.802 5.6 4.667 14 96.525%
diameter of the liao-yan-tuan 290 9.046 10.855 10.4 8.667 26 95.811%
Total height 1525 47.567 57.080 56 46.667 140 98.107%
liao-yan-tuan and Timu 19.2 16 48 估算
Table 7. Shang Jia (上架,Beam Frame).
Table 7. Shang Jia (上架,Beam Frame).
Each chi is 320.6 mm
Raw data Fitted Value
nn Convert to cun Convert to small cun small cun Convert to cun Multiples of 0.4 small cun Similarity rate
Ceyang (Lateral structural elevation) horizontal distance from ridge purlin to upper purlin 1920 59.888 71.865 72 60 180 100.188%
horizontal distance from lower purlin to upper purlin 1900 59.264 71.117 72 60 180 101.242%
horizontal distance from liao-yan-tuan to lower purlin 2050 63.943 76.731 76 63.333 190 99.047%
Length of out-jump of puzuo 740 23.082 27.698 28 23.333 70 101.090%
istance between front/rear liao-yan-tuan 11740 366.188 439.426 440 366.667 1100 100.131%
Zhengyang(Principal structural framework) distance between the Xitou fu and the Pinglang 1890 58.952 70.742 72 60 180 101.778%
distance between two xitoufu 8280 258.266 309.919 312 260 780 100.671%
chu-ji 1480 46.163 55.396 54 45 135 97.480%
main ridge(Not including roof tiles) 11240 350.593 420.711 420 350 1050 99.831%
istance between left / right liao-yan-tuan 12380 386.151 463.381 464 386.667 1160 100.134%
height from liao-yan-tuan to lower purlin 1060 33.063 39.676 40 33.333 100 100.818%
from lower purlin to upper purlin 1170 36.494 43.793 44 36.667 110 100.473%
from ridge purlin to upper purlin 1600 49.906 59.888 60 50 150 100.188%
total lift 3830 119.464 143.356 144 120 360 100.449%
Table 8. raising the purlin(ju zhe).
Table 8. raising the purlin(ju zhe).
Unit: small cun
horizontal distance vertical distance slope
from ridge purlin to upper purlin 72 60 5/6
from lower purlin to upper purlin 72 44 11/18
from liao-yan-tuan to lower purlin 76 40 10/19
Table 9. Height and Boundary.
Table 9. Height and Boundary.
Each chi is 320.6 mm
Raw data Fitted Value
nn Convert to cun Convert to small cun small cun Convert to cun Multiples of 0.4 small cun Similarity rate
Height Foundation of the Hal 1685 52.558 63.069 64 53.333 160 101.476%
Column 4640 144.729 173.674 174 145 435 100.188%
puzuo 1525 47.567 57.080 56 46.667 140 98.107%
From liao-yan-tuan to ridge purlin 3830 119.464 143.356 144 120 360 100.449%
From ridge purlin to upper skin of Chiwen 3040 94.822 113.787 114 95 285 100.188%
From Hall Foundation Base to Chiwen Ornament Upper Surface 14720 459.139 550.967 552 460 1380 100.188%
From the upper surface of the hall plinth to the upper surface of the ridge purlin 9995 311.759 374.111 374 311.667 935 99.970%
Chiwen 2350 73.300 87.960 88 73.333 220 100.045%
Boundary From taoshou Head to Column Center 3186 99.361 119.233 120 100 300 100.643%
distance between the eastern and western taoshou heads 17271 538.710 646.452 648 540 1620 100.240%
distance between the northern and southern taoshou heads 16631 518.747 622.497 624 520 1560 100.242%
Table 10. Main Parameters.
Table 10. Main Parameters.
cun small cun Multiples of 0.4 small cun
distance between the eastern and western taoshou heads 540 648 162
distance between the northern and southern taoshou heads 520 624 156
Total height 460 552 138
length of main ridge 360 432 108
From the upper surface of the hall plinth to the upper surface of the ridge purlin 311.667 374 93.5
height from the bottom surface of the column to the upper surface of the liao-yan-tuan 191.667 230 57.5
height of column 145 174 43.5
height from the indoor floor level to the bottom surface of the front rufu 170 204 51
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated