Submitted:
16 June 2025
Posted:
17 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Overview and Existing Research
2. Construction Ruler (营造尺, Yingzao Chi) and the Width of the Bay
3. Cai(材,Similar to Dimension Lumber)
4. Dou(斗,Bearing Block)
5. Gong (栱,Bracketarm)
5.1. Neizhu Puzuo
5.2. Zhuanjiao-Puzuo(转角铺作,Bracket Set on Corner)
5.3. Waiyan Puzuo
6. The Parameters of the Puzuo (铺作,Bracket Set) and the Building
6.1. The Parameters of the Waiyan Puzuo
6.2. Neizhu Puzuo, Beams and Indoor Space


7. Foundation of the Hall
8. Shang Jia (上架,Beam Frame)

8.1. Ceyang (侧样,Lateral Structural Elevation)
8.2. Zhengyang(正样,Principal Structural Framework)
9. Ju Zhe(举折,Raising the Purlin)
10. External Shape Parameters
10.1. Jiao Liang (角梁, Corner Rafter), Tao Shou (套兽, Mythical Beast Ornament at the End of the Corner Rafter) and Boundaries
10.2. Chiwen(鸱吻,Ridge-Swallowing Ornament)
10.3. Main Parameters and Proportions
11. Conclusions
11.1. Construction Ruler
11.2. Architectural Modulus
Supplementary Materials
References
- Lu,Jx,.and Gm,Qiu. 2001. History of Science and Technology in China.Vol.of Metrology. Beijing: Science Press.
- Li,Ym,.and Bl,Liu.2008. Analysis of the Architecture and Artistic Style of the Tianqi Hall in Yedi Temple, Jincheng. Cultural Relics World, no. 6: 50–54.
- MOHURD(Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China).2013. GB/T 50002 – 2013, Standard for modular coordination of building.
- Pan,G,.and Jz,He.2017. Interpretation of Yingzao Fashi.2rd ed.Nanjing: Southeast University Press.
- SXZDGJ(Shanxi Zhongde Ancient Architecture Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd).2019. Completion Report of the Renovation Project of Zezhou Dai Temple [泽州岱庙修缮工程峻工报告]. Taiyuan. Beiyue Literature and Art Publishing House.
- Xu,Xg.2025a.Ancient Chinese Architectural Modulus-Main Hall of the Erxian Temple at Jincheng Preprints. [CrossRef]
- Xu,Xg.2025b.中国古代建筑模数-平遥镇国寺万佛殿(ancient Chinese Architectural Modulus -Wanfo Hall in Zhenguo Temple,Pingyao) OSF Preprints. February 11. [CrossRef]








| Raw data | Hypothesis 1 | Hypothesis 2 | Hypothesis 3 | Hypothesis 4 | Hypothesis 5 | Hypothesis 6 | |||||||
| mm | Integer Chi | Ancient Chi Length (mm) | Integer Chi | Ancient Chi Length (mm) | Integer Chi | Ancient Chi Length (mm) | Integer Chi | Ancient Chi Length (mm) | Integer Chi | Ancient Chi Length (mm) | Integer Chi | Ancient Chi Length (mm) | |
| Tong Jinshen | 10260 | 32 | 320.625 | 33 | 310.909 | 34 | 301.765 | 35 | 293.143 | 35.5 | 289.014 | 36 | 285.000 |
| Tong MianKuo | 10900 | 34 | 320.588 | 35 | 311.429 | 36 | 302.778 | 37 | 294.595 | 38 | 286.842 | 38.5 | 283.117 |
| mean value | 320.607 | 311.169 | 302.271 | 293.869 | 287.928 | 284.058 | |||||||
| Hypothesis 1: 320.6 mm/Chi (Fitted) | ||||||
| Raw data | Fitted Value | |||||
| mm | Convert tol cun | cun | small cun | Multiples of 0.4 small cun | Similarity rate | |
| Tong Jinshen | 10260 | 320.025 | 320 | 384 | 96 | 99.992% |
| Tong MianKuo | 10900 | 339.988 | 340 | 408 | 102 | 100.004% |
| Column height | 4640 | 144.729 | 145 | 174 | 43.5 | 100.188% |
| width of the central bay | 4500 | 140.362 | 140 | 168 | 42 | 99.742% |
| width of the secondary bay | 3200 | 99.813 | 100 | 120 | 30 | 100.188% |
| width of the secondary bay in depth | 3210 | 100.125 | 100 | 120 | 30 | 99.875% |
| width of the central bay in depth | 3840 | 119.775 | 120 | 144 | 36 | 99.998% |
| Difference between Bay Width and Depth | 640 | 19.963 | 20 | 24 | 6 | 100.188% |
| Hypothesis 2: 311.2 mm/Chi (Fitted) | ||||||
| Raw data | Fitted Value | |||||
| mm | Convert tol cun | cun | small cun | Multiples of 0.4 small cun | Similarity rate | |
| Tong Jinshen | 10260 | 329.692 | 330 | 396 | 99 | 100.094% |
| Tong MianKuo | 10900 | 350.257 | 350 | 420 | 105 | 99.927% |
| Column height | 4640 | 149.100 | 150 | 180 | 45 | 100.603% |
| width of the central bay | 4500 | 144.602 | 145 | 174 | 43.5 | 100.276% |
| width of the secondary bay | 3200 | 102.828 | 102.5 | 123 | 30.75 | 99.681% |
| width of the secondary bay in depth | 3210 | 103.149 | 102.5 | 123 | 30.75 | 99.371% |
| width of the central bay in depth | 3840 | 123.393 | 125 | 150 | 37.5 | 101.302% |
| Difference between Bay Width and Depth | 640 | 20.566 | 20 | 24 | 6 | 97.250% |
| Hypothesis 3: 311.2 mm/Chi (Fitted) | ||||||
| Raw data | Fitted Value | |||||
| mm | Convert tol cun | cun | small cun | Multiples of 0.4 small cun | Similarity rate | |
| Tong Jinshen | 10260 | 339.432 | 340 | 408 | 102 | 100.167% |
| Tong MianKuo | 10900 | 360.605 | 360 | 432 | 108 | 99.832% |
| Column height | 4640 | 153.505 | 155 | 186 | 46.5 | 100.974% |
| width of the central bay | 4500 | 148.874 | 150 | 180 | 45 | 100.757% |
| width of the secondary bay | 3200 | 105.866 | 105 | 126 | 31.5 | 99.182% |
| width of the secondary bay in depth | 3210 | 106.196 | 105 | 126 | 31.5 | 98.873% |
| width of the central bay in depth | 3840 | 127.039 | 130 | 156 | 39 | 102.331% |
| Difference between Bay Width and Depth | 640 | 21.173 | 20 | 24 | 6 | 94.459% |
| Hypothesis 4: 293.87 mm/Chi (Fitted) | ||||||
| Raw data | Fitted Value | |||||
| mm | Convert tol cun | cun | small cun | Multiples of 0.4 small cun | Similarity rate | |
| Tong Jinshen | 10260 | 349.134 | 350 | 420 | 105 | 100.248% |
| Tong MianKuo | 10900 | 370.912 | 370 | 444 | 111 | 99.754% |
| Column height | 4640 | 157.893 | 157.5 | 189 | 47.25 | 99.751% |
| width of the central bay | 4500 | 153.129 | 152 | 182.4 | 45.6 | 99.263% |
| width of the secondary bay | 3200 | 108.892 | 109 | 130.8 | 32.7 | 100.099% |
| width of the secondary bay in depth | 3210 | 109.232 | 109 | 130.8 | 32.7 | 99.788% |
| width of the central bay in depth | 3840 | 130.670 | 132 | 158.4 | 39.6 | 101.018% |
| Difference between Bay Width and Depth | 640 | 21.778 | 20 | 24 | 6 | 91.834% |
| Hypothesis 5: 287.93 mm/Chi (Fitted) | ||||||
| Raw data | Fitted Value | |||||
| mm | Convert tol cun | cun | small cun | Multiples of 0.4 small cun | Similarity rate | |
| Tong Jinshen | 10260 | 356.337 | 355 | 426 | 106.5 | 99.625% |
| Tong MianKuo | 10900 | 378.564 | 380 | 456 | 114 | 100.379% |
| Column height | 4640 | 161.150 | 160 | 192 | 48 | 99.286% |
| width of the central bay | 4500 | 156.288 | 155 | 186 | 46.5 | 99.176% |
| width of the secondary bay | 3200 | 111.138 | 112.5 | 135 | 33.75 | 101.225% |
| width of the secondary bay in depth | 3210 | 111.485 | 112.5 | 135 | 33.75 | 100.910% |
| width of the central bay in depth | 3840 | 133.366 | 130 | 156 | 39 | 97.476% |
| Difference between Bay Width and Depth | 640 | 22.228 | 25 | 30 | 7.5 | 112.473% |
| Hypothesis 6: 284 mm/Chi (Fitted) | ||||||
| Raw data | Fitted Value | |||||
| mm | Convert tol cun | cun | small cun | Multiples of 0.4 small cun | Similarity rate | |
| Tong Jinshen | 10260 | 361.268 | 360 | 432 | 108 | 99.649% |
| Tong MianKuo | 10900 | 383.803 | 385 | 462 | 115.5 | 100.312% |
| Column height | 4640 | 163.380 | 165 | 198 | 49.5 | 100.991% |
| width of the central bay | 4500 | 158.451 | 160 | 192 | 48 | 100.978% |
| width of the secondary bay | 3200 | 112.676 | 112.5 | 135 | 33.75 | 99.844% |
| width of the secondary bay in depth | 3210 | 113.028 | 112.5 | 135 | 33.75 | 99.533% |
| width of the central bay in depth | 3840 | 135.211 | 135 | 162 | 40.5 | 100.218% |
| Difference between Bay Width and Depth | 640 | 22.535 | 25 | 30 | 7.5 | 110.938% |
| Each chi is 320.6 mm | ||||||||
| Raw data | Fitted Value | |||||||
| nn | Convert to cun | Convert to small cun | small cun | Convert to cun | Multiples of 0.4 small cun | Similarity rate | ||
| Puzuo | widthofthecai | 120 | 3.743 | 4.492 | 4.4 | 3.667 | 11 | 97.961% |
| heightofdangcai | 195 | 6.082 | 7.299 | 7.2 | 6 | 18 | 98.646% | |
| qi | 75 | 2.339 | 2.807 | 2.8 | 2.333 | 7 | 99.742% | |
| heightofZucai | 270 | 8.422 | 10.106 | 10 | 8.333 | 25 | 98.951% | |
| Ridge Purlin Joint | widthofthecai | 120 | 3.743 | 4.492 | 4.4 | 3.667 | 11 | 97.961% |
| heightofdangcai | 185 | 5.770 | 6.925 | 6.8 | 5.667 | 17 | 98.202% | |
| qi | 75 | 2.339 | 2.807 | 2.8 | 2.333 | 7 | 99.742% | |
| upper purlin Joint | widthofthecai | 120 | 3.743 | 4.492 | 4.4 | 3.667 | 11 | 97.961% |
| heightofdangcai | 200 | 6.238 | 7.486 | 7.4 | 6.167 | 18.5 | 98.852% | |
| qi | 70 | 2.183 | 2.620 | 2.6 | 2.167 | 6.5 | 99.233% | |
| heightofZucai | 270 | 8.422 | 10.106 | 10 | 8.333 | 25 | 98.951% | |
| lower purlin Joint | widthofthecai | 120 | 3.743 | 4.492 | 4.4 | 3.667 | 11 | 97.961% |
| heightofZucai | 270 | 8.422 | 10.106 | 10 | 8.333 | 25 | 98.951% | |
| heightofdangcai | 170 | 5.303 | 6.363 | 6.4 | 5.333 | 16 | 100.580% | |
| Sichuanfu (5-purlin beam) | diameter | 640 | 19.963 | 23.955 | 24 | 20 | 60 | 100.188% |
| Pinglang(平梁,3-purlin beam) | diameter | 340 | 10.605 | 12.726 | 12.8 | 10.667 | 32 | 100.580% |
| Dingfu(ding beam) | diameter | 360 | 11.229 | 13.475 | 13.6 | 11.333 | 34 | 100.930% |
| Xitou fu(,side beam frame) | diameter | 370 | 11.541 | 13.849 | 14 | 11.667 | 35 | 101.090% |
| rufu(beam tie) | width | 270 | 8.422 | 10.106 | 10 | 8.333 | 25 | 98.951% |
| height | 410 | 12.789 | 15.346 | 15.2 | 12.667 | 38 | 99.047% | |
| Da Jiao liang( large corner beam) | height | 310 | 9.669 | 11.603 | 11.6 | 9.667 | 29 | 99.972% |
| width | 280 | 8.734 | 10.480 | 10.4 | 8.667 | 26 | 99.233% | |
| Timu(cantilevered timbers) of Puzuo | width | 120 | 3.743 | 4.492 | 4.4 | 3.667 | 11 | 97.961% |
| height | 155 | 4.835 | 5.802 | 5.8 | 4.833 | 14.5 | 99.972% | |
| Timu of upper purlin | width | 120 | 3.743 | 4.492 | 4.4 | 3.667 | 11 | 97.961% |
| height | 130 | 4.055 | 4.866 | 4.8 | 4 | 12 | 98.646% | |
| Timu of lower purlin | width | 120 | 3.743 | 4.492 | 4.4 | 3.667 | 11 | 97.961% |
| height | 135 | 4.211 | 5.053 | 5 | 4.167 | 12.5 | 98.951% | |
| Timu of ridge Purlin | width | 120 | 3.743 | 4.492 | 4.4 | 3.667 | 11 | 97.961% |
| height | 150 | 4.679 | 5.614 | 5.6 | 4.667 | 14 | 99.742% | |
| pu-pai-fang | width | 320 | 9.981 | 11.978 | 12 | 10 | 30 | 100.188% |
| height | 130 | 4.055 | 4.866 | 4.8 | 4 | 12 | 98.646% | |
| outer Laner( architrave) | width | 165 | 5.147 | 6.176 | 6 | 5 | 15 | 97.152% |
| height | 335 | 10.449 | 12.539 | 12.8 | 10.667 | 32 | 102.082% | |
| inner Laner | width | 150 | 4.679 | 5.614 | 5.6 | 4.667 | 14 | 99.742% |
| height | 290 | 9.046 | 10.855 | 10.8 | 9 | 27 | 99.497% | |
| Chuanfang(linking member) of Xitou fu | width | 75 | 2.339 | 2.807 | 2.8 | 2.333 | 7 | 99.742% |
| height | 170 | 5.303 | 6.363 | 6.4 | 5.333 | 16 | 100.580% | |
| Chuanfang(linking member) of lower purlin Joint | width | 70 | 2.183 | 2.620 | 2.8 | 2.333 | 7 | 106.867% |
| height | 170 | 5.303 | 6.363 | 6.4 | 5.333 | 16 | 100.580% | |
| Chuanfang(linking member) of ridge Purlin Joint | width | 90 | 2.807 | 3.369 | 3.4 | 2.833 | 8.5 | 100.930% |
| height | 230 | 7.174 | 8.609 | 8.6 | 7.167 | 21.5 | 99.897% | |
| Each chi is 320.6 mm | ||||||||||
| waiyan ludou | Upper width | Lower width | Upper depth | Lower depth | Er(耳) | ping(平) | dou-qi(欹) | qi(栔) | Total height | |
| Raw data | mm | 460 | 350 | 430 | 320 | 105 | 50 | 90 | 140 | 245 |
| cun | 14.348 | 10.917 | 13.412 | 9.981 | 3.275 | 1.560 | 2.807 | 4.367 | 7.642 | |
| small cun | 17.218 | 13.100 | 16.095 | 11.978 | 3.930 | 1.871 | 3.369 | 5.240 | 9.170 | |
| Fitted Value | small cun | 17.2 | 13.2 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 1.8 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 9.2 |
| cun | 14.333 | 11 | 13.333 | 10 | 3.333 | 1.5 | 2.833 | 4.333 | 7.667 | |
| fen | 43 | 33 | 40 | 30 | 10 | 4.5 | 8.5 | 13 | 23 | |
| Similarity rate | 99.897% | 100.760% | 99.411% | 100.188% | 101.778% | 96.180% | 100.930% | 99.233% | 100.324% | |
| waiyan sandou | Upper width | Lower width | Upper depth | Lower depth | Er(耳) | ping(平) | dou-qi(欹) | qi(栔) | Total height | |
| Raw data | mm | 200 | 140 | 205 | 150 | 50 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 125 |
| cun | 6.238 | 4.367 | 6.394 | 4.679 | 1.560 | 0.780 | 1.560 | 2.339 | 3.899 | |
| small cun | 7.486 | 5.240 | 7.673 | 5.614 | 1.871 | 0.936 | 1.871 | 2.807 | 4.679 | |
| Fitted Value | small cun | 7.6 | 5.6 | 7.6 | 5.6 | 2 | 0.8 | 2 | 2.8 | 4.8 |
| cun | 6.333 | 4.667 | 6.333 | 4.667 | 1.667 | 0.667 | 1.667 | 2.333 | 4 | |
| fen | 19 | 14 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 12 | |
| Similarity rate | 101.523% | 106.867% | 99.047% | 99.742% | 106.867% | 85.493% | 106.867% | 99.742% | 102.592% | |
| waiyan jiaohu dou | Upper width | Lower width | Upper depth | Lower depth | Er(耳) | ping(平) | dou-qi(欹) | qi(栔) | Total height | |
| Raw data | mm | 240 | 180 | 205 | 150 | 50 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 125 |
| cun | 7.486 | 5.614 | 6.394 | 4.679 | 1.560 | 0.780 | 1.560 | 2.339 | 3.899 | |
| small cun | 8.983 | 6.737 | 7.673 | 5.614 | 1.871 | 0.936 | 1.871 | 2.807 | 4.679 | |
| Fitted Value | small cun | 8.8 | 6.8 | 7.6 | 5.6 | 2 | 0.8 | 2 | 2.8 | 4.8 |
| cun | 7.333 | 5.667 | 6.333 | 4.667 | 1.667 | 0.667 | 1.667 | 2.333 | 4 | |
| fen | 22 | 17 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 12 | |
| Similarity rate | 97.961% | 100.930% | 99.047% | 99.742% | 106.867% | 85.493% | 106.867% | 99.742% | 102.592% | |
| neizhu ludou | Upper width | Lower width | Upper depth | Lower depth | Er(耳) | ping(平) | dou-qi(欹) | qi(栔) | Total height | |
| Raw data | mm | 450 | 340 | 425 | 325 | 105 | 50 | 90 | 140 | 245 |
| cun | 14.036 | 10.605 | 13.256 | 10.137 | 3.275 | 1.560 | 2.807 | 4.367 | 7.642 | |
| small cun | 16.843 | 12.726 | 15.908 | 12.165 | 3.930 | 1.871 | 3.369 | 5.240 | 9.170 | |
| Fitted Value | small cun | 16.8 | 12.8 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 1.8 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 9.2 |
| cun | 14.000 | 10.667 | 13.333 | 10.000 | 3.333 | 1.500 | 2.833 | 4.333 | 7.667 | |
| fen | 42 | 32 | 40 | 30 | 10 | 4.5 | 8.5 | 13 | 23 | |
| Similarity rate | 99.742% | 100.580% | 100.580% | 98.646% | 101.778% | 96.180% | 100.930% | 99.233% | 100.324% | |
| ridge purlin ludou | Upper width | Lower width | Upper depth | Lower depth | Er(耳) | ping(平) | dou-qi(欹) | qi(栔) | Total height | |
| Raw data | mm | 335 | 265 | 285 | 200 | 85 | 40 | 75 | 115 | 200 |
| cun | 10.449 | 8.266 | 8.890 | 6.238 | 2.651 | 1.248 | 2.339 | 3.587 | 6.238 | |
| small cun | 12.539 | 9.919 | 10.667 | 7.486 | 3.182 | 1.497 | 2.807 | 4.304 | 7.486 | |
| Fitted Value | small cun | 12.8 | 10 | 10.8 | 7.6 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 4.4 | 7.4 |
| cun | 10.667 | 8.333 | 9.000 | 6.333 | 2.667 | 1.333 | 2.333 | 3.667 | 6.167 | |
| fen | 32 | 25 | 27 | 19 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 18.5 | |
| Similarity rate | 102.082% | 100.818% | 101.242% | 101.523% | 100.580% | 106.867% | 99.742% | 102.220% | 98.852% | |
| upper purlin ludou | Upper width | Lower width | Upper depth | Lower depth | Er(耳) | ping(平) | dou-qi(欹) | qi(栔) | Total height | |
| Raw data | mm | 345 | 260 | 325 | 250 | 85 | 35 | 70 | 105 | 190 |
| cun | 10.761 | 8.110 | 10.137 | 7.798 | 2.651 | 1.092 | 2.183 | 3.275 | 5.926 | |
| small cun | 12.913 | 9.732 | 12.165 | 9.357 | 3.182 | 1.310 | 2.620 | 3.930 | 7.112 | |
| Fitted Value | small cun | 12.8 | 9.6 | 12 | 9.6 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 4 | 7.2 |
| cun | 10.667 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 2.667 | 1 | 2.333 | 3.333 | 6 | |
| fen | 32 | 24 | 30 | 24 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 18 | |
| Similarity rate | 99.123% | 98.646% | 98.646% | 102.592% | 100.580% | 91.600% | 106.867% | 101.778% | 101.242% | |
| lower purlin ludou | Upper width | Lower width | Upper depth | Lower depth | Er(耳) | ping(平) | dou-qi(欹) | qi(栔) | Total height | |
| Raw data | mm | 350 | 255 | 330 | 235 | 65 | 45 | 75 | 120 | 185 |
| cun | 10.917 | 7.954 | 10.293 | 7.330 | 2.027 | 1.404 | 2.339 | 3.743 | 5.770 | |
| small cun | 13.100 | 9.545 | 12.352 | 8.796 | 2.433 | 1.684 | 2.807 | 4.492 | 6.925 | |
| Fitted Value | small cun | 12.8 | 9.6 | 12.4 | 8.8 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 4.4 | 6.8 |
| cun | 10.667 | 8.000 | 10.333 | 7.333 | 2.000 | 1.333 | 2.333 | 3.667 | 5.667 | |
| fen | 32 | 24 | 31 | 22 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 17 | |
| Similarity rate | 97.707% | 100.580% | 100.390% | 100.045% | 98.646% | 94.993% | 99.742% | 97.961% | 98.202% | |
| lower purlin sandou | Upper width | Lower width | Upper depth | Lower depth | Er(耳) | ping(平) | dou-qi(欹) | qi(栔) | Total height | |
| Raw data | mm | 190 | 135 | 205 | 165 | 40 | 30 | 45 | 75 | 115 |
| cun | 5.926 | 4.211 | 6.394 | 5.147 | 1.248 | 0.936 | 1.404 | 2.339 | 3.587 | |
| small cun | 7.112 | 5.053 | 7.673 | 6.176 | 1.497 | 1.123 | 1.684 | 2.807 | 4.304 | |
| Fitted Value | small cun | 7.2 | 5.2 | 7.6 | 6 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 4.4 |
| cun | 6.000 | 4.333 | 6.333 | 5.000 | 1.333 | 1.000 | 1.333 | 2.333 | 3.667 | |
| fen | 18 | 13 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 11 | |
| Similarity rate | 101.242% | 102.909% | 99.047% | 97.152% | 106.867% | 106.867% | 94.993% | 99.742% | 102.220% | |
| upper purlin sandou | Upper width | Lower width | Upper depth | Lower depth | Er(耳) | ping(平) | dou-qi(欹) | qi(栔) | Total height | |
| Raw data | mm | 195 | 150 | 205 | 155 | 40 | 35 | 70 | 105 | 145 |
| cun | 6.082 | 4.679 | 6.394 | 4.835 | 1.248 | 1.092 | 2.183 | 3.275 | 4.523 | |
| small cun | 7.299 | 5.614 | 7.673 | 5.802 | 1.497 | 1.310 | 2.620 | 3.930 | 5.427 | |
| Fitted Value | small cun | 7.2 | 5.6 | 7.6 | 6 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 4 | 5.6 |
| cun | 6.000 | 4.667 | 6.333 | 5.000 | 1.333 | 1.000 | 2.333 | 3.333 | 4.667 | |
| fen | 18 | 14 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 14 | |
| Similarity rate | 98.646% | 99.742% | 99.047% | 103.419% | 106.867% | 91.600% | 106.867% | 101.778% | 103.182% | |
| lower purlin sandou | Upper width | Lower width | Upper depth | Lower depth | Er(耳) | ping(平) | dou-qi(欹) | qi(栔) | Total height | |
| Raw data | mm | 190 | 135 | 190 | 135 | 45 | 25 | 45 | 70 | 115 |
| cun | 5.926 | 4.211 | 5.926 | 4.211 | 1.404 | 0.780 | 1.404 | 2.183 | 3.587 | |
| small cun | 7.112 | 5.053 | 7.112 | 5.053 | 1.684 | 0.936 | 1.684 | 2.620 | 4.304 | |
| Fitted Value | small cun | 7.2 | 5.2 | 7.2 | 5.2 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 4.4 |
| cun | 6.000 | 4.333 | 6.000 | 4.333 | 1.333 | 1.000 | 1.333 | 2.333 | 3.667 | |
| fen | 18 | 13 | 18 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 11 | |
| Similarity rate | 101.242% | 102.909% | 101.242% | 102.909% | 94.993% | 128.240% | 94.993% | 106.867% | 102.220% | |
| neizhu sandou | Upper width | Lower width | Upper depth | Lower depth | Er(耳) | ping(平) | dou-qi(欹) | qi(栔) | Total height | |
| Raw data | mm | 210 | 160 | 210 | 160 | 50 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 125 |
| cun | 6.550 | 4.991 | 6.550 | 4.991 | 1.560 | 0.780 | 1.560 | 2.339 | 3.899 | |
| small cun | 7.860 | 5.989 | 7.860 | 5.989 | 1.871 | 0.936 | 1.871 | 2.807 | 4.679 | |
| Fitted Value | small cun | 7.6 | 6 | 7.6 | 6 | 2 | 0.8 | 2 | 2.8 | 4.8 |
| cun | 6.333 | 5.000 | 6.333 | 5.000 | 1.667 | 0.667 | 1.667 | 2.333 | 4.000 | |
| fen | 19 | 15 | 19 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 12 | |
| Similarity rate | 96.689% | 100.188% | 96.689% | 100.188% | 106.867% | 85.493% | 106.867% | 99.742% | 102.592% | |
| Each chi is 320.6 mm | ||||||||||||
| Raw data | Fitted Value | lower width of dou | length of the center/or half of center | |||||||||
| nn | Convert to cun | Convert to small cun | small cun | Convert to cun | Multiples of 0.4 small cun | Similarity rate | small cun | small cun | Multiples of 0.4 small cun | Convert to cun | ||
| waiyan puzuo | nidao-gong | 900 | 28.072 | 33.687 | 33.6 | 28 | 84 | 99.742% | 5.6 | 28 | 70 | 23.333 |
| nidao man-gong | 1400 | 43.668 | 52.402 | 52.8 | 44 | 132 | 100.760% | 5.6 | 47.2 | 118 | 39.333 | |
| gong is carved into the third-tier fang (horizontal timber) | 800 | 24.953 | 29.944 | 30 | 25 | 75 | 100.188% | 5.6 | 24.4 | 61 | 20.333 | |
| guazi-gong | 880 | 27.449 | 32.938 | 33 | 27.5 | 82.5 | 100.188% | 5.6 | 27.4 | 68.5 | 22.833 | |
| ling-gong | 960 | 29.944 | 35.933 | 36 | 30 | 90 | 100.188% | 5.6 | 30.4 | 76 | 25.333 | |
| outer jump length of the hua-gong | 410 | 12.789 | 15.346 | 15.6 | 13 | 39 | 101.654% | |||||
| inner jump length of the hua-gong | 385 | 12.009 | 14.410 | 14.4 | 12 | 36 | 99.927% | |||||
| Second jump | 330 | 10.293 | 12.352 | 12.4 | 10.333 | 31 | 100.390% | |||||
| total inner and outer jump length of waiyan puzuo | 1125 | 35.090 | 42.109 | 42.4 | 35.333 | 106 | 100.692% | |||||
| outer jump length of waiyan puzuo | 740 | 23.082 | 27.698 | 28 | 23.333 | 70 | 101.090% | |||||
| shanmian Puzuo | outer jump length ofshanmian puzuo | 740 | 23.082 | 27.698 | 28 | 23.333 | 70 | 101.090% | ||||
| first inner jump length | 385 | 12.009 | 14.410 | 14.4 | 12 | 36 | 99.927% | |||||
| Second inner jump length | 280 | 8.734 | 10.480 | 10.4 | 8.667 | 26 | 99.233% | |||||
| total inner jump length | 665 | 20.742 | 24.891 | 24.8 | 20.667 | 62 | 99.635% | |||||
| total inner and outer jump length of shanmian Puzuo | 1405 | 43.824 | 52.589 | 52.8 | 44 | 132 | 100.401% | |||||
| three-layer gong of the inner jump of the zhuanjiao-puzuo | first laye | 585 | 18.247 | 21.896 | 22 | 18.333 | 55 | 100.473% | 2.8 | 19.2 | 48 | 16 |
| second layer | 895 | 27.916 | 33.500 | 34 | 28.333 | 85 | 101.493% | 2.8 | 31.2 | 78 | 26 | |
| third layer | 1175 | 36.650 | 43.980 | 44 | 36.667 | 110 | 100.045% | 2.8 | 41.2 | 103 | 34.333 | |
| Neizhu Puzuo | nidao-gong | 960 | 29.944 | 35.933 | 36 | 30 | 90 | 100.188% | 6 | 30 | 75 | 25 |
| nidao man-gong(half) | 745 | 23.238 | 27.885 | 28 | 23.333 | 70 | 100.412% | 3 | 25 | 62.5 | 20.833 | |
| tatou | 1435 | 44.760 | 53.712 | 54 | 45 | 135 | 100.537% | |||||
| Each chi is 320.6 mm | ||||||||
| Raw data | Fitted Value | |||||||
| nn | Convert to cun | Convert to small cun | small cun | Convert to cun | Multiples of 0.4 small cun | Similarity rate | ||
| Foundation of the Hall | Height | 1685 | 52.558 | 63.069 | 64 | 53.333 | 160 | 101.476% |
| Width | 15240 | 475.359 | 570.430 | 568 | 473.333 | 1420 | 99.574% | |
| From the left and right edges of the platform base to the column center | 2150 | 67.062 | 80.474 | 80 | 66.667 | 200 | 99.411% | |
| From the front edge of the platform base to the column center | 2140 | 66.750 | 80.100 | 80 | 66.667 | 200 | 99.875% | |
| Theoretical depth | 544 | 453.333 | 1360 | calculate | ||||
| tiered component heights of puzuo | pu-pai-fang | 130 | 4.055 | 4.866 | 4.8 | 4 | 12 | 98.646% |
| ludou | 140 | 4.367 | 5.240 | 5.2 | 4.333 | 13 | 99.233% | |
| three zucai | 810 | 25.265 | 30.318 | 30 | 25 | 75 | 98.951% | |
| Timu | 155 | 4.835 | 5.802 | 5.6 | 4.667 | 14 | 96.525% | |
| diameter of the liao-yan-tuan | 290 | 9.046 | 10.855 | 10.4 | 8.667 | 26 | 95.811% | |
| Total height | 1525 | 47.567 | 57.080 | 56 | 46.667 | 140 | 98.107% | |
| liao-yan-tuan and Timu | 19.2 | 16 | 48 | 估算 | ||||
| Each chi is 320.6 mm | ||||||||
| Raw data | Fitted Value | |||||||
| nn | Convert to cun | Convert to small cun | small cun | Convert to cun | Multiples of 0.4 small cun | Similarity rate | ||
| Ceyang (Lateral structural elevation) | horizontal distance from ridge purlin to upper purlin | 1920 | 59.888 | 71.865 | 72 | 60 | 180 | 100.188% |
| horizontal distance from lower purlin to upper purlin | 1900 | 59.264 | 71.117 | 72 | 60 | 180 | 101.242% | |
| horizontal distance from liao-yan-tuan to lower purlin | 2050 | 63.943 | 76.731 | 76 | 63.333 | 190 | 99.047% | |
| Length of out-jump of puzuo | 740 | 23.082 | 27.698 | 28 | 23.333 | 70 | 101.090% | |
| istance between front/rear liao-yan-tuan | 11740 | 366.188 | 439.426 | 440 | 366.667 | 1100 | 100.131% | |
| Zhengyang(Principal structural framework) | distance between the Xitou fu and the Pinglang | 1890 | 58.952 | 70.742 | 72 | 60 | 180 | 101.778% |
| distance between two xitoufu | 8280 | 258.266 | 309.919 | 312 | 260 | 780 | 100.671% | |
| chu-ji | 1480 | 46.163 | 55.396 | 54 | 45 | 135 | 97.480% | |
| main ridge(Not including roof tiles) | 11240 | 350.593 | 420.711 | 420 | 350 | 1050 | 99.831% | |
| istance between left / right liao-yan-tuan | 12380 | 386.151 | 463.381 | 464 | 386.667 | 1160 | 100.134% | |
| height | from liao-yan-tuan to lower purlin | 1060 | 33.063 | 39.676 | 40 | 33.333 | 100 | 100.818% |
| from lower purlin to upper purlin | 1170 | 36.494 | 43.793 | 44 | 36.667 | 110 | 100.473% | |
| from ridge purlin to upper purlin | 1600 | 49.906 | 59.888 | 60 | 50 | 150 | 100.188% | |
| total lift | 3830 | 119.464 | 143.356 | 144 | 120 | 360 | 100.449% | |
| Unit: small cun | |||
| horizontal distance | vertical distance | slope | |
| from ridge purlin to upper purlin | 72 | 60 | 5/6 |
| from lower purlin to upper purlin | 72 | 44 | 11/18 |
| from liao-yan-tuan to lower purlin | 76 | 40 | 10/19 |
| Each chi is 320.6 mm | ||||||||
| Raw data | Fitted Value | |||||||
| nn | Convert to cun | Convert to small cun | small cun | Convert to cun | Multiples of 0.4 small cun | Similarity rate | ||
| Height | Foundation of the Hal | 1685 | 52.558 | 63.069 | 64 | 53.333 | 160 | 101.476% |
| Column | 4640 | 144.729 | 173.674 | 174 | 145 | 435 | 100.188% | |
| puzuo | 1525 | 47.567 | 57.080 | 56 | 46.667 | 140 | 98.107% | |
| From liao-yan-tuan to ridge purlin | 3830 | 119.464 | 143.356 | 144 | 120 | 360 | 100.449% | |
| From ridge purlin to upper skin of Chiwen | 3040 | 94.822 | 113.787 | 114 | 95 | 285 | 100.188% | |
| From Hall Foundation Base to Chiwen Ornament Upper Surface | 14720 | 459.139 | 550.967 | 552 | 460 | 1380 | 100.188% | |
| From the upper surface of the hall plinth to the upper surface of the ridge purlin | 9995 | 311.759 | 374.111 | 374 | 311.667 | 935 | 99.970% | |
| Chiwen | 2350 | 73.300 | 87.960 | 88 | 73.333 | 220 | 100.045% | |
| Boundary | From taoshou Head to Column Center | 3186 | 99.361 | 119.233 | 120 | 100 | 300 | 100.643% |
| distance between the eastern and western taoshou heads | 17271 | 538.710 | 646.452 | 648 | 540 | 1620 | 100.240% | |
| distance between the northern and southern taoshou heads | 16631 | 518.747 | 622.497 | 624 | 520 | 1560 | 100.242% | |
| cun | small cun | Multiples of 0.4 small cun | |
| distance between the eastern and western taoshou heads | 540 | 648 | 162 |
| distance between the northern and southern taoshou heads | 520 | 624 | 156 |
| Total height | 460 | 552 | 138 |
| length of main ridge | 360 | 432 | 108 |
| From the upper surface of the hall plinth to the upper surface of the ridge purlin | 311.667 | 374 | 93.5 |
| height from the bottom surface of the column to the upper surface of the liao-yan-tuan | 191.667 | 230 | 57.5 |
| height of column | 145 | 174 | 43.5 |
| height from the indoor floor level to the bottom surface of the front rufu | 170 | 204 | 51 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).