Submitted:
12 June 2025
Posted:
13 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. The Importance of EHRs in Healthcare
1.2. The Role of Machine Learning in Healthcare
1.3. Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning
1.3.1. Differential Privacy
1.3.2. Homomorphic Encryption
1.3.3. Federated Learning
1.4. Ethical and Regulatory Considerations
1.5. Structure of the Book
1.6. Conclusion
2. Background and Related Work
2.1. Electronic Health Records and Their Importance
2.2. Privacy Concerns in Healthcare Data
2.3. Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Techniques
2.3.1. Differential Privacy
2.3.2. Homomorphic Encryption
2.3.3. Federated Learning
2.4. Related Work
2.5. Conclusion
3. Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning for Electronic Health Records
3.1. Introduction
3.2. The Importance of Privacy in Healthcare
3.3. Privacy-Preserving Techniques in Machine Learning
3.3.1. Differential Privacy
3.3.1.1. Implementation
3.3.1.2. Challenges
3.3.2. Homomorphic Encryption
3.3.2.1. Implementation
3.3.2.2. Challenges
3.3.3. Federated Learning
3.3.3.1. Implementation
3.3.3.2. Challenges
3.4. Applications of Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning in EHRs
3.4.1. Predictive Analytics
3.4.2. Clinical Decision Support
3.4.3. Patient Outcome Monitoring
3.5. Ethical and Regulatory Considerations
3.6. Conclusion
4. Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Techniques for Electronic Health Records
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Overview of Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning
4.2.1. Importance of PPML in Healthcare
4.3. Differential Privacy
4.3.1. Mechanisms of Differential Privacy
- Randomized Algorithms: These algorithms introduce randomness into the output, ensuring that the presence or absence of any single individual’s data does not significantly alter the results.
- Laplace Mechanism: This widely used method involves adding noise drawn from a Laplace distribution to the query results based on a specified privacy parameter, epsilon (ε). A smaller ε indicates stronger privacy guarantees but may reduce data utility.
- Exponential Mechanism: This approach selects outputs based on their quality while preserving privacy, making it suitable for scenarios where the output is not a direct numeric result.
4.3.2. Challenges and Limitations
4.4. Homomorphic Encryption
4.4.1. Types of Homomorphic Encryption
- Partially Homomorphic Encryption: Supports either addition or multiplication operations on ciphertexts but not both.
- Somewhat Homomorphic Encryption: Allows a limited number of both addition and multiplication operations.
- Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE): Supports an unlimited number of both operations, enabling arbitrary computations on encrypted data.
4.4.2. Applications in Healthcare
- Secure Data Sharing: Facilitating secure collaborations among institutions without exposing patient data.
- Encrypted Machine Learning: Training models directly on encrypted EHR data, preserving privacy throughout the learning process.
4.4.3. Challenges and Limitations
- Computational Overhead: The complexity of homomorphic operations can lead to increased resource consumption and slower processing times, which may be prohibitive in real-time applications.
- Implementation Complexity: The deployment of homomorphic encryption requires specialized knowledge and infrastructure, posing barriers to widespread adoption.
4.5. Federated Learning
4.5.1. Mechanisms of Federated Learning
- Local Training: Each participating institution trains a model on its local dataset.
- Model Update Sharing: Instead of sharing raw data, institutions send model updates (e.g., gradients) to a central server.
- Aggregation: The central server aggregates the updates to form a global model, which is then sent back to the institutions for further training.
4.5.2. Advantages for Healthcare
- Privacy Preservation: By keeping data localized, federated learning mitigates the risks associated with data breaches and unauthorized access.
- Collaboration Across Institutions: It allows for collaborative research and model development without compromising patient confidentiality.
4.5.3. Challenges and Limitations
- Communication Overhead: The need for frequent communication between institutions and the central server can lead to latency issues.
- Heterogeneity of Data: Variations in data quality and distribution across institutions can impact model performance and generalization.
4.6. Hybrid Approaches
4.6.1. Benefits of Hybrid Approaches
- Enhanced Privacy Guarantees: By combining techniques, hybrid approaches can provide stronger privacy protections.
- Improved Data Utility: These methods can help mitigate the trade-off between privacy and accuracy by leveraging the strengths of different techniques.
4.6.2. Case Studies and Applications
4.7. Conclusion
5. Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning for Electronic Health Records
5.1. Introduction
5.2. The Importance of Privacy in EHRs
5.3. Overview of Privacy-Preserving Techniques
5.3.1. Differential Privacy
- Provides strong privacy guarantees, allowing for robust statistical analysis.
- Can be implemented with existing machine learning algorithms without significant modifications.
- The trade-off between privacy and data utility can be challenging, as excessive noise may degrade the quality of insights derived from the data.
- Careful calibration of noise parameters is required, necessitating expertise in statistical methods.
5.3.2. Homomorphic Encryption
- Provides strong security, as data remains encrypted throughout the computation process.
- Enables collaborative research without the need to share sensitive data.
- Computationally intensive, leading to increased processing times and resource demands.
- Implementation complexity may hinder practical applications in real-time healthcare settings.
5.3.3. Secure Multiparty Computation (SMC)
- Ensures privacy by design, as participants only receive the final computed result without access to individual data.
- Can be adapted for various types of machine learning tasks.
- Communication overhead can be significant, particularly as the number of participants increases.
- The complexity of the protocols may limit scalability in large collaborative settings.
5.3.4. Federated Learning
- Preserves data locality, thus minimizing privacy risks associated with data sharing.
- Enables collaborative learning from diverse datasets, enhancing model robustness.
- Communication costs can be high, especially in scenarios with many participants.
- Ensuring model performance while maintaining privacy can be challenging, particularly when data distributions vary across institutions.
5.4. Challenges in Implementing Privacy-Preserving Techniques
5.4.1. Balancing Privacy and Utility
5.4.2. Computational and Resource Constraints
5.4.3. Interoperability and Standardization
5.5. Ethical and Regulatory Considerations
5.6. Future Directions
- Hybrid Approaches: Investigating hybrid strategies that combine multiple privacy-preserving techniques could enhance security without significantly compromising model performance.
- Real-Time Applications: Developing lightweight and efficient algorithms for real-time applications in healthcare settings will be crucial for practical implementation.
- Patient-Centric Models: Exploring patient-centric approaches that empower individuals to control their data and privacy preferences can enhance trust and engagement in the data-sharing process.
- Empirical Studies: Conducting empirical studies to assess the effectiveness of PPML techniques in real-world healthcare scenarios will provide valuable insights and guide best practices.
5.7. Conclusion
6. Future Directions in Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning for Electronic Health Records
6.1. Advancements in Privacy-Preserving Techniques
6.1.1. Novel Cryptographic Approaches
6.1.2. Enhanced Differential Privacy Mechanisms
6.1.3. Federated Learning Innovations
6.2. Addressing Scalability Challenges
6.2.1. Large-Scale Deployments
6.2.2. Interoperability Across Systems
6.3. Ethical and Regulatory Considerations
6.3.1. Ethical Frameworks for AI in Healthcare
6.3.2. Compliance with Evolving Regulations
6.4. Interdisciplinary Collaboration
6.5. Conclusion
References
- Hossan, K.M.R.; Rahman, M.H.; Hossain, M.D. HUMAN-CENTERED AI IN HEALTHCARE: BRIDGING SMART SYSTEMS AND PERSONALIZED MEDICINE FOR COMPASSIONATE CARE.
- Hossain, M.D.; Rahman, M.H.; Hossan, K.M. RArtificial Intelligence in healthcare: Transformative applications, ethical challenges, and future directions in medical diagnostics and personalized medicine. 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.W.; Khan, A.U. ; Banerjee, ISystematic review of hybrid vision transformer architectures for radiological image analysis. Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2025, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Springenberg, M.; Frommholz, A.; Wenzel, M.; Weicken, E.; Ma, J. ; Strodthoff, NFrom modern CNNs to vision transformers: Assessing the performance, robustness, and classification strategies of deep learning models in histopathology. Medical image analysis 2023, 87, 102809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Atabansi, C.C.; Nie, J.; Liu, H.; Song, Q.; Yan, L. ; Zhou, XA survey of Transformer applications for histopathological image analysis: New developments and future directions. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 2023, 22(1), 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sharma, R.R.; Sungheetha, A.; Tiwari, M.; Pindoo, I.A.; Ellappan, V.; Pradeep, G.G.S. Comparative Analysis of Vision Transformer and CNN Architectures in Medical Image Classification. International Conference on Sustainability Innovation in Computing and Engineering (ICSICE 2024), May 2025; Atlantis Press, 2025; pp. 1343–1355. [Google Scholar]
- Patil, P. RDeep Learning Revolution in Skin Cancer Diagnosis with Hybrid Transformer-CNN Architectures. Vidhyayana-An International Multidisciplinary Peer-Reviewed E-Journal-ISSN 2454-8596 2025, 10. [Google Scholar]
- Shobayo, O. ; Saatchi, RDevelopments in Deep Learning Artificial Neural Network Techniques for Medical Image Analysis and Interpretation. Diagnostics 2025, 15(9), 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karthik, R.; Thalanki, V.; Yadav, P. Deep Learning-Based Histopathological Analysis for Colon Cancer Diagnosis: A Comparative Study of CNN and Transformer Models with Image Preprocessing Techniques. In International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, 2023; pp. 90–101. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, H.; Xu, Q.; Cong, F.; Kang, J.; Han, C.; Liu, Z. ... & Lu, CVision transformers for computational histopathology. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 2023, 17, 63–79. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, S. Computer-aided diagnosis of thoracic diseases in chest X-rays using hybrid cnn-transformer architecture. arXiv arXiv:2404.11843, 2024.
- Fu, B.; Zhang, M.; He, J.; Cao, Y.; Guo, Y. ; Wang, RStoHisNet: A hybrid multi-classification model with CNN and Transformer for gastric pathology images. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2022, 221, 106924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bougourzi, F.; Dornaika, F.; Distante, C. ; Taleb-Ahmed, AD-TrAttUnet: Toward hybrid CNN-transformer architecture for generic and subtle segmentation in medical images. Computers in biology and medicine 2024, 176, 108590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Islam, M.T.; Rahman, M.A.; Mazumder, M.T.R.; Shourov, S. HCOMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NEURAL NETWORK ARCHITECTURES FOR MEDICAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION: EVALUATING PERFORMANCE ACROSS DIVERSE MODELS. American Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Solutions 2024, 4, 01–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanitha, K.; Manimaran, A.; Chokkanathan, K.; Anitha, K.; Mahesh, T.R.; Kumar, V.V.; Vivekananda, G. NAttention-based Feature Fusion with External Attention Transformers for Breast Cancer Histopathology Analysis. IEEE Access 2024.
- Borji, A.; Kronreif, G.; Angermayr, B. ; Hatamikia, SAdvanced hybrid deep learning model for enhanced evaluation of osteosarcoma histopathology images. Frontiers in Medicine 2025, 12, 1555907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aburass, S.; Dorgham, O.; Al Shaqsi, J.; Abu Rumman, M. ; Al-Kadi, OVision Transformers in Medical Imaging: a Comprehensive Review of Advancements and Applications Across Multiple Diseases. Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2025, 1–44. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Yang, S.; Zhang, J.; Wang, M.; Zhang, J.; Yang, W. ... & Han, XTransformer-based unsupervised contrastive learning for histopathological image classification. Medical image analysis 2022, 81, 102559. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Xia, K. ; Wang, JRecent advances of transformers in medical image analysis: a comprehensive review. MedComm–Future Medicine 2023, 2, e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, S.; Dubey, A.K.; Singh, R.; Kalra, M.K.; Abraham, A.; Kumari, V. ... & Suri, J.SFour transformer-based deep learning classifiers embedded with an attention U-Net-based lung segmenter and layer-wise relevance propagation-based heatmaps for COVID-19 X-ray scans. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1534. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Henry, E.U.; Emebob, O.; Omonhinmin, C. AVision transformers in medical imaging: A review. arXiv arXiv:2211.10043, 2022.
- Manjunatha, A.; Mahendra, G. TransNet: A Hybrid Deep Learning Architecture Combining CNNs and Transformers for Enhanced Medical Image Segmentation. In , 24; IEEE: 2024; pp. 221-225. 2024 International Conference on Computing and Intelligent Reality Technologies (ICCIRT), December 2024; IEEE, 2024; pp. 221–225. [Google Scholar]
- Reza, S.M.; Hasnath, A.B.; Roy, A.; Rahman, A.; Faruk, A. BAnalysis of transformer and CNN based approaches for classifying renal abnormality from image data. Doctoral dissertation, Brac University, 2024. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).