Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Care in Ghana: A Call to Action for Stewardship in This Population

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

10 June 2025

Posted:

10 June 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background/ Objectives: Antibiotic use is common among hospitalized pediatric patients. However, inappropriate use, including appreciable use of Watch antibiotics, can contribute to antimicrobial resistance, adverse events and increased healthcare costs. Consequently, there is a need to continually assess their usage among this vulnerable population. This was the objective behind this study. Methods: The medical records of all pediatric patients (under 12 years) admitted and treated with antibiotics at a Ghanaian Teaching Hospital between January 2022 and March 2022 were extracted from the hospital’s electronic database. The prevalence and appropriateness of antibiotic use was based on antibiotic choices compared with current guidelines. Influencing factors were also assessed. Results: Of the 410 admitted patients, 319 (77.80%) received at least one antibiotic. The majority (68.65%, n=219/319) were between 0-2 years and males (54.55%, n=174/319). Ceftriaxone was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic (20.69%, n=66/319), and most of the systemic antibiotics used belonged to the WHO Access and Watch groups including a combination of Access and Watch groups (42.90%, n=136/319). Neonatal sepsis (24.14%, n=77/319) and pneumonia (14.42%, n=46/319) were the most common diagnoses treated with antibiotics. Antibiotic appropriateness was 42.32% (n=135/319). Multivariate analysis revealed ceftriaxone prescriptions (aOR=0.12, CI=0.02-0.95, p-value=0.044) and surgical prophylaxis (aOR=0.07, CI=0.01-0.42, p-value=0.004) were associated with reduced antibiotic appropriateness, while a pneumonia diagnosis appreciably increased this (aOR=15.38, CI=3.30-71.62, p-value < 0.001). Conclusion: There was high and suboptimal usage of antibiotics among hospitalized pediatric patients in this leading hospital. Antibiotic appropriateness was influenced by antibiotic type, diagnosis, and surgical prophylaxis. Targeted interventions, including education, are needed to improve antibiotic utilization in this setting in Ghana and subsequently in ambulatory care
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global concern with increasing morbidity and mortality exacerbated by inappropriate antibiotic use [1,2,3,4]. As a result, AMR is increasingly seen as the next pandemic unless appreciable activities are undertaken to help reverse rising AMR rates [5]. This is particularly important among low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including sub-Saharan African countries, where the burden of AMR is greatest [6,7]. The economic consequences associated with AMR can also be considerable, with estimates that by 2050 AMR could reduce gross domestic product per country by up to 3.8% [8,9].
The pediatric population is at greater risk of AMR than other populations; consequently, this age group should be carefully managed to reduce future morbidity and mortality [10]. Considerable rates of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) have been reported in Africa and the Middle East in this population, up to 66-90% in some studies [11,12,13,14,15], with AMR exacerbated by appreciable inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics occurring in up to 50% or more of antibiotics prescribed among pediatric patients [16,17,18,19]. The pediatric population is typically exposed to antibiotics more than any other form of medication due to their susceptibility to infections [18], with rising antibiotic consumption among young sick children in recent years causing concern [20].
There have been several global, regional, and national initiatives in recent years to address concerns with rising AMR rates. These include the instigation of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Global Action Plan (GAP) to reduce AMR in 2015 [21], subsequently translated into national action plans (NAP) [22,23,24]. This includes Ghana; however, there have been concerns with the implementation of NAPs across Africa due to resource and personnel issues [25,26,27]. Suggested NAP activities include greater monitoring of current antimicrobial utilization rates across sectors as well as the instigation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities, which includes the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) with their known impact on improving future antibiotic utilization [28,29,30].
Other global initiatives include the development of WHO essential medicines list classifying antibiotics into three categories, namely Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) antibiotics, based on their resistance potential [31,32]. Under this system, antibiotics from the Access group, with their narrow spectrum of activity, are encouraged where antibiotic prescribing or dispensing is pertinent, due to their generally low resistance potential [31,32]. Antibiotics from the Watch group, which include azithromycin as well as third-generation cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone, should ideally be prescribed only in critical conditions due to their broader-spectrum activity and greater resistance potential. Antibiotics from the Reserve group, including colistin, should only be prescribed in multidrug-resistant cases as they are last resort antibiotics [31,32].
In 2022, the WHO launched the WHO AWaRe book, giving guidance on the management of 35 infections typically seen across sectors, with guidance subsequently moderated depending on local resistance patterns and updates [33,34,35,36]. It is increasingly likely that indicators to improve future antibiotic prescribing will be based on reducing the utilization of Watch and Reserve antibiotics. Indicators are also likely to include encouraging greater adherence to well accepted and robust guidelines now that the WHO AWaRe book guidelines are available, alongside the increasing use of the WHO AWaRe system to track antibiotic utilization patterns [33,35,36,37,38,39]. Such activities will be encouraged by the recent United Nations General Assembly (UN GA) goal to reduce AMR, which includes a new target of at least 70% of antibiotic use across sectors being from the Access group [40]. Low- and middle-Income countries (LMICs), including sub-Saharan African countries, will be critical in this respect to reverse increasing consumption of Watch and Reserve antibiotics and their subsequent impact on AMR [41,42]. Published studies in LMICs have shown that increased audit and education surrounding the AWaRe classification and guidance can decrease inappropriate prescribing of Watch and Reserve antibiotics, including in Ghana [43,44].
We are aware that there have been concerns with inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics across sectors in Ghana, including among children and during the COVID-19 pandemic, exacerbated by a lack of culture and sensitivity testing and compliance with treatment guidelines [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. This includes Ho Teaching Hospital (HTH), where a point prevalence survey (PPS) undertaken in 2020 showed a high prevalence of antibiotic use among children, exacerbated by a poor guideline compliance rate of 33% [57,58]. Infections in Ghana's pediatric population are an appreciable concern, with pneumonia, diarrhea, and malaria being the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in this population [50,57,58]. Limited access to medical care, especially in rural areas, alongside malnutrition exacerbates the situation [59]. However, we are also aware of ongoing activities to improve future antibiotic prescribing in Ghana, including ASPs, that have helped to address current concerns [15,44,60,61].
Consequently, given previous findings and activities, there is a need to assess the current prevalence and appropriateness of antibiotic use initially among hospitalized pediatric patients presenting with common infectious diseases in Ghana, alongside key factors influencing treatment choices. In view of this, this paper aims to ascertain current antibiotic utilization patterns among hospitalized children in a tertiary hospital in Ghana, their appropriateness, as well as key factors influencing antibiotic choices. The findings can be used to suggest targeted interventions where pertinent to improve future antibiotic prescribing among this vulnerable hospitalized population. This is seen as imperative with pediatricians in tertiary hospitals playing a key role in educating future prescribers in primary care. If there are concerns with the antibiotic prescribing habits, and knowledge regarding AMS, among hospital pediatricians [62], these concerns will be magnified once trained physicians and other healthcare professionals start treating children in ambulatory care in Ghana.

2. Results

The electronic medical records of pediatric patients (children under 12 years) admitted and treated with antibiotics at the Ho Teaching Hospital over a three-month duration (January 2022 to March 2022) were collected and analyzed.

2.1. Patient Characteristics and Their Association with Guideline Compliance

The total number of pediatric patients hospitalized within the three-month study period was 410. Out of this, 319 patients were prescribed an antibiotic, giving a prevalence rate of 77.80%. With a mean age of 2.39 ± 2.99 years, the majority (68.65%, n=219/319) of patients were between the ages of 0-2 years, followed by those between the ages of 3-5 years (16.61%, n=53/319). Most of the children were male (54.55%, n=174/319) and lived in the rural part of the Ho Municipality (46.86%, n=149/318).
The mean duration of admission was 9.14 ± 10.73 days, while that of antibiotic therapy was 3.03 ± 2.43 days. Most (96.55%, n=308/319) of the patients’ treatment was based on biomarker findings, with white blood cell count (WBC) (41.56%, n=128/308) being the most commonly used biomarker, followed by a combination of WBC with C-reactive protein (CRP) (26.30%, n=81/308).
The majority (56.74%, n=181/319) of the pediatric patients were prescribed two antibiotics, followed by those who were given a single antibiotic (37.62%, N=120/319). The commonest antibiotics prescribed were ceftriaxone (20.69%, n=66/319), followed by a combination of cefotaxime + flucloxacillin (15.99%, n=51/319) and ampicillin + gentamicin (15.05%, n=48/319). Most of the systemic antibiotics prescribed were a combination of the WHO Access and Watch groups (42.90%, n=136/319), followed by those from the Watch group alone (29.97%, n=95/319). Most antibiotics were administered intravenously (82.76%, n=264/319) followed by a combination of intravenous and oral (IV + PO) routes (8.46%, n=27/319).
Neonatal sepsis (24.14%, n=77/319) followed by pneumonia (14.42%, n=46/319) and neonatal jaundice arising from neonatal sepsis (5.64%, 18/319) were the most common infectious diseases managed with antibiotics among these neonates and children.
The level of appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions for these patients based on guideline compliance was 42.32% (n=135/319). The greatest compliance was seen in the management of childhood pneumonia (84.78% of patients) with the least compliance among reasonable patient numbers seen in those neonates and children undergoing surgery to prevent wound infections (Table 1). Overall, the level of appropriateness was associated with the type of antibiotic prescribed (p-value <0.001), the class of antibiotic prescribed (p-value <0.001), the WHO AWaRe classification of the antibiotic (p-value <0.001), the route of administration of the antibiotic (p-value=0.009) and the diagnosis (p-value <0.001) (Table 1).

2.2. Predictors of the Level of Appropriateness Based on Treatment Guideline Compliance

The level of appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing based on the choice of antibiotic was reduced by 88% when ceftriaxone (aOR= 0.12, CI= 0.02-0.95, p-value= 0.044) was prescribed compared to that of amoxicillin with clavulanic acid.
The appropriateness level was increased by approximately 15 times when pneumonia (aOR= 15.38, CI= 3.30-71.62, p-value <0.001) was diagnosed; however, appropriateness levels were reduced by 93% when antibiotics were given for surgical prophylaxis (aOR= 0.07, CI= 0.01-0.42, p-value= 0.004) compared to when neonatal sepsis was diagnosed (Table 2). Overall, this showed a statistically significant association and guideline compliance based on antibiotic choice.

3. Discussion

This study found a high prevalence of antibiotic use among hospitalized pediatric patients in this leading tertiary hospital in the Volta Region, similar to previous studies in Ghana and other LMICs [48,49,57,63,64,65,66,67,68,69]. However, other studies in LMICs have demonstrated a lower prevalence of antibiotic use among this population [70,71]. The principal concern in HTH was that more than 50% of the pediatric population were given a combination of at least two broad spectrum antibiotics, which included antibiotics from the Watch group. This has implications for increasing the risk of AMR, and must be the subject of future ASPs in the hospital [35,42].
We are aware of recent activities in Ghanaian hospitals to increase the instigation of ASPs given concerns with current hospital antibiotic utilization patterns. This has been helped by partnerships with UK institutions under the umbrella of the Commonwealth Partnerships for promoting ASPs alongside other activities [15,30,44,60,72,73]. However, we are also aware that the implementation of ASPs has been challenging across LMICs, including Ghana, and among pediatricians due to factors such as health system challenges which include inadequate diagnostic infrastructure, inadequate capacity building. poor supply chain and unregulated antibiotic access [62,74]. This though is now changing across Africa, including Ghana, where studies have shown promising results from ASP interventions [30,44,75,76,77,78]. This is important to attain UN GA targets of increased use of Access antibiotics, with their lower risk of causing AMR [28,40,61].
The low level of adherence to current guidelines in our study, at only 43.2% of antibiotic prescriptions, was of utmost concern, alongside irrational antibiotic combinations. Whilst the irrational use of antibiotics has been observed in other countries and settings among this population [79,80,81,82], this needs to be urgently addressed in HTH and across Ghana to achieve NAP and UN GA AMR goals [26,40,83].
Overall, the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in our study was associated with the type of antibiotics, the WHO AWaRe group, the route of administration, and the type of infectious disease diagnosed (Table 1). Among the clinical characteristics assessed in this study, increased appropriateness was predicted by a diagnosis of pneumonia and reduced among those patients given antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis (Table 2). This is partly encouraging, with pneumonia being one of the leading causes of admission among children in this hospital and elsewhere across LMICs [47,57,82,84]. Prolonged use of antibiotics though is a concern increasing adverse reactions, AMR, and healthcare costs [85,86].
Another key concern was the appreciable prescribing of ceftriaxone either alone or in combination with the current Ghanaian STG prioritizing the prescribing of a penicillin combination, namely amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid or ampicillin with gentamicin, over the use of third generation cephalosporins for the management of commonly diagnosed pediatric conditions. These include respiratory tract infections, neonatal sepsis, and antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis. In addition, the third-generation cephalosporins are in the WHO ‘Watch’ group with their increased risk of AMR development [31,32]. The third-generation cephalosporins are especially noted for increased selective pressure that precipitates genetic mutation for AMR genes, leading to treatment failures and consequently increased mortality [87,88]. As a result, their prescribing should be avoided where possible. The recent publication of the WHO AWaRe book giving guidance for the optimal management of 35 infectious diseases across sectors should help in this regard, enhanced by recent additions as well as quality indicators based on AWaRe percentage rates and adherence to the WHO AWaRe book guidance [33,34,35,36,37].
Whilst the studied children were exposed to antibiotics for approximately three days, the duration of hospital stay was approximately nine days. This suggests that despite a relatively short duration of antibiotic treatment, hospitalization was prolonged, potentially increasing their risk of healthcare-associated infections and healthcare costs [89,90]. This highlights the urgent need for optimized care pathways and discharge planning in the hospital to improve future patient outcomes and reduce resource utilization. Whilst we did not assess the reasons for prolonged hospitalization in our study, high inappropriate use of antibiotics may have contributed to delay in recovery [91,92,93].
Suggested ASPs in the hospital centre on clinician education surrounding guideline recommended antibiotics, as well as prospective audits coupled with feedback. These measures are some of the well-studied interventions that have shown a positive impact on improving guideline compliance within hospitals and subsequent appropriate antibiotic use, especially in low-resource settings [76,77,78,94,95,96]. Key areas for ASPs in HTH include the management of sepsis among neonates and children, which are associated with high mortality rates, appropriate antibiotic use to prevent surgical site infections as well as educational programs and audits to reduce unnecessary prescribing of ceftriaxone alongside any irrational combinations [60,72,73,85,97,98]. Alongside this, Universities in Ghana need to ensure that all healthcare students are well-versed in ASP principles, including increased knowledge and confidence in the use of guideline-recommended antibiotics, as well as the WHO AWaRe system and guidance before graduation. [72,95,96,99].
We are aware of a number of limitations with our study. Firstly, we only included one tertiary hospital for the reasons stated. The number of surveyed patients may also have been enhanced if the study duration had been prolonged. In spite of these limitations, we are confident that the study findings have provided baseline data for more rigorous studies and implementation research to improve antibiotic use among the pediatric population in this hospital and across the Region.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Design

The study design was a prospective cross-sectional survey of the medical records of all pediatric patients (children under 12 years) admitted and treated with antibiotics at Ho Teaching Hospital (HTH) over a three-month duration (January 2022 to March 2022) using the hospital’s electronic database.
HTH was chosen for this study as it is a tertiary care facility located in the capital city of the Volta Region, established in November 1998. It is currently the main referral facility in the Volta Region [57]. The Volta Region is one of Ghana’s sixteen administrative regions with a 2021 population of 1,659,040, and Ho is its capital city [100]. HTH provides services to approximately 194,000 outpatients and 12500 inpatients annually. Alongside this, their gatekeeper system allows for admission and management of not only tertiary but also primary care cases. Consequently, the findings of antibiotic use from this facility may apply to lower (primary) and upper (secondary and tertiary) care facilities with similar demography and resources in this country and other LMICs.

4.2. Study Site and Population

This study was conducted in the Pediatric Department of the HTH (comprising of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Babies Unit, and the Children’s Unit) located in the Volta Region of Ghana. The Pediatric Department admits sick children who are less than one month in the NICU, between 1 month to 6 months in the Babies Unit, and between 7 months and less than 12 years in the Children’s Unit. The children’s unit with 25 beds admits an average of 950 children annually, the baby unit with 20 bed capacity admits an average of 700 babies, and the NICU with 20 bed capacity admits an average of 450 neonates annually [57]. The Department has pediatric consultants, specialists, residents and medical officers providing various services to hospitalized and ambulatory care patients.

4.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

All pediatric patients (below the age of 12 years) admitted, diagnosed with an infectious disease, and managed with antibiotics were included in the study. All sick pediatric patients within the target age group who were diagnosed as having infectious disease, and managed with antibiotics in the ambulatory clinics of this hospital, were excluded to concentrate just on inpatient prescribing.

4.4. Sample Size and Sampling Technique

No sampling was performed as all hospitalized sick children who met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. However, the study sample was guided by an estimated size of 325 patients from an expected annual sample of participants using the Raosoft Inc. online calculator, assuming a 50% appropriateness of antibiotic prescription, an average monthly inpatient attendance at the pediatric department of 175, 95% confidence interval, and a 5% margin of error.

4.5. Data Collection

Data was collected from the hospital's Lightwave Health Information Management System (LHIMS) (an electronic medical record system) using an adapted data collection checklist from the Global Point Prevalence Survey Data Collection sheet [46,101,102]. The checklist included socio-demographics information such as age, gender, location of residence (rural, urban, peri-urban), clinical characteristics including treatment based on biomarkers, duration of admission, culture and sensitivity testing, number and type of antibiotics prescribed, route of administration, and diagnosis made.
Antibiotics were grouped according to their Anatomical, Therapeutic and Chemical (ATC) classification as well as by their AWaRe classification [31,32,103]. AWaRe antibiotic groups were combined if a pediatric patient was given more than one antibiotic from different groups, e.g. Access and Watch antibiotics. The long-term goal of the UN GA is to increase the use of Access antibiotics to at least 70% utilization across sectors [40].

4.6. Antibiotic Appropriateness

Antibiotic appropriateness was assessed based on guideline compliance of the choice of antibiotics prescribed with the Seventh Edition of the Ghana Standard Treatment Guidelines (STG) for management of infectious diseases in the pediatric population [85]. Compliance with current guidelines is increasingly seen as an important marker of the quality of antimicrobial prescribing [47,49,99,104,105].

4.6. Data Analysis

The checklist data was entered into a Microsoft Excel sheet before being exported to STATA version 14 (StrataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) for analysis. The appropriateness of prescribed antibiotics based on the choice for the diagnosed infectious disease was the primary study outcome measure.
Descriptive statistics were used to determine the mean age, duration of admission, duration of antibiotic use, and the proportions of each categorical variable. Diagnoses were combined together where there were small patient numbers to help improve interpretation of the findings. The chi-square test of independence was performed to assess any association between the outcome variable and the various independent variables. A logistic regression analysis was also performed using all statistically significant independent variables from the bivariate analysis (p-value <0.05 at 95% confidence interval).

4.7. Ethical Consideration

Ethical approval was secured from both the Research Ethics Committees of the University of Health and Allied Sciences (UHAS-REC A.7 [75] 22-23) and the Ho Teaching Hospital (HTH-REC (33) FC_2022. Personal identifiers of patients were excluded during the data collection to safeguard confidentiality. No informed consent was sought from the participants as there was no direct patient contact during the data collection period. The medical records of patients were directly extracted from the hospital electronic database.

5. Conclusions

The study found a high prevalence of antibiotic use in this hospitalized pediatric population. This included irrational broad-spectrum antibiotic combinations and third generation cephalosporins, with ceftriaxone being the most commonly prescribed. These are concerns as this combination potentially increases antibiotic resistance, highlighting the need for more responsible prescribing practices.
The hospital should prioritize continuous professional development on rational prescribing as part of ASPs. ASPs should concentrate on increasing adherence to evidence-based guidelines, including for surgical prophylaxis and neonatal sepsis. The diagnostic infrastructure needs to improve to reduce empiric prescribing in this and other hospitals in Ghana, along with sustained surveillance and monitoring of antibiotic use and resistance, all driven by strong leadership commitment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, IAS, DKB, KOB, VB; methodology, IAS, DKB, KOB, BG; validation: IAS, DKB, BG; formal analysis, IS, DKB, VB, KOB, BG; investigation, IAS, DKB, KOB; resources, IAS, DKB.; data curation, IAS, DKB, KOB, VB, BG; writing—original draft IAS, DKB, BG; writing—review and editing, all authors.; visualization, IAS, VB; supervision, IAS; project administration, IAS, DKB. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval was secured from both the Research Ethics Committees of the University of Health and Allied Sciences (UHAS-REC A.7 [75] 22-23) and the Ho Teaching Hospital (HTH-REC (33) FC_2022.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable as personal identifiers of patients were excluded during the data collection to safeguard confidentiality, with administrative approval given by the management of the hospital for this study. This is similar to other prevalence studies undertaken by the co-authors in Ghana and other African countries [46,47,48].

Data Availability Statement

Additional data is available from the co-authors upon a reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Murray, C.J.; Ikuta, K.S.; Sharara, F.; Swetschinski, L.; Aguilar, G.R.; Gray, A.; Han, C.; Bisignano, C.; Rao, P.; Wool, E.; et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [CrossRef]
  2. Salam, M.A.; Al-Amin, M.Y.; Salam, M.T.; Pawar, J.S.; Akhter, N.; Rabaan, A.A.; Alqumber, M.A.A. Antimicrobial Resistance: A Growing Serious Threat for Global Public Health. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1946. [CrossRef]
  3. Cassini, A.; Hogberg, L.D.; Plachouras, D.; Quattrocchi, A.; Hoxha, A.; Simonsen, G.S.; Colomb-Cotinat, M.; Kretzschmar, M.E.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Cecchini, M.; et al. Attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life-years caused by infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the EU and the European Economic Area in 2015: A population-level modelling analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 56–66. [CrossRef]
  4. Bell BG, Schellevis F, Stobberingh E, Goossens H, Pringle M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of antibiotic consumption on antibiotic resistance. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:13. [CrossRef]
  5. Gautam A. Antimicrobial Resistance: The Next Probable Pandemic. JNMA. 2022, 60, 225–228. [CrossRef]
  6. Sartorius, B.; Gray, A.P.; Weaver, N.D.; Aguilar, G.R.; Swetschinski, L.R.; Ikuta, K.S.; Mestrovic, T.; Chung, E.; Wool, E.E.; Han, C, et al. The burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in the WHO African region in 2019: a cross-country systematic analysis. The Lancet Global Health 2024, 12, e201-e216. [CrossRef]
  7. Lewnard, J.A.; Charani, E.; Gleason, A.; Hsu, L.Y.; Khan, W.A.; Karkey, A.; Chandler, C.I.R.; Mashe, T.; Khan, E.M.; Bulabula, A.N.H.; et al. Burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in low-income and middle-income countries avertible by existing interventions: An evidence review and modelling analysis. Lancet 2024, 403, 2439–2454. [CrossRef]
  8. World Bank Group. Pulling Together to Beat Superbugs Knowledge and Implementation Gaps in Addressing Antimicrobial Resistance. 2019. Available at URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/32552/Pulling-Together-to-Beat-Superbugs-Knowledge-and-Implementation-Gaps-in-Addressing-Antimicrobial-Resistance.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
  9. Hofer U. The cost of antimicrobial resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 3. [CrossRef]
  10. Atif M, Zia R, Malik I, Ahmad N, Sarwar S. Treatment outcomes, antibiotic use and its resistance pattern among neonatal sepsis patients attending Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Pakistan. PLoS One. 2021;16(1):e0244866. [CrossRef]
  11. Okomo U, Akpalu ENK, Le Doare K, Roca A, Cousens S, Jarde A, et al. Aetiology of invasive bacterial infection and antimicrobial resistance in neonates in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis in line with the STROBE-NI reporting guidelines. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(11):1219-34. [CrossRef]
  12. Al Jarousha AM, El Jadba AH, Al Afifi AS, El Qouqa IA. Nosocomial multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in the neonatal intensive care unit in Gaza City, Palestine. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13(5):623-8. [CrossRef]
  13. Le Doare K, Barker CI, Irwin A, Sharland M. Improving antibiotic prescribing for children in the resource-poor setting. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;79(3):446-55. [CrossRef]
  14. Ibrahim BA, Damiri B, Allabadi H, Qadi M. Bacteriological profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of septicemia in neonatal intensive care units in Palestine: A retrospective study. IJID Reg. 2024;10:87-93. [CrossRef]
  15. Donkor ES, Muhsen K, Johnson SAM, Kotey FCN, Dayie N, Tetteh-Quarcoo PB, et al. Multicenter Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance among Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated from Bloodstream Infections in Ghana. Antibiotics. 2023;12(2). [CrossRef]
  16. Karataş Y, Khan Z. Antibiotic usage in the Pediatric population: the need for effective role of parents and prescribers. Güncel Pediatri. 2021;19(1):135-40. [CrossRef]
  17. Miao R, Wan C, Wang Z, Zhu Y, Zhao Y, Zhang L, et al. Inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions among pediatric inpatients in different type hospitals. Medicine. 2020;99(2):e18714. [CrossRef]
  18. Romandini A, Pani A, Schenardi PA, Pattarino GAC, De Giacomo C, Scaglione F. Antibiotic resistance in pediatric infections: global emerging threats, predicting the near future. Antibiotics. 2021;10(4):393. [CrossRef]
  19. Baig MT, Sial AA, Huma A, Ahmed M, Shahid U, Syed N. Irrational antibiotic prescribing practice among children in critical care of tertiary hospitals. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2017;30(4(Suppl.)):1483-9.
  20. Allwell-Brown G, Hussain-Alkhateeb L, Kitutu FE, Strömdahl S, Mårtensson A, Johansson EW. Trends in reported antibiotic use among children under 5 years of age with fever, diarrhoea, or cough with fast or difficult breathing across low-income and middle-income countries in 2005-17: a systematic analysis of 132 national surveys from 73 countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(6):e799-e807. [CrossRef]
  21. WHO. GLOBAL ACTION PLAN ON ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE. 2015. Available at URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/193736/9789241509763_eng.pdf?sequence=1 (Accessed 5 March 2025).
  22. Charani E, Mendelson M, Pallett SJC, Ahmad R, Mpundu M, Mbamalu O, et al. An analysis of existing national action plans for antimicrobial resistance-gaps and opportunities in strategies optimising antibiotic use in human populations. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11(3):e466-e74. [CrossRef]
  23. Iwu, C.D.; Patrick, S.M. An insight into the implementation of the global action plan on antimicrobial resistance in the WHO African region: A roadmap for action. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2021, 58, 106411. [CrossRef]
  24. Willemsen A, Reid S, Assefa Y. A review of national action plans on antimicrobial resistance: strengths and weaknesses. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022;11(1):90. [CrossRef]
  25. Godman, B.; Egwuenu, A.;Wesangula, E.; Schellack, N.; Kalungia, A.C.; Tiroyakgosi, C.; Kgatlwane, J.; Mwita, J.C.; Patrick, O.; Niba, L.L.; et al. Tackling antimicrobial resistance across sub-Saharan Africa: Current challenges and implications for the future. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2022, 21, 1089–1111. [CrossRef]
  26. Ghana Ministry of Health, Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Ministry of Environment, Science, Technology and Innovation, Ministry of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development. Ghana National Action Plan for Antimicrobial Use and Resistance. 2017 - 2021. Available at URL: http://www.moh.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/NAP_FINAL_PDF_A4_19.03.2018-SIGNED-1.pdf (Accessed 4 March 2025).
  27. Jimah T OO. National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance: stakeholder analysis of implementation in Ghana. Journal of Global Health Reports. 2020;4(e2020067.):1-16. doi:0.29392/001c.13695.
  28. Nathwani D, Varghese D, Stephens J, Ansari W, Martin S, Charbonneau C. Value of hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs [ASPs]: a systematic review. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8:35. [CrossRef]
  29. Sneddon J, Drummond F, Guise T, Gilchrist M, Jenkins DR. Accreditation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes: addressing a global need to tackle antimicrobial resistance. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance. 2024;6(1). [CrossRef]
  30. Ashiru-Oredope D, Garraghan F, Olaoye O, Krockow EM, Matuluko A, Nambatya W, et al. Development and Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Checklist in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Co-Creation Consensus Approach. Healthcare. 2022;10(9). [CrossRef]
  31. Sharland M, Pulcini C, Harbarth S, Zeng M, Gandra S, Mathur S, et al. Classifying antibiotics in the WHO Essential Medicines List for optimal use—be AWaRe. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):18–20. [CrossRef]
  32. Sharland, M.; Gandra, S.; Huttner, B.; Moja, L.; Pulcini, C.; Zeng, M.; Mendelson, M.; Cappello, B.; Cooke, G.; Magrini, N., et al. Encouraging AWaRe-ness and discouraging inappropriate antibiotic use—the new 2019 Essential Medicines List becomes a global antibiotic stewardship tool. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2019, 19, 1278-1280. [CrossRef]
  33. . WHO. The WHO AWaRe (Access, Watch, Reserve) antibiotic book. 2022 Available at URL: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240062382 (Accesses 6 April, 2025).
  34. Zanichelli, V.; Sharland, M.; Cappello, B.; Moja, L.; Getahun, H.; Pessoa-Silva, C.; Sati, H.; van Weezenbeek, C.; Balky, H.; Simao, M.; et al. The WHO AWaRe (Access, Watch, Reserve) antibiotic book and prevention of antimicrobial resistance. Bull. World Health Organ. 2023, 101, 290–296. [CrossRef]
  35. Moja, L.; Zanichelli, V.; Mertz, D.; Gandra, S.; Cappello, B.; Cooke, G.S.; Chuki, P.; Harbath, S.; Pulcini, C.; Mendelson, M.; et al. WHO’s essential medicines and AWaRe: Recommendations on first- and second-choice antibiotics for empiric treatment of clinical infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2024, 30, S1–S51. [CrossRef]
  36. Johnson S, Lavergne V, Skinner AM, Gonzales-Luna AJ, Garey KW, Kelly CP, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA): 2021 Focused Update Guidelines on Management of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(5):e1029-e44. [CrossRef]
  37. Funiciello, E.; Lorenzetti, G.; Cook, A.; Goelen, J.; Moore, C.E.; Campbell, S.M.; Godman, B.; Tong, D.; Huttner, B.; Chuki, P.; et al. Identifying AWaRe indicators for appropriate antibiotic use: A narrative review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2024, 79, 12. [CrossRef]
  38. Pauwels I, Versporten A, Drapier N, Vlieghe E, Goossens H. Hospital antibiotic prescribing patterns in adult patients according to the WHO Access, Watch and Reserve classification (AWaRe): results from a worldwide point prevalence survey in 69 countries. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76(6):1614-24. [CrossRef]
  39. Saleem Z, Sheikh S, Godman B, Haseeb A, Afzal S, Qamar MU, et al. Increasing the use of the WHO AWaRe system in antibiotic surveillance and stewardship programmes in low- and middle-income countries. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance. 2025;7(2). [CrossRef]
  40. United Nations. Political Declaration of the High-level Meeting on Antimicrobial Resistance. 9 September 2024 Available at URL: https://www.un.org/pga/wp-content/uploads/sites/108/2024/09/FINAL-Text-AMR-to-PGA.pdf (Accessed 5 March 2025).
  41. Klein EY, Milkowska-Shibata M, Tseng KK, Sharland M, Gandra S, Pulcini C, et al. Assessment of WHO antibiotic consumption and access targets in 76 countries, 2000-15: an analysis of pharmaceutical sales data. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):107-15. [CrossRef]
  42. Sulis, G.; Sayood, S.; Katukoori, S.; Bollam, N.; George, I.; Yaeger, L.H.; Chavez, M.A.; Tetteh, E.; Yarrabelli, S.; Pulcini, C., et al. Exposure to World Health Organization's AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multidrug resistant bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2022, 28, 1193-1202. [CrossRef]
  43. Abu-Ajaleh S, Darwish Elhajji F, Al-Bsoul S, Abu Farha R, Al-Hammouri F, Amer A, et al. An Evaluation of the Impact of Increasing the Awareness of the WHO Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) Antibiotics Classification on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Hospital Antibiotic Prescribing Practices. Antibiotics. 2023;12(6). [CrossRef]
  44. Amponsah OKO, Courtenay A, Ayisi-Boateng NK, Abuelhana A, Opoku DA, Blay LK, et al. Assessing the impact of antimicrobial stewardship implementation at a district hospital in Ghana using a health partnership model. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance. 2023;5(4). [CrossRef]
  45. Sefah IA, Denoo EY, Bangalee V, Kurdi A, Sneddon J, Godman B. Appropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in a teaching hospital in Ghana: findings and implications. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022;4(5):dlac102. [CrossRef]
  46. Afriyie DK, Sefah IA, Sneddon J, Malcolm W, McKinney R, Cooper L, et al. Antimicrobial point prevalence surveys in two Ghanaian hospitals: opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2020;2(1):dlaa001. [CrossRef]
  47. Sefah IA, Essah DO, Kurdi A, Sneddon J, Alalbila TM, Kordorwu H, et al. Assessment of adherence to pneumonia guidelines and its determinants in an ambulatory care clinic in Ghana: findings and implications for the future. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021;3(2):dlab080. [CrossRef]
  48. Sefah IA, Nyamadi D, Kurdi A, Bugri AA, Kerr F, Yamoah P, et al. Assessment of the quality of antimicrobial prescribing among hospitalized patients in a teaching hospital in Ghana: findings and implications. Hosp Pract. 2023;51(4):223-32. [CrossRef]
  49. Agyare E, Acolatse JEE, Dakorah MP, Akafity G, Chalker VJ, Spiller OB, et al. Antimicrobial stewardship capacity and antibiotic utilisation practices in the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Ghana: A point prevalence survey study. PLoS One. 2024;19(1):e0297626. [CrossRef]
  50. Labi AK, Obeng-Nkrumah N, Sunkwa-Mills G, Bediako-Bowan A, Akufo C, Bjerrum S, et al. Antibiotic prescribing in paediatric inpatients in Ghana: a multi-centre point prevalence survey. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):391. [CrossRef]
  51. Labi AK, Obeng-Nkrumah N, Nartey ET, Bjerrum S, Adu-Aryee NA, Ofori-Adjei YA, et al. Antibiotic use in a tertiary healthcare facility in Ghana: a point prevalence survey. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018;7:15. [CrossRef]
  52. Labi AK, Obeng-Nkrumah N, Dayie N, Egyir B, Sampane-Donkor E, Newman MJ, et al. Antimicrobial use in hospitalized patients: a multicentre point prevalence survey across seven hospitals in Ghana. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021;3(3):dlab087. [CrossRef]
  53. Bediako-Bowan AAA, Owusu E, Labi AK, Obeng-Nkrumah N, Sunkwa-Mills G, Bjerrum S, et al. Antibiotic use in surgical units of selected hospitals in Ghana: a multi-centre point prevalence survey. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):797. [CrossRef]
  54. Adadey SM, Ayee R, Languon S, Quansah D, Quaye O. Patterns of Frequently Diagnosed Pediatric Morbidities in Hospitalized Children in the Volta Region of Ghana. Glob Pediatr Health. 2019;6:2333794x19889230. [CrossRef]
  55. Sefah IA, Sarkodie SA, Pichierri G, Schellack N, Godman B. Assessing the Clinical Characteristics and Management of COVID-19 among Pediatric Patients in Ghana: Findings and Implications. Antibiotics. 2023;12(2):283. [CrossRef]
  56. Amponsah OKO, Buabeng KO, Owusu-Ofori A, Ayisi-Boateng NK, Hämeen-Anttila K, Enlund H. Point prevalence survey of antibiotic consumption across three hospitals in Ghana. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021;3(1):dlab008. [CrossRef]
  57. Dodoo CC, Orman E, Alalbila T, Mensah A, Jato J, Mfoafo KA, et al. Antimicrobial Prescription Pattern in Ho Teaching Hospital, Ghana: Seasonal Determination Using a Point Prevalence Survey. Antibiotics. 2021;10(2). [CrossRef]
  58. Domapielle MK, Dassah C, Dordaa F, Cheabu BSN, Sulemana M. Barriers to health care access and utilization among aged indigents under the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty Programme (LEAP): the perspective of users and service providers in north-western Ghana. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2023;24:e48. [CrossRef]
  59. Morales F, Montserrat-de la Paz S, Leon MJ, Rivero-Pino F. Effects of Malnutrition on the Immune System and Infection and the Role of Nutritional Strategies Regarding Improvements in Children's Health Status: A Literature Review. Nutrients. 2023;16(1). [CrossRef]
  60. Sneddon J, Cooper L, Afriyie DK, Sefah IA, Cockburn A, Kerr F, et al. Supporting antimicrobial stewardship in Ghana: evaluation of the impact of training on knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals in two hospitals. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2020;2(4):dlaa092. [CrossRef]
  61. Dakorah MP, Agyare E, Acolatse JEE, Akafity G, Stelling J, Chalker VJ, et al. Utilising cumulative antibiogram data to enhance antibiotic stewardship capacity in the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Ghana. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022;11(1):122. [CrossRef]
  62. Mustafa ZU, Khan AH, Salman M, Harun SN, Meyer JC, Godman B. Paediatricians' knowledge, perceptions, preparedness and involvement towards paediatric antimicrobial stewardship in Pakistan: findings and the implications. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024;6(6):dlae193. [CrossRef]
  63. Moore DP, Chetty T, Pillay A, Karsas M, Cloete J, Balakrishna Y, et al. Antibiotic and antifungal use in paediatric departments at three academic hospitals in South Africa. IJID Reg. 2024;10:151-8. [CrossRef]
  64. Xavier SP, da Silva AMC, Victor A. Antibiotic prescribing patterns in pediatric patients using the WHO access, watch, reserve (AWaRe) classification at a quaternary hospital in Nampula, Mozambique. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):22719. [CrossRef]
  65. Xavier SP, Victor A, Cumaquela G, Vasco MD, Rodrigues OAS. Inappropriate use of antibiotics and its predictors in pediatric patients admitted at the Central Hospital of Nampula, Mozambique. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022;11(1):79. [CrossRef]
  66. Umeokonkwo CD, Madubueze UC, Onah CK, Okedo-Alex IN, Adeke AS, Versporten A, et al. Point prevalence survey of antimicrobial prescription in a tertiary hospital in South East Nigeria: A call for improved antibiotic stewardship. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019;17:291-5. [CrossRef]
  67. Mambula G, Nanjebe D, Munene A, Guindo O, Salifou A, Mamaty AA, et al. Practices and challenges related to antibiotic use in paediatric treatment in hospitals and health centres in Niger and Uganda: a mixed methods study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023;12(1):67. [CrossRef]
  68. Sarker R, Khan MSI, Tareq MA, Ghosh S, Chowdhury S. Antibiotic Use Among Children Under 5 Years of Age in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Bangladesh. SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine. 2021;3(4):982-8. [CrossRef]
  69. Abdel-Qader DH, Ismael NS, Albassam A, El-Shara’ AA, Aljamal MS, Ismail R, et al. Antibiotics use and appropriateness in two Jordanian children hospitals: a point prevalence study. Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research. 2021;12(2):166-72. [CrossRef]
  70. Mandal P, Asad M, Kayal A, Biswas M. Assessment of use of World Health Organization access, watch, reserve antibiotics and core prescribing indicators in pediatric outpatients in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Eastern India. Perspect Clin Res. 2023;14(2):61-7. [CrossRef]
  71. Skosana PP, Schellack N, Godman B, Kurdi A, Bennie M, Kruger D, et al. A national, multicentre, web-based point prevalence survey of antimicrobial use and quality indices among hospitalised paediatric patients across South Africa. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2022;29:542-50. [CrossRef]
  72. Sefah IA, Chetty S, Yamoah P, Godman B, Bangalee V. An Assessment of the Current Level of Implementation of the Core Elements of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Public Hospitals in Ghana. Hosp Pharm. 2024;59(3):367-77. [CrossRef]
  73. Ashiru-Oredope D, Nabiryo M, Zengeni L, Kamere N, Makotose A, Olaoye O, et al. Tackling antimicrobial resistance: developing and implementing antimicrobial stewardship interventions in four African commonwealth countries through a health partnership model. J Public Health Afr. 2023;14(6):2335. [CrossRef]
  74. Cox JA, Vlieghe E, Mendelson M, Wertheim H, Ndegwa L, Villegas MV, et al. Antibiotic stewardship in low- and middle-income countries: the same but different? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23(11):812-8. [CrossRef]
  75. Dramowski A, Prusakov P, Goff DA, Brink A, Govender NP, Annor AS, et al. Prospective antimicrobial stewardship interventions by multidisciplinary teams to reduce neonatal antibiotic use in South Africa: The Neonatal Antimicrobial Stewardship (NeoAMS) study. Int J Infect Dis. 2024;146:107158. [CrossRef]
  76. Siachalinga L, Mufwambi W, Lee IH. Impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing for hospital inpatients in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect. 2022;129:124-43. [CrossRef]
  77. Otieno PA, Campbell S, Maley S, Obinju Arunga T, Otieno Okumu M. A Systematic Review of Pharmacist-Led Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Clin Pract. 2022;2022:3639943. [CrossRef]
  78. Akpan MR, Isemin NU, Udoh AE, Ashiru-Oredope D. Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in African countries: a systematic literature review. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020;22:317-24. [CrossRef]
  79. Al-Tawfiq JA, Alawami AH. A multifaceted approach to decrease inappropriate antibiotic use in a pediatric outpatient clinic. Annals of Thoracic Medicine. 2017;12(1):51-4. [CrossRef]
  80. Dooling KL, Shapiro DJ, Van Beneden C, Hersh AL, Hicks LA. Overprescribing and inappropriate antibiotic selection for children with pharyngitis in the United States, 1997-2010. JAMA pediatrics. 2014;168(11):1073-4. [CrossRef]
  81. Marc C, Vrignaud B, Levieux K, Robine A, Guen CG-L, Launay E. Inappropriate prescription of antibiotics in pediatric practice: analysis of the prescriptions in primary care. Journal of Child Health Care. 2016;20(4):530-6. [CrossRef]
  82. Mustafa ZU, Salman M, Aslam N, Asif N, Hussain K, Shehzadi N, et al. Antibiotic use among hospitalized children with lower respiratory tract infections: a multicenter, retrospective study from Punjab, Pakistan. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2022;20(1):131-6. [CrossRef]
  83. Tran-Quang K, Nguyen-Thi-Dieu T, Tran-Do H, Pham-Hung V, Nguyen-Vu T, Tran-Xuan B, et al. Antibiotic resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Vietnamese children with severe pneumonia: a cross-sectional study. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1110903. [CrossRef]
  84. La Vecchia A, Teklie BG, Mulu DA, Toitole KK, Montalbetti F, Agostoni C, et al. Adherence to WHO guidelines on severe pneumonia management in children and its impact on outcome: an observational study at Jinka General Hospital in Ethiopia. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1189684. [CrossRef]
  85. Mwita JC, Ogunleye OO, Olalekan A, Kalungia AC, Kurdi A, Saleem Z, et al. Key Issues Surrounding Appropriate Antibiotic Use for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Narrative Review and the Implications. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:515-30. [CrossRef]
  86. STG. Ghana Standard Treatment Guidelines (STG) - Seventh Edition. Ministry of Health, Ghana Nationa Drug Programme. 2017. Available at URL: https://www.moh.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/GHANA-STG-2017-1.pdf (Accessed 1 March 2025).
  87. Aiken AM, Rehman AM, de Kraker MEA, Madrid L, Kebede M, Labi AK, et al. Mortality associated with third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Enterobacterales bloodstream infections at eight sub-Saharan African hospitals (MBIRA): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023. [CrossRef]
  88. Dramowski A, Aiken AM, Rehman AM, Snyman Y, Reuter S, Grundmann H, et al. Mortality associated with third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections at one South African hospital. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2022;29:176-84. [CrossRef]
  89. Gold JM, Hall M, Shah SS, Thomson J, Subramony A, Mahant S, et al. Long length of hospital stay in children with medical complexity. J Hosp Med. 2016;11(11):750-6. [CrossRef]
  90. Triantafyllou C, Chorianopoulou E, Kourkouni E, Zaoutis TE, Kourlaba G. Prevalence, incidence, length of stay and cost of healthcare-acquired pressure ulcers in pediatric populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;115:103843. [CrossRef]
  91. Wald-Dickler N, Holtom PD, Phillips MC, Centor RM, Lee RA, Baden R, et al. Oral Is the New IV. Challenging Decades of Blood and Bone Infection Dogma: A Systematic Review. Am J Med. 2022;135(3):369-79.e1. [CrossRef]
  92. Shrayteh ZM, Rahal MK, Malaeb DN. Practice of switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics. Springerplus. 2014;3:717. [CrossRef]
  93. Nguyen PT, Tran HT, Fitzgerald DA, Graham SM, Marais BJ. Antibiotic use in children hospitalised with pneumonia in Central Vietnam. Arch Dis Child. 2020;105(8):713-9. [CrossRef]
  94. Davey P, Marwick CA, Scott CL, Charani E, McNeil K, Brown E, et al. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2(2):Cd003543. [CrossRef]
  95. Van Dijck C, Vlieghe E, Cox JA. Antibiotic stewardship interventions in hospitals in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96(4):266-80. [CrossRef]
  96. Saleem Z, Moore CE, Kalungia AC, Schellack N, Ogunleye O, Chigome A, et al. Status and implications of the knowledge, attitudes and practices towards AWaRe antibiotic use, resistance and stewardship among low- and middle-income countries. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance. 2025;7(2). [CrossRef]
  97. Kerr, F.; Sefah, I.A.; Essah, D.O.; Cockburn, A.; Afriyie, D.; Mahungu, J.; Mirfenderesky, M.; Ankrah, D.; Aggor, A.; Barrett, S.; et al. Practical Pharmacist-Led Interventions to Improve Antimicrobial Stewardship in Ghana, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia. Pharmacy. 2021;9(3). [CrossRef]
  98. Sefah IA, Chetty S, Yamoah P, Bangalee V. The impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on appropriate use of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Systematic Reviews. 2024;13(1):306. [CrossRef]
  99. Pinto Jimenez C, Pearson M, Hennessey M, Nkereuwem E, Crocker C, Egbujo U, et al. Awareness of antibiotic resistance: a tool for measurement among human and animal health care professionals in LMICs and UMICs. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023;78(3):620-35. [CrossRef]
  100. GSS. Ghana 2021 Population and Housing Census. Ghana Statistical Services. Available at URL: https://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/ghana-population-and-housing-census-2021#:~:text=The%20Ghana%202021%20Population%20and%20Housing%20Census%20was,2021%20and%20recorded%20a%20total%20population%20of%2030%2C832%2C019. (Accessed 1 March 2025).
  101. Versporten A, Zarb P, Caniaux I, Gros MF, Drapier N, Miller M, et al. Antimicrobial consumption and resistance in adult hospital inpatients in 53 countries: results of an internet-based global point prevalence survey. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(6):e619-e29. [CrossRef]
  102. Global PPS. Documents. Available at URL: https://www.global-pps.com/documents/ (Accesssed 5 February 2025).
  103. WHO. Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification. 2021. Available at URL: https://www.who.int/tools/atc-ddd-toolkit/atc-classification (Accessed 6 February 2025).
  104. Chizimu JY, Mudenda S, Yamba K, Lukwesa C, Chanda R, Nakazwe R, et al. Antibiotic use and adherence to the WHO AWaRe guidelines across 16 hospitals in Zambia: a point prevalence survey. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024;6(5):dlae170. [CrossRef]
  105. Foxlee ND, Townell N, Heney C, McIver L, Lau CL. Strategies Used for Implementing and Promoting Adherence to Antibiotic Guidelines in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2021;6(3).
Table 1. Sociodemographic, clinical characteristics and their association with guideline compliance.
Table 1. Sociodemographic, clinical characteristics and their association with guideline compliance.
Variable Total, n (%) Compliance to the Guideline p-value
Age (years) Mean ± SD 2.39 ± 2.99 Yes, n (%) No, n (%)
Duration of Admission (days) - Mean ± SD 9.14 ± 10.73
Duration of Antibiotics (days) - Mean ± SD 3.03 ± 2.43
   Age (years) (n=319)
   0-2
   3-5
   6-8
   9-11

219 (68.65)
53 (16.61)
26 (8.15)
21 (6.58)

99 (45.21)
20 (37.74)
10 (38.46)
6 (28.57)

120 (54.79)
33 (62.26)
16 (61.54)
15 (71.43)
0.393
   Gender (n=319)
   Male
   Female

174 (54.55)
145 (45.45)

76 (43.68)
59 (40.69)

98 (56.32)
86 (59.31)
0.591
   Residence (n=318)
   Rural
   Urban
   Peri-Urban

149 (46.86)
144 (45.28)
25 (7.86)

62 (41.61)
61 (42.36)
12 (48.00)

87 (58.39)
83 (57.64)
13 (52.00)
0.836
   Duration of Admission (days) (n=319)
   1-5
   5-10
   >10

153 (47.96)
87 (27.27)
79 (24.76)

69 (45.10)
36 (41.38)
30 (37.97)

84 (54.90)
51 (58.62)
49 (62.03)
0.569
Treatment Based on Biomarker (n=319) 0.304
   Yes 308 (96.55) 132 (42.86) 176 (57.14)
   No 11 (3.45) 3 (27.27) 8 (72.72)
If Yes, (n=308) 0.262
   WBC 128 (41.56) 49 (38.28) 79 (61.72)
   WBC + CRP 81 (26.30) 38 (46.91) 43 (53.09)
   WBC + Urine R/E 58 (18.83) 25 (43.10) 33 (56.90)
   WBC + CRP + Urine R/E 20 (6.49) 7 (35.00) 13 (65.00)
   Other 21 (6.82) 13 (61.90) 8 (38.10)
Number of Antibiotics (n=319) 0.546
   1 120 (37.62) 46 (38.33) 74 (61.67)
   2 181 (56.74) 83 (45.86) 98 (54.14)
   3 15 (4.71) 5 (33.33) 10 (66.67)
   4 3 (0.93) 1 (33.33) 2 (66.67)
Antibiotic Type (n=319) <0.001*
   Ceftriaxone 66 (20.69) 24 (36.36) 42 (63.64)
   Cefotaxime + flucloxacillin 51 (15.99) 0 (0.00) 51 (100.00)
   Ampicillin + gentamicin 48 (15.05) 48 (100.00) 0 (0.00)
   Amoxicillin + clavulanic Acid 24 (7.52) 10 (41.67) 14 (58.33)
   Ceftriaxone + metronidazole 21 (6.58) 9 (42.86) 12 (57.14)
   Other^ 109 (34.17) 44 (40.37) 65 (59.63)
WHO AWaRe Category (n=317) <0.001*
   Access 86 (27.13) 63 (73.26) 23 (26.74)
   Watch 95 (29.97) 40 (42.10) 55 (57.89)
   Access + Watch 136 (42.90) 32 (23.53) 104 (76.47)
Route of Administration (n=319) 0.009*
   Intravenous 264 (82.76) 108 (40.91) 156 (59.09)
   Oral 15 (4.70) 6 (40.00) 9 (60.00)
   Topical 5 (1.57) 0 (0) 5 (100.00)
   Intravenous + Oral 27 (8.46) 19 (70.37) 8 (29.63)
   Other 8 (2.51) 2 (25.00) 6 (75.00)
Diagnosis (n=319) <0.001*
   Neonatal Sepsis 77 (24.14) 33 (42.86) 44 (57.14)
   Neonatal Jaundice due to sepsis 18 (5.64) 11 (61.11) 7 (38.89)
   Pneumonia 46 (14.42) 39 (84.78) 7 (15.22)
   Surgical Wound Prophylaxis 46 (14.42) 2 (4.35) 44 (95.65)
   Tonsillitis 17 (5.33) 11 (64.71) 6 (35.29)
   Other# 115 (36.05) 44 (38.26) 71 (61.74)
NB: p-values with the asterisk (*) symbol are statistically significant; # - other diagnosis included bacteria gastroenteritis (n=6, 1.88%), cellulitis (n=6, 1.88%), acute chest syndrome (n=5, 1.57%), vaso-occlusive crisis (n=5, 1.57%), burns (n=3, 0.94%), acute gastritis (n=3, 0.94%), chronic osteomyelitis (n=2, 0.63%), urinary tract infections (n=1, 0.31%)and cord sepsis (n=1, 0.31%); ^ - other antibiotics included amoxicillin + clavulanic acid + azithromycin (n=6, 1.88%), ciprofloxacin + metronidazole (n=6, 1.88%), ciprofloxacin (n=5, 1.57%), ciprofloxacin + clindamycin (n=4, 1.25%), benzylpenicillin (n=3, 0.94%), phenoxymethylpenicillin (n=3, 0.94%), amoxicillin (n=2, 0.63%), ceftriazone + azithromycin + flucloxacillin (n=2, 0.63%) ceftriazone + clindamycin + metronidazole (n=2, 0.63%), cefuroxime + clindamycin (n=2, 0.63%),and metronidazole (n=2, 0.63%); AWaRe = Access, Watch, Reserve; WBC = White blood count; CRP = C-reactive protein; R/E = Routine examination.
Table 2. Logistic regression between independent variables.
Table 2. Logistic regression between independent variables.
Variable aOR 95% CI p-value
Antibiotic Name
   Amoxicillin + Clavulanic Acid (R) 1.00
   Ceftriaxone 0.12 0.02-0.95 0.044*
   Cefotaxime + Flucloxacillin 1.00
   Ampicillin + Gentamicin 1.00
   Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole 0.38 0.05-3.09 0.368
   Other 0.35 0.07-1.86 0.220
WHO AWaRe Category
   Access (R) 1.00
   Watch 1.28 0.27-5.97 0.757
   Access + Watch 4.86 0.12-1.95 0.309
Route of Administration
   Intravenous (R) 1.00
   Oral 0.54 0.14-2.03 0.361
   Topical 1.00
   Intravenous + Oral 1.26 0.38-4.16 0.703
   Other 0.38 0.05-2.61 0.322
Diagnosis
   Neonatal Sepsis (R) 1.00
   Neonatal Jaundice due to sepsis 1.00
   Pneumonia 15.38 3.30-71.62 <0.001*
   Surgical Wound Prophylaxis 0.07 0.01-0.42 0.004*
   Tonsillitis 1.00
   Other 1.80 0.50-6.53 0.371
NB: p-values with the asterisk (*) symbol are statistically significant; AWaRe = Access, Watch, Reserve [32]; R = Reference variable.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated