Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Extraction and Characterization of Tannins from the Barks of Four Tropical Wood Species and Formulation of Bio-Resins for Potential Industrial Applications

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

09 June 2025

Posted:

10 June 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
This study explores the extraction of tannins from the barks of four tropical wood species (Entandophragma candolei, Entandophragma cylindricum, Afzelia africana and Dacryodes klaineana) and their use in formulating bio-resins. The tannin extraction yield varied between 25 and 40%. The tannins were characterized by 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (13C NMR), Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-Of-Flight (MALDI-TOF) and Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA). The associated bio-resins, formulated with an Acacia nilotica hardener, were evaluated in terms of thermal stability, gel time, and modulus of elasticity. The results reveal significant chemical and thermal variability depending on the wood species. The tannin-based resin from E. candolei exhibits the best thermal stability (final residue 36.72% at 600°C), while the one based on E. cylindricum shows the best modulus of elasticity (5268 MPa). These tannins represent promising alternatives for bio-based adhesives.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Recent research reveals that interest in the production of bio-polymers, as a sustainable alternative to industrial sector expansion, is driven by environmental concerns related to the use of petroleum-derived products [1]. According to the document titled “Global Market for Bioplastics and Biopolymers 2023,” the market for bioplastics and biopolymers is projected to reach $27.3 billion by 2027 [2]. This discovery opens perspectives for the development of new biomaterials derived from responsible natural resource management. Tannins are a category of natural polyphenols, which constitute the second most abundant source in nature, after lignin. These compounds are commonly found in various parts of plants, including fruits, wood, leaves, and bark. Following extensive research, the formulation of tannin bio-resins has been developed. These are commonly used in various industrial sectors, particularly in the manufacture of particleboard and fiberboard. It has been demonstrated that, due to their superior reactivity compared to phenols, these compounds provide adhesion performance comparable to that of synthetic resins [3,4]. Furthermore, they possess remarkable antioxidant, antibacterial, adhesive, and antimicrobial properties [5]. Moreover, their environmental impact is lower. According to [6] the taxonomy of tannins is based on four categories: condensed tannins (CT), hydrolysable tannins (HT), phlorotannins (PhT), and complex tannins. It has been demonstrated that 90% of the global commercial tannin production consists of CT. These tannins are distinguished by oligomeric structures comprising specific monomers, including catechin, epicatechin, gallocatechins, and epigallocatechins. Currently, global commercial tannin production amounts to approximately 220,000 tons per year. As highlighted by [7], production capacity is unable to meet the growing industrial demand.
Cameroonian forests, covering an area of 22,000 hectares, thus represent 42% of the country's land area. These forests harbor remarkable biodiversity, with a plant diversity of 300 tree species, 80 of which are exploited by logging companies. These activities result in the annual production of over 1.2 million tons of residues, as revealed by studies from [8]. It should be emphasized that the majority of higher plants present in this biomass potentially contain tannins. However, a significant concentration of tannins has been observed in tree bark [9]. Several research works have focused on the extraction of tannins from various Cameroonian tree barks. Within the scope of this research, several species belonging to the Anigeria spp. family have been identified, notably Aningeria superba [10], Autranella congolensis, Ficus sycomorus [11], Ficus platyphylla and Vitellaria paradoxa [12]. In 2020, the species Gilbertiodendron dewevrei was characterized by [13]. Subsequently, Konai [14] studied Azadirachta indica, Daniellia oliveri [15]. Wedaïna [8] conducted an in-depth study on Monopetalanthus durandii, and focused on Piptadeniastrum Africanum. For the same purpose, three other recent plant species have been studied: Aningeria altissima [16], Cissus dinklagei [17] and Paraberlinia bifiololata [18]. These studies led to the conclusion that there is potential for resin production in all the species studied.
The structural diversity and variability in molecular weights of tannins give rise to highly heterogeneous materials. These materials are derived from extracts and frequently lead to non-reproducible processes. Thus, much research utilizes clearly defined and controlled commercial monomers, derived from tannin extraction and purification processes, such as tannic acid, catechol, resorcinol, and catechin [6,19]. However, the use of these monomers can be costly when scaling up the technology, posing challenges for their replacement with alternatives to fossil-based polymers [20]. To make the project cost-effective, it is advisable to use unpurified tannin extracts. Concurrently, a thorough analysis will ensure the consistency of the characteristics of the obtained materials. To achieve this, scientists have employed a plurality of methods for characterizing polyphenols. These approaches include colorimetric, spectrometric, and thermal methodologies. Furthermore, the analysis of formulated resins is primarily conducted through mechanical, thermomechanical, and thermal tests [16,18,21]. This research has highlighted the multiple properties of tannins, which justify their use in various industrial sectors.
Due to their specific characteristics, tannins find applications in different industrial sectors. For example, CT exhibit very high shrinkage temperatures, which facilitates leather tanning [22]. Furthermore, tannins enhance resistance against fungi and termites, thereby offering protection as preservatives [23]. This characteristic gives them a role in the field of preservation [24]. Additionally, tannins are recognized for their ability to improve the durability of wood composites and enhance adhesives, positioning them as materials of choice in the wood and plastic assembly industry [25,26]. Tannins, due to their inhibitory properties, provide protection for metals against corrosion [27,28]. Due to their high aptitude for coagulation and adsorption of methylene blue and heavy metals, tannins possess adsorption characteristics [29,30]. These diverse characteristics underscore the growing interest in tannins as an ecological alternative in industrial sectors. In this context, the present study aims to identify new sources of tropical tannins, evaluate their chemical and thermal properties, and formulate bio-based resins suitable for industrial applications, particularly in the manufacture of panels and ecological inhibitors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

2.1.1. Ecological Hardening Agents

The Acacia nilotica hardener was used in the resin formulation. Initially, Acacia nilotica exudates were collected from the Dacheka forest, located in the Far North Region of Cameroon. After being dried at room temperature for two weeks, they became a soluble powder through grinding and are termed hardener. This process facilitates their packaging and incorporation into the formulation of various resins [16,31].

2.1.2. Tannin Extraction

During the month of November, bark samples were collected from four wood specimens (Entandophragma cylindricum, Entandophragma candolei, Afzelia africana, and Dacryodes klaineana) at the logging and wood processing company TRANSBOIS, located in the industrial zone of Douala, in the Littoral Region of Cameroon. Bark collection was carried out selectively, with each tree species being packaged in 50 kg bags. Once collected, a drying process was implemented. The barks were individually air-dried at room temperature (28 °C) for a period of 7 days. Subsequently, they were reduced to very small particles. For the experiment, fine bark particles of each species, extracted from the anhydrous mass, were immersed in an aqueous solution. This solution contained 2% sodium bisulfite and 0.5% sodium bicarbonate. The solid:liquid ratio was 1:6 (v/v). The solution was heated to a temperature of 60 °C and then constantly stirred for four hours. For the study, the solution was filtered through a cotton cloth to obtain a filtered liquid whose color varied depending on the species. The recovered liquid fraction underwent an evaporation process at a temperature of 60 °C, leading to the formation of tannin crystals. For analysis and preservation, it is necessary to have an easier-to-use tannin powder. To achieve this, the crystals were ground into powder using a ceramic mortar [14,16,32]. The extraction yield is then calculated using Equation Eq1:
p e r c e n t a g e = m tan n i n m b a r k s × 100
where: m tan n i n is the mass of the extracted tannin powder
m b a r k s : is the mass of the bark powder taken for extraction

2.2. Tannin Characterization

2.2.1. 13C NMR Analysis

A Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy analysis was performed on the carbon-13 atom in the liquid phase. The spectra were recorded on a Brüker Advance 400 MHz spectrometer, a state-of-the-art instrument in spectroscopy. Chemical shifts were meticulously calculated relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS), the absolute reference in the field. It is important to note that the spectra manifest at 100.6 MHz. The number of scans and acquisition times were 1.36 seconds and 12,000 seconds, respectively. In the ongoing research on the tannin extract, it was dissolved in a deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d6) solution, a compound chemically defined as deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide [33].

2.2.2. MALDI-TOF Analysis

In the experiment, 10 milligrams of powder from each of the analyzed tannins were used. For the experiment, the tannin powder, at a concentration of 2 mg/mL, was dissolved in 2 mL of acetone. This solution was then mixed with another solution containing 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid and acetone at a concentration of 10 mg/mL. Finally, ion formation was stimulated by adding sodium chloride (NaCl) to the matrix. Approximately 0.5 liters of the mixed solution was deposited on the Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-Of-Flight/Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/MS) target and introduced into the spectrometer after solvent evaporation [11,13,32].

2.2.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis of Tannin

In this study, the NETZSCH STA 449 F3 Jupiter analyzer was used to evaluate the thermal stability and decomposition of tannins. In this experimental protocol, a precise quantity of sample powder, with an exact mass between 20 ± 1 mg, was deposited on a platinum platform. Then, the sample was heated from 25 °C to 600 °C, at a heating rate of 20 K.min-1, under a nitrogen atmosphere, thus allowing optimal control of the thermodynamic conditions of the experiment [16,33].

2.3. Resin Characterization

2.3.1. Resin Formulation

An aqueous solution was prepared by mixing 40% tannin powder extracted from each previously mentioned wood species with 40% water and 10% natural exudates of Acacia nilotica. The potential of hydrogen (pH) of the mixture was adjusted to 8 by introducing a 33% sodium hydroxide solution [32,34].

2.3.2. Physical Characterization of Resins: Gel Time

Approximately 10 g of the formulated resin without the addition of a sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution (33% NaOH) is introduced into a test tube and placed in a water bath, maintained at boiling temperature (100 °C) at normal atmospheric pressure. A metal spring is inserted into the test tube and moved rapidly up and down. The gel time is measured using a stopwatch. The test is performed three times, and the average value is reported by [31]. Then the resin is formulated by adding a sodium hydroxide solution (33% NaOH) to adjust the different pH levels of the mixture. [31].

2.3.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis of Resins

For this study, the NETZSCH STA 449 F3 Jupiter analyzer was used to evaluate the thermal stability and decomposition of the formulated resins. In this experimental protocol, a precise quantity of sample powder, with an exact mass between 20 ± 1 mg, was deposited on a platinum platform. Then, the sample was heated from 25 °C to 600 °C, at a heating rate of 20 K.min-1, under a nitrogen atmosphere, thus allowing optimal control of the thermodynamic conditions of the experiment [33].

2.3.4. Thermomechanical Analysis of the Resin

This method, aimed at characterizing resins, allows for the analysis of interactions between the polymer and various molecules. It also provides data regarding the rigidity of the resin as a function of temperature (Konai et al., 2015a). Sample preparation involves placing 25 milligrams of specifically prepared resin between two smooth plates measuring 21 millimeters in length, 6 millimeters in width, and 1.1 millimeters in thickness. They are then fixed and inserted into a Mettler Toledo 40 Thermomechanical Analyzer (TMA) (MettlerToledo, Zurich, Switzerland). The beech-resin-beech sandwiches were subjected to non-isothermal tests, with a temperature range from 25 °C to 250 °C, at a heating rate of 10 °C/minute. The area covered by the adhesive on the panels is 200 g/m2. These mentioned plates are decorative beech wood veneers of medium density (0.750 g/cm3), with a thickness of 0.5 mm and a moisture content of 11% (Konai et al., 2021). The samples underwent three-point bending tests over a span of 18 mm, with the application of a force cycle of 0.1/0.5 N and a force cycle of 12 s (6 s/6 s). The mechanical relationship between force and deformation is
E = L 3 4 b h 3 × F Δ f b o i s Δ f a d h e s i f
where E: is Young's modulus; L: is the span length; b and h: are the width and thickness of the specimen, respectively; F is the force exerted on the assembly; Δf wood and Δf adhesive are the deflections which have been proven constant and reproducible (Das et al., 2020). The tested formulations are therefore those prepared with the different extracted tannins.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Tannin Extraction Yield from Different Woods

The analysis of tannin extraction yield from the different wood barks showed that the values range between 25% and 40%. Indeed, Entandophragma cylindrycum (SPL) (35%) and Entandophragma candolei (KSP) (40%), belonging to the Meliaceae family, are characterized by a remarkably high extraction yield. In second place is Afzelia africana (DSS) (33%), from the Fabaceae family, closely followed by Dacryodes klaineana (ADB) (25%), a species from the Burseraceae family. It should be noted that tannin extraction was carried out under identical conditions, leading to the deduction that the observed disparities are due to the phenolic compound concentration specific to each bark type. The barks of species belonging to the Meliaceae family are distinguished by their scaly texture, the presence of lenticels, and an intense fragrant odor. This is also the case for the Afzelia africana species, whose bark has similar characteristics and emits a strong odor of plantain peel. [35]. These specificities could thus justify the superior performance observed in the species of these two groups compared to that of the Burseraceae. According to Scalbert [36], the bark of Pedunculate Oak (Quercus robur L.) was characterized by a phenolic compound yield of 28.7%. Furthermore, for species such as Daniellia oliveri, Ficus sycomorus, Butyrospermum parkii, and Azadirachta indica, the results obtained are 29%, 46%, 40%, and 35% respectively [15]. The comparison of these results with those found in this study simply shows that SPL, KSP, DSS, and ADB barks are potential sources of polyphenols and tannins.

3.2. Chemical Structures of Molecules Identified in the Samples

The 13C NMR spectra of tannin extracted from wood bark samples of SPL, KSP, DSS, and ADB species were subjected to detailed analysis (Figure 1). This study highlighted the presence of various characteristic peaks identified in all examined tannins. The peak at 154 parts per million (ppm) is related to the vibrations of C9, C7, C5 of flavonoids, while the peaks at 144 ppm and 145 ppm represent the vibrations of the C3' and C4' rings in procyanidins [18]. The C1' vibrations of flavonoids are found at peaks 129, 130, and 131 ppm at C4' of prodelphinidins (Njom et al., 2024) . The 116 and 118 ppm peaks reflect the vibrations of the C5' and C2' bonds of procyanidins (Njom et al., 2024) . The C4-C8 interflavonoid linkage is identified between the 108 and 109 ppm peaks depending on the species. The 104 ppm peak observed in KSP and DSS is the signal related to the C6-C8 linkages of flavonoids [18]. The 80, 81, and 82 ppm peaks indicate the presence of C2 linkages of flavonoids in the KSP, DSS, and ADB samples. The presence of the C-O-C function is revealed by peaks at 72 ppm in DSS and 74 ppm in KSP. The peaks at 24 and 11 ppm correspond respectively to free C4 and to the steric –CH2 and aliphatic –CH3 linkages of flavonoids [18].
The tannin spectrum of KSP (Figure 1a) showed peculiarities for certain peaks. The peak at 180 ppm is identified as corresponding to the –COOH function linked to a non-aromatic ring, while the peaks at 173 ppm and 168 ppm are respectively associated with the –C=O of an aliphatic and cyclic ester. The peak at 145 ppm is indicated by the C5 site of the furanic acid, prieuridine, and azadiradrone rings. This observation is supported by the emergence of the peak at 134 ppm, which relates to the C2 vibration of these recognized compounds. The peak at 74 ppm concerns the C-O bond, linked to molecules such as aziridones and flavonoids. Furthermore, the existence of characteristic peaks of prieuridine is also observed. The peak at 37 ppm is linked to catechinic acid, while the peak at 30 ppm concerns the C6 bond of aziridone. Furthermore, the tannin revealed new elements such as furanic acid, which belongs to the amino acid category, as well as prieuridine and aziridone, classified as alkaloids.
Furthermore, the analysis of the tannin spectrum of SPL (Figure 1c) allowed for the identification of specific peaks. In particular, the peak at 181 ppm is linked to the –COOH connection of strongly protonated acetic acid, derived from hemicelluloses. Indeed, this band should appear at 178 ppm, but its identification at 181 ppm indicates degradation of hemicelluloses during extraction. This variation may also be due to the presence of glucuronic or galacturonic acids, resulting from carbohydrate degradation, forming hemicellulose segments. Furthermore, the value of 147 ppm indicates the presence of –COOH, while 168 ppm is related to the –COOH of gallic acid. The peak at 74 ppm is characteristic of sugar oligomers, while the peak at 36 ppm corresponds to the carbon atom vibrations of Tau-Cadinol, alpha-copaene, and gamma-cadinene. The peak at 30 ppm is linked to the C4 of flavonoids and the CH2 groups of Tau-Cadinol, while the peak at 18 ppm represents the CH3 groups of Tau-Cadinol, alpha-copaene, and gamma-cadinene.
Regarding the tannin profile of DSS (Figure 1d), the notable observed peaks are at 174 ppm; 56 ppm; 40 ppm; 36 ppm and 22 ppm. The peak at 174 ppm indicates the presence of substances such as eriodictyol and methoxyeriodiol, which are sterols. The peak at 56 ppm corresponds to the methyl group –OCH3 found in methoxyeriodictyol. The peak at 40.9 ppm is associated with the C3-H group of eriodictyol. The peaks at 36 ppm and 22.7 ppm indicate the presence of eriodictyol and methoxyeriodictyol, either alone or in combination with other flavonoids. Regarding the flavonoid tannin peaks, particularly those of C5, C7, and C9, which are generally located at 154 ppm, it was noted that the peak intensity is more pronounced. This is because it is an isolated peak for three carbon atoms, rather than the usual two peaks. The peak at 144 ppm indicates the highest concentration noted for C3' and C4' compounds. The C1 of flavonoids is associated with a value of 129.7 ppm. The peak at 116 ppm indicates the highest concentration of C2' and C5' for flavonoids such as catechin or fisetinidin (hemicellulose residues).
Furthermore, the 13C NMR spectrum analysis of tannin from ADB (Figure 1b) reveals the following distinct peaks: 180; 174; 73; 39; 27; 19 and 14 ppm. The peak at 180 ppm is associated with the –COOH group of protonated acid, originating from hemicellulose degradation. The peak at 174 ppm is linked to the C=O group of xanthones, while the peak at 73 ppm concerns carbohydrates, related to hemicellulose fragments. Finally, the peak at 55 ppm is associated with a –CH3 group linked to an O. The values of 39.8, 24.7, 19.9, and 14.8 ppm are associated with the compound’s beta-amyrin, quercetin 3-O-alpha-L-rhamnoside, or the methyl ester of trihydroxy olean-12-en-28-oic acid. The identification of various signals related to phenolic hydroxyl groups confirms the condensed nature of each tannin examined [37].

3.3. Structural Determination of Molecules from Different Tannin Samples

MALDI-TOF analyses of tannin from the wood barks of SPL, KSP, DSS, and ADB species show similar and distinct oligomers. Let us present the main oligomers identified in each tannin sample.
For the DSS sample, the peak at 177 Da refers to a molecule Syringaldehyde fragment with loss of 5xH found among forestry by-products in this sample [38]. 192 Da corresponds to protonated gallic acid. At 199 Da, we have the new molecule (177) bound to Na+. 274 Da corresponds to the structure of fisetinidin detached from Na+. The peak at 309 Da corresponds either to deprotonated Eriodictyol bound to Na+, or to protonated anthraquinone bound to Na+ (the structures(b)). 326 is protonated Eriodictyol or a labile H of the –OH functional group has been replaced by the –CH3 alkyl group (structure(c). 352 Da = no Na+, deprotonated. This is a fragment of a flavonoid dimer like the structures at 193 Da above that were isolated in previous analyses. 449 Da corresponds to the Catechin-3xH dimer linked to glucose [39]. The peaks 553, 575, and 577 Da correspond respectively to the Robinetinidin-Trihydroxyflavan +7H+ dimer and deprotonated Gallocatechin (-H+ for 575 Da and -3H+ for 577 Da (Athomo et al., 2018). The peaks at 581.5 and 584 Da correspond respectively to fisetinidin-eriodictyol and fisetinidin-catechin dimers, all bound to Na+. The 625 Da peak corresponds to the Isoquercetin gallate +5H+ peak, and 709 Da corresponds to the trimer of Fisetinidin, Gallocatechin, and Gallic acid [39]. 758 Da corresponds to the trimer of Gallic acid, Trihydroxyflavan, and glucose hydrate. The peaks 772 Da protonated with Na+, 801 Da without Na+, indicate the presence of a trihydroxyflavan and fisetinidin dimer (-8H+ for 772 Da) and (-2H+ for 801). 846 Da corresponds to a fisetinidin-catechin-eriodictyol trimer, deprotonated without Na+. 889 Da is a catechin trimer, bound to Na+.
Preprints 162933 i001
For the ADB tannin, the following peaks were interpreted: 137 Da without Na+, 159 Da with Na+. These correspond to the following Terpenes: (1) Alpha-Thujene; (2) alpha-pinene; (3) camphene; (4) Sabinene; (5) beta-pinene; (6) alpha-phellandrene; (7) alpha-terpinene; (8) gamma-terpinene. 177 Da bound to Na+ corresponds to the following terpenic structures: (9) 1,8-Cineole; (10) cis-Sabinene hydrate; (11) Terpinen-4-ol; (12) alpha-terpineol (g). The 192.8 Da peak is that of gallic acid bound to Na+. 196 Da corresponds to Xanthone in the absence of Na+. 326 Da = with Na+, either(a) deprotonated delphinidin, or(b) 9-(4-methoxyphenyl) xanthene (second most probable hypothesis) or both(h). 449 Da = with Na+, beta-amyrin; or without Na+ quercetin 3-O-Alpha-L-Rhamnoside(i). 509 Da = with Na+, deprotonated, methyl ester of 2,3,23-trihydroxyolean-12-en-28-oic acid new molecule(j). 575-577 Da = no Na+, Sitosterol-3-O-Beta-D-glucopyranoside sterol, (576 Da), protonated (577 Da) and deprotonated (575), and/or, or both catechin dimers, deprotonated (577) no Na+(k). 585 Da corresponds to a non-protonated catechin-fisetinidin dimer without Na+. The 595, 619 Da peaks protonated bound to Na+ correspond to the catechin-delphinidin dimer; 611 Da without Na+, protonated corresponds to the delphinidin-delphinidin dimer. 729Da corresponds to a fisetinidin dimer without Na+ bound to glucose molecules. 745 Da is a Catechin-Fisetinidin dimer bound to glucose molecules associated with Na+ and deprotonated. 760Da is a catechin dimer attached to glucose molecules. 921Da is a delphinidin-delphinidin-catechin trimer attached to Na+.
Preprints 162933 i002
The following peaks allowed for the interpretation of the MALDI-TOF spectrum of SPL. The 192Da peak corresponds to gallic acid bound to Na+ [8], 204 Da = no Na+, small peak of alpha-copaene (1l) or gamma-cadinene (2l), or both mixed(m). 223 Da corresponds to Tau-Cadinol, protonated and bound to Na+(n). The 273 Da peak is that of fisetinidin, without Na+. 309 Da no Na+, protonated delphinidin (307 Da) (1), or with Na+, deprotonated eriodictyol (310) (2) or both(n). 405 Da is the Cadinol peak attached to glucose and Na+. The 443 Da peak is that of Catechin gallate, without Na+. 493 Da corresponds to protonated delphinidin bound to glucose and Na+. 501 Da is the peak of fisetinidin esterified by tau cadinol without Na+,(o). 549 Da is a deprotonated fisetinidin-fisetinidin dimer without Na+. 577 Da is either a deprotonated delphinidin-fisetinidin dimer without Na+, or/and a catechin-catechin dimer. The 581, 595 Da peaks correspond respectively to the deprotonated catechin-fisetinidin dimer without Na+ and the delphinidin-catechin dimer without Na+ [8], protonated, or of fisetinidin-(glucose)2 without Na+. The 625-627 Da peak corresponds to delphinidin-(glucose)2 without Na+ [8]. 713 Da corresponds to the fisetinidin-fisetinidin-glucose structure, protonated without Na+ [8]. 757 Da corresponds to the catechin-delphinidin-glucose structure without Na+ [8]. 765 Da is delphinidin-fisetinidin-glucose, protonated bound to Na+. 889 Da corresponds to a catechin trimer, bound to Na+. 1175 Da is a glucose heptamer bound to Na+ or of glucose-mannose, which is a hemicellulose fragment. 2015-2016 Da is a catechin heptamer, in the absence of Na+. 2306 Da is a catechin octamer, without Na+.
Preprints 162933 i003
The following peaks caught our attention in the interpretation of the MALDI-TOF spectrum of KSP; the 199Da peak is that of N-methyl 5-dihydroxypipecolic acid (p) (Nga et al., 2024a). 231 Da is attributed to deprotonated Chalcone; 273 Da is fisetinidin, without Na+; 295 is attributed to the protonated catechin monomer. The 326 Da peak is that of protonated Eriodictyol (c). 377Da corresponds to Dihydroxyflavan-3-(3,4-dihydroxy)-benzoate [38]. 413Da is attributed to the deprotonated Chalcone dimer [8]; 449 Da corresponds to the dihydroxypipecolic acid trimer [18]. (q). The peak at 493 corresponds to the Quercetin-gallate monomer bound to Na+. 575 Da corresponds to the Gallocatechin dimer –Na+, deprotonated. 669 Da is the pentamer of N-methyl 4-hydroxypipecolic(r) (Nga et al., 2024a). 753 Da corresponds to catechin-delphinidin-glucose, without Na+, deprotonated [8]. The 827Da peak is that of the deprotonated Chalcone tetramer [8]. The peak at 1579Da is that of Fisetinidin/ trihydroxyflavan, protonated [38].
Figure 2. MALDI-TOF spectrum between 0-500Da.
Figure 2. MALDI-TOF spectrum between 0-500Da.
Preprints 162933 g002aPreprints 162933 g002b
Figure 3. MALDI-TOF spectrum between 100 and 1000 Da.
Figure 3. MALDI-TOF spectrum between 100 and 1000 Da.
Preprints 162933 g003aPreprints 162933 g003b
Figure 4. MALDI-TOF spectrum between 1000-3500Da.
Figure 4. MALDI-TOF spectrum between 1000-3500Da.
Preprints 162933 g004aPreprints 162933 g004b

3.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis of Tannins and Resins

The TG/DTG curves of crude tannins ADB, DSS, KSP, and SPL, as well as those of the tannin resins ADBN, DSSN, KSPN, and SPLN (Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8) under nitrogen, allowed for the identification of the main stages of the thermal decomposition mechanism of the adhesives.
The analysis of ADB tannin (Figure 5b) revealed three distinct phases: a first phase of water and volatile evaporation at a temperature of 95°C, followed by a second phase of heteropolysaccharide and glycosidic bond degradation at a temperature of 275°C. A third phase of polyphenolic structure breakdown was then observed at a temperature of 525°C. At 600°C, a high char yield (45.05 %) [37] is obtained, probably due to the aromatic nature of the tannin and the presence of minerals such as silica (Santoso et al., 2016; Amari et al., 2021). Concurrently, the analysis of the ADBN resin (Figure 5a) reveals an initial water loss at 95°C, volatilization of small molecules at 275°C, and major degradation beyond 600°C. The analysis of the final residue (32.41 % at 625°C) allows for the conclusion of the presence of a complex polymer structure. The incorporation of the hardener into the composition of the studied material has the effect of increasing thermal stability, reducing low-temperature losses, and promoting effective crosslinking.
Furthermore, the thermal study of the DSS/DSSN pair reveals notable disparities in terms of stability. The DSSN resin (Figure 6a) undergoes four degradation phases. The first significant magnitude corresponds to a loss of 40.80 % after 30 minutes of exposure. Continuing this observation, it is noted that additional reductions are observed at 45 and 60 minutes, leading to a total loss of 68.23 %. Indeed, the DSS tannin (Figure 6b) exhibits superior thermal resistance, characterized by more gradual losses, reaching 56.82 % and a more substantial final residue (43.18 %) [40,41]. These results suggest that the crude DSS tannin exhibits superior thermal stability compared to its DSSN resin. However, the introduction of the Acacia nilotica hardener induces intense crosslinking, but it also promotes the formation of bonds that are more fragile when exposed to heat. Thus, the choice of hardener must be meticulously adapted according to the final application.
Furthermore, the KSP tannin (Figure 7a) exhibits a moderate initial loss of 7.08 %, followed by two major degradations at 41.72 % and 29.47 %, leading to a residue of 30.80 %, a sign of a highly refractory structure. Moreover, the KSPN resin (Figure 7b) undergoes a more complex degradation, in several phases (7.93 %, 36.71 %, 15.45 %, and 7.41 %), due to the progressive breaking of bonds between tannin and hardener. The final residue of 36.72 % is a sign of a more advanced decomposition of the polymer matrix [40,41]. These discrepancies highlight the determining impact of the crosslinking agent, in this case Acacia nilotica, on thermal stability. The modification of the polymer network structure induces a more elaborate architecture of the resin. However, we have a more elaborate polymer network and better crosslinking of the KSPN resin during the thermal decomposition process.
The analysis of the SPL tannin [40,41]) reveals the presence of five distinct stages of thermal decomposition. The two highest peaks are attributable to water evaporation and the degradation of light elements, while the next three peaks are correlated with the progressive degradation of the polyphenolic structure, resulting in a significant final loss of 7.94 %. The observation of a secondary exothermic peak supports the hypothesis of partial combustion of carbonaceous residues [41]. Data analysis reveals that the final residue of 35.70 % indicates thermal stability deemed satisfactory [42].
In contrast, the SPLN resin (Figure 8b) exhibits a more crosslinked structure, but lower thermal stability, with three main degradation phases and a lower residue (21.84 %). An unusual exothermic peak observed on the SPLN curve could indicate a calibration error or a secondary recombination phenomenon. It emerges from the study conducted that, in general, the SPL tannin exhibits superior thermal resistance. This property is attributable to the aromatic nature of the tannin structures. In contrast, the resin, despite more significant degradation, exhibits homogeneous crosslinking.
Table 1 summarizes the performance of each of the materials studied in this research. It appears that the KSPN resin exhibits the best thermal stability compared to all other formulated resins. This observation highlights the positive impact of the hardener on the thermal stability of the formulation, but an optimization of the formulations would be necessary for a better evaluation of the resins. In general, crude tannins (ADB, DSS, SPL) perform better than their associated resins, benefiting from better heat resistance. Among all the materials studied, ADB tannin stands out for its optimal thermal stability.

3.5. Resin Gel Time

Table 2 and Table 3 show the time required for the tannin resin to become rigid when combined with an Acacia nilotica hardener. It appears that, at a natural pH (6.4 and 6.7), the average curing time of Entandophragma candolei (KSPN) resin is 1887 seconds, that of Afzelia africana (DSSN) is 1880 seconds, that of Dacryodes klaineana (ADBN) is 1746 seconds, and that of Entandophragma cylindricum (SPLN) is 1811 seconds. It should be noted that this duration is considerably reduced when the pH is modified (11.2-11.8) through the incorporation of a 33% sodium hydroxide solution. Figure 9 shows the average curing time for each type of resin as a function of pH. The KSPN resin cures in 448 seconds, that of SPLN in 431s, while the DSSN resin requires 430 seconds and that of ADBN 427 seconds. We observed that the resin curing time decreased considerably when treated with sodium hydroxide. Indeed, sodium hydroxide serves to increase the hydroxyl functions in the tannin structure, i.e., its reactivity, and consequently improves the gel time [13]. Although synthetic resins have a shorter curing time than natural resins, the reactivity of the corrected resins formulated in this study remains interesting compared to others. This is the case for resins formulated with Mimosa tannin and hexamine (600s), and Mimosa tannin and lignin in proportions of 90/10, 80/20 (623s, 620s) [43]. Furthermore, it has been shown that formaldehyde resins had a very short gel time, approximately 50 seconds at 100 °C for pure Maritime pine tannin hardened with paraformaldehyde [31]. Compared to the longer gel time of the resin formulated in this study, we can therefore say that our resin does not contain a significant amount of aldehyde [31], thus being environmentally responsible.

3.6. Thermomechanical Analysis of the Resin

The thermograms expressing the Modulus of Elasticity (MOE) as a function of temperature of the different formulated resins are given in Figure 9. It is noted that the resin formulated with SPLN tannin has the highest modulus of elasticity (5267MPa) compared to other formulations. Next is the resin based on ADBN tannin with a modulus of elasticity of 3907MPa, then the one formulated with KSPN tannin with a value of 3315MPa, and finally the one with DSSN tannin which is 2363MPa. This result can be justified by several factors, notably the number of free reactive sites, polymer chain arrangement, the degree of polymerization, the type of interflavanoid linkages, the natural variability of tannins, and steric hindrance [33]. The resin formulated with (SPL) tannin has better crosslinking simply because in this tannin we have alpha-copaene, gamma-cadinene (terpenes), Tau-Cadinol, and eriodictyol molecules where there are easily accessible pi electrons, as well as several –OH functions, thus increasing the reactivity of this tannin towards the hardener. In the (ADB) tannin, several terpenes were identified, but these do not possess enough pi electrons, and those available are influenced by steric hindrance, which reduces its diffusion rate with the hardener. The N-methyl 4-hydroxypipecolic molecule found in the (KSP) tannin is responsible for the low reactivity of this resin. Indeed, the –CH3 group carried by the nitrogen atom makes its non-bonding pair unavailable. The low reactivity of the (DSS) tannin could be explained by the length of its molecular chains, reducing the mobility of reactive species. The results obtained from this analysis are better than those of resins formulated with hexamine and tannin from Sumac (2282MPa), Pomegranate (2100MPa), Mimosa (2665MPa), Quebracho (2464MPa), Aleppo Pine (2500MPa) (Saad et al., 2014). This highlights the high performance of the different resins formulated in this study.
Figure 10. Superimposition of TMA spectra of the different tannins formulated with the Acacia nilotica hardener.
Figure 10. Superimposition of TMA spectra of the different tannins formulated with the Acacia nilotica hardener.
Preprints 162933 g010

3.7. Comparative Study of Characterized Tannins with Those from Literature

Table 4 synthesizes the characteristics of tannins from tropical and commercial woods from recent studies, as well as those of the tannins that were the focus of this research. The observation made is that the tannins from this research possess good qualities, even surpassing those previously studied and already commercialized. Thus, the tannins from this research prove to be competitive.

4. Conclusions

This article presents the identification and characterization of new sources of tannins from tropical woods, intended for integration into the formulation of resins for the panel industry and inhibitors. 13C NMR and MALDI-TOF analysis allowed for the determination of the chemical properties of the tannins, while the characteristics of the resins were established through gel time and thermomechanical analysis. TGA was used to determine the thermal characteristics of the resins and tannins. The tannins extracted from the barks of Entandophragma candolei, Entandophragma cylindricum, Afzelia africana, and Dacryodes klaineana were all analyzed as condensed tannins whose chemical properties vary depending on each type of wood. The different formulated resins showed very long gel times, indicating the absence of aldehydes in them, highlighting their environmentally responsible nature. TGA showed that Dacryodes klaineana tannin has better thermal stability with a final residue of 45.05% at 600°C . However, the most thermally stable resin is the one formulated with Entandophragma candolei tannin and the Acacia nilotica hardener because it forms a well-developed polymer network with the Acacia nilotica hardener, with a final residue of 36.72%. In general, crude tannins (from Entandophragma cylindricum, Afzelia africana, and Dacryodes klaineana) perform better than their associated resins, benefiting from better heat resistance. Thermomechanical analysis shows good performance for all resins, with the resin formulated with Entandophragma cylindricum tannin and the Acacia nilotica hardener having the highest modulus of elasticity (5267MPa). The different tannins and resins characterized in this study are potential sources of adhesives for industry. However, for better utilization, the study will need to be optimized by using other hardeners.

Author Contributions

LN., B.N., A.B.B. and J.J.E.B., writing—review and editing, writing—original draft, methodology; J.Z.M. and M.A., methodology, data curation, supervision, formal analysis; LN., B.N., A.B.B. and J.J.E.B., writing—review and editing, validation, supervision; A.P., A.N.P. writing—review and editing, validation, supervision, conceptualization; A.P., A.P. and A.N.P., writing—review and editing, methodology, conceptualization; J.Z.M. and M.A., writing—review and editing, methodology, data curation; LN., B.N., A.B.B. and J.J.E.B, writing—review and editing, resources, project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding Statement

no funding of statement

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

This study received financial support from the Yunnan Provincial High-level.

Conflicts of Interest

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

References

  1. Romero, R.; Gonzalez, T.; Urbano, B.F.; Segura, C.; Pellis, A.; Vera, M. Exploring tannin structures to enhance enzymatic polymerization. Front. Chem. 2025, 13, 1555202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mneimneh, F.; Haddad, N.; Ramakrishna, S. Recycle and Reuse to Reduce Plastic Waste - A Perspective Study Comparing Petro- and Bioplastics. Circ. Econ. Sustain. 2024, 4, 1983–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Das, A.K.; Islam, N.; Faruk, O.; Ashaduzzaman; Dungani, R. Review on tannins: Extraction processes, applications and possibilities. South Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 135, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pizzi, A. Little Secrets for the Successful Industrial Use of Tannin Adhesives: A Review. J. Renew. Mater. 2023, 11, 3403–3415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cano, A.; Contreras, C.; Chiralt, A.; González-Martínez, C. Using tannins as active compounds to develop antioxidant and antimicrobial chitosan and cellulose based films. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2021, 2, 100156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vera, M.; Fodor, C.; Garcia, Y.; Pereira, E.; Loos, K.; Rivas, B.L. Multienzymatic immobilization of laccases on polymeric microspheres: A strategy to expand the maximum catalytic efficiency. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 49562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pizzi, A. Tannins: Prospectives and Actual Industrial Applications. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wedaïna, A.G.; Pizzi, A.; Nzie, W.; Danwe, R.; Segovia, C.; Kueny, R. Performance of Unidirectional Biocomposite Developed with Piptadeniastrum Africanum Tannin Resin and Urena Lobata Fibers as Reinforcement. J. Renew. Mater. 2021, 9, 477–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Valenzuela, J. , Leyser, E. von, Pizzi, A., Westermeyer, C., & Gorrini, B. (2012). Industrial production of pine tannin-bonded particleboard and Medium-Density Fiberboard (MDF).
  10. Konai, N.; Pizzi, A.; Raidandi, D.; Lagel, M.; L’hOstis, C.; Saidou, C.; Hamido, A.; Abdalla, S.; Bahabri, F.; Ganash, A. Aningre ( Aningeria spp.) tannin extract characterization and performance as an adhesive resin. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 77, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Konai, N.; Raidandi, D.; Pizzi, A.; Meva’a, L. Characterization of Ficus sycomorus tannin using ATR-FT MIR, MALDI-TOF MS and 13C NMR methods. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2017, 75, 807–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ntenga, R.; Pagore, F.D.; Pizzi, A.; Mfoumou, E.; Ohandja, L.-M.A. Characterization of tannin-based resins from the barks of Ficus platyphylla and of Vitellaria paradoxa: Composites’ performances and applications. Materials Sciences and Applications 2017, 8, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ndiwe, B.; Tibi, B.; Danwe, R.; Konai, N.; Pizzi, A.; Amirou, S. Reactivity, characterization and mechanical performance of particleboards bonded with tannin resins and bio hardeners from African trees. Int. Wood Prod. J. 2020, 11, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Konai, N.; Pizzi, A.; Raidandi, D.; Lagel, M.; L’hOstis, C.; Saidou, C.; Hamido, A.; Abdalla, S.; Bahabri, F.; Ganash, A. Aningre ( Aningeria spp.) tannin extract characterization and performance as an adhesive resin. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 77, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Konai, N.; Pizzi, A.; Danwe, R.; Lucien, M.; Lionel, K.T. Thermomechanical analysis of African tannins resins and biocomposite characterization. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2020, 35, 1492–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mewoli, A.E.; Segovia, C.; Njom, A.E.; Ebanda, F.B.; Biwôlé, J.J.E.; Xinyi, C.; Ateba, A.; Girods, P.; Pizzi, A.; Brosse, N. Characterization of tannin extracted from Aningeria altissima bark and formulation of bioresins for the manufacture of Triumfetta cordifolia needle-punched nonwovens fiberboards: Novel green composite panels for sustainability. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2023, 206, 117734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Njom, A.E.; Voufo, J.; Segovia, C.; Konai, N.; Mewoli, A.; Tapsia, L.K.; Meva'A, J.R.L.; Pizzi, A. Characterization of a composite based on Cissus dinklagei tannin resin. Heliyon 2024, 10, e25582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nga, L.; Ndiwe, B.; Biwolé, A.B.; Pizzi, A.; Biwole, J.J.E.; Mfomo, J.Z. Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time of Flight (MALDI-TOF)-Mass Spectrometry and 13C-NMR-Identified New Compounds in Paraberlinia bifoliolata (Ekop-Beli) Bark Tannins. J. Renew. Mater. 2024, 12, 553–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Borah, N.; Karak, N. Tannic acid based bio-based epoxy thermosets: Evaluation of thermal, mechanical, and biodegradable behaviors. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 139, 51792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. de Hoyos Martinez, P.L.; Merle, J.; Labidi, J.; Charrier-El Bouhtoury, F. Tannins extraction: A key point for their valorization and cleaner production. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 206, 1138–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Saad, H.; Khoukh, A.; Ayed, N.; Charrier, B.; Bouhtoury, F.C.-E. Characterization of Tunisian Aleppo pine tannins for a potential use in wood adhesive formulation. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 61, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mahdi, H.; Palmina, K.; Gurshi, A.; Covington, D. Potential of vegetable tanning materials and basic aluminum sulphate in Sudanese leather industry. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 2009, 4, 20–31. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tomak, E.D.; Gonultas, O. The Wood Preservative Potentials of Valonia, Chestnut, Tara and Sulphited Oak Tannins. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 2018, 38, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ghahri, S.; Pizzi, A. Improving soy-based adhesives for wood particleboard by tannins addition. Wood Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 261–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, T.; Dong, M.; Cui, J.; Gan, L.; Han, S. Exploring the formaldehyde reactivity of tannins with different molecular weight distributions: bayberry tannins and larch tannins. Holzforschung 2019, 74, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hafiz, N.L.M.; Tahir, P.M.; Hua, L.S.; Abidin, Z.Z.; Sabaruddin, F.A.; Yunus, N.M.; Abdullah, U.H.; Khalil, H.A. Curing and thermal properties of co-polymerized tannin phenol–formaldehyde resin for bonding wood veneers. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 6994–7001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nardeli, J.V.; Fugivara, C.S.; Taryba, M.; Pinto, E.R.; Montemor, M.; Benedetti, A.V. Tannin: A natural corrosion inhibitor for aluminum alloys. Prog. Org. Coatings 2019, 135, 368–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Byrne, C.; Selmi, G.; D’aLessandro, O.; Deyá, C. Study of the anticorrosive properties of “quebracho colorado” extract and its use in a primer for aluminum1050. Prog. Org. Coatings 2020, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bello, A.; Virtanen, V.; Salminen, J.-P.; Leiviskä, T. Aminomethylation of spruce tannins and their application as coagulants for water clarification. Separation and Purification Technology 2020, 242, 116765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, G.; Chen, Y.; Xu, G.; Pei, Y. Effective removing of methylene blue from aqueous solution by tannins immobilized on cellulose microfibers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 129, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ndiwe, B.; Pizzi, A.; Tibi, B.; Danwe, R.; Konai, N.; Amirou, S. Extraits d'exsudats d'écorce d'arbres africains en tant que bio-durcisseurs d'adhésifs tanniques thermodurcissables entièrement biosourcés pour panneaux de bois. Industrial crops and products 2019, 132, 253–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Navarrete, P.; Pizzi, A.; Pasch, H.; Rode, K.; Delmotte, L. MALDI-TOF and 13C NMR characterization of maritime pine industrial tannin extract. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2010, 32, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Saad, H.; Khoukh, A.; Ayed, N.; Charrier, B.; Charrier-El Bouhtoury, F. Caractérisation des tanins de pin d'Alep tunisien pour une utilisation potentielle dans la formulation d'adhésifs pour bois. Industrial Crops and Products 2014, 61, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Santoso, A.; Hadi, Y.S.; Pizzi, A.; Lagel, M.-C. Characterization of Merbau Wood Extract Used as an Adhesive in Glued Laminated Lumber. For. Prod. J. 2016, 66, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Meunier Quentin, Carl, M., & Jean-Louis, D. (2015). Les Arbres Utiles du Gabon.
  36. Scalbert, A.; Mila, I.; Expert, D.; Marmolle, F.; Albrecht, A.-M.; Hurrell, R.; Huneau, J.-F.; Tomé, D. Polyphenols, metal ion complexation and biological consequences. Plant Polyphenols 2: Chemistry, Biology, Pharmacology, Ecology, 1999, 545-554.
  37. Zhou, X.; Segovia, C.; Abdullah, U.H.; Pizzi, A.; Du, G. A novel fiber–veneer-laminated composite based on tannin resin. J. Adhes. 2015, 93, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bikoro Bi Athomo, A.; Engozogho Anris, S.P.; Safou Tchiama, R.; Leroyer, L.; Pizzi, A.; Charrier, B. Chemical analysis and thermal stability of African mahogany (Khaya ivorensis A. Chev) condensed tannins. Holzforschung 2020, 74, 683–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Athomo, A.B.B.; Anris, S.E.; Safou-Tchiama, R.; Santiago-Medina, F.; Cabaret, T.; Pizzi, A.; Charrier, B. Chemical composition of African mahogany (K. ivorensis A. Chev) extractive and tannin structures of the bark by MALDI-TOF. Industrial crops and products 2018, 113, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Amari, M.; Khimeche, K.; Hima, A.; Chebout, R.; Mezroua, A. Synthesis of Green Adhesive with Tannin Extracted from Eucalyptus Bark for Potential Use in Wood Composites. J. Renew. Mater. 2021, 9, 463–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Anris, S.P.E.; Athomo, A.B.B.; Safou-Tchiama, R.; Leroyer, L.; Vidal, M.; Charrier, B. Development of green adhesives for fiberboard manufacturing, using okoume bark tannins and hexamine – characterization by 1H NMR, TMA, TGA and DSC analysis. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2020, 35, 436–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pantoja-Castro, M.A.; González-Rodríguez, H. Study by infrared spectroscopy and TGA of tannins and tannic acid. Revista latinoamericana de química 2011, 39, 107–112. [Google Scholar]
  43. Amirou, S.; Zhang, J.; Essawy, H.; Pizzi, A.; Zerizer, A.; Li, J.; Delmotte, L. Utilization of hydrophilic/hydrophobic hyperbranched poly(amidoamine)s as additives for melamine urea formaldehyde adhesives. Polym. Compos. 2014, 36, 2255–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. 13C NMR spectra of the samples of the 4 analyzed tannins.
Figure 1. 13C NMR spectra of the samples of the 4 analyzed tannins.
Preprints 162933 g001aPreprints 162933 g001b
Figure 5. Curves TGA of ADBN and ADB (a:up ; b:bottom).
Figure 5. Curves TGA of ADBN and ADB (a:up ; b:bottom).
Preprints 162933 g005
Figure 6. Curves TGA of DSSN and DSS (a:up ; b:bottom).
Figure 6. Curves TGA of DSSN and DSS (a:up ; b:bottom).
Preprints 162933 g006
Figure 7. Curves TGA of KSP and KSPN (a:up ; b:bottom).
Figure 7. Curves TGA of KSP and KSPN (a:up ; b:bottom).
Preprints 162933 g007
Figure 8. Curves TGA of SPL and SPLN (a:up ; b:bottom).
Figure 8. Curves TGA of SPL and SPLN (a:up ; b:bottom).
Preprints 162933 g008
Figure 9. Influence of pH in resin formulation.
Figure 9. Influence of pH in resin formulation.
Preprints 162933 g009
Table 1. Thermogravimetric comparison of crude tannins and their resins formulated with Acacia nilotica.
Table 1. Thermogravimetric comparison of crude tannins and their resins formulated with Acacia nilotica.
Material Decomposition phases Final residue (%) Thermal stability Remarks Best performing material
ADB 3 45,05 High Good stability up to 600 °C, high carbon retention *****
DSS 4 43,18 High Progressive decomposition, better heat resistance
SPL 5 35,70 Good Good thermal resistance, partial combustion
KSP 3 30,80 Average Marked thermal decomposition, notable loss
ADBN 3 32,41 Average Successful crosslinking but average thermal stability
DSSN 4 31,77 Thermolabile bonds, significant thermal loss despite crosslinking
SPLN 3 21,84 Low More homogeneous network but low residue
KSPN 4 36,72 Good More elaborate polymer network, better crosslinking ****
Table 2. Measurement of resin gel time at natural pH.
Table 2. Measurement of resin gel time at natural pH.
Trials 1 2 3 pH
Species Time in second(s)
Entandophragma candolei 1787 2188 1686 6,5
Afzelia africana 1810 1985 1755 6,7
Dacryodes klaineana 1692 1746 1802 6,4
Entandophragma cylindrycum 1929 1756 1750 6,6
Table 3. Measurement of resin gel time after addition of 33% concentrated sodium hydroxide.
Table 3. Measurement of resin gel time after addition of 33% concentrated sodium hydroxide.
Trials 1 2 3 pH
Wood species Time in second(s)
Entandophragma candolei 440 435 468 11,2
Afzelia africana 430 425 435 11,6
Dacryodes klaineana 432 426 422 11,3
Entandophragma cylindrycum 429 436 430 11,8
Table 4. Comparative study of characterized tannins with those from literature.
Table 4. Comparative study of characterized tannins with those from literature.
Species Part of the tree used Nature of tannin Extraction yield (%) Extraction method Maximum temperature (Tmax, °C) Thermomechanical analysis of the resin (MPa) Gel time Applications References
Tannins from tropical woods
Paraberlinia bifoliolata Bark Condensed 35% Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution - 4840 - Adhesives for panels and corrosion inhibitors (Nga et al., 2024)
Daniellia oliveri Bark Condensed (flavonoids, catechins) 29% Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution - 2370#break# 790 s Adhesives for Fiberboard (Konai et al., 2021)
Aningre (Aningeria spp) Bark Condensed 19% Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution - 1191 - Resins for particleboard (Konai et al., 2015)
Piptadeniastrum africanum Bark Condensed - Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution - 3909 660 s Adhesives for Fiberboard (Wedaïna et al., 2021)
Ficus sycomorus Barks Condensed 46%, Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution - 7050 600 s Adhesives for Fiberboard (Konai et al., 2021)
Butyrospermum parkii Barks Condensed 40%#break# Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution - 46210 701 s Adhesives for Fiberboard (Konai et al., 2021)
Azadirachta indica Barks Condensed 35%. Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution - 2650 762 s Adhesives for Fiberboard (Konai et al., 2021)
Ficus platyphylla Barks Condensed - Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution 2091 - Adhesives for particleboard (Ntenga et al., 2017)
Vitellaria paradoxa Barks Condensed - Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution 1989 - Adhesives for particleboard (Ntenga et al., 2017)
Cissus dinklagei Barks Condensed Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution 300 °C 3825 - Adhesives for particleboard (Njom et al., 2024)
Aningeria altissima Barks Condensed 25.52% Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution 325 °C 5491.77 840 -1201 s Adhesives for Fiberboard (Mewoli et al., 2023)
Gilbertiodendron dewevrei Barks Condensed - Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution - 1684.95, 6209.24, 2221.33, 7762.31, 3671.42,#break#1930.3 523 s, 584 s, 669 s, 744 s, 752 s, 783 s Adhesives for Fiberboard (Ndiwe et al., 2020)
Commercial tannins
Pinus maritimus Bark Polylavonoide tannin - Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution - 2770#break#3050#break#3250#break#3500 39s -585s Adhesives for particleboard (Navarrete et al., 2013), (Navarrete et al., 2010)
Schinopsis balansae Commercialized Polylavonoide tannin Industrial - - 238s Adhesives for particleboard (Jorda et al., 2022)
Studied tannins
Entandophragma candolei Bark Condensed 40 % Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution 340 °C 3315 448s
Entandophragma cylindricum Bark Condensed 35 % Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution 280 and 310 °C 5267 431s
Afzelia africana Bark Condensed 33 % Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution 0 and 250°C. 2363 430s
Dacryodes klaineana Bark Condensed 25 % Hot Extraction in Aqueous Solution 525 °C 3907 427s
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated