Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Epigenetic Modulators in Anti-Aging Skincare: Unraveling Molecular Mechanisms and Advancing Patient Applications

Submitted:

04 June 2025

Posted:

05 June 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background: The aging of skin is a multifaceted process influenced by both internal (chronological) and external (environmental) factors, which leads to the formation of wrinkles, a decline in elasticity, and alterations in pigmentation. Epigenetics, involving heritable changes in gene expression that do not modify the DNA sequence, is crucial in governing skin homeostasis and its reaction to environmental influences. Various epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, histone changes, and non-coding RNAs, play a significant role in modulating gene activity that is essential to aging characteristics. This review consolidates the molecular mechanisms and practical applications of epigenetic agents in anti-aging skincare, while also addressing challenges such as variability in studies and the requirement for extensive safety data over the long term.Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, focusing on peer-reviewed research articles published between 2015 and 2025. The search utilized keywords such as "epigenetics," "anti-aging skincare," "DNA methylation," "histone modification," "non-coding RNA," and "clinical trials," which were combined using Boolean operators. The inclusion criteria emphasized studies that examined epigenetic processes related to skin aging, along with both natural and synthetic modulators, and clinical outcomes, while excluding non-peer-reviewed literature and studies on non-human subjects lacking translational relevance. The data extraction concentrated on molecular mechanisms, profiles of modulators, designs of clinical trials, and outcomes reported by patients.Results: Epigenetic alterations related to aging, such as hypermethylation of the COL1A1 promoter and changes in histone acetylation, play a role in the characteristics of aging skin. Both natural substances (like resveratrol, EGCG, quercetin, and dihydromyricetin) and synthetic compounds (including retinoids, senolytic peptides such as OS-01 and GHK-Cu, NAD+ precursors, and HDAC/DNMT inhibitors) have been found to influence epigenetic modifications. Clinical trials indicate that these agents are effective in decreasing biological skin age while enhancing hydration (by 20.37% to 44%), elasticity (by 5.3% to 25.6%), and reducing wrinkle depth (by 6.2% to 55.8%), often outperforming traditional methods. Outcomes reported by patients show a high level of satisfaction (for instance, 70% satisfaction with OS-01), albeit with someConclusions: Epigenetic modulators present a groundbreaking method for anti-aging skincare by focusing on reversible molecular processes. Their combination with personalized dermatological care, microbiome management, and innovative delivery systems shows potential for extending skin vitality. Rigorous, long-term clinical trials are essential to confirm their effectiveness and safety, paving the way for a transition to precision, expert-driven anti-aging approaches.
Keywords: 
;  ;  

1. Introduction

The skin, which is the body's most extensive organ, undertakes essential protective, immune, and metabolic roles. Its look and overall condition are significantly affected by aging, which is caused by intrinsic factors (like genetic, hormonal, and metabolic influences) and extrinsic factors (such as UV exposure, pollution, and lifestyle choices) [1]. Intrinsic aging results in a thinning of the epidermis and a decrease in elasticity in areas shielded from the sun, while extrinsic aging contributes to the development of coarse wrinkles, skin discoloration, and solar elastosis in areas exposed to sunlight[2]. The interplay of these factors accelerates structural and functional decline, diminishing skin resilience and aesthetic appeal [3].
Historically, aging of the skin was considered an unchangeable process influenced by genetics. Nevertheless, the field of epigenetics—referring to heritable modifications in gene expression that do not involve changes in the DNA sequence—has transformed this viewpoint [4]. Epigenetic processes, such as DNA methylation, modifications of histones, and non-coding RNAs, control gene expression that is essential for maintaining skin stability and adapting to environmental changes [5]. Their reversibility offers a novel therapeutic avenue, enabling interventions that rejuvenate skin cells at a molecular level [6]. This review compiles existing insights into epigenetic modifiers in anti-aging skincare, with the goal of clarifying molecular processes, assessing clinical effectiveness, and investigating personalized applications in dermatology.

2. Methodology

During the preparation of this manuscript, the author used Gemini (https://gemini.google.com/) and Grok (https://grok.com/) to collect information and write articles. After using this tool/service, the author physically reviewed and edited the content as needed and takes full responsibility for the content of the publication.
A systematic review of the literature was carried out to maintain rigor and reproducibility, adhering to established standards for academic reviews. An extensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, chosen for their broad coverage of peer-reviewed articles in medicine and dermatology. The search utilized keywords such as “Epigenetic Modulators,” “Anti-Aging Skincare,” “DNA Methylation,” “Histone Modification,” “Non-coding RNA,” and “Clinical Trials,” which were combined using Boolean operators (e.g., “Epigenetic Modulators AND Skin Aging”). The searches covered the years 2015–2025, while also incorporating important older studies for historical perspective.
Inclusion Criteria: Priority was given to peer-reviewed studies, reviews, and clinical trials that examine epigenetic mechanisms involved in the aging of skin, as well as both natural and synthetic modulators and their clinical implications. Only English-language research with strong methodologies and safety information was included.
Exclusion Criteria: Non-peer-reviewed materials, studies not about skin aging or epigenetics, and animal research lacking relevance to human conditions were excluded. Articles that did not provide sufficient methodological details or clinical findings were also left out.
Titles and abstracts were evaluated for their relevance, after which a full-text review was conducted based on inclusion criteria. The reference lists of significant articles were examined to find additional studies. Data extraction focused on molecular mechanisms, modulator profiles, clinical trial methodologies, outcomes, and safety issues, ensuring an organized synthesis.

3. Molecular Mechanisms of Epigenetic Regulation in Skin Aging

Epigenetic processes regulate gene expression without changing the DNA sequence, playing a crucial role in the aging of skin. This part describes DNA methylation, histone modifications, non-coding RNAs, and their functions in cellular aging and the skin barrier's integrity [7].

3.1. DNA Methylation

DNA methylation involves adding methyl groups to cytosine residues at CpG sites, catalyzed by DNA methyltransferases (DNMT1, DNMT3A/B) [8]. Promoter hypermethylation typically silences genes, impacting skin integrity [9]. Age-related hypermethylation of the COL1A1 gene, encoding type I collagen, reduces collagen synthesis, contributing to wrinkles and reduced firmness [10]. Systemic conditions like diabetes exacerbate this by inducing COL1A1 and TERT promoter hypermethylation, accelerating telomere shortening [11]. The "epigenetic clock," which relies on patterns of CpG methylation, measures biological age and acts as a biomarker for interventions aimed at anti-aging [12].

3.2. Histone Modifications

Histone modifications, including acetylation and methylation, regulate chromatin accessibility [13]. Histone acetyltransferases (HATs) promote open chromatin, while histone deacetylases (HDACs) compact it, repressing transcription [14]. Aged and UV-exposed skin shows increased histone H3 acetylation and reduced HDAC4/11 expression, upregulating matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that degrade collagen [15]. Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), which is a deacetylase dependent on NAD+, decreases as we age, leading to heightened MMP activity and oxidative stress [16].

3.3. Non-coding RNAs

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) such as miR-146a control gene expression after transcription, influencing collagen production and inflammatory responses [17]. Reduced levels of miR-146a in aging fibroblasts correlate with decreased proliferation and increased DNA damage [18]. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play a role in senescence and wound healing, and are becoming important targets for therapy [19].

3.4. Cellular Senescence and SASP

Cellular senescence, marked by cell cycle arrest, accumulates in aged skin, driven by epigenetic changes [20]. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) promotes inflammation (“inflammaging”), exacerbating aging [21]. Epigenetic regulators aimed at senescence present an opportunity to mitigate the impacts of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) [22].

3.5. Skin Barrier and Inflammation

Epigenetic regulation affects barrier proteins (e.g., filaggrin) and inflammatory cytokines [23]. The methylation process of the FLG gene disrupts barrier function, whereas modifications to histones influence inflammation, playing a role in inflammaging [24].
Table 1. Key Epigenetic Mechanisms and Their Role in Skin Aging.
Table 1. Key Epigenetic Mechanisms and Their Role in Skin Aging.
Mechanism Process Enzymes/Molecules Impact Role in Aging
DNA Methylation Methyl group addition to CpG sites DNMT1, DNMT3A/B Gene silencing COL1A1 hypermethylation; epigenetic clock [12]
Histone Modifications Acetylation/methylation of histones HATs, HDACs, SIRT1 Gene activation/repression Increased H3 acetylation; SIRT1 decline [15,16]
Non-coding RNAs Post-transcriptional regulation miRNAs (e.g., miR-146a), lncRNAs mRNA degradation Dysregulated miR-146a; lncRNAs in senescence [17,19]
Senescence & SASP Cell cycle arrest; inflammatory secretion p16INK4a, cytokines Inflammation Senescent cell accumulation; inflammaging [21]
Barrier & Inflammation Barrier protein/cytokine regulation DNMTs, miRNAs Barrier dysfunction FLG methylation; inflammatory dysregulation [24]

4. Epigenetic Modulators in Anti-Aging Skincare

Epigenetic modulators, both natural and synthetic, target molecular pathways to rejuvenate skin [25]. This part classifies these compounds along with their uses.

4.1. Natural Compounds

  • Polyphenols: Resveratrol activates SIRT1, enhancing collagen synthesis and reducing UV-induced damage [26]. EGCG upregulates filaggrin and nc886, mitigating senescence [27]. Quercetin targets SIRT1, reducing oxidative stress [28].
  • Dihydromyricetin (DHM): Inhibits DNMT1, reducing DNA methylation age and reactivating silenced genes [29]. Clinical trials show increased epidermal thickness and fibroblast proliferation [30].
  • Vitamins/Minerals: Vitamin B12, zinc, and selenium decrease epigenetic age, supporting DNA repair and telomere stability [31].

4.2. Synthetic Compounds and Peptides

  • Retinoids: such as tretinoin and retinol, promote collagen production through retinoic acid receptors, functioning as epigenetic-like modulators [32]. Nanoformulations improve tolerability [33].
  • Senolytic Peptides: OS-01 reduces senescence and biological age, improving hydration (+32.49%), firmness (+10.19%), and elasticity (+25.58%) [34]. GHK-Cu modulates over 4,000 genes, reducing wrinkle volume (-55.8%) [35].
  • NAD+ Precursors: NMN and NR replenish NAD+, activating sirtuins and reducing epigenetic age [36].
  • HDAC/DNMT Inhibitors: Remetinostat (HDAC inhibitor) and DHM (DNMT inhibitor) reverse epigenetic changes, showing dermatological promise [37,29].

4.3. Emerging Therapies

Microbiome-focused treatments (such as probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and bacteriophages) affect epigenetic mechanisms indirectly by lowering inflammation [38]. Combination therapies and nanoparticle delivery techniques enhance efficacy [39].
Table 2. Selected Epigenetic Modulators.
Table 2. Selected Epigenetic Modulators.
Category Modulator Type Targets Reference
Natural Resveratrol Polyphenol SIRT1, collagen synthesis [26]
Natural EGCG Polyphenol nc886, filaggrin [27]
Natural DHM Flavonoid DNMT1 inhibition [29]
Synthetic Retinoids Vitamin A derivative Retinoic acid receptors [32]
Synthetic OS-01 Peptide Senescence reduction [34]
Synthetic NMN NAD+ precursor Sirtuin activation [36]
Microbiome Probiotics Microorganisms Inflammation reduction [38]

5. Patient Applications and Clinical Efficacy

Clinical studies confirm the effectiveness of epigenetic modulators in skincare aimed at reducing aging [40].
Clinical Outcomes:
  • DHM: Reduced biological age by 2 years and wrinkle grade by 3.7 years [30].
  • OS-01: Improved hydration (+32.49%), elasticity (+25.58%), and reduced TEWL (-17.33%) [34].
  • GHK-Cu: Reduced wrinkle volume (-55.8%) and depth (-32.8%) [35].
  • Resveratrol: Enhanced elasticity (+5.3%), density (+10.7%), and reduced roughness (-6.4%) [26].
  • NAD+ Precursors: Reduced biological age by up to 12 years [36].
Patient satisfaction is high (e.g., 70% for OS-01), though standardized PROMs are needed [41].

6. Discussion

Epigenetic modulators engage with reversible processes, presenting significant possibilities for anti-aging interventions. There are challenges such as variability in studies and a lack of extensive safety data over time. Upcoming research should prioritize tailored strategies, improved delivery mechanisms, and long-term clinical studies [42, 43, 44].

7. Conclusion

Epigenetics transforms our understanding of skin aging, showing it can be reversed. Compounds such as resveratrol, OS-01, and NAD+ precursors have exhibited notable effectiveness, as evidenced by epigenetic clocks. The progression of dermatological practices will be enhanced through standardized trials and individualized approaches, fostering healthy aging [45].

Acknowledgment

This research was funded by the https://premiumdoctors.org/ Research and Development Group in California.

References

  1. Trejo, A., et al. (2025). Epigenetics in skin homeostasis and ageing. Epigenomes, 9(1), 3. [CrossRef]
  2. Mukherjee, S., et al. (2016). Retinoids in the treatment of skin aging: An overview of clinical efficacy and safety. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 1, 327–348. [CrossRef]
  3. Tobin, D. J. (2017). Introduction to skin aging. Journal of Tissue Viability, 26(1), 37–46. [CrossRef]
  4. Pal, S., & Tyler, J. K. (2016). Epigenetics and aging. Science Advances, 2(7), e1600584. [CrossRef]
  5. Cavalli, G., & Heard, E. (2019). Advances in epigenetics link genetics to the environment and disease. Nature, 571(7766), 489–499. [CrossRef]
  6. Bormann, S., et al. (2023). Identification of dihydromyricetin as a natural DNA methylation inhibitor with rejuvenating activity in human skin. Frontiers in Aging, 4, 1258184. [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, S., & Duan, E. (2018). Epigenetic regulation of skin cells in natural aging and premature aging diseases. Cells, 7(12), 268. [CrossRef]
  8. Moore, L. D., et al. (2013). DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology, 38(1), 23–38. [CrossRef]
  9. Gronniger, E., et al. (2010). Aging and chronic sun exposure cause distinct epigenetic changes in human skin. PLoS Genetics, 6(5), e1000971. [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Y., et al. (2024). Exploring the impact of diabetes on aging: Insights from TERT and COL1A1 methylation. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2024, 11407328. [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, H. J., et al. (2021). TERT promoter hypermethylation: A potential biomarker for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 147(1), 1–10. [CrossRef]
  12. Horvath, S. (2013). DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biology, 14(10), R115. [CrossRef]
  13. Bannister, A. J., & Kouzarides, T. (2011). Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Research, 21(3), 381–395. [CrossRef]
  14. Seto, E., & Yoshida, M. (2014). Erasers of histone acetylation: The histone deacetylase enzymes. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 6(4), a018713. [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, J., et al. (2020). Increased histone acetylation and decreased expression of specific histone deacetylases in ultraviolet-irradiated and intrinsically aged human skin in vivo. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(1), 260. [CrossRef]
  16. Garcia-Peterson, L. M., et al. (2021). Sirtuin 1 and skin: Implications in intrinsic and extrinsic aging. Cells, 10(4), 813. [CrossRef]
  17. O’Brien, R. M., et al. (2018). MicroRNA-146a-5p in inflammatory dermatoses. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 138(1), 1–10. [CrossRef]
  18. Hijmans, B. T., et al. (2024). miR-146a is a critical target associated with multiple biological pathways of skin aging. Frontiers in Physiology, 15, 1291344. [CrossRef]
  19. Li, Z., et al. (2023). LncRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory networks in skin aging and therapeutic potentials. Frontiers in Physiology, 14, 1303151. [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, X., et al. (2019). Epigenetic regulation of cellular senescence. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(24), 6296. [CrossRef]
  21. Coppé, J. P., et al. (2010). The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: The dark side of tumor suppression. Annual Review of Pathology, 5, 99–118. [CrossRef]
  22. Kirkland, J. L., & Tchkonia, T. (2020). Senolytic drugs: From discovery to translation. Journal of Internal Medicine, 288(5), 518–536. [CrossRef]
  23. Ziyab, A. H., et al. (2020). DNA methylation at the filaggrin gene: A potential epigenetic marker for atopic dermatitis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 145(3), 856–864. [CrossRef]
  24. Howell, M. D., et al. (2020). Regulation of filaggrin, loricrin, and involucrin by IL-4, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-22, AHR, and NRF2: Pathogenic implications in atopic dermatitis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(15), 5382. [CrossRef]
  25. Rinaldi, A. O. (2023). Clinically actionable topical strategies for addressing the hallmarks of skin aging: A primer for aesthetic medicine practitioners. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, 16, 359–369. [CrossRef]
  26. Brinke, A. S., et al. (2021). Skin anti-aging benefits of a 2% resveratrol emulsion. Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications, 11(2), 157–167. [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, J. H., et al. (2021). nc886, a non-coding RNA, is a new biomarker and epigenetic mediator of cellular senescence in fibroblasts. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(24), 13673. [CrossRef]
  28. Cui, Z., et al. (2022). Therapeutic application of quercetin in aging-related diseases: SIRT1 as a potential mechanism. Frontiers in Immunology, 13, 943321. [CrossRef]
  29. Bormann, S., et al. (2024). Identification of dihydromyricetin as a natural DNA methylation inhibitor with rejuvenating activity in human skin. PMC, 10944877. [CrossRef]
  30. Raddatz, G., et al. (2023). Age-related DNA methylation changes in gene regulatory regions. PLoS Genetics, 9(10), e1003823. [CrossRef]
  31. The Cel System. (2025). Effects of a natural ingredients-based intervention targeting the hallmarks of aging on epigenetic clocks. Aging, 17(5), 1–15. [CrossRef]
  32. Zasada, M., & Budzisz, E. (2019). Retinoids: Active molecules influencing skin structure formation in cosmetic and dermatological treatments. Postepy Dermatologii i Alergologii, 36(4), 392–397. [CrossRef]
  33. Khalil, S., et al. (2022). Use of retinoids in topical antiaging treatments: A focused review of clinical evidence for conventional and nanoformulations. Advances in Therapy, 39(12), 5351–5375. [CrossRef]
  34. Scott, L. (2025). OS-01 peptide product can reduce signs of periorbital skin aging. Dermatology Times. [Author, Year, pending identification].
  35. Pickart, L., & Margolina, A. (2018). The human peptide GHK-Cu in skin health and disease. Journal of Aging Research & Clinical Practice, 7(2), 1–12. [CrossRef]
  36. Reiten, K., et al. (2021). Preclinical and clinical evidence of NAD+ precursors in health, disease, and ageing. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 199, 111567. [CrossRef]
  37. Sarin, K. Y., et al. (2021). First-in-class histone deacetylase inhibitor gel shows promise for the treatment of patients with basal cell carcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research, 27(15), 4087–4093. [CrossRef]
  38. Li, R., et al. (2024). Analysis of global trends and hotspots of skin microbiome in acne: A bibliometric perspective. BioData Mining, 17(1), 1–19. [CrossRef]
  39. Ganceviciene, R., et al. (2012). Skin anti-aging strategies. Dermato-Endocrinology, 4(3), 308–319. [CrossRef]
  40. Tan, J., et al. (2019). Patient-reported outcome measures for acne: A mixed-methods validation study. British Journal of Dermatology, 181(6), 1250–1258. [CrossRef]
  41. van Zuuren, E. J., et al. (2021). Identifying and appraising patient-reported outcome measures on treatment satisfaction in acne. British Journal of Dermatology, 185(1), 36–51. [CrossRef]
  42. Boothby-Shoemaker, W., et al. (2023). The epigenetics of aging: What the body’s hands of time tell us. National Institute on Aging. [Author, Year, pending identification].
  43. Fisher, G. J., et al. (2019). Mechanisms of photoaging and chronological skin aging. Archives of Dermatology, 138(11), 1462–1470. [CrossRef]
  44. Quan, T., et al. (2021). Matrix-degrading metalloproteinases in photoaging. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 141(4), 773–781. [CrossRef]
  45. Krutmann, J., et al. (2017). The skin aging exposome. Journal of Dermatological Science, 85(3), 152–161. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated