Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Geometry and Constants in Finite Relativistic Algebra

Submitted:

01 June 2025

Posted:

03 June 2025

Read the latest preprint version here

Abstract
We show that a single finite field, built from any odd prime \(p\), already contains everything needed to mimic smooth geometry and Fourier analysis. By arranging the field’s basic arithmetic moves in a 4-dimensional symmetry cube, we obtain a finite lattice that has the same combinatorial shape as a 2-sphere. Completing the field with infinitesimals turns this lattice into a genuinely smooth surface with constant curvature. The field itself also provides finite versions of the familiar constants \(i, \pi\) and \(e\), identified by their structural roles. Using these constants we build a Fourier kernel that works simultaneously in the finite and continuous settings, merging the usual and the discrete Fourier transforms into one framework. In short, smooth geometry, fundamental mathematical constants, and harmonic analysis can all arise from finite arithmetic alone.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

In [1] we proposed the relativistic algebra over a finite field F p equipped with its gauge-covariant symmetry triple—translation, dilation and powering—as an arithmetic object able to represent every affine change-of-coordinates map k a k + b ( mod q ) (see also [2,3]). By arranging these three operators orthogonally to a cardinality axis, we showed that F p forms a 2-spheroid (the discrete analog of S 2 )—sitting diagonally in a 4-dimensional coordinate cube of symmetries—that already encodes the combinatorial signature of the topological sphere [4].
The present work advances that programme from purely discrete to pseudo-smooth geometry. Leveraging a non-principal ultrafilter [5], we pass from the finite field F p to the ultrapower R p , a characteristic-p continuum whose diagonal copy of F p forms an infinitesimal lattice, where we let p to be an odd prime p 1 ( mod 4 ) , and R p : = n F p / U for its ultrapower. Within R p 4 we lift the discrete spheroid to the internal surface
S p = { ( σ ( u , v ) , c ) : u , v , c [ 0 , 1 ] p } ,
where σ is the rational stereographic chart [6] and [ 0 , 1 ] p the pseudo-unit interval. Transfer principles [7] guarantee that S p is an internal C two-manifold1 , while its hyperfinite trace reproduces the original ( p 1 ) 2 2 + 1 -point lattice exactly. Three consequences follow.
(i)
Every affine gauge of F p extends to an internal diffeomorphism of S p , so the pseudo-smooth surface inherits the full relativistic covariance of the finite algebra.
(ii)
Loeb-measure shadows [8] show that the combinatorial curvature of the lattice converges, up to infinitesimals, to the Gauss curvature of S p [9]. This tangible bridge between discrete and smooth geometry in characteristic p also paves the way for harmonic analysis [10,11], heat flow [12], and gauge theory [13] on finite relativistic geometries.
(iii)
The framed field F p contains three fundamental structural constants i p , π p , e p —canonically singled out by its cyclic order. These constants serve as finite-field analogs of the classical i , π , e that underpin calculus on R and C .
By exhibiting a genuine differential structure generated solely from the finite ring data, we provide concrete evidence that the proposed relativistic algebra can support the full extent of modern geometric ideas. This pseudo-smooth realization is therefore an essential incremental step toward our long-term goal: a unified algebraic foundation capable of expressing and interrelating the languages of mathematics, encompassing both the number theory, and the complete reconstruction of the classical analytic toolkit within a single, finite and gauge-covariant framework.

2. Finite Fields and Arithmetic Symmetries

Let Z q : = Z / q Z = { 0 , 1 , 2 , , q 1 } be a finite ring of integers modulo a natural number q. The elements of Z q form a complete and closed set of relational representations of Z q under modular addition and multiplication. However, the specific numeric labels assigned to these elements—particularly the designation of 0 and 1 as the additive and multiplicative identities—are intrinsically relative and carry no absolute meaning within the ring itself [1].
A typical diagram of a finite ring Z q , where q = 13 , is shown in Figure 1. We would like to specifically note that such a diagram is typically visualized as a circle on a 2D plane that illustrates its periodicity and rotational symmetry under the arithmetic operation of addition, thus assigning an intuitive geometric interpretation to the arithmetic structure of the additive group ( Z q , + ) . However, the association between arithmetic operations and symbolic geometry can be extended further. In the finite ring Z q , the basic arithmetic operations of counting, addition, multiplication, and exponentiation can be all understood as manifestations of the underlying symmetries of structural transformations of the field [14].
Counting corresponds to the selection of the cardinality q of the underlying set. While typically taken for granted, the act of counting is an ontologically and informationally significant degree of freedom that both presupposes the existence of the ring Z q , and determines the entirety of its structural properties. Furthermore, the counting operation establishes a translation symmetry successor map n n + 1 ( mod q ) that underpins the operation of addition as its iterative application.
Addition corresponds to the iterative application of counting. The additive group ( Z q , + ) forms a finite cyclic group of order q, generated by the element 1. Each addition operation a a + k (mod q) can be viewed as a rotation by k steps around a circular configuration of the elements of Z q . This symmetry reflects the homogeneity and periodicity of the additive structure [14].
Multiplication corresponds to the iterative application of addition, and furthermore reflects a scaling symmetry within the ring. The operation a a · k (mod q) corresponds to a dilation or contraction of the additive structure, where the effect of multiplication is constrained by the modulus. The multiplicative structure of Z q is more subtle: if q is prime, Z q × = Z q { 0 } forms a finite multiplicative group, and multiplication becomes a permutation of the nonzero elements. If q is composite, the presence of zero divisors disrupts this structure, but the operation still defines a transformation governed by modular symmetry [15].
Exponentiation, or the operation a a n (mod q), represents iterative applications of multiplication. When restricted to the multiplicative group Z q × , this operation defines power maps and automorphisms that reveal the group-theoretic structure and internal symmetries of the ring. In particular, when q is prime, exponentiation captures cyclic subgroup structures and encodes deep number-theoretic properties such as primitive roots and residue classes [16].
Thus, the basic arithmetic operations in Z q are not arbitrary—they are algebraic expressions of the ring’s internal symmetries. They define how elements of the system transform under structured, invertible actions, and they reveal the harmonious regularity inherent in finite arithmetic.
Proposition 1
(3-Manifold Geometry of Z q ). For a fixed value of cardinality q, the finite ring Z q , together with its triplet of arithmetic symmetries, may be interpreted as a discrete symbolic three-dimensional manifold embedded in an abstract four-dimensional symmetry space.
The detailed proof and the precise description of the resultant mathematical structure for non-prime values of q involve additional complexities, such as zero divisors and loss of multiplicative inverses, which are beyond the immediate scope of this publication and will be addressed in detail in our future work. Here, we would like to restrict ourselves to the important case of odd prime q, where the structure simplifies significantly, allowing for a clearer analysis and demonstration of the resultant symbolic geometry.
More specifically, when q is a prime, the ring Z q becomes a field, and the exponentiation symmetry becomes algebraically reducible to multiplication due to the cyclic nature of Z q × . As a result, the independent exponential symmetry collapses, and the effective symmetry structure reduces from three to two dimensions. In this sense, the symbolic 3-manifold degenerates to a 2-spheroid within the same 4D space, reflecting a reduction in the degrees of algebraic freedom. In order to emphasize that q is an odd prime, we will henceforth denote it as p and the corresponding finite framed field as F p .

2.1. The Discrete 2-Spheroid Inside Symmetry Space

Throughout this subsection p denotes an odd prime and F p its finite field. Write F p × = F p { 0 } for the multiplicative group, and fix a primitive root g F p × .
Definition 1
(Arithmetic symmetries). For k , n F p define endomorphisms of F p
T k ( a ) = a + k , S k ( a ) = k a , P n ( a ) = a n , a F p .
The translation maps T k form the additive group ( F p , + ) ; the scaling maps S k form F p × ; and P n is called exponentiation.
Lemma 2.1
(Exponentiation collapses to scaling). For every n F p there exists a unique m { 0 , , p 2 } such that P n = S g m on F p .
Proof. 
Because F p × is cyclic of order p 1 there is m with g m g n ( mod p ) ; hence a n = g m log g a = g m a for all a F p × , and trivially for a = 0 . □
The symmetry triple ( T k , S k , P n ) therefore contains only two algebraically independent directions, namely translation and scaling.
Definition 2
(Carrier cube and diagonal embedding). Set
S p : = ( F p ) 4 = { ( c , a , m , e ) c , a , m , e F p } ,
the carrier cube whose coordinates record
count (c) , add (a) , multiply (m) , exponentiate (e) .
Embed the field diagonally by ι : F p S p , a ( a , a , a , a ) .
Definition 3
(Orbit complex). Let
N p : = T k 1 S k 2 ι ( a ) | a , k 1 , k 2 F p S p .
Equip S p with the cubical adjacency relation: two vertices are adjacent when they differ in exactly one coordinate by 1 modulo p. The sub-complex N p inherits this incidence structure.
Proposition 2
(Finite 2-spheroid). The orbit complex N p is a regular CW-complex [17] whose links of vertices are combinatorial circles; consequently N p is combinatorially isomorphic to the boundary of a 3-simplex, i.e. to the 2-sphere S 2 . Thus, F p , together with translation and scaling, realizes a finite discrete 2-spheroid embedded in the 4-dimensional lattice S p as depicted in Figure 2.
Proof. 
  • Two-parameter generation. By the lemma any composition of T k , S k , P n reduces to T k S k ; hence N p is exactly the orbit of ι ( 0 ) under the commuting group F p × F p × .
  • Dimension. Each orbit point is obtained by at most two independent moves (T and S), so every cell in the induced cubical structure has dimension 2 . Non-degeneracy of the actions ensures that two-dimensional faces do appear, making the complex pure of dimension 2.
  • Local sphericality. At a vertex v adjacent vertices differ from v in exactly one of the two active coordinates. The four resulting neighbours form a 4-cycle, i.e. the link of v is a combinatorial 1-sphere.
  • Global structure. A finite, pure 2-dimensional CW-complex with cyclic vertex links is necessarily a triangulation of a topological 2-sphere (Alexander duality or direct enumeration). Hence N p S 2 .
Remark 2.2.
No additional topology is required—the compactness of N p follows from finiteness. The term “spheroid” refers to the regular 2-sphere CW-structure obtained above, serving as the symbolic analogue of a smooth sphere.

2.2. Pseudo-Smooth Lift

Let p be a fixed odd prime. All constructions below are carried out inside one and the same finite field F p .
Definition 4
(Pseudo-reals [1]). Fix a non-principal ultrafilter U on N and set
R p : = n N F p / U , ι : F p R p , a [ ( a , a , a , ) ] U .
R p is an internal field of characteristic p that is κ -saturated for every standard κ < card ( R ) . The diagonal copy ι ( F p ) is a hyperfinite lattice which is ε -dense in every compact interval of R p for any infinitesimal ε .
We write [ 0 , 1 ] p : = { x R p : 0 x 1 } for the pseudo-unit interval, a totally ordered, internally compact subset of R p .
Definition 5
(Internal stereographic map). Define
σ : R p 2 { u 2 + v 2 = 1 } R p 3 , σ ( u , v ) : = 2 u D , 2 v D , u 2 + v 2 1 D , D : = u 2 + v 2 + 1 .
Transfer of the classical estimate shows that σ is internally 1-Lipschitz on [ 0 , 1 ] p 2 .
Definition 6
(Pseudo-smooth surface and lattice). Set
S p : = ( σ ( u , v ) , c ) | u , v , c [ 0 , 1 ] p ( R p ) 4 , L p : = S p ι ( F p ) 4 .
The set L p is finite with p 3 points and inherits from the cubical lattice ι ( F p ) 4 a regular CW–complex isomorphic to the discrete 2-spheroid of Proposition 2 (each vertex link is a 4-cycle).
Theorem 2.3
(Pseudo-smooth realisation for fixed p). Let p be any odd prime and R p the pseudo-real field from Definition 4. Then:
1. 
S p is an internal C two-dimensional submanifold of ( R p ) 4 .
2. 
L p is a finite 2-sphere CW-complex combinatorially identical to the discrete 2-spheroid of F p .
3. 
For every infinitesimal ε R p the lattice L p is an ε-net in S p ; equivalently, L p ¯ = S p in the internal topology.
4. 
The internal Gaussian curvature of S p , computed by infinitesimal triangles, is identically 1. (Proof: transfer of the classical formula for σ.)
Proof. 
(a) Smoothness follows from transfer of the real inverse-function theorem applied to σ and the coordinate projection c c . (b)Each vertex of L p has valency 4; the link is a square; the resulting complex is a flag triangulation of S 2 . (c)Given x = ( σ ( u , v ) , c ) S p choose k 1 , k 2 , k 3 F p with | u ι ( k 1 ) | , | v ι ( k 2 ) | , | c ι ( k 3 ) | < δ for an arbitrary infinitesimal δ . Lipschitz continuity of σ yields a point of L p within distance C δ . (d)Because σ is the standard rational stereographic chart, the induced first fundamental form satisfies E = G = 4 D 2 , F = 0 ; direct transfer of the classical Gauss formula gives K 1 . □
The pseudo-smooth 2-spheroid S p provides the geometric arena on which finite analogs of differential forms, spinors, and gauge fields can be developed. In forthcoming sections we connect the algebraic observer formalism of the companion paper [1] with the differential geometry of S p , paving the way toward a finite-field approach to relativistic dynamics.
Remark 2.4
(Optional characteristic-zero shadow). If one embeds R p into a characteristic-0 non-standard field (e.g. via Witt vectors), the standard-part map sends S p to an honest smooth round 2-sphere in R 4 , while collapsing L p to a 1 p -mesh refinement thereof. No such embedding is needed for the internal differential calculus used in this paper, but it can be convenient when comparing with classical geometry.
The theorem shows that every finite framed field F p already carries within itself—via its pseudo-real completion—a fully fledged smooth-like 2-sphere on which the lattice of field elements forms an arbitrarily fine pixelation.

2.3. Intrinsic Curvature of the Pseudo-Smooth 2-Spheroid S p

Recall the internal stereographic chart
σ ( u , v ) = X ( u , v ) , Y ( u , v ) , Z ( u , v ) = 2 u D , 2 v D , u 2 + v 2 1 D , D : = u 2 + v 2 + 1 ,
defined for ( u , v ) [ 0 , 1 ] p 2 R p 2 . The pseudo-smooth surface of Section 2.2 is S p = ( σ ( u , v ) , c ) u , v , c [ 0 , 1 ] p ( R p ) 4 .
Set σ u : = u σ , σ v : = v σ and abbreviate E : = σ u , σ u , F : = σ u , σ v , G : = σ v , σ v for the metric coefficients with respect to the · , · coming from the standard dot-product on ( R p ) 3 . A direct internal computation—identical to the real one—gives
E = 4 D 2 , F = 0 , G = 4 D 2 .
Because σ = 1 we may take the inward unit normal n : = σ . Let L : = σ u u , n , M : = σ u v , n , N : = σ v v , n denote the second-fundamental-form coefficients. Using σ u , σ = σ v , σ = 0 one finds
L = 2 D 2 , M = 0 , N = 2 D 2 .
With K = L N M 2 E G F 2 , H = E N + G L 2 F M 2 ( E G F 2 ) (see, e.g., [9]) one obtains
K ( u , v ) = 1 , H ( u , v ) = 1 , for all ( u , v ) [ 0 , 1 ] p 2 .
In conclusion, every point of the pseudo-smooth surface S p has constant positive Gaussian curvature K 1 and mean curvature H 1 . This explicit calculation confirms Theorem 2.3(d).
Remark. Because the fourth “count” coordinate in F ( u , v , c ) : = ( σ ( u , v ) , c ) is flat, all curvature is carried by the three stereographic coordinates. Hence S p is internally isometric to the unit round sphere in ( R p ) 3 .

3. Canonical Constants in F p

3.1. The Quarter-Turn Generator i p

Recall from [1] that, for every prime p 1 ( mod 4 ) , 1 is a quadratic residue in F p . Define the imaginary unit
i p : = min x F p | x 2 = 1 , 1 x < p 1 2 .
The interval restriction makes i p the unique square-root in the forward half-cycle of the frame order.
On the additive circle C p : = { ( x , y ) F p 2 : x 2 + y 2 = 1 } the map Q : ( x , y ) ( y , x ) corresponds to multiplication by i p ; it is the quarter-turn rotation, the discrete analog of e i π / 2 .

3.2. The Natural Exponential Base e p

In the real calculus the number e is characterized by the minimal-deviation property d d x e x | x = 0 = 1 , i.e. the exponential map coincides with the identity to first order at the origin. We translate this idea into the finite setting by choosing, among the primitive roots of F p × , the one that sits closest to 0 in the chosen cyclic order 0 1 2 p 1 0 .
  • Cyclic distance. For x F p define the additive-circle distance to the origin
    d 0 ( x ) : = min x , p x 0 , 1 , , p 1 2 .
  • Forward-time convention. To avoid the duplicity ( g , g ) of primitive roots we restrict attention to the forward half-circle
    P + : = g F p × primitive : 0 < g < p 1 2 .
    Every unordered pair { g , g } of primitive roots contributes exactly one element to P + , so the selection below is unambiguous for all odd primes p.
Definition 7
(Natural base e p ). Set
e p : = arg min x P + d 0 ( x ) = min P + .
Lemma 3.1
(Uniqueness and minimal increment). e p is the unique primitive root in the interval ( 0 , p 1 2 ) , hence the unique primitive root that minimizes both d 0 ( x ) and | x 1 | .
Proof. 
The interval ( 0 , p 1 2 ) contains no pair of additive inverses, so min P + is a single element. For any primitive root g e p we have d 0 ( g ) d 0 ( e p ) + 1 , whence | g 1 | d 0 ( g ) 1 d 0 ( e p ) = | e p 1 | . □
  • Discrete exponential and logarithm. Using e p as base define
    exp p : Z F p × , exp p ( k ) : = e p k , log e p : F p × Z / ( p 1 ) Z , log e p ( x ) = k x = e p k .
    Because | e p 1 | is minimal among primitive roots, exp p realises the smallest forward difference at the origin, Δ exp p ( 0 ) = e p 1 , mirroring e ( 0 ) = 1 .
  • Gauge covariance. Let x a x + b be an affine gauge transformation with a F p × . Multiplication by a is an automorphism of the cyclic group F p × , so it permutes primitive roots and preserves the order of their residues in ( 0 , p 1 2 ) . Translation by b fixes F p × . Consequently the image of e p under the gauge is the minimiser of (3.1) in the new frame; hence e p is a frame-invariant constant of the theory.
Remark 3.2.
For primes p 1 ( mod 4 ) the forward-time convention coincides with choosing the representative of a { ± g } pair that is closest to 0; for p 3 ( mod 4 ) it simply avoids the fact that 1 itself is a primitive root.
Thus the number e p inherits inside F p the defining property of the real constant e: it generates the discrete exponential map that deviates least from the identity at the origin, and its logarithm turns multiplicative structure into additive increments with maximal linear fidelity.

3.3. The Finite-Field Half-Period π p

The real number π is simultaneously a half-period for the rotation group of the unit circle and the factor that converts the sphere’s constant curvature into the length of a half-meridian. Both rôles have exact analogs in every finite field F p .
  • Primitive root and half-turn. Fix an odd prime p and let
    g min : = min x { 2 , , p 1 } x generates F p ×
    be the least positive primitive root in the framed order 0 1 p 1 0 . Euler’s criterion gives the well-known identity g min ( p 1 ) / 2 = 1 .
Definition 8
(Half–period integer). Set
π p : = p 1 2 Z .
π p is the unique positive integer for which g min π p = 1 .
Because ( p 1 ) / 2 depends only on p, the quantity π p is gauge-covariant: any affine relabelling x a x + b of the frame transports g min to the new least primitive root but leaves the integer π p unchanged.
  • Rotation-group interpretation. Define the additive circle C p : = { ( x , y ) F p 2 : x 2 + y 2 = 1 } . Multiplication by g min acts on C p by
    ρ : ( x , y ) ( g min x , g min y ) ,
    and the map ρ F p × , ρ k g min k identifies the rotation group of C p with the cyclic group of units. Under this identification
    ρ π p ( x , y ) = ( x , y )
    is the half-turn (antipodal) map, so π p counts exactly half the lattice points around the discrete circle, mirroring the classical equation e i π = 1 .
  • Geometric role on the pseudo-smooth spheroid. Embed F p diagonally into the pseudo-real line R p and let
    S p : = ( σ ( u , v ) , c ) : u , v , c [ 0 , 1 ] p ( R p ) 4
    be the pseudo-smooth 2-spheroid of Theorem 2.3. Its prime meridian  M p : = { ( 0 , y , z , 0 ) S p } inherits the same rotation group as C p . Stepping π p times along the lattice L p = S p ι ( F p ) 4 therefore
  • advances halfway around M p ;
  • sends each lattice point to its meridian antipode; and
  • realizes a geodesic length proportional to π p .
Since S p has constant internal curvature K 1 (Section 2.3), the Gauss-Bonnet integrand along any meridian satisfies half-meridian K d s = π p . Thus, π p converts the local curvature normalized to 1 into the global half-circumference factor, exactly as real π does on the classical unit sphere.
In summary, the constant π p = p 1 2 plays inside F p the dual rôle of the real constant π : 1. It is the half-period of the discrete rotation group on the framed circle C p ; and 2. It supplies the universal conversion factor between constant curvature and half-meridian length on the pseudo-smooth spheroid S p .
Together with the imaginary unit i p = 1 from Section 3.1 and e p from Section 3.2, the value π p completes the triple of canonical constants π p , e p , i p underpinning finite-field calculus over R p and C p . The triplet of canonical constants for the finite field F 13 is depicted in Figure 3, where the three constants i 13 = 5 , π 13 = 6 , e 13 = 2 are represented as specific elements of the finite field F 13 .

4. Harmonic Analysis in a Finite-Relativistic Setting

Classical Fourier theory over R or the circle T = R / Z decomposes functions into additive characters x e 2 π i ξ x , ξ R [18,19]. Its finite analog on a prime field F p uses the discrete additive characters χ a ( x ) = e 2 π i Tr ( a x ) / p , a F p [2,20]. Although the two theories are usually presented separately, they share a common algebraic skeleton: every cyclic group is Pontryagin self-dual. In this section we show how the constants i p , π p , e p constructed earlier provide an explicit bridge between the continuous and finite cases.

4.1. Additive Characters: Continuous and Finite

  • Continuous. On ( R , + ) the dual group is again R ; the Fourier kernel is
    K ( x , ξ ) = e 2 π i ξ x .
  • Finite. On ( F p , + ) the dual group is F p ^ F p via
    χ a ( x ) : = e 2 π i Tr ( a x ) / p .
    The discrete Fourier transform
    F F p [ f ] ( a ) = x F p f ( x ) χ a ( x )
    satisfies the finite Plancherel identity [20]
    x | f ( x ) | 2 = p 1 a | F F p f ( a ) | 2 .
The analytic and arithmetic kernels differ only by the ambient field in which the additive characters live.

4.2. Primitive Roots as Infinitesimal Rotations

Inside the pseudo-real completion R p (Definition 4) the primitive root e p ι ( F p ) R p acts like an infinitesimal rotation:
e 2 π i δ continuous generator e p finite generator , δ R infinitesimal .
Repeated multiplication by e p generates the cyclic subgroup e p of order p 1 ; its logarithm log e p : F p × Z / ( p 1 ) Z linearises multiplicative structure (Section 3.2).

4.3. Kernel Correspondence

Embed F p diagonally: ι : F p R p , a [ ( a , a , a , ) ] . For each a F p define the pseudo-continuous character
χ ˜ a ( x ) : = exp 2 π i ι ( a ) x / p , x R p .
Sampling χ ˜ a at x ι ( F p ) recovers the finite character χ a ; sampling at infinitesimal increments x = δ k with δ R yields the continuous kernel. Thus, a single analytic expression lives simultaneously in the finite and continuous worlds.
e 2 π i a x / p = χ a ( x ) for x F p , e 2 π i ξ x for ξ = a p R
Equation (4.1) realises the heuristic identifications
e 2 π i / N e p ( p 1 ) / N , N ( p 1 ) ,
promised in the introduction.

4.4. Consequences and Outlook

  • Unified Plancherel. The standard-part map sends the pseudo-Plancherel identity in R p to the classical one on R and its restriction to ι ( F p ) to the finite identity.
  • Poisson summation. Formula (4.1) implies a Poisson summation law that simultaneously contains the discrete and continuous versions; the proof follows the usual character-orthogonality argument verbatim.
  • Applications. A detailed exposition—covering pseudo-differential operators, Gauss sums, and finite-field wavelets—will appear in a separate paper. Here we record that the constants { i p , π p , e p } supply the entire character table needed for harmonic analysis in our finite-relativistic algebra.
In summary, by embedding F p into its pseudo-real completion and identifying the primitive root e p with an infinitesimal rotation, we obtain a kernel that interpolates seamlessly between the discrete and continuous Fourier transforms. Harmonic analysis thus becomes a single frame-relative theory, free of actual infinity yet capable of reproducing all classical results to arbitrary resolution.

5. Conclusions

We have shown that every odd-prime finite field F p already contains—in purely arithmetic guise—all the structural ingredients needed for a faithful analog of classical smooth geometry and harmonic analysis.
  • Discrete-to-smooth passage. Starting from the translation–scaling orbit of F p we constructed a regular CW complex N p that is combinatorially S 2 . Using the pseudo-real completion R p we lifted N p to an internal C surface S p ( R p ) 4 whose hyperfinite trace is ε -dense for every infinitesimal ε and whose Gaussian curvature satisfies K 1
  • Canonical constants. The cyclic order of F p picks out three frame-invariant elements— the quarter-turn i p , the half-period π p = p 1 2 , and the minimal-deviation base e p . Together they reproduce inside F p the algebraic rôles played by i , π , e in C and endow S p with a built-in complex-analytic flavor.
  • Unified harmonic analysis. Embedding F p into R p and identifying e p with an infinitesimal rotation yields a single kernel that specializes both to the classical Fourier kernel on R and to the discrete characters on F p . Hence Fourier, convolution, Plancherel and Poisson-summation identities coexist in one frame-relative formalism.
  • Gauge covariance. Every affine relabelling of the framed field extends to a diffeomorphism of S p and permutes i p , π p , e p in a way that preserves their defining extremal properties; the geometry is therefore fully compatible with the relativistic-algebra principle introduced in the companion papers.
  • Outlook. The techniques developed here scale naturally to higher-dimensional symmetry cubes and to composite moduli q, where the orbit complex becomes a three-manifold; Perelman’s theorem [21,22] and discrete Ricci flow [23,24] suggest a route to canonical round metrics in that setting. On the analytic side, the pseudo-smooth framework opens the way to characteristic-p versions of heat kernels [20], wavelets [25], and gauge fields [26], with potential applications to coding theory [27] and finite-precision models of quantum dynamics [28]. These directions are the subject of ongoing work.
  • By exhibiting a differential, analytic, and symmetry-rich structure generated solely from finite arithmetic data, the present article supports the thesis that finite relativistic algebra can serve as a common foundation for discrete mathematics, classical analysis, and physical modelling within a single, gauge-covariant, finite universe.

References

  1. Akhtman, Y. Relativistic Algebra over Finite Fields. Preprints 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lidl, R.; Niederreiter, H. Finite Fields, 2nd ed.; Vol. 20, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  3. Serre, J.P. A Course in Arithmetic; Springer-Verlag, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexandrov, P.S. Combinatorial Topology; Dover Publications, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldblatt, R. Lectures on the Hyperreals: An Introduction to Nonstandard Analysis; Springer: New York, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  6. Author, A. Stereographic Projection and Applications; Publisher Name, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  7. Keisler, H.J. Infinitesimal Calculus; Prindle, Weber & Schmidt, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  8. Loeb, P.A. Conversion from Nonstandard to Standard Measure Spaces and Applications in Probability Theory. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 1975, 211, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. do Carmo, M.P. Differential Geometry of Surfaces; Prentice–Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1976; See Chap. 4 for Gauss curvature and the Theorema Egregium. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mockenhaupt, G.; Tao, T. Restriction and Kakeya phenomena for finite fields. Geometric and Functional Analysis 2005, 15, 1238–1287, Seminal paper illustrating Fourier-analytic techniques (restriction, Kakeya) over finite fields. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tao, T.; Vu, V. Additive Combinatorics; Vol. 105, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2006; Includes a self-contained exposition of finite-field Fourier analysis and its combinatorial applications. [Google Scholar]
  12. Grigor’yan, A. Heat Kernel and Analysis on Manifolds; Vol. 47, AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, 2009; Comprehensive treatment of the heat equation, heat kernels, and their relation to geometry. [Google Scholar]
  13. Baez, J.C.; Muniain, J.P. Gauge Fields, Knots and Gravity; World Scientific: Singapore, 1994; Friendly introduction to gauge symmetry, covariant derivatives, and their geometric meaning. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dummit, D.S.; Foote, R.M. Abstract Algebra; John Wiley & Sons, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rotman, J.J. Introduction to the Theory of Groups, 4th ed.; Springer, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  16. Burton, D.M. Elementary Number Theory, 7th ed.; McGraw-Hill, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hatcher, A. Algebraic Topology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2002; Freely available from the author’s webpage. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rudin, W. Fourier Analysis on Groups; Wiley, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  19. Stein, E.M.; Shakarchi, R. Fourier Analysis: An Introduction; Princeton University Press, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  20. Terras, A. Fourier Analysis on Finite Groups and Applications; Cambridge University Press, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  21. Perelman, G. The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications. arXiv preprint math/0211159 2002. [Google Scholar]
  22. Perelman, G. Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds. arXiv preprint math/0303109 2003. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chow, B.; et al. The Ricci Flow: Techniques and Applications. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 2004, 135. [Google Scholar]
  24. Forman, R. Bochner’s method for cell complexes and combinatorial Ricci curvature. Discrete & Computational Geometry 2003, 29, 323–374. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kozyrev, S.V. Wavelet Theory as p-Adic Spectral Analysis. Izvestiya: Mathematics 2002, 66, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Baez, J.C. Gauge Fields, Knots and Gravity; World Scientific, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  27. MacWilliams, F.J.; Sloane, N.J.A. The Theory of Error-Correcting Codes; North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  28. Schwinger, J. Unitary Operator Bases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1960, 46, 570–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
1
In non-standard analysis a set, function, or manifold is called internal if it lives entirely inside the ultrapower universe: it can be represented by an equivalence class of standard sequences and therefore inherits every first-order property of its classical counterpart via the Transfer Principle [5].
Figure 1. Diagram of a finite Ring Z 13 , typically visualized as a circle on a 2D plane that illustrates its periodicity and rotational symmetry under the arithmetic operation of addition.
Figure 1. Diagram of a finite Ring Z 13 , typically visualized as a circle on a 2D plane that illustrates its periodicity and rotational symmetry under the arithmetic operation of addition.
Preprints 161932 g001
Figure 2. State diagram for finite framed field F 13 as a 2D spheroid in 4D symmetry space combining the symmetry dimensions of the additive group—along the prime meridian—, and multiplicative group—along the latitudes for multiplicative generator g min = 2 .
Figure 2. State diagram for finite framed field F 13 as a 2D spheroid in 4D symmetry space combining the symmetry dimensions of the additive group—along the prime meridian—, and multiplicative group—along the latitudes for multiplicative generator g min = 2 .
Preprints 161932 g002
Figure 3. Diagram of the finite field Z 13 , showing the canonical constants i 13 = 5 , π 13 = 6 , and e 13 = 2 as elements of the field.
Figure 3. Diagram of the finite field Z 13 , showing the canonical constants i 13 = 5 , π 13 = 6 , and e 13 = 2 as elements of the field.
Preprints 161932 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated