Submitted:
22 May 2025
Posted:
22 May 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Participants
2.2. Data Collection
2.2.1. Demographic and Anthropometric Characteristics
- Age (years)
- Body mass index (BMI), calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m²). BMI values were classified as underweight (<18.5 kg/m²), normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m²), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m²), or obese (≥30 kg/m²).
- Tobacco use. We categorized the patient population into three groups based on tobacco use: never smokers, current smokers, and former smokers
- Physical activity. We categorized the patient population based on their levels of physical activity into four groups: none, sporadic, regular with low intensity, and regular with high intensity.
2.2.2. Rheumatoid Arthritis-Related Variables
-
Disease history, including:
- ○
- Duration since RA diagnosis (years)
- ○
- Current pharmacologic regimen, encompassing glucocorticoids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors
- ○
- Seropositivity for rheumatoid factor (RF)
- ○
- Presence of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA)
-
Laboratory data, based on the most recent available tests:
- ○
- Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)
- ○
- C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration
- ○
- Hemoglobin levels
- ○
- Albumin levels
-
Assessment of disease activity. It was conducted using two validated instruments:
- ○
- Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) (21), which includes the count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28), ESR, and patient global assessment of disease activity. Interpretation of the score: remission (<2.6), low activity (2.6–3.2), moderate activity (>3.2–5.1), and high disease activity (>5.1).
- ○
- Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) (22), a patient-reported outcome measure combining pain, physical function, and global assessment. Score categories: remission (≤3), low activity (3.1–6), moderate activity (6.1–12), and high activity (>12).
- Functional disability was measured using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (23), with scores ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability).
- Fatigue assessment. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) scale (24) was employed to measure fatigue levels. This scale includes items rated on a scale from 0 to 4, yielding a total possible score that ranges from 0 to 52, where lower scores signify greater levels of fatigue.
- Health-related quality of life was evaluated using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) (25), which measures physical and mental health through eight domains. Two summary scores were derived: a Physical Component Summary and a Mental Component Summary, computed using population-weighted algorithms.
2.2.3. Sarcopenia Evaluation
- Muscle strength was measured using a calibrated Jamar-type digital hand dynamometer (Kern 80K1). The highest value obtained from two attempts per hand (using the dominant hand) was recorded. Impaired value was defined as grip strength <16 kg.
- Physical performance was assessed via gait speed. Participants were instructed to walk a straight 6-metre path at a comfortable pace, timed with a stopwatch. A gait speed <0.8 m/s was considered impaired
- Skeletal muscle mass was estimated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) on a Hologic Horizon W device (Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA). Appendicular skeletal muscle mass was indexed to height squared (SMI = ASM/height²). An SMI ≤5.67 kg/m² was used as the diagnostic threshold.
- Sarcopenia screening was performed with the SARC-F questionnaire (26), comprising five items: strength, ability to walk, getting up from a chair, climbing stairs, and frequency of falls. Each item is scored from 0 to 2; total scores ≥4 suggest possible sarcopenia and prompt further evaluation.
- Diagnostic classification. Sarcopenia was defined according to EWGSOP-2 (10). In this way, confirmed sarcopenia was diagnosed when low muscle strength was accompanied by low muscle mass in patients with a SARC-F score ≥ 4.
2.2.4. Malnutrition Assessment
2.2.5. Bone Evaluation
- Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD) Assessment. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by DXA using a Horizon Wi densitometer (Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA, USA), with areal BMD (aBMD) values expressed in g/cm². Daily calibration was performed using a lumbar spine phantom, with an in vitro coefficient of variation consistently below 1%. T-scores and Z-scores for the lumbar spine were calculated using reference data from the Spanish Multicentre Research Project on Osteoporosis (MRPO) (27), and those for the proximal femur were based on the NHANES III database (28). Classification of osteopenia and osteoporosis followed World Health Organization criteria and the official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (29).
- Trabecular Bone Score (TBS). It was performed in 60 patients. TBS was derived from lumbar spine DXA scans using TBS iNsight software (version 3.0; Medimaps Group). Analysis was limited to individuals with BMI values between 15 and 35 kg/m². TBS values were interpreted (30) as follows: ≥1.350 (normal microarchitecture), 1.200–1.349 (partially degraded), and ≤1.200 (degraded microarchitecture).
- Three-Dimensional DXA (3D-DXA) Analysis. It was performed in 54 patients using 3D-Shaper-Research software v.2.14 (3D-Shaper Medical, Barcelona, Spain). At the total hip, the following parameters were evaluated: cortical surface BMD (sBMD, mg/cm2) and trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD, mg/cm3). Classification in normal, low and very low categories were calculated based on reference data from the Spanish population included in the SEIOMM-3D-DXA project (31).
2.2.6. Definition of Osteosarcopenia
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Di Matteo A, Bathon J, Emery P. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2023;402:2019–2033. [CrossRef]
- Sparks JA, Harrold LR, Simon TA, Wittstock K, Kelly S, Lozenski K, Khaychuk V, Michaud K. Comparative effectiveness of treatments for rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2023;62:152249. [CrossRef]
- Espinoza G, Maldonado G, Narvaez J, Guerrero R, Citera G, Rios C. Beyond rheumatoid arthritis evaluation: what are we missing? Open Access Rheumatol 2021;13:45–55. [CrossRef]
- Schuetz P, Seres D, Lobo DN, Gomes F, Kaegi-Braun N, Stanga Z. Management of disease-related malnutrition for patients being treated in hospital. Lancet 2021;398:1927–1938. [CrossRef]
- Olsen MN, Tangvik RJ, Halse AK. Evaluation of nutritional status and methods to identify nutritional risk in rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis. Nutrients 2020;12:3571. [CrossRef]
- Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia MITD, Gonzalez MC, Fukushima R, Higashiguchi T, Baptista G, Barazzoni R, Blaauw R, Coats A, Crivelli A, Evans DC, Gramlich L, Keller H, Llido L, Malone A, Mogensen KM, Müller M, Muscaritoli M, Nyulasi I, Pirlich M, Prado CM, Robinson S, Rolland Y, Schneider SM, de van der Schueren M, Sieber C, Singer P, Tappenden K, Valentini L, Yeh DD. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition—a consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Clin Nutr 2019;38:1–9. [CrossRef]
- Bellanti F, Lo Buglio A, Quiete S, Pellegrino G, Dobrakowski M, Kasperczyk A, Kasperczyk S, Vendemiale G. Comparison of three nutritional screening tools with the new GLIM criteria for malnutrition and association with sarcopenia in hospitalized older patients. J Clin Med 2020;9:1898. [CrossRef]
- Nishioka S, Matsushita T, Yamanouchi A, Okazaki Y, Oishi K, Nishioka E, Mori N, Tokunaga Y, Onizuka S. Prevalence and associated factors of coexistence of malnutrition and sarcopenia in geriatric rehabilitation. Nutrients 2021;13:3745. [CrossRef]
- Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Sayer AA. Sarcopenia. Lancet 2019;393:2636–2646. [CrossRef]
- Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, Schneider SM, Sieber CC, Topinková E, Vandewoude M, Visser M, Zamboni M. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019;48:16–31. [CrossRef]
- Brance ML, Di Gregorio S, Pons-Estel BA, Quagliato NJ, Jorfen M, Berbotto G, Lopez C, Barile-Fabris L, Alvarez-Hernandez E, Jaller JJ, Cardiel MH, Massardo L, Soriano ER. Prevalence of sarcopenia and whole-body composition in rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol 2021;27(Suppl 1):S153–S160. [CrossRef]
- Cano-García L, Manrique-Arija S, Domínguez-Quesada C, Vacas-Pérez JC, Armenteros-Ortiz PJ, Ruiz-Vilchez D, Carmona L. Sarcopenia and nutrition in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients: a cross-sectional study to determine prevalence and risk factors. Nutrients 2023;15:2440. [CrossRef]
- Valencia-Muntalà L, Gómez-Vaquero C, Mora M, Berbel-Arcobé L, Benavent D, Narváez J, Rozadilla A, Nolla JM. Evaluating sarcopenia prevalence and SARC-F effectiveness in elderly Spanish women with RA: a comparative study of EWGSOP criteria. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024;11:1392604. [CrossRef]
- Binkley N, Buehring B. Beyond FRAX: it’s time to consider “sarco-osteopenia.” J Clin Densitom 2009;12:413. [CrossRef]
- Hirschfeld HP, Kinsella R, Duque G. Osteosarcopenia: where bone, muscle, and fat collide. Osteoporos Int 2017;28:2781–2790. [CrossRef]
- Laskou F, Fuggle NR, Patel HP, Jameson K, Cooper C, Dennison E. Associations of osteoporosis and sarcopenia with frailty and multimorbidity among participants of the Hertfordshire Cohort Study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2022;13:220–229. [CrossRef]
- Paulin TK, Malmgren L, McGuigan FE, Akesson KE. Osteosarcopenia: prevalence and 10-year fracture and mortality risk—a longitudinal, population-based study of 75-year-old women. Calcif Tissue Int 2024;114:315–325. [CrossRef]
- Sepúlveda-Loyola W, Phu S, Bani Hassan E, Brennan-Olsen SL, Zanker J, Vogrin S, Conzade R, Kirk B, Al Saedi A, Probst V, Duque G. The joint occurrence of osteoporosis and sarcopenia (osteosarcopenia): definitions and characteristics. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020;21:220–225. [CrossRef]
- Huo YR, Suriyaarachchi P, Gomez F, Curcio CL, Boersma D, Muir SW, Montero-Odasso M, Gunawardene P, Demontiero O, Duque G. Phenotype of osteosarcopenia in older individuals with a history of falling. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015;16:290–295. [CrossRef]
- Tada M, Yamada Y, Mandai K, Matsumoto Y, Hidaka N. Osteosarcopenia synergistically increases the risk of falls in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 2021;7:140–145. [CrossRef]
- Mäkinen H, Kautiainen H, Hannonen P, Möttönen T, Korpela M, Leirisalo-Repo M. Disease activity score 28 as an instrument to measure disease activity in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2007;34:1987–1991.
- Pincus T, Bergman MJ, Yazici Y, Hines P, Raghupathi K, Maclean R. An index of only patient-reported outcome measures, Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), in two abatacept clinical trials: similar results to disease activity score (DAS28) and other RAPID indices that include physician-reported measures. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008;47:345–349. [CrossRef]
- Esteve-Vives J, Batlle-Gualda E, Reig A. Spanish version of the health assessment questionnaire: reliability, validity, and transcultural equivalency. J Rheumatol 1993;20:2116–2122.
- Webster K, Cella D, Yost K. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System: properties, applications, and interpretation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:79. [CrossRef]
- Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220–233. [CrossRef]
- Malmstrom TK, Morley JE. SARC-F: a simple questionnaire to rapidly diagnose sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2013;14:531–532.
- Díaz Curiel M, Carrasco de la Peña JL, Honorato Perez J, Perez Cano R, Rapado A, Ruiz MI. Study of bone mineral density in lumbar spine and femoral neck in a Spanish population: Multicentre Research Project on Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1997;7:59–64.
- Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP, Johnston CC Jr, Lindsay R. Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 1998;8:468–489.
- Shuhart CR, Yeap SS, Anderson PA, Jankowski LG, Lewiecki EM, Morse LR, Rosen HN, Whitford GM, Zanchetta JR, Shepherd JA, Gordon CM. Executive summary of the 2019 ISCD Position Development Conference on monitoring treatment, DXA cross-calibration and least significant change, spinal cord injury, peri-prosthetic and orthopedic bone health, transgender medicine, and pediatrics. J Clin Densitom 2019;22:453–471. [CrossRef]
- Pothuaud L, Barthe N, Krieg MA, Mehsen N, Carceller P, Hans D. Evaluation of the potential use of trabecular bone score to complement bone mineral density in the diagnosis of osteoporosis: a preliminary spine BMD–matched, case-control study. J Clin Densitom 2009;12:170–176.
- Vázquez Gámez MA, Giner García MM, Montoya García MJ, Casado E, Di Gregorio S, Valero Díaz de Lamadrid C, González Macías J, Olmos Martínez JM, Arboiro Pinel RM, Diaz Curiel M, Cortes-Berdonces M, Jodar Gimeno E, Barceló Bru M, Pérez Castrillón JL, García Fontana B, Munoz Torres M, Aguado Acín P, Tornero-Marín C, Sosa Henríquez M, Hawkins Carranza FG, et al. Age-related reference data for cortical and trabecular 3D-DXA parameters: the SEIOMM-3D-DXA Project. J Bone Miner Res. 2024;39 (Suppl1):148. [CrossRef]
- Rasschaert M, Vandecandelaere P, Marechal S, D'hondt R, Vulsteke C, Mailleux M, De Roock W, Van Erps J, Himpe U, De Man M, Mertens G, Ysebaert D. Malnutrition prevalence in cancer patients in Belgium: The ONCOCARE study. Support Care Cancer 2024;32:135. [CrossRef]
- Enge M, Peelen FO, Nielsen RL, Beck AM, Olin AÖ, Cederholm T, Boström AM, Paur I. Malnutrition prevalence according to GLIM and its feasibility in geriatric patients: a prospective cross-sectional study. Eur J Nutr 2024;63:927–938. [CrossRef]
- Siris ES, Chen YT, Abbott TA, Barrett-Connor E, Miller PD, Wehren LE, Berger ML. Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1108–1112. [CrossRef]
- Buttgereit F, Palmowski A, Bond M, Adami G, Dejaco C. Osteoporosis and fracture risk are multifactorial in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2024;20:417–431. [CrossRef]
- Li TH, Chang YS, Liu CW, Su CF, Tsai HC, Tsao YP, Liao HT, Chen MH, Chuang CC, Yang YY, Tsai CY. The prevalence and risk factors of sarcopenia in rheumatoid arthritis patients: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2021;51:236–245. [CrossRef]
- Augat P, Schorlemmer S. The role of cortical bone and its microstructure in bone strength. Age Ageing. 2006;35(Suppl 2):ii27–ii31. [CrossRef]
- Zhang J, Wang X, Fang J, Li Y, Yu Y, Wang J, Sun B. Contributions of dietary patterns and factors to regulation of rheumatoid disease. Int J Mol Sci 2025;26:2674. [CrossRef]
| All Patients (n: 65) |
Without Malnutrition (n: 33) |
With Malnutrition (n: 32) |
p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 72.6 ± 6.3 | 72.7 ± 5.5 | 72.5 ± 7.0 | ns |
|
BMI (kg/m2) Underweight (n, %) Normal range (n, %) Overweight (n, %) Obese (n, %) |
27.3 ± 4.8 0 23 (35.4%) 24 (36.9%) 18 (27.7%) |
30.8 ± 3.7 0 1 (3.0%) 15 (45.5%) 17 (51.5%) |
23.8 ± 2.8 0 22 (68.8%) 9 (28.1%) 1 (3.1%) |
< 0.001 < 0.001 |
|
Tobacco use Never Ever |
57 (87.7%) 8 (12.3%) |
29 (87.9%) 4 !2.1%) |
28 (87.5%) 4 (12.5%) |
ns |
|
Physical activity No Sporadic Regular with low intensity |
31 (47.7%) 13 (20.0%) 21 (32.3%) |
14 (42.4%) 8 (24.3%) 11 (33.3%) |
17 (53.1%) 5 (15.6%) 10 (31.3%) |
ns |
| Disease duration (years) | 17.9 ± 9.8 | 18.3 ± 9.9 | 17.4 ± 9.7 | < 0.05 |
|
Current medication Glucocorticoids (n,%) cDMARDs (n,%) bDMARDs (n, %) Jak inhibitors (n,%) |
30 (46.2%) 57 (87.7%) 27 (41.5%) 1 (1.5%) |
18 (54.5%) 30 (90.9%) 11 (33.3%) 0 |
12 (37.5%) 27 (84.4%) 16 (50.0%) 1 (3.1%) |
ns ns ns ns |
|
RF seropositivity (n, %) RF titer |
40 (70.2%) 150.3 ± 271.4 |
22 (75.9%) 201.4 ± 383.6 |
18 (64.3%) 106.2 ± 98.7 |
ns ns |
|
ACPA positive (n, %) ACPA titer |
45 (76.3%) 249.5 ± 379.4 |
26 (83.9%) 181.8 ± 208.5 |
19 (67.9%) 335.1 ± 516.2 |
ns ns |
| ESR (mm/h) | 22.7 ± 16.6 | 22.6 ± 15.9 | 22.8 ± 17.5 | ns |
| CRP (mg/dL) | 4.70 ± 7.0 | 5.2 ± 6.5 | 4.2 ± 7.6 | ns |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 13.5 ± 1.0 | 13.5 ± 1.1 | 13.4 ± 0.9 | ns |
| Albumin (g/L) | 43.9 ± 3.8 | 43.2 ± 4.0 | 44.6 ± 3.4 | ns |
|
DAS28 Remission (n, %) Low disease activity (n,%) Moderate disease activity (n,%) High disease activity (n,%) |
2.8 ± 1.0 28 (43.1%) 20 (30.8%) 16 (24.6%) 1 (1.5%) |
2.8 ± 1.0 16 (48.5%) 8 (24.2%) 8 (24.2%) 1 (3.0%) |
2.8 ± 1.0 12 (37.5%) 12 (37.5%) 8 (25.0%) 0 (0%) |
ns ns |
|
RAPID3 Remission (n, %) Low disease activity (n, %) Moderate disease activity (n, %) High disease activity (n, %) |
9.7 ± 7.4 19 (30.2%) 3 (4.8%) 19 (30.2%) 22(34.9%) |
11.2 ± 7.5 8 (25.0%) 0 (0%) 10 (31.3%) 14 (43.8%) |
8.2 ± 7.1 11 (35.5%) 3 (9.7) 9 (29.0%) 8 (25.8%) |
ns ns |
| HAQ | 0.15 ± 0.34 |
0.23 ± 0.47 | 0.07 ± 0.09 | ns |
|
FACIT-F |
35.4 ± 9.9 |
33.6 ± 10.3 |
37.2 ± 9.2 |
ns |
|
SF-12 Mental health Physical health |
44.5 ± 11,4 37.5 ± 9.2 |
42.9 ± 11.5 36.7 ± 9.7 |
46.1 ± 11.3 38.3 ± 8.8 |
ns ns |
| Grip strength < 16 g (n, %) | 39/65 (60.0%) | 21 (63.6%) | 18 (56.3%) | ns |
| Gait speed < 0.8 m/s (n, %) | 18 (27.7%) | 11 (33.3%) | 7 (21.9%) | ns |
|
SMI SMI ≤ 5,67 Kg/m2 (n, %) |
5.46 ± 0.80 40 (61.5%) |
5.96 ± 0.56 10 (30.3%) |
4.94 ± 0.66 30 (93.8%) |
< 0.001 < 0.001 |
| FFMI, Kg/m2 | 14.9 ± 2.0 | 16.4 ± 1.3 | 13.3 ± 1.1 | < 0.001 |
| Lumbar aBMD (g/cm2) | 0.905 ± 0.134 | 0.949 ± 0.125 | 0.856 ± 0.131 | < 0.01 |
| Femoral neck aBMD (g/cm2) | 0.678 ± 0.939 | 0.700 ± 0.088 | 0.658 ± 0.097 | ns |
| Total femur aBMD (g/cm2) | 0.862 ± 0.118 | 0.914 ± 0.101 | 0.811 ± 0.113 | < 0.001 |
|
Trabecular Bone Score Normal Partially degraded Totally degraded |
1.261 ± 0.093 21 (35%) 14 (23%) 25 (42%) |
1.262 ± 0.095 10 (26%) 16 (41%) 13 (33%) |
1.261 ± 0.093 11 (35%) 8 (26%) 12 (39%) |
ns ns |
|
Cortical sBMD, mg/cm2 Normal cortical sBMD Low cortical sBMD Very low cortical sBMD |
146.77 ± 24.10 27 (50%) 23 (43%) 4 (7%) |
155.46 ± 21.92 19 (73%) 6 (23%) 1 (4%) |
138.70 ± 23.57 8 (28%) 17 (61%) 3 (11%) |
< 0.01 < 0.01 |
|
Trabecular vBMD, mg/cm3 Normal trabecular vBMD Low trabecular vBMD Very low trabecular vBMD |
157.14 ± 31.87 24 (44%) 27 (50%) 3 (6%) |
165.67 ± 29.47 16 (61%) 9 (35%) 1(4%) |
149.22 ± 32.47 8 (29%) 18 (64%) 2(7%) |
ns < 0.01 |
| All Patients (n: 65) |
Without Osteosarcopenia (n: 31) |
With Osteosarcopenia (n: 34) |
p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 72.6 ± 6.3 | 70.2 ± 4.6 | 74.8 ± 6.8 | < 0.01 |
|
BMI (kg/m2) Underweight (n, %) Normal range (n, %) Overweight (n, %) Obese (n, %) |
27.3 ± 4.8 0 23 (35.4%) 24 (36.9%) 18 (27.7%) |
28.9 ± 5.2 0 8 (25.8%) 10 (32.2%) 13(42.0%) |
25.9 ± 4.0 0 15 (44.1%) 14 (41.1%) 5 (14.8%) |
< 0.05 < 0.05 |
|
Tobacco use Never Ever |
57 (87.7%) 8 (12.3%) |
27 (87.1%) 4 (12.9%) |
30 (88.2%) 4 (11.8%) |
ns |
|
Physical activity No Sporadic Regular with low intensity |
31 (47.7%) 13 (20.0%) 21 (32.3%) |
10 (32.2%) 7 (22.6%) 14 (45.2%) |
21 (61.8%) 6 (17.6%) 7 (20.6%) |
< 0.05 |
| Disease duration (years) | 17.9 ± 9.8 | 16.2 ± 10.2 | 19.3 ± 9.2 | ns |
|
Current medication Glucocorticoids (n,%) cDMARDs (n,%) bDMARDs (n, %) Jak inhibitors (n,%) |
30 (46.2%) 57 (87.7%) 27 (41.5%) 1 (1.5%) |
11 (35.5%) 30 (96.8%) 10 (32.3%) 0 |
19 (55.9%) 27 (79.4%) 17 (50.0%) 1 (3.0%) |
ns < 0.05 ns ns |
|
RF seropositivity (n, %) RF titer |
40 (70.2%) 150.3 ± 271.4 |
19 (65.5%) 175.0 ± 340.1 |
21 (75.0%) 129.0 ± 201.2 |
ns ns |
|
ACPA positive (n, %) ACPA titer |
45 (76.3%) 249.5 ± 379.4 |
23 (74.2%) 135.3 ± 132.7 |
22 (64.7%) 369.1 ± 504.4 |
ns < 0.05 |
| ESR (mm/h) | 22.7 ± 16.6 | 22.2 ± 16.2 | 23.1 ± 17.1 | ns |
| CRP (mg/dL) | 4.70 ± 7.0 | 3.5 ± 3.1 | 5.7 ± 9.2 | ns |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 13.5 ± 1.0 | 13.9 ± 0.9 | 13.1 ± 0.9 | < 0.01 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 43.9 ± 3.8 | 43.8 ± 4.3 | 43.9 ± 3.3 | ns |
|
DAS28 Remission (n, %) Low disease activity (n,%) Moderate disease activity (n,%) High disease activity (n,%) |
2.8 ± 1.0 28 (43.1%) 20 (30.8%) 16 (24.6%) 1 (1.5%) |
2.6 ± 0.9 17 (54.8%) 8 (25.8%) 6 (19.4%) 0 |
3.0 ± 1.0 11 (32.3%) 12 (35.3%) 10 (29.4%) 1 (3.0%) |
ns ns |
|
RAPID3 Remission (n, %) Low disease activity (n, %) Moderate disease activity (n, %) High disease activity (n, %) |
9.7 ± 7.4 19 (30.2%) 3 (4.8%) 19 (30.2%) 22(34.9%) |
8.6 ± 7.5 11 (37.9%) 1 (3.4%) 8 (27.6%) 9 (31.1%) |
10.7 ± 7.3 8 (23.5%) 2 (5.9%) 11 (32.3%) 13 (38.3%) |
ns ns |
| HAQ | 0.15 ± 0.34 |
0.08 ± 0.10 |
0.23 ± 0.46 | ns |
|
FACIT-F |
35.4 ± 9.9 |
36.6 ± 10.8 |
34.3 ± 9.0 |
ns |
|
SF-12 Mental health Physical health |
44.5 ± 11,4 37.5 ± 9.2 |
46.4 ± 10.9 38.0 ± 9.9 |
42.7 ± 11.7 37.1 ± 8.7 |
ns ns |
| Grip strength < 16 g (n, %) | 39 (60.0%) | 8 (25.8%) | 31 (91.2%) | < 0.001 |
| Gait speed < 0.8 m/s (n, %) | 18 (27.7%) | 2 (6.5%) | 16 (47.1%) | < 0.001 |
|
SMI SMI ≤ 5,67 Kg/m2 (n, %) |
5.46 ± 0.80 40 (61.5%) |
5.71 ± 0.61 14 (45.2%) |
5.21 ± 0.86 26 (76.5%) |
< 0.05 < 0.01 |
| FFMI, Kg/m2 | ||||
| Lumbar spine aBMD (g/cm2) | 0.905 ± 0.134 | 0.944 ± 0.138 | 0.868 ± 0.122 | < 0.05 |
| Femoral neck aBMD (g/cm2) | 0.678 ± 0.939 | 0.716 ± 0.085 | 0.645 ± 0.089 | < 0.01 |
| Total hip aBMD (g/cm2) | 0.862 ± 0.118 | 0.917 ± 0.104 | 0.813 ± 0.108 | < 0.001 |
|
Trabecular Bone Score Normal Partially degraded Totally degraded |
1.261 ± 0.093 21 (35%) 14 (23%) 25 (42%) |
1.268 ± 0.099 10 (37%) 5 (19%) 12 (44%) |
1.255 ± 0.088 11 (33%) 9 (27%) 13 (40%) |
ns ns |
|
Cortical sBMD, mg/cm2 Normal cortical sBMD Low cortical sBMD Very low cortical sBMD |
146.77 ± 24.10 27 (50%) 23 (43%) 4 (7%) |
156.92 ± 21.68 17 (65%) 9 (35%) 0 |
137.34 ± 22.67 10 (36%) 14 (50%) 4 (14%) |
< 0.01 < 0.05 |
|
Trabecular vBMD, mg/cm3 Normal trabecular vBMD Low trabecular vBMD Very low trabecular vBMD |
157.14 ± 31.87 24 (44%) 27 (50%) 3 (6%) |
167.83 ± 31.0 17 (65%) 9 (35%) 0 |
147.22 ± 29.86 7 (25%) 18 (64%) 3 (11%) |
< 0.05 < 0.01 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
