Submitted:
09 May 2025
Posted:
09 May 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Computational Methods
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Electron Energy and Thermodynamic Parameters
3.2. Reaction Path
3.3. Reaction Rate Calculations
4. Conclusion
Supplementary Materials
References
- Atkinson, R.; Arey, J. Atmospheric Degradation of Volatile Organic Compounds. Chemical Reviews. 2003, 103, 4605–4638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fang, Y.; et al. Communication: Real time observation of unimolecular decay of Criegee intermediates to OH radical products. J Chem Phys. 2016, 144, 061102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taatjes, C. A.; et al. Direct Measurements of Conformer-Dependent Reactivity of the Criegee Intermediate CH3CHOO. Science. 2013, 340, 177–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chao, W.; et al. Direct kinetic measurement of the reaction of the simplest Criegee intermediate with water vapor. Science. 2015, 347, 751–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mauldin Iii, R. L.; et al. A new atmospherically relevant oxidant of sulphur dioxide. Nature. 2012, 488, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Misiewicz, J. P.; et al. Re-examining ammonia addition to the Criegee intermediate: converging to chemical accuracy. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018, 20, 7479–7491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, M.; et al. Criegee Intermediate Reaction with CO: Mechanism, Barriers, Conformer-Dependence, and Implications for Ozonolysis Chemistry. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2014, 118, 1887–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.-H.; et al. Reactivity of Criegee Intermediates toward Carbon Dioxide. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2018, 9, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Y.-P.; et al. Kinetics of the simplest Criegee intermediate reaction with ozone studied using a mid-infrared quantum cascade laser spectrometer. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2018, 20, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; et al. Role of the reaction of stabilized Criegee intermediates with peroxy radicals in particle formation and growth in air. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2015, 17, 12500–12514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tadayon, S. V.; et al. Kinetics of the Reactions between the Criegee Intermediate CH2OO and Alcohols. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2018, 122, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jalan, A.; et al. Chemically activated formation of organic acids in reactions of the Criegee intermediate with aldehydes and ketones. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2013, 15, 16841–16852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Decker, Z. C. J.; et al. Direct experimental probing and theoretical analysis of the reaction between the simplest Criegee intermediate CH2OO and isoprene. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2017, 19, 8541–8551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sakamoto, Y.; et al. Oligomerization Reaction of the Criegee Intermediate Leads to Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation in Ethylene Ozonolysis. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2013, 117, 12912–12921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neeb, P.; et al. Formation of hydroxymethyl hydroperoxide and formic acid in alkene ozonolysis in the presence of water vapour. Atmospheric Environment. 1997, 31, 1417–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tobias, H. J.; Ziemann, P. J. Kinetics of the Gas-Phase Reactions of Alcohols, Aldehydes, Carboxylic Acids, and Water with the C13 Stabilized Criegee Intermediate Formed from Ozonolysis of 1-Tetradecene. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2001, 105, 6129–6135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sipilä, M.; et al. Reactivity of stabilized Criegee intermediates (sCIs) from isoprene and monoterpene ozonolysis toward SO<sub>2</sub> and organic acids. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 12143–12153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Welz, O.; et al. Rate coefficients of C(1) and C(2) Criegee intermediate reactions with formic and acetic Acid near the collision limit: direct kinetics measurements and atmospheric implications. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014, 53, 4547–4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, D.; et al. The Effect of Criegee-Intermediate Scavengers on the OH Yield from the Reaction of Ozone with 2-methylbut-2-ene. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2001, 105, 2933–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vereecken, L.; et al. The reaction of Criegee intermediates with NO, RO2, and SO2, and their fate in the atmosphere. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2012, 14, 14682–14695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peltola, J.; et al. Time-resolved, broadband UV-absorption spectrometry measurements of Criegee intermediate kinetics using a new photolytic precursor: unimolecular decomposition of CH2OO and its reaction with formic acid. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2020, 22, 11797–11808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gaussian, R.; et al. Gaussian, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT. 2004.
- Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts. 2008, 120, 215–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neese, F. Software update: the ORCA program system, version 4.0. WIREs Computational Molecular Science. 2018, 8, e1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neese, F. Software update: The ORCA program system—Version 5.0. WIREs Computational Molecular Science. 2022, 12, e1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, T. J. Comparison of the T1 and D1 diagnostics for electronic structure theory: a new definition for the open-shell D1 diagnostic. Chemical Physics Letters. 2003, 372, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rienstra-Kiracofe, J. C.; et al. The C2H5 + O2 Reaction Mechanism: High-Level ab Initio Characterizations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2000, 104, 9823–9840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, M. T.; et al. Heats of formation of the Criegee formaldehyde oxide and dioxirane. Chemical Physics Letters. 2007, 448, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vereecken, L.; et al. Theoretical Chemical Kinetics in Tropospheric Chemistry: Methodologies and Applications. Chemical Reviews. 2015, 115, 4063–4114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pople, J. A.; et al. Spin-unrestricted character of Kohn-Sham orbitals for open-shell systems. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry. 1995, 56, 303–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, A. P.; Radom, L. Harmonic Vibrational Frequencies: An Evaluation of Hartree−Fock, Møller−Plesset, Quadratic Configuration Interaction, Density Functional Theory, and Semiempirical Scale Factors. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1996, 100, 16502–16513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kesharwani, M. K.; et al. Frequency and Zero-Point Vibrational Energy Scale Factors for Double-Hybrid Density Functionals (and Other Selected Methods): Can Anharmonic Force Fields Be Avoided? The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2015, 119, 1701–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nakajima, M.; Endo, Y. Communication: Determination of the molecular structure of the simplest Criegee intermediate CH2OO. J Chem Phys. 2013, 139, 101103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aroeira, G. J. R.; et al. The addition of methanol to Criegee intermediates. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2019, 21, 17760–17771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, T.; Chen, Q. Shermo: A general code for calculating molecular thermochemistry properties. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry. 2021, 1200, 113249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; et al. Direct observation of vinyl hydroperoxide. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2015, 17, 20490–20494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabezas, C.; Endo, Y. Observation of hydroperoxyethyl formate from the reaction between the methyl Criegee intermediate and formic acid. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2020, 22, 446–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aplincourt, P.; Ruiz-López, M. F. Theoretical Study of Formic Acid Anhydride Formation from Carbonyl Oxide in the Atmosphere. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2000, 104, 380–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Ramos, A.; et al. Modeling the Kinetics of Bimolecular Reactions. Chemical Reviews. 2006, 106, 4518–4584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, J. L.; Truhlar, D. G. Variational transition state theory: theoretical framework and recent developments. Chemical Society Reviews. 2017, 46, 7548–7596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skodje, R. T.; et al. A general small-curvature approximation for transition-state-theory transmission coefficients. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1981, 85, 3019–3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chhantyal-Pun, R.; et al. (2018). Criegee Intermediate-Carboxylic Acid Reactions, A Potential Source for Secondary Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere.
- Berndt, T.; et al. Direct Probing of Criegee Intermediates from Gas-Phase Ozonolysis Using Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2017, 139, 13387–13392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Behera, B.; et al. Mechanism and kinetics of the reaction of the Criegee intermediate CH2OO with acetic acid studied using a step-scan Fourier-transform IR spectrometer. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2022, 24, 18568–18581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]



| Parameters | Experimental[33] | CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pV5Z[33] | CCSD(T)/ANO1[6] | This study |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bond O-O (Å) | 1.345 | 1.341 | 1.342 | 1.338 |
| Bond O-C | 1.272 | 1.268 | 1.277 | 1.270 |
| (cis) Bond C-H | 1.094 | 1.082 | 1.085 | |
| (trans) Bond C-H | 1.088 | 1.079 | 1.082 | |
| Angle O-O-C (deg.) | 118.02 | 117.95 | 118.00 | 118.95 |
| (cis) Angle H-C-O | 117.96 | 118.62 | 118.68 | |
| (trans)Angle H-C-O | 114.862 | 114.86 | 115.86 |
| Reaction | Estab | Ea | ΔE |
|---|---|---|---|
| CH2OO+CHOOH | -46.066 | 16.640 | -205.430 |
| syn-C2+CHOOH | -81.091 | 51.899 | -180.447 |
| anti-C2+ CHOOH | -59.583 | 27.113 | -201.992 |
| (CH3)2COO+ CHOOH | -62.284 | 33.283 | -175.839 |
| CH2OO+CH3COOH | -47.152 | 16.152 | -206.577 |
| CH2OO+C2H4O4 | -36.120 | 19.291 | -178.809 |
| SCI species | Organic acids | Reaction rate coefficient(cm3 s-1) | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Theoretical | |||
| CH2OO | HCOOH | (1.1±0.1) × 10-10 | [18] | |
| CH2OO | HCOOH | (1.14±0.06) × 10-10 | [42] | |
| CH2OO | HCOOH | 1.87 × 10-10 | this study | |
| CH2OO | CH3COOH | (1.3±0.1) × 10-10 | [18] | |
| CH2OO | CH3COOH | (1.47±0.09) × 10-10 | [42] Error! Reference source not found. | |
| CH2OO | CH3COOH | (1.25±0.3) × 10-10 | [43] | |
| CH2OO | CH3COOH | (1.3±0.3) × 10-10 | [44] | |
| CH2OO | CH3COOH | 2.09× 10-10 | this study | |
| syn-CH3CHOO | HCOOH | (2.5±0.3) × 10-10 | [18] | |
| syn-CH3CHOO | CH3COOH | (1.7±0.5) × 10-10 | [18] | |
| syn-CH3CHOO | HCOOH | 1.59 × 10-10 | this study | |
| anti-CH3CHOO | HCOOH | (5±3) × 10-10 | [18] | |
| anti-CH3CHOO | CH3COOH | (2.5±0.6) × 10-10 | [18] | |
| anti-CH3CHOO | HCOOH | 5.30 × 10-10 | this study | |
| (CH3)2CHOO | HCOOH | (3.1±0.2) × 10-10 | [42] | |
| (CH3)2CHOO | CH3COOH | (3.1±0.2) × 10-10 | [42] | |
| (CH3)2CHOO | HCOOH | 1.26 × 10-10 | this study | |
| CH2OO | C2H4O4 | 7.16 × 10-10 | this study | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).