Submitted:
29 April 2025
Posted:
30 April 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
I. Introduction
II. Modeling and Simulations
A. Model
- Power Source: Contains a Three-Phase Programmable Voltage Source, which allows generate voltage waveforms with harmonic components and two Three-Phase Transformers 13.8kV/0.22kV, 60Hz which allows to configure parameters as rated power and frequency, windings rated voltages, resistances and inductances;
- Secondary Load: Contain an RC shunt load per phase, connected in “Y”. The values of resistor and capacitors are not determined in Ohms or Farads. Instead of that, the block used allow to choose rated voltage and Frequency, Active Power, and Capacitive Reactive Power, which was adjusted to reach power factor around 0.97. Without using capacitors, the power factor was around 0.71. The resistances consumption is 1kW per phase. This part is duplicated;
- Primary Load: Contain an RC shunt load per phase, connected in “Y”. The VAr compensation is twice the compensation on Secondary and the resistive load has the same power consumption of RC load on Secondary;
- AC-DC-AC Converter: This group represents a PWM Inverter which contains a Diode-based rectifier, DC Filter, IGBT DC-AC Inverter and a PWM Generator. There is a Three-Phase Induction Motor connected to the output of the inverter. This block is duplicated;
- Induction Motor: The model represents the three- phase induction motor parametrized with squirrel cage rotor type, 3HP, 220V and 60Hz. This block is duplicated;
- Current Measurement: The phase “A” current -Ia was measured and it was possible to get the followings information: Waveform, harmonics from 2nd to 109th orders (magnitude, phase and percentage from fundamental wave), THD (Total Harmonic Distortion [1]) and RMS value, in Ampere (A);
- Power Measurement: This group provides data as Active Power, Reactive Power and Power Factor; A block was created on Simulink to calculate Power Factor - PF from Active Power - AP and Reactive Power - RP measured on phase A, accordingly to equation (1).
- Voltage Measurement: The phase A Voltage - Va is measured and it was possible to get the followings information: Waveform, harmonics from 2nd to 109th orders (magnitude, phase and percentage from fundamental wave), THD (Total Harmonic Distortion [1]) and RMS value, in Volt (V);
- Impedance Measurement: This block work together PowerGui block to provide analysis of magnitude and phase;
- Cable Modeling: By using pi-equivalent model, cable impacts were considered between loads and power source and between loads and transformer windings (Primary and Secondary).
B. Harmonics Application and Variation
- 5th: This is the most significate distortion measured on the grid [2];
- 23rd: It corresponds to the resonance frequency on Secondary when capacitor bank was connected to the system;
- 103rd: This frequency was chosen because it is within Supraharmonics range (2kHz – 150kHz) [6] and is close to the first resonance on Primary, as will be shown ahead.
- Balanced power supply with capacitor bank connected on Secondary;
- Balanced power supply with capacitor bank not connected on Secondary;
- Unbalanced power supply with capacitor bank connected on Secondary;
- Unbalanced power supply with capacitor bank not connected on Secondary.
C. Simulation Methods
III. Results
A. Impedance Analysis
B. Harmonic Analysis Without Applying Distortions
C. Application of Voltage Distortions of 5th Order
- Crossed-frequency until the 33rd harmonic, but the distortions were lower than the reference;
- Zero-sequence harmonics appeared when the system was unbalanced;
- The resonances presented on the system did not cause any relevant amplification or attenuation around to the 5th order.
D. Application of Voltage Distortions of 23rd Order
- Crossed-frequency distortion between 17th and 37th order;
- 25th order showed its distortion higher than the 23rd order;
- The resonance on Secondary caused a strong amplification near its frequency;
- 23rd and 25th order had their distortions higher than 6% while 1% was applied;
- Unbalancing did not show to have any relevant impact on distortions.
E. Application of Voltage Distortions of 49th Order
- No relevant crossed-frequency was notable within the balanced system;
- Crossed-frequency happened around 23rd order when the system was unbalanced;
- Comparing results with and without capacitors to Figure 5, a relationship between harmonics distortion and impedance can be noted: after the resonance – 23rd order – as lower the impedance is, more it attenuates the distortion and crossed- frequency;
- Unbalancing caused significative distortion only on harmonics 27 and 33, which are zero- sequence.
F. Application of Voltage Distortions of 103rd Order
- Crossed-frequency happens near the resonance frequency;
- There is crossed-frequency around 103rd order, but it only happens where there are no capacitors on Secondary;
- The crossed-frequency happens due to the resonance on Primary;
- Voltage harmonics attenuate strongly after the resonance frequency when capacitors are connected on Secondary;
- There is amplification around 103rd order when applying 1% on 103rd order, which caused voltage distortions of 16%;
- The amplification is caused by the resonance on Primary;
- The unbalancing caused some distortion only on harmonics 27 and 33, which are zero-sequence.
IV. Conclusions
- Amplifications and attenuations of harmonic distortions due to resonances are evident;
- Background voltage distortion and voltage unbalance have a measurable impact on the magnitude of both self-frequency and cross-frequency harmonics.
References
- Dugan, R.C.; McGranaghan, M.F.; Santose, S.; Beaty, H.W. Electrial Power Systems Quality, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Y. K. Mok, C. F. T. Norman, W. H. Lau and M. C. Leung, "Experiment-based simulation for distortion behavior in LV networks for microgrid modeling," 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Detroit, MI, USA, 2011, pp. 1-6. [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, W.B.; Prata, C.d.S. In Portuguese: Study of Frequency Inverter Harmonics Generation; National Institute of Telecommunication - INATEL, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- IEEE, "IEEE Std 519™-2022 – IEEE Standard for Harmonic Control in Electric Power Systems". Available online: https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/519/10677/.
- Sheth, K., Patel, D., & Swami, G. (2024). Strategic insights into vehicles fuel consumption patterns: Innovative approaches for predictive modeling and efficiency forecasting. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 13(6), 1-10.
- Bollen, M.; Rönnberg, S. Propagation of Supraharmonics in the Low Voltage Grid; Energiforsk: Stockholm, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Cigre/Cired. Power Quality and EMC Issues With Future Electricity Networks, C4.24 ed.; 2018; pp. 109–113. [Google Scholar]
- Abdelaziz, A.Y.; Mekhamer, S.F.; Ismae, S.M. Sources and Mitigation of Harmonics in Industrial Electrical Power Systems: State of the Art. The Online Journal on Power and Energy Engineering (OJPEE) 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Swami, G., Sheth, K., & Patel, D. (2024). From ground to grid: The environmental footprint of minerals in renewable energy supply chains. Journal of Sustainable Energy, 12(4), 1-15. [CrossRef]
- Bollen, M.; Meyer, J.; Amaris, H.; Blanco, A.M.; de Castro, A.G.; Desmet, J.; Klatt, M.; Kocewiak, Ł.; Rönnberg, S.; Yang, K. Future Work on Harmonics – Some Expert Opinions Part II – Supraharmonics, Standards and Measurements; Stockholm.
- Fauri, M.; Ribeiro, P.F. A Novel Approach to Non Linear Load Modelling. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICHIPS VI, Bologna, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- M.Fauri, "Harmonic Modelling of Non-Linear Load by means of Crossed Frequency Admittance Matrix," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 12, no. 4, 1997. [CrossRef]
- Souto, O.C.N.; Oliveira, J.C.; Oliveira, A. Ribeiro, P.F. A Reflection on the Subject of Conveters Internal Harmonic Impedance. In Proceedings of the IMACS, Saint Nazaire, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Li, T. Wang, S. Zhou, and G. Zhao, “Coupled harmonic admittance identification based on measurement,” in 8th International Conference on Power and Energy Systems, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Dec. 2018. [CrossRef]
- Swami, G., Sheth, K., & Patel, D. (2024). PV capacity evaluation using ASTM E2848: Techniques for accuracy and reliability in bifacial systems. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 146(1), 1-10. [CrossRef]
- Sheth, K., Patel, D., & Swami, G. (2024). Reducing electrical consumption in stationary long- haul trucks. Open Journal of Energy Efficiency, 13(3), 1-10. [CrossRef]
- Y. K. Mok, C. F. T. Norman, W. H. Lau and M. Leung, "Experiment-based simulation for distortion behavior in LV networks for microgrid modeling," 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Detroit, MI, USA, 2011, pp. 1-6. [CrossRef]
- C. Debruyne, J. Desmet and L. Vandevelde, "Estimation of end user voltage quality including background distortion," 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, 2012, pp. 1-7. [CrossRef]
- Sheth, K., & Patel, D. (2024). Strategic placement of charging stations for enhanced electric vehicle adoption in San Diego, California. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 14(1), 1-10. [CrossRef]










Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).