Submitted:
24 April 2025
Posted:
24 April 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Synthesis of NHGs
2.2. DLS Analysis
2.3. Concentration and Zeta Potential (ζ by NTA
2.4. Mucus Penetration Assay for NHGs Monitored by NTA
2.5. Loading of VRC
2.6. In Vitro Release of VRC
2.7. Cell Culture
2.8. Cytotoxicity
2.9. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Physico-Chemical Characterization of NHGs and VRC-NHGs
3.2. Mucus Penetration Assay of NHGs Monitored by NTA
3.3. VRC Loading into NHGs
3.4. In Vitro Drug Release Study of VRC-NHGs
3.5. Cytotoxicity Studies of NHGs and VRC-NHGs
3.6. Antifungal Effect of VRC-NHGs
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
Conflicts of Interest
References
- A. Warris, A. Bercusson, D. Armstrong-James, Aspergillus colonization and antifungal immunity in cystic fibrosis patients, Med. Mycol. 57 (2019) S118–S126. [CrossRef]
- C.M. Farinha, I. Callebaut, Molecular mechanisms of cystic fibrosis—how mutations lead to misfunction and guide therapy, Biosci. Rep. (2022). [CrossRef]
- N.L. Turcios, Cystic fibrosis lung disease: An overview, Respir. Care (2020). [CrossRef]
- J.S. Suk, S.K. Lai, Y.Y. Wang, L.M. Ensign, P.L. Zeitlin, M.P. Boyle, J. Hanes, The penetration of fresh undiluted sputum expectorated by cystic fibrosis patients by non-adhesive polymer nanoparticles, Biomaterials (2009). [CrossRef]
- T. Yu, J. Chisholm, W.J. Choi, A. Anonuevo, S. Pulicare, W. Zhong, M. Chen, C. Fridley, S.K. Lai, L.M. Ensign, J.S. Suk, J. Hanes, Mucus-Penetrating Nanosuspensions for Enhanced Delivery of Poorly Soluble Drugs to Mucosal Surfaces, Adv. Healthc. Mater. (2016). [CrossRef]
- G.C. Hansson, Mucus and mucins in diseases of the intestinal and respiratory tracts, J. Intern. Med. (2019). [CrossRef]
- J. V. Fahy, B.F. Dickey, Airway Mucus Function and Dysfunction, N. Engl. J. Med. (2010). [CrossRef]
- O.W. Meldrum, S.H. Chotirmall, Mucus, microbiomes and pulmonary disease, Biomedicines (2021). [CrossRef]
- R.A. Cone, Barrier properties of mucus, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. (2009). [CrossRef]
- J.P. Pearson, P.I. Chater, M.D. Wilcox, The properties of the mucus barrier, a unique gel—how can nanoparticles cross it?, Ther. Deliv. (2016). [CrossRef]
- X. Murgia, B. Loretz, O. Hartwig, M. Hittinger, C.M. Lehr, The role of mucus on drug transport and its potential to affect therapeutic outcomes, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. (2018). [CrossRef]
- H.H. Sigurdsson, J. Kirch, C.M. Lehr, Mucus as a barrier to lipophilic drugs, Int. J. Pharm. (2013). [CrossRef]
- M. Boegh, H.M. Nielsen, Mucus as a barrier to drug delivery—Understanding and mimicking the barrier properties, Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. (2015). [CrossRef]
- J. King, S.F. Brunel, A. Warris, Aspergillus infections in cystic fibrosis, J. Infect. (2016). [CrossRef]
- S.H. Chotirmall, N.G. McElvaney, Fungi in the cystic fibrosis lung: Bystanders or pathogens?, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. (2014). [CrossRef]
- M.T. Martín-Gómez, Taking a look on fungi in cystic fibrosis: More questions than answers, Rev. Iberoam. Micol. (2020). [CrossRef]
- M.T. Montagna, G. Barbuti, F. Paglionico, G. Lovero, R. Iatta, O. De Giglio, T. Cuna, C. Coretti, T. Santostasi, A. Polizzi, A. Manca, G. Caggiano, J.P. Bouchara, Retrospective analysis of microorganisms isolated from cystic fibrosis patients in Southern Italy, 2002-2010, J. Prev. Med. Hyg. (2011). [CrossRef]
- C. Viñado, R.M. Girón, E. Ibáñez, A. García-Ortega, I. Pérez, D. Polanco, J. Pemán, A. Solé, Filamentous fungi in the airway of patients with cystic fibrosis: Just spectators?, Rev. Iberoam. Micol. (2021). [CrossRef]
- D. Seidel, A. Meißner, M. Lackner, E. Piepenbrock, J. Salmanton-García, M. Stecher, S. Mellinghoff, A. Hamprecht, L. Durán Graeff, P. Köhler, M.P. Cheng, J. Denis, I. Chedotal, J. Chander, D.L. Pakstis, I. Los-Arcos, M. Slavin, M.T. Montagna, G. Caggiano, M. Mares, J. Trauth, U. Aurbach, M.J.G.T. Vehreschild, J.J. Vehreschild, R.F. Duarte, R. Herbrecht, H. Wisplinghoff, O.A. Cornely, Prognostic factors in 264 adults with invasive Scedosporium spp. and Lomentospora prolificans infection reported in the literature and FungiScope®, Crit. Rev. Microbiol. (2019). [CrossRef]
- M. Pihet, J. Carrere, B. Cimon, D. Chabasse, L. Delhaes, F. Symoens, J.P. Bouchara, Occurrence and relevance of filamentous fungi in respiratory secretions of patients with cystic fibrosis—A review, in: Med. Mycol., 2009. [CrossRef]
- B. Cimon, J. Carrère, J.F. Vinatier, J.P. Chazalette, D. Chabasse, J.P. Bouchara, Clinical significance of Scedosporium apiospermum in patients with cystic fibrosis, Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. (2000). [CrossRef]
- Ö. Güngör, Z. Tamay, N. Güler, Z. Erturan, Frequency of fungi in respiratory samples from Turkish cystic fibrosis patients, Mycoses (2013). [CrossRef]
- S. Ziesing, S. Suerbaum, L. Sedlacek, Fungal epidemiology and diversity in cystic fibrosis patients over a 5-year period in a national reference center, Med. Mycol. (2016). [CrossRef]
- P. Lakhani, A. Patil, S. Majumdar, Challenges in the Polyene- and Azole-Based Pharmacotherapy of Ocular Fungal Infections, J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. (2019). [CrossRef]
- F. Wan, S.S.R. Bohr, S.N. Kłodzińska, H. Jumaa, Z. Huang, T. Nylander, M.B. Thygesen, K.K. Sørensen, K.J. Jensen, C. Sternberg, N. Hatzakis, H. Mørck Nielsen, Ultrasmall TPGS-PLGA Hybrid Nanoparticles for Site-Specific Delivery of Antibiotics into Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms in Lungs, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2020). [CrossRef]
- J.S. Suk, A.J. Kim, K. Trehan, C.S. Schneider, L. Cebotaru, O.M. Woodward, N.J. Boylan, M.P. Boyle, S.K. Lai, W.B. Guggino, J. Hanes, Lung gene therapy with highly compacted DNA nanoparticles that overcome the mucus barrier, J. Control. Release (2014). [CrossRef]
- D.P. Pacheco, C.S. Butnarasu, F. Briatico Vangosa, L. Pastorino, L. Visai, S. Visentin, P. Petrini, Disassembling the complexity of mucus barriers to develop a fast screening tool for early drug discovery, J. Mater. Chem. B (2019). [CrossRef]
- S.D. Cemal, G. Kazimirsky, Y. Shadkchan, L. Eswaran, R. Abramovitch, N. Abudi, M.L. Cuestas, N. Osherov, G. Byk, Biocompatible Narrow Size Nanohydrogels for Drug Delivery, Nanomedicine: NBM (2025), in press. [CrossRef]
- H. Yang, Q. Wang, W. Chen, Y. Zhao, T. Yong, L. Gan, H. Xu, X. Yang, Hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity reversable and redox-sensitive nanogels for anticancer drug delivery, Mol. Pharm. (2015). [CrossRef]
- S. Palakkal, D. Logviniuk, G. Byk, Tuning the size and hydrophobicity of nanohydrogels exploiting a self-assembly assisted polymerization mechanism for controlled drug delivery, J. Nanoparticle Res. (2020). [CrossRef]
- F. Shi, J. Ding, C. Xiao, X. Zhuang, C. He, L. Chen, X. Chen, Intracellular microenvironment responsive PEGylated polypeptide nanogels with ionizable cores for efficient doxorubicin loading and triggered release, J. Mater. Chem. (2012). [CrossRef]
- V. Gupta, F. Ahsan, Influence of PEI as a core modifying agent on PLGA microspheres of PGE 1, a pulmonary selective vasodilator, Int. J. Pharm. (2011). [CrossRef]
- G. Costabile, I. D’Angelo, G. Rampioni, R. Bondì, B. Pompili, F. Ascenzioni, E. Mitidieri, R. D’Emmanuele Di Villa Bianca, R. Sorrentino, A. Miro, F. Quaglia, F. Imperi, L. Leoni, F. Ungaro, Toward Repositioning Niclosamide for Antivirulence Therapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lung Infections: Development of Inhalable Formulations through Nanosuspension Technology, Mol. Pharm. (2015). [CrossRef]
- D.S. Pellosi, I. d’Angelo, S. Maiolino, E. Mitidieri, R. d’Emmanuele di Villa Bianca, R. Sorrentino, F. Quaglia, F. Ungaro, In vitro/in vivo investigation on the potential of Pluronic® mixed micelles for pulmonary drug delivery, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. (2018). [CrossRef]
- N. Gulati, R. Rastogi, A.K. Dinda, R. Saxena, V. Koul, Characterization and cell material interactions of PEGylated PNIPAAM nanoparticles, Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces (2010). [CrossRef]
- Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI), Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi, 3rd ed. CLSI standard M38, Wayne, PA Clin. Lab. Stand. Inst. (2017).
- R. Khandadash, V. Machtey, I. Shainer, H.E. Gottlieb, Y. Gothilf, Y. Ebenstein, A. Weiss, G. Byk, Novel biocompatible hydrogel nanoparticles: generation and size-tuning of nanoparticles by the formation of micelle templates obtained from thermo-responsive monomers mixtures, J. Nanoparticle Res. (2014). [CrossRef]
- L. Eswaran, G. Kazimirsky, G. Byk, New Biocompatible Nanohydrogels of Predefined Sizes for Complexing Nucleic Acids, Pharmaceutics (2023). [CrossRef]
- S.C. Yang, S.Y.R. Paik, J. Ryu, K.O. Choi, T.S. Kang, J.K. Lee, C.W. Song, S. Ko, Dynamic light scattering-based method to determine primary particle size of iron oxide nanoparticles in simulated gastrointestinal fluid, Food Chem. (2014). [CrossRef]
- F.H. Yang, Q. Zhang, Q.Y. Liang, S.Q. Wang, B.X. Zhao, Y.T. Wang, Y. Cai, G.F. Li, Bioavailability enhancement of paclitaxel via a novel oral drug delivery system: Paclitaxel-loaded glycyrrhizic acid micelles, Molecules (2015). [CrossRef]
- L.M. Ensign, C. Schneider, J.S. Suk, R. Cone, J. Hanes, Mucus penetrating nanoparticles: Biophysical tool and method of drug and gene delivery, Adv. Mater. (2012). [CrossRef]
- L. Li, H. Wang, J. Ye, Y. Chen, R. Wang, D. Jin, Y. Liu, Mechanism Study on Nanoparticle Negative Surface Charge Modification by Ascorbyl Palmitate and Its Improvement of Tumor Targeting Ability, Molecules (2022). [CrossRef]
- M. Gumustas, C.T. Sengel-Turk, A. Gumustas, S.A. Ozkan, B. Uslu, Effect of Polymer-Based Nanoparticles on the Assay of Antimicrobial Drug Delivery Systems, in: Multifunct. Syst. Comb. Deliv. Biosensing Diagnostics, 2017. [CrossRef]
- Y. Cu, W.M. Saltzman, Controlled surface modification with poly(ethylene)glycol enhances diffusion of PLGA nanoparticles in human cervical Mucus, Mol. Pharm. (2009). [CrossRef]
- X. Murgia, P. Pawelzyk, U.F. Schaefer, C. Wagner, N. Willenbacher, C.M. Lehr, Size-Limited Penetration of Nanoparticles into Porcine Respiratory Mucus after Aerosol Deposition, Biomacromolecules (2016). [CrossRef]
- S. Shen, Y. Wu, Y. Liu, D. Wu, High drug-loading nanomedicines: Progress, current status, and prospects, Int. J. Nanomedicine (2017). [CrossRef]
- S.A. Abouelmagd, B. Sun, A.C. Chang, Y.J. Ku, Y. Yeo, Release kinetics study of poorly water-soluble drugs from nanoparticles: Are we doing it right?, Mol. Pharm. (2015). [CrossRef]
- J.S. Patil, S. Sarasija, Pulmonary drug delivery strategies: A concise, systematic review, Lung India (2012). [CrossRef]
- I. INTERNATIONAL STANDARD, ISO 10993-5:2009—Biological evaluation of medical devices- Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity, Int. Organ. Stand. Geneva, Switz. (2009).




| # | (Acr)1.1Jeffamine1900 | NIPAM | EDDA | NTEDTA |
| E1 | 130 | 120 | 15 | - |
| E2 | 260 | 120 | 15 | - |
| E3 | 320 | 120 | 15 | - |
| E4 | 200 | 188 | - | 19 |
| E5 | 300 | 188 | - | 19 |
| E6 | 400 | 188 | - | 19 |
| # | NHGs | VRC-NHGs | ||||||
| Dh [nm] | PDI | Ζ [mV] | NPs/mL | Dh [nm] | PDI | Ζ [mV] | NPs/mL | |
| E1 | 410±4 | 0.17 | -27.9 | 5.7E+12 | 424±2 | 0.12 | -21.7 | 1.4E+12 |
| E2 | 242±8 | 0.28 | -28.8 | 7.4E+12 | 251±6 | 0.19 | -9.2 | 4.8E+12 |
| E3 | 136±5 | 0.17 | -23.3 | 3.7E+12 | 145±5 | 0.22 | -27.5 | 5.2E+12 |
| E4 | 392±2 | 0.08 | -27.1 | 1.3E+12 | 407±4 | 0.14 | -26.7 | 1.6E+12 |
| E5 | 198±6 | 0.15 | -27.3 | 2.4E+12 | 220±5 | 0.23 | -23.5 | 6.7E+12 |
| E6 | 121±7 | 0.24 | -11.9 | 6.4E+12 | 134±3 | 0.19 | -20.0 | 5.6E+12 |
| % Particles trespassing mucus barrier | ||||||
| Time [h] | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | E5 | E6 |
| 4 | 7.2 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 0.3 |
| 24 | 20.1 | 15.1 | 12 | 7.8 | 2.8 | 0.4 |
| # | Loaded VRC [µg] | #DLE [%] | *DLC [%] |
| E1 | 325±8 | 16.2 | 3.2 |
| E2 | 276±9 | 13.8 | 2.8 |
| E3 | 208±5 | 10.4 | 2.1 |
| E4 | 312±10 | 15.6 | 3.1 |
| E5 | 245±7 | 12.2 | 2.4 |
| E6 | 198±6 | 9.9 | 2.0 |
|
Fungal species |
VRC-DMSO | VRC Susp. | VRC- E1 | VRC- E2 | VRC- E3 | VRC- E4 | VRC- E5 | VRC- E6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. fumigatus | 0.25 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 |
| *A. fumigatus | 0.25 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 |
| A. terreus | 1 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 |
| A. flavus | 0.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 |
| A. niger | 0.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 |
| A. nidulans | 0.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.25 | 1 | 2 |
| E. dermatitidis | 0.5 | 2 | 0.25 | 1 | 1 | 0.25 | 1 | 2 |
| S. auarantiacum | 0.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).