Submitted:
19 April 2025
Posted:
21 April 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Study Area

3.2. Data Collection and Analysis Methods
4. Results
- Areej Park:
- Nada Park:

- Sadeem Park:
- Ajyal Park-1
- Raka Square Park
- Ash Shulah Park


5. Discussion


6. Conclusions
- User-Centered Park Design: There is a need for future research focused on how different demographics interact with the parks. Further studies could explore tailored design solutions that cater specifically to the targeted focus groups for increasing park utilization.
- Social and Psychological Barriers: The psychological factors affecting park use warrant deeper investigation. Future studies could explore how privacy concerns or perceived safety influence the decision to use public parks and suggest ways to mitigate these concerns through design.
- Long-Term Sustainability: Research could focus on the long-term impact of park upgrades, particularly in terms of social sustainability. How do improvements in the recreational park facilities (such as safety, seating, and toilets) influence the long-term social cohesion of a neighborhood?
- Diverse Age Groups and Cultural Sensitivity: The research could be expanded to examine the preferences of non-Saudis and other age groups in relation to park use. It might be useful to understand cultural differences in recreational habits and park accessibility preferences.
- Urban Planning and Policy: Future studies could explore the role of urban planning in promoting equitable access to recreational parks, ensuring that improvements reach diverse neighborhood groups, and how policymakers can integrate these findings into future development projects.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Unger, D. G. , &Wandersman, A. (1985). The importance of neighbors: The social, cognitive, and affective compo-nents of neighboring. American journal of community psychology, 13, 139-169.
- Dave, S. Neighbourhood density and social sustainability in cities of developing countries. Sustain. Dev. 2011, 19, 189–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doda, Z. (2005).
- Abbaszadeh, S. (2009). Reinforcing Social Interaction Among Persian Neighborhood Communities in New High-Rise Residential Development Shahab Abbaszadeh.
- Kara, E. (2022). The effects of environmental factors on social interaction in outdoor spaces. The multiple case of children's villages.
- Hertzberger, H. (2010). Space and the Architect: Lessons in Architecture 2.
- Farshidi, A. (2016). Impact of design on social interaction within urban residential developments in Scotland (Doc-toral dissertation).
- Azzam, A. (2017). Socially sustainable neighborhoods: Special reference to the Egyptian context.
- Nasser, G. M. , & Alghamdi, M. (2022). SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT OF RI-YADH CITY (CASE STUDY: AL-WAHA RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD). Emirates Journal for Engineering Research.
- Karban, A. (2014). Developing a framework for neighborhood-level urban sustainability assessment in Saudi Arabia. The University of Texas at San Antonio.
- Shirazi, M. R. , &Keivani, R. (2019). The triad of social sustainability: Defining and measuring social sustaina-bility of urban neighbourhoods. Urban Research & Practice, 12(4), 448-471.
- Ahmed, K.G. Urban social sustainability: a study of the Emirati local communities in Al Ain. J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain. 2012, 5, 41–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talen, E. Sense of Community and Neighbourhood Form: An Assessment of the Social Doctrine of New Urbanism. Urban Stud. 1999, 36, 1361–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buonfino, A. , & Hilder, P. (2006). Neighbouring in contemporary Britain. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
- Dempsey, N. (2006). The Influence of the quality of the built environment on social cohesion in English neighbourhoods (Doctoral dissertation, Oxford Brookes University).
- Lindsay, M. (2010). The impact of design on privacy and social interaction between neighbours in sustainable housing developments in England and Wales (Doctoral dissertation, Oxford Brookes University).
- Mamaghani, N. K. , Asadollahi, A. P., &Mortezaei, S. R. (2015). Designing for improving social relationship with interaction design approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201, 377-385.
- Kaźmierczak, A. The contribution of local parks to neighbourhood social ties. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 109, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salih, S.A.; Ismail, S. DETERMINING THE FACTORS AFFECTING SOCIAL INTERACTION IN THE PARKS OF BAGHDAD CITY, IRAQ. Int. J. Arch. Res. Archnet-IJAR 2018, 12, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- RahraviPoodeh, S. , &Pouriaye Vali, A. H. (2014). Investigating the characteristics of open spaces to enhance social interactions in neighborhood environments. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences: Proceedings, 3(4 (s)), pp-148.
- Fleming, R. , Baum, A., & Singer, J. E. (1985). Social support and the physical environment.
- Jacobs, J. (1961). Jane jacobs. The Death and Life of Great American Cities, 21(1), 13-25.
- Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces.
- Gökçe, Ş. (2007). Sosyaletkileşimigeliştirecekpeyzajtasarımıüzerinebiraraştırma: ÇukurambarMahallesiörneği (Master's thesis, Ankara Universitesi (Turkey)).
- Farida, N. Effects of outdoor shared spaces on social interaction in a housing estate in Algeria. Front. Arch. Res. 2013, 2, 457–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Speranza, P. , Keisler, R. , & Mai, V. (2015). Social interaction and cohesion tool: a dynamic design approach for Bar-celona’ssuperilles. In Proceeding of the 35th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (pp. 468-481). [Google Scholar]
- Ewing, R.; Handy, S. Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability. J. Urban Des. 2009, 14, 65–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maniruzzaman, K. M. , Alqahtany, A., Abou-Korin, A., & Al-Shihri, F. S. (2021). An analysis of residents’ satis-faction with attributes of urban parks in Dammam city, Saudi Arabia. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(3), 3365-3374.
- Nicholls, S. (2001). Measuring the accessibility and equity of public parks: A case study using GIS. Managing lei-sure, 6(4), 201-219.
- Loukaitou-Sideris, A. , & Sideris, A. (2009). What brings children to the park? Analysis and measurement of the var-iables affecting children's use of parks. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(1), 89-107.
- McCormack, G. R. , Rock, M., Toohey, A. M., &Hignell, D. (2010). Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health & place, 16(4), 712-726.
- Parra, D.C.; Gomez, L.F.; Fleischer, N.L.; Pinzon, J.D. Built environment characteristics and perceived active park use among older adults: Results from a multilevel study in Bogotá. Heal. Place 2010, 16, 1174–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalvi, M.Q.; Martin, K.M. The measurement of accessibility: Some preliminary results. Transportation 1976, 5, 17–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 25(2), 73-76.
- Weibull, J. W. (1976). An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility. Regional science and urban eco-nomics, 6(4), 357-379.
- Raine, P. , Truman, C., &Southerst, A. (2002). The development of a community gym for people with mental health problems: Influences on psychological accessibility. Journal of Mental Health, 11(1), 43-53.
- Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predictiing social behavior. Englewood cliffs.
- Dill, J.; Mohr, C.; Ma, L. How Can Psychological Theory Help Cities Increase Walking and Bicycling? J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2014, 80, 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Vlugt, A. L. , Curl, A., &Wittowsky, D. (2019). What about the people? Developing measures of perceived accessibility from case studies in Germany and the UK. Applied Mobilities.
- Akpinar, A. How is quality of urban green spaces associated with physical activity and health? Urban For. Urban Green. 2016, 16, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mowen, A. J. , & Confer, J. J. (2003). The Relationship Between Perceptions, Distance, and Socio-Demographic Char-acteristics Upon Public Use of an Urban “In-Fill”. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 21(3).
- Ries, A.V.; Voorhees, C.C.; Roche, K.M.; Gittelsohn, J.; Yan, A.F.; Astone, N.M. A Quantitative Examination of Park Characteristics Related to Park Use and Physical Activity Among Urban Youth. J. Adolesc. Heal. 2009, 45, S64–S70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borumand, M. A. R. Y. A. M. , & Rezaee, S. O. L. M. A. Z. (2014). Evaluating the performance of the parks of women in promoting the gender equality in cities case study: Madar Park of Women in Tehran 15th municipal district. Indian J Scientific Res, 4, 280-290.
- Leslie, E.; Cerin, E.; Kremer, P. Perceived Neighborhood Environment and Park Use as Mediators of the Effect of Area Socio-Economic Status on Walking Behaviors. J. Phys. Act. Heal. 2010, 7, 802–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wendel, H.E.W.; Zarger, R.K.; Mihelcic, J.R. Accessibility and usability: Green space preferences, perceptions, and barriers in a rapidly urbanizing city in Latin America. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 107, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brorsson, A.; Öhman, A.; Lundberg, S.; Nygård, L. Accessibility in public space as perceived by people with Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia 2011, 10, 587–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kemperman, A.D.A.M.; Timmermans, H.J.P. Preferences, benefits, and park visits: A latent class segmentation analysis. Tour. Anal. 2006, 11, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- zgüner, H. (2011). Cultural differences in attitudes towards urban parks and green spaces. Landscape Research, 36(5), 599-620.
- Koohsari, M. J. , Karakiewicz, J. A., & Kaczynski, A. T. (2013). Public open space and walking: the role of proximity, perceptual qualities of the surrounding built environment, and street configuration. Environment and Behavior, 45(6), 706-736.
- Westley, T. , Kaczynski, A. T., Stanis, S. A. W., & Besenyi, G. M. (2013). Parental neighborhood safety perceptions and their children's health behaviors: Associations by child age, gender and household income. Children, Youth and Environments, 23(3), 118-147.
- Park, K. Psychological park accessibility: a systematic literature review of perceptual components affecting park use. Landsc. Res. 2016, 42, 508–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiesura, A. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2004, 68, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maas, J.; Verheij, R.A.; de Vries, S.; Spreeuwenberg, P.; Schellevis, F.G.; Groenewegen, P.P. Morbidity is related to a green living environment. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2009, 63, 967–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borumand, M. A. R. Y. A. M. , & Rezaee, S. O. L. M. A. Z. (2014). Evaluating the performance of the parks of women in promoting the gender equality in cities case study: Madar Park of Women in Tehran 15th municipal district. Indian J Scientific Res, 4, 280-290.
- Krenichyn, K. (2006). ‘The only place to go and be in the city’: women talk about exercise, being outdoors, and the meanings of a large urban park. Health & place, 12(4), 631-643.
- Wendel, H.E.W.; Zarger, R.K.; Mihelcic, J.R. Accessibility and usability: Green space preferences, perceptions, and barriers in a rapidly urbanizing city in Latin America. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 107, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, D. A. , Han, B., Derose, K. P., Williamson, S., Marsh, T., Raaen, L., & McKenzie, T. L. (2016). The paradox of parks in low-income areas: Park use and perceived threats. Environment and behavior, 48(1), 230-245.
- Alqahtany, A. Developing a consensus-based measures for housing delivery in Dammam Metropolitan Area, Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Hous. Mark. Anal. 2019, 12, 226–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abou-Korin, A.A. and Shihri, F.S. (2015), “Rapid urbanization and sustainability in Saudi Arabia: the case of Dammam metropolitan area”, Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 8 No. 9, p.
- Alhowaish, A.K. Eighty years of urban growth and socioeconomic trends in Dammam Metropolitan Area, Saudi Arabia. Habitat Int. 2015, 50, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alobaidallah, A. M. , Alqahtany, A., &Maniruzzaman, K. M. (2025). Assessment of the Saher System in En-hancing Traffic Control and Road Safety: Insights from Experts for Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 17(8), 3304.
- Abou-Korin, A. A. (2011, December). Impacts of rapid urbanisation in the Arab World: The case of Dammam met-ropolitan area, Saudi Arabia. In 5th Int’l Conference and Workshop on Built Environment in Developing Countries (ICBEDC 2011) (pp. 1-25). Pulao Pinang, Malaysia: University Sains Malaysia.
- Alhowaish, A.K. Eighty years of urban growth and socioeconomic trends in Dammam Metropolitan Area, Saudi Arabia. Habitat Int. 2015, 50, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dano, U.L.; Abubakar, I.R.; AlShihri, F.S.; Ahmed, S.M.; Alrawaf, T.I.; Alshammari, M.S. A multi-criteria assessment of climate change impacts on urban sustainability in Dammam Metropolitan Area, Saudi Arabia. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2022, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AlQahtany, A. Evaluating the demographic scenario of gated communities in Dammam metropolitan area, kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Housing, Care Support 2021, 25, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saudi Vision 2030. (2020). Saudi Vision 2030. Retrieved from Saudi Vision 2030: https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/.
- Saudi Vision 2030. (2016). The Quality-of-Life Program. Retrieved from https://vision2030.gov.sa/en/programs/QoL.
- Gehl, J. , & Svarre, B. (2013). How to study public life (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: Island press.
- Alsumsam, I. (2017). Improving the quality of public open spaces in Hama, Syria: an investigation through the so-cial spatial approach (Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh).
- Goličnik, B. (2005). People in place: a configuration of physical form and the dynamic patterns of spatial occupancy in urban open public space.
- Alqahtany, A. (2020), “People’s perceptions of sustainable housing in developing countries: the case of riyadh, Saudi Arabia”, Housing, Care and Support, Vol. 23 No.
- Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Strategies: Social Research Methods. https://books.google.co.
- Creswell, J. W. , & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
- Camacho Olmedo, M. T. , & García-Álvarez, D. (2022). Basic and multiple-resolution cross-tabulation to validate land use cover maps. In Land Use Cover Datasets and Validation Tools: Validation Practices with QGIS (pp. 99-125). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Lyu, J.; Pitt, M. Cross-tabulation Analysis of the Impact of University Students on IEQ Factors. J. Oper. Intell. 2025, 3, 74–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, L. G. (2008). Sustainable Urban Renewal Framework for a High Density City Hong Kong. (Doctoral disser-tation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 3364. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.














| Questions | Options | Percentage (5) |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 – Locality (Location they live) | Khobar | 50.20% |
| Dammam | 23.92% | |
| Dhahran | 12.55% | |
| None of the above | 13.33% | |
| Q2 - Nationality | Saudi | 72.55% |
| Non-Saudi | 27.45% | |
| Q3 - Gender | Male | 67.19% |
| Female | 32.81% | |
| Q4 – Age Group | Under 18 | 28.91% |
| 18-24 | 46.09% | |
| 25-34 | 10.55% | |
| 35-44 | 6.64% | |
| 45-54 | 5.47% | |
| Above 55 | 2.34% | |
| Q5 – Housing type | Owner | 28.63% |
| Renter | 25.10% | |
| Provided by employer or parents | 46.27% | |
| Q6 – Marital Status | Married | 74.60% |
| Single | 24.21% | |
| Divorced | 0.40% | |
| Widowed | 0.79% | |
| Q7 – Education Level | Not completed | 34.90% |
| High school/Diploma | 27.84% | |
| Bachelors | 28.24% | |
| Masters | 7.06% | |
| Doctorate | 1.96% | |
| Q8 – Employment | Not employed | 73.02% |
| Public sector | 7.14% | |
| Private sector | 17.46% | |
| Self employed | 1.19% | |
| Retired | 1.19% | |
| Q9 – Relatives in neighborhood | Yes | 51.97% |
| No | 48.03% |
| Anova: Single Factor | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUMMARY | ||||||
| Groups | Count | Sum | Average | Variance | ||
| Providing paths for walking and jogging | 214 | 755 | 3.528 | 1.781 | ||
| Providing safe play areas for children of all age groups | 213 | 748 | 3.512 | 1.732 | ||
| Providing sports facilities such as football and volleyball courts and others | 216 | 686 | 3.176 | 2.164 | ||
| Provide shade areas for seating and relaxing. | 218 | 694 | 3.183 | 2.021 | ||
| Providing toilets for both genders | 224 | 698 | 3.116 | 2.444 | ||
| Providing snack and beverage kiosks | 239 | 750 | 3.138 | 2.313 | ||
| Providing safety measures such as a perimeter fence around the recreational park, fire suppression systems and other safety tools. | 248 | 773 | 3.117 | 2.249 | ||
| Periodic maintenance of recreational parks such as mowing and maintaining green spaces | 247 | 806 | 3.263 | 2.065 | ||
| Adequate lighting during early morning or evening | 246 | 887 | 3.606 | 1.668 | ||
| Designing the seats in a way that encourages social interaction among the residents of the residential neighborhood, such as designing the seats in a circular shape. | 247 | 738 | 2.988 | 1.866 | ||
| Provide adequate parking space for visitors. | 245 | 840 | 3.429 | 1.852 | ||
| Easy access to all categories of society | 247 | 855 | 3.462 | 1.802 | ||
| Proximity of recreational park to your place of residence | 246 | 885 | 3.598 | 1.695 | ||
| Comprehensive range of activities available for all age groups and diverse backgrounds. | 246 | 806 | 3.276 | 1.891 | ||
| The recreational parks in residential neighborhood are well connected to other facilities and services such as shops and public transportation. | 245 | 826 | 3.371 | 1.775 | ||
| ANOVA | ||||||
| Source of Variation | Sum of Squares (SS) | Degree of Freedom (df) | Mean Square (MS) | F | P-value | F crit |
| Between Groups | 129.1 | 14 | 9.221 | 4.723 | 0.00 | 1.695 |
| Within Groups | 6884 | 3526 | 1.952 | |||
| Total | 7013 | 3540 |
| Highest Ranked Physical Factors | Lowest Ranked Physical Factors |
|---|---|
| 1.Adequate Lighting During Early Morning or Evening. | 1.Designing the seats in a way that encourages social interaction |
| 2.Proximity Of Recreational Park to Your Place of Residence | 2.Providing safety measures |
| 3.Providing paths for walking and jogging | 3.Providing toilets for both genders |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).