Submitted:
07 April 2025
Posted:
08 April 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Farm Selection Criteria
- Housing system: Exclusive use of fully indoor intensive housing, characterized by permanent confinement and feeding with complete mixed rations composed of commercial concentrates and locally produced forages (hay and/or ensilage).
- Flock size: A minimum of 500 reproductive females, reflecting the threshold for economically viable intensive dairy sheep production in Greece [1].
- Estrus synchronization protocols: Routine application of estrus synchronization involving the insertion of progestagen-impregnated intravaginal sponges for 12–14 days, followed by an intramuscular injection of 500 IU of eCG at sponge withdrawal [4].
- Ultrasonographic pregnancy diagnosis: Regular use of transabdominal ultrasonography 45–60 days post-mating as part of herd reproductive monitoring.
2.3. Data Collection
2.3.1. Reproductive History
- Annual milk production.
- Age group (hoggets or ewes) of each reproductive female.
- Dates of reproductive management events, including estrus synchronization procedures and ram introduction for natural mating.
2.3.2. Clinical Examination
2.3.3. Ultrasonographic Examination
- Visualization of anechoic or hypoechoic intrauterine fluid accumulation,
- Absence of embryonic or fetal structures,
- Presence of thin echogenic septations within the fluid, when present.
2.4. Data Management and Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Vaginal Prolapse
3.2. Hydrometra
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| PDO | Protected Designation of Origin |
| ES | estrus synchronization |
| eCG | equine chorionic gonadotropin |
References
- Papanikolopoulou, V.; Vouraki, S.; Priskas, S.; Theodoridis, A.; Dimitriou, S.; Arsenos, G. Economic Performance of Dairy Sheep Farms in Less-Favoured Areas of Greece: A Comparative Analysis Based on Flock Size and Farming System. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pulina, G.; Milán, M.J.; Lavín, M.P.; Theodoridis, A.; Morin, E.; Capote, J.; Thomas, D.L.; Francesconi, A.H.D.; Caja, G. Invited review: Current production trends, farm structures, and economics of the dairy sheep and goat sectors. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 101, 6715–6729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Voulgarakis, N.; Gougoulis, D.; Psalla, D.; Papakonstantinou, G.; Katsoulis, K.; Angelidou-Tsifida, M.; Athanasiou, L.; Papatsiros, V.; Christodoulopoulos, G. Subacute Rumen Acidosis in Greek Dairy Sheep: Prevalence, Impact, and Colorimetry Management. Animals 2024, 14, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lianou, D.T.; Vasileiou, N.G.C.; Michael, C.K.; Valasi, I.; Mavrogianni, V.S.; Caroprese, M.; Fthenakis, G.C. Patterns of Reproductive Management in Sheep and Goat Farms in Greece. Animals 2022, 12, 3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Christodoulopoulos, G. Vaginal prolapse in ewes: A critical review of the literature and the disease status in Greece. J. Hellenic Vet. Med. Soc. 2023, 74, 5499–5504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonzalez-Bulnes, A.; Pallares, P.; Vazquez, M.I. Ultrasonographic imaging in small ruminant reproduction. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2010, 45, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Almubarak, A.M.; Abass, N.A.; Badawi, M.E.; Ibrahim, M.T.; Elfadil, A.A.; Abdelghafar, R.M. Pseudopregnancy in goats: Sonographic prevalence and associated risk factors in Khartoum State, Sudan. Vet. World 2018, 11, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jackson, R.; Hilson, R.; Roe, A.; Perkins, N.; Heuer, C.; West, D. Epidemiology of vaginal prolapse in mixed-age ewes in New Zealand. NZVJ 2014, 62, 328–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Christodoulopoulos, G. Vaginal prolapse in ewes. Vet. Rec. Case Rep. 2022, 10, e375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dawood, K.E. Pathological abnormalities of the reproductive tracts of ewes in basra, iraq. The Vet. Rec. 2010, 166, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Palmieri, C.; Schiavi, E.D.; Della Salda, L. Congenital and acquired pathology of ovary and tubular genital organs in ewes: A review. Theriogenology 2011, 75, 393–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sharma, A.; Kumar, P.; Singh, M.; Vasishta, N.K. Reproductive health status of north western Himalayan Gaddi sheep: An abattoir study. Open Vet. J. 2014, 4, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Agarwal, J.; Vashistha, N.; Sharma, A.; Sharma, R.; Singh, M.; Kumar, P. Histopathological Study Of Naturally Occurring Pathological Conditions of Uterus Affecting Reproduction In Small Ruminants. IJVSBT 2015, 11, 19–22. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, R.M.; Macêdo, J.T.; Lacerda, M.D.; Azevedo, J.P.; Júnior, J.A.; Cerqueira, R.B.; Pedroso, P.M. Lesions of the sheep reproductive system found in a slaughterhouse in the state of Bahia, Brazil. Pesq. Vet. 2020, 40, 955–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balaro, M.F.A.; Cosentino, I.O.; Ribeiro, A.C.S.; Brandão, F.Z. Ultrasound Diagnosis in Small Ruminants: Occurrence and Description of Genital Pathologies. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Olivera-Muzante, J.; Gil, J.; Fierro, S.; Menchaca, A.; Rubianes, E. Alternatives to improve a prostaglandin-based protocol for timed artificial insemination in sheep. Theriogenology 2011, 76, 1501–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Viñoles, C.; Forsberg, M.; Banchero, G.; Rubianes, E. Effect of long-term and short-term progestagen treatment on follicular development and pregnancy rate in cyclic ewes. Theriogenology 2001, 55, 993–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yotov, S.; Atanasova, I.; Ganeva, D.; Antonov, A.; Vassilev, N. A clinical case of hydrometra in a ewe following estrus synchronization. Bulg. J. Vet. Med. 2009, 12, 67–72. [Google Scholar]
- Acritopoulou, S.; Haresign, W. Response of ewes to a single injection of an analogue of PGF-2 alpha given at different stages of the oestrous cycle. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1980, 58, 219–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Category | Hoggets (n, %) |
Vaginal Prolapse in Hoggets (n, %) |
Ewes (n, %) |
Vaginal Prolapse in Ewes (n, %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Pregnant Animals | 14,494 (100%) | 135 (0.93‡ᵃ) | 71,445 (100%) | 243 (0.34§ᵃ) |
| Pregnancy with Singleton | 3,154 (21.76%) | 5 (0.16‡ᵇ) | 14,245 (19.94%) | 24 (0.17§ᵇ) |
| Pregnancy with Twins | 6,275 (43.29%) | 69 (1.10‡ᶜ) | 31,740 (44.43%) | 105 (0.33§ᵃ) |
| Pregnancy with Triplets | 5,065 (34.95%) | 61 (1.20‡ᶜ) | 25,460 (35.64%) | 114 (0.45§ᶜ) |
| Category | 1st E.S. (n, %) | 2nd E.S. (n, %) | 3rd E.S. (n, %) | 4th E.S. (n, %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treated | 80,250 (100%) | 5,542 (100%) | 585 (100%) | 146 (100%) |
| Pregnant | 74,408 (92.72ᵃ) | 4,865 (87.78ᵇ) | 403 (68.89ᶜ) | 62 (42.47ᵈ) |
| Non-Pregnant † | 5,842 (7.28ᵃ) | 677 (12.22ᵇ) | 182 (31.11ᶜ) | 84 (57.53ᵈ) |
| Hydrometra Cases | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (0.51ᵃ) | 18 (12.33ᵇ) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).