Submitted:
01 April 2025
Posted:
02 April 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Research Methodology
4. Results and Findings
| Theme | Description |
|---|---|
| Trust in Partners | Building strong, reliable relationships between supply chain partners. |
| Transparent Communication | Open, honest, and timely exchange of information between organizations. |
| Confidence in Decision-Making | Trust enhances confidence in joint decision-making during crises. |
| Theme | Description |
|---|---|
| Ability to Adjust | The capacity to modify processes in response to supply chain disruptions. |
| Resource Sharing | Willingness to reallocate resources to support partners during crises. |
| Cross-Functional Collaboration | Different departments work together to adapt to challenges. |
| Theme | Description |
|---|---|
| Real-Time Data Access | Timely, accurate access to critical information across the supply chain. |
| Digital Platforms | Technology platforms enable secure and efficient sharing of information. |
| Data Security | Ensuring the confidentiality of shared data between partners. |
| Theme | Description |
|---|---|
| Transformational Leadership | Leaders who encourage innovation, flexibility, and collaboration. |
| Organizational Alignment | Ensuring that company values support collaboration and shared goals. |
| Leadership Commitment | Leaders’ dedication to fostering long-term relationships and resilience. |
| Theme | Description |
|---|---|
| Proactive Risk Identification | Early detection of potential risks to avoid larger disruptions. |
| Joint Contingency Plans | Collaborative efforts to create shared contingency plans for supply chain events. |
| Scenario Planning | Developing multiple scenarios to prepare for various disruption types. |
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
References
- Barratt, M. , & Oke, A. Antecedents of supply chain visibility in retail supply chains: A resource-based theory perspective. Journal of Operations Management 2007, 25, 1217–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baryannis, G. , Dani, S., & Antoniou, G. Predicting supply chain risks using machine learning: The trade-off between performance and interpretability. Future Generation Computer Systems 2019, 101, 993–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brandon-Jones, E. , Squire, B., Autry, C. W., & Petersen, K. J. A contingent resource-based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness. Journal of Supply Chain Management 2014, 50, 55–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, T. Y. , Rogers, D. S., & Vakil, B. (2020). Coronavirus is a wake-up call for supply chain management. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/.
- Christopher, M. The agile supply chain: Competing in volatile markets. Industrial Marketing Management 2000, 29, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christopher, M. , & Peck, H. Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management 2004, 15, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fitzsimmons, J. A. , & Douglas, M. J. (2005). Service management: Operations, strategy, and information technology. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Harland, C. M. , Lamming, R. C., & Cousins, P. D. Supply chain risk management: Outlining an agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 2001, 4, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawkins, T. G. , & Waller, M. A. The effect of task interdependence and type of relationship on supply chain disruption recovery. Journal of Business Logistics 2013, 34, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hendricks, K. B. , & Singhal, V. R. The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth. Journal of Operations Management 2003, 21, 501–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofmann, E. , & Osterwalder, F. Third-party logistics providers in the digital age: Towards digital supply chain management. Logistics 2017, 1, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holweg, M. , Lamming, R., & Jones, P. Supply chain strategy: A handbook. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 2011, 31, 358–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, S. , Barkhi, R., & Kaur, S. A hybrid approach for supply chain risk management: Integration of fuzzy DEMATEL and best-worst method. International Journal of Production Economics 2019, 213, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivanov, D. Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) case. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 2020, 136, 101922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jüttner, U. , Peck, H., & Christopher, M. Supply chain risk management: Outlining an agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 2003, 6, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H. , & Khan, T. Unlocking Sustainability through Supply Chain Visibility: Insights from the Manufacturing Sector of Bangladesh. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management 2024, 21, 2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovács, G. , & Tatham, P. Humanitarian logistics performance in the light of gender. International Journal of Production Economics 2009, 126, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pettit, T. J. , Fiksel, J. , & Croxton, K. L. Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics 2010, 31, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saar, R. , van der Meer, D., & Grefen, P. Achieving supply chain resilience through collaborative networks. International Journal of Production Research 2013, 51, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheffi, Y. , & Rice, J. B. A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review 2005, 47, 41–48. [Google Scholar]
- Simatupang, T. M. , & Sridharan, R. An integrative framework for supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Logistics Management 2005, 16, 257–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H. , & Khan, T. The mediating role of attitude towards the technology in shaping artificial intelligence usage among professionals. Telematics and Informatics Reports 2025, 17, 100188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomlin, B. On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Science 2006, 52, 639–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagner, S. M. Risk management in supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 2007, 12, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wieland, A. , & Wallenburg, C. M. Dealing with supply chain risks: Linking risk management practices and strategies to performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 2012, 42, 887–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zsidisin, G. A. Managerial perceptions of supply risk. Journal of Supply Chain Management 2003, 39, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X. , Huo, B., & Selen, W. The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration. Journal of Operations Management. [CrossRef]
- Ali, A. , Mahfouz, A., & Arisha, A. Analyzing supply chain resilience: Integrating the constructs in a concept mapping framework via a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 2017, 22, 16–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H. , & Khan, T. A Systematic Literature Review on Sustainability Integration and Marketing Intelligence in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Review of Business and Economics Studies 2024, 12, 6–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altay, N. , Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture. International Journal of Production Economics 2018, 205, 118–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barratt, M. Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 2004, 9, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, T. , & Emon, M. M. H. Supply chain performance in the age of Industry 4.0: evidence from manufacturing sector. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management 2025, 22, 2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blackhurst, J. , Dunn, K. S., & Craighead, C. W. An empirically derived framework of global supply resiliency. Journal of Business Logistics 2011, 32, 374–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busse, C. , Schleper, M. C., Niu, M., & Wagner, S. M. Supplier development for sustainability: Context, capabilities, and performance. International Journal of Production Economics 2017, 193, 491–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, M. , & Zhang, Q. Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management 2011, 29, 163–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, T. Y. , Rogers, D., & Vakil, B. (2020). Coronavirus is a wake-up call for supply chain management. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/.
- Christopher, M. , & Holweg, M. Supply chain 2.0: Managing supply chains in the era of turbulence. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 2011, 41, 63–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, M. M. H. , & Quaddus, M. Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory. International Journal of Production Economics 2017, 188, 185–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cole, R. , Stevenson, M., & Aitken, J. Blockchain technology: Implications for operations and supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 2019, 24, 469–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colicchia, C. , & Strozzi, F. Supply chain risk management: A new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 2012, 17, 403–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubey, R. , Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., & Wamba, S. F. Building theory of resilience in supply chains. International Journal of Production Research 2018, 56, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H. , & Khan, T. The transformative role of Industry 4.0 in supply chains: Exploring digital integration and innovation in the manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2025, 11, 100516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, Y. , & Stevenson, M. A review of supply chain risk management: Definition, theory, and research agenda. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 2018, 48, 205–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gligor, D. M. , & Holcomb, M. C. Understanding the role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility. International Journal of Logistics Management 2012, 23, 338–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivanov, D. Supply chain viability and the COVID-19 pandemic: A conceptual and formal generalization of four major adaptation strategies. International Journal of Production Research 2021, 59, 3535–3552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamalahmadi, M. , & Parast, M. M. A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research. International Journal of Production Economics 2016, 171, 116–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kache, F. , & Seuring, S. Challenges and opportunities of digital information at the intersection of Big Data Analytics and supply chain management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 2017, 37, 10–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S. , & Banerjee, R. Managing disruption risks in supply chains: A case study from India. International Journal of Production Research 2014, 52, 1708–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lund, S. , Manyika, J., & Woetzel, J. (2020). Risk, resilience, and rebalancing in global value chains. McKinsey Global Institute.
- Pettit, T. J. , Fiksel, J., & Croxton, K. L. Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics 2010, 31, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).