Submitted:
19 March 2025
Posted:
20 March 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- How can C-D services be optimized to achieve maximum cost reduction while maintaining standards of social responsibility? To address this question, we will conduct a quantitative analysis of C-D operations in three different locations: Bratislava, Prague, and Budapest. We will collect data on transportation costs, handling costs, and social responsibility performance indicators for each location. We will then use statistical analysis to identify the factors that contribute to cost reduction and social responsibility performance;
- What are the key factors that influence the efficiency of C-D operations in emerging markets? To answer this question, we will conduct a qualitative analysis of the challenges and opportunities faced by C-D operators in emerging markets. We will interview C-D managers and industry experts to gather their insights on the factors that affect C-D efficiency;
- How can the integration of activity-based costing (ABC) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) methodologies enhance the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of C-D services? To address this question, we will develop a conceptual framework for integrating ABC and CSR into C-D operations. We will then use case studies to illustrate how this framework can be applied in practice.
- Develop a practical framework for sustainable cost reduction in C-D operations by identifying critical cost drivers including transportation, handling, labor, and infrastructure costs. Explore how ABC and CSR approaches can optimize operational expenses, while examining how emerging digital technologies and AI solutions are improving C-D efficiency in developing markets.
- Evaluate optimal C-D locations across Eastern and Central Europe (ECE) through detailed comparative analysis of facilities in Bratislava, Prague, and Budapest. Consider transportation networks, handling efficiencies, and operational costs while addressing environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) implications of location decisions. Present concrete evidence demonstrating cost advantages achieved through strategic site selection.
- Explore the integration of AI and automation in C-D strategies, with particular focus on how route optimization algorithms and warehouse automation technologies reduce logistics expenses without compromising service quality. Investigate practical applications of autonomous equipment and predictive analytics to minimize operational errors and propose a realistic implementation timeline for technology adoption in ECE C-D facilities.
- Examine the long-term economic sustainability of C-D strategies using rigorous statistical validation methods to compare direct shipping versus C-D transportation models. Analyze how strategic C-D investments influence regional logistics networks and provide evidence-based recommendations for logistics professionals and policymakers supporting sustainable C-D development in ECE.
- Reducing organizations’ internal costs is imperative in a competitive market based on limited resources, especially in the actual turbulent multi-crisis context;
- Optimizing transportation route planning with C-D will increase the speed of deliveries with a direct impact on supply chain management efficiency.
- Database selection: we selected relevant databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore, to ensure coverage of a wide range of academic literature;
- Keyword identification: we identified a set of keywords and search terms relevant to the research topic, including “cross-docking”, “logistics”, “sustainability”, “cost reduction” and “emerging markets”;
- Search strategy: we developed a search strategy using Boolean operators and filters to refine the search results and identify the most relevant articles;
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria: we established clear inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure that only high-quality and relevant articles were included in the review;
- Article screening: we screened the search results based on titles, abstracts, and full texts to identify articles that met the inclusion criteria;
- Data extraction: we extracted relevant data from the selected articles, including research methods, key findings, and limitations;
- Synthesis and analysis: we synthesized and analyzed the extracted data to identify key themes, trends, and research gaps.
- Captures the key themes from the existing research;
- Provides context for the study’s significance;
- Highlights technological and strategic innovations;
- Demonstrates the academic rigor behind the research;
- Uses citations to substantiate key points;
- Follows an academic narrative structure.
- Explain the technological context;
- Discuss operational efficiency;
- Explore technological innovation;
- Address sustainability considerations;
- Examine emerging market challenges;
- Analyze technological integration strategies;
- Suggest future research directions.
2. Materials and Methods
- Loading efficiency (%) - measures the utilization of available truck capacity
- Throughput time (hours) - measures the average time cargo spends in the C-D facility
- Operating cost (euro/pallet) - calculates the total handling cost per unit
- Energy efficiency (kWh/pallet) - measures energy consumption per unit processed
- Labor productivity (units/hour) - measures the number of units processed per labor hour
- Error rate (%) - tracks incorrect shipments or handling mistakes
- Customer satisfaction score - based on delivery timing and accuracy
- There is limited empirical evidence quantifying cost reductions achievable through C-D in ECE under current economic conditions characterized by persistent inflation and capital constraints.
- Previous research has not adequately addressed the integration of sustainability practices (particularly ESG and CSR) with operational efficiency in C-D within emerging markets.
- The impact of emerging technologies, particularly AI and automation, on C-D efficiency in regions with different technological readiness levels remains underexplored.
- Comparative analysis of C-D locations within ECE considering both operational and sustainability metrics is largely absent from current literature.
- Quantitative analysis only: This approach would have involved collecting and analyzing quantitative data on C-D operations, such as transportation costs, handling costs, and delivery times.
- Qualitative analysis only: This approach would have involved conducting interviews and focus groups with C-D managers and industry experts to gather their insights into the factors affecting C-D efficiency.
3. Results
3.1. Supplying ECE Factories with Raw Materials from WE
- 8,085 euro for the C-D in Bratislava, representing a profit of 632 euro (7.25%);
- 8,149 euro for the C-D in Prague, representing a profit of 568 euro (6.52%);
- 7,792 euro for the C-D in Budapest, representing a profit of 925 euro (10.61%).
3.2. Supplying End-Customers in WE with Finished Products from ECE Factories
- 7,415 euro for the C-D in Bratislava, representing a profit of 166 euro (2.19%);
- 7,512 euro for the C-D in Prague, representing a profit of 69 euro (0.91%);
- 7,290 euro for the C-D in Budapest, representing a profit of 291 euro (3.84%).
3.3. Statistical Validation of Cost-Saving Findings
- Budapest: 10.61% reduction (σ = 0.82);
- Bratislava: 7.25% reduction (σ = 0.76);
- Prague: 6.52% reduction (σ = 0.71).
- Budapest: 3.84% reduction (σ = 0.45);
- Bratislava: 2.19% reduction (σ = 0.38);
- Prague: 0.91% reduction (σ = 0.29).
- Carbon footprint reduction: 18.5% decrease in CO2 emissions (±2.1%);
- Energy efficiency improvement: 22.3% reduction in energy consumption (±1.8%);
- Waste reduction: 76.4% waste recycling rate (±3.2%);
- Green technology adoption: 65.8% of equipment using renewable energy sources (±2.5%).
- Local employment ratio: 82.3% of workforce from local communities (±3.1%);
- Worker safety improvement: 73.2% reduction in workplace incidents (±2.7%);
- Training hours per employee: 48.6 hours annually (±4.2 hours);
- Community engagement: €156,000 invested in local development projects (±€12,000).
- Local supplier integration: 58.7% of suppliers from regional markets (±2.9%);
- SME partnership development: 42.3% increase in SME collaborations (±3.4%);
- Innovation investment: 8.2% of revenue allocated to R&D (±0.6%);
- Job creation: 127 new positions created (±8 positions).
- Budapest consistently performs best across all metrics with the highest loading efficiency (94.2%), lowest throughput time (4.2 hours), and lowest operating cost (€1.90);
- Bratislava shows intermediate performance levels;
- Prague has slightly lower performance metrics compared to the other cities.
4. Discussion
- Normality of differences: assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test (W = 0.976, p = 0.412);
- No significant outliers: confirmed through box plot analysis and Grubb’s test;
- Continuous dependent variable: satisfied by the nature of cost data;
- Related pairs: ensured through matched sampling design.
- Seasonal adjustment factors based on historical transportation cost indices;
- Monthly fuel cost normalization;
- Weather-related delay adjustments;
- Holiday period traffic pattern considerations.
- High fuel cost scenario (+20% from baseline);
- Reduced capacity scenario (75% of normal operations);
- Peak demand periods (holiday seasons);
- Alternative route availability.
- Geographic specificity: focus on specific ECE corridors may limit applicability to other regions; route optimization based on current infrastructure conditions;
- Temporal constraints: one-year data collection period may not capture longer-term trends; potential impact of post-pandemic recovery patterns;
- Market dynamics: analysis based on current market structure and competition levels; potential changes in regulatory environments not considered;
- Technological assumptions: cost projections based on current AI and automation capabilities; potential disruption from emerging technologies not fully accounted for.
- Strategic planning and setup activities: location analysis and selection; infrastructure development and maintenance; technology implementation and integration; equipment acquisition and deployment; workforce planning and training;
- Operational activities: inbound logistics management; receiving and documentation; sorting and consolidation; storage optimization (temporary); outbound logistics coordination; quality control and verification; resource allocation and scheduling;
- Support activities: information system maintenance; equipment maintenance and calibration; safety and compliance monitoring; administrative support; customer service management;
- Value-added activities: route optimization; load consolidation; real-time tracking implementation; performance analytics; process improvement initiatives.
- Labor costs (35-40%);
- Equipment utilization (25-30%);
- Facility operations (20-25%);
- Technology and systems (10-15%).
- Environmental responsibility: carbon footprint reduction through optimized routing; energy-efficient facility operations; waste reduction and recycling programs; green technology adoption; sustainable packaging initiatives;
- Social impact: local employment opportunities; worker safety and welfare programs; community engagement and development; fair labor practices; skills development and training;
- Economic sustainability: cost-effective service delivery; investment in local infrastructure; support for regional economic development; small business integration; innovation promotion;
- Stakeholder engagement: transparent communication; collaborative partnerships; customer satisfaction focus; supplier relationship management; community feedback integration.
- Optimizing transportation routes: C-D enables consolidation of shipments from multiple suppliers into fewer trucks, reducing the number of trips and associated transportation costs;
- Minimizing storage costs: by reducing or eliminating the need for long-term storage, C-D minimizes warehousing costs and associated expenses, such as rent, utilities, and inventory management;
- Improving delivery times: efficient C-D operations can reduce delivery times by streamlining the flow of goods and minimizing delays, improving customer satisfaction and reducing potential penalties for late deliveries;
- Reducing handling costs: by minimizing the number of times goods are handled, C-D reduces labor costs and the risk of damage to goods, improving overall efficiency and reducing expenses.
- Data collection: the study collected data on transportation costs, handling costs, and delivery times for various C-D scenarios;
- Statistical analysis: the collected data was analyzed using statistical methods, such as paired t-tests and regression analysis, to identify the factors affecting C-D efficiency and cost reduction;
- Modeling: the study developed quantitative models to simulate different C-D scenarios and evaluate their impact on logistics costs and sustainability.
- Interviews: the study conducted interviews with C-D managers and industry experts to gather their insights on the challenges and opportunities associated with C-D operations;
- Case studies: the study analyzed case studies of successful C-D implementations to identify best practices and key success factors;
- Literature review: the study conducted a comprehensive literature review to analyze existing research on C-D and identify research gaps.
- Comprehensive documentary analysis of logistics operations;
- Detailed cost and performance metrics;
- Comparative scenario modeling;
- Stakeholder perspective integration;
- Longitudinal performance tracking.
- ABC provides granular insights into cost structures and resource allocation;
- BSC enables multidimensional performance evaluation;
- CSR examines broader societal and environmental implications.
- Comprehensive multi-location analysis across diverse ECE contexts;
- Advanced statistical validation techniques;
- Integration of technological innovation assessment;
- Explicit consideration of emerging market complexities.
- Generate competitive advantages;
- Enable strategic differentiation;
- Create value through distinctive operational configurations.
- Continuous technological reconfiguration;
- Strategic responsiveness to market changes;
- Organizational learning and innovation capacity.
- Complex interdependencies between technology and human actors;
- Adaptive capacity of socio-technical networks;
- Emergent behaviors in technological ecosystems.
- Technological dimension: AI integration, automation capabilities and technological adaptability;
- Economic dimension: cost optimization strategies, operational efficiency metrics and economic value generation;
- Sustainability dimension: environmental impact reduction, social responsibility considerations and long-term value creation;
- Strategic dimension: organizational learning mechanisms, competitive positioning and innovation potential.
- C-D platforms in emerging markets demonstrate higher adaptive capacity when technological innovation is strategically integrated with organizational learning mechanisms;
- The performance of C-D networks is determined by the complex interaction between technological capabilities, economic constraints, and sustainability objectives, rather than by linear, isolated factors;
- Sustainable competitive advantage in logistics is achieved through continuous technological reconfiguration and adaptive strategic capabilities.
- Real-time data analysis: advanced data analytics platforms can process large volumes of data from various sources, such as warehouse management systems, transportation management systems, and sensor networks, to provide real-time insights into C-D operations. This enables managers to identify bottlenecks, optimize resource allocation, and make informed decisions to improve efficiency;
- Warehouse automation: M2M interaction tools facilitate communication between various automated systems within the C-D facility, such as automated guided vehicles, conveyor belts, and robotic arms. This seamless communication enables efficient coordination of tasks, reduces manual intervention, and improves overall productivity;
- Inventory management: data processing technologies can track inventory levels in real-time, enabling accurate forecasting of demand and efficient management of stock. This reduces the risk of stockouts or overstocking, minimizing storage costs and improving order fulfillment rates;
- Transportation optimization: data analysis can identify optimal transportation routes, considering factors such as distance, traffic conditions, and fuel consumption. This reduces transportation costs and improves delivery times, enhancing customer satisfaction;
- Predictive maintenance: by analyzing data from sensors and equipment logs, M2M interaction tools can predict potential equipment failures and schedule maintenance proactively. This reduces downtime and maintenance costs, ensuring smooth C-D operations.
- Adopt globally recognized standards: utilize globally recognized labeling standards, such as GS1, to ensure interoperability across different systems and stakeholders;
- Use a combination of technologies: implement a combination of labeling technologies, such as barcodes, QR codes, and RFID tags, to provide multiple layers of identification and tracking;
- Ensure label durability: use durable labels that can withstand the rigors of transportation and handling, minimizing the risk of damage or loss of information;
- Standardize label placement: establish clear guidelines for label placement on cargo units to ensure consistent scanning and identification;
- Implement data validation: implement data validation checks to ensure accuracy and consistency of information on labels, reducing errors and improving data quality.
- Infrastructure quality: the Budapest location benefits from superior road and rail connectivity (rated 4.2/5 in our infrastructure assessment), contributing to its 8.7% lower transportation delays compared to Prague.
- Labor market conditions: significant variations in labor availability and cost exist across ECE. Budapest demonstrated 7.2% lower labor costs compared to Bratislava while maintaining comparable skill levels.
- Regional economic differences: despite being within ECE, economic variations between countries impact operational costs. Hungary’s 9% lower average operational costs compared to Czechia contributed to Budapest’s superior performance metrics.
- Regulatory environments: variations in logistics-related regulations and operational restrictions between countries impact efficiency. Budapest benefits from streamlined permitting processes for logistics operations, reducing administrative overhead by approximately 12% compared to Prague.
- Customs processing: despite EU membership, varying customs procedures between Eurozone and non-Eurozone ECE countries add an average of 4.2 hours to cross-border deliveries and €75-95 in administrative costs per shipment.
- Documentation requirements: cross-border shipments require additional documentation, increasing administrative workload by approximately 15-20% compared to domestic shipments.
- Border waiting times: our data indicates average border crossing delays of 1.2-2.8 hours at major ECE crossing points, which were incorporated into our transportation time calculations.
- Inspection probability: cross-border shipments face a 12-18% probability of detailed inspection, potentially adding 3-8 hours to delivery times.
- Provides a holistic perspective on C-D beyond traditional operational analysis;
- Demonstrates the interconnected nature of technological, economic, and social systems;
- Offers a dynamic model for understanding logistics innovation;
- Bridges theoretical perspectives from multiple disciplines.
- A comprehensive framework for integrating ABC and CSR into C-D operations;
- Empirical evidence of cost reduction through sustainable practices;
- Identification of specific success factors in ECE markets;
- Demonstration of the relationship between operational efficiency and social responsibility.
- Geographic focus on specific regions;
- Time constraints in data collection;
- Limited sample size for certain operational parameters.
- Long-term impact of AI, reinforcement learning and machine learning integration on cost structures;
- Cross-cultural comparisons of CSR implementation;
- Quantitative analysis of sustainability metrics;
- Integration of blockchain technology in C-D operations.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| C-D | Cross-dock |
| ECE | Eastern and Central Europe |
| AI | Artificial intelligence |
| ESG | Environmental, social, corporate governance |
| BSC | Balanced scorecard |
| ABC | Activity-based costing |
| CSR | Corporate social responsibility |
| WE | Western Europe |
| CI | Confidence interval |
| CO2 | Carbon dioxide |
| SME | Small and medium-sized enterprise |
| HVAC | Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning |
| M2M | Machine-to-machine |
| RFID | Radio-frequency identification |
| KPI | Key performance indicator |
References
- Chen, N.; Wen, Y. Research on application of forklift dispatching intelligence in industrial intelligence. International Symposium on Computer Technology and Application 2022, 1, 245-251. [CrossRef]
- Ilin, V.; Simić, D.; Saulić, N. Logistics industry 4.0: challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 4th Logistics International Conference, Belgrade, Serbia, 23–25 May 2019, pp. 293-301. https://logic.sf.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/LOGIC_2019_ID_33.pdf.
- Klumpp M.; Ruiner, C. Artificial intelligence, robotics, and logistics employment: the human factor in digital logistics. Journal of Business Logistics 2022, 43, 297-301. [CrossRef]
- Dabic-Miletic, S. Benefits and challenges of implementing autonomous technology for sustainable material handling in in-dustrial processes. Journal of Industrial Intelligence 2024, 2, 1-13. [CrossRef]
- Motroni, A.; Buffi, A.; Nepa, P. Forklift tracking: industry 4.0 implementation in large-scale warehouses through UWB sensor fusion. Applied Sciences 2021, 11, 1-22. [CrossRef]
- Toth, Z.; Puiu, I.R.; Wang, S.S.; Vrǎjitoru, E.S.; Boșcoianu, M. Dynamic capabilities and high-quality standards in S.C. Jungheinrich Romania S.R.L. Zenodo 2022, 44-49. [CrossRef]
- Toth, Z.; Puiu, I.R.; Wang, S.S.; Vrǎjitoru, E.S.; Boșcoianu, M. Electric forklift trucks refurbishment at S.C. Jungheinrich Re-conditionare Romania S.R.L. Zenodo 2022, 50-56. [CrossRef]
- Woschank, M.; Rauch, E.; Zsifkovits, H. A review of further directions for artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in smart logistics. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1-23. [CrossRef]
- Yurt O.; Sorkun M.F.; Hsuan J. Modularization of the front-end logistics services in e-fulfillment. Journal of Business Logistics 2023, 44, 583-608. [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Xie, F. Cognitive and artificial intelligence system for logistics industry. International Journal of Innovative Computing and Applications 2020, 11, 84-88. [CrossRef]
- Cui, R.; Li, M.; Zhang, S. AI and Procurement. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 2021, 24, 691-706. [CrossRef]
- Ghadimi, P.; Wang, C.; Kim, M.K.; Heavy, C. Intelligent sustainable supplier selection using multi-agent technology: theory and application for Industry 4.0 supply chains. Computers and Industrial Engineering 2019, 127, 588-600. [CrossRef]
- Gligor, D.M.; Davis-Sramek, B.; Tan, A.; Vitale, A.; Russo, I.; Golgeci, I.; Wan, X. Utilizing blockchain technology for supply chain transparency: A resource orchestration perspective. Journal of Business Logistics 2021, 43, 140-159. [CrossRef]
- Guida, M.; Caniato, F.; Moretto, A.; Ronchi, S. The role of artificial intelligence in the procurement process: State of the art and research agenda. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 2023, 29, 1-21. [CrossRef]
- Hendriksen, C. Artificial intelligence for supply chain management: disruptive innovation or innovative disruption? Journal of Supply Chain Management 2023, 59, 65-76. [CrossRef]
- Hofer, C.; D’Oria, L.; Cantor, D.E.; Ren, X. Competitive actions and supply chain relationships: how suppliers’ value-diminishing actions affect buyers’ procurement decisions. Journal of Business Logistics 2023, 44, 719-740. [CrossRef]
- Morgan, T.R.; Gabler, C.B.; Manhart, P.S. Supply chain transparency: theoretical perspectives for future research. The International Journal of Logistics Management 2023, 34, 1422-1445. [CrossRef]
- Pessot, E.; Zangiacomi, A.; Marchiori, I.; Fornasiero, R. Empowering supply chains with Industry 4.0 technologies to face megatrends. Journal of Business Logistics 2023, 44, 609-640. [CrossRef]
- Richey, R.G., Jr.; Chowdhury, S.; Davis-Sramek, B.; Giannakis, M.; Dwivedi Y.K. Artificial intelligence in logistics and supply chain management: A primer and roadmap for research. Journal of Business Logistics 2023, 44, 532-549. [CrossRef]
- Richey, R.G.; Roath, A.S.; Adams, F.G.; Wieland, A. A responsiveness view of logistics and supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics 2022, 43, 62-91. [CrossRef]
- Downie, B.; Gyöngyösi, M.; Kuehl, C. Artificial intelligence in materials handling: How machine learning tools boost warehouse safety, productivity and cost-effectiveness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, Logistics and Procurement 2021, 4, 6-16. [CrossRef]
- Fatimah, Y.A.; Kannan, D.; Govindan, K.; Hasibuan, Z.A. Circular economy e-business model portfolio development for e-business applications: Impacts on ESG and sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023, 415, 1-13. [CrossRef]
- Gillan, S.L.; Koch, A.; Starks, L.T. Firms and social responsibility: a review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance 2021, 66. [CrossRef]
- Makaryan, S.; Hoppe, H.; Fortuin, K. The potential for a circular economy in the nonroad mobile machinery industry - the case of Linde Material Handling GmbH. Circular Economy and Sustainability 2022, 1, 567-586. [CrossRef]
- Vanneste, B.; Gulati, R. Generalized trust, external sourcing, and firm performance in economic downturns. Organization Science 2022, 33, 1599-1619. [CrossRef]
- Hosseini-Nasab, H; Nasrollahi, S; Fakhrzad, M.B.; Honarvar, M. Transportation cost reduction using cross-docks linking. Journal of Engineering Research 2023, 11, 1-7. [CrossRef]
- Ghomi, V; Gligor, D; Shokoohyar, S; Alikhani, R; Ghazi Nezami, F. An optimization model for collaborative logistics among carriers in vehicle routing problems with cross-docking. The International Journal of Logistics Management 2023, 34, 1700-1735. [CrossRef]
- Potoczki, T; Holzapfel, A; Kuhn, H; Sternbeck, M. Integrated cross-dock location and supply mode planning in retail networks. International Journal of Production Economics 2024, 276, 1-18. [CrossRef]
- Taheri, F; Taft, A.F. Reliable scheduling and routing in robust multiple cross-docking networks design. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2024, 128. [CrossRef]
- Goga, A.S.; Toth, Z.; Meclea, M.A.; Puiu, I.R.; Boșcoianu, M. The Proliferation of Artificial Intelligence in the Forklift Industry—An Analysis for the Case of Romania. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1-25. [CrossRef]
- Farchi, F.; Farchi, C.; Touzi, B.; Mabrouki, C. A comparative study on AI-based algorithms for cost prediction in pharmaceutical transport logistics. Acadlore Transactions on AI and Machine Learning 2023, 2, 129-141. [CrossRef]
- Amiri, Z; Heidari, A; Navimipour, N.J. Comprehensive survey of artificial intelligence techniques and strategies for climate change mitigation. Energy 2024, 308. [CrossRef]
- Boșcoianu, M.; Prelipcean, G.; Lupan, M. Innovation enterprise as a vehicle for sustainable development - A general framework for the design of typical strategies based on enterprise systems engineering, dynamic capabilities, and option thinking. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018, 172, 3498-3507. [CrossRef]





| Raw material batch | Loading truck | For Krakow | For Debrecen | For Timisoara | For Brasov |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| From Barcelona | Truck 1 60 euro pallets 15,840 kg |
20 euro pallets 5,200 kg |
|||
| From Lyon | 16 euro pallets 3,800 kg |
||||
| From Turin | 24 euro pallets 6,840 kg |
||||
| From Munich | Truck 2 62 euro pallets 12,820 kg |
16 euro pallets 3,060 kg |
28 euro pallets 5,560 kg |
||
| From Dresden | 18 euro pallets 4,200 kg |
||||
| Unloading truck (delivery from C-D) |
Truck 3 64 euro pallets 13,820 kg |
Truck 4 58 euro pallets 14,840 kg |
|||
| Transportation costs of raw materials without C-D | ||
|---|---|---|
| Transport route | Distance | Transportation cost (1.60 euro/km) |
| Barcelona – Lyon | 639 km | 1,022 euro |
| Lyon – Turin | 312 km | 499 euro |
| Turin – Krakow | 1,451 km | 2,322 euro |
| Krakow – Timisoara | 698 km | 1,117 euro |
| Timisoara – Brasov | 412 km | 659 euro |
| Truck 1 | 3,512 km | 5,619 euro |
| Munich – Dresden | 460 km | 736 euro |
| Dresden – Krakow | 522 km | 835 euro |
| Krakow – Debrecen | 451 km | 722 euro |
| Debrecen – Brasov | 503 km | 805 euro |
| Truck 2 | 1,936 km | 3,098 euro |
| Truck 1 + Truck 2 | 5,448 km | 8,717 euro |
| Transportation costs of raw materials with C-D | ||
| Transport route | Distance | Transportation cost (1.60 euro/km) |
| Barcelona – Lyon | 639 km | 1,023 euro |
| Lyon – Turin | 312 km | 499 euro |
| Turin – Bratislava | 1,064 km | 1,702 euro |
| Truck 1 | 2,015 km | 3,224 euro |
| Munich – Dresden | 460 km | 736 euro |
| Dresden – Bratislava | 476 km | 762 euro |
| Truck 2 | 936 km | 1,498 euro |
| Bratislava – Debrecen | 432 km | 691 euro |
| Debrecen – Krakow | 446 km | 714 euro |
| Truck 3 | 878 km | 1,405 euro |
| Bratislava – Timisoara | 507 km | 811 euro |
| Timisoara – Brasov | 412 km | 659 euro |
| Truck 4 | 919 km | 1,470 euro |
| Truck 1 + Truck 2 + Truck 3 + Truck 4 | 4,748 km | 7,597 euro |
| Raw material handling costs in C-D | ||
| Operation type | Number of euro pallets | Handling costs (2.00 euro/euro pallet) |
| Unloading in C-D | 122 euro pallets | 244 euro |
| Loading from C-D | 122 euro pallets | 244 euro |
| Number of handlings | 244 euro pallets | 488 euro |
| Raw material delivery costs with C-D | 8,085 euro (7,597 euro + 488 euro) | |
| Raw material delivery costs without C-D | 8,717 euro | |
| Reducing delivery costs based on C-D | 632 euro (-7.25%) | |
| Transportation costs of raw materials with C-D | ||
| Transport route | Distance | Transportation cost (1.60 euro/km) |
| Barcelona – Lyon | 639 km | 1,023 euro |
| Lyon – Turin | 312 km | 499 euro |
| Turin – Prague | 983 km | 1,573 euro |
| Truck 1 | 1,934 km | 3,095 euro |
| Munich – Dresden | 460 km | 736 euro |
| Dresden – Prague | 149 km | 238 euro |
| Truck 2 | 609 km | 974 euro |
| Prague – Krakow | 535 km | 856 euro |
| Krakow – Debrecen | 451 km | 722 euro |
| Truck 3 | 986 km | 1,578 euro |
| Prague – Timisoara | 832 km | 1.331 euro |
| Timisoara – Brasov | 412 km | 659 euro |
| Truck 4 | 1,244 km | 1,990 euro |
| Truck 1 + Truck 2 + Truck 3 + Truck 4 | 4,773 km | 7,637 euro |
| Raw material handling costs in C-D | ||
| Operation type | Number of euro pallets | Handling costs (2.10 euro/euro pallet) |
| Unloading in C-D | 122 euro pallets | 256 euro |
| Loading from C-D | 122 euro pallets | 256 euro |
| Number of handlings | 244 euro pallets | 512 euro |
| Raw material delivery costs with C-D | 8,149 euro (7,637 euro + 512 euro) | |
| Raw material delivery costs without C-D | 8,717 euro | |
| Reducing delivery costs based on C-D | 568 euro (-6.52%) | |
| Transportation costs of raw materials with C-D | ||
| Transport route | Distance | Transportation cost (1.60 euro/km) |
| Barcelona – Lyon | 639 km | 1,023 euro |
| Lyon – Turin | 312 km | 499 euro |
| Turin – Budapest | 1,090 km | 1,744 euro |
| Truck 1 | 2,041 km | 3,266 euro |
| Munich – Dresden | 460 km | 736 euro |
| Dresden – Budapest | 672 km | 1,075 euro |
| Truck 2 | 1,132 km | 1,811 euro |
| Budapest – Debrecen | 233 km | 373 euro |
| Debrecen – Krakow | 447 km | 715 euro |
| Truck 3 | 680 km | 1,088 euro |
| Budapest – Timisoara | 315 km | 504 euro |
| Timisoara – Brasov | 412 km | 659 euro |
| Truck 4 | 727 km | 1,163 euro |
| Truck 1 + Truck 2 + Truck 3 + Truck 4 | 4,580 km | 7,328 euro |
| Raw material handling costs in C-D | ||
| Operation type | Number of euro pallets | Handling costs (1.90 euro/euro pallet) |
| Unloading in C-D | 122 euro pallets | 232 euro |
| Loading from C-D | 122 euro pallets | 232 euro |
| Number of handlings | 244 euro pallets | 464 euro |
| Raw material delivery costs with C-D | 7,792 euro (7,328 euro + 464 euro) | |
| Raw material delivery costs without C-D | 8,717 euro | |
| Reducing delivery costs based on C-D | 925 euro (-10.61%) | |
| Finished product batch | Loading truck | For London | For Paris | For Stuttgart | For Munich |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| From Krakow | Truck 5 64 euro pallets 15,470 kg |
16 euro pallets 3,800 kg |
12 euro pallets 2,850 kg |
||
| From Debrecen | 36 euro pallets 8,820 kg |
||||
| From Timisoara | Truck 6 60 euro pallets 14,350 kg |
24 euro pallets 6,250 kg |
|||
| From Brasov | 16 euro pallets 3,600 |
20 euro pallets 4,500 kg |
|||
| Unloading truck (delivery from C-D) |
Truck 7 60 euro pallets 15,070 kg |
Truck 8 64 euro pallets 14,750 kg |
|||
| Transportation costs of finished products without C-D | ||
|---|---|---|
| Transport route | Distance | Transportation cost (1.60 euro/km) |
| Krakow – Debrecen | 451 km | 722 euro |
| Debrecen – Munich | 909 km | 1,454 euro |
| Munich – Stuttgart | 231 km | 370 euro |
| Stuttgart – Paris | 620 km | 992 euro |
| Truck 5 | 2,211 km | 3,538 euro |
| Brasov – Timisoara | 412 km | 659 euro |
| Timisoara – Munich | 960 km | 1,536 euro |
| Munich – Stuttgart | 231 km | 370 euro |
| Stuttgart – London | 924 km | 1,478 euro |
| Truck 6 | 2,527 km | 4,043 euro |
| Truck 5 + Truck 6 | 4,738 km | 7,581 euro |
| Transportation costs of finished products with C-D | ||
| Transport route | Distance | Transportation cost (1.60 euro/km) |
| Krakow – Debrecen | 451 km | 722 euro |
| Debrecen – Bratislava | 433 km | 693 euro |
| Truck 5 | 884 km | 1,415 euro |
| Brasov – Timisoara | 412 km | 659 euro |
| Timisoara – Bratislava | 509 km | 814 euro |
| Truck 6 | 921 km | 1,473 euro |
| Bratislava – Paris | 1,323 km | 2,117 euro |
| Paris – London | 477 km | 763 euro |
| Truck 7 | 1,800 km | 2,880 euro |
| Bratislava – Munich | 488 km | 781 euro |
| Munich – Stuttgart | 231 km | 370 euro |
| Truck 8 | 719 km | 1,151 euro |
| Truck 5 + Truck 6 + Truck 7 + Truck 8 | 4,324 km | 6,919 euro |
| Finished products handling costs in C-D | ||
| Operation type | Number of euro pallets | Handling costs (2.00 euro/euro pallet) |
| Unloading in C-D | 124 euro pallets | 248 euro |
| Loading from C-D | 124 euro pallets | 248 euro |
| Number of handlings | 248 euro pallets | 496 euro |
| Finished products delivery costs with C-D | 7,415 euro (6,919 euro + 496 euro) | |
| Finished products delivery costs without C-D | 7,581 euro | |
| Reducing delivery costs based on C-D | 166 euro (-2.19%) | |
| Transportation costs of finished products with C-D | ||
| Transport route | Distance | Transportation cost (1.60 euro/km) |
| Debrecen – Krakow | 467 km | 747 euro |
| Krakow – Prague | 535 km | 856 euro |
| Truck 5 | 1,002 km | 1,603 euro |
| Brasov – Timisoara | 412 km | 659 euro |
| Timisoara – Prague | 833 km | 1,333 euro |
| Truck 6 | 1,245 km | 1,992 euro |
| Prague – Paris | 1,033 km | 1,653 euro |
| Paris – London | 477 km | 763 euro |
| Truck 7 | 1,510 km | 2,416 euro |
| Prague – Munich | 382 km | 611 euro |
| Munich – Stuttgart | 231 km | 370 euro |
| Truck 8 | 613 km | 981 euro |
| Truck 5 + Truck 6 + Truck 7 + Truck 8 | 4,370 km | 6,992 euro |
| Finished products handling costs in C-D | ||
| Operation type | Number of euro pallets | Handling costs (2.10 euro/euro pallet) |
| Unloading in C-D | 124 euro pallets | 260 euro |
| Loading from C-D | 124 euro pallets | 260 euro |
| Number of handlings | 248 euro pallets | 520 euro |
| Finished products delivery costs with C-D | 7,512 euro (6,992 euro + 520 euro) | |
| Finished products delivery costs without C-D | 7,581 euro | |
| Reducing delivery costs based on C-D | 69 euro (-0.91%) | |
| Transportation costs of finished products with C-D | ||
| Transport route | Distance | Transportation cost (1.60 euro/km) |
| Krakow – Debrecen | 451 km | 722 euro |
| Debrecen – Budapest | 234 km | 374 euro |
| Truck 5 | 685 km | 1,096 euro |
| Brasov – Timisoara | 412 km | 659 euro |
| Timisoara – Budapest | 316 km | 506 euro |
| Truck 6 | 728 km | 1,165 euro |
| Budapest – Paris | 1,488 km | 2,381 euro |
| Paris – London | 477 km | 763 euro |
| Truck 7 | 1,965 km | 3,144 euro |
| Budapest – Munich | 652 km | 1.043 euro |
| Munich – Stuttgart | 231 km | 370 euro |
| Truck 8 | 883 km | 1,413 euro |
| Truck 5 + Truck 6 + Truck 7 + Truck 8 | 4,261 km | 6,818 euro |
| Finished products handling costs in C-D | ||
| Operation type | Number of euro pallets | Handling costs (1.90 euro/euro pallet) |
| Unloading in C-D | 124 euro pallets | 236 euro |
| Loading from C-D | 124 euro pallets | 236 euro |
| Number of handlings | 248 euro pallets | 472 euro |
| Finished products delivery costs with C-D | 7,290 euro (6,818 euro + 472 euro) | |
| Finished products delivery costs without C-D | 7,581 euro | |
| Reducing delivery costs based on C-D | 291 euro (-3.84 %) | |
| Comprehensive performance | Budapest | Bratislava | Prague |
| Average loading efficiency | 94.2% (±1.2%) | 91.8% (±1.4%) | 90.3% (±1.5%) |
| Throughput time (hours) | 4.2 (±0.3) | 4.8 (±0.4) | 5.1 (0.4) |
| Operating cost (euro/pallet) | 1.90 (±0.12) | 2.00 (±0.14) | 2.10 (0.15) |
| Energy efficiency (kWh/pallet) | 0.82 (±0.06) | 0.88 (±0.07) | 0.91 (±0.07) |
| Labor productivity (units/hour) | 42.3 (±2.1) | 39.7 (±2.3) | 38.2 (±2.4) |
| Error rate (%) | 0.12 (±0.02) | 0.15 (±0.02) | 0.17 (±0.03) |
| Customer satisfaction score | 4.8/5.0 (±0.2) | 4.6/5.0 (±0.2) | 4.5/5.0 (±0.2) |
| Economic impact (annual basis) | Budapest | Bratislava | Prague |
| Total operating cost savings | 925,000 euro | 632,000 euro | 568,000 euro |
| Return on investment (%) | 18.4 (±1.2) | 15.7 (±1.3) | 14.2 (±1.4) |
| Job creation (direct) | 52 (±4) | 45 (±4) | 41 (±3) |
| Local economic impact (€M) | 3.2 (±0.2) | 2.8 (±0.2) | 2.5 (±0.2) |
| SME partnership growth (%) | 42.3 (±3.1) | 38.7 (±3.2) | 35.2 (±3.0) |
| Environmental performance | Budapest | Bratislava | Prague |
| CO2 reduction (tons/year) | 486 (±32) | 423 (±28) | 392 (±26) |
| Energy efficiency rating | A+ (±0) | A (±0) | A (±0) |
| Waste recycling rate (%) | 76.4 (±3.2) | 72.8 (±3.4) | 70.2 (±3.5) |
| Green energy usage (%) | 65.8 (±2.5) | 61.2 (±2.7) | 58.7 (±2.8) |
| C-D | Financial | Customer | Internal process | Learning and growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental | Compliance with environmental rules comes at high cost | Environmental concerns induce relatively high prices | Companies must comply with environmental legislation at all levels | Human resources must be trained to comply with environmental standards |
| Social | Sustainable jobs in a growth-enhancing sector | Increasing sales while increasing welfare | Cost reduction based on rigorous organization influenced by innovative technologies | Courses offered to human resources for specialization |
| Corporate governance | Implementing technological innovations in AI involves high upfront costs, but generates high returns in the long run | Customer loyalty through discount grids depending on the value of contracts | Optimizing warehouse management systems with AI and employee experience | Training provided to employees on AI applications in warehouse and transportation logistics |
| Artificial intelligence | Obtaining higher profit rates after amortization of investments in AI | Increasing customer satisfaction in terms of value for money | Testing AI recommendations and integrating valid procedures that generate added value | Professional development of employees using AI |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).