Submitted:
17 March 2025
Posted:
18 March 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ethical Approval
2.2. Study Samples
2.3. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance Test
2.4. SEM Analysis
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Leonardo, M.R.; Silva, L.A.; Nelson-Filho, P.; Silva, R.A.; Raffaini, M.S. Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators during root canal length determination in primary teeth. Int. Endod. J. 2008, 41, 317–321. [CrossRef]
- Zubizarreta-Macho, Á.; Mena Álvarez, J.; Albaladejo Martínez, A.; Segura-Egea, J.J.; Caviedes Brucheli, J.; Agustín-Panadero, R.; López Píriz, R.; Alonso-Ezpeleta, Ó. Influence of the Pecking Motion Frequency on the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Endodontic Rotary Files. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 9, 45. [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, F.; Adeodato, C.; Barbosa, I.; Aboud, L.; Scelza, P.; Zaccaro Scelza, M. Movement kinematics and cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments: a systematic review. Int. Endod. J. 2017, 50, 143–152. [CrossRef]
- Govindaraju, L.; Jeevanandan, G.; Subramanian, E.M.G. Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur. J. Dent. 2017, 11, 376–379. [CrossRef]
- Rosa, F.M.; Modesto, A.; Faraco-Junior, I.M. Manual and rotary instrumentation techniques for root canal preparation in primary molars. Dent. 3000. 2014, 2, 1-5. [CrossRef]
- George, S.; Anandaraj, S.; Issac, J.S.; John, S.A.; Harris, A. Rotary endodontics in primary teeth - A review. Saudi Dent. J. 2016, 28, 12–17. [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, H.M. Pulpectomy procedures in primary molar teeth. Eur. J. Gen. Dent. 2014, 3, 3–10. https://doi.org.10.4103/2278-9626.126201.
- Barr, E.S.; Kleier, D.J.; Barr, N.V. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr. Dent. 2000, 22, 77–78. PMID: 10730297.
- Crespo, S.; Cortes, O.; Garcia, C.; Perez, L. Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2008, 32, 295–298. [CrossRef]
- Gambarini, G.; Miccoli, G.; Seracchiani, M.; Morese, A.; Piasecki, L.; Gaimari, G.; Di Nardo, D.; Testarelli, L. Fatigue Resistance of New and Used Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments: A Comparative Study. Clin. Ter. 2018, 169, e96–e101. [CrossRef]
- Spili, P.; Parashos, P.; Messer, H. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J. Endod. 2005, 31, 845-850. [CrossRef]
- Alapati, S.B.; Brantley, W.A.; Svec, T.A.; Powers, J.M.; Nusstein, J.M.; Daehn, G.S. SEM observations of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments that fractured during clinical Use. J. Endod. 2005, 31, 40–43. [CrossRef]
- Parashos, P.; Gordon, I.; Messer, H.H. Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. J. Endod. 2004, 30, 722–725. [CrossRef]
- Arens, F.C.; Hoen, M.M.; Steiman, H.R.; Dietz, G.C Jr. Evaluation of single-use rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J. Endod. 2003, 29, 664–666. [CrossRef]
- Caballero-Flores, H.; Nabeshima, C.K.; Binotto, E.; Machado, M.E. Fracture incidence of instruments from a single-file reciprocating system by students in an endodontic graduate programme: a cross-sectional retrospective study. Int. Endod. J. 2019, 52, 13-18. [CrossRef]
- Capar, I.D.; Arslan, H. A review of instrumentation kinematics of engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments. Int. Endod. J. 2016, 49, 119-135. [CrossRef]
- Lopes, H.P; Elias, C.N; Vieira, M.V; Vieira, V.T; de Souza, L.C; Dos Santos, A.L. Influence of surface roughness on the fatigue life of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments. J. Endod. 2016, 42, 965-968. [CrossRef]
- Zupanc, J.; Vahdat-Pajouh, N.; Schäfer, E. New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys - a review. Int. Endod. J. 2018, 51, 1088-1103. [CrossRef]
- Di Nardo, D.; Galli, M.; Morese, A.; Seracchiani, M.; Ferri, V.; Miccoli, G.; Gambarini, G.; Testarelli, L. A comparative study of mechanical resistance of two reciprocating files. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2019, 11, e231–e235. [CrossRef]
- Higuera, O.; Plotino, G.; Tocci, L.; Carrillo, G.; Gambarini, G.; Jaramillo, D.E. Cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 different nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments in artificial canals. J. Endod. 2015, 41, 913–915. [CrossRef]
- Plotino, G.; Giansiracusa Rubini, A.; Grande, N.M.; Testarelli, L.; Gambarini, G. Cutting efficiency of reciproc and waveone reciprocating instruments. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 1228–1230. [CrossRef]
- Gambarini, G.; Miccoli, G.; Seracchiani, M.; Khrenova, T.; Donfrancesco, O.; D’Angelo, M.; Galli, M.; Di Nardo, D.; Testarelli, L. Role of the Flat-Designed Surface in Improving the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Endodontic NiTi Rotary Instruments. Materials 2019, 12, 2523. [CrossRef]
- Gambarini, G.; Cicconetti, A.; Di Nardo, D.; Miccoli, G.; Zanza, A.; Testarelli, L.; Seracchiani, M. Influence of Different Heat Treatments on Torsional and Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Nickel–Titanium Rotary Files: A Comparative Study. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5604. [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, R.H.; Abdelrahman, A.M; Sharaf, A.A. Evaluation of rotary file system (Kedo-S-Square) in root canal preparation of primary anterior teeth using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-in vitro study. BMC Oral Health, 2022, 22, 13. [CrossRef]
- Lakshimi, L.; Ganesh, J.; Prabhadevi, C.M.; Satish, V. Fracture Incidence of Kedo-S Square Pediatric Rotary Files: A Prospective Clinical Study. Eur. J. Dent. 2022, 16, 594–598. [CrossRef]
- Katge, F.; Chimata, V.K.; Poojari, M.; Shetty, S.; Rusawat, B. Comparison of cleaning efficacy and instrumentation time between rotary and manual instrumentation techniques in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2016, 9, 124–127. [CrossRef]
- Ochoa-Romero, T.; Mendez-Gonzalez, V.; Flores-Reyes, H.; Pozos-Guillen, A.J. Comparison between rotary and manual techniques on duration of instrumentation and obturation times in primary teeth. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2011, 35, 359–363. [CrossRef]
- Plotino, G.; Grande, N.M.; Cotti, E.; Testarelli, L.; Gambarini, G. Blue treatment enhances cyclic fatigue resistance of vortex nickel-titanium rotary files. Instruments. J Endod. 2014, 40, 1451-1453. [CrossRef]
- Pruett, J.P.; Clement, D.J.; Carnes, D.L. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1997; 23: 77-85.
- Martins, J.N.R.; Silva, E.J.N.L.; Marques, D.; Pereira, M.R.; Ginjeira, A.; Silva, R.J.C.; Fernandes, F.M.B.; Versiani, M.A. Mechanical Performance and Metallurgical Features of ProTaper Universal and 6 Replica like Systems. J. Endod. 2020, 46, 1884–1893. [CrossRef]
- Dablanca-Blanco, A.-B.; Castelo-Baz, P.; Miguéns-Vila, R.; Álvarez-Novoa, P.; Martín-Biedma, B. Endodontic Rotary Files, What Should an Endodontist Know? Medicina 2022, 58, 719. [CrossRef]
- Alowi, W.A.; Maganur, P.C.; Manoharan, V.; Jeevanandan, G.; Mawkili, L.K.; Alsam, S.M.; Faris, S.M.; Vishwanathaiah, S. Knowledge and Practice of Rotary Instrumentation in Primary Teeth among Saudi Arabian Dentists: A Cross-sectional Study. Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2022, 15, S97–S102. [CrossRef]
- Jeevanandan, G. Kedo S paediatric rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth—case report. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017, 11, ZR03–ZR05. [CrossRef]
- Chauhan, A.; Saini, S.; Dua, P.; Mangla, R. Rotary endodontics in pediatric dentistry: embracing the new alternative. Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2019, 12, 460–463. [CrossRef]
- Locke, M.; Thomas, M.B.; Dummer, P.M.H. A survey of adoption of endodontic nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation part 1: general dental practitioners in Wales. Br. Dent. J. 2013, 214, E6. [CrossRef]
- Jeepalyam, S.; Nirmala, S.V.S.G.; Nuvvula, S. Efficacy of Two Paediatric Rotary Systems: Kedo-SG Blue and Prime Pedo Files in Primary Mandibular Molars: A Randomised Clinical Trial. J Clin Dent Res. 2024, 36-41. [CrossRef]
- Ungerechts, C.; Bardsen, A.; Fristad, I. Instrument fracture in root canals—where, why, when and what? A study from a student clinic. Int. Endod. J. 2014, 47, 183–190. [CrossRef]
- Alfouzan, K.; Jamleh, A. Fracture of nickel titanium rotary instrument during root canal treatment and re-treatment: A 5-year retrospective study. Int. Endod. J. 2018, 51, 157–163. [CrossRef]
- Plotino, G.; Grande, N.M.; Cordaro, M.; Testarelli, L.; Gambarini, G. A review of cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2009, 35, 1469-1476. [CrossRef]
- Silva, E.J.N.L.; Giraldes, J.F.N.; de Lima, C.O.; Vieira, V.T.L.; Elias, C.N.; Antunes, H.S. Influence of heat treatment on torsional resistance and surface roughness of nickel-titanium instruments. Int. Endod. J. 2019, 52, 1645–1651. [CrossRef]
- Sandino-Lacayo K.L.; Vega-González, M.; Soza-Bolaños, A.I.; Herrera-Alaniz, L.C.; Al Omari, T.; Domínguez Pérez, R.A. Cyclic fatigue resistance of two pediatric rotary files manufactured with different heat treatments: an in-vitro study. J Clin Pediatr. Dent. 2024, 48, 102-109. [CrossRef]
- Ajinkya, M.P.; Unmesh, K.; Shivani, M.; Kashmira, S.; Ricardo, M.; Gianluca, P.; Alexander, M.L.; Simy, M.; Musab, H.S.; Krishna, P.S. Cyclic Fatigue, Torsional Resistance, and Angular Deflection of Two Heat-Treated Files: M-Wire Versus New F-Wire Technology. Metals 2020, 10, 1359. https://doi.org.10.3390/met10101359.
- Gao, Y.; Shotton, V.; Wilkinson, K.; Phillips, G.; Johnson, W.B. Effects of raw material and rotational speed on the cyclic fatigue of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments. J. Endod. 2010, 36, 1205–1209. [CrossRef]
- De-Deus, G.; Vieira, V.T.; da Silva, E.J.; Lopes, H.; Elias, C.N.; Moreira, E.J. Bending resistance and dynamic and static cyclic fatigue life of Reciproc and Wave One large instruments. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 575–579. [CrossRef]
- Palma, P.J.; Messias, A.; Cerqueira, A.R.; Tavares, L.D.; Caramelo, F.; Roseiro, L.; Santos, J.M. Cyclic fatigue resistance of three rotary file systems in a dynamic model after immersion in sodium hypochlorite. Odontology 2019, 107, 324–332. [CrossRef]
- Keles, A.; Eymirli, A.; Uyanık, O.; Nagas, E. Influence of static and dynamic cyclic fatigue tests on the lifespan of four reciprocating systems at different temperatures. Int. Endod. J. 2019, 52, 880–886. [CrossRef]
- Sousa, J.; Basto, J.; Roseiro, L.; Messias, A.; dos Santos, J.M.; Palma, P. Evaluation of the cyclic fatigue of 3 file systems used in mechanized instrumentation. Port. J. Stomatol. Dent. Med. Maxillofac. Surg. 2015, 56, 239–245.
- Vieira, T.M.; Cardoso, R.M.; Alves, N.C.C.; et al. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Blue Heat-Treated Instruments at Different Temperatures. Int J Biomater. 2021, 2021, 5584766. [CrossRef]
- Elnaghy, A.M.; Elsaka, S.E. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of One Curve, 2Shape, ProFile Vortex, Vortex Blue, and RaCe Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Single and Double Curvature Canals. J. Endod. 2018, 44, 1725–1730. [CrossRef]
- Sharroufna, R.; Mashyakhy, M. The Effect of Multiple Autoclave Sterilization on the Cyclic Fatigue of Three Heat-Treated Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files: EdgeFile X7, Vortex Blue, and TRUShape. BioMed. Res. int. 2020, 2020, 8826069. [CrossRef]
- Gambarini, G.; Galli, M.; Seracchiani, M.; Di Nardo, D.; Versiani, M.A.; Piasecki, L.; Testarelli, L. In Vivo Evaluation of Operative Torque Generated by Two Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments during Root Canal Preparation. Eur. J. Dent. 2019, 13, 556–562. [CrossRef]
- Özyürek, H.; Elbay, M.; Özyürek T. Assessment the impact of operator experience on cyclic fatigue resistance in reciprocating and rotary NiTi files: a comparative study between dental students and pediatric dentistry specialists. Front. Mater. 2023, 10, 1224938. https://doi.org.10.3389/fmats.2023.1224938.
- Surme, K.; Akman, H.; Özkan, H.B. et al. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of four pediatric rotary file systems at body temperature: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2024, 24, 992. [CrossRef]
- Iqbal, M.K.; Kohli, M.R.; Kim, J.S. A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: A PennEndo database study. J. Endod. 2006, 32, 1048–1052. [CrossRef]
- Terauchi. Y.; O'Leary, L.; Kikuchi, I.; Asanagi, M.; Yoshioka, T.; Kobayashi, C.; Suda, H. Evaluation of the efficiency of a new file removal system in comparison with two conventional systems. J. Endod. 2007, 33, 585-588. [CrossRef]




| Kolmogorov-Smirnov | Shapiro-Wilk | ||||||
| Group | Statistic | df | Sig | Statistic | df | Sig | |
| A | .122 | 30 | .200* | .939 | 30 | .077 | |
| NCF | B | .264 | 30 | .000 | .757 | 30 | .000 |
| C | .207 | 30 | .002 | .808 | 30 | .000 | |
| D | .246 | 30 | .000 | .775 | 30 | .000 | |
| Group | n | Mean with Std. Dev | Median | Inter quartile range |
| A | 30 | 697.01 ± 420.09 | 645.33 | 600.15 |
| B | 30 | 661.76 ± 655.09 | 386.47 | 721.28 |
| C | 30 | 203.88 ± 155.46 | 161.33 | 116.38 |
| D | 30 | 976.90 ± 1085.19 | 414.19 | 576.25 |
| Group | Groups | Mean difference | Z | P |
| A | B | 35.25 | 1.373 | 0.17 |
| C | 493.13 | 5.392 | <0.001 *** | |
| D | -279.88 | 0.592 | 0.554 | |
| B | C | 457.87 | 4.210 | <0.001 *** |
| D | -315.14 | 0.627 | 0.531 | |
| C | D | -773.02 | 4.259 | <0.001 *** |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
