Submitted:
10 March 2025
Posted:
11 March 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. Literature Research and Result
3.1. Theoretical Background

3.2. Conflict Management Strategies (CMS) in Supply Chains
CMS in the Context of Jordan’s Food Manufacturing Sector
| Category | Description | Importance in Supply Chain | Relevance in Jordan's Food Manufacturing Sector | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduction to CMS | Strategies pivotal for navigating supply chain complexities, enhancing efficiency, and improving stakeholder relationships. | Vital for resolving disagreements, improving operational processes, and boosting overall performance. | Essential for managing complexities and conflicts arising from internal and external factors, crucial for the sector's sustainability and growth. | Huo, He, & Tian, 2023; Durugbo & Al-Balushi, 2023; Murad et al., 2021; Alshawabkeh et al., 2022; Saleheen & Habib, 2022 |
| Collaboration | Parties work jointly, sharing resources, knowledge, and capabilities for mutually beneficial outcomes. | Mitigates risks, enhances efficiency, fosters innovation, and strengthens relationships. | Instrumental for facing challenges like resource scarcity, geopolitical influences, and global market fluctuations. Enhances resource utilization and risk mitigation. | Delak & Širok, 2022; Sanjaya, Suartama, & Suastika, 2022; Baah et al., 2022; Cheek & Hamrin, 2023; Alsaad, Yousif, & AlJedaiah, 2018; Cao & Zhang, 2011 |
| Accommodation | One side willingly compromises, prioritizing others' concerns and preferences. | Preserves harmonious relationships, where stakeholder dynamics are disparate, and conflicting issues are non-central to outcomes. | Vital for navigating various stakeholder expectations and regulatory frameworks, fortifying relationships, and ensuring a reliable supply chain. | A. L. Diab et al., 2022; Martins et al., 2020; Maiti & Choi, 2021; B. Obeidat, 2022; Obeidat & Hamadneh, 2022 |
| Avoidance | Deliberate disengagement from conflicts, neither addressing nor confronting the issue. | Practical for bypassing disruptions unrelated to core operations, preserving operational flow, and avoiding unnecessary strain. | Essential for maneuvering socio-political and economic conflicts, acting as a buffer against potential disruptions and maintaining consistent internal operations. | Huo et al., 2023; Min et al., 2020; Abdallah et al., 2014; Rahim, 2023 |
| Compromise | A mutual give-and-take approach to establish an acceptable solution, relinquishing certain stances. | Ensures smooth operations amidst disagreements, finding a middle ground in disputes essential for process continuity. | Prominent in managing diverse stakeholder interests, stabilizing supply chain segments, and maintaining operational flow without significant sacrifice. | Noermijati et al., 2019; Behfar, Peterson, Mannix, & Trochim, 2008; Macieira, Barbosa, & Teixeira, 2021 |
| Competition | High concern for one’s interests over others, potentially leading to win-lose outcomes. | Can drive efficiency and innovation but may lead to conflicts if not managed adeptly, especially when resources are scarce or objectives conflict. | Influences stakeholder negotiations and operational priorities, requiring adept management to prevent potential negative consequences like strained relationships. | Rahim, 2023; Boz Semerci, 2019; Chen et al., 2017 |
| CMS in Jordan's Food Sector | Essential for managing diverse challenges within the food sector's supply chain, influenced by various internal and external factors. | Critical for managing discrepancies in interests, objectives, and operational preferences among stakeholders. | Intensified need for adept CMS due to socio-economic and geopolitical challenges, ensuring stability and efficiency within the supply chain. | Hundaileh & Fayad, 2019; Al-Hamdan et al., 2019; Shareef et al., 2022; T. Wang et al., 2021 |
3.3. Comparative Discussion: CMS in Developed vs. Emerging Economies
| CMS Strategy | Jordan (Emerging Market) | UAE (Advanced SCM Tech) | Singapore (Regulated SCM) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collaboration | Relationship-based trust | AI-driven coordination | Government-mandated SCM rules |
| Avoidance | Conflict avoidance due to business risks | Rare due to strict compliance | Penalized under strict SCM policies |
| Competition | Dominant retailers enforce strict supplier terms | Strong government price controls | Competitive SCM innovation |
| Compromise | Informal negotiation tactics | Formalized dispute resolution | Arbitration frameworks exist |
| Accommodation | Supplier-driven flexibility due to power imbalances | Buyer-driven due to strict standards | Legally enforced SCM contracts |
| CMS Strategy | Jordan (Emerging Market) Outcomes | UAE Outcomes | Singapore Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collaboration | Increased supplier loyalty, slower tech adoption Faster | Faster order fulfillment, AI-based collaboration | Highly efficient dispute resolution, regulatory enforcement |
| Avoidance | Supplier retention but higher supply risks | Risk minimization via tech-driven solutions | Conflict escalation prevention due to strict laws |
| Competition | Cost pressures on suppliers, market fragmentation | Government intervention, stabilized pricing | Competitive advantage through innovation |
| Compromise | Flexible but inconsistent SCM performance | Legal frameworks ensure enforceability | High compliance, standardized negotiations |
| Accommodation | Power imbalances, reactive | Balanced SCM relationships | Institutionalized supplier protection laws |
3.4. Supply Chain Operational Processes (SCOP)
Production Planning
Inventory Management
Distribution
Logistics
The Mediating Role of SCOP in CMS → SCP Relationship
| Supply Chain Operational Process | How It Mediates CMS → SCP | Examples of CMS Influence |
|---|---|---|
| Production Planning | Aligns production schedules with stakeholder expectations to reduce demand fluctuations | Collaboration CMS: Joint production planning enhances supply chain agility (Sarkis et al., 2022) |
| Inventory Management | Balances stock availability to mitigate supply chain disruptions | Avoidance CMS: Poor communication leads to stock shortages (Christopher & Holweg, 2017) |
| Distribution | Optimizes transportation and last-mile delivery, reducing delays | Competitive CMS: Power asymmetries increase lead times for smaller suppliers (Ketchen & Hult, 2021) |
| Logistics | Enhances resilience through technology-driven coordination | Compromise CMS: Shared logistics resources lower transportation costs (Prajogo et al., 2022) |
SCOP within Jordan’s Socio-Economic Context
| Supply Chain Operational Process | Description | Key Points | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | The backbone of the food manufacturing sector, crucial for efficient and effective production, storage, and delivery to meet consumer demand. | - Nuanced due to perishable products. - Requires efficient strategies for production, inventory, distribution, and logistics. |
Saragih et al., 2020; Aung & Chang, 2014; Gupta & Jain, 2013; Krajewski & Malhotra, 2022; Mollenkopf, Ozanne, & Stolze, 2021 |
| Production Planning | Ensures items are created efficiently, deciding what to make, its volume, and production timing. Tackles challenges like changing demand and resource limits. | - Influences supply chain performance metrics. - Essential in resolving supply chain disagreements. |
Han, Lee, & Kim, 2019; Jum’a et al., 2021; Stadtler, 2014; Jaber, Marahleh, & Dalabeeh, 2019; Abu-Rumman et al., 2023 |
| Inventory Management | Oversight of non-capitalized assets, stock items, and inventory levels. Balances costs with the benefits of meeting demand. | - Linked to product quality and waste minimization. - Techniques like JIT and EOQ are crucial. |
Becerra et al., 2021; Diab, Al-Bourini, & Abu-Rumman, 2015; Pan & Nagi, 2020; Hiassat, Diabat, & Rahwan, 2017; Al-Hamdan et al., 2019 |
| Distribution | Strategic dissemination of products from manufacturers to consumers. Involves logistical and strategic endeavors affecting performance and relationships. | - Essential for maintaining product freshness and quality. - Mitigates stakeholder conflicts through reliable delivery. |
Dwivedi, Amin, & Vollala, 2020; Randrianarisoa & Gillen, 2022 |
| Logistics | Coordinated management of movement and storage of goods in the supply chain. Ensures seamless operation amidst various challenges. | - Minimizes costs, optimizes efficiency. - Influences performance and stakeholder satisfaction. |
Gligor & Holcomb, 2012; Kim et al., 2020 |
| SCOP in Jordan’s Context | Influenced by geopolitical, economic, and stakeholder complexities. Necessitates resilient processes for optimal performance. | - Integration with conflict management strategies is crucial. - Must be adaptive and aligned with socio-economic factors. |
Abu-Rumman et al., 2023; Christoforidou et al., 2023; Hundaileh & Fayad, 2019; Huo et al., 2023; Shareef et al., 2022; Schuetze & Hussein, 2023; Qtaishat et al., 2023 |
3.5. Customer-Centric Green Supply Chain Management (CCGSCM) as a Strategic Sustainability Mediator
3.6. Supply Chain Performance (SCP) Outcomes
Detailed Exploration of Each Measure of SCP
- (1)
- Cost of Supply Chain
- (2)
- Quality of Supply Chain
- (3)
- Responsiveness in Supply Chain
- (4)
- Flexibility in Supply Chain
- (5)
- SCP in Jordan's Food Manufacturing Industry
| Section | Summary | References |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction to SCP Metrics and Importance | SCP is critical for assessing supply chain efficiency and effectiveness, impacting competitive advantage and customer satisfaction. It's crucial in the food sector due to product perishability, quality standards, and logistical challenges. | Ka, Ab, & Lb, 2019; Christopher, 2022 |
| Cost of Supply Chain | Managing costs within the SCP is essential for profitability, requiring strategic planning, especially in food manufacturing. External factors like geopolitical issues and resource scarcity significantly influence cost management. | Seuring & Müller, 2008; Beithou et al., 2022; K. Khan et al., 2021 |
| Quality of Supply Chain | Quality in SCP goes beyond product excellence, requiring adherence to safety standards and consistent output, especially under geopolitical and resource challenges in regions like Jordan. | Pham & Doan, 2020; Mazzawi & Alawamleh, 2019 |
| Responsiveness in Supply Chain | Responsiveness in SCP involves meeting market demands promptly, crucial for customer loyalty and brand image, especially in conflict-prone regions. CMS impact on responsiveness is notable. | Gligor & Holcomb, 2012; Rahim, 2023 |
| Flexibility in Supply Chain | SCP flexibility refers to adapting to disruptions and market variations, vital in volatile sectors like food manufacturing in Jordan. CMS play a key role in maintaining operational adaptability. | Piprani et al., 2022; Al-Hawary et al., 2017 |
| SCP in Jordan's Food Manufacturing Industry | SCP's efficiency in Jordan's food sector is vital for national economic stability and food security, facing challenges due to reliance on imports and various conflicts. Effective CMS is essential for enhancing SCP amidst these challenges. | Jum’a, 2023; Abu Nimeh et al., 2018 |
3.7. Tactical Pillars for Constructing Green Supply Chain Resilience in Food Manufacturing
- (1)
- Relationship Characteristics – Power Dynamics
- (2)
- Long-term Relationship and Conflict Intensity
| Section | Subsection | Description | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relationship Characteristics – Power Dynamics | Introduction to Power Dynamics in Supply Chains | Power dynamics refer to the asymmetrical influence among entities in supply chains, with some organizations having significant control over terms, decisions, and resources. | V. Sharma et al., 2023 |
| Types and Sources of Power in Supply Chains | Various types of power exist, including coercive, reward, legitimate, referent, and expert power, each arising from unique sources and affecting entities differently. | Reimann & Ketchen Jr, 2017 | |
| Relevance of Power Dynamics in Conflict Management | Power dynamics critically influence conflict management strategies in supply chains, with powerful entities enforcing strategies that can range from collaboration to competition. | Li et al., 2020; Ghosh & Eriksson, 2019 | |
| Relevance of Power Dynamics in SCOP and SCP | Power dynamics affect operational decisions in supply chains, such as production strategies and inventory management, thereby impacting overall productivity. | Chamanara, Goldstein, & Newell, 2023; Li et al., 2020 | |
| Power Dynamics in Jordan's Food Manufacturing Sector | In Jordan's food industry, power dynamics are influenced by factors like market dominance, resource control, and global reach, affecting pricing, quality, and delivery decisions. | Yoo & Seo, 2017; V. Sharma et al., 2023 | |
| Conflict Characteristics - Long-term Relationship and Conflict Intensity | Long-term Relationship and Conflict Intensity: An Overview | Long-standing relationships and conflict intensity are key in understanding stakeholder interactions within supply chains, involving elements of cooperation, shared benefits, and goal alignment. | Al-Omoush, Palacios-Marques, & Ulrich, 2022; Yoo & Seo, 2017 |
| Relevance of Long-term Relationships in Conflict Management | Long-term relationships contribute to a culture of trust and mutual reliance, reducing conflicts and encouraging collaborative problem-solving. | A. M. Obeidat, 2022 | |
| Conflict Intensity and Its Implications | The severity of conflicts influences the choice of management strategy, with high-intensity conflicts necessitating structured resolution methods. | Jum’a, 2023 | |
| Conflict Characteristics within Jordan's Food Manufacturing Sector | In Jordan, long-term partnerships are crucial for supply chain stability, whereas conflict intensity, influenced by various operational factors, requires careful management to preserve business relationships. | Zureiqat & Ostermeier, 2022; Al-Hyari, 2023 |
3.8. Accounting for Contextual Influences: The Role of Control Variables
4. Discussion
| CMS Strategy | Smart City Relevance | Relevant SDGs |
| Collaboration | IoT-enabled transparency & coordination | SDG 9, SDG 11, SDG 17 |
| Accommodation | Technology-driven regulatory compliance | SDG 16, SDG 17 |
| Avoidance | Digital risk monitoring | SDG 9, SDG 12 |
| Compromise | Smart logistics sharing | SDG 11, SDG 17 |
| Competition | Blockchain-driven fair competition | SDG 9, SDG 12 |
5. Conclusion
Ethics & Funding Statements
Funding Statement
References
- Abaddi, S.; AL-Shboul, M.d.A. “Revealing the hidden”–challenges facing early digital entrepreneurs in Jordan. Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review 2023.
- Abdallah, A.B.; Obeidat, B.Y.; Aqqad, N.O. The impact of supply chain management practices on supply chain performance in Jordan: The moderating effect of competitive intensity. Int. Bus. Res. 2014, 7, 13. [Google Scholar]
- Abu-Rumman, A.; AlSha’ar, H.; Alqhaiwi, L.A.; Al Shraah, A. Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities of Implementing Industry 4.0 in Jordan: Public Shareholding Manufacturing Companies Perspective. Wireless Personal Communications 2023, 1-19.
- Abu Nimeh, H.; Abdallah, A.B.; Sweis, R. Lean supply chain management practices and performance: empirical evidence from manufacturing companies. Int. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2018, 7, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Dmour, H.; Al Hasan, R.; Thneibat, M.; Masa’deh, R.e.; Alkhadra, W.; Al-Dmour, R.; Alalwan, A. Integrated model for the factors determining the academic’s remote working productivity and engagement: Empirical study. Sage Open 2023, 13, 21582440231194393. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Hawary, S.I.S.; Mohammad, A.S.; Mohammad, A.A.S.; Alsarahni, A.H.H. Supply chain flexibility aspects and their impact on customers satisfaction of pharmaceutical industry in Jordan. Int. J. Bus. Perform. Supply Chain Model. 2017, 9, 326–343. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Hyari, K. The determinants of export performance of Jordanian SMEs: a comparative perspective. Int. J. Bus. Glob. 2023, 34, 174–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Omoush, K.S.; Palacios-Marques, D.; Ulrich, K. The impact of intellectual capital on supply chain agility and collaborative knowledge creation in responding to unprecedented pandemic crises. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2022, 178, 121603. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Hamdan, Z.; Adnan Al-Ta'amneh, I.; Rayan, A.; Bawadi, H. The impact of emotional intelligence on conflict management styles used by Jordanian nurse managers. J. Nurs. Manag. 2019, 27, 560–566. [Google Scholar]
- Almasri, A.; Ying, M. Adopting Circular Economy Principles: How Do Conflict Management Strategies Help Adopt Smart Technology in Jordanian SMEs? Sustainability 2024, 16, 9475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aloun, D.M. (2024). International Trade Standards in Jordanian Legislation.
- Alsaad, A.K.; Yousif, K.J.; AlJedaiah, M.N. Collaboration: the key to gain value from IT in supply chain. EuroMed J. Bus. 2018, 13, 214–235. [Google Scholar]
- Alshawabkeh, R.; AL-Awamleh, H.; Alkhawaldeh, M.; Kanaan, R.; Al-Hawary, S.; Mohammad, A.; Alkhawalda, R. The mediating role of supply chain management on the relationship between big data and supply chain performance using SCOR model. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2022, 10, 729–736. [Google Scholar]
- Andreoni, A.; Chang, H.-J. The political economy of industrial policy: Structural interdependencies, policy alignment and conflict management. Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 2019, 48, 136–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aung, M.M.; Chang, Y.S. Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives. Food Control 2014, 39, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baah, C.; Opoku Agyeman, D.; Acquah, I.S.K.; Agyabeng-Mensah, Y.; Afum, E.; Issau, K.; Ofori, D.; Faibil, D. Effect of information sharing in supply chains: understanding the roles of supply chain visibility, agility, collaboration on supply chain performance. Benchmarking: Int. J. 2022, 29, 434–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babeker, A.; Ahmed, A.; Ahmed, A.; Ebrahiem, M. Assessment of the extent implementing the Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) and Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point System (HACCP) in Sudan sugar industry factories. J Agric Sc Food Technol 2021, 7, 368–373. [Google Scholar]
- Becerra, P.; Mula, J.; Sanchis, R. Green supply chain quantitative models for sustainable inventory management: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 328, 129544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behfar, K.J.; Peterson, R.S.; Mannix, E.A.; Trochim, W.M. The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 2008, 93, 170. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Behroozi, F.; Monfared, M.; Hosseini, S.M.H. Investigating the conflicts between different stakeholders’ preferences in a blood supply chain at emergencies: a trade-off between six objectives. Soft Comput. 2021, 25, 13389–13410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beithou, N.; Qandil, A.; Khalid, M.B.; Horvatinec, J.; Ondrasek, G. Review of Agricultural-Related Water Security in Water-Scarce Countries: Jordan Case Study. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blau, P.M. Social exchange. Int. Encycl. Soc. Sci. 1968, 7, 452–457. [Google Scholar]
- Bondigas, A. (2022). The Importance of Project Planning in Industrial Settings. Chron. Retrieved 1 October from https://smallbusiness.chron.com/organizational-project-management-skills-78288.html.
- Boz Semerci, A. Examination of knowledge hiding with conflict, competition and personal values. Int. J. Confl. Manag. 2019, 30, 111–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, M.; Zhang, Q. Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. J. Oper. Manag. 2011, 29, 163–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caputo, A. Religious motivation, nepotism and conflict management in Jordan. Int. J. Confl. Manag. 2018, 29, 146–166. [Google Scholar]
- Chamanara, S.; Goldstein, B.P.; Newell, J.P. Power asymmetries in supply chains and implications for environmental governance: a study of the beef industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Chavez, R.; Yu, W.; Feng, M.; Wiengarten, F. The effect of customer-centric green supply chain management on operational performance and customer satisfaction. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2016, 25, 205–220. [Google Scholar]
- Christoforidou, M.; Borghuis, G.; Seijger, C.; van Halsema, G.E.; Hellegers, P. Food security under water scarcity: a comparative analysis of Egypt and Jordan. Food Secur. 2023, 15, 171–185. [Google Scholar]
- Christopher, M. (2022). Logistics and supply chain management. Pearson Uk.
- Coser, L.A. Sociological theory from the Chicago dominance to 1965. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 1976, 2, 145–160. [Google Scholar]
- Dang, C.; Li, Z.F.; Yang, C. Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. J. Bank. Financ. 2018, 86, 159–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delak, B.; Širok, K. Physician–nurse conflict resolution styles in primary health care. Nurs. Open 2022, 9, 1077–1085. [Google Scholar]
- Demirel, S.; Kapuscinski, R.; Yu, M. Strategic behavior of suppliers in the face of production disruptions [Article]. Manag. Sci. 2018, 64, 533–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denyer, D.; Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review.
- Diab, A.L.; Pabbajah, M.; Nurina Widyanti, R.; Muthalib, L.M.; Fajar Widyatmoko, W. Accommodation of local wisdom in conflict resolution of Indonesia’s urban society. Cogent Soc. Sci. 2022, 8, 2153413. [Google Scholar]
- Diab, S.M.; Al-Bourini, F.A.; Abu-Rumman, A.H. The impact of green supply chain management practices on organizational performance: a study of Jordanian food industries. J. Mgmt. Sustain. 2015, 5, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubey, R.; Gunasekaran, A.; Bryde, D.J.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Papadopoulos, T. Blockchain technology for enhancing swift-trust, collaboration and resilience within a humanitarian supply chain setting. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 3381–3398. [Google Scholar]
- Durach, C.F.; Glasen, P.C.; Straube, F. Disruption causes and disruption management in supply chains with Chinese suppliers: Managing cultural differences. International Journal of Physical Distribution Logistics Management 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Durugbo, C.M.; Al-Balushi, Z. Supply chain management in times of crisis: a systematic review. Manag. Rev. Q. 2023, 73, 1179–1235. [Google Scholar]
- Dwivedi, S.K.; Amin, R.; Vollala, S. Blockchain based secured information sharing protocol in supply chain management system with key distribution mechanism. J. Inf. Secur. Appl. 2020, 54, 102554. [Google Scholar]
- Emerson, R.M. (1977). Rational Choice and Social Exchange: A Critique of Exchange Theory. In: JSTOR.
- Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
- Ghosh, R.; Eriksson, M. Food waste due to retail power in supply chains: Evidence from Sweden. Glob. Food Secur. 2019, 20, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Gligor, D.M.; Holcomb, M.C. Understanding the role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Manag. : Int. J. 2012, 17, 438–453. [Google Scholar]
- Güçlü, İ. Karl Marx and Ralf Dahrendorf: A comparative perspective on class formation and conflict. Eskişehir Osman. Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilim. Derg. 2014, 9, 151–168. [Google Scholar]
- Gunasekaran, A.; Patel, C.; Tirtiroglu, E. Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2001, 21, 71–87. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, S.; Jain, S.K. A literature review of lean manufacturing. Int. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Manag. 2013, 8, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gusenbauer, M.; Haddaway, N.R. Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Res. Synth. Methods 2020, 11, 181–217. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Han, J.-H.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kim, Y.-D. Production planning in a two-level supply chain for production-time-dependent products with dynamic demands. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 135, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haraguchi, M.; Lall, U. Flood risks and impacts: A case study of Thailand’s floods in 2011 and research questions for supply chain decision making. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2015, 14, 256–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hiassat, A.; Diabat, A.; Rahwan, I. A genetic algorithm approach for location-inventory-routing problem with perishable products. J. Manuf. Syst. 2017, 42, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hundaileh, L.; Fayad, F. (2019). Jordan’s Food Processing Sector Analysis and Strategy for Sectoral Improvement. Giz Jordan. Retrieved 2 October from https://www.giz.de/en/downloads/Jordan%20Food%20Processing%20Sector%20Analysis%20and%20Strategy%20for%20Sectoral%20Improvement.pdf.
- Hunter, J.E.; Schmidt, F.L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage.
- Huo, B.; He, H.; Tian, M. Conflict management strategies and their relationships with exchange performance in supply chains. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huo, B.; He, H.; Tian, M. Conflict management strategies and their relationships with exchange performance in supply chains. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2023, 53, 1217–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huo, B.; He, H.; Tian, M. Conflict management strategies and their relationships with exchange performance in supply chains. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2023, 53, 1217–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IMCO Software. (2023). The Importance of Long-Term Planning in Manufacturing. Imcosoftware. Retrieved 1 October from https://www.imcosoftware.com/the-importance-of-long-term-planning-in-manufacturing/.
- Irfan, M.; Wang, M. Data-driven capabilities, supply chain integration and competitive performance: Evidence from the food and beverages industry in Pakistan. Br. Food J. 2019, 121, 2708–2729. [Google Scholar]
- Ivanov, D. Lean resilience: AURA (Active Usage of Resilience Assets) framework for post-COVID-19 supply chain management. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2022, 33, 1196–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaber, J.O.; Marahleh, G.; Dalabeeh, A. Emissions reduction resulting from renewable energy projects in Jordan. J. Energy Technol. Policy 2019, 9, 42–51. [Google Scholar]
- Jarrah, M. Total quality management and the role in developing supply chain management in Jordan companies. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2023, 11, 737–742. [Google Scholar]
- Jum’a, L. The role of blockchain-enabled supply chain applications in improving supply chain performance: the case of Jordanian manufacturing sector. Management Research Review 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Jum’a, L.; Zimon, D.; Ikram, M. A relationship between supply chain practices, environmental sustainability and financial performance: evidence from manufacturing companies in Jordan. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ka, J.M.R.; Ab, N.R.; Lb, K. A review on supply chain performance measurement systems. Procedia Manuf 2019, 30, 40–47. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, K.; Su, C.-W.; Tao, R.; Umar, M. How do geopolitical risks affect oil prices and freight rates? Ocean Coastal Management 2021, 215, 105955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.T.; Lee, H.-H.; Hwang, T. Logistics integration in the supply chain: a resource dependence theory perspective. Int. J. Qual. Innov. 2020, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kittipanya-Ngam, P.; Tan, K.H. A framework for food supply chain digitalization: lessons from Thailand. Prod. Plan. Control 2020, 31, 158–172. [Google Scholar]
- Krajewski, L.J.; Malhotra, M.K. (2022). Operations management: Processes and supply chains. Pearson.
- Krampe, E. Syria, Palestine, and Jordan: Case Studies in Water Scarcity, Conflict, and Migration. Maneto Undergraduate Research Journal 2020, 3. [Google Scholar]
- Kshetri, N. 1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 39, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Shao, J.; Zhu, S.X. Impacts of power dynamics and gray markets on supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 222, 107488. [Google Scholar]
- Macieira, A.; Barbosa, J.; Teixeira, P. Food safety in local farming of fruits and vegetables. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manzini, R.; Accorsi, R. The new conceptual framework for food supply chain assessment. J. Food Eng. 2013, 115, 251–263. [Google Scholar]
- Martins, M.M.; Trindade, L. d. L.; Vandresen, L.; Amestoy, S.C.; Prata, A.P.; Vilela, C. Conflict management strategies used by Portuguese nurse managers. Revista brasileira de enfermagem 2020, 73. [Google Scholar]
- Marx, K.; Engels, F. (1848). TH E COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. Selected Works bu Karl Marx and Frederick Engels Neu York: International Publishers, 1363.
- Mazzawi, R.; Alawamleh, M. Managing quality within existing supply chains: case studies from Jordan. Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2019, 32, 44–66. [Google Scholar]
- McGahan, A.M. Integrating insights from the resource-based view of the firm into the new stakeholder theory. J. Manag. 2021, 47, 1734–1756. [Google Scholar]
- Min, J.; Iqbal, S.; Khan, M.A.S.; Akhtar, S.; Anwar, F.; Qalati, S.A. Impact of supervisory behavior on sustainable employee performance: Mediation of conflict management strategies using PLS-SEM. PloS One 2020, 15, e0236650. [Google Scholar]
- Mohsen, B.M. Ai-driven optimization of urban logistics in smart cities: Integrating autonomous vehicles and iot for efficient delivery systems. Sustainability 2024, 16, 11265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mollenkopf, D.A.; Ozanne, L.K.; Stolze, H.J. A transformative supply chain response to COVID-19. J. Serv. Manag. 2021, 32, 190–202. [Google Scholar]
- Munn, Z.; Barker, T.H.; Moola, S.; Tufanaru, C.; Stern, C.; McArthur, A.; Stephenson, M.; Aromataris, E. Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid. Synth. 2020, 18, 2127–2133. [Google Scholar]
- Noermijati, N.; Sunaryo, S.; Ratri, I.K. The influence of emotional intelligence on employee performance mediated by cooperative conflict management style of integrating and compromising. J. Apl. Manaj. 2019, 17, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obeidat, A.M. The impact of business intelligence in crisis management: the strategic vigilance as an intermediary variable in Jordanian insurance companies. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 2022, 41, 342–359. [Google Scholar]
- Obeidat, B. Assessing agritourism potential in a Jordanian village based on farmer-specific and location-based factors. Cogent Eng. 2022, 9, 2119531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obeidat, B.; Hamadneh, A. Agritourism-A Sustainable Approach to the Development of Rural Settlements in Jordan: Al-Baqura Village as a Case Study. International Journal of Sustainable Development Planning 2022, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oluyisola, O.E.; Bhalla, S.; Sgarbossa, F.; Strandhagen, J.O. Designing and developing smart production planning and control systems in the industry 4.0 era: a methodology and case study. J. Intell. Manuf. 2022, 33, 311–332. [Google Scholar]
- Pan, F.; Nagi, R. Robust supply chain design under uncertain demand in agile manufacturing. Comput. Oper. Res. 2010, 37, 668–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pfeffer, J.; Salancik, G.R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
- Pham, T.; Doan, T. Supply chain relationship quality, environmental uncertainty, supply chain performance and financial performance of high-tech agribusinesses in Vietnam. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2020, 8, 663–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piprani, A.Z.; Jaafar, N.I.; Ali, S.M.; Mubarik, M.S.; Shahbaz, M. Multi-dimensional supply chain flexibility and supply chain resilience: The role of supply chain risks exposure. Oper. Manag. Res. 2022, 15, 307–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qtaishat, T.; El-Habbab, M.S.; Bumblauskas, D.P.; Tabieh, M. The impact of drought on food security and sustainability in Jordan. GeoJournal 2023, 88, 1389–1400. [Google Scholar]
- Rahim, M.A. (2023). Managing conflict in organizations. Routledge.
- Rahim, M.A.; Buntzman, G.F. Supervisory power bases, styles of handling conflict with subordinates, and subordinate compliance and satisfaction. J. Psychol. 1989, 123, 195–210. [Google Scholar]
- Randrianarisoa, L.M.; Gillen, D. Reducing emissions in international transport: A supply chain perspective. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2022, 102, 103074. [Google Scholar]
- Reimann, F.; Ketchen Jr, D.J. Power in supply chain management. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2017, 53, 3–9. [Google Scholar]
- Rossit, D.A.; Tohmé, F.; Frutos, M. Industry 4.0: smart scheduling. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 3802–3813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleheen, F.; Habib, M.M. Global supply chain disruption management post Covid 19. Am. J. Ind. Bus. Manag. 2022, 12, 376–389. [Google Scholar]
- Sanjaya, D.B.; Suartama, I.K.; Suastika, I.N. The Effect of the Conflict Resolution Learning Model and Portfolio Assessment on the Students' Learning Outcomes of Civic Education. Int. J. Instr. 2022, 15, 473–488. [Google Scholar]
- Saragih, J.; Tarigan, A.; Pratama, I.; Wardati, J.; Silalahi, E.F. The impact of total quality management, supply chain management practices and operations capability on firm performance. Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 2020, 21, 384–397. [Google Scholar]
- Saragih, J.; Tarigan, A.; Silalahi, E.F.; Wardati, J.; Pratama, I. Supply chain operational capability and supply chain operational performance: Does the supply chain management and supply chain integration matters. Int. J Sup. Chain. Mgt Vol 2020, 9, 1222–1229. [Google Scholar]
- Schuetze, B.; Hussein, H. The geopolitical economy of an undermined energy transition: The case of Jordan. Energy Policy 2023, 180, 113655. [Google Scholar]
- Seuring, S.; Müller, M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16, 1699–1710. [Google Scholar]
- Shaer, S.; O’Neil, A.; Salem, F.; Akrout, Z.; Shibl, E. Advancing Artificial Intelligence Impact in Dubai: Future Directors Towards Strengthening the Digital Economy. Future of Government Series 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Shareef, M.A.; Dwivedi, Y.; Ahmed, J.U.; Kumar, U.; Mahmud, R. Stakeholders conflict and private–public partnership chain (PPPC): supply chain of perishable product. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2022, 33, 1218–1245. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, V.; Raj, A.; Chakraborty, A. Analysis of power dynamics in sustainable supply chain under non-linear demand setup. Oper. Manag. Res. 2023, 16, 18–32. [Google Scholar]
- Shishodia, A.; Sharma, R.; Rajesh, R.; Munim, Z.H. Supply chain resilience: A review, conceptual framework and future research. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2023, 34, 879–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snyder, H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 104, 333–339. [Google Scholar]
- Stadtler, H. (2014). Supply chain management: An overview. Supply chain management and advanced planning: Concepts, models, software, and case studies, 3-28.
- Usuga Cadavid, J.P.; Lamouri, S.; Grabot, B.; Pellerin, R.; Fortin, A. Machine learning applied in production planning and control: a state-of-the-art in the era of industry 4.0. J. Intell. Manuf. 2020, 31, 1531–1558. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, T.; Wu, J.; Gu, J.; Hu, L. Impact of open innovation on organizational performance in different conflict management styles: based on resource dependence theory. Int. J. Confl. Manag. 2021, 32, 199–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whittemore, R.; Knafl, K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J. Adv. Nurs. 2005, 52, 546–553. [Google Scholar]
- World Bank. (2022). Jordan: US$85 million for a New Industry Development Fund to Promote Investments and Exports. World Bank. Retrieved 1 October from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/05/16/jordan-us-85-million-for-a-new-industry-development-fund-to-promote-investments-and-exports.
- WorldBank. (2021). Jordan: Country Overview. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/jordan/overview.
- Ye, Y.; Lau, K.H.; Teo, L. Alignment of green supply chain strategies and operations from a product perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, W.; Seo, J.; Kwon, A. Building resilient global value chains in the pandemic era: A conceptual framework and case studies of Singapore and Vietnam. Compet. Nations 2022, 1, 131–162. [Google Scholar]
- Yoo, S.H.; Seo, Y.W. Effect of supply chain structure and power dynamics on R&D and market performances. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2017, 18, 487–504. [Google Scholar]
- Zureiqat, G.; Ostermeier, M. (2022). Country Report for Jordan.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
