Submitted:
07 March 2025
Posted:
10 March 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the effects of complete diets with reduced inclusion levels of crude protein and limiting essential amino acids, fed to pigs in two- and three-phase feeding systems, and the feeding system on crude protein digestibility, nitrogen retention and utilization, fecal and urinary pH, fecal and urinary nitrogen and ammonia levels, and nitrogen excretion. Digestibility-balance trials were performed on 24 growing-finishing pigs housed in individual metabolism crates, in three groups, in two- and three-phase feeding systems. The pigs were fed the following diets: C - control diet; L - low-protein diet where the levels of crude protein and essential amino acids (lysine, methionine + cystine, threonine, and tryptophan) were reduced by 15% relative to diet C; L+AA - low-protein diet supplemented with crystalline lysine, methionine, threonine, and tryptophan to the standard levels (as in diet C). Diets L fed to pigs in two- and three-phase feeding systems significantly decreased crude protein digestibility and nitrogen retention, particularly in the three-phase system. The supplementation of diets L+AA with crystalline essential amino acids improved crude protein digestibility, and nitrogen retention and utilization, especially in the two-phase system. Reduced concentrations of crude protein and essential amino acids in diets L contributed to a highly significant increase in feces and urine acidity in both two- and three-phase feeding systems. The supplementation of diets L+AA with essential amino acids significantly increased urinary pH and increased fecal pH. This experimental factor had no effect on fecal ammonia concentration in group L+AA. The values of pH and total fecal nitrogen were somewhat higher in the two-phase system than in the three-phase system. Fecal ammonia concentration was similar in both systems. The three-phase feeding system contributed to a decrease in urinary pH and total urinary nitrogen. The analyzed feeding systems had no significant effect on urinary ammonia concentration. It was estimated that a 15% reduction in crude protein and essential amino acid levels in pig diets, relative to the standard levels, reduced nitrogen excretion by 18.7% and 15.6% in two- and three-phase feeding systems, respectively. The supplementation of low-protein diets (L) with lysine, methionine, threonine, and tryptophan induced a further reduction in nitrogen excretion. A comparison of the effects of feeding systems (two-phase system vs. three-phase system) on crude protein digestibility, nitrogen retention and utilization revealed that better results were obtained in the two-phase feeding system.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals, Diets, and Experimental Protocols in Digestibility-Balance Trials
2.2. Selected Serum Biochemical Parameters
2.3. Environmental Impact of Diets Fed to Pigs in Two- and Three-Phase Feeding Systems
2.4. Chemical Analyses
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Crude Protein Digestibility, Nitrogen Retention and Utilization
| Item | two-phase feeding system | three-phase feeding system | |||||||
| Group 1 | |||||||||
| C | L | L+AA | SEM | C | L | L+AA | SEM | ||
| Reduced levels of crude protein and amino acids (%) | 0 | 15 | 15 +AA |
0 | 15 | 15 +AA |
|||
| different inclusion levels of crude protein and limiting essential amino acids | |||||||||
| Crude protein (g/l) | 65.9 | 65.1 | 67.5 | 0.094 | 6.69 | 6.65 | 6.39 | 0.109 | |
| Urea (g/dl) | 29.02a | 27.01b | 24.73c | 2.283 | 25.44a | 23.00b | 24.64 | 1.425 | |
| AST (U/l) | 37.75a | 32.88b | 35.38c | 1.855 | 32.96b | 35.21c | 37.71a | 1.839 | |
| ALT (U/l) | 46.20a | 47.75a | 43.31b | 2.830 | 46.10b | 49.00a | 47.08 | 3.181 | |
| different feeding systems | |||||||||
| Crude Protein (g/dl) | 6.62 | 6.57 | 0.105 | ||||||
| Urea (g/dl) | 27.01a | 24.63b | 1.805 | ||||||
| AST (U/l) | 35.34 | 35.29 | 1.765 | ||||||
| ALT (U/l) | 45.75 | 47.39 | 2.987 | ||||||
3.2. Feces and Urine Characteristics
3.3. Fecal and Urinary Nitrogen Excretion
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Alexandratos, N.; Bruinsma, J. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision CEMA. 2015. Towards a New Strategic Agenda for the Common Ag ricultural Policy (CAP) after 2020. CEMA’s contribution to the Mid-term Review of the CAP.
- EPRS, 2016. Precision agriculture and the future of farming in Europe Scientific Foresight.Study(http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/581892/EPRS_STU(20 6)581892_EN.pdf.
- EUROSTA, 2017. Agricultural production ‒ livestock and meat. (https://ec.europa.eu/ eurostat/ statistics -explained/).
- Walczak, J. Precyzyjny chów zwierząt a środowisko naturalne. Przegl. hodow, 2019, 5, 1-6.
- Sobotka, W. ; Drażbo. A. Environmental impacts of diets containing different levels of crude protein and limiting amino acids fed to pigs in a phase feeding system. J. Elem., 2020, 25(2), 645-655. [CrossRef]
- Bednarek, A.; Szklarek, S.; Zalewski, M. Nitrogen pollution removal from areas of intensive farming – comparison of various denitrification biotechnologies. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 2014, 14, 132-141. [CrossRef]
- Kaleem Abbasi, M.; Abdul, Khaliq. Nitrogen mineralization of a loam soil supplemented with organic-inorganic amendments under laboratory incubation. Front Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1038. [CrossRef]
- Gaj, R. Gospodarowanie obornikiem, gnojówką i gnojowicą. Jej przechowywanie i stosowanie BAT. W: Ograniczenie zanieczyszczenia azotem pochodzenia rolniczego metodą poprawy jakości wód. Red. Walczak J. FADP Warszawa, 2018, 109-117. ISBN 978-83-952011-0-3.120s.
- Bobrecka-Jamro, D.; Janowska-Miąsik, E. . Environmental gas pollution from agriculture and strategies to reduce it. Fragm. Agron. 2014, 31(3), 30–40. [Google Scholar]
- Smurzyńska, A.; Dach, J.; Dworecki, Z.; Czekała, W. Emisje gazowe podczas gospodarki gnojowicą. Inż. Ochrona Środ. 2016, 19(1), 109-125. [CrossRef]
- Amann, M. Emissions from agriculture and their control potentials. TSAP Report #3 Version 2.1. Authors: Oene Oenema. Gerard Velthof Alterra. Wageningen UR Zbigniew Klimont. Wilfried Winiwarter. Editor International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) 2012, 1-45.
- United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Framework Code for Good Agricultural Practice for Reducing Ammonia Emissions. Document nr ECE/ EB.AIR/129, 2015.
- Le Dinh. P.; Aarnink. A.; Nutritional Strategies to Reduce Emissions from Waste in Pig production. In Achieving Sustainable Production of Pig Meat; Mathew. A. Ed.; Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing: Cambridge. UK. 2019; pp. 227–242. ISBN 978 1 78676 0883.
- Hayes, E.T.; Leek, A.B.G.; Currant, T.P. Dodd V.A.; Carton O. T.; Beattie, V.E.; O’Doherty J.V. The influence of diet crude protein level on odour and ammonia emissions from finishing pig houses. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 91:309-315. [CrossRef]
- Reidy., B.; Webb., J.; Misselbrook., T.H.; Menzi., H.; Luesink., H.H.; Hutchings., N.J.; Eurich-Menden., B.; Doher, H.; Dammgen, U. Comparison of models used for national agricultural ammonia emission inventories in Europe: Litter-based manure systems. Atmos. Environ. 2009. 43. 1632–1640. [CrossRef]
- European Environment Agency (EEA). European Union Emission Inventory, Report 1990–2021 under the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2023. PDF (horizoneuropencpportal.eu).
- Portejoie, S.; Dourmad, J.Y.; Martinez, J.; Lebreton, Y. Effect of lowering dietary crude protein on nitrogen excretion. manure composition and ammonia emission from fattening pigs. Liv. Prod. Sci. 2004, 91: 45-55. [CrossRef]
- Niemi, J.K.; Sevoń-Aimonen, M-L.; Pietola, K.; Stadler, K.J. 2010. The value of precision feeding technologies for grow-finish swine. Liv. Sci. 2010, 129(1-3), 13-23. [CrossRef]
- Hauschild, L.; Lovatto, P.A.; Pomar, J.; Pomar, C. 2012. Development of sustainable precision farming systems for swine: estimating real-time individual amino acid requirements in growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 90(7), 2255-63. [CrossRef]
- Hartung, J.; Banhazi, T.; Vranken, E.; Guarino, M. 2017. European farmers’ experiences with precision livestock farm ing systems. Animal Frontiers 2017, 7(1), 38-44. [CrossRef]
- Semeniuk, W.; Grela, E.R. The effect of reduced protein level in pigs feeding in a dosing system or ad libitum on the level of nitrogen indicators in blood and urine. Med. Wet. 2011, 67(5): 339-32.
- Andretta, I.; Pomar, C.; Rivest, J.; Pomar, J. Precision feeding can significantly reduce lysine intake and nitrogen excretion without compromising the performance of growing pigs. Animal, 2016, 10(7), 1137-1147. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wang, G.; Cai, S.; Zeng, X.; Qiao, S. Advances in low-protein diets for swine. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 19, 9–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Le Dinh. P.; van der Peet-Schwering. C.M.C.; Ogink. N.W.M.; Aarnink. A.J.A. Effect of Diet Composition on Excreta Composition and Ammonia Emissions from Growing-Finishing Pigs. Animals 2022. 12. 229. [CrossRef]
- Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU) Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parialment and of the Council on the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes. OJEU 20.10.2010. Series L 276; OJEU: Brussels. Belgium. 2010; pp. 33–79.
- Nutrient Requirements of Pigs 2014. J. Feeding Guidelines and Nutritional Value of Feed Mixtures for Pigs. In Feeding Guidelines for Pigs. 2nd ed.; The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition; PAS: Jabłonna. Poland. 2014, p. 64. (In Polish).
- AOAC International. Official Methods of Analysis, 19th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Arlington. VA. USA. 2007.
- PN-77/R-64820:1997. Feeds. Tryptophan Determination. Available online: https://sklep.pkn.pl/pn-r-64820-1977p.html (accessed on 28 February 2021).
- BN-74/9162-01:1974. Metody oceny jakości i wartości pokarmowej kiszonek (Methods for assessing the quality and nutritional value of silage. https://sklep.pkn.pl/pn-r-74/9162-01).
- Winnicka. A. Wartości Referencyjne Podstawowych Badań Laboratoryjnych w Weterynarii (The Reference Values of Basic Laboratory Analyses in Veterinary Medicine). Wydawnictwo SGGW: Warszawa. Poland. 2015.
- StatSoft Inc. Statistica (Data Analysis Software System); Version 13; StataSoft Inc: Tulusa. OK. USA. 2018.
- Kirchgessner, M.: Market, W.;. Roth, F.X. 1994. Einfluβ der lysin- und energieversorgung auf die n-bilanz von mastschweinen 4. Mitteilung ΰber bilanzstudien zur reduzierung der n-ausscheidung. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 1994, 71, 147-155. [CrossRef]
- Grela, E.R.; Pastuszak, J.; Czech, A. Wpływ ograniczenia poziomu białka w dawce przy zróżnicowanej zawartości aminokwasów na efekty tuczu świń. Ann. UMCS, 2004, Vol. XXII, 18, 129-135.
- Więcek, J.; Skomiał, J. , Rekiel, A.; Śliwiński, M. Wpływ poziomu białka i AA w mieszankach dla tuczników na strawność składników pokarmowych. Przegl. Hodowl. 2006, 2, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Kerr, B.J.; Easter, R.A. Effect of feeding reduced protein, amino acid-supplemented diets on nitrogen and energy balance in grower pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 1995, 73:3000-3008. [CrossRef]
- Caitlin, E. Vonderohe; Kayla, M. Mills; Shule, Liu.; Matthew, D. Asmus; Emily, R. Otto-Tico; Brian, T. Richert; Ji-Qin, Ni.; John Scott Radcliffe;. The effect of reduced CP, synthetic amino acid supplemented diets on growth performance and nutrient excretion in wean to Finish swine. J Anim Sci. 2022, 11, 100, 1-15. [CrossRef]
- Shriver, J.A.; Carter, S.D.; Sutton, A.I.; Richert, B.T.; Senne, B.W.; Pettey, L.A. A. Effects of adding fiber sources to reduced crude protein, amino acids suplemented diets on nitrogen excretion, growth performance nd carcass traits of finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 81, 492–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Figueroa, J.L.; Lewis, A.J.; Miller, P.S.; Fisher, R.L.; Gomez, R. S.; Diedrichsen, R. M. Nitrogen metabolism and growth performance of gilts fed standard corn-soybean meal diets or low-crude protein, amino acid-supplemented diets. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 80, 2911–2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canh, T.T.; Aarnink, A.J.A.; Schutte, J.B.; Sutton, A.; Langhout D.J.,Verstegen M.W.A. Dietary protein affects nitrogen excretion and amonia emissioin from slurry of growing-finishing pigs. Livest. Product. Sci. 1998, 56,181-191. [CrossRef]
- Kerr,B. J.; Southern, L.L.; Bidner, T.D.; Friesen, K.G.; Easter, R.A. Influence of dietary protein level. Amino acid supplementation and dietary energy levels on growing-finishing pig performance and carcass composition. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 81, 3075-3087. [CrossRef]
- Leek, A.BG.; Callan, J.J.; Henry, R.W.; O’Doherty, J.V. The application of low crude protein wheat-soybean diets to growing and finishing pigs” The effects on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion faecal volatile fatty acid concentration and ammonia emission from boars. Ir. J. Agr. Res. 2005, 44, 274–260. [Google Scholar]
- Otto, E.R.; Yokoyama, M.Ku.; Ames, N.K.; Trottier, N.L. 2023. Nitrogen balance and ileal amino acid digestibility in growing pigs fed diets reduced in protein concentration. J. Anim. Sci. 2023, 81, 1743–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patráš, P.; Nitrayová, S.; Brestenský, M.; Hege, J. Effect of dietary fiber and crude protein content in feed on nitrogen retention in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 23, 2012.90:158–160. [CrossRef]
- Cappelaere, L.; Le Cour Grandmaison, J.; Martin, N.; Lambert, W. Amino acid supplementation to reduce environmental impacts of broiler and pig production: A Review. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carpernter, A.A.; O’Mara, F.P.; O’Doherty, V.O. 2004. The effect of dietary crude protein concentration on growth performance, carcass, composition and nitrogen excreation in entire grower-finisher pigs. Ir. J. Agr. Res. 2004, 43, 227-236.
- Htoo, J. K.; Sauer, W. C.; Araiza, B.A.; Cervantes, M.; Iiao, S.F.; Zhang, Y. The effect of feeding low-phytate hulless barley soybean meal diets differing in protein content to growing pigs. J. Anim and Feed Sci. 2007, 16, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shurson, G.C.; Rylie, E.; Pelton, O.; Zhaohui Yang; Urriola P.E.; Schmitt J. Environmental impacts of eco-nutrition swine feeding programs in spatially explicit geographic regions of the United States. J. Anim. Sci. 2022, 100. [CrossRef]
- Prince, T.J.; Sutton, A.L.; Von Bernuth, R.D.; Verstegen, M.W.A. Application of nutritional knowledge for developing econutrition feeding programs on commercial swine farms. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 77, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pomar, C.; Andretta, J.; Remus, A. Feeding Strategies to Reduce Nutrient Losses and Improve the Sustainability of Growing Pigs. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
Experimental factor |
Pig feeding system | ||||||
| two-phase system | three-phase system | ||||||
| Diet1 | |||||||
| C | L | L+AA | C | L | L+AA | ||
| Reduced levels of crude protein and amino acids (%) | 0 | 15 | 15+AA | 0 | 15 | 15+AA | |
| Dietary levels of crude protein (%) and essential amino acid (%) during the entire fattening period 2 | |||||||
| Crude protein | 16.60 | 14.20 | 14.30 | 15.90 | 13.50 | 13.50 | |
| Lysine | 0.91 | 0.78 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.72 | 0.84 | |
| Methionine + cystine | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.64 | |
| Threonine | 0.59 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.46 | 0.56 | |
| Tryptophan | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.19 | |
| Number of pigs (head) | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
|
Item |
two-phase feeding system | three-phase feeding system | |||||
| Diet1 | |||||||
| Grower/Finisher fed to pigs with a body weight of 30-70 kg (Experiment 1)/70-110 kg (Experiment 2) |
Grower 1/Grower 2/Finisher fed to pigs with a body weight of 30-55 kg (Experiment 1A)/55-80 kg (Experiment 1B)/80-110 kg (Experiment 2A) |
||||||
| C | L | L+AA | C | L | L+AA | ||
| Reduced levels of crude protein and amino acids | 0 | 15 | 15+AA | 0 | 15 | 15+AA | |
| Feed components (%) | |||||||
| Ground grain (wheat + barley) |
76.8/83.6 | 81.9/89.2 | 81.7/88.8 | 76.8/83.3/87.8 | 82.4/89.2/95.4 | 81.5/88.8/95.5 | |
| SBM 2 | 15 / 6 | 9 / 0 | 9 / - | 15 / 9 / - | 9 /3 / - | 9 / 3 /- | |
| RSM “00” | 5 / 8 | 5 / 8 | 5 / 8 | 5 / 5 / 10 | 5 / 5 / 2 | 5 / 5 / 2 | |
| Rapeseed oil | - | 0.8 / 0.4 | 0.8 / 0.4 | - / 0.3 / - | 0.8 / 0.4 | 0.8 / 0.4 | |
| Mineral-vitamin premix2 | 3.0 / 2.2 | 3.0 / 2.2 | 3.0 / 2.2 | 3.0 / 2.2 / 2.0 | 3.0 / 2.2 / 2.0 | 3.0 / 2.2 / 2.0 | |
| Supplementation with crystalline amino acids (%): | |||||||
| L-lysine HCL (78%) | 0.20/0.23 | 0.25/0.23 | 0.41 /0.42 | 0.20/ 0.23/0.2 |
0.25/0.28 /0.2 |
0.41/0.42 /0.35 |
|
| DL-methionine (99%) | - | - | 0.15/0.05 | - | - | 0.15/0.09/ 0.06 |
|
| L-threonine (98%) | - | - | 0.09/0.09 | - | - | 0.09/0.09 /0.11 |
|
| DL-tryptophan (98%) | - | - | 0.03/0.04 | - | - | 0.03/03.03 | |
| Average nutritional value of diets during the entire fattening period (g/kg-1): | |||||||
| Crude protein | 165 | 140 | 141 | 158 | 135 | 136 | |
| Digestible protein | 135 | 111 | 116 | 130 | 109 | 111 | |
| Lysine | 6.9 | 5.9 | 6.9 | 6.6 | 6.0 | 6.6 | |
| Methionine + cystine | 6.9 | 5.9 | 6.9 | 6.6 | 6.0 | 6.6 | |
| Threonine | 5.9 | 5.0 | 5.9 | 5.6 | 4.7 | 5.6 | |
| Tryptophan | 2.0 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.9 | |
| Crude fiber | 40.1 | 39.6 | 39.4 | 42.1 | 41.3 | 43.0 | |
| Metabolizable energy (MJ kg-1) 3 | 13.11 | 13.04 | 13.11 | 13.16 | 13.12 | 13.10 | |
| Item | two-phase feeding system | three-phase feeding system | ||||||||
| Group 1 | ||||||||||
| C | L | L+AA | SEM | C | L | L+AA | SEM | |||
| Reduced levels of crude protein and amino acids (%) | 0 | 15 | 15 +AA |
0 | 15 | 15 +AA |
||||
| different inclusion levels of crude protein and limiting essential amino acids | ||||||||||
| N digestibility x 6.25 (%) | 82.1b | 79.4a | 82.4b | 0.642 | 82.2b | 80.6a | 81.6b | 0.656 | ||
| Daily nitrogen balance (g kg-1): | ||||||||||
| N intake | 70.6B | 60.9A | 60.5A | 1.364 | 67.9b | 58.9a | 58.3a | 1.323 | ||
| Fecal N excretion | 12.6b | 12.5b | 10.8a | 0.458 | 12.1 | 11.4 | 10.7 | 0.475 | ||
| N digested | 58.0B | 48.4A | 49.7A | 0.763 | 55.8B | 47.5A | 47.6A | 0.698 | ||
| Urinary N excretion | 29.8B | 21.2A | 22.0A | 0.909 | 28.3B | 22.7A | 22.9A | 0.961 | ||
| N retention | 28.2 | 27.2 | 27.7 | 0.459 | 27.5b | 24.8a | 24.7a | 0.620 | ||
| Nitrogen utilization (%): | ||||||||||
| N retention/N intake | 39.9a | 44.7b | 45.8b | 0.996 | 40.5 | 42.1 | 42.4 | 0.805 | ||
| N retention/N digested | 48.6a | 56.2b | 55.7b | 1.308 | 49.3a | 52.2b | 51.9b | 0.729 | ||
| different feeding systems | ||||||||||
| N digestibility x 6.25 (%) | 81.3 | 81.5 | 0.561 | |||||||
| Daily nitrogen balance (g kg-1): | ||||||||||
| N intake | 64.0 | 61.7 | 1.013 | |||||||
| Fecal N excretion | 12.0 | 11.4 | 0.654 | |||||||
| N digested | 52.0 | 50.3 | 0.611 | |||||||
| Urinary N excretion | 24.3 | 24.6 | 0.894 | |||||||
| N retention | 27.5b | 25.7a | 0.532 | |||||||
| Nitrogen utilization (%): | ||||||||||
| N retention/N intake | 42.9 | 41.6 | 0.897 | |||||||
| N retention/N digested (PBV) | 53.7b | 51.1a | 0.946 | |||||||
| Item | two-phase feeding system | three-phase feeding system | ||||||
| Group1 | ||||||||
| C | L | L+AA | SEM | C | L | L+AA | SEM | |
| Reduced levels of crude protein and amino acids (%) | 0 | 15 | 15 +AA |
0 | 15 | 15 +AA |
||
| different inclusion levels of crude protein and limiting essential amino acids | ||||||||
| Fecal pH | 6.40b | 6.16a | 6.29 | 0.050 | 6.32b | 6.17a | 6.23 | 0.045 |
| Total fecal N (%) | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.018 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.012 |
| Fecal ammonia (%) | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.002 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.013 |
| different feeding systems | ||||||||
| Fecal pH | 6.28 | 6.24 | 0.039 | |||||
| Total fecal N (%) | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.011 | |||||
| Fecal ammonia (%) | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.060 | |||||
| Item | two-phase feeding system | three-phase feeding system | ||||||
| Group1 | ||||||||
| C | L | L+AA | SEM | C | L | L+AA | SEM | |
| Reduced levels of crude protein and amino acids (%) | 0 | 15 | 15 +AA |
0 | 15 | 15 +AA |
||
| different inclusion levels of crude protein and limiting essential amino acids | ||||||||
| Urinary pH | 6.59B | 6.31Aa | 6.46b | 0.035 | 6.66Ba | 6.14Aa | 6.41b | 0.096 |
| Total urinary N (%) | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.030 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.023 |
| Urinary ammonia (%) | 0.40b | 0.37a | 0.40b | 0.011 | 0.37a | 0.40b | 0.41b | 0.022 |
| different feeding systems | ||||||||
| Urinary pH | 6.45 | 6.40 | 0.046 | |||||
| Total urinary N (%) | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.033 | |||||
| Urinary ammonia (%) | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.015 | |||||
| Item | two-phase feeding system | three-phase feeding system | ||||
| Group1 | ||||||
| C | L | L+AA | C | L | L+AA | |
| Reduced levels of crude protein and amino acids (%) | 0 | 15 | 15+AA | 0 | 15 | 15+AA |
| N intake (g kg-1) | 987.7 | 852.6 | 847.0 | 950.1 | 824.1 | 816.7 |
| Fecal N excretion (g kg-1) | 176.4 | 175.0 | 150.5 | 168.9 | 159.6 | 149.8 |
| Urinary N excretion (g kg-1) | 416.5 | 307.3 | 308.7 | 396.7 | 317.8 | 320.6 |
| Fecal and urinary N excretion (g kg-1) | 592.9 | 482.3 | 459.2 | 565.6 | 477.4 | 471.4 |
| Reduction in nitrogen excretion depending on: | ||||||
| ||||||
| (g kg-1) | 0.0 | -110.6 | n/a | 0.0 | -88.2 | n/a |
| (%) | 100 | 81.3 | n/a | 100 | 84.4 | n/a |
| ||||||
| (g kg-1) | n/a | 0.0 | -23.1 | n/a | 0.0 | -7.0 |
| (%) | n/a | 100 | 95.2 | n/a | 100 | 98.3 |
| Fecal and urinary N excretion in different feeding systems | ||||||
| two-phase feeding system | three-phase feeding system | |||||
| (g kg-1) | 511.5 | 504.5 | ||||
| Reduction in nitrogen excretion in different feeding systems: | ||||||
|
(g kg-1) (%) |
0.0 100 |
- 7.0 98.6 |
||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).